Benzeneselenolates of Mercury(II). Crystal and Molecular Structures of [Hg(SePh)2] and (Bu4N)[Hg(SePh)3]

The reaction of dibenzenediselenide, (SePh)₂, with mercury in refluxing xylene gives bis(benzeneselenolato)mercury(II), [Hg(SePh)₂], in a good yield. (ⁿBu₄N)[Hg(SePh)₃] is obtained by the reaction of [Hg(SePh)₂] with a solution of [SePh]^– and (ⁿBu₄N)Br in ethanol. The solid state structures of both compounds have been determined by X-ray diffraction. The mercury atom in [Hg(SePh)₂] (space group C2, a = 7.428(2), b = 5.670(1), c = 14.796(4) Å, β = 103.60(1)°) is linearly co-ordinated by two selenium atoms (Hg–Se = 2.471(2) Å, Se–Hg–Se = 178.0(3)°). Additional weak interactions between the metal and selenium atoms of neighbouring molecules (Hg…Se = 3.4–3.6 Å) associate the [Hg(SePh)₂] units to layers. The crystal structure of (ⁿBu₄N)[Hg(SePh)₃] (space group P2₁/c, a = 9.741(1), b = 17.334(1), c = 21.785(1) Å, β = 95.27(5)°) consists of discrete complex anions and (ⁿBu₄N)⁺ counter ions. The coordination geometry of mercury is distorted trigonal-planar with Hg–Se distances ranging between 2.5 and 2.6 Å.     

Synthesis and Structure of the Clusters [Hg2(μ—SePh)2(SePh)2(PPh3)2] and [Hg3Br3(μ—SePh)3] · 2 DMSO

The compounds [Hg₂(μ—SePh)₂(SePh)₂(PPh₃)₂] ( I ) and [Hg₃Br₃(μ—SePh)₃] · 2 DMSO ( II ) are formed by reactions of [Hg(SePh)₂] with PPh₃ in THF( I ) or with HgBr₂ in DMSO ( II ) at room temperature. X—ray crystallography reveals that the cluster I consists of a distorted square built by each two Hg and Se atoms. The Hg atoms have almost tetrahedral co‐ordination environments formed by selenium atoms of two (μ‐^—SePh) ligands and Se and P atoms of terminal ^—SePh and PPh₃ ligands. The compound II is a six‐membered ring with alternating Hg and Se atoms in the chair conformation. Two DMSO molecules occupy positions below and above the [Hg₃Se₃] ring with the oxygen atoms directed to the centre of the ring.     

Synthese und Strukturen der selenolatoverbrückten Quecksilbercluster [Hg6(SePh)12(PtBu3)2] und (HPtBu3)2[Hg6(SePh)14]

Synthesis and Structures of the Selenolato-Bridged Mercury Clusters [Hg₆(SePh)₁₂(P t Bu₃)₂] and (HP t Bu₃)₂[Hg₆(SePh)₁₄] The reaction of HgCl₂ with PtBu₃ and PhSeSiMe₃ yields [Hg₆(SePh)₁₂(PtBu₃)₂] ( 1 ) and (HPtBu₃)₂[Hg₆(SePh)₁₄] ( 2 ). X-ray structural analysis of the compounds shows them to have similar Hg–Se cages with distorted tetrahedral coordination around mercury. The cages are built up from edge- and vertex-sharing distorted tetrahedra.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of [Cu20Se4(μ3‐SePh)12(PPh3)6] and [Ag(SePh)]∞

Reaction of lithium phenylselenothiolate, generated in situ from the reductive cleavage of PhSe‐SiMe₃ with alkyl lithium reagents and insertion of elemental sulfur, with triphenylphosphine solubilized CuCl affords the molecular cluster complex [Cu₂₀Se₄ (μ₃‐SePh)₁₂(PPh₃)₆] ( 1 ). The analogous reaction with AgCl yields the extended structure [Ag(SePh)]_∞ ( 2 ) in which an infinite layer of Ag^I atoms is capped on either side by μ₄‐SePh ligands. 1: space group P¯1, a = 17.9510(6), b = 18.1712(7), c = 31.4311(11) Å, a = 78.098(2), β = 82.905(2), γ = 70.012(2)°. 2: space group C2/c, a = 5.8762(6), b = 7.2989(7), c = 29.124(2) Å, β = 95.790(3)°.     

