New Ga/N‐based Active Lewis Pairs,Trifunctional Ga–Ga Compounds,Reactions with Cyanamide and Dual Insertion of Isocyanate

Hydrogallation of Me₃Si–C≡C–NR'₂ with R₂Ga–H (R = tBu, CH₂tBu, iBu) yielded Ga/N‐based active Lewis pairs, R₂Ga–C(SiMe₃)=C(H)–NR'₂ ( 7 ). The Ga and N atoms adopt cis‐positions at the C=C bonds and show weak Ga–N interactions. tBu₂GaH and Me₃Si–C≡C–N(C₂H₄)₂NMe afforded under exposure of daylight the trifunctional digallium(II) compound [MeN(C₂H₄)₂N](H)C=C(SiMe₃)Ga(tBu)–Ga(tBu)C(SiMe₃)=C(H)[N(C₂H₄)₂NMe] ( 8 ), which results from elimination of isobutene and H₂ and Ga–Ga bond formation. 8 was selectively obtained from the ynamine and [tBu(H)Ga–Ga(H)tBu]₂[HGatBu₂]₂. 7a (R = tBu; NR'₂ = 2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) and H₈C₄N–C≡N afforded the adduct tBu₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)(2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) · N≡C–NC₄H₈ ( 11 ) with the nitrile bound to gallium. The analogous ALP with harder Al atoms yielded an adduct of the nitrile dimer or oligomers of the nitrile at room temperature. The reaction of 7a with Ph–N=C=O led to the insertion of two NCO groups into the Ga–C_vinyl bond to yield a GaOCNCN heterocycle with Ga bound to O and N atoms ( 12 ).     

P‐Aminophosphaalkenes with C‐Isopropyldimethylsilyl Groups

Amination of the C‐isopropyldimethylsilyl P‐chlorophosphaalkene (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PCl ( 1 ) leads to the P‐aminophosphaalkenes (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(R)R′ (R, R′ = Me ( 2 ), R = H, R′ = nPr ( 3 ), R = H, R′ = iPr ( 4 ), R = H, R′ = tBu ( 5 ), R = H, R′ = 1‐Ada ( 6 ), R = H, R′ = CPh₃ ( 7 ), R = H, R′ = Ph ( 8 ), R = H, RR′ = 2,6‐iPr₂Ph (= DIP) ( 10 ), R = H, R′ = 2,4,6‐Me₃Ph (= Mes) ( 11 ), R = H, R′ = 2,4,6‐tBu₃Ph (= Mes*)] ( 12 ), R = H, R′ = SiMe₃ ( 13 ), and R, R′ = SiMe₂Ph (1 4 ). ³¹P‐NMR spectra confirm that phosphaalkenes 2 – 7 and 10 – 14 are monomeric in solution; the structures of 7 , 10 , and 12 were determined by X‐ray crystallography. Freshly prepared (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(H)Ph ( 8 ) is a monomer that dimerizes with (N→C) proton migration within several hours to the stable diazadiphosphetidine [(iPrMe₂Si)₂CHPNPh]₂ ( 9 ). NMR‐scale reactions of deprotonated 5 and 13 with tBuiPrPCl provide by P–P bond formation the P‐phosphanyl iminophosphoranes [(iPrMe₂Si)₂C=](RN=)PPtBu(iPr) [R = tBu ( 15 ), R = Me₃Si ( 17 )]. Deprotonated 5 and Me₃GeCl deliver by N–Ge bond formation the aminophosphaalkene (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(tBu)GeMe₃ ( 20 ), which with elemental selenium 5 undergoes (N→C) proton migration to form the alkyl(imino)(seleno)phosphorane [(iPrMe₂Si)₂CH](tBuN=)P=Se ( 21 ), which is a selenium‐bridged cyclic dimer in the solid state.     

