The vertex linear arboricity of distance graphs

A distance graph is a graph G(R,D) with the set of all points of the real line as vertex set and two vertices u,v∈R are adjacent if and only if |u-v|∈D where the distance set D is a subset of the positive real numbers. Here, the vertex linear arboricity of G(R,D) is determined when D is an interval between 1 and δ. In particular, the vertex linear arboricity of integer distance graphs G(D) is discussed, too.     

List Point Arboricity of Dense Graphs

Let G be a simple graph. The point arboricity ρ(G) of G is defined as the minimum number of subsets in a partition of the point set of G so that each subset induces an acyclic subgraph. The list point arboricity ρ _l (G) is the minimum k so that there is an acyclic L-coloring for any list assignment L of G which |L(v)| ≥ k. So ρ(G) ≤ ρ _l (G) for any graph G. Xue and Wu proved that the list point arboricity of bipartite graphs can be arbitrarily large. As an analogue to the well-known theorem of Ohba for list chromatic number, we obtain ρ _l (G + K _n ) = ρ(G + K _n ) for any fixed graph G when n is sufficiently large. As a consequence, if ρ(G) is close enough to half of the number of vertices in G, then ρ _l (G) = ρ(G). Particularly, we determine that , where K _2(n) is the complete n-partite graph with each partite set containing exactly two vertices. We also conjecture that for a graph G with n vertices, if then ρ _l (G) = ρ(G). Research supported by NSFC (No.10601044) and XJEDU2006S05.     

An inequality involving the vertex arboricity and edge arboricity of a graph

Let a(G) and a₁(G) denote the vertex arboricity and the edge arboricity of G, respectively. The inequality a(G) ? a₁(G) is proved, and this is sharp. Two related inequalities, involving another parameter, are also proved.     

New bounds for the broadcast domination number of a graph

A dominating broadcast on a graph G = (V, E) is a function f: V → {0, 1, ..., diam G} such that f(v) ≤ e(v) (the eccentricity of v) for all v ∈ V and such that each vertex is within distance f(v) from a vertex v with f(v) > 0. The cost of a broadcast f is σ(f) = Σ _v∈V f(v), and the broadcast number λ _b (G) is the minimum cost of a dominating broadcast. A set X ? V(G) is said to be irredundant if each x ∈ X dominates a vertex y that is not dominated by any other vertex in X; possibly y = x. The irredundance number ir (G) is the cardinality of a smallest maximal irredundant set of G. We prove the bound λ_b(G) ≤ 3 ir(G)/2 for any graph G and show that equality is possible for all even values of ir (G). We also consider broadcast domination as an integer programming problem, the dual of which provides a lower bound for λ_b.     

The Chartrand-Schuster conjecture: Graphs with unique distance trees are regular

Let G be a finite connected graph with no cut vertex. A distance tree T is a spanning tree of G which further satisfies the condition that for some vertex v, d_G(v, u) = d_T(v, u) for all u, where d_G(v, u) denotes the distance of u from v in the graph G. The conjecture that if all distance trees of G are isomorphic to each other then G is a regular graph, is settled affirmatively. The conjecture was made by Chartrand and Schuster.     

A constructive characterization of total domination vertex critical graphs

Let G be a graph of order n and maximum degree Δ(G) and let γ_t(G) denote the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of a graph G. A graph G with no isolated vertex is the total domination vertex critical if for any vertex v of G that is not adjacent to a vertex of degree one, the total domination number of G−v is less than the total domination number of G. We call these graphs γ_t-critical. For any γ_t-critical graph G, it can be shown that n≤Δ(G)(γ_t(G)−1)+1. In this paper, we prove that: Let G be a connected γ_t-critical graph of order n (n≥3), then n=Δ(G)(γ_t(G)−1)+1 if and only if G is regular and, for each v∈V(G), there is an A⊆V(G)−{v} such that N(v)∩A=0?, the subgraph induced by A is 1-regular, and every vertex in V(G)−A−{v} has exactly one neighbor in A.     

Vertex Arboricity and Vertex Degrees

The vertex arboricity of a graph G, denoted a(G), is the minimum number of subsets into which V(G) can be partitioned so that each subset induces an acyclic graph. We first give a vertex degree condition to guarantee \(a(G) \le k\), which is best possible in the same sense as Chvátal’s well-known hamiltonian degree condition. We then explore comparably strong degree conditions for \(a(G) \ge k\), and show that any such condition has intrinsic complexity which grows superpolynomially with the order of G.     

