Miscibility and surface properties of fluorinated copolymer blends involving hydrogen‐bonding interactions

The miscibility and underlying hydrogen‐bonding interactions of blends of a fluorinated copolymer containing pyridine and a nonfluorinated copolymer containing methacrylic acid were studied with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), transmission Fourier transform infrared (TX‐FTIR) spectroscopy, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), whereas the surface properties of the blends were investigated with contact‐angle measurements, time‐of‐flight secondary‐ion mass spectroscopy, XPS, and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. DSC studies showed that the presence of a sufficient amount of 4‐vinylpyridine units in the fluorinated copolymer produced miscible blends with the nonfluorinated copolymer containing methacrylic acid. TX‐FTIR and XPS showed the existence of pyridine–acid interpolymer hydrogen‐bonding interactions. Even though the anchoring effect of hydrogen bonding hindered the migration of the fluorinated component to the blend surface, it could not completely eliminate the surface enrichment of the fluorinated component and the surface rearrangement of the fluorinated pendant chain. The air–blend interface was mainly occupied by the fluorinated pendant chain, and the surface energies of the blends were extremely low, even with only 1.5 wt % of the fluorinated component in the blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 1145–1154, 2004     

Ionic miscibility enhancement in poly(tetrafluoroethylene)/poly(ethyl acrylate) blends. I. Dynamic mechanical studies

It is shown that ion-ion interactions resulting from a proton transfer induce considerable miscibility in blends of functionalized poly(tetrafluoroethylene) with ethyl acrylate copolymers containing 4-vinyl pyridine. Dynamic mechanical measurements, in conjunction with transparency of the samples, are used to evaluate miscibility. It is shown that mixing conditions exert a profound effect on the properties of the final blend. The glass transition of the blend is shown to be strong function of the blend composition, as is characteristic of highly miscible systems.     

Synthesis of poly[(2‐oxo‐1,3‐dioxolane‐4‐yl) methyl methacrylate‐co‐ethyl acrylate] by incorporation of carbon dioxide into epoxide polymer and the miscibility behavior of its blends with poly(methyl methacrylate) or poly(vinyl chloride)

This study was related to the investigation of the chemical fixation of carbon dioxide to a copolymer bearing epoxide and the application of the cyclic carbonate group containing copolymer‐to‐polymer blends. In the synthesis of poly[(2‐oxo‐1,3‐dioxolane‐4‐yl) methyl methacrylate‐co‐ethyl acrylate] [poly(DOMA‐co‐EA)] from poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐co‐ethyl acrylate) [poly(GMA‐co‐EA)] and CO₂, quaternary ammonium salts showed good catalytic activity. The films of poly(DOMA‐co‐EA) with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends were cast from N,N′‐dimethylformamide solution. The miscibility of the blends of poly(DOMA‐co‐EA) with PMMA or PVC have been investigated both by DSC and visual inspection of the blends. The optical clarity test and DSC analysis showed that poly(DOMA‐co‐EA) containing blends were miscible over the whole composition range. The miscibility behaviors were discussed in terms of Fourier transform infrared spectra and interaction parameters based on the binary interaction model. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 39: 1472–1480, 2001     

Miscibility enhancement in polymers via ionic interactions: Dynamic mechanical and NMR studies

The presence of ionic interactions can be used to control the degree of miscibility of otherwise immiscible polymer systems. This control, in turn, allows one to prepare blends with a very wide range of “tailor-made” properties. Several examples are cited. In some of these, the interactions are based on proton transfer from a donor site on one polymer to an aceptor site on another leading to ion-ion interactions. In others, the transfer of a metal cation from an ionomer to a polar polymer, as a result of ion-dipole interactions, is involved. Systems studied to date include, among others, mixtures of polystyrene with poly(ethyl acrylate), polyisoprene, segmented poly urethanes, poly(ethyleneimine), and poly(ethylene oxide). The polyurethane blends with polystyrene are discussed in some detail, focussing especially on the mechanism of miscibility enhancement as determined by NMR. This technique has also been utilised to study the dynamics of the coil overlap process in solution as well as the proximity of the polymer coils to each other. Two particularly noteworthy applications involve mixtures of poly (tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) or of phenylated poly(phenylene oxide) with poly (ethyl acrylate), which are also discussed in some detail. Blends of this type may be of special interest in membrane applications.     