Synthesis and characterization of aluminum(III) and tin(II) complexes supported by diiminophosphinate ligands and their application in ring‐opening polymerization catalysis of ε‐caprolactone

A series of Al(III) and Sn(II) diiminophosphinate complexes have been synthesized. Reaction of Ph(ArCH₂)P(?NBu^t)NHBu^t (Ar = Ph, 3 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 4 ) with AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) gave aluminum complexes [R₂Al{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (R = Me, Ar = Ph, 5 ; R = Me, Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 6 ; R = Et, Ar = Ph, 7 ; R = Et, Ar = quinolyl, 8 ). Lithiated 3 and 4 were treated with SnCl₂ to afford tin(II) complexes [ClSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (Ar = Ph, 9 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 10 ). Complex 9 was converted to [(Me₃Si)₂NSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 11 ) by treatment with LiN(SiMe₃)₂. Complex 11 was also obtained by reaction of 3 with [Sn{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂]. Complex 9 reacted with [LiOC₆H₄Bu^t‐4] to yield [4‐Bu^tC₆H₄OSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 12 ). Compounds 3–12 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of complexes 6 , 10 , and 11 were further characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The catalytic activity of complexes 5–8 , 11 , and 12 toward the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone (CL) was studied. In the presence of BzOH, the complexes catalyzed the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐CL in the activity order of 5 > 7 ≈ 8 > 6 ? 11 > 12 , giving polymers with narrow molecular weight distributions. The kinetic studies showed a first‐order dependency on the monomer concentration in each case. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 4621–4631, 2006     

Reactions of β-nitrostyrenes with tert-butylmercury halides in the presence of lodide lon

Photolysis of t-BuHgCl/KI with PhC(R²)C(R¹)NO₂ forms PhC(R²)C(R¹)Bu-t when R¹ = R² = H or in low yield when R¹ = H, R² = Ph. When R¹ ≠ H, or when R² = Ph, reactions with t-BuHgI/KI/hv proceed mainly via PhC(R²)C(R¹)NO₂·-, PhC(R²)C(R¹)N(OBu-t)O⁻HgX⁺, PhC(R²)C(R¹)NO and PhC(R²)C(R¹)N(OBu-t)HgX to form a variety of novel products including the dimeric bisnitronic esters ( 6 ) with R¹ = Me or Ph and R² = H; PhCH(R²)C(R¹) = NOBu-t with R¹ = Me or Ph and R² = H or R¹ = H and R² = Ph; PhC(R²)(OBu-t)C(R¹)NOH with R¹ = H or Me and R² = Ph; and 3-phenyl-2-R¹-indoles with R¹ = H, Me, Ph, PhS or t-BuS and R² = Ph. Nitrosoaromatics react with t-BuHgX in the dark to form ArN(OBu-t)(OBu-t)HgX⁺ which condenses with ArNO to form the azoxy compound. tert-Butyl radicals will add to RNO₂ [R = Ph, Ph₂CCH, Ph₂CC(Ph)] in the presence of t-BuHgI₂⁻ to form products derived from RN(OBu-t)O⁻HgI⁺.     

Synthesis and Reactivity towards DIBAL‐H of Cyclo‐Siloxanes cyclo‐[R2SiOSi(Ot‐Bu)2O]2, cyclo‐(t‐BuO)2Si(OSiR2)2O,and cyclo‐R2Si[OSi(Ot‐Bu)2]2O (R = Me,Ph)

