Interaction of RuIII(EDTA) with cellular thiols and O2: biological implications thereof

Reaction of [Ru^III(EDTA)(CyS)]^2? (edta^4? = ethylenediaminetetraacetate; CySH = cysteine) with molecular oxygen (O₂) has been studied as a function of pH (4.0–8.0) and cysteine concentration (0.2–2.0 mM) at room temperature (25 °C). Biological activities of the [Ru(EDTA)]/CySH/O₂ system pertaining to cleavage of supercoiled plasmid DNA to its nicked open circular form has been explored in this work. Results are discussed in regard to the reaction of the ruthenium(III)-complex with molecular oxygen) and a working mechanism is proposed for the biological activities of the ruthenium(III)-complex in the presence of O₂.     

REDOX AND pH-INDUCED SWITCHING OF THE COORDINATION SITES IN THE 3-HYDROXYPICOLINATE RUTHENIUM(III)-edta COMPLEX

Abstract

Ruthenium(III)-edta reacts with the 3-hydroxypicolinate ligand (Hhpic^?) at pH 5, yielding the practically colorless [Ru^III(edta)(κN, κO-Hhpic)]^2? complex (H₂hpic = 3-hydroxypicolinic acid; H₄edta = ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid). Above pH 9, deprotonation of the phenolic group promotes an intramolecular linkage isomerization process, generating the faint red [Ru^III(edta) (κO, κO-hpic)]^3? complex. Both isomers can be electrochemically reduced, converting into a single deep red [Ru^II(edta)(κN, κO-Hhpic)]^3? complex strongly stabilized by ruthenium-to-pyridinecarboxylate d _π → p*_π charge-transfer interactions. The observed distinct binding properties as a function of the oxidation states and pH have been rationalized based on semiempirical theoretical calculations for the complexes.     

Oxidation of captopril by hydrogen peroxide and peroxomonosulfate ion catalyzed by a ruthenium(III) complex: kinetic and mechanistic studies

The complex [Ru^III(edta)(H₂O)]^? (edta^4? = ethylenediaminetetraacetate) catalyzes the oxidation of captopril (CapSH) using primary oxidants, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and peroxomonosulfate (\( {\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - } \)). The kinetics of the oxidation reaction were studied as a function of both oxidant (H₂O₂, \( {\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - } \)) and substrate (CapSH) concentrations using stopped-flow and rapid scan stopped-flow techniques. Spectral and kinetic data are suggestive of a pathway involving rapid formation of the intermediate complex [Ru^III(edta)(CapS)]^2? followed by direct attack of the oxidant (H₂O₂ or \( {\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - } \)) at the S atom of the coordinated CapS^?. ESI–MS and HPLC analysis of the reaction products showed that captopril disulfide (CapSSCap) is the major oxidation product. A probable mechanism in agreement with the spectral and kinetic data is presented.     

Oxidation of Ru(III)‐Bound Thiocyanate with Peroxomonosulfate: Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies

The reaction of [Ru^III(edta)(SCN)]^2? (edta^4? = ethylenediaminetetraacetate; SCN^? = thiocyanate ion) with the peroxomonosulfate ion (HSO₅^?) has been studied by using stopped‐flow and rapid scan spectrophotometry as a function of [Ru^III(edta)], [HSO₅^?], and temperature (15–30ºC) at constant pH 6.2 (phosphate buffer). Spectral analyses and kinetic data are suggestive of a pathway in which HSO₅^? effects the oxidation of the coordinated SCN^? by its direct attack at the S‐atom (of SCN^?) coordinated to the Ru^III(edta). The high negative value of entropy of activation (ΔS^≠ = ?90 ± 6 J mol^?1 deg^?1) is consistent with the values reported for the oxygen atom transfer process involving heterolytic cleavage of the O‐O bond in HSO₅^?. Formation of SO₄^2?, SO₃^2?, and OCN^? was identified as oxidation products in ESI‐MS experiments. A detailed mechanism in agreement with the spectral and kinetic data is presented.     