Ionic miscibility enhancement via microion elimination in sulfonated polystyrene/poly(ethyl-acrylate-co-4-vinyl pyridine) ionomer blends

Miscibility enhancement of ionomer/ionomer and ionomer/polymeric acid systems is studied on the polymer pairs of poly(styrene-co-tetramethyl ammonium styrenesulfonate)/poly(ethyl acrylate-co-N-methyl-4-vinylpyridinium iodide) and poly(styrene-co-styrenesulfonic acid)/poly(ethyl acrylate-co-N-methyl-4-vinylpyridinium iodide). NMR and dynamic mechanical results show that in these blends direct macroion–macroion interaction can be achieved with the elimination of microcounterions from the polymer chains. Ion-ion attraction leads to a miscibility enhancement comparable to that of the previously reported proton transfer blends; a miscible blend is obtained with ca. 5 mol% of ions in the polymers.     

Specific interactions and phase behavior of ternary poly(2‐vinylpyridine)/poly(N‐vinyl‐2‐pyrrolidone)/bisphenol A blends

Hydrogen‐bonding interactions between bisphenol A (BPA) and two proton‐accepting polymers, poly(2‐vinylpyridine) (P2VPy) and poly(N‐vinyl‐2‐pyrrolidone) (PVP), were examined by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The Flory–Huggins interaction‐energy densities of BPA/P2VPy and BPA/PVP blends were determined by the melting point depression method. The interaction parameters for both BPA/P2VPy and BPA/PVP blend systems were negative, demonstrating the miscibility of BPA with P2VPy as well as PVP. The miscibility of ternary BPA/P2VPy/PVP blends was examined by DSC, optical observation, and solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The experimental phase behavior of the ternary blend system agreed with the spinodal phase‐separation boundary calculated using the determined interaction‐energy densities. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 1125–1134, 2002     

Hydrogen bonding interactions,crystallization, and surface hydrophobicity in nanostructured epoxy/block copolymer blends

Hydrogen bonding interactions, phase behavior, crystallization, and surface hydrophobicity in nanostructured blend of bisphenol A‐type epoxy resin (ER), for example, diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) and poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐block‐poly(dimethyl siloxane)‐block‐poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL–PDMS–PCL) triblock copolymer were investigated by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, transmission electron microscopy, small‐angle X‐ray scattering, and contact angle measurements. The PCL–PDMS–PCL triblock copolymer consisted of two epoxy‐miscible PCL blocks and an epoxy‐immiscible PDMS block. The cured ER/PCL–PDMS–PCL blends showed composition‐dependent nanostructures from spherical and worm‐like microdomains to lamellar morphology. FTIR study revealed the existence of hydrogen bonding interactions between the PCL blocks and the cured epoxy, which was responsible for their miscibility. The overall crystallization rate of the PCL blocks in the blend decreased remarkably with increasing ER content, whereas the melting point was slightly depressed in the blends. The surface hydrophobicity of the cured ER increased upon addition of the block copolymer, whereas the surface free energy (γ_s) values decreased with increasing block copolymer concentration. The hydrophilicity of the epoxy could be reduced through blending with the PCL–PDMS–PCL block copolymer that contained a hydrophobic PDMS block. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 790–800, 2010     

Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(vinylpyrrolidone) acid–base polymer blends for direct methanol fuel cell application