Graph Equation for Line Graphs and m-Step Graphs

Given a graph G, the m-step graph of G, denoted by S _m (G), has the same vertex set as G and an edge between two distinct vertices u and v if there is a walk of length m from u to v. The line graph of G, denoted by L(G), is a graph such that the vertex set of L(G) is the edge set of G and two vertices u and v of L(G) are adjacent if the edges corresponding to u and v share a common end vertex in G. We characterize connected graphs G such that S _m (G) and L(G) are isomorphic.     

A note on the list vertex arboricity of toroidal graphs

The vertex arboricity $a\left(G\right)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of colors required to color the vertices of $G$ such that no cycle is monochromatic. The list vertex arboricity $a_l\left(G\right)$ is the list-coloring version of this concept. In this note, we prove that if $G$ is a toroidal graph, then $a_l\left(G\right)\le 4$; and $a_l\left(G\right)=4$ if and only if $G$ contains $K_7$ as an induced subgraph.     

Tree coloring of distance graphs with a real interval set

Let R be the set of real numbers and D be a subset of the positive real numbers. The distance graph G(R,D) is a graph with the vertex set R and two vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if |x−y|D. In this work, the vertex arboricity (i.e., the minimum number of subsets into which the vertex set V(G) can be partitioned so that each subset induces an acyclic subgraph) of G(R,D) is determined for D being an interval between 1 and δ.     

On the eccentric distance sum of trees and unicyclic graphs

Let G be a simple connected graph with the vertex set V(G). The eccentric distance sum of G is defined as ξd(G)=_∑v∈V(G)ε(v)DG(v), where ε(v) is the eccentricity of the vertex v and DG(v)=_∑u∈V(G)d(u,v) is the sum of all distances from the vertex v. In this paper we characterize the extremal unicyclic graphs among n-vertex unicyclic graphs with given girth having the minimal and second minimal eccentric distance sum. In addition, we characterize the extremal trees with given diameter and minimal eccentric distance sum.     

The acircuitic directed star arboricity of subcubic graphs is at most four

A directed star forest is a forest all of whose components are stars with arcs emanating from the center to the leaves. The acircuitic directed star arboricity of an oriented graph G (that is a digraph with no opposite arcs) is the minimum number of arc-disjoint directed star forests whose union covers all arcs of G and such that the union of any two such forests is acircuitic. We show that every subcubic graph has acircuitic directed star arboricity at most four.     

Competitively Tight Graphs

The competition graph of a digraph D is a (simple undirected) graph which has the same vertex set as D and has an edge between two distinct vertices x and y if and only if there exists a vertex v in D such that (x, v) and (y, v) are arcs of D. For any graph G, G together with sufficiently many isolated vertices is the competition graph of some acyclic digraph. The competition number k(G) of a graph G is the smallest number of such isolated vertices. Computing the competition number of a graph is an NP-hard problem in general and has been one of the important research problems in the study of competition graphs. Opsut [1982] showed that the competition number of a graph G is related to the edge clique cover number θ _E (G) of the graph G via θ _E (G) ? |V(G)| + 2 ≤ k(G) ≤ θ _E (G). We first show that for any positive integer m satisfying 2 ≤ m ≤ |V(G)|, there exists a graph G with k(G) = θ _E (G) ? |V(G)| + m and characterize a graph G satisfying k(G) = θ _E (G). We then focus on what we call competitively tight graphs G which satisfy the lower bound, i.e., k(G) = θ _E (G) ? |V(G)| + 2. We completely characterize the competitively tight graphs having at most two triangles. In addition, we provide a new upper bound for the competition number of a graph from which we derive a sufficient condition and a necessary condition for a graph to be competitively tight.     

On the rank spread of graphs

For a simple graph G?=?(𝒱, ?) with vertex-set 𝒱?=?{1,?…?,?n}, let 𝒮(G) be the set of all real symmetric n-by-n matrices whose graph is G. We present terminology linking established as well as new results related to the minimum rank problem, with spectral properties in graph theory. The minimum rank mr(G) of G is the smallest possible rank over all matrices in 𝒮(G). The rank spread r _v (G) of G at a vertex v, defined as mr(G)???mr(G???v), can take values ??∈?{0,?1,?2}. In general, distinct vertices in a graph may assume any of the three values. For ??=?0 or 1, there exist graphs with uniform r _v (G) (equal to the same integer at each vertex v). We show that only for ??=?0, will a single matrix A in 𝒮(G) determine when a graph has uniform rank spread. Moreover, a graph G, with vertices of rank spread zero or one only, is a λ-core graph for a λ-optimal matrix A in 𝒮(G). We also develop sufficient conditions for a vertex of rank spread zero or two and a necessary condition for a vertex of rank spread two.     