[RuIII(EDTA)(H2O)]− catalyzed oxidation of biologically important thiols by H2O2

[Ru^III(EDTA)(H₂O)]^? (EDTA^4? = ethylenediaminetetraacetate) catalyzes the oxidation of biological thiols, RSH (RSH = cysteine, glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, penicillamine) using H₂O₂ as precursor oxidant. The kinetics of the oxidation process were studied spectrophotometrically as a function of [Ru^III(EDTA)(H₂O)]^?, [H₂O₂], [RSH], and pH (4–8). Spectral analyses and kinetic data are suggestive of a catalytic pathway in which the RSH reacts with [Ru^III(EDTA)] catalyst complex to form [Ru^III((EDTA)(SR)]^2? intermediate species. In the subsequent reaction step the oxidant, H₂O₂, reacts directly with the coordinated S of the [Ru^III((EDTA)(SR)]^2? intermediate leading to formation of the disulfido (RSSR) oxidation product (identified by HPLC and ESI-MS studies) of thiols (RSH). Based on the experimental results, a working mechanism involving oxo-transfer from H₂O₂ to the coordinated thiols is proposed for the catalytic oxidation.     

Comparative Study of Ruthenium(II) and Ruthenium(III) Complexes with the Ligand dmbpy (dmbpy = 4, 4′‐Dimethyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine)

The complex cis‐[Ru^III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂](PF₆) ( 2 ) (dmbpy = 4, 4′‐dimethyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine) was obtained from the reaction of cis‐[Ru^II(dmbpy)₂Cl₂] ( 1 ) with ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate followed by precipitation with saturated ammonium hexafluoridophosphate. The ¹H NMR spectrum of the Ru^III complex confirms the presence of paramagnetic metal atoms, whereas that of the Ru^II complex displays diamagnetism. The ³¹P NMR spectrum of the Ru^III complex shows one signal for the phosphorus atom of the PF₆^– ion. The perspective view of each [Ru^II/III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂]^0/+ unit manifests that the ruthenium atom is in hexacoordinate arrangement with two dmbpy ligands and two chlorido ligands in cis position. As the oxidation state of the central ruthenium metal atom becomes higher, the average Ru–Cl bond length decreases whereas the Ru–N (dmbpy) bond length increases. The cis‐positioned dichloro angle in Ru^III is 1.3° wider than that in the Ru^II. The dihedral angles between pair of planar six‐membered pyridyl ring in the dmbpy ligand for the Ru^II are 4.7(5)° and 5.7(4)°. The observed inter‐planar angle between two dmbpy ligands in the Ru^II is 89.08(15)°, whereas the value for the Ru^III is 85.46(20)°.     

Redox properties of ruthenium(III/II)–edta complexes with o-phenylenediamine and o-benzoquinone diimine ligands

The reaction of [Ru^III(edta)(H₂O)]⁻ with o-phenylenediamine (opda) in water, under aerobic conditions, affords the diamagnetic [Ru^II(edta)(bqdi)]²⁻ product (where edta stands for the ethylenediaminetetraacetate co-ligand, and bqdi represents the non-innocent o-benzoquinone α,α^′-diimine ligand). In the current communication, the redox chemistry of this system in aqueous solution is described in details on the basis of electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical studies. The electrochemical behavior of “free” opda is rather complicated with further chemical reactions following the irreversible two-proton/two-electron oxidation (opda→bqdi+2e⁻+2H⁺), whereas its complex is electrochemically well-behaved with two chemically reversible redox processes: the monoelectronic couple associated with the metal ion (Ru^III/Ru^II) and another bielectronic step centered on the coordinated ligand (bqdi/opda). The set of UV–Vis electronic spectra were obtained by electrolytical generation, in situ, of all the redox species accessible in the CV working conditions (i.e., the starting [Ru^II(edta)(bqdi)]²⁻, the fully oxidized [Ru^III(edta)(bqdi)]⁻, and the fully reduced [Ru^II(edta)(opda)]²⁻ species), which are stable and totally interconvertible. The electrochemistry and absorption spectroscopy of these complexes in water were found to be comparable with the tetraammine counterparts. A remarkable difference in redox behavior between the diimine- and the analogous dioxolene-complexes was also revealed by comparison of the system reported herein with the one derived from catechol, and rationalized in terms of the quite efficient π-accepting electronic nature of the bqdi ligand.     