Acid–base polymer blends for polymer electrolyte membranes have been prepared by blending sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) with poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) to reduce methanol uptake and to decrease methanol permeability while maintaining high proton conductivity. The acid‐base interaction occurring on the sulfonic acid group and on the tertiary amide group was characterized by FTIR and DMA. As the composition of PVP lowered than 20 wt % in the blends, the acid–base interaction causes great reduction on methanol uptake and the methanol permeability; however, the proton conductivity is still high. In this work, membrane–electrode assemblies (MEAs) have been prepared for direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) from both blend membrane and Nafion 117. DMFC single cell performance was also evaluated. Results confirmed that SPEEK (with the degree of sulfonation (DS) = 69%) blended with PVP (M_n = 1,300,000) with a ratio of 80/20 (w/w) exhibits higher open‐circuit voltages (OCV) and lower polarization loss than those of Nafion 117. These acid–base blends will be suitable for DMFC application. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 565–572, 2006     

Miscible blends of poly(ethylene oxide) with brush copolymers of poly(vinyl alcohol)‐graft‐poly(l‐lactide)

Even though poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) is immiscible with both poly(l ‐lactide) (PLLA) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), this article shows a working route to obtain miscible blends based on these polymers. The miscibility of these polymers has been analyzed using the solubility parameter approach to choose the proper ratios of the constituents of the blend. Then, PVA has been grafted with l ‐lactide (LLA) through ring‐opening polymerization to obtain a poly(vinyl alcohol)‐graft‐poly(l ‐lactide) (PVA‐g‐PLLA) brush copolymer with 82 mol % LLA according to ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies. PEO has been blended with the PVA‐g‐PLLA brush copolymer and the miscibility of the system has been analyzed by DSC, FTIR, OM, and SEM. The particular architecture of the blends results in DSC traces lacking clearly distinguishable glass transitions that have been explained considering self‐concentration effects (Lodge and McLeish) and the associated concentration fluctuations. Fortunately, the FTIR analysis is conclusive regarding the miscibility and the specific interactions in these systems. Melting point depression analysis suggests that interactions of intermediate strength and PLOM and SEM reveal homogeneous morphologies for the PEO/PVA‐g‐PLLA blends. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2016 , 54, 1217–1226     

Epoxy resin/poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) blends cured with 2,2‐bis[4‐(4‐aminophenoxy)phenyl]propane. II. Studies by Fourier transform infrared and carbon‐13 cross‐polarization/magic‐angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Crystalline thermosetting blends composed of 2,2′‐bis[4‐(4‐aminophenoxy)phenyl]propane‐crosslinked epoxy resin (ER) and poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) were investigated by means of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and high‐resolution solid‐state NMR spectroscopy. FTIR investigations indicated that there were specific intermolecular interactions between ER and PCL and that the intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions were weaker than the self‐association in pure epoxy. The intermolecular hydrogen bonding was considered to be the driving force for the miscibility of the thermosetting blends. For the examination of the miscibility of the thermosetting blends at the molecular level, high‐resolution solid‐state ¹³C cross‐polarity/magic‐angle spinning (CP‐MAS) NMR spectroscopy was employed. The line width of ¹³C CP‐MAS spectra decreased with increasing PCL contents, and the chemical shift of the carbonyl carbon resonance of PCL shifted to a low field with an increasing epoxy content in the blends. The proton spin–lattice relaxation experiments in the laboratory frame showed that all the blends possessed identical, composition‐dependent relaxation times (i.e., the proton spin–lattice relaxation times in the laboratory frame), suggesting that the thermosetting blends were homogeneous on the scale of 20–30 nm in terms of the spin‐diffusion mechanism, and this was in a good agreement with the results of differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical analysis. For the examination of the miscibility of the blends at the molecular level, the behavior of the proton lattice relaxation in the rotating frame was investigated. The homogeneity of the thermosetting blends at the molecular level was quite dependent on the blend composition. The PCL‐lean ER/PCL blends (e.g., 70/30) displayed a single homogeneous amorphous phase, and the molecular chains were intimately mixed on the segmental scale. The PCL‐rich blends displayed biexponential decay in experiments concerning the proton spin–lattice relaxation times in the rotating frame, which was ascribed to amorphous and crystalline phases. In the amorphous region, the molecular chains of epoxy and PCL were intimately mixed at the molecular level. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 1099–1111, 2003     

