Characterizations of trees with equal domination parameters

Let G = (V, E) be a graph. A set S ⊆ V is a restrained dominating set, if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S and to a vertex in V − S. The restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ_r(G), is the minimum cardinality of a restrained dominating set of G. A set S ⊆ V is a weak dominating set of G if, for every u in V − S, there exists a v ∈ S such that uv ∈ E and deg u ≥ deg v. The weak domination number of G, denoted by γ_w(G), is the minimum cardinality of a weak dominating set of G. In this article, we provide a constructive characterization of those trees with equal independent domination and restrained domination numbers. A constructive characterization of those trees with equal independent domination and weak domination numbers is also obtained. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34: 142–153, 2000     

The Conditional Covering Problem on Unweighted Interval Graphs with Nonuniform Coverage Radius

Let G = (V, E) be an interval graph with n vertices and m edges. A positive integer R(x) is associated with every vertex x ? V{x\in V}. In the conditional covering problem, a vertex x ? V{x \in V} covers a vertex y ? V{y \in V} (x ≠ y) if d(x, y) ≤ R(x) where d(x, y) is the shortest distance between the vertices x and y. The conditional covering problem (CCP) finds a minimum cardinality vertex set C í V{C\subseteq V} so as to cover all the vertices of the graph and every vertex in C is also covered by another vertex of C. This problem is NP-complete for general graphs. In this paper, we propose an efficient algorithm to solve the CCP with nonuniform coverage radius in O(n ²) time, when G is an interval graph containing n vertices.     

Convex Sets Under Some Graph Operations

 Given a connected graph G, we say that a set C⊆V(G) is convex in G if, for every pair of vertices x,y∈C, the vertex set of every x-y geodesic in G is contained in C. The cardinality of a maximal proper convex set in G is the convexity number of G. In this paper, we characterize the convex sets of graphs resulting from some binary operations, and compute the convexity numbers of the resulting graphs. Received: October, 2001 Final version received: September 4, 2002 Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank the referee for the helpful suggestions and useful comments.     

Graphs with a Minimal Number of Convex Sets

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G). A set C of vertices of G is g-convex if for every pair \({u, v \in C}\) the vertices on every u–v geodesic (i.e. shortest u–v path) belong to C. If the only g-convex sets of G are the empty set, V(G), all singletons and all edges, then G is called a g-minimal graph. It is shown that a graph is g-minimal if and only if it is triangle-free and if it has the property that the convex hull of every pair of non-adjacent vertices is V(G). Several properties of g-minimal graphs are established and it is shown that every triangle-free graph is an induced subgraph of a g-minimal graph. Recursive constructions of g-minimal graphs are described and bounds for the number of edges in these graphs are given. It is shown that the roots of the generating polynomials of the number of g-convex sets of each size of a g-minimal graphs are bounded, in contrast to their behaviour over all graphs. A set C of vertices of a graph is m-convex if for every pair \({u, v \in C}\) , the vertices of every induced u–v path belong to C. A graph is m-minimal if it has no m-convex sets other than the empty set, the singletons, the edges and the entire vertex set. Sharp bounds on the number of edges in these graphs are given and graphs that are m-minimal are shown to be precisely the 2-connected, triangle-free graphs for which no pair of adjacent vertices forms a vertex cut-set.     

On constructible graphs,locally Helly graphs,and convexity

A (finite or infinite) graph G is constructible if there exists a well‐ordering ≤ of its vertices such that for every vertex x which is not the smallest element, there is a vertex y < x which is adjacent to x and to every neighbor z of x with z < x. Particular constructible graphs are Helly graphs and connected bridged graphs. In this paper we study a new class of constructible graphs, the class of locally Helly graphs. A graph G is locally Helly if, for every pair (x,y) of vertices of G whose distance is d ≥ 2, there exists a vertex whose distance to x is d ? 1 and which is adjacent to y and to all neighbors of y whose distance to x is at most d. Helly graphs are locally Helly, and the converse holds for finite graphs. Among different properties we prove that a locally Helly graph is strongly dismantable, hence cop‐win, if and only if it contains no isometric rays. We show that a locally Helly graph G is finitely Helly, that is, every finite family of pairwise non‐disjoint balls of G has a non‐empty intersection. We give a sufficient condition by forbidden subgraphs so that the three concepts of Helly graphs, of locally Helly graphs and of finitely Helly graphs are equivalent. Finally, generalizing different results, in particular those of Bandelt and Chepoi 1 about Helly graphs and bridged graphs, we prove that the Helly number h(G) of the geodesic convexity in a constructible graph G is equal to its clique number ω(G), provided that ω(G) is finite. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 43: 280–298, 2003     