The six‐, eight‐ and twelve‐membered cyclo‐siloxanes, cyclo‐[R₂SiOSi(Ot‐Bu)₂O]₂ (R = Me ( 1 ), Ph ( 2 )), cyclo‐(t‐BuO)₂Si(OSiR₂)₂O (R = Me ( 3 ), Ph ( 4 )), cyclo‐R₂Si[OSi(Ot‐Bu)₂]₂O (R = Me ( 5 ), Ph ( 6 )) and cyclo‐[(t‐BuO)₂Si(OSiMe₂)₂O]₂ ( 3a ) were synthesized in high yields by the reaction of (t‐BuO)₂Si(OH)₂ and [(t‐BuO)₂SiOH]₂O with R₂SiCl₂ and (R₂SiCl)₂O (R = Me, Ph). Compounds 1 — 6 were characterized by solution and solid‐state ²⁹Si NMR spectroscopy, electrospray mass spectrometry and osmometric molecular weight determination. The molecular structure of 4 has been determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction and features a six‐membered cyclo‐siloxane ring that is essentially planar. The reduction of 1 — 6 with i‐Bu₂AlH (DIBAL‐H) led to the formation of the metastable aluminosiloxane (t‐BuO)₂Si(OAli‐Bu₂)₂ ( 7 ) along with Me₂SiH₂ and Ph₂SiH₂.     

Disilene R*RSi=SiRR* (R* = SitBu3) mit siliciumgebundenen Me‐ und Ph‐Gruppen R: Bildung,Nachweis, Thermolyse,Struktur: Verbindungen des Siliciums. 154 [1]. Ungesättigte Siliciumverbindungen. 61 [1]

Compounds of Silicon. 154 [1]. Unsaturated Silicon Compounds. 61 [1] Disilenes R*RSi=SiRR* (R* = SitBu₃) with Silicon‐Bound Me and Ph Groups R: Formation, Identification, Thermolysis, Structure Dehalogenations of the 1, 2‐disupersilylsilanes R*MeBrSi—SiBrMeR* (gauche : trans 1.15 : 1.00) and R*PhClSi—SiBrPhR* (gauche : trans = 2.7 : 1.0) in THF with equimolar amounts of NaR* (R* = SitBu₃ = Supersilyl) lead at —78 °C under exchange of bromine for sodium to the disilanides R*MeBrSi—SiNaMeR* and R*PhClSi—SiNaPhR* which are identified by protonation and bromination (formation of R*RXSi—SiX′RR* with R = Me, X/X′ = Br/H, Br/Br: gauche : trans = 1.15 : 1.00, and R = Ph, X/X′ = Cl/H, Cl/Br: gauche : trans = 2.7 : 10, respectively). These eliminate at about —55 °C NaHal with formation of non‐isolable trans‐R*MeSi=SiMeR* and isolable trans‐R*PhSi=SiPhR*. The intermediate existence of the disilene R*MeSi=SiMeR* could be proved by trapping it with PhC≡CPh (formation of a [2+2] cycloadduct; X‐ray structure analysis). In the absence of trapping agents, R*MeSi=SiMeR* decomposes into a mixture of substances, the main product of which is R*MeHSi—SiMeR*—SiHMeR*. The light yellow disilene R*PhSi=SiPhR* has been characterized by spectroscopy (Raman: ν(Si=Si) = 592 cm^—1; UV/VIS: λ_max = 398 nm with ∈ = 1560; ²⁹Si‐NMR: δ(>Si=) = 128 ppm) and by X‐ray structure analysis (planar central framework >Si=Si<; Si=Si distance 2.182Å). R*PhSi=SiPhR* is reduced by lithium in THF with formation of a red radical anion which decomposes at room temperature into hitherto non‐identified products. At about 70 °C, R*PhSi=SiPhR* decomposes with intramolecular insertion of the Si=Si group into a C—H bond of a Ph group and with change of configuration of the R* groups, which at first are trans then cis‐positioned (X‐ray structure analysis of the thermolysis product).     

Reactivity of an N,N‐Chelated Germylene Toward Substituted Alkynes,Alkenes, and Allenes