Evaluation of compatibility and properties of biodegradable polyester blends

Three different biodegradable polyesters, namely, polycaprolactone (PCL), polybutylene succinate (BIONOLLE), and a copolyester of adipic acid, terephthalic acid, and 1,4‐butanediol (EASTAR) were melt‐blended using a twin‐screw extruder. The percentage composition of each of the aforementioned polymers was varied to obtain different blends, and the mechanical properties were evaluated. Selected blends showed significant improvement in tensile strength as compared with the individual polymers used to prepare the blend. The compatibility between the polymer phases was examined via Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and nuclear magnetic resonace (NMR) spectroscopy as well as dynamic mechanical analysis. FTIR and NMR data confirmed the occurrence of hydrogen‐bonding and ester‐interchange reactions. Thermal properties and changes in crystallinity of the blends were examined with differential scanning calorimetry and X‐ray diffraction. A considerable increase in crystallinity was shown by the blend system containing BIONOLLE/PCL. The morphology of the blends was observed and correlated to the improved mechanical properties of the blend system. Results revealed an intermediate multiphase system in which a significant degree of mixing was achieved through the chemical interaction of the functional groups present, while using the twin‐screw extruder. Significant improvement in mechanical properties of some blends was observed, and information about the miscibility of these polyesters is provided. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 2003–2014, 2002     

Miscibility of poly(vinyl chloride) with poly(methyl-co-hexyl acrylate) and poly(methyl-co-2 ethyl hexyl acrylate)

The miscibility and phase behavior in blends of PVC with poly(methyl-co-hexyl acrylate)[MHA] and poly(methyl-co-2 ethyl hexyl acrylate)[MEH] were studied. It was found that PVC is miscible with MHA copolymers having a HA volume fraction from 0.30 to 0.92 and MEH copolymers having an EH volume fraction from 0.30 to 0.83 at 100°C. By applying the mean field theory to the phase diagrams of these blend systems, segmental interaction parameters which represent the binary interaction between different monomer units were estimated. The calculated values reflect the fact that the miscibility window observed for PVC/MHA and PVC/MEH blend systems was attributed to the effect of repulsion between different monomer units within the copolymer. To investigate the effect of specific interaction on the miscibility for these blend systems, an attempt was also made to describe the blend interaction parameter as a function of polar group concentration in the acrylate copolymer. The blend interaction parameter values exhibit a u-shaped curve as a function of the weight fraction of C?O group in the copolymer, and the lowest blend interaction parameter value appears at about 0.24 C?O weight fraction.     

Competitive specific interactions in miscible blends of poly(hydroxyether terephthalate ester) and poly(4‐vinyl pyridine)

The miscibility of poly(hydroxyether terephthalate ester) (PHETE) with poly(4‐vinyl pyridine) (P4VP) was established on the basis of thermal analysis. Differential scanning calorimetry showed that each blend displayed a single glass‐transition temperature (T_g), which is intermediate between those of the pure polymers and varies with the composition of blend. The T_g‐composition relationship can be well described with Kwei equation with k = 1 and q = ?30.8 (K), suggesting the presence of the intermolecular specific interactions in the blend system. To investigate the intermolecular specific interactions in the blends, the model compounds such as 1,3‐diphenoxy‐2‐propanol, 4‐methyl pyridine, and ethyl benzoate were used to determine the equilibrium constants, according to Coleman and Painter model, to account for the association equilibriums of several structural moieties, using liquid Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy. In terms of the difference in the association equilibrium constant, it is proposed that there are the competitive specific interactions in the blends, which were confirmed by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of the blends. It is observed that upon adding P4VP to the system, the ester carbonyls of PHETE that were H‐bonded with the hydroxyl groups were released because of the formation of the stronger interchain association via the hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyls of PHETE and tertiary nitrogen atoms of P4VP. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 1618–1626, 2006     

