Reflection–absorption infrared spectroscopy investigation of the crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) ultrathin films

Reflection–absorption infrared spectroscopy was used to study the crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) ultrathin films. The crystallinity of ultrathin films was estimated by the fraction of trans conformers of PET. The isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of ultrathin films with different thicknesses were investigated. The thinner PET film showed slower kinetics during isothermal crystallization than the thicker film. Moreover, the final crystallinity of films with various thicknesses were reduced with decreasing thickness. An Avrami equation was used to fit the acquired results. The Avrami exponents decreased with the film thickness. As for the nonisothermal crystallization, the cold‐crystallization starting temperature shifted to a lower temperature as the film thickness increased. The influence of the substrate on the crystallization kinetics of the films was also studied. The half‐crystallization times and final crystallinities of ultrathin films adsorbed onto a self‐assembled‐monolayer‐treated surface and an untreated substrate were clearly different, although their thickness dependence was similar. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 4440–4447, 2004     

Isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/barite nanocomposites

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/Barite nanocomposites were prepared by direct melt compounding. The effects of PET‐Barite interfacial interaction on the dynamic mechanical properties and crystallization were investigated by DMA and DSC. The results showed that Barite can act as a nucleating agent and the nucleation activity can be increased when the Barite was surface‐modified (SABarite). SABarite nanoparticles induced preferential lamellae orientation because of the strong interfacial interaction between PET chains and SABarite nanoparticles, which was not the case in Barite filled PET as determined by WAXD. For PET/Barite nanocomposites, the Avrami exponent n increased with increasing crystallization temperature. Although at the same crystallization temperature, the n value will decrease with increasing SABarite content, indicating of the enhancement of the nucleation activity. Avrami analyses suggest that the nucleation mechanism is different. The activation energy determined from Arrhenius equation reduced dramatically for PET/SABarite nanocomposite, confirming the strong interfacial interaction between PET chains and SABarite nanoparticles can reduce the crystallization free energy barrier for nucleus formation. In the DSC scan after isothermal crystallization process, double melting behavior was found. And the double endotherms could be attributed to the melting of recrystallized less perfect crystallites or the secondary lamellae produced during different crystallization processes. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 655–668, 2009     

Isothermal crystallization kinetics of PEO in poly(ethylene terephthalate)–poly(ethylene oxide) segmented copolymers. I. Effect of the soft‐block length

The isothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) block in two poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)–PEO segmented copolymers was studied with differential scanning calorimetry. The Avrami equation failed to describe the overall crystallization process, but a modified Avrami equation, the Q equation, did. The crystallizability of the PET block and the different lengths of the PEO block exerted strong influences on the crystallization process, the crystallinity, and the final morphology of the PEO block. The mechanism of nucleation and the growth dimension of the PEO block were different because of the crystallizability of the PET block and the compositional heterogeneity. The crystallization of the PEO block was physically constrained by the microstructure of the PET crystalline phase, which resulted in a lower crystallization rate. However, this influence became weak with the increase in the soft‐block length. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 3230–3238, 2000     

New insight into melting and crystallization behavior in semicrystalline poly(ethylene terephthalate)

After isothermal crystallization, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) showed double endothermic behavior in the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) heating scan. During the heating scans of semicrystalline PET, a metastable melt which comes from melting thinner lamellar crystal populations formed between the low and the upper endothermic temperatures. The metastable melt can recrystallize immediately just above the low melting temperature and form thicker lamellae than the original ones. The thickness and perfection depends on the crystallization time and crystallization temperature. The crystallization kinetics of this metastable melt can be determined by means of DSC. The kinetics analysis showed that the isothermal crystallization of the metastable PET melt proceeds with an Avrami exponent of n = 1.0 ∼ 1.2, probably reflecting one‐dimensional or irregular line growth of the crystal occurring between the existing main lamellae with heterogeneous nucleation. This is in agreement with the hypothesis that the melting peaks are associated with two distinct crystal populations with different thicknesses. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 53–60, 2000     

Crystallization behavior of P(EN‐co‐ET) copolyesters: Crystallization kinetics and morphology revealed by DSC,time‐resolved SAXS analysis,and TEM