Treatment of N,N‐chelated germylene [(iPr)₂NB(N‐2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃)₂]Ge ( 1 ) with ferrocenyl alkynes containing carbonyl functionalities, FcC≡CC(O)R, resulted in [2+2+2] cyclization and formation of the respective ferrocenylated 3‐Fc‐4‐C(O)R‐1,2‐digermacyclobut‐3‐enes 2 – 4 [R = Me ( 2 ), OEt ( 3 ) and NMe₂ ( 4 )] bearing intact carbonyl substituents. In contrast, the reaction between 1 and PhC(O)C≡CC(O)Ph led to activation of both C≡C and C=O bonds producing bicyclic compound containing two five‐membered 1‐germa‐2‐oxacyclopent‐3‐ene rings sharing one C–C bond, 4,8‐diphenyl‐3,7‐dioxa‐2,6‐digermabicyclo[3.3.0]octa‐4,8‐diene ( 5 ). With N‐methylmaleimide containing an analogous C(O)CH=CHC(O) fragment, germylene 1 reacted under [2+2+2] cyclization involving the C=C double bond, producing 1,2‐digermacyclobutane 6 with unchanged carbonyl moieties. Finally, 1 selectively added to the terminal double bond in allenes CH₂=C=CRR′ giving rise to 3‐(=CRR′)‐1,2‐digermacyclobutanes [R/R′ = Me/Me ( 7 ), H/OMe ( 8 )] bearing an exo‐C=C double bond. All compounds were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C{¹H} NMR, IR and Raman spectroscopy and the molecular structures of 3 , 4 , 5 , and 8 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The redox behavior of ferrocenylated derivatives 2 – 4 was studied by cyclic voltammetry.     

Complexation and Versatile Reactivity of a Highly Lewis Acidic Cationic Mg Complex with Alkynes and Phosphines

[(BDI)Mg⁺][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 1 ; BDI=CH[C(CH₃)NDipp]₂; Dipp=2,6-diisopropylphenyl) was prepared by reaction of (BDI)MgnPr with [Ph₃C⁺][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻]. Addition of 3-hexyne gave [(BDI)Mg⁺ ⋅ (EtC≡CEt)][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻]. Single-crystal X-ray analysis, NMR investigations, Raman spectra, and DFT calculations indicate a significant Mg-alkyne interaction. Addition of the terminal alkynes PhC≡CH or Me₃SiC≡CH led to alkyne deprotonation by the BDI ligand to give [(BDI-H)Mg⁺(C≡CPh)]₂ ⋅ 2 [B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 2 , 70 %) and [(BDI-H)Mg⁺(C≡CSiMe₃)]₂ ⋅ 2 [B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 3 , 63 %). Addition of internal alkynes PhC≡CPh or PhC≡CMe led to [4+2] cycloadditions with the BDI ligand to give {Mg⁺C(Ph)=C(Ph)C[C(Me)=NDipp]₂}₂ ⋅ 2 [B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 4 , 53 %) and {Mg⁺C(Ph)=C(Me)C[C(Me)=NDipp]₂}₂ ⋅ 2 [B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 5 , 73 %), in which the Mg center is N,N,C-chelated. The (BDI)Mg⁺ cation can be viewed as an intramolecular frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) with a Lewis acidic site (Mg) and a Lewis (or Brønsted) basic site (BDI). Reaction of [(BDI)Mg⁺][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 1 ) with a range of phosphines varying in bulk and donor strength generated [(BDI)Mg⁺ ⋅ PPh₃][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 6 ), [(BDI)Mg⁺ ⋅ PCy₃][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 7 ), and [(BDI)Mg⁺ ⋅ PtBu₃][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 8 ). The bulkier phosphine PMes₃ (Mes=mesityl) did not show any interaction. Combinations of [(BDI)Mg⁺][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] and phosphines did not result in addition to the triple bond in 3-hexyne, but during the screening process it was discovered that the cationic magnesium complex catalyzes the hydrophosphination of PhC≡CH with HPPh₂, for which an FLP-type mechanism is tentatively proposed.     