Preparation and electrochemical behavior of dimeric complexes of Ru2(III12, III12) and Ru2(IV,IV) formed by oxidative dimerization of [RuIII(edta)OH2]−

Electrochemical or chemical oxidation of [Ru^III(edta)OH₂]^? proceeds in successive half- and one-electron steps to yield dimeric complexes of Ru(III$\text{1}\text{2}$) and Ru(IV) believed to contain oxo- or dihydroxo-bridging ligands. Spectral and electrochemical properties of the complexes prepared by oxidative dimerization are described and compared with previous reports of dioxygen and peroxo complexes of Ru^III(edta). The dimeric Ru^IV(edta) complex is shown to exhibit modest activity as a catalyst for the oxidation of water to dioxygen.     

A Diruthenium Complex of an N-Pyridyl-o-aminophenol Derivative: A Route to Mixed Valency

An N-pyridyl-o-aminophenol derivative that stabilises mixed-valence states of ruthenium ions is disclosed. A diruthenium complex, [(L_IQ⁰)Ru₂Cl₅] ⋅ MeOH ( 1⋅ MeOH) is successfully isolated, in which L_IQ⁰ is the o-iminobenzoquinone form of 2-[(3-nitropyridin-2-yl)amino]phenol (L_APH₂). In 1 , L_IQ⁰ oriented towards one ruthenium centre is a non-innocent NO-donor redox ligand, whereas another oriented towards another ruthenium centre is an innocent pyridine-donor redox ligand. Complex 1 is a diruthenium(II,III) mixed-valence complex, [Ru^II(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III], with a minor contribution from the diruthenium(III,III) state. [Ru^III(L_ISQ^.−)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III] contains L_ISQ^.−, which is the o-iminobenzosemiquinonate anion radical form of the ligand. Complexes 1 ⁻ and 1 ⁺ are diruthenium(II,II), [Ru^II(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II], and diruthenium(III,III), [Ru^III(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III], complexes, respectively, of L_IQ⁰. Complex 1 ²⁻ is a diruthenium(II,II) complex of the o-iminobenzosemiquinonate anion radical (L_ISQ^.−), [Ru^II(L_ISQ^.−)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II], with a minor contribution from the diruthenium(III,II) form, [Ru^III(L_AP²⁻)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II]. Complex 1 ²⁺ is a diruthenium(III,IV) mixed-valence complex of L_IQ⁰, [Ru^III(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^IV]. Complexes 1 and 1 ²⁺ exhibit inter-valence charge-transfer transitions at λ=1300 and 1370 nm, respectively.     

RuIII(OTf)SalophenCH2–NHSiO2–Fe: an efficient and magnetically recoverable catalyst for trimethylsilylation of alcohols and phenols with hexamethyldisilazane

Efficient trimethylsilylation of alcohols and phenols with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) catalyzed by ruthenium(III) complex of chloromethylated Salophen supported on nanomagnetic materials is reported. First, the iron nanomagnets were silica coated, functionalized with amine and then ruthenium CM‐Salophen was successfully bonded to their surface. The catalyst, Ru^III(OTf)SalophenCH₂–NHSiO₂–Fe, was characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR and UV–visible spectroscopic techniques, transmission electron microscopy and inductively coupled plasma (ICP). The Ru^III(OTf)SalophenCH₂–NHSiO₂–Fe catalyzed trimethylsilylation of primary and secondary alcohols as well as phenols, and the corresponding TMS ethers were obtained in high yields and short reaction times at room temperature. This new heterogenized trimethylsilylation catalyst is easily recovered with a magnet and showed no appreciable loss of activity even after five consecutive runs. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis and spectral studies on heterobimetallic complexes of manganese and ruthenium derived from N-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylenebenzoylhydrazide

The complex [Mn^IV(napbh)₂] (napbhH₂ = N-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylenebenzoylhydrazide) reacts with activated ruthenium(III) chloride in methanol in 1 : 1.2 molar ratio under reflux, giving heterobimetallic complexes, [Mn^IV(napbh)₂Ru^IIICl₃(H₂O)] · [Ru^III(napbhH)Cl₂(H₂O)] reacts with Mn(OAc)₂·4H₂O in methanol in 1 : 1.2 molar ratio under reflux to give [Ru^III(napbhH)Cl₂(H₂O)Mn^II(OAc)₂]. Replacement of aquo in these heterobimetallic complexes has been observed when the reactions are carried out in the presence of pyridine (py), 3-picoline (3-pic), or 4-picoline (4-pic). The molar conductances for these complexes in DMF indicates 1 : 1 electrolytes. Magnetic moment values suggest that these heterobimetallic complexes contain Mn^IV and Ru^III or Ru^III and Mn^II in the same structural unit. Electronic spectral studies suggest six coordinate metal ions. IR spectra reveal that the napbhH₂ ligand coordinates in its enol form to Mn^IV and bridges to Ru^III and in the keto form to Ru^III and bridging to Mn^II.     

Evaluation of the Oxo‐bridged Dinuclear Ruthenium Ammine Complex as Redox Mediator in an Electrochemical Biosensor

The mediation of electron‐transfer by oxo‐bridged dinuclear ruthenium ammine [(bpy)₂(NH₃)Ru^III(µ‐O)Ru^III(NH₃)(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ for the oxidation of glucose was investigated by cyclic voltammetry. These ruthenium (III) complexes exhibit appropriate redox potentials of 0.131–0.09 V vs. SCE to act as electron‐transfer mediators. The plot of anodic current vs. the glucose concentration was linear in the concentration range between 2.52×10^?5 and 1.00×10^?4 mol L^?1. Moreover, the apparent Michaelis‐Menten kinetic (K_M^app) and the catalytic (K_cat) constants were 8.757×10^?6 mol L^?1 and 1,956 s^?1, respectively, demonstrating the efficiency of the ruthenium dinuclear oxo‐complex [(bpy)₂(NH₃)Ru^III(µ‐O)Ru^III(NH₃)(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ as mediator of redox electron‐transfer.     

Binuclear ruthenium complexes containing mPTA and alkyl-bis(8-thiotheophylline) derivatives (mPTA = N-methyl-1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane)

The water-soluble complex [RuClCp(PPh₃)(mPTA)](CF₃SO₃) reacts with the thiopurines, bis(S-8-thiotheophylline)methane (MBTTH₂), 1,2-bis(S-8-thiotheophylline)ethane (EBTTH₂), and 1,3-bis(S-8-thiotheophylline)propane (PBTTH₂), to lead to the binuclear ruthenium(II) complexes [{RuCp(PPh₃)(mPTA)}₂-μ-(L-κS7,S′7)](CF₃SO₃)₂ where (L = MBTT^2? (1), EBTT^2? (2), and PBTT^2? (3)). All the complexes have been fully characterized by elemental analysis, IR, and multinuclear ¹H, ¹³C{¹H}, and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy. The cyclic voltammetry of the complexes is characterized by two one-electron oxidative responses (Ru^II–Ru^II/Ru^III–Ru^II; Ru^III–Ru^II/Ru^III–Ru^III) that increase their redox potential when the bis(8-thiotheophylline)-alkyl-bridge growths. The reactivity against DNA and partition coefficient of the complexes were also determined.     