Synthese und Strukturen neuer selenido‐ und selenolatoverbrückter Kupfercluster: [Cu38Se13(SePh)12(dppb)6] (1), [Cu(dppp)2][Cu25Se4(SePh)18(dppp)2] (2), [Cu36Se5(SePh)26(dppa)4] (3), [Cu58Se16(SePh)24(dppa)6] (4) und [Cu3(SeMes)3(dppm)] (5)

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of new Selenido‐ and Selenolato‐bridged Copper Clusters: [Cu₃₈Se₁₃(SePh)₁₂(dppb)₆] (1), [Cu(dppp)₂][Cu₂₅Se₄(SePh)₁₈(dppp)₂] (2), [Cu₃₆Se₅(SePh)₂₆(dppa)₄] (3), [Cu₅₈Se₁₆(SePh)₂₄(dppa)₆] (4), and [Cu₃(SeMes)₃(dppm)] (5) The reactions of copper(I) chloride or copper(I) acetate with monodentate phosphine ligands (PR₃; R = organic group) and Se(SiMe₃)₂ have already lead to the formation of CuSe clusters with up to 146 copper and 73 selenium atoms. If the starting materials and the bidentate phosphine ligands (Ph₂P–(CH₂)_n–PPh₂, n = 1: dppm, n = 3: dppp, n = 4: dppb; Ph₂P–C≡C–PPh₂: dppa) and silylated chalcogen derivates are changed (RSeSiMe₃; R = Ph, Mes) a series of new CuSe clusters can be synthesized. From single crystal X‐ray structure analysis one can characterise [Cu₃₈Se₁₃(SePh)₁₂(dppb)₆] ( 1 ), [Cu(dppp)₂] · [Cu₂₅Se₄(SePh)₁₈(dppp)₂] ( 2 ), [Cu₃₆Se₅(SePh)₂₆(dppa)₄] ( 3 ), [Cu₅₈Se₁₆(SePh)₂₄(dppa)₆] ( 4 ) and [Cu₃(SeMes)₃(dppm)] ( 5 ). In this new class of CuSe clusters, compounds 1 and 4 possess a spherical cluster skeleton, wheras 2 and 3 have a layered cluster core.     

Investigating the Thermolysis Products of [Cd10Se4(SePh)12(P n Pr3)4] – The New Cluster Ion [Cd17Se4(SePh)28]2?

Analytical studies on the thermolysis products from [Cd₁₀Se₄(SePh)₁₂(PnPr₃)₄] are reported leading to the identification of the doubly negatively charged species [Cd₁₇Se₄(SePh)₂₈]²⁻. Electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI FT-ICR MS) has been successfully applied to analyse the composition of a polycrystalline precipitate after treatment with SePh⁻ in tetrahydrofuran (THF). Presumably, SePh⁻ reacts with the insoluble (polymeric) cluster product as a charging ligand leading to dissolved monomeric units of the cluster anion [Cd₁₇Se₄(SePh)₂₈]²⁻. This cluster anion could also be crystallized from solutions as [Na(thf)₂18-crown-6][Cd₁₇Se₄(SePh)₂₈] and [Na(dme)₃]₂[Cd₁₇Se₄(SePh)₂₈]. The experimental results promise a wider applicability of the charged ligand exchange method for the electrospray mass spectrometric characterization of neutral clusters and to obtain intensive monodisperse cluster ion beams for further gas-phase studies. Dedicated to Prof. Dieter Fenske on the occasion of his 65th birthday.     

Probing the Metal Composition of Ternary 12–12′‐16 Nanoclusters via Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

The reaction of [(3,5‐Me₂–C₅H₃N)₂Zn(SeSiMe₃)₂] with a solution of Cd(OAc)₂, Se(Ph)SiMe₃ and PPr₃ at low temperature was used to prepare single crystals of ternary group 12–12′‐16 nanoclusters with the composition [Zn_1.8Cd_8.2Se₄(SePh)₁₂(PPr₃)₄]. A ligand exchange reaction using Na[SePh] was performed to displace the neutral PPr₃ ligands. The resulting clusters were probed using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to determine the number of zinc and cadmium atoms in the cluster and compared to the all cadmium cluster [Cd₁₀Se₄(SePh)₁₂(PPr₃)₄]. The dianionic clusters [Zn_xCd_10–xSe₄(SePh)₁₄]^2– where x = 0, 1, 2 were assigned in the mass spectra, revealing that the clusters exhibit elemental distributions that are quite narrow in these experiments.     

