Bis(oxofluorenediyl)oxacyclophanes: synthesis, crystal structure and complexation with paraquat in the gas phase

The first three representatives of the new family of oxacyclophanes incorporating two 2,7-dioxyfluorenone fragments, connected by [-CH(2)CH(2)O-](m) spacers (m=2-4), have been synthesized. The yield of the smallest oxacyclophane (m=2) is considerably higher with respect to the larger ones (m=3 and m=4), which are formed in comparable yields. Molecular modeling and NMR spectra analysis of the model compounds suggest that an essential difference in oxacyclophanes yields is caused by formation of quasi-cyclic intermediates, which are preorganized for macrocyclization owing to intramolecular pi-pi stacking interactions between the fluorenone units. The solid-state structures of these oxacyclophanes exhibit intra- and intermolecular pi-pi stacking interactions that dictate their rectangular shape in the fluorenone backbone and crystal packing of the molecules with the parallel or T-shape arrangement. The crystal packing in all cases is also sustained by weak C--HO hydrogen bonds. FAB mass spectral analysis of mixtures of the larger oxacyclophanes (m=3 and m=4) and a paraquat moiety revealed peaks corresponding to the loss of one and two PF(6) (-) counterions from the 1:1 complexes formed. However, no signals were observed for complexes of the paraquat moiety with the smaller oxacyclophane (m=2). Computer molecular modeling of complexes revealed a pseudorotaxane-like incorporation of the paraquat unit, sandwiched within a macrocyclic cavity between the almost parallel-aligned fluorenone rings of the larger oxacyclophanes (m=3 and m=4). In contrast to this, only external complexes of the smallest oxacyclophane (m=2) with a paraquat unit have been found in the energy window of 10 kcal mol(-1).     

Rebek Imide Platforms as Model Systems for the Investigation of Weak Intermolecular Interactions

A Rebek imide receptor with an acetylene‐linked phenyl ring complexes 2,6‐di(isobutyramido)pyridine in (CDCl₂)₂ via triple H‐bonding and π–π‐stacking interactions, and the influence of para‐substituents on both rings was investigated by ¹H NMR binding titrations. When the phenyl ring was extended to biphenyl and the C(4)‐pyridine substituent varied, interaction energies increased in the order CH₃CH₂???phenyl<CH₃S???phenyl<phenyl???phenyl?N‐methylcarboxamide???phenyl, highlighting the energetic gain from π stacking on amide fragments. The predicted preference of amide–π stacking for an antiparallel alignment of the local dipoles could not be confirmed with the studied system. Different substituents were introduced in the para position of the phenyl ring and their interaction with bound 2,6‐di(isobutyramido)pyridine was investigated. Theoretical predictions that the mere introduction of a substituent has a stabilizing effect on π–π stacking, regardless of its electronic nature, were experimentally confirmed.     

Multinuclear Silver Ethynide Supramolecular Synthons for the Construction of Coordination Networks

The invariant appearance of the μ₈ coordination mode for the C₄^2? dianion in its silver(I) complexes, with four silver(I) atoms attached to each terminal ethynide moiety, implies that the Ag₄?C?C? C?C?Ag₄ species may be considered as a new type of supramolecular synthon for the construction of 1D, 2D, and 3D coordination polymers. This Focus Review covers recent results on the synthesis and structural characterization of silver(I) arylethynide and alkylethynide complexes, which established the existence and utility of analogous polynuclear supramolecular synthons R? C?C?Ag_n (R=aryl or alkyl; n=4, 5) and Ag_n?C₂? R? C₂?Ag_n (R=p‐, m‐, o‐C₆H₄; n=4, 5). The interplay of silver–ethynide bonding, which can be classified into σ, π, and mixed (σ,π) types, with argentophilicity, π–π stacking, and other weak interactions highlights the complexity and challenge in building coordination networks of silver ethynide complexes.     