Factor-critical property in 3-dominating-critical graphs

A vertex subset S of a graph G is a dominating set if every vertex of G either belongs to S or is adjacent to a vertex of S. The cardinality of a smallest dominating set is called the dominating number of G and is denoted by γ(G). A graph G is said to be γ-vertex-critical if γ(G−v)<γ(G), for every vertex v in G.Let G be a 2-connected K_1,5-free 3-vertex-critical graph of odd order. For any vertex v∈V(G), we show that G−v has a perfect matching (except two graphs), which solves a conjecture posed by Ananchuen and Plummer [N. Ananchuen, M.D. Plummer, Matchings in 3-vertex critical graphs: The odd case, Discrete Math., 307 (2007) 1651-1658].     

Matchings in 3-vertex-critical graphs: The odd case

A subset of vertices D of a graph G is a dominating set for G if every vertex of G not in D is adjacent to one in D. The cardinality of any smallest dominating set in G is denoted by γ(G) and called the domination number of G. Graph G is said to be γ-vertex-critical if γ(G-v)<γ(G), for every vertex v in G. A graph G is said to be factor-critical if G-v has a perfect matching for every choice of v∈V(G).In this paper, we present two main results about 3-vertex-critical graphs of odd order. First we show that any such graph with positive minimum degree and at least 11 vertices which has no induced subgraph isomorphic to the bipartite graph K_1,5 must contain a near-perfect matching. Secondly, we show that any such graph with minimum degree at least three which has no induced subgraph isomorphic to the bipartite graph K_1,4 must be factor-critical. We then show that these results are best possible in several senses and close with a conjecture.     

Matching Properties in Total Domination Vertex Critical Graphs

A vertex subset S of a graph G = (V,E) is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number of G, denoted by γ _t (G), is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. A graph G with no isolated vertex is said to be total domination vertex critical if for any vertex v of G that is not adjacent to a vertex of degree one, γ _t (G?v) < γ _t (G). A total domination vertex critical graph G is called k-γ _t -critical if γ _t (G) = k. In this paper we first show that every 3-γ _t -critical graph G of even order has a perfect matching if it is K _1,5-free. Secondly, we show that every 3-γ _t -critical graph G of odd order is factor-critical if it is K _1,5-free. Finally, we show that G has a perfect matching if G is a K _1,4-free 4-γ _t (G)-critical graph of even order and G is factor-critical if G is a K _1,4-free 4-γ _t (G)-critical graph of odd order.     

On intransitive graph-restrictive permutation groups

Let Γ be a finite connected G-vertex-transitive graph and let v be a vertex of Γ. If the permutation group induced by the action of the vertex-stabiliser G _v on the neighbourhood Γ(v) is permutation isomorphic to L, then (Γ,G) is said to be locally L. A permutation group L is graph-restrictive if there exists a constant c(L) such that, for every locally L pair (Γ,G) and a vertex v of Γ, the inequality |G _v |≤c(L) holds. We show that an intransitive group is graph-restrictive if and only if it is semiregular.     

Graphs with small boundary

For a pair of vertices x and y in a graph G, we denote by d_G(x,y) the distance between x and y in G. We call x a boundary vertex of y if x and y belong to the same component and d_G(y,v)?d_G(y,x) for each neighbor v of x in G. A boundary vertex of some vertex is simply called a boundary vertex, and the set of boundary vertices in G is called the boundary of G, and is denoted by B(G).In this paper, we investigate graphs with a small boundary. Since a pair of farthest vertices are boundary vertices, |B(G)|?2 for every connected graph G of order at least two. We characterize the graphs with boundary of order at most three. We cannot give a characterization of graphs with exactly four boundary vertices, but we prove that such graphs have minimum degree at most six. Finally, we give an upper bound to the minimum degree of a connected graph G in terms of |B(G)|.     

The entire graph of a bridgeless connected plane graph is hamiltonian

In this paper we show that the entire graph of a bridgeless connected plane graph is hamiltonian, and that the entire graph of a plane block is hamiltonian connected and vertex pancyclic. In addition, we show that in any block G which is not a circuit, given a vertex v of G and a circuit k of G, there is a path p, suspended in G, such that p is a path in k of length at least 1 and G ? E(p) ? V₀(G ? E(p)) is a block which includes v.