Interaction between polymer and anionic/nonionic surfactants and its mechanism of enhanced oil recovery

Various experimental methods were used to investigate interaction between polymer and anionic/nonionic surfactants and mechanisms of enhanced oil recovery by anionic/nonionic surfactants in the present paper. The complex surfactant molecules are adsorbed in the mixed micelles or aggregates formed by the hydrophobic association of hydrophobic groups of polymers, making the surfactant molecules at oil-water interface reduce and the value of interfacial tension between oil and water increase. A dense spatial network structure is formed by the interaction between the mixed aggregates and hydrophobic groups of the polymer molecular chains, making the hydrodynamic volume of the aggregates and the viscosity of the polymer solution increase. Because of the formation of the mixed adsorption layer at oil and water interface by synergistic effect, ultra-low interfacial tension (～2.0?×?10^?3 mN/m) can be achieved between the novel surfactant system and the oil samples in this paper. Because of hydrophobic interaction, wettability alteration of oil-wet surface was induced by the adsorption of the surfactant system on the solid surface. Moreover, the studied surfactant system had a certain degree of spontaneous emulsification ability (D50?=?25.04?µm) and was well emulsified with crude oil after the mechanical oscillation (D50?=?4.27?µm).     

Interaction of surfactant with antistatic polymer thin layers

Thin layers made from three kinds of hydrophilic polymer were coated onto poly(ethylene terephthalate)(PET) fibers to study the interaction of an anionic surfactant, sodiumn-dodecyl benzenesulfonate, with the polymer layers. The coated layers include a) poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) crosslinked with glutaraldehyde [nonionic], b) crosslinked, sulfated PVA [anionic], and c) polyethyleneimine crosslinked with poly(ethyleneglycol diglycidylether) [cationic]. All of these coatings were found to reduce the electrostatic charging of the PET cloths, indicating that they were effectively coated with the hydrophilic polymers. The PET cloth coated with the thin layers was immersed in the aqueous solution of surfactant at 40°C for different durations and the electrostatic voltage as well as the weight change were determined after drying. When the cloth coated with the nonionic or the anionic layer was brought into contact with the surfactant, neither the electrostatic voltage nor the weight of PET changed. On the contrary, immersion in the surfactant solution brought about an increase in both the electrostatic voltage and the weight for the PET coated with the cationic layer. This suggested that the surfactant molecules were bound to the cationic layer, in contrast to the nonionic and the anionic layer. It was concluded that the binding was due to ion complexing between the cationic groups in the polymeric layer and the sulfate groups in the surfactant molecules.     

Ethoxylated nonionic surfactants in hydrophobic solvent: interaction with aqueous and membrane-immobilized poly(acrylic acid)

Interaction between ethoxylated nonionic surfactants and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) in aqueous solutions is well-documented in the literature. In the present study, pure ethoxylated surfactant solution in a hydrophobic solvent was permeated through a partially cross-linked PAA composite membrane to quantify the surfactant-PAA interaction in the heterogeneous system. Partitioning of the mixture of the surfactants (15-S-5) between the hydrophobic solvent and aqueous solution of PAA was also studied. The role of ethylene oxide group variation in the surfactant-PAA interaction for the heterogeneous system was established by performing experiments with pure surfactants having the same alkyl chain length but varying ethoxylate chain lengths. It was observed that the surfactants with a higher number of ethylene oxide groups per molecule exhibit stronger interaction with PAA. The literature data for adsorption of pure ethoxylated surfactants (C12E(n)) on a hydrophobic solid-water interface was correlated and compared with the data obtained in our study. It was calculated that resistance in terms of transfer of surfactant molecules from a hydrophobic solvent domain to PAA domain lowers the extent of PAA-surfactant interaction by an order of magnitude. Only 40% of available carboxyl groups were accessible for interaction with the ethoxylated nonionic surfactants due to diffusion limitations. Finally the pH sensitivity of the PAA-surfactant complex was verified by successful regeneration of the membrane on permeation of slightly alkaline water. The regeneration and reuse of membrane is especially attractive in terms of process development for nonionic surfactant separation from hydrophobic solvents.     

