The six‐membered‐ring azomethine N‐((E)‐{5‐[(E)‐(pyridin‐3‐ylimino)methyl]thiophen‐2‐yl}methylidene)pyridin‐3‐amine

The title compound, C₁₆H₁₂N₄S, forms a three‐dimensional layered network structure via intermolecular hydrogen bonding and π‐stacking. The azomethine molecule adopts the thermodynamically stable E regioisomer and the pyridine substituents are antiperiplanar. The mean planes of the pyridine rings and the azomethine group to which they are connected are twisted by 27.27 (5) and 33.60 (5)°. The electrochemical energy gap of 2.3 eV based on the HOMO–LUMO energy difference is in agreement with the spectroscopically derived value.     

Polymorphism of methyl 4‐amino‐3‐phenylisothiazole‐5‐carboxylate: an experimental and theoretical study

Being a close analogue of amflutizole, methyl 4‐amino‐3‐phenylisothiazole‐5‐carboxylate (C₁₁H₁₀N₂O₂S) was assumed to be capable of forming polymorphic structures. Noncentrosymmetric and centrosymmetric polymorphs have been obtained by crystallization from a series of more volatile solvents and from denser tetrachloromethane, respectively. Identical conformations of the molecule are found in both structures. The two polymorphs differ mainly in the intermolecular interactions formed by the amino group and in the type of stacking interactions between the π‐systems. The most effective method for revealing packing motifs in structures with intermolecular interactions of different types (hydrogen bonding, stacking, dispersion, etc.) is to study the pairwise interaction energies using quantum chemical calculations. Molecules form a column as the primary basic structural motif due to stacking interactions in both polymorphic structures under study. The character of a column (straight or zigzag) is determined by the orientations of the stacked molecules (in a `head‐to‐head' or `head‐to‐tail' manner). Columns bound by intermolecular N—H…O and N—H…N hydrogen bonds form a double column as the main structural motif in the noncentrosymmetric structure. Double columns in the noncentrosymmetric structure and columns in the centrosymmetric structure interact strongly within the ab crystallographic plane, forming a layer as a secondary basic structural motif. The noncentrosymmetric structure has a lower density and a lower (by 0.59 kJ mol^?1) lattice energy, calculated using periodic calculations, compared to the centrosymmetric structure.     

β‐Lapachone

The most remarkable aspect of the crystal structure of the title compound (systematic name: 3,4‐dihydro‐2,2‐dimethyl‐2H‐naphtho[1,2‐b]pyran‐5,6‐dione), C₁₅H₁₄O₃, is that a π‐stacking inter­action is present between the two naphthalene ring systems of symmetry‐related mol­ecules. Apart from these π–π inter­actions, different mol­ecules are held together by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen‐bonding inter­actions.     

Supramolecular networks of 10‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)acridin‐9(10H)‐one and 10‐(2‐chloroethyl)acridin‐9(10H)‐one

Both 10‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)acridin‐9(10H)‐one, C₁₅H₁₃NO₂, and 10‐(2‐chloroethyl)acridin‐9(10H)‐one, C₁₅H₁₂ClNO, have monoclinic (P2₁/c) symmetry and supramolecular three‐dimensional networks. But the differences in the intermolecular interactions displayed by the hydroxy group and the chlorine substituent lead to stronger intermolecular π‐stacking interactions and hydrogen bonding, and hence a significantly higher melting point for the former.     

N‐(2‐Bromoethyl)‐4‐piperidino‐1,8‐naphthalimide and N‐(3‐bromopropyl)‐4‐piperidino‐1,8‐naphthalimide

N‐(2‐Bromoethyl)‐4‐piperidino‐1,8‐naphthalimide, C₁₉H₁₉BrN₂O₂, (I), and N‐(3‐bromopropyl)‐4‐piperidino‐1,8‐naphthalimide, C₂₀H₂₁BrN₂O₂, (II), are an homologous pair of 1,8‐naphthalimide derivatives. The naphthalimide units are planar and each piperidine substituent adopts a chair conformation. This study emphasizes the importance of π‐stacking interactions, often augmented by other contacts, in determining the crystal structures of 1,8‐naphthalimide derivatives.     

1,2,3‐Trimethoxy‐5,11‐dihydro­indolo[1,2‐b]isoquinoline‐5,11‐dione

The title compound, C₁₅H₁₉NO₅, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with four mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, which differ from each other in the orientation of their methoxy groups. Of the three methoxy groups in each molecule, one lies close to the plane of the mol­ecule and the other two have an out‐of‐plane conformation where they point in opposite directions. In the crystal structure, four different types of π‐stacks are observed and the mol­ecules pack in two different types of stacking sheets, with alternating mol­ecules A and B in one ribbon and alternating mol­ecules C and D in the other. The supramolecular structure is supported by C—H⋯O and π–π inter­actions.     