On geodesic structures of weakly median graphs—II: Compactness, the role of isometric rays

We prove that the vertex set of a K_ℵ0-free weakly median graph G endowed with the weak topology associated with the geodesic convexity on V(G) is compact if and only if G has one of the following equivalent properties: (1) G contains no isometric rays; (2) any chain of interval of G ordered by inclusion is finite; (3) every self-contraction of G fixes a non-empty finite regular weakly median subgraph of G. We study the self-contractions of K_ℵ0-free weakly median graphs which fix no finite set of vertices. We also follow a suggestion of Imrich and Klavzar [Product Graphs, Wiley, New York, 2000] by defining different centers of such a graph G, each of them giving rise to a non-empty finite regular weakly median subgraph of G which is fixed by all automorphisms of G.     

On the Structure of Graphs with Bounded Asteroidal Number

 A set A⊆V of the vertices of a graph G=(V,E) is an asteroidal set if for each vertex a∈A, the set A\{a} is contained in one component of G−N[a]. The maximum cardinality of an asteroidal set of G, denoted by an (G), is said to be the asteroidal number of G. We investigate structural properties of graphs of bounded asteroidal number. For every k≥1, an (G)≤k if and only if an (H)≤k for every minimal triangulation H of G. A dominating target is a set D of vertices such that D∪S is a dominating set of G for every set S such that G[D∪S] is connected. We show that every graph G has a dominating target with at most an (G) vertices. Finally, a connected graph G has a spanning tree T such that d _T (x,y)−d _G (x,y)≤3·|D|−1 for every pair x,y of vertices and every dominating target D of G. Received: July 3, 1998 Final version received: August 10, 1999     

Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three

A set S of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set, if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G), is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. We prove that, if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree at least 3, then γ_t(G) ≤ 7n/13. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34:9–19, 2000     

On Trees with Double Domination Number Equal to the 2-Outer-Independent Domination Number Plus One

A vertex of a graph is said to dominate itself and all of its neighbors.A double dominating set of a graph G is a set D of vertices of G,such that every vertex of G is dominated by at least two vertices of D.The double domination number of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a double dominating set of G.For a graph G =(V,E),a subset D V(G) is a 2-dominating set if every vertex of V(G) \ D has at least two neighbors in D,while it is a 2-outer-independent dominating set of G if additionally the set V(G)\D is independent.The 2-outer-independent domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a 2-outer-independent dominating set of G.This paper characterizes all trees with the double domination number equal to the 2-outer-independent domination number plus one.     

On packing 3‐vertex paths in a graph

Let G be a connected graph and let eb(G) and λ(G) denote the number of end‐blocks and the maximum number of disjoint 3‐vertex paths Λ in G. We prove the following theorems on claw‐free graphs: (t1) if G is claw‐free and eb(G) ≤ 2 (and in particular, G is 2‐connected) then λ(G) = ⌊| V(G)|/3⌋; (t2) if G is claw‐free and eb(G) ≥ 2 then λ(G) ≥ ⌊(| V(G) | − eb(G) + 2)/3 ⌋; and (t3) if G is claw‐free and Δ^*‐free then λ(G) = ⌊| V(G) |/3⌋ (here Δ^* is a graph obtained from a triangle Δ by attaching to each vertex a new dangling edge). We also give the following sufficient condition for a graph to have a Λ‐factor: Let n and p be integers, 1 ≤ p ≤ n − 2, G a 2‐connected graph, and |V(G)| = 3n. Suppose that G − S has a Λ‐factor for every S ⊆ V(G) such that |S| = 3p and both V(G) − S and S induce connected subgraphs in G. Then G has a Λ‐factor. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 175–197, 2001     