Influence of blend miscibility on the proton conductivity and methanol permeability of polymer electrolyte blends

The influence of miscibility on the transport properties of polymer electrolyte blends composed of a proton conductor and an insulator was investigated. The proton‐conductive component in the blends was sulfonated poly(ether ketone ketone) (SPEKK), while the nonconductive component was either poly(ether imide) (PEI) or poly(ether sulfone) (PES). The phase behavior of PEI‐SPEKK blends was strongly influenced by the sulfonation level of the SPEKK. At low sulfonation levels (ion‐exchange capacity (IEC) = 0.8 meq/g), the blends were miscible, while at a slightly higher level (IEC = 1.1 meq/g), they were only partially miscible and for IEC ≥ 1.4 meq/g they were effectively immiscible over the entire composition range. The PES‐SPEKK blends were miscible over the entire range of SPEKK IEC considered in this study (0.8–2.2 meq/g). At high IEC (2.2 meq/g) and at low mass fractions of SPEKK (<0.5), the miscible blends (PES‐SPEKK) had higher proton conductivities and methanol permeabilities than the immiscible ones (PEI‐SPEKK). The opposite relationship was observed for high mass fractions of SPEKK (>0.5). This behavior was explained by the differences in morphology between these two blend systems. At low IEC of SPEKK (0.8 meq/g), where both PEI‐SPEKK and PES‐SPEKK blend systems exhibited miscibility, the transport properties were not significantly different. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 2253–2266, 2006     

Miscibility and hydrogen‐bonding interactions in blends of carbon dioxide/epoxy propane copolymer with poly(p‐vinylphenol)

The miscibility and hydrogen‐bonding interactions of carbon dioxide and epoxy propane copolymer to poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC)/poly(p‐vinylphenol) (PVPh) blends were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The single glass‐transition temperature for each composition showed miscibility over the entire composition range. FTIR indicates the presence of strong hydrogen‐bonding interassociation between the hydroxyl groups of PVPh and the oxygen functional groups of PPC as a function of composition and temperature. XPS results testify to intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the oxygen atoms of carbon–oxygen single bonds and carbon–oxygen double bonds in carbonate groups of PPC and the hydroxyl groups of PVPh by the shift of C_1s peaks and the evolution of three novel O_1s peaks in the blends, which supports the suggestion from FTIR analyses. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 1957–1964, 2002     

Investigating polymer blend miscibility with forward recoil spectrometry

We tested forward recoil spectrometry (FRES) as a method to determine miscibility by measuring coexistence compositions in binary polymer blends. In this study, equilibrium phase compositions were determined for a compositionally symmetric poly(styrene‐ran‐methyl methacrylate) random copolymer (S_0.49‐r‐MMA) and two homopolymers, deuterated polystyrene (dPS) and deuterated poly(methyl methacrylate) (dPMMA). Sample preparation, film dewetting, and beam damage were addressed, and the results for these polymer blends were in good agreement with those obtained through other experimental techniques. Deuteration had a strong effect on the miscibility of the dPS/S_0.49‐r‐MMA and dPMMA/S_0.49‐r‐MMA blends, to the extent that the asymmetric miscibility observed separately for the PS/S_0.49‐r‐MMA and PMMA/S_0.49‐r‐MMA blends was not found. Although this deuteration effect may limit the applicability of FRES for some polymer systems, the accuracy with which phase compositions can be determined with FRES makes it an attractive alternative to other less quantitative methods for investigating blend miscibility. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 1547–1552, 2000     

Rheological and thermal study of delayed crystallization in poly(butylene terephthalate)/ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate blends