The crystallization kinetics and morphology of PEN/PET copolyesters were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), time‐resolved small‐angle X‐ray scattering (TR‐SAXS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The Avrami exponents obtained using DSC were approximately 3 for homo PEN and 4 for all the copolyesters. The 3‐parameter Avrami model was successfully fitted to the invariants with respect to the time obtained from TR‐SAXS, and the exponent values were similar to those obtained from DSC. Moreover, the Avrami rate constants obtained from TR‐SAXS showed marked temperature‐sensitive decreases in all samples, like those obtained from DSC. This indicates that not only could changes in morphological parameters be obtained from the analysis of TR‐SAXS data but also crystallization kinetics. The changes in the morphological parameters determined from the SAXS data indicate that the minor components, dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) segments, are rejected into the amorphous phase during crystallization. In the TEM study, copolyesters crystallized at temperature above 240 °C grew into both the α‐ and β‐form, although 240 °C is the optimum condition for the β‐form crystal. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 805–816, 2005     

Morphology and nonisothermal crystallization of in situ microfibrillar poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene blend fabricated through slit‐extrusion,hot‐stretch quenching

This study describes the morphology and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/isotactic polypropylene (iPP) in situ micro‐fiber‐reinforced blends (MRB) obtained via slit‐extrusion, hot‐stretching quenching. For comparison purposes, neat PP and PET/PP common blends are also included. Morphological observation indicated that the well‐defined microfibers are in situ generated by the slit‐extrusion, hot‐stretching quenching process. Neat iPP and PET/iPP common blends showed the normal spherulite morphology, whereas the PET/iPP microfibrillar blend had typical transcrystallites at 1 wt % PET concentration. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of three samples were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Applying the theories proposed by Jeziorny, Ozawa, and Liu to analyze the crystallization kinetics of neat PP and PET/PP common and microfibrillar blends, agreement was found between our experimental results and Liu's prediction. The increases of crystallization temperature and crystallization rate during the nonisothermal crystallization process indicated that PET in situ microfibers have significant nucleation ability for the crystallization of a PP matrix phase. The crystallization peaks in the DSC curves of the three materials examined widened and shifted to lower temperature when the cooling rate was increased. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 374–385, 2004     

Block copolymers of poly(ethylene terephthalate–polybutylene terephthalate). I. Preparation and crystallization behavior

Block copolymers of two crystallizable compounds, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), were developed with PET as the major component and the amount of PBT varying from 1.0 to 20.0 wt %. These block copolymers were prepared by end-group coupling of preformed oligomers. All polymers prepared were of equivalent molecular weight as determined by the intrinsic viscosity method. Thermal properties were determined by differential thermal analysis (DTA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). With increasing PBT content, the block copolymers showed a general decrease in the values of glass transition temperature, melting temperature, initial decomposition temperature, and maximum decomposition temperature. The heat of fusion and heat of crystallization first increased and then decreased slightly. Rates of crystallization were determined by measuring density as a function of time of isothermal crystallization carried out at 95°C. It was found that small amounts of PBT increased the crystallization rate considerably over that of PET. Random copolymers did not show this phenomenon and behaved more like pure PET. The crystallization behavior of block copolymers was analyzed by the Avrami equation and Avrami exponents were determined. Results were explained on the basis that the faster-crystallizing PBT blocks crystallized first and provided built-in nucleation sites for the subsequent crystallization of PET, thus resulting in a relatively fast-crystallizing copolyester.     

Crystallization and morphology of polymerized cyclic butylene terephthalate

The crystallization behavior and morphology of polymerized cyclic butylene terephthalate (pCBT) were investigated by thermal differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized light microscopy (PLM). The spherulite growth rate was analyzed based on the Hoffman and Lauritzen theory to better understand the crystallization behavior. We found four typical morphologic features of pCBT corresponding to the crystallization temperature spectrum: usual negative spherulite, unusual spherulite, mixed birefringence spherulite coexisting with boundary crystals, and highly disordered spherulitic crystallites. The Avrami crystallization kinetics confirmed the occurrence of combined heterogeneous nucleation accompanied by a change in the spherulitic shape of pCBT, which also agreed with the PLM results. The equilibrium melting temperature and glass transition temperature of pCBT were 257.8 °C and 41.1 °C, respectively. A regime II–III transition occurred at 200.9 °C, which was 10 °C lower than that reported for poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). Coinciding with and attributed to the regime transition, the boundary crystal disappeared at temperatures above 200 °C and the morphology changed from the mixed type to highly disordered spherulitic crystallites. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 1127–1134, 2010     

Isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behaviour of PET/ATO nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization

Neat poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and PET/antimony doped tin oxide (ATO) nanocomposites were prepared by in situ polymerization. The study of the isothermal crystallization behaviors of neat PET and PET/ATO nanocomposites was carried out using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The crystallization kinetics under isothermal conditions could be described by the Avrami equation. For neat PET and PET/ATO nanocomposites, the Avrami exponent n both decreased with increasing crystallization temperature. In addition, for the same crystallization temperature, the value of n increased with increasing ATO content. These suggested that the crystallization types related to the values of n in the Avrami theory could not be suitable for the crystallization of PET and its nanocomposites. The change of the n values indicated that the addition of ATO resulted in the increase of the crystallizing growth points. That is a heterogeneous nucleating effect of ATO on crystallization of PET. In the DSC scan after isothermal crystallization process, multiple melting behavior was found. And the multiple endotherms could be attributed to melting of the recrystallized materials or the secondary lamellae produced during different crystallization processes. The equilibrium melting temperature of PET in the nanocomposites increased with increasing the ATO content. Surface free energy of PET chain folding for crystallization of PET/ATO nanocomposites was lower than that of neat PET, confirming the heterogeneous nucleation effect of ATO.     

Melting and crystallization behavior of poly(vinylidene fluoride) produced isothermally in the intercrystalline spaces of poly(ethylene terephthalate) from its blends

The melting of isothermally crystallized poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVF₂), produced in the intercrystalline spaces of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) from its blends, showed a unique behavior: the melting temperature decreased with the increasing crystallinity of PVF₂ (i.e., with increasing crystallization time) for PVF₂ volume fractions of 0.64 and 0.51. The melting temperature of already crystallized PET also decreased as the PVF₂ crystallization progressed and the isothermal crystallization temperature of PVF₂ increased. Separate reasons were proposed to account for these behaviors. The equilibrium melting temperatures of PVF₂ in the blends, measured by the Hoffman–Weeks extrapolation procedure, were used to calculate the polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ₂₁); only the noncrystallized portion of PET contributing to the mixed amorphous phase was considered. The χ₂₁value (−1.75) was lower than χ₁₂ (−0.14), calculated from the melting temperature depression of PET. However, when they were normalized to the unit volumes of the respective components, the two values were found to be the same. The crystallization rate of PVF₂ decreased with an increasing volume fraction of PET in the blend. The Avrami exponent increased for the volume fraction of PVF₂ (0.77) and then progressively decreased with an increasing volume fraction of PET. A gradual change in the nature of the regime transition from regime II/regime I to regime III/regime II with increasing PET concentration was observed. The value of the chain-extension factor of PVF₂ significantly increased with an increase in the PET concentration in the blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 2215–2227, 2004     

Nonisothermal cold‐crystallization kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)

The nonisothermal cold‐crystallization kinetics and subsequent melting behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry. The Avrami, Tobin, and Ozawa equations were applied to describe the kinetics of the crystallization process. Both the Avrami and Tobin crystallization rate parameters increased with the heating rate. The Ozawa crystallization rate increased with the temperature. The ability of PTT to crystallize from the glassy state at a unit heating rate was determined with Ziabicki's kinetic crystallizability index, which was found to be about 0.89. The effective energy barrier describing the nonisothermal cold‐crystallization process of PTT was estimated by the differential isoconversional method of Friedman and was found to range between about 114.5 and 158.8 kJ mol^?1. In its subsequent melting, PTT exhibited double‐melting behavior for heating rates lower than or equal to 10 °C min^?1 and single‐melting behavior for heating rates greater than or equal to 12.5 °C min^?1. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 4151–4163, 2004     

Crystallization kinetics of PGBG4: A sequential poly(ester amide) derived from glycine, 1,4‐butanediol,and adipic acid

Isothermal crystallization kinetics of a new sequential poly(ester amide) derived from glycine, 1,4‐butanediol, and adipic acid was investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. The Avrami analysis was performed to obtain the kinetic parameters of primary and secondary crystallization. The experimental data indicate a heterogeneous nucleation with spherical growth geometry for the primary crystallization, whereas a linear growth within formed spherulites is characteristic of the last crystallization stages. The Lauritzen–Hoffman analysis was also undertaken to determine the different crystallization regimes, having estimated the corresponding nucleation constants. Temperature dependence of the normalized crystallization‐rate constants was tested with different theoretical equations. These allow an estimation of a temperature close to 90 °C for the maximum crystallization rate. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 903–912, 2003     

Calorimetric study of blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) and liquid crystalline copolyester