Organization of amphiphiles: XII. Evidence in favor of formation of hydrophobic complexes in aqueous solution

The effects of nonionic surfactants OP-10 and OP-30 (polyoxyethylated octyl phenols with 10 and 30 oxyethylene groups, respectively) in surfactant mixtures with ionic surfactants hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) have been investigated by a conductometric method in conjunction with fluorescence, surface tension, zeta potential, and DLS measurements. The interactions are found to be antagonistic in nature for each of the systems; i.e., micellization of CTAB as well as SDS is hindered on addition of the nonionic surfactants. The antagonism is found to be more prominent in the presence of OP-10 compared to that of OP-30. Two types of mechanistic paths, path A operating below the critical micellar concentration and path B operating beyond the critical micellar concentration of nonionic surfactants, have been suggested. In path A, the retardation in micellization has been attributed to a decrease in monomeric concentration of the ionic surfactants from solution as a result of the formation of a hydrophobic complex between nonionic and ionic surfactants. In path B, the decrease in monomer concentration is due to the solubilization of the ionic surfactant in micelles of the nonionic surfactants in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio. A theoretical treatment to the interaction in each ionic-nonionic pair yields a positive value of the interaction parameter supporting the concept of antagonism. The formation of the hydrophobic complex is supported by fluorescence and surface tension measurements. A schematic representation of the stabilization of these hydrophobic complexes has been suggested. The association of ionic surfactants by nonionic micelles is suggested by zeta potential and DLS studies.     

Effect of Surfactants on the Formation,Morphology, and Surface Property of Synthesized SiO2 Nanoparticles

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of cationic, anionic (saturated and unsaturated), and nonionic surfactants on the formation, morphology, and surface properties of silica nanoparticles synthesized by the ammonium‐catalyzed hydrolysis of tetraethoxysilane in alcoholic media. Results indicate that at a relatively low surfactant concentration (1 × 10^?3–1 × 10^?6 M), cationic surfactants significantly affected the growth of silica particles as measured by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopic analyses. In contrast, the anionic and nonionic surfactants showed relatively minor effects in the low concentration range. The magnitude of negative zeta potential was reduced for silica colloids that were synthesized in the presence of cationic surfactant because of charge neutralization. The presence of anionic surfactants only slightly increased the negative zeta potential while the nonionic surfactant showed no obvious effects. At high surfactant concentrations (>1 × 10^?3 M), cationic and anionic surfactants both induced colloid aggregation, while the nonionic surfactant showed no effect on particle size. Raman spectroscopic analysis suggests that molecules of cationic surfactants adsorb on silica surfaces via head groups, aided by favorable electrostatic attraction, while molecules of anionic and nonionic surfactants adsorb via their hydrophobic tails.     

PROPERTIES OF DILUTE SOLUTIONS OF HYDROPHOBICALLY MODIFIED POLY (4-VINYL PYRIDINE) (POLYSOAPS)

Hydrophobically modified poly(4-vinyl pyridines) by alkyl bromides arekinds of polysoap similar to the surfactant. Properties of dilute solutions were studiedthrough the viscosity measurements in pure water and NaCl solutions. In aqueous solu-tions of polysoaps hydrophobic interaction can be attributed to aggregation of hydrophobicgroups of the polysoap main chains. The hydrophobic groups of polysoap can aggregate toform hydrophobic microdomains (micelles) in aqueous solution. This is a compact confor-mation. The formation of such microdomains is a process of dynamic equilibrium.     

Microcalorimetric study on micellization of nonionic surfactants with a benzene ring or adamantane in their hydrophobic chains

The micellization of a novel family of nonionic surfactants poly(oxyethylene) glycol alkyl ethers has been studied by microcalorimetry. One of the surfactants has adamantane, and the other nonionic surfactants have a benzene ring in their hydrophobic chains, which moves from the terminal of the hydrophobic chain toward the headgroup. Moreover, the alkyl chain of the nonionic surfactants is straight or branched. Both the critical micelle concentration (cmc) and the thermodynamic parameters associated with the micelle formation have been obtained. The cmc decreases and the enthalpy of micelle formation (deltaH(mic)) becomes less positive gradually as the length of hydrophobic chain increases, whereas the values of cmc and deltaH(mic) tend to increase for the surfactants with a longer ethylene oxide chain. However, the deltaH(mic) value of the surfactant with seven carbon atoms in a hydrophobic chain is more positive than that of the surfactant with six carbon atoms in a hydrophobic chain. Comparing with the nonionic surfactant with a methylene hydrophobic chain, the surfactants with benzene rings and adamantane groups have larger cmc values and the cmc values increase with the size of the groups. Furthermore, moving the phenyl group from the terminal of the hydrophobic chain to the neighbor of the hydrophilic headgroup leads to the decreased cmc. Both the variation of hydrophobic interaction from the movement of phenyl group and pi-pi interaction among adjacent phenyl groups affect deltaH(mic) values.     