Electronic Push–Pull Modulation by Peripheral Substituents in Pentaaryl Boroles

Establishing access to a bulky tetraaryl dilithiobutadiene (Ph*C)₄Li₂ (Ph*=3,5-tBu₂(C₆H₃)) allowed for the synthesis of five-membered heterocycles with incorporated main-group elements. Along with an amino borole, a set of substituted pentaaryl boroles (Ph*C)₄BAr has been synthesized. The examination of their absorption spectra and computational studies by means of DFT granted insight into the influence of peripheral substituents on the electronic features of the parent pentaphenyl borole (PhC)₄BPh. Introduction of the more electron-rich Ph* residue at the carbon atoms increases the HOMO energy, redshifting the visible π/π*-absorption bands compared with the parent pentaphenyl borole. The influence on the frontier orbitals of three different boron-bound aryls with electronically modulating substituents in the remote 3,5-positions Ar=3,5-R₂-C₆H₃ (R=Me, H, CF₃) was studied. The substituents were found to increase (+I effect, Me) or decrease (−I effect, CF₃) the LUMO energy, thus directly affecting the visible absorption spectra. This represents the first study on HOMO–LUMO-gap adjustments by a combined push–pull approach of a substituted pentaphenylborole.     

The Reactions of Carbon Monoxide with Silyl and Silenyl Lithium – Synthesis and Isolation of the First Stable Tetra‐Silyl Di‐Ketyl Biradical and 1‐Silaallenolate Lithium

Reactions of carbon monoxide (CO) with tBu₂MeSiLi and (E)‐(tBu₂MeSi)(tBuMe₂Si)C=Si(SiMetBu₂)Li?2 THF ( 4 ) were studied both experimentally and computationally. Reaction of tBu₂MeSiLi with CO in hexane yields the first stable tetra‐silyl di‐ketyl biradical [(tBu₂MeSi)₂COLi]^.₂ ( 3 ). Reaction of 4 with CO yields selectively and quantitatively the first reported 1‐silaallenolate, (tBu₂MeSi)(tBuMe₂Si)C=C=Si(SiMetBu₂)OLi?THF ( 5 ). Both 3 and 5 were characterized by X‐ray crystallography and biradical 3 also by EPR spectroscopy. Silaallenolate 5 reacts with Me₃SiCl to produce siloxy substituted 1‐silaallene (tBu₂MeSi)(tBuMe₂Si)C=C=Si(SiMetBu₂)OSiMe₃. The reaction of 4 with CO provides a new route to 1‐silaallenes. The mechanisms of the reactions of tBuMe₂SiLi and of 4 with CO were studied by DFT calculations.     

Four-coordinate trispyrazolylboratomanganese and -iron complexes with a pyrazolato co-ligand: syntheses and properties as oxidation catalysts

A series of complexes of the type [(Tp^R1,R2)M(X)] (Tp=trispyrazolylborato) with R¹/R² combinations Me/tBu, Ph/Me, iPr/iPr, Me/Me and for M=Mn or Fe coordinating [Pz^Me,tBu]^? (Pz=pyrazolato) or Cl^? as co‐ligand X has been synthesised. Although the chloride complexes were very unreactive and stable in air, the pyrazolato series was far more reactive in contact with oxidants like O₂ and tBuOOH. The [(Tp^R1,R2)M(Pz^Me,tBu)] complexes proved to be active pre‐catalysts for the oxidation of cyclohexene with tBuOOH, reaching turnover frequencies (TOFs) ranging between moderate and good in comparison to other manganese catalysts. Cyclohexene‐3‐one and cyclohexene‐3‐ol were always found to represent the main products, with cyclohexene oxide occasionally formed as a side product. The ratios of the different oxidation products varied with the reaction conditions: in the case of a peroxide/alkene ratio of 4:1, considerably more ketone than alcohol was obtained and cyclohexene oxide formation was almost negligible, whereas a ratio of 1:10 led to a significant increase of the alcohol proportion and to the formation of at least small amounts of the epoxide. Pre‐treatment of the dissolved [(Tp^R1,R2)M(Pz^Me,tBu)] pre‐catalysts with O₂ led to product distributions and TOFs that were very similar to those found in the absence of O₂, so that it may be argued that tBuOOH and O₂ both lead to the same active species. The results of EPR spectroscopy and ESI‐MS suggest that the initial product of the reaction of [(Tp^Me,Me)Mn(Pz^Me,tBu)] with O₂ contains a Mn^III(O)₂Mn^IV core. Prolonged exposure to O₂ leads to a different dinuclear complex containing three O‐bridges and resulting in different TOFs/product distributions. Analogous findings were made for other complexes and formation of these overoxidised products may explain the deviation of the catalytic performances if the reactions are carried out in an O₂ atmosphere.     