The effects of the composition and resulting morphology on the crystallization and rheology of blends containing poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and an ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate (EEA) copolymer, two immiscible polymers, were studied over the entire range of volume fractions. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms recorded during cooling showed important differences, mainly in terms of the PBT crystallization temperatures, depending on the blend composition. In addition to the classical crystallization peaks of PBT and EEA, a third crystallization peak appeared for blends containing less than 60% PBT. This peak was attributed to a delayed crystallization of PBT. This phenomenon was examined in terms of homogeneous crystallization. Linear viscoelastic measurements allowed the delayed crystallization behavior in these polymer blends to be displayed. Indeed, the variation of the storage modulus with the temperature showed increasing steps during cooling. These sudden increases appeared at temperatures very close to those at which the crystallization peaks were observed in the DSC experiments. This behavior was verified for different blend compositions. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 714–721, 2004     

An intimate polycarbonate/poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl acetate) ternary blend via coalescence from their common inclusion compound with γ‐cyclodextrin

In this study, we successfully report an intimate ternary blend system of polycarbonate (PC)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) obtained by the simultaneous coalescence of the three guest polymers from their common γ‐cyclodextrin (γ‐CD) inclusion compound (IC). The thermal transitions and the homogeneity of the coalesced ternary blend were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The observation of a single, common glass transition strongly suggests the presence of a homogeneous amorphous phase in the coalesced ternary polymer blend. This was further substantiated by solid‐state ¹³C NMR observation of the T_1ρ(¹H)s for each of the blend components. For comparison, ternary blends of PC/PMMA/PVAc were also prepared by traditional coprecipitation and solution casting methods. TGA data showed a thermal stability for the coalesced ternary blend that was improved over the coprecipitated blend, which was phase‐segregated. The presence of possible interactions between the three polymer components was investigated by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The analysis indicates that the ternary blend of these polymers achieved by coalescence from their common γ‐CD–IC results in a homogeneous polymer blend, possibly with improved properties, whereas coprecipitation and solution cast methods produced phase separated polymer blends. It was also found that control of the component polymer molar ratios plays a key role in the miscibility of their coalesced ternary blends. Coalescence of two or more normally immiscible polymers from their common CD–ICs appears to be a general method for obtaining well‐mixed, intimate blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 4182–4194, 2004     

Ionomeric blends. V. FTIR studies of ionic interactions in polyurethane-styrene blends

FTIR spectra of blends of lightly sulfonated polystyrene (PS-SSA) with polyurethanes (PU) containing a tertiary nitrogen in the chain extender were recorded. These blends exhibit a two-phase behavior, but the individual components are not phase separated. Earlier dynamic mechanical studies suggested the occurrence of proton transfer from the sulfonic acid to the tertiary nitrogen, which enhanced the miscibility via ionic interactions and resulted in the formation of a miscible blend between the PS-SSA and the hard segment of the PU, the soft segment being excluded. FTIR studies of these blends now confirm the proton transfer mechanism. A new absorption band at 3428 cm^?1 corresponds to a stretching vibration of an N⁺?H bond. The 1012 cm^?1 band of the SO₃H group, which strongly depends on the degree of protonation, shifts to lower frequency. The symmetric stretching vibration of the SO group, which occurred at 1043 cm^?1, shifts to lower frequency as well, suggesting a lower polarization of the S? O dipole due to the removal of H⁺.     

Miscibility of poly(butyl methacrylate-CO-methacrylic acid) or poly(styrene-CO-methacrylic acid) with poly(styrene-CO-4-vinylpyridine) or poly(butyl methacrylate-CO-4-vinylpyridine)

The miscibility of blends of copolymers of different compositions of butyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid or styrene-co-methacrylic acid with styrene-co-4-vinylpyridine or butyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. It was found that these blends were miscible in part as a result of specific favorable interactions between the carboxylic acid and pyridine groups within the polymer chains. Evidence of such interactions was obtained from the single composition-dependent glass transition temperature and the FTIR results.