Induced Matching Extendable Graph Powers

A graph G is called induced matching extendable (shortly, IM-extendable) if every induced matching of G is included in a perfect matching of G. A graph G is called strongly IM-extendable if every spanning supergraph of G is IM-extendable. The k-th power of a graph G, denoted by G^k, is the graph with vertex set V(G) in which two vertices are adjacent if and only if the distance between them in G is at most k. We obtain the following two results which give positive answers to two conjectures of Yuan. Result 1. If a connected graph G with |V(G)| even is locally connected, then G² is strongly IM-extendable. Result 2. If G is a 2-connected graph with |V(G)| even, then G³ is strongly IM-extendable. Research Supported by NSFC Fund 10371102.     

Geodetic and Steiner geodetic sets in 3-Steiner distance hereditary graphs

Let G be a connected graph and S⊆V(G). Then the Steiner distance of S, denoted by d_G(S), is the smallest number of edges in a connected subgraph of G containing S. Such a subgraph is necessarily a tree called a Steiner tree for S. The Steiner interval for a set S of vertices in a graph, denoted by I(S) is the union of all vertices that belong to some Steiner tree for S. If S={u,v}, then I(S) is the interval I[u,v] between u and v. A connected graph G is 3-Steiner distance hereditary (3-SDH) if, for every connected induced subgraph H of order at least 3 and every set S of three vertices of H, d_H(S)=d_G(S). The eccentricity of a vertex v in a connected graph G is defined as e(v)=max{d(v,x)|x∈V(G)}. A vertex v in a graph G is a contour vertex if for every vertex u adjacent with v, e(u)?e(v). The closure of a set S of vertices, denoted by I[S], is defined to be the union of intervals between pairs of vertices of S taken over all pairs of vertices in S. A set of vertices of a graph G is a geodetic set if its closure is the vertex set of G. The smallest cardinality of a geodetic set of G is called the geodetic number of G and is denoted by g(G). A set S of vertices of a connected graph G is a Steiner geodetic set for G if I(S)=V(G). The smallest cardinality of a Steiner geodetic set of G is called the Steiner geodetic number of G and is denoted by sg(G). We show that the contour vertices of 3-SDH and HHD-free graphs are geodetic sets. For 3-SDH graphs we also show that g(G)?sg(G). An efficient algorithm for finding Steiner intervals in 3-SDH graphs is developed.     

Connected subgraphs with small degree sums in 3‐connected planar graphs

It is well‐known that every planar graph has a vertex of degree at most five. Kotzig proved that every 3‐connected planar graph has an edge xy such that deg(x) + deg (y) ≤ 13. In this article, considering a similar problem for the case of three or more vertices that induce a connected subgraph, we show that, for a given positive integer t, every 3‐connected planar graph G with |V(G)| ≥ t has a connected subgraph H of order t such that Σ_x∈V(H) deg_G(x) ≤ 8t − 1. As a tool for proving this result, we consider decompositions of 3‐connected planar graphs into connected subgraphs of order at least t and at most 2t − 1. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 30: 191–203, 1999     

On geodetic sets formed by boundary vertices

Let G be a finite simple connected graph. A vertex v is a boundary vertex of G if there exists a vertex u such that no neighbor of v is further away from u than v. We obtain a number of properties involving different types of boundary vertices: peripheral, contour and eccentric vertices. Before showing that one of the main results in [G. Chartrand, D. Erwin, G.L. Johns, P. Zhang, Boundary vertices in graphs, Discrete Math. 263 (2003) 25-34] does not hold for one of the cases, we establish a realization theorem that not only corrects the mentioned wrong statement but also improves it.Given S⊆V(G), its geodetic closure I[S] is the set of all vertices lying on some shortest path joining two vertices of S. We prove that the boundary vertex set ∂(G) of any graph G is geodetic, that is, I[∂(G)]=V(G). A vertex v belongs to the contour Ct(G) of G if no neighbor of v has an eccentricity greater than v. We present some sufficient conditions to guarantee the geodeticity of either the contour Ct(G) or its geodetic closure I[Ct(G)].     