Two Different Structural Motifs Observed for Dimeric Dialkylaluminum and Dialkylgallium Alkynides [R2E‐C≡C‐C6H5]2

The dialkylaluminum and dialkylgallium alkynides [R₂E‐C≡C‐R′]₂ (R = Me, CMe₃; E = Al, Ga; R′ = Ph) containing C≡C triple bonds attached to their central aluminum or gallium atoms are easily obtained by the reactions of dialkylelement chlorides with lithium alkynides or by treatment of the corresponding alkyne R‐C≡C‐H with dialkylaluminum or dialkylgallium hydrides. The first reaction is favored by the precipitation of LiCl, the second one by the formation of elemental hydrogen. All products form dimers in which the carbanionic carbon atoms of the alkynido groups adopt bridging positions, but, interestingly, different types of molecular structures were observed depending on the steric demand of the substituents terminally attached to the aluminum or gallium atoms. The small methyl substituents gave structures in which the aluminum or gallium atoms seemed to be side‐on coordinated by the C≡C triple bonds of almost linear E‐C≡C groups. In contrast, the more bulky tert‐butyl groups forced an arrangement in which the C≡C triple bonds were perpendicular to the E‐E axis of the molecules. Different bonding modes result, which were analyzed by quantum‐chemical calculations.     

Alternative Synthesis and Structures of C‐monoacetylenic Phosphaalkenes

An alternative synthesis of C‐monoacetylenic phosphaalkenes trans‐Mes*P=C(Me)(C≡CR) (Mes* = 2, 4, 6‐^tBu₃Ph, R = Ph, SiMe₃) from C‐bromophosphaalkenes cis‐Mes*P=C(Me)Br using standard Sonogashira coupling conditions is described. Crystallographic studies confirm cis‐trans isomerization of the P=C double bond during Pd‐catalyzed cross coupling, leading exclusively to trans‐acetylenic phosphaalkenes. Crystallographic studies of all synthesized compounds reveal the extend of π‐conjugation over the acetylene and P=C π‐systems.     

Hydrogallierungsreaktionen mit den Monoalkinen H5C6‐C≡C‐SiMe3 und H5C6‐C≡C‐CMe3 – cis/trans‐Isomerie und Substituentenaustausch

Hydrogallation Reactions Involving the Monoalkynes H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃ and H₅C₆‐C≡C‐CMe₃ – cis/trans Isomerisation and Substituent Exchange Phenyl‐trimethylsilylethyne, H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃, reacted with different dialkylgallium hydrides, R₂Ga‐H (R = Me, Et, nPr, iPr, tBu), by the addition of one Ga‐H bond to its C≡C triple bond (hydrogallation). The gallium atoms attacked selectively those carbon atoms, which were also attached to trimethylsilyl groups. The cis arrangement of Ga and H across the resulting C=C double bonds resulted only for the sterically most shielded di(tert‐butyl)gallium derivative, while in all other cases spontaneous cis/trans rearrangement occurred with the quantitative formation of the trans addition products. The diethyl compound Et₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅ ( 2 ) gave by substituent exchange the secondary products EtGa[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₂ ( 7 , Z,Z) and Ga[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₃ ( 8 ). Interestingly, compound 8 has two alkenyl groups with a Z configuration, while the third C=C double bond has the cis arrangement of Ga and H (E configuration). The reversibility of the cis/trans isomerisation of hydrogallation products was observed for the first time. tert‐Butyl‐phenylethyne gave the simple addition product, R₂Ga(C₆H₅)=C(H)‐CMe₃ ( 9 ), only with di(n‐propyl)gallium hydride.     