A calorimetric study of blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate-co-p-oxybenzoate), PET/PHB, with poly(butylene terephthalate), PBT has been carried out in the form of as-spun and drawn fibres. DSC melting and crystallization results show that PBT is compatible with LCP and the crystallization of PBT decreases by the addition of LCP in the matrix. The crystallization behaviour of blend fibres is investigated as a function of temperature of crystallization. A detailed analysis of the crystallization course has been made utilizing the Avrami expression. The isothermal calorimetric measurements provide evidence of decrease of rate of crystallization of PBT on addition of the liquid crystalline component up to about 50% by weight. The values of the Avrami exponents change in the temperature range from 200° to 215°C. Dimensionality changes in crystallization could be due to LCP mesophase-transition.     

Crystallization of polypropylene,nylon-66 and poly(ethylene terephthalate) at pressures to 200 MPa: Kinetics and characterization of products

The crystallization kinetics of polypropylene (PP), polyamide (PA66), and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were studied, using a pressure dilatometer (to 200 MPa) to follow the volume changes associated with the crystallization process. The commonly used Avrami equation fitted the isothermal/isobaric crystallization data of PP and PA66 well. The Avrami exponent n was between 1.3 and 1.7, independent of crystallization pressure and temperature. Lines of constant Avrami rate parameter Z in the P-T plane were essentially parallel to the pressure dependence of the melting points and crystallization temperatures. However, the Avrami equation was not suitable for PET. The Malkin, Dietz, and Kim equations provided better fits. The crystallization half-time of PET increased with pressure at constant supercooling, in contrast to PP and PA66, for which it remained essentially unchanged. X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, and pressure dilatometry were used to study the effect of formation pressure on the crystal structure, the melting point, and the density of products which were crystallized for short times (minutes) at various temperatures and pressures. No new crystal structures were found for PA66 and PET, but a mixture of monoclinic and triclinic crystals existed in PP above a formation pressure of 50 MPa. The melting points increased with formation pressure for PET, but remained unchanged for PP and PA66. Density at ambient conditions decreased with formation pressure for PP, but increased for PET and PA66. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Isothermal melt-crystallization and melting behavior for three linear aromatic polyesters

Isothermal crystallization and subsequent melting behavior for three different types of linear aromatic polyester, namely poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT), and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), were investigated (with an emphasis on PTT in comparison with PET and PBT). These polyesters were different in the number of methylene groups (i.e. 2, 3, and 4 for PET, PTT, and PBT, respectively). Isothermal crystallization studies were carried out in a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) over the crystallization temperature range of 182-208 °C. The wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) technique was used to obtain information about crystal modification and apparent degree of crystallinity. The kinetics of the crystallization process was assessed by a direct fitting of the experimental data to the Avrami, Tobin, and Malkin macrokinetic models. It was found that the crystallization rates of these polyesters were in the following order: PBT>PTT>PET, and the melting of these polyesters exhibited multiple-melting phenomenon. Lastly, the equilibrium melting temperature for these polyesters was estimated based on the linear and non-linear Hoffman-Weeks (LHW and NLHW) extrapolative methods.     

Crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate–co–isophthalate)

Melt crystallization behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) (PETI) containing 2 and 12 mol % of noncrystallizable isophthalate components were investigated. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) isothermal results revealed that the introduction of 2 mol % isophthalate into PET caused a change of the crystal growth process from a two‐dimensional to a three‐dimensional spherulitic growth. The addition of more isophthalate up to 12 mol % into the PET structure induced a change in the crystal growth from a three‐dimensional to a two‐dimensional crystal growth. DSC heating scans after completion of isothermal crystallization at various T_c's showed three melting endotherms for PET and four melting endotherms for PETI‐2 and PETI‐12. The presence of an additional melting endotherm is attributed to the melting of copolyester crystallite composed of ethylene glycol, tere‐phthalate, and isophthalate (IPA) or the melting of molecular chains near IPA formed by melting the secondary crystallite T_m (I) and then recrystallizing during heating. Analyses of both Avrami and Lauritzen‐Hoffman equations revealed that PETI containing 2 mol % of isophthalate had the highest Avrami exponent n, growth rate constant G_o, and product of lateral and end surface free energies σσ_e. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 2515–2524, 2000     