Supramolecular interaction patterns in the zinc(II) dichloride and tin(IV) tetrachloride complexes with dipyrido[f,h]quinoxaline‐6,7‐dicarbonitrile

This study characterizes the supramolecular synthons that dominate the intermolecular organization of the title compounds, namely dichloridobis(dipyrido[f,h]quinoxaline‐6,7‐dicarbonitrile)zinc(II), [ZnCl₂(C₁₆H₆N₆)₂], (I), and tetrachlorido(dipyrido[f,h]quinoxaline‐6,7‐dicarbonitrile)tin(IV), [SnCl₄(C₁₆H₆N₆)], (II), in their respective crystal structures. Molecules of (I) are located on 2^b axes of rotational symmetry. Their crystal packing is stabilized mostly by π–π stacking and dipole–dipole attractions between the organic ligand fragments of inversion‐related neighbouring species, as well as by weak intermolecular C—H...N hydrogen bonds. On the other hand, Cl...π and N...π interactions seem to direct the crystal packing in (II), which is unusual in the sense that its aromatic fragments are not involved in π–π stacking. Molecules of (II) are located on m^b planes of mirror symmetry. This study confirms the diverse structural chemistry of this organic ligand, which can be involved in a wide range of supramolecular interactions. These include effective coordination to various metal ions via the phenathroline N‐atom sites, π–π stacking and π...halogen contacts through its extended π‐system, and hydrogen bonding and N...π interactions through its nitrile groups. The competing natures of the latter make it difficult to predict a priori the preferred supramolecular motif that may form in a given structure.     

Modulation of Crystal Packing via the Tuning of Peripheral Functionality for a Family of Dinuclear Mesocates

A family of four novel pyrazinyl‐hydrazone based ligands have been synthesized with differing functionality at the 5‐position of the central aromatic ring. Previous work has shown such ligands to form dinuclear triple mesocates which pack to form hexagonal channels capable of gas sorption. The effect of the peripheral functionality of the ligand on the crystal packing was investigated by synthesizing complexes 1 to 4 which feature amino, bromo, iodo and methoxy substituents respectively. Complexes 1 to 3 crystallized in the same hexagonal space group P6₃/m and featured 1D channels. However, on closer inspection while the packing of 1 is mediated by hydrogen bonding interactions, the packing of complexes 2 and 3 are not, due to a subtlety different π–π stacking interaction enforced by the halogen substituent. The more bulky nature of the methoxy substituent of 4 results in the complex crystallizing in the triclinic space group P‐1, featuring an entirely different crystal packing.     

Dichlorido{2‐[(2,6‐diethylphenyl)iminomethyl]quinoline‐κ2N,N′}palladium(II) acetonitrile monosolvate

The title complex, [PdCl₂(C₂₀H₂₀N₂)]·CH₃CN, was synthesized by the reaction of 2‐[(2,6‐diethylphenyl)iminomethyl]quinoline with dichlorido(cycloocta‐1,5‐diene)palladium(II) in dry CH₂Cl₂. The Pd^II ion is coordinated by two N atoms of the bidentate quinoline ligand and by two chloride anions, generating a distorted square‐planar coordination geometry around the metal centre. There is a detectable trans influence for the chloride ligands. The crystal packing is characterized by π–π stacking between the quinoline rings. The use of acetonitrile as the crystallization solvent was essential for obtaining good‐quality crystals.     

Intramolecular and Intermolecular Magnetic Coupling Mechanism of a Dinuclear Copper(II) Complex

Abstract. A new dinuclear complex, [Cu₂(μ_{1, 3}‐NCS)₂(Ophen)₂(OH₂)₂], (HOphen = 1, 10‐phenanthrolin‐2‐ol) was synthesized and its crystal structure was determined by X‐ray crystallography. In the complex, the Cu^II ion assumes a distorted square pyramidal arrangement and the thiocyanate anion functions as bridged ligand and Ophen as capped ligand. The analysis of the crystal structure shows that there exists a π–π stacking interaction between the adjacent complexes. The theoretical calculations reveal that the magnetic coupling pathways from the thiocyanate anions bridge ligand and the π–π stacking magnetic coupling pathway resulted in the weak ferromagnetic interactions with 2J = 18.46 cm^–1 and 2J = 10.46 cm^–1, respectively. The calculations also display that the spin delocalization and the spin polarization occur in the bridge magnetic coupling system and the π–π stacking magnetic coupling system, and the magnetic coupling mechanism of the π–π stacking can be explained with McConnell I spin‐polarization mechanism. The fitting for the data of the variable‐temperature magnetic susceptibility with dinuclear Cu^II formula gave the magnetic coupling constant 2J = 2.84 cm^–1 and zJ′ = 0.03 cm^–1, in which the 2J = 2.84 cm^–1 is attributed to the magnetic coupling from the bridge dinuclear Cu^II unit and the zJ′ = 0.03 cm^–1 is ascribed to the π–π stacking magnetic coupling system. The study may benefit to understand the magnetic coupling mechanism of π–π stacking system.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Supramolecular Chemistry of Three Azide Manganese Complexes with 2, 6‐Bis(benzimidazol‐2‐yl)pyridine