Heavy Chains: Synthesis,Reactivity and Decomposition of Interpnictogen Chains with Terminal Diaryl Bismuth Fragments

In this work, we report the preparation of multiple interpnictogen chain compounds with three consecutive pnictogen atoms and terminal Ar₂Bi fragments (Ar=Ph, Mes). Symmetrical compounds of the form Ar₂Bi−E(tBu)−Bi₂Ar ( 1 : Ar=Ph, E=P; 2 : Ar=Ph, Mes, E=As) as well as ternary interpnictogen compounds of the form Ar₂Bi−E¹(tBu)−E²tBu₂ (Ar=Ph, Mes; 4 : E¹=P, E²=As; 5 : E¹=P, E²=Sb; 6 : E¹=As, E²=P) were prepared. The decomposition in solution at room temperature and under the influence of light was studied for compounds 1 – 6 . The reactivity of 1_Ph and 2_Ph with the small N-heterocyclic carbene 1,3,4,5-tetramethylimidazol-2-ylidene (Me₂IMe) was also studied. In the case of 1_Ph , the formation and consecutive decomposition of Me₂IMe=PtBu ( 8 ) was observed in solution. Hence, it was shown that 1_Ph can react as a “masked phosphinidene”. In the case of 2_Ph , no reaction with Me₂IMe was observed. All isolated compounds were analysed by NMR and IR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, elemental analysis and single-crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Front Cover: Small-Molecule Activation by Heteroleptic Metallasilylenes (Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2/2023)

We report on reactions of heteroleptic metallasilylenes L¹(Cl)MSiL² (M=Al 1 , Ga 2 , L¹=HC[C(Me)NDipp]₂, Dipp=2,6-ⁱPr₂C₆H₃; L²=PhC(N^tBu)₂) with CO₂, N₂O, and Me₃SiN₃, yielding the corresponding carbonate complexes L¹(Cl)MOSi(CO₃-κ²O,O−)L² (M=Al 3 , Ga 4 ), silanoic esters L¹(Cl)MOSi(O)L² (M=Al 5 , Ga 6 ), and silaimine L¹(Cl)GaSi(NSiMe₃)L² ( 8 ), whereas {L²Si[N(SiMe₃)Al(Cl)C(Me)NDipp][CHC(Me)N(Dipp)]} 7 was formed by C−C bond cleavage of the L¹ ligand. Compounds 3 – 8 were characterized by NMR (¹H, ¹³C) and IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and single crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Terminally Dimetallated N,N′‐Dimethylpiperazines with Doubly Spirocyclic Structures

Dilithiated N,N′‐dimethyl‐piperazine, LiCH₂N(CH₂CH₂)₂ NCH₂Li ( 2 ) was prepared by transmetallation of N,N′‐bis(trimethylstannylmethyl)‐piperazine ( 1 ) with ⁿBuLi and was isolated as a highly pyrophoric yellowish powder in high yield. Compound 2 was characterized by elemental analysis and was reacted as difunctional aminomethylating reagent with dialkyl‐earth metal chlorides, R₂MCl (M = Al, Ga; R = Me, ^tBu) which resulted in the formation of spirocyclic adducts of N,N′‐bis(dialkylmetallamethyl)‐piperazine and unreacted dialkylmetal chlorides, [(Me₂AlCl)Me₂AlCH₂N(CH₂CH₂)₂NCH₂AlMe₂(ClAlMe₂)] ( 3 ) and [(^tBu₂GaCl)^tBu₂GaCH₂N(CH₂CH₂)₂NCH₂Ga^tBu₂(ClGa^tBu₂)] ( 4 ) with five‐membered rings. Compounds 1 , 3 and 4 were identified by NMR‐spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn for 1 , ²⁷Al for 3 ), mass spectra (EI, for 1 ) and by crystal structure determinations.     