Isothermal crystallization studies of poly(butylene terephthalate) composites

Different crystallization kinetic models (Avrami and Tobin) have been applied to study the crystallization kinetics of virgin poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and filled PBT systems under isothermal experimental conditions. The experimental data have been analyzed with a nonlinear, multivariable regression program. The kinetic parameters for the isothermal crystallization have been determined. The analysis results indicate that both models satisfactorily represent the isothermal crystallization kinetics. PBT crystallizes most slowly. The presence of nanoclays or nanofibers, added as fillers, enhances the crystallization rate of PBT composites. An analysis of the kinetic data with the Avrami and Tobin models has shown little change in the crystallization exponent compared with that of virgin PBT. The crystallization rate constant decreases with a rise in the temperature for the two models. This trend has been observed for similar polyester systems reported in the literature. The dispersion of the clay layers in the PBT nanocomposites has been characterized with wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 1344–1353, 2007     

Isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(propylene terephthalate)

The kinetics of crystallization of poly(propylene terephthalate) (PPT) samples of different molecular weights were studied under both isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. The Avrami and Lauritzen–Hoffmann treatments were applied to evaluate kinetic parameters of PPT isothermal crystallization. It was found that crystallization is faster for low‐molecular‐weight samples. The modified Avrami equation, and the combined Avrami–Ozawa method were found to successfully describe the nonisothermal crystallization process. Also, the analysis of Lauritzen–Hoffmmann was tested and it resulted in values close to those obtained with isothermal crystallization data. The nonisothermal kinetic data were corrected for the effect of the temperature lag and shifted alone with the isothermal kinetic data to obtain a single master curve, according to the method of Chan and Isayev, testifying to the consistency between the isothermal and corrected nonisothermal data. A new method for ranking of polymers, referring to the crystallization rates, was also introduced. This involved a new index that combines the maximum crystallization rate observed during cooling with the average crystallization rates over the temperature range of the crystallization peak. Furthermore, the effective energy barrier of the dynamic process was evaluated with the isoconversional methods of Flynn and Friedmann. It was found that the energy barrier is lower for the low‐molecular‐weight PPT. The effect of the catalyst remnants on the crystallization kinetics was also investigated and it was found that this is significant only for low‐molecular‐weight samples. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 3775–3796, 2004     

Lamellar‐level morphology induced by combined crystallization and liquid–liquid demixing in a poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) blend

The lamellar‐level morphology of an extruded poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) blend was investigated with small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). Measurements were made as a function of the annealing time in the melt and the crystallization temperature. The characteristic morphological parameters at the lamellar level were determined by correlation function analysis of the SAXS data. At a low crystallization temperature of 120 °C, the increased amorphous layer thickness was identified in the blend, indicating that some PEN was incorporated into the interlamellar regions of PET during crystallization. The blend also showed a larger lamellar thickness than pure PET. A reason for the increase in the lamellar thickness might be that the formation of thinner lamellar stacks by secondary crystallization was significantly restricted because of the increased glass‐transition temperature. At high crystallization temperatures above 200 °C, the diffusion rates of noncrystallizable components were faster than the growth rates of crystals, with most of the noncrystallizable components escaping from the lamellar stacks. As a result, the blend showed an interfibrillar or interspherulitic morphology. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 317–324, 2002     

Comparison of statistical and blocky copolymers of ethylene terephthalate and ethylene 4,4′‐bibenzoate based on thermal behavior and oxygen transport properties

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was blended with a frustrated liquid‐crystalline polymer, poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐4,4′‐bibenzoate) (PETBB55), in the weight ratio 70:30. Under the melt conditions used for blending, NMR analysis showed that some transesterification had occurred. Accordingly, the blended product resembled a blocky copolymer more closely than it did a physical blend. A random copolymer with the same composition was synthesized for comparison. The study examined the effect of the comonomer distribution (blocky vs random) on the thermal behavior and oxygen transport properties of the glassy and cold‐drawn polymers. The glass‐transition temperatures and the crystallization behavior suggested that the PETBB55 blocks phase‐separated as very small domains. Higher levels of orientation, as indicated by higher densities and higher trans glycol fractions, were achieved by the cold drawing of the blocky copolymer. It was speculated that the cold drawing of the blocky copolymer at temperatures up to the glass‐transition temperature of the PETBB55 blocks produced highly oriented PETBB55 domains. Constraints imposed by connections between PET and the PETBB55 blocks prevented the relaxation of the continuous PET phase, even at temperatures well above the glass‐transition temperature of the PET blocks. In this sense, the blocky copolymer embodied the concept of a self‐reinforcing polymer. As a result, an improved oxygen barrier was obtained over a wider range of cold‐draw temperatures with the blocky copolymer. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 289–307, 2003