The signed domatic number of some regular graphs

Let G be a finite and simple graph with vertex set V(G), and let f:V(G)→{−1,1} be a two-valued function. If ∑_x∈N[v]f(x)≥1 for each v∈V(G), where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v, then f is a signed dominating function on G. A set {f₁,f₂,…,f_d} of signed dominating functions on G with the property that for each x∈V(G), is called a signed dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed dominating family on G is the signed domatic number on G. In this paper, we investigate the signed domatic number of some circulant graphs and of the torus C_p×C_q.     

Signed star domatic number of a graph

Let G be a simple graph without isolated vertices with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)?{−1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function on G if ∑_e∈E(v)f(e)≥1 for every vertex v of G, where E(v)={uv∈E(G)∣u∈N(v)}. A set {f₁,f₂,…,f_d} of signed star dominating functions on G with the property that for each e∈E(G), is called a signed star dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed star dominating family on G is the signed star domatic number of G, denoted by d_SS(G).In this paper we study the properties of the signed star domatic number d_SS(G). In particular, we determine the signed domatic number of some classes of graphs.     

Lower bounds on the signed domination numbers of directed graphs

A numerical invariant of directed graphs concerning domination which is named signed domination number γ_S is studied in this paper. We present some sharp lower bounds for γ_S in terms of the order, the maximum degree and the chromatic number of a directed graph.     

Lower bounds on signed edge total domination numbers in graphs

The open neighborhood N _G (e) of an edge e in a graph G is the set consisting of all edges having a common end-vertex with e. Let f be a function on E(G), the edge set of G, into the set {−1, 1}. If for each e ∈ E(G), then f is called a signed edge total dominating function of G. The minimum of the values , taken over all signed edge total dominating function f of G, is called the signed edge total domination number of G and is denoted by γ _st ′(G). Obviously, γ _st ′(G) is defined only for graphs G which have no connected components isomorphic to K ₂. In this paper we present some lower bounds for γ _st ′(G). In particular, we prove that γ _st ′(T) ⩾ 2 − m/3 for every tree T of size m ⩾ 2. We also classify all trees T with γ _st ′(T). Research supported by a Faculty Research Grant, University of West Georgia.     

Upper bounds on the upper signed total domination number of graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A function f:V→{−1,+1} defined on the vertices of G is a signed total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. A signed total dominating function f is minimal if there does not exist a signed total dominating function g, f≠g, for which g(v)≤f(v) for every v∈V. The weight of a signed total dominating function is the sum of its function values over all vertices of G. The upper signed total domination number of G is the maximum weight of a minimal signed total dominating function on G. In this paper we present a sharp upper bound on the upper signed total domination number of an arbitrary graph. This result generalizes previous results for regular graphs and nearly regular graphs.     

On signed majority total domination in graphs

We initiate the study of signed majority total domination in graphs. Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph. For any real valued function f: V and S V, let . A signed majority total dominating function is a function f: V {–1, 1} such that f(N(v)) 1 for at least a half of the vertices v V. The signed majority total domination number of a graph G is = min{f(V): f is a signed majority total dominating function on G}. We research some properties of the signed majority total domination number of a graph G and obtain a few lower bounds of .This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China.     

On signed cycle domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph, a function f:E→{−1,1} is said to be an signed cycle dominating function (SCDF) of G if ∑_e∈E(C)f(e)≥1 holds for any induced cycle C of G. The signed cycle domination number of G is defined as is an SCDF of G}. In this paper, we obtain bounds on , characterize all connected graphs G with , and determine the exact value of for some special classes of graphs G. In addition, we pose some open problems and conjectures.     

Lower bounds on several versions of signed domination number

Three numerical invariants of graphs concerning domination, which are named the signed domination number γ_s, the k-subdomination number γ_ks and the signed total domination number γ_st, are studied in this paper. For any graph, some lower bounds on γ_s, γ_ks and γ_st are presented, some of which generalize several known lower bounds on γ_s, γ_ks and γ_st, while others are considered as new. It is also shown that these bounds are sharp.     

A note on the signed edge domination number in graphs

Let G=(V(G),E(G)) be a graph. A function f:E(G)→{+1,−1} is called the signed edge domination function (SEDF) of G if ∑_e^′N[e]f(e^′)≥1 for every eE(G). The signed edge domination number of G is defined as is a SEDF of G}. Xu [Baogen Xu, Two classes of edge domination in graphs, Discrete Applied Mathematics 154 (2006) 1541–1546] researched on the edge domination in graphs and proved that for any graph G of order n(n≥4). In the article, he conjectured that: For any 2-connected graph G of order n(n≥2), . In this note, we present some counterexamples to the above conjecture and prove that there exists a family of k-connected graphs G_m,k with .     

The signed star domination numbers of the Cartesian product graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)→{-1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function of G if for every v∈V(G), where E_G(v)={uv∈E(G)|u∈V(G)}. The minimum of the values of , taken over all signed star dominating functions f on G, is called the signed star domination number of G and is denoted by γ_SS(G). In this paper, a sharp upper bound of γ_SS(G×H) is presented.     