[Sn9HgSn9]6–: An Intermetalloid Zintl Ion with Two Sn9 Connected by Heteroatom

The title compound [K([2,2,2]crypt)]₁₂[Sn₉]₂[Sn₉HgSn₉] has been obtained by reaction of elemental mercury with the binary phase K₄Sn₉ in ethylenediamine after addition of [2,2,2]crypt and layering with toluene. The X‐ray single crystal analysis shows that the compound consists of two isolated Sn₉ clusters and two Sn₉ clusters connected by a mercury atom.     

Synthese gemischt chalkogenido‐verbrückter Dirheniumkomplexe vom Typ Re2(μ‐ER)(μ‐E′R′)(CO)8 (E,E′ = S,Se, Te; R,R′ = org. Rest)

Synthesis of Mixed Chalcogenido‐Bridged Dirhenium Complexes of the Type Re₂(μ‐ER)(μ‐E′R′)(CO)₈ (E, E′ = S, Se, Te; R, R′ = org. Residue) Hydrido sulfido bridged complexes Re₂(μ‐H)(μ‐SR)(CO)₈ (R = Ph, naph, Cy) react with the base DBU to give the salts [DBUH][Re₂(μ‐SR)(CO)₈]. Upon addition of electrophiles R′E′Br (E′R = SPh, SePh, TePh) to the in situ prepared salts mixed chalcogenido bridged complexes Re₂(μ‐SR)(μ‐E′R′)(CO)₈ were formed. The structures of the new compounds Re₂(μ‐SCy)(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈ and Re₂(μ‐Snaph)(μ‐TePh)(CO)₈ were determined by single crystal X‐ray analyses. For the preparation of analogous selenido tellurido bridged complexes Re₂(μ‐SePh)(μ‐TeR)(CO)₈ the novel hydrido selenido bridged complex Re₂(μ‐H)(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈ was prepared from Re₂(CO)₈(NCMe)₂ and PhSeH. Its structure was determined by single crystal X‐ray analysis. Subsequent deprotonation with DBU gave in situ [DBUH][Re₂(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈] which upon addition of RTeBr (R = Ph, Buⁿ, Bu^t) formed the desired complexes Re₂(μ‐SePh)(μ‐TeR)(CO)₈. The reaction with Bu^tTeBr also yielded the novel spirocyclic complex (μ₄‐Te){Re₂(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈}₂ in low amounts. It was identified by single crystal X‐ray analysis. Re₂(μ‐SePh)(μ‐TeBu^t)(CO)₈ is oxidised in chloroform in the presence of air to give the novel complex (μ‐Te–Te‐μ){Re₂(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈}₂. All mixed chalcogenido bridged dirhenium complexes were proved to be dynamic in solution by ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The dynamic behaviour is based on the fast and permanent inversion of the sulfido and selenido bridges. The tellurido bridges are rigid on the time scale of ¹³C NMR spectroscopy.     

Linking Deltahedral Zintl Clusters with Conjugated Organic Building Blocks: Synthesis and Characterization of the Zintl Triad [R‐Ge9‐CHCH?CHCH‐Ge9‐R]4−

The accessibility of triads with deltahedral Zintl clusters in analogy to fullerene–linker–fullerene triads is another example for the close relationship between fullerenes and Zintl clusters. The compound {[K(2.2.2‐crypt)]₄[RGe₉‐CHCH CHCH‐Ge₉R]}(toluene)₂ (R=(2Z,4E)‐7‐amino‐5‐aza‐hepta‐2,4‐dien‐2‐yl), containing two deltahedral [Ge₉] clusters linked by a conjugated (1Z,3Z)‐buta‐1,3‐dien‐1,4‐diyl bridge, was synthesized through the reaction of 1,4‐bis(trimethylsilyl)butadiyne with K₄Ge₉ in ethylenediamine and crystallized after the addition of 2.2.2‐cryptand and toluene. The compound was characterized by single‐crystal structure analysis as well asNMR and IR spectroscopy.     