Ruthenium(II/III)‐Based Compounds with Encouraging Antiproliferative Activity against Non‐small‐Cell Lung Cancer

Hereby we present the synthesis of several ruthenium(II) and ruthenium(III) dithiocarbamato complexes. Proceeding from the Na[trans‐Ru^III(dmso)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ) and cis‐[Ru^II(dmso)₄Cl₂] ( 3 ) precursors, the diamagnetic, mixed‐ligand [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes 4 and 5 , the paramagnetic, neutral [Ru^IIIL₃] monomers 6 and 7 , the antiferromagnetically coupled ionic α‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl complexes 8 and 9 as well as the β‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl dinuclear species 10 and 11 (L=dimethyl‐ (DMDT) and pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDT)) were obtained. All the compounds were fully characterised by elemental analysis as well as ¹H NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, for the first time the crystal structures of the dinuclear β‐[Ru^III₂(dmdt)₅]BF₄ ? CHCl₃ ? CH₃CN and of the novel [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes were also determined and discussed. For both the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^II and Ru^III complexes the central metal atoms assume a distorted octahedral geometry. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes has been evaluated on non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) NCI‐H1975 cells. All the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^III dithiocarbamato compounds (i.e., complexes 6 – 10 ) show interesting cytotoxic activity, up to one order of magnitude higher with respect to cisplatin. Otherwise, no significant antiproliferative effect for either the precursors 2 and 3 or the Ru^II complexes 4 and 5 has been observed.     

Kinetics of oxidation of glutathione by an octahedral cobalt(III) complex with phenolate–amide–amine coordination

The reduction of the octahedral cobalt(III) complex Co^III(HL)·9H₂O, H₄L = 1,8-bis(2-hydroxybenzamido)-3,6-diazaoctane by glutathione (GSH) has been studied by conventional spectrophotometry at 25.0 ≤ t/°C ≤ 45.0, 0.02 ≤ [H⁺]/mol dm^?3 ≤ 0.20 and I = 0.3 mol dm^?3 (NaClO₄). The reaction is biphasic. The fast initial phase is attributed to the H⁺-induced formation of the mixed ligand complex, [Co^III(H₂L)GSH]⁺, for which the rate-limiting step is the chelate ring opening via Co^III–NH (amide–N) bond cleavage of the protonated species, [Co^III(H₂L)]⁺. Outer-sphere association equilibria between GSH/GSH₂ ⁺ and [Co^III(H₂L)]⁺ substantially retard the ring opening process and consequently the mixed ligand complex formation. This is then followed by a slow phase involving reduction of [Co^III(H₂L)GSH]⁺ by both GSH and GSH₂ ⁺. The final products are the corresponding Co(II) complex and the oxidized form of GSH, GS–SG. The kinetic data and activation parameters for the redox process are interpreted in terms of an outer-sphere electron transfer mechanism.     

Model oxygen-evolving center composed of polymer membrane and dimer ruthenium complex

The in situ spectrocyclic voltammetric investigations of the dimeric ruthenium complex used for water oxidation, [(bpy)₂(H₂O)Ru–O–Ru(H₂O)(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ (H₂O–Ru^III–Ru^III–OH₂), were carried out in a homogeneous aqueous solution and in a Nafion membrane under different pH conditions. The in situ absorption spectra recorded for the dimer show that the dimer H₂O–Ru^III–Ru^III–OH₂ complex underwent reactions initially to give the detectable H₂O–Ru^III–Ru^IV–OH and H₂O–Ru^III–Ru^IV–OH₂ complexes, and at higher positive potentials, this oxidized dimer underwent further oxidation to produce a presumably higher oxidation state Ru^V–Ru^V complex. Since this Ru^V–Ru^V complex is reduced rapidly by water molecules to H₂O–Ru^III–Ru^IV–OH₂, it could not be detected by absorption spectrum. Independent of the pH conditions and homogeneous solution/Nafion membrane systems, the dimer Ru^III–Ru^IV was detected at higher potentials, suggesting that the dimer complex acts as a three-electron oxidation catalyst. However, in the Nafion membrane system it was suggested that the dimer complex may act as a four-electron oxidation catalyst. While the dimer complex was stable under oxidation conditions, the reduction of the dimer Ru^III–Ru^III to Ru^II–Ru^II led to decomposition, yielding the monomeric cis-[Ru(bpy)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺.     