Foaming and foam stability for mixed polymer-surfactant solutions: effects of surfactant type and polymer charge

Solutions of surfactant-polymer mixtures often exhibit different foaming properties, compared to the solutions of the individual components, due to the strong tendency for formation of polymer-surfactant complexes in the bulk and on the surface of the mixed solutions. A generally shared view in the literature is that electrostatic interactions govern the formation of these complexes, for example between anionic surfactants and cationic polymers. In this study we combine foam tests with model experiments to evaluate and explain the effect of several polymer-surfactant mixtures on the foaminess and foam stability of the respective solutions. Anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants (SDS, C(12)TAB, and C(12)EO(23)) were studied to clarify the role of surfactant charge. Highly hydrophilic cationic and nonionic polymers (polyvinylamine and polyvinylformamide, respectivey) were chosen to eliminate the (more trivial) effect of direct hydrophobic interactions between the surfactant tails and the hydrophobic regions on the polymer chains. Our experiments showed clearly that the presence of opposite charges is not a necessary condition for boosting the foaminess and foam stability in the surfactant-polymer mixtures studied. Clear foam boosting (synergistic) effects were observed in the mixtures of cationic surfactant and cationic polymer, cationic surfactant and nonionic polymer, and anionic surfactant and nonionic polymer. The mixtures of anionic surfactant and cationic polymer showed improved foam stability, however, the foaminess was strongly reduced, as compared to the surfactant solutions without polymer. No significant synergistic or antagonistic effects were observed for the mixture of nonionic surfactant (with low critical micelle concentration) and nonionic polymer. The results from the model experiments allowed us to explain the observed trends by the different adsorption dynamics and complex formation pattern in the systems studied.     

Association of surfactants and polymers studied by luminescence techniques

Light emission spectroscopy has unique possibilities for the study of central issues of surfactants and associating polymers. With the help of luminescent probes, information may be obtained on matters such as molecular association, microstructure, and molecular dynamics; this constitutes an important contribution to the understanding and control of macroscopic properties, as well as biological function and technical applications. Important aspects of these systems considered in this review are: formation of micelles and hydrophobic microdomains; aggregation numbers of surfactants; shape of molecular aggregates; size of droplets in water or in oil in microemulsions; formation and stability of vesicles; intra- vs. intermolecular association in polymers; conformational changes in polymers; polymer–surfactant association; surfactant organization in adsorbed layers; kinetic aspects regarding the formation and disintegration of self-assembly structures; residence times of molecules in microdomains and migration of active molecules.     

Quantitative Structure—Property Relationship on Prediction of Surface Tension of Nonionic Surfactants

When a surfactant is solved into a solvent, it will adsorb onto the surface of the solution and reduce the surface free energy to a marked degree. The surface free energy, which is the minimum amount of work required to create that surface, is usually measured by surface tension. The minimum of surface tension 0g is the most useful key for characterizing the activity of surfactant. It is well known that 0g is determined by the molecular structure of surfactant, i.e., the contributions from …     

Mixed micelles of polyethylene glycol (23) lauryl ether with ionic surfactants studied by proton 1D and 2D NMR

(1)H NMR chemical shift, spin-lattice relaxation time, spin-spin relaxation time, self-diffusion coefficient, and two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser enhancement (2D NOESY) measurements have been used to study the nonionic-ionic surfactant mixed micelles. Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were used as the ionic surfactants and polyethylene glycol (23) lauryl ether (Brij-35) as the nonionic surfactant. The two systems are both with varying molar ratios of CTAB/Brij-35 (C/B) and SDS/Brij-35 (S/B) ranging from 0.5 to 2, respectively, at a constant concentration of 6 mM for Brij-35 in aqueous solutions. Results give information about the relative arrangement of the surfactant molecules in the mixed micelles. In the former system, the trimethyl groups attached to the polar heads of the CTAB molecules are located between the first oxy-ethylene groups next to the hydrophobic chains of Brij-35 molecules. These oxy-ethylene groups gradually move outward from the hydrophobic core of the mixed micelle with an increase in C/B in the mixed solution. In contrast to the case of the CTAB/Triton X-100 system, the long flexible hydrophilic poly oxy-ethylene chains, which are in the exterior part of the mixed micelles, remain coiled, but looser, surrounding the hydrophobic core. There is almost no variation in conformation of the hydrophilic chains of Brij-35 molecules in the mixed micelles of the SDS/Brij-35 system as the S/B increases. The hydrophobic chains of both CTAB and SDS are co-aggregated with Brij-35, respectively, in their mixed micellar cores.     