A New Chair‐shaped Conformation Containing HgHgOHgHgO: Synthesis and Structure of Hg4(L2)2(NO3)4 (L2 = morpholin‐4‐ylpyridin‐2‐ylmethyleneamine)

. The complex Hg₄(L²)₂(NO₃)₄ ( 1 ) (L² = morpholin‐4‐ylpyridin‐2‐ylmethyleneamine) has been synthesized and characterized by CHN analysis, IR, and UV/Vis spectroscopy. The crystal structure of 1 was determined using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structure of 1 contains four mercury atoms, four nitrate anions (two terminal and two bridge ones) and two L² ligand molecules. A chair shape, six‐membered ring is formed with the sequence OHgHgOHgHg built from Hg–Hg dumbbells and oxygen atoms from the nitrate co‐ligands. In the crystal structure, the asymmetric unit of the compound is built up by one‐half of the molecule. It contains the Hg₂²⁺ moiety with a mercury–mercury bonded core, in which one diimine ligand is coordinated to one of the mercury atoms. The nitrate anions act as anisobidentate and bidentate ligands.     

Linking Deltahedral Zintl Clusters with Conjugated Organic Building Blocks: Synthesis and Characterization of the Zintl Triad [R‐Ge9‐CHCHCHCH‐Ge9‐R]4−

The accessibility of triads with deltahedral Zintl clusters in analogy to fullerene–linker–fullerene triads is another example for the close relationship between fullerenes and Zintl clusters. The compound {[K(2.2.2‐crypt)]₄[RGe₉‐CH?CH? CH?CH‐Ge₉R]}(toluene)₂ (R=(2Z,4E)‐7‐amino‐5‐aza‐hepta‐2,4‐dien‐2‐yl), containing two deltahedral [Ge₉] clusters linked by a conjugated (1Z,3Z)‐buta‐1,3‐dien‐1,4‐diyl bridge, was synthesized through the reaction of 1,4‐bis(trimethylsilyl)butadiyne with K₄Ge₉ in ethylenediamine and crystallized after the addition of 2.2.2‐cryptand and toluene. The compound was characterized by single‐crystal structure analysis as well asNMR and IR spectroscopy.     

Time‐Resolved Assembly of Cluster‐in‐Cluster {Ag12}‐in‐{W76} Polyoxometalates under Supramolecular Control

We report the time‐resolved supramolecular assembly of a series of nanoscale polyoxometalate clusters (from the same one‐pot reaction) of the form: [H_(10+m)Ag₁₈Cl(Te₃W₃₈O₁₃₄)₂]_n, where n=1 and m=0 for compound 1 (after 4 days), n=2 and m=3 for compound 2 (after 10 days), and n=∞ and m=5 for compound 3 (after 14 days). The reaction is based upon the self‐organization of two {Te₃W₃₈} units around a single chloride template and the formation of a {Ag₁₂} cluster, giving a {Ag₁₂}‐in‐{W₇₆} cluster‐in‐cluster in compound 1 , which further aggregates to cluster compounds 2 and 3 by supramolecular Ag‐POM interactions. The proposed mechanism for the formation of the clusters has been studied by ESI‐MS. Further, control experiments demonstrate the crucial role that TeO₃^2?, Cl^?, and Ag⁺ play in the self‐assembly of compounds 1 – 3 .     

Formation of Crystalline CdSe Particles from a Single‐Source‐Precursor according to Ostwald's Rule

The formation of crystalline CdSe particles in the thermal degradation of Cd(SePh)₂·TMEDA (TMEDA = tetramethylethylenediamine) as a single‐source‐precursor was investigated by in‐situ powder X‐ray diffraction. It was shown that the primary grains were formed in the cubic zinc blende modification. After an increase in particle size by further annealing a phase transition to the thermodynamically favored hexagonal wurtzite type was detected. This behaviour indicates that, according to Ostwald's rule, the primary grains consist of the less stable polymorph due to the lower activation barrier of its formation. When the volume energy of the particles gets dominant over the surface energy, the metastable form is transformed and the system adopts the modification of lowest energy.     

Kinetically controlled,high-yield,direct synthesis of [Au25(SePh)18]−TOA+

In this article, we present a facile, direct, synthetic approach of preparing monodisperse [Au25(SePh)18]-nanoclusters in high yield. In this synthetic approach, two-phase Brust-Schiffrin method is used. Both PhSeH and NaBH4 should be added drop-wise to the solution of Au(III) at the same time. The formula and molecular purity of [Au25(SePh)18]-TOA+ clusters are characterized by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, NMR and TGA analysis. Furthermore, some critical parameters to obtain pure [Au25(SePh)18]-TOA+ are identified, including the NaBH4-to-Au ratio, the selenolate-to-Au ratio and the temperature. The facile, direct, high yield synthetic method can be widely applied in the theoretical research of Au clusters protected by selenol.     