The Cendian of a Tree

The eccentricity e(x) and the distance sum s(x) of a vertex x of a connected graph G are well-known functions which measure the centrality of the vertex x in G. The set of vertices which minimize e(x) is called the center of G and the set of vertices which minimize s(x) is known as the median. In this paper we introduce the idea of the so-called cendian of a graph, which unifies the concepts of center and median, and study its structure in trees.     

The symmetric (2k,k)‐graphs

A noncomplete graph G is called an (n, k)‐graph if it is n‐connected and G − X is not (n − |X| + 1)‐connected for any X ⊆ V(G) with |X| ≤ k. Mader conjectured that for k ≥ 3 the graph K_{2k + 2} − (1‐factor) is the unique (2k, k)‐graph. We settle this conjecture for strongly regular graphs, for edge transitive graphs, and for vertex transitive graphs. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 35–51, 2001     

Super-connectivity and super-edge-connectivity for some interconnection networks

Let G=(V,E) be a k-regular graph with connectivity κ and edge connectivity λ. G is maximum connected if κ=k, and G is maximum edge connected if λ=k. Moreover, G is super-connected if it is a complete graph, or it is maximum connected and every minimum vertex cut is {x|(v,x)E} for some vertex vV; and G is super-edge-connected if it is maximum edge connected and every minimum edge disconnecting set is {(v,x)|(v,x)E} for some vertex vV. In this paper, we present three schemes for constructing graphs that are super-connected and super-edge-connected. Applying these construction schemes, we can easily discuss the super-connected property and the super-edge-connected property of hypercubes, twisted cubes, crossed cubes, möbius cubes, split-stars, and recursive circulant graphs.     

Roman and Total Domination

Abstract

A set S of vertices is a total dominating set of a graph G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set is the total domination number ^γt(G). A Roman dominating function on a graph G is a function f : V (G) → {0, 1, 2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u with f (u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v of G for which f (v)=2. The minimum of f (V (G))=∑_{u ∈ V (G)} f (u) over all such functions is called the Roman domination number γR (G). We show that γt(G) ≤ γR (G) with equality if and only if ^γt(G)=2γ(G), where γ(G) is the domination number of G. Moreover, we characterize the extremal graphs for some graph families.     

Dominating sets of the comaximal and ideal-based zero-divisor graphs of commutative rings

Abstract

Let R be a commutative ring with nonzero identity, and let I be an ideal of R. The ideal-based zero-divisor graph of R, denoted by Γ_I (R), is the graph whose vertices are the set {x ∈ R \ I| xy ∈ I for some y∈ R \ I} and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if xy ∈ I. Define the comaximal graph of R, denoted by CG(R), to be a graph whose vertices are the elements of R, where two distinct vertices a and b are adjacent if and only if Ra+Rb=R. A nonempty set S ? V of a graph G=(V, E) is a dominating set of G if every vertex in V is either in S or is adjacent to a vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) of G is the minimum cardinality among the dominating sets of G. The main object of this paper is to study the dominating sets and domination number of Γ_I (R) and the comaximal graph CG₂(R) \ J (R) (or CGJ (R) for short) where CG₂(R) is the subgraph of CG(R) induced on the nonunit elements of R and J (R) is the Jacobson radical of R.     

Edge disjoint Steiner trees in graphs without large bridges

A set A of vertices of an undirected graph G is called k‐edge‐connected in G if for all pairs of distinct vertices a, b∈A, there exist k edge disjoint a, b‐paths in G. An A‐tree is a subtree of G containing A, and an A‐bridge is a subgraph B of G which is either formed by a single edge with both end vertices in A or formed by the set of edges incident with the vertices of some component of G ? A. It is proved that (i) if A is k·(? + 2)‐edge‐connected in G and every A‐bridge has at most ? vertices in V(G) ? A or at most ? + 2 vertices in A then there exist k edge disjoint A‐trees, and that (ii) if A is k‐edge‐connected in G and B is an A‐bridge such that B is a tree and every vertex in V(B) ? A has degree 3 then either A is k‐edge‐connected in G ? e for some e∈E(B) or A is (k ? 1)‐edge‐connected in G ? E(B). © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 62: 188–198, 2009