Study of mixtures of n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside with anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactant in aqueous solutions using surface tension and fluorescence techniques

Surfactants of practical interest are invariably mixtures of different types. In this study, mixtures of sugar-based n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside with cationic dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide, anionic sodium dodecylsulfate, and nonionic pentaethyleneglycol monododecyl ether in solution, with and without supporting electrolyte, have been studied using surface tension and fluorescence spectroscopic techniques. Interaction parameters and mole fraction of components in mixed micelles were calculated using regular solution theory. The magnitude of interactions between n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside and other surfactants followed the order anionic/nonionic > cationic/nonionic > nonionic/nonionic mixtures. Since all surfactants have the same hydrophobic groups, strengths of interactions are attributed to the structures of hydrophilic headgroups. Electrolyte reduced synergism between n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside and ionic surfactant due to charge neutralization. Industrial sugar-based surfactant, dodecyl polyglucoside, yielded results similar to that with dodecyl maltoside, implying that tested commercial alkyl polyglucosides are similar to the pure laboratory samples in synergistic interactions with other surfactants. Fluorescence study not only supported the cmc results using tensiometry, but showed that interfaces of all the above mixed micelle/solution interfaces are mildly hydrophobic. Based on these results, an attempt is made to discover the nature of interactions to be a combination of intermolecular potential energies and free energy due to packing of surfactant molecules in micelles.     

Micellar extraction preconcentration of barium with phases of nonionic surfactants at the cloud point

The micellar extraction of barium with phases of nonionic surfactant Triton X-100 was studied in the presence of aliphatic monocarboxylic acids, crown ethers, and Carboxyarsenazo and its mixtures with cetylpyridinium chloride and octylamine. It was shown that the complete extraction of barium into the micellar phase was attained using Carboxyarsenazo and cationic surfactants in the presence of octylamine through the formation of a ternary hydrophobic complex. The conditions for the determination of the atomic absorption of barium in water with preconcentration into the nonionic surfactant phase at the cloud point temperature were developed.     

Interaction of bovine serum albumin with nonionic surfactant Tween 80 in aqueous solutions: Complexation and association

It is shown by the methods of precision tensiometry, quasi-elastic light scattering, and UV, IR, and fluorescent spectroscopies that the properties of binary aqueous solutions with a constant concentration of bovine serum albumin and different concentrations of the nonionic surfactant Tween 80 (1 × 10^–7−6 × 10⁻² M) are determined mainly by the complexation and formation of a new phase. The complexation occurs owing to specific interactions (hydrogen bonding) between polar groups of Tween 80 and protein molecules. The solubility in water and surface activity of a 1: 1 Tween 80-protein complex are determined. At the concentrations above the break point on surface tension isotherms (conditionally corresponding to critical association concentration), the particles are formed with radii varying from 16 to 350 nm. At a molar nonionic surfactant/protein ratio in the range of 6–10, the additional binding of Tween 80 molecules by the particles of the new phase due to hydrophobic interactions is observed. Original Russian Text ? N.M. Zadymova, G.P. Yampol’skaya, L.Yu. Filatova, 2006, published in Kolloidnyi Zhurnal, 2006, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 187–197.     

Charge-Transfer Chromatographic Study on the Interaction of Nonhomologous Series of Nonionic Surfactants with Heptakis(2,6-di-O-methyl)-β-cyclodextrin

Abstract

The interaction of 38 nonionic surfactants containing various hydrophobic moieties with dimethyl-β-cyclodextrin (DIMEB) was studied by charge transfer chromatography. DIMED modified the retention behaviour of each surfactant, however, the strength of interaction varied considerably. Both the lipophilicity and specific hydrophobic surface area of surfactants significantly influenced the strength of interaction. The presence of ester bond and double bond in the hydrophobic moiety of surfactants has impact on the complex formation.     

Aggregation and pH responsive disassembly of a new acid-labile surfactant synthesized by thiol-acrylate Michael addition reaction

Nucleophilic thiol-acrylate Michael reaction between a hydrophobic thiol and hydrophilic acrylate derivative generated a nonionic surfactant with acid-labile β-thiopropionate linker. Micellization of the surfactant, its ability to encapsulate hydrophobic dye, acid-induced disruption of the aggregate and pH-selective dye release profile have been revealed in this report. The micellar aggregates were found to be stable under neutral conditions, but they could be disrupted in acidic pH (5.3), and thus the encapsulated hydrophobic dye molecules could be selectively released. Appropriate control experiments revealed that the sulfur atom in the β-position is essential for acidic hydrolysis of the ester functionality of the surfactant.     