Preparation and Crystal Structure of Au1—xSn1+yP14 and other Polyphosphides with HgPbP14‐Type Structure

The crystal structure of the known compound HgSnP₁₄ (HgPbP₁₄‐type, Pnma, Z = 4) was refined from single‐crystal X‐ray diffractometer data to a residual of R = 0.067 for 1470 structure factors and 83 variable parameters. This polyphosphide has a smaller cell volume than the isotypic compound CdSnP₁₄. For that reason it had been suggested earlier that the mercury atoms in HgSnP₁₄ will show a tendency for linear P—Hg—P coordination. This is not supported by the present structure refinement, which shows a distorted tetrahedral phosphorus coordination for the mercury atoms, very similar to that of the cadmium atoms in CdSnP₁₄. A brief literature survey shows that quite generally the mercury atoms have a smaller volume requirement than the cadmium atoms in intermetallics and more or less covalent compositions, in contrast to more ionic compounds, where the inverse relationship is observed. Chemical bonding in HgSnP₁₄ can be rationalized on the basis of the Zintl‐Klemm concept, resulting in the formula Hg⁺²Sn⁺²(P₁₄)^—4. Accordingly, the environment of the tin atoms shows the lone pair effect. Reactions of the elemental components aiming for the isotypic compounds CuSnP₁₄, CuPbP₁₄, AgSnP₁₄, AgPbP₁₄, AuSnP₁₄, and AuPbP₁₄ resulted in microcrystalline samples. The fibrous habit and the energy dispersive X‐ray fluorescence analyses of the products indicate the formation of these polyphosphides. Only for the gold‐tin compound was it possible to isolate a single crystal suitable for a structure refinement, which confirmed its HgPbP₁₄‐type structure: a = 1259.5(3) pm, b = 982.0(2) pm, c = 1056.2(3) pm, R = 0.046 for 1520 F values and 87 variables. The gold position was found with a lower occupancy, thus resulting in the two possible extreme formulas Au_0.852(4)SnP₁₄ and Au_0.64(1)Sn_1.36(1)P₁₄, depending of whether vacancies or a mixed Au/Sn occupancy is assumed for this position. An analysis of interatomic distances suggests the latter formula to be correct with tetravalent tin on the gold sites corresponding to the formula [(Au⁺¹)_0.64(1)(Sn⁺⁴)_0.36(1)]^+2.08(3)[SnP₁₄]^—2.     

Lanthanum tetrazinc,LaZn4

The structure of lanthanum tetrazinc, LaZn₄, has been determined from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data for the first time, approximately 70 years after its discovery. The compound exhibits a new structure type in the space group Cmcm, with one La atom and two Zn atoms occupying sites with m2m symmetry, and one Zn atom occupying a site with 2.. symmetry. The structure is closely related to the BaAl₄, La₃Al₁₁, BaNi₂Si₂ and CaCu₅ structure types, which can be presented as close‐packed arrangements of 18‐vertex clusters, in this case LaZn₁₈. The kindred structure types contain related 18‐vertex clusters around atoms of the rare earth or alkaline earth metal.     

Peculiar All‐Metal σ‐Aromaticity of the [Au2Sb16]4− Anion in the Solid State

Gas‐phase clusters are deemed to be σ‐aromatic when they satisfy the 4n+2 rule of aromaticity for delocalized σ electrons and fulfill other requirements known for aromatic systems. While the range of n values was shown to be quite broad when applied to short‐lived clusters found in molecular‐beam experiments, stability of all‐metal cluster‐like fragments isolated in condensed phase was previously shown to be mainly ascribed to two electrons (n=0). In this work, the applicability of this concept is extended towards solid‐state compounds by demonstrating a unique example of a storable compound, which was isolated as a stable [K([2.2.2]crypt)]⁺ salt, featuring a [Au₂Sb₁₆]^4? cluster core possessing two all‐metal aromatic AuSb₄ fragments with six delocalized σ electrons each (n=1). This discovery pushes the boundaries of the original idea of Kekulé and firmly establishes the usefulness of the σ‐aromaticity concept as a general idea for both small clusters and solid‐state compounds.     