Dominating sets and domatic number of circular arc graphs

A dominating set of a graph G = (N,E) is a subset S of nodes such that every node is either in S or adjacent to a node which is in S. The domatic number of G is the size of a maximum cardinality partition of N into dominating sets. The problems of finding a minimum cardinality dominating set and the domatic number are both NP-complete even for special classes of graphs. In the present paper we give an O(n∣E∣) time algorithm that finds a minimum cardinality dominating set when G is a circular arc graph (intersection graph of arcs on a circle). The domatic number problem is solved in O(n² log n) time when G is a proper circular arc graph, and it is shown NP-complete for general circular arc graphs.     

Remarks on restrained domination and total restrained domination in graphs

The restrained domination number ^r(G) and the total restrained domination number _t ^r (G) of a graph G were introduced recently by various authors as certain variants of the domination number (G) of (G). A well-known numerical invariant of a graph is the domatic number d(G) which is in a certain way related (and may be called dual) to (G). The paper tries to define analogous concepts also for the restrained domination and the total restrained domination and discusses the sense of such new definitions.This research was supported by Grant MSM 245100303 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.     

A lower bound on the total signed domination numbers of graphs

Let G be a finite connected simple graph with a vertex set V(G)and an edge set E(G). A total signed domination function of G is a function f:V(G)∪E(G)→{-1,1}.The weight of f is W(f)=∑_(x∈V)(G)∪E(G))f(X).For an element x∈V(G)∪E(G),we define f[x]=∑_(y∈NT[x])f(y).A total signed domination function of G is a function f:V(G)∪E(G)→{-1,1} such that f[x]≥1 for all x∈V(G)∪E(G).The total signed domination numberγ_s~*(G)of G is the minimum weight of a total signed domination function on G. In this paper,we obtain some lower bounds for the total signed domination number of a graph G and compute the exact values ofγ_s~*(G)when G is C_n and P_n.     

Flow number and circular flow number of signed cubic graphs

Let $\mathrm{\Phi }(G,\sigma )$ and ${\mathrm{\Phi }}_c(G,\sigma )$ denote the flow number and the circular flow number of a flow-admissible signed graph $(G,\sigma )$, respectively. It is known that $\mathrm{\Phi }(G)=?{\mathrm{\Phi }}_c(G)?$ for every unsigned graph G. Based on this fact, in 2011 Raspaud and Zhu conjectured that $\mathrm{\Phi }(G,\sigma )?{\mathrm{\Phi }}_c(G,\sigma )<1$ holds also for every flow-admissible signed graph $(G,\sigma )$. This conjecture was disproved by Schubert and Steffen using graphs with bridges and vertices of large degree. In this paper we focus on cubic graphs, since they play a crucial role in many open problems in graph theory. For cubic graphs we show that $\mathrm{\Phi }(G,\sigma )=3$ if and only if ${\mathrm{\Phi }}_c(G,\sigma )=3$ and if $\mathrm{\Phi }(G,\sigma )\in \{4,5\}$, then $4\le {\mathrm{\Phi }}_c(G,\sigma )\le \mathrm{\Phi }(G,\sigma )$. We also prove that all pairs of flow number and circular flow number that fulfil these conditions can be achieved in the family of bridgeless cubic graphs and thereby disprove the conjecture of Raspaud and Zhu even for bridgeless signed cubic graphs. Finally, we prove that all currently known flow-admissible graphs without nowhere-zero 5-flow have flow number and circular flow number 6 and propose several conjectures in this area.     

Inequality of Nordhaus-Gaddum type for total outer-connected domination in graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G = (V, E) without isolated vertices is a total outer-connected dominating set (TCDS) of G if S is a total dominating set of G and G[V − S] is connected. The total outer-connected domination number of G, denoted by γ _tc (G), is the minimum cardinality of a TCDS of G. For an arbitrary graph without isolated vertices, we obtain the upper and lower bounds on γ _tc (G) + γ _tc ($ \bar G $ \bar G ), and characterize the extremal graphs achieving these bounds.     

Lower bounds for the domination number and the total domination number of direct product graphs

A sharp lower bound for the domination number and the total domination number of the direct product of finitely many complete graphs is given: . Sharpness is established in the case when the factors are large enough in comparison to the number of factors. The main result gives a lower bound for the domination (and the total domination) number of the direct product of two arbitrary graphs: γ(G×H)≥γ(G)+γ(H)−1. Infinite families of graphs that attain the bound are presented. For these graphs it also holds that γ_t(G×H)=γ(G)+γ(H)−1. Some additional parallels with the total domination number are made.     

Lower bounds on the signed total k-domination number of graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G). For any integer k ≥ 1, a signed total k-dominating function is a function f: V(G) → {?1, 1} satisfying ∑_x∈N(v)f(x) ≥ k for every v ∈ V(G), where N(v) is the neighborhood of v. The minimum of the values ∑_v∈V(G)f(v), taken over all signed total k-dominating functions f, is called the signed total k-domination number. In this note we present some new sharp lower bounds on the signed total k-domination number of a graph. Some of our results improve known bounds.     

Circular flow on signed graphs

The circular flow number Φc(G,σ) of a signed graph (G,σ) is the minimum r for which an orientation of (G,σ) admits a circular r-flow. We prove that the circular flow number of a signed graph (G,σ) is equal to the minimum imbalance ratio of an orientation of (G,σ). We then use this result to prove that if G is 4-edge-connected and (G,σ) has a nowhere zero flow, then Φc(G,σ) (as well as Φ(G,σ)) is at most 4. If G is 6-edge-connected and (G,σ) has a nowhere zero flow, then Φc(G,σ) is strictly less than 4.