Stabilization of High‐Valence Ruthenium with Silicotungstate Ligands: Preparation,Structural Characterization,and Redox Studies of Ruthenium(III)‐Substituted α‐Keggin‐Type Silicotungstates with Pyridine Ligands, [SiW11O39RuIII(Py)]5−

Ruthenium(III)‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type silicotungstates with pyridine‐based ligands, [SiW₁₁O₃₉Ru^III(Py)]^5?, (Py: pyridine ( 1 ), 4‐pyridine‐carboxylic acid ( 2 ), 4,4′‐bipyridine ( 3 ), 4‐pyridine‐acetamide ( 4 ), and 4‐pyridine‐methanol ( 5 )) were prepared by reacting [SiW₁₁O₃₉Ru^III(H₂O)]^5? with the pyridine derivatives in water at 80 °C and then isolated as their hydrated cesium salts. These compounds were characterized using cyclic voltammetry (CV), UV/Vis, IR, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, titration, and X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES) analysis (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge). Single‐crystal X‐ray analysis of compounds 2 , 3 , and 4 revealed that Ru^III was incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and was coordinated by pyridine derivatives through a Ru? N bond. In the solid state, compounds 2 and 3 formed a dimer through π? π interaction of the pyridine moieties, whereas they existed as monomers in solution. CV indicated that the incorporated Ru^III–Py was reversibly oxidized into the Ru^IV–Py derivative and reduced into the Ru^II–Py derivative.     

Ruthenium(III) complexes with modified nucleobases: N-Substituted adenines

New chlorido-dimethylsulfoxide-ruthenium(III) complexes with different N⁶-substituted adenines have been prepared and characterized. Three ruthenium complexes have been structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction crystallography: [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(N⁶-pentyladenine)]] (1), [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(N⁶-hexyladenine)]] (2) and [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(N⁶,N⁶-dibutyladenine)]] (3). In all cases ruthenium ion show octahedral geometry coordinated to four chlorido ligands and one S coordinated sulfoxide (DMSO). The coordination sphere is completed by an adenine moiety coordinated to Ru(III) via N(9) and protonated at N(3). Other similar complexes have been obtained with N⁶-propyladenine, [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(N⁶-propyladenine)]] · 0.5EtOH (4) and N⁶-benzylaminopurine (BAP) [Ru^IIICl₄(DMSO)[H-(BAP)]] · 0.5H₂O (5) which have been spectroscopically characterized. Otherwise, in different reaction conditions, we have obtained an out sphere complex of Ru(II), [H-(BAP)][Ru^IICl₃(DMSO)₃] (6), with identical complex unit than the structurally solved [H-(creat)][Ru^IICl₃(DMSO)₃] (7) which was included for comparison purposes. Preliminary electrophoretic mobility and atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies of the interaction between Ru(III) compounds and plasmidic DNA pBR322 have been performed. These results show different morphological changes in plasmidic DNA forms.     

Preparation and StructuralCharacterization of RuII‐DMSO and RuIII‐DMSO‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type Phosphotungstates, [PW11O39RuIIDMSO]5– and [PW11O39RuIIIDMSO]4–, and Catalytic Activity for Water Oxidation

Ru^II‐ and Ru^III‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type phosphotungstates with a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) ligand, [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIDMSO]^5– ( 1 ) and [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIIDMSO]^4– ( 2 ), were synthesized. Compound 1 was prepared by reaction of [PW₁₁O₃₉]^7– with [Ru^II(DMSO)₄]Cl₂ in water at 125 °C under hydrothermal conditions and was isolated as a cesium salt. Compound 2 was prepared by reaction of 1 with bromine in water at 60 °C and was isolated as a cesium salt. The compounds were characterized by cyclic voltammetry, elemental analysis, UV/Vis, IR,³¹P NMR, ¹⁸³W NMR, ¹H NMR, and XANES (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge)spectroscopic methods. Single crystal structural analysis of 1 revealed that Ru^II is incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and coordinated by DMSO through a Ru–S bond. Cyclic voltammetry of 1 indicated that the incorporated Ru^II‐DMSO is reversibly oxidizable to the Ru^III‐DMSO derivative 2 . Compound 1 showed catalytic activity for water oxidation in the presence of cerium ammonium nitrate as an oxidant.