20‐Di­cyano­methyl­ene‐5,8,11,14‐tetraoxa‐2,17‐di­thia­bi­cyclo­[16.4.1]­tricosa‐1(23),18,21‐triene and its mercury(II) dichloride complex

The structures of the title compound, C₂₀H₂₄N₂O₄S₂, and its mercury(II) dichloride complex, dichloro{20‐di­cyano­methyl­ene‐5,8,11,14‐tetraoxa‐2,17‐di­thia­bi­cyclo­[16.4.1]­tricosa‐1(23),18,­21‐tri­ene‐κ⁴O,κS¹⁷}mercury(II), [HgCl₂(C₂₀­H₂₄­N₂­O₄­S₂)], have been determined by X‐ray crystallographic analyses. The mercury(II) dichloride complex has two independent mol­ecules of [HgCl₂(C₂₀H₂₄N₂O₄S₂)] in the lattice. The mercury(II) ion has pentagonal bipyramidal coordination which involves one S atom, four O atoms and two Cl^? ions.     

Zinkselenid- und Zinktelluridcluster mit Phenylselenolat- und Phenyltellurolatliganden. Die Kristallstrukturen von [NEt4]2[Zn4Cl4(SePh)6], [NEt4]2[Zn8Cl4Se(SePh)12], [Zn8Se(SePh)14(PnPr3)2], [HPnPr2R]2[Zn8Cl4Te(TePh)12] (R = nPr,Ph) und [Zn10Te4(TePh)12(PR3)2] (R = nPr,Ph)

Zincselenide- and Zinctellurideclusters with Phenylselenolate- and Phenyltellurolateligands. The Crystal Structures of [NEt₄]₂[Zn₄Cl₄(SePh)₆], [NEt₄]₂[Zn₈Cl₄Se(SePh)₁₂], [Zn₈Se(SePh)₁₄(PⁿPr₃)₂], [HPⁿPr₂R]₂[Zn₈Cl₄Te(TePh)₁₂] (R = ⁿPr, Ph), and [Zn₁₀Te₄(TePh)₁₂(PR₃)₂] (R = ⁿPr, Ph) In the prescence of NEt₄Cl ZnCl₂ reacts with PhSeSiMe₃ or a mixture of PhSeSiMe₃/Se(SiMe₃)₂ to form the ionic complexes [NEt₄]₂[Zn₄Cl₄(SePh)₆] 1 or [NEt₄]₂[Zn₈Cl₄Se(SePh)₁₂] 2 respectively. The use of PⁿPr₃ instead of the quarternary ammonia salt leads in toluene to the formation of crystalline [Zn₈Se(SePh)₁₄(PⁿPr₃)₂] 3 . Reactions of ZnCl₂ with PhTeSiMe₃ and tertiary phosphines result in acetone in crystallisation of the ionic clusters [HPⁿPr₂R]₂[Zn₈Cl₄Te(TePh)₁₂] (R = ⁿPr 4 , Ph 5 ) and in THF of the uncharged [Zn₁₀Te₄(TePh)₁₂(PR₃)₂] (R = ⁿPr 6 , Ph 7 ). The structures of 1–7 were obtained by X-ray single crystal structure. ( 1 : space group P2₁/n (No. 14), Z = 4, a = 1212,4(2) pm, b = 3726,1(8) pm, c = 1379,4(3) pm β = 99,83(3)°; 2 space group P2₁/c (Nr. 14), Z = 4, a = 3848,6(8) pm, b = 1784,9(4) pm, c = 3432,0(7) pm, β = 97,78(3)°; 3 : space group Pnn2 (No. 34), Z = 2, a = 2027,8(4) pm, b = 2162,3(4) pm, c = 1668,5(3) pm; 4 : space group P2₁/c (No. 14), Z = 4, a = 1899,8(4) pm, b = 2227,0(5) pm, c = 2939,0(6) pm, β = 101,35(3)°; 5 : space group space group P2₁/n (No. 14), Z = 4, a = 2231,0(5) pm, b = 1919,9(4) pm, c = 3139,5(6) pm, β = 109,97(4)°; 6 : space group I4₁/a (No. 88), Z = 4, a = b = 2566,0(4) pm, c = 2130,1(4) pm; 7 : space group P1¯ (No. 2), Z = 2, a = 2068,4(4) pm, b = 2187,8(4) pm, c = 2351,5(5) pm, α = 70,36°, β = 84,62°, γ( = 63,63°)