Three azide complexes with the tridentate ligand 2, 6‐bis(benzimidazol‐2‐yl)pyridine (H₂BBIP) were synthesized and their complicated supramolecular interactions were investigated with single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Interestingly, the complexes are assembled by bifurcated hydrogen bonding, double helical π–π stacking, or anion–π stacking interactions of the benzimidazole rings by tuning the reaction conditions (temperature, ratio, solvent). Complex 1 is a mononuclear compound, namely, Mn(H₂BBIP)N₃(CH₃O) · CH₃OH. In its 3D supramolecular network, the nitrogen atom of the azide anion is acting as hydrogen bonding bifurcated acceptor. Complex 2 is a dinuclear compound, namely, Mn₂(H₂BBIP)₂(N₃)₂ · (H₂O)_0.5. The dinuclear unit is connected by intramolecular π–π stacking interactions. Furthermore, double helical π–π stacking interactions in the benzimidazole rings are observed. Complex 3 , Mn₂(H₂BBIP)₂(N₃)₂ · CH₃OH, can be formulated as a pseudopolymorph of complex 2 , which exhibits intramolecular π–π stacking interactions as well as anion–π interactions in the dinuclear unit.     

Three Dicyanidometallate(I)‐based Complexes Incorporating Hydrogen‐bonding, π–π Packing and d10–d10 Interactions with Auxiliary 2,2′‐Bipyridyl‐like Ligands

To investigate the influence of the non‐covalent interactions, such as hydrogen‐bonding, π–π packing and d¹⁰–d¹⁰ interactions in the supramolecular motifs, three cyanido‐bridged heterobimetallic discrete complexes {Mn(bipy)₂(H₂O)[Ag(CN)₂]}[Ag(CN)₂] ( 1 ), {Mn(phen)₂(H₂O)[Au(CN)₂]}₂[Au(CN)₂]₂ · 4H₂O ( 2 ), and {Cd(bipy)₂(H₂O)[Au(CN)₂]}[Au(CN)₂] ( 3 ) (bipy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, and phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline), which are based on dicyanidometallate(I) groups with 1:2 stoichiometry of metal ions and 2,2′‐bipyridyl‐like co‐ligands were synthesized and structurally characterized. In compound 1 , hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions governed the supramolecular contacts. In compound 2 , the incorporation of aurophilic, hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions result in a 3D supramolecular network. In compound 3 , hydrogen bonding and π–π stacking interactions result in a 2D supramolecular layer. In the three complexes, hydrogen‐bonding, π–π packing and/or d¹⁰–d¹⁰ interactions can play important roles in increasing the dimensionality of supramolecular assemblies.     

Theoretical investigation of the nature and strength of simultaneous interactions of π–π stacking and halogen bond including NMR,SAPT, AIM and NBO analysis

Ab initio MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ calculations were performed to investigate mutual effect between π–π stacking and halogen bond interactions in X-ben||pyr···Cl–F complexes (X = CN, F, Cl, Br, CH₃, OH and H where || and ··· denote π–π stacking and halogen bonds). The results indicate the cooperativity of π–π stacking and halogen bonds in these complexes. This effect was discussed in terms of the energetic, geometrical parameters and charge-transfer properties of the complexes. To explore on the two-bonded spin–spin coupling constant ^2X J(N–F) across ¹⁵N···³⁵Cl–¹⁹F halogen bond in X-ben||pyr···Cl–F complexes, NMR calculations were performed at PBE0/aug-cc-pVDZ levels of theory. To get more insight into the physical nature of the binding energies, Symmetry Adapted Perturbation Theory calculations were carried out. Energy decomposition indicates that the percentage of the electrostatic term in the halogen bonding system constitutes approximately half of the total attractive binding energies, while the percentage of the dispersion term in the π–π stacking complexes constitutes approximately half of the attractive binding energies. In addition, atoms in molecules, natural bond orbital and molecular electrostatic potential were also used to probe the π–π stacking interactions and halogen bonding strengths.     