Organo‐ and Hydrogelators Based on Luminescent Monocationic Terpyridyl Platinum(II) Complexes with Biphenylacetylide Ligands

A series of phosphorescent terpyridyl platinum(II) complexes with ancillary biphenylacetylide ligands, namely, [(R₃tpy)PtC≡C(biphenyl)]X (R=tBu, H, or Et₂N; tpy=2,2′;6′,2′′‐terpyridyl; X is an anion) were synthesized and structurally characterized by various spectroscopic techniques and X‐ray diffraction methods. Despite a lack of long alkyl chain(s) or hydrogen‐bonding motif(s), complexes [(tpy)PtC≡C(biphenyl)]Cl and [(tBu₃tpy)PtC≡C(biphenyl)]X (X=Cl, ClO₄, PF₆, or BF₄) were found to gelate water and organic solvents, respectively. The self‐aggregation of these complexes in solutions and the resulting gels were investigated with variable‐temperature (VT) ¹H NMR spectroscopy, polarized optical microscopy, and absorption/emission spectroscopy. SEM micrographs on dry gels revealed entangled nanofibers with diameters of 20–40 nm and lengths of tens of micrometers. Powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) study revealed various degrees of crystallinity of these fibrillar nanostructures. The substituents on both the terpyridyl and acetylide ligands and counterion of these complexes play a profound but concerted role in tuning the intermolecular metal???metal and/or π–π interactions, and hence the gelation properties.     

Isolation and Characterization,Including by X‐ray Crystallography,of Contact and Solvent‐Separated Ion Pairs of Silenyl Lithium Species

Reaction of bromoacylsilane 1 (pink solution) with tBu₂MeSiLi (3.5 equiv) in a 4:1 hexane:THF solvent mixture at ?78 °C to room temperature yields the solvent separated ion pair (SSIP) of silenyl lithium E‐[(tBuMe₂Si)(tBu₂MeSi)C=Si(SiMetBu₂)]^? [Li?4THF]⁺ 2 a (green–blue solution). Removal of the solvent and addition of benzene converts 2 a into the corresponding contact ion pair (CIP) 2 b (violet–red solution) with two THF molecules bonded to the lithium atom. The 2 a ? 2 b interconversion is reversible upon THF? benzene solvent change. Both 2 a and 2 b were characterized by X‐ray crystallography, NMR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, and theoretical calculations. The degree of dissociation of the Si?Li bond has a large effect on the visible spectrum (and thus color) and on the silenylic ²⁹Si NMR chemical shift, but a small effect on the molecular structure. This is the first report of the X‐ray molecular structure of both the SSIP and the CIP of any R₂E=E′RM species (E=C, Si; E′=C, Si; M=metal).     

Isolation and Characterization,Including by X‐ray Crystallography,of Contact and Solvent‐Separated Ion Pairs of Silenyl Lithium Species

Reaction of bromoacylsilane 1 (pink solution) with tBu₂MeSiLi (3.5 equiv) in a 4:1 hexane:THF solvent mixture at −78 °C to room temperature yields the solvent separated ion pair (SSIP) of silenyl lithium E‐[(tBuMe₂Si)(tBu₂MeSi)C=Si(SiMetBu₂)]⁻ [Li⋅4THF]⁺ 2 a (green–blue solution). Removal of the solvent and addition of benzene converts 2 a into the corresponding contact ion pair (CIP) 2 b (violet–red solution) with two THF molecules bonded to the lithium atom. The 2 a ⇌ 2 b interconversion is reversible upon THF⇌ benzene solvent change. Both 2 a and 2 b were characterized by X‐ray crystallography, NMR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, and theoretical calculations. The degree of dissociation of the Si−Li bond has a large effect on the visible spectrum (and thus color) and on the silenylic ²⁹Si NMR chemical shift, but a small effect on the molecular structure. This is the first report of the X‐ray molecular structure of both the SSIP and the CIP of any R₂E=E′RM species (E=C, Si; E′=C, Si; M=metal).