The Association of Picrate Ions with Amphiphilic Cations in Water and Aqueous Solutions of Nonionic Surfactant and β-Cyclodextrin

The interaction of cetyltrimethylammonium and cetylpyridinium bromides with picrate ions in water and aqueous solutions of the nonionic surfactant Brij 35 is studied by spectrophotometry. Spectral characteristics of the associates of picrate ions with long-chain nitrogen-containing cations depend on the concentration of a cationic surfactant. When β-cyclodextrin is added, these associates decompose owing to the formation of the strong inclusion complexes of the guest-host type with amphiphilic ions of a cationic surfactant or Brij 35 molecules. The conclusion is made that the driving force for the formation of premicellar aggregates involving picrate ions is the interactions between alkyl chains of surfactant cations. It is shown that, in the presence of various surfactants, as β-cyclodextrin concentration increases, first the molecules of nonionic surfactant and then amphiphilic cations bind with the receptor cavity. It is confirmed that there is no interaction between polyethylene glycol and β-cyclodextrin in aqueous solution.     

Microstructure of un-neutralized hydrophobically modified alkali-soluble emulsion latex in different surfactant solutions

At low pH conditions and in the presence of anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants, hydrophobically modified alkali-soluble emulsions (HASE) exhibit pronounced interaction that results in the solubilization of the latex. The interaction between HASE latex and surfactant was studied using various techniques, such as light transmittance, isothermal titration calorimetry, laser light scattering, and electrophoresis. For anionic surfactant, noncooperative hydrophobic binding dominates the interaction at concentrations lower than the critical aggregation concentration (CAC) (C < CAC). However, cooperative hydrophobic binding controls the formation of mixed micelles at high surfactant concentrations (C > or = CAC), where the cloudy solution becomes clear. For cross-linked HASE latex, anionic surfactant binds only noncooperatively to the latex and causes it to swell. For cationic surfactant, electrostatic interaction occurs at very low surfactant concentrations, resulting in phase separation. With further increase in surfactant concentration, noncooperative hydrophobic and cooperative hydrophobic interactions dominate the binding at low and high surfactant concentrations, respectively. For anionic and cationic surfactant systems, the CAC is lower than the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of surfactants in water. In addition, counterion condensation plays an important role during the binding interaction between HASE latex and ionic surfactants. In the case of nonionic surfactants, free surfactant micelles are formed in solution due to their relatively low CMC values, and HASE latexes are directly solubilized into the micellar core of nonionic surfactants.     

苄泽类非离子型表面活性剂与明胶的相互作用

采用表面张力和稳态荧光光谱法考察了具有不同疏水结构的2种苄泽类非离子型表面活性剂Brij58和Brij78与明胶之间的相互作用。结果表明,苄泽类非离子型表面活性剂与明胶之间相互作用的驱动力为疏水作用力,且两者之间的相互作用受到其疏水基团的影响,Brij78在明胶溶液中的临界聚集浓度低于Brij58体系,表明疏水链更长的Brij78与明胶之间的相互作用更强。明胶分子的内源荧光光谱强度受苄泽类非离子型表面活性剂的影响,但最大吸收峰位置未发生蓝移,Brij78/明胶体系的内源荧光强度高于Brij58/明胶体系;此外,表面活性剂浓度较低时,明胶的加入使溶液中疏水微区极性明显降低,且明胶浓度越大降低程度越大。     

Interfacial Dilational Properties of Hydrophobically Modified Partly Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide and Anionic Surfactants at the Water-Decane Interface

The dilational viscoelastic properties of hydrophobically modified partly hydrolyzed polyacrylamide and anionic surfactants (4,5-diheptyl-2-propylbenzene sulfonate and gemini surfactant C₁₂COONa-p-C₉SO₃Na) in the absence or presence of electrolyte have been investigated at the decane–water interface by means of longitudinal method and the interfacial tension relaxation method. Experimental results show that at low surfactant concentration, the increase of the dilational modulus by the addition of surfactant molecules at low frequency might be explained by the mix-adsorption of the polymer chains and surfactant molecules. At the same time, polymer chain could sharply decrease the dilational modulus of surfactant film mainly due to the weakening of the strong interactions among long alkyl chains in surfactant molecules. At high surfactant concentration, the addition of surfactant molecules can decrease the dilational modulus of polymer solution due to the fast process involving in the exchange of surfactant molecules between the interface and the mixed complex formed by surfactant molecules and hydrophobic micro-domains. The added electrolyte, which results in screening of electrostatic interactions between the ionized groups, generally increases the frequency dependence of the interfacial dilational modulus. The data obtained on the relaxation processes via interfacial tension relaxation measurements can explain the results from oscillating barriers measurements very well.