Conjugated Polyelectrolyte‐Induced Self‐Assembly of Alkynylplatinum(II) 2,6‐Bis(benzimidazol‐2′‐yl)pyridine Complexes

Water‐soluble cationic alkynylplatinum(II) 2,6‐bis(benzimidazol‐2′‐yl)pyridine (bzimpy) complexes have been demonstrated to undergo supramolecular assembly with anionic polyelectrolytes in aqueous buffer solution. Metal–metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MMLCT) absorptions and triplet MMLCT (³MMLCT) emissions have been found in UV/Vis absorption and emission spectra of the electrostatic assembly of the complexes with non‐conjugated polyelectrolytes, driven by Pt???Pt and π–π interactions among the complex molecules. Interestingly, the two‐component ensemble formed by [Pt(bzimpy‐Et){C?CC₆H₄(CH₂NMe₃‐4)}]Cl₂ ( 1 ) with para‐linked conjugated polyelectrolyte (CPE), PPE‐SO₃^?, shows significantly different photophysical properties from that of the ensemble formed by 1 with meta‐linked CPE, mPPE‐Ala. The helical conformation of mPPE‐Ala allows the formation of strong mPPE‐Ala– 1 aggregates with Pt???Pt, electrostatic, and π–π interactions, as revealed by the large Stern–Volmer constant at low concentrations of 1 . Together with the reasonably large Förster radius, large HOMO–LUMO gap and high triplet state energy of mPPE‐Ala to minimize both photo‐induced charge transfer (PCT) and Dexter triplet energy back‐transfer (TEBT) quenching of the emission of 1 , efficient Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) from mPPE‐Ala to aggregated 1 molecules and strong ³MMLCT emission have been found, while the less strong PPE‐SO₃^?– 1 aggregates and probably more efficient PCT and Dexter TEBT quenching would account for the lack of ³MMLCT emission in the PPE‐SO₃^?– 1 ensemble.     

Structures and Fluorescent Properties of Cadmium(II) Complexes with 1D and 2D Structures Based on Tridentate Benzimidazole Ligands

The cadmium(II) complexes [CdL1(m‐nba)₂] ( 1 ), [CdL1(p‐nba)₂] · C₂H₅OH ( 2 ), [CdL2(p‐nba)₂] · CH₃OH ( 3 ), and [CdL2(p‐nbat)₂] ( 4 ) containing the ligands L1 and L2 [L1 = 2,6‐bis(benzimidazol‐2‐yl)pyridine, L2 = bis(2‐benzimidazolylmethyl)amine] were synthesized and characterized (m‐nba, p‐nba, and p‐nbat are the anions of p‐nitrobenzoic acid, m‐nitrobenzoic acid, and p‐nitrobenzeneacetic acid, respectively). The complexes were investigated by X‐ray single crystal diffraction, elemental analysis as well as IR and fluorescence spectroscopy. Compounds 1 – 3 contain a distorted pentagonal bipyramidal coordination sphere with Cd^II coordinated by two carboxylate ligands in bidentate‐chelating mode, whereas complex 4 exhibits a distorted octahedral arrangement with one carboxylate ligand in bidentate‐chelating and the other in monodentate coordination mode. 1 and 2 form a 1D chain interplayed by hydrogen bonding and strong π–π stacking interactions. 3 and 4 vary from 1D chain into 2D single‐layer and double‐layer networks because of more extensive hydrogen bonding interactions. The complexes show emission maxima in the blue region in the solid state and emission bands are red‐shifted compared to those of the free ligands.     

fac‐Tri­carbonyl(4,4′‐di­methyl‐2,2′‐bi­pyridine)­tri­phenyl­tin(II)­rhenium(I)

The title organometallic compound, fac‐tri­carbonyl‐2κ³C‐(4,4′‐di­methyl‐2,2′‐bi­pyridine)‐2κ²N,N′‐tri­phenyl‐1κ³C¹‐tin(II)­rhenium(I)(Sn—Re), [ReSn(C₆H₅)₃(C₁₂H₁₂N₂)(CO)₃], con­tains three unique π–π stacking interactions. The result is an infinite chain of uninterrupted alternating intra‐ and intermolecular offset π–π stacking interactions throughout the crystal lattice. This extended π–π stacking arrangement, and an additional isolated intramolecular π–π interaction between the remaining 4,4′‐di­methyl‐2,2′‐bi­pyridine ring and a second phenyl group, impose geometric constraints on the Re and Sn atoms, yielding distorted octahedral and tetrahedral coordinations, respectively, for the metal centers.     

π–π stacking motifs in dialkylbis{5‐[(E)‐2‐aryldiazen‐1‐yl]‐2‐hydroxybenzoato}tin(IV) complexes

The diorganotin(IV) complexes of 5‐[(E)‐2‐aryldiazen‐1‐yl]‐2‐hydroxybenzoic acid are of interest because of their structural diversity in the crystalline state and their interesting biological activity. The structures of dimethylbis{2‐hydroxy‐5‐[(E)‐2‐(4‐methylphenyl)diazen‐1‐yl]benzoato}tin(IV), [Sn(CH₃)₂(C₁₄H₁₁N₂O₃)₂], and di‐n‐butylbis{2‐hydroxy‐5‐[(E)‐2‐(4‐methylphenyl)diazen‐1‐yl]benzoato}tin(IV) benzene hemisolvate, [Sn(C₄H₉)₂(C₁₄H₁₁N₂O₃)₂]·0.5C₆H₆, exhibit the usual skew‐trapezoidal bipyramidal coordination geometry observed for related complexes of this class. Each structure has two independent molecules of the Sn^IV complex in the asymmetric unit. In the dimethyltin structure, intermolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds and a very weak Sn…O interaction link the independent molecules into dimers. The planar carboxylate ligands lend themselves to π–π stacking interactions and the diversity of supramolecular structural motifs formed by these interactions has been examined in detail for these two structures and four closely related analogues. While there are some recurring basic motifs amongst the observed stacking arrangements, such as dimers and step‐like chains, variations through longitudinal slipping and inversion of the direction of the overlay add complexity. The π–π stacking motifs in the two title complexes are combinations of some of those observed in the other structures and are the most complex of the structures examined.     

4‐Methoxy‐1‐naphthol: chains formed by O—H...O hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking interactions

The structure of 4‐methoxy‐1‐naphthol, C₁₁H₁₀O₂, (I), contains an intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond which links the molecules into a simple C(2) chain running parallel to the shortest crystallographic b axis. This chain is reinforced by intermolecular π–π stacking interactions. Comparisons are drawn between the crystal structure of (I) and those of several of its simple analogues, including 1‐naphthol and some monosubstituted derivatives, and that of its isomer 7‐methoxy‐2‐naphthol. This comparison shows a close similarity in the packing of the molecules of its simple analogues that form π‐stacks along the shortest crystallographic axes. A substantial spatial overlap is observed between adjacent molecules in such stacks. In this group of monosubstituted naphthols, the overlap depends mainly on the position of the substituents carried by the naphthalene moiety, and the extent of the overlap depends on the substituent type. By contrast with (I), in the crystal structure of the isomeric 7‐methoxy‐2‐naphthol there are no O—H...O hydrogen bonds or π–π stacking interactions, and sheets are formed by O—H...π and C—H...π interactions.     

Structures and Properties of Spherical 90‐Vertex Fullerene‐Like Nanoballs

By applying the proper stoichiometry of 1:2 to [Cp^RFe(η⁵‐P₅)] and CuX (X=Cl, Br) and dilution conditions in mixtures of CH₃CN and solvents like CH₂Cl₂, 1,2‐Cl₂C₆H₄, toluene, and THF, nine spherical giant molecules having the simplified general formula [Cp^RFe(η⁵‐P₅)]@[{Cp^RFe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂{CuX}₂₅(CH₃CN)₁₀] (Cp^R=η⁵‐C₅Me₅ (Cp*); η⁵‐C₅Me₄Et (Cp^Et); X=Cl, Br) have been synthesized and structurally characterized. The products consist of 90‐vertex frameworks consisting of non‐carbon atoms and forming fullerene‐like structural motifs. Besides the mostly neutral products, some charged derivatives have been isolated. These spherical giant molecules show an outer diameter of 2.24 (X=Cl) to 2.26 nm (X=Br) and have inner cavities of 1.28 (X=Cl) and 1.20 nm (X=Br) in size. In most instances the inner voids of these nanoballs encapsulate one molecule of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)], which reveals preferred orientations of π–π stacking between the cyclo‐P₅ rings of the guest and those of the host molecules. Moreover, π–π and σ–π interactions are also found in the packing motifs of the balls in the crystal lattice. Electrochemical investigations of these soluble molecules reveal one irreversible multi‐electron oxidation at E_p=0.615 V and two reduction steps (?1.10 and ?2.0 V), the first of which corresponds to about 12 electrons. Density functional calculations reveal that during oxidation and reduction the electrons are withdrawn or added to the surface of the spherical nanomolecules, and no Cu²⁺ species are involved.     

Synthesis,crystal structure and conformational analysis of an unexpected [1,5]dithiocine product of aminopyridine and thiovanillin

The condensation reaction of 2‐mercapto‐3‐methoxybenzaldehyde with 3‐aminopyridine afforded an unexpected N‐alkylated [1,5]dithiocine instead of the N‐salicylideneaniline. The proposed mechanism for this condensation involves a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond between the thiol and the amine groups, leading to a second condensation. The corresponding product, i.e. 4,10‐dimethoxy‐13‐(pyridin‐3‐yl)‐6H,12H‐6,12‐epiminodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dithiocine methanol 0.463‐solvate, C₂₁H₁₈N₂O₂S₂·0.463CH₃OH, was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The supramolecular structure shows π–π stacking and S…S interactions in the crystal packing. Within the asymmetric unit, two geometries of the N atom are observed. Although a planar geometry should be expected, a pyramidal one is observed due to the crystal packing. The presence of the two geometries was further supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations that show an electronic energy difference of less than 2 kJ mol^?1 between the two conformers.     

Theoretical study of {Au3(CH3NCOCH3)3}n·{2,4,7‐trinitro‐9‐fluorenone} (n = 1,2) complexes

The interaction between {Au₃(CH₃N?COCH₃)₃} and {2,4,7‐trinitro‐9‐fluorenone} and the electronic structure and spectroscopic properties of {Au₃(CH₃N = COCH₃)₃}_n·{2,4,7‐trinitro‐9‐fluorenone} (n = 1,2) are studied at the HF, MP2, and PBE levels. Secondary π‐interactions (Au‐fluorenone) were found to be the main contribution to short‐range stability in the {Au₃(CH₃N?COCH₃)₃}_n·{2,4,7‐trinitro‐9‐fluorenone} complex. At the MP2 and PBE levels, Au‐C equilibrium distances of 292.3 and 304.0 pm and interaction energies of 105.3 and 24.9 kJ/mol were found, respectively. The absorption spectra of these complexes were calculated by the single excitation time‐dependent method at the PBE level. The theoretical values obtained are in agreement with the experimental range. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2010     

(4‐Bromo‐2‐formyl­phenolato)­perchlorato­(1,10‐phenanthroline)­copper(II)

In the title copper(II) compound, [Cu(C₇H₄BrO₂)(ClO₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)], the Cu atom is five‐coordinated in a distorted square‐pyramidal geometry by the N‐ and O‐donors of 4‐bromo‐2‐formyl­phenolate, 1,10‐phenanthroline and perchlorate. Pairs of complexes are linked together by Cu⋯O(phenolate) and π–π stacking inter­actions between 4‐bromo‐2‐formyl­phenolate and 1,10‐phenanthroline. Along the crystallographic a axis, the dimers are linked by hydrogen bonds between a perchlorate O atom and a 4‐bromo‐2‐formyl­phenolate H atom, and by further π–π stacking inter­actions. Hydrogen bonding between the Br atom and a 1,10‐phenanthroline H atom takes place between the stacks of dimers.     

Preparation of Hydride‐Ethylene Complexes of Osmium

Ethylene complexes [OsH(η²‐CH₂=CH₂)L₄]Y ( 1 , 2 ) [L = PPh(OEt)₂, P(OEt)₃; Y = OTf, BPh₄] were prepared by reacting the dihydride OsH₂L₄ first with methyl triflate CH₃OTf and then with ethylene (1 atm). Alternatively, the compound [OsH(η²‐CH₂=CH₂){PPh(OEt)₂}₄]OTf was prepared by allowing the dinitrogen derivative [OsH(N₂){PPh(OEt)₂}₄]OTf to react with ethylene. Acrylonitrile CH₂=C(H)CN reacts with OsH(OTf)L₄ [L = P(OEt)₃] to give the complex [OsH{κ¹‐NCC(H)=CH₂}{P(OEt)₃}₄]BPh₄ ( 3 ). The complexes were characterized spectroscopically (IR and ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR) and by X‐ray crystal structure determination of the [OsH(η²‐CH₂=CH₂){PPh(OEt)₂}₄]BPh₄ derivative.