2‐Amino‐5‐iodopyridinium bromide hemihydrate and 2‐amino‐5‐iodopyridinium chloride monohydrate

The hydrobromide and hydrochloride salts of 2‐amino‐5‐iodopyridine were prepared from aqueous solutions. The hydrobromide salt, C₅H₆IN₂⁺·Br⁻·0.5H₂O, crystallizes as a hemihydrate, and exhibits hydrogen bonding and π‐stacking which stabilize the crystal structure. The hydrochloride salt, C₅H₆IN₂⁺·Cl⁻·H₂O·0.375HCl, crystallized as the hydrate and exhibits similar hydrogen bonding and π‐stacking in the lattice. The most interesting feature of the hydrochloride salt is the presence of an additional fractional HCl molecule which introduces disorder in the location of the water molecule. The additional proton from the fractional HCl molecule is accounted for by the presence of a partial hydronium ion on one of the water sites.     

Three polymorphs of 3‐(3‐phenyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐yl)‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐2‐one formed from different solvents

The polymorphic study of 3‐(3‐phenyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐yl)‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐2‐one, C₁₇H₁₁N₃O₂, was performed due to its potential biological activity and revealed three polymorphic modifications in the triclinic space group P, the monoclinic space group P2₁ and the orthorhombic space group Pbca. These polymorphs have a one‐column layered type of crystal organization. The strongest interactions between the molecules of the studied structures is stacking between π‐systems, while N—H…N and C—H…O hydrogen bonds link stacked columns forming layers as a secondary basic structural motif. C—H…π hydrogen bonds were observed between neighbouring layers and their role is the least significant in the formation of the crystal structure. Packing differences between the polymorphic modifications are minor and can be identified only using an analysis based on a comparison of the pairwise interaction energies.     

Unconventional hydrogen bonding and π‐stacking in two substituted pyridine carboxamides

The crystal structures of two para‐substituted aryl derivatives of pyridine‐2‐carboxamide, namely N‐(4‐fluorophenyl)pyridine‐2‐carboxamide, C₁₂H₉FN₂O, (I), and N‐(4‐nitrophenyl)pyridine‐2‐carboxamide, C₁₂H₉N₃O₃, (II), have been studied. Compound (I) exhibits unconventional aryl–carbonyl C—H...O and pyridine–fluorine C—H...F hydrogen bonding in two dimensions and well defined π‐stacking involving pyridine rings in the third dimension. The conformation of (II) is more nearly planar than that of (I) and the intermolecular interactions comprise one‐dimensional aryl–carbonyl C—H...O hydrogen bonds leading to a stepped or staircase‐like progression of loosely π‐stacked molecules. The close‐packed layers of planar π‐stacked molecules are related by inversion symmetry. Two alternating interplanar separations of 3.439 (1) and 3.476 (1) Å are observed in the crystal lattice and are consistent with a repetitive packing sequence, ABA′B′AB…, for the π‐stacked inversion pairs of (II).     

Solvated and solvent‐free forms of N,N′‐di­thio­diphthal­imide

N,N′‐Di­thio­diphthal­imide, C₁₆H₈N₂O₄S₂, crystallizes from ethyl acetate with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, in which the N—S—S—N torsion angles are ?83.59 (19) and 92.9 (2)°. The mol­ecules are linked by C—H?O hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions into a three‐dimensional framework. When crystallized from either di­chloro­methane or ethanol, solvates are formed in which the mol­ecules of the title compound lie across twofold rotation axes in space group C2/c, with N—S—S—N torsion angles of 93.54 (7) and 96.14 (11)°. There are no hydrogen bonds in these solvates, but the mol­ecules are linked by aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions into chains, between which there are continuous channels. Disordered solvent mol­ecules occupy these channels, which account for ca 20% of the unit‐cell volume.     

Three 4,7‐diaryl‐2‐ethylsulfanylpyrazolo[1,5‐a][1,3,5]triazines

The molecular dimensions of 2‐ethylsulfanyl‐7‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐4‐phenylpyrazolo[1,5‐a][1,3,5]triazine, C₂₀H₁₈N₄S, (I), 7‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐2‐ethylsulfanyl‐4‐phenylpyrazolo[1,5‐a][1,3,5]triazine, C₁₉H₁₅ClN₄S, (II), and 4,7‐bis(4‐chlorophenyl)‐2‐(ethylsulfanyl)pyrazolo[1,5‐a][1,3,5]triazine, C₁₉H₁₄Cl₂N₄S, (III), show evidence for some aromatic delocalization in the pyrazole rings. The conformations adopted by the ethylsulfanyl substituents are different in all three compounds. There are no hydrogen bonds in any of the crystal structures, but pairs of molecules in (II) and (III) are linked into centrosymmetric dimers by π‐stacking interactions.     

4‐Chloro‐1‐naphthol

Molecules of the title compound, C₁₀H₇ClO, (I), are connected by a single strong O—H...O hydrogen bond into a simple C(2) chain, which runs parallel to the c axis and is additionally stabilized by intermolecular π–π stacking interactions. The significance of this study lies in the comparison drawn between the crystal structure of (I) and those of several of its simple analogues. This comparison shows a close similarity in the packing of the molecules that form π‐stacks along the shortest crystallographic axes. A substantial spatial overlap is observed between adjacent molecules in such a π‐stack, depending mainly on the kind of substituent.     

Synthesis and photophysical properties of 2,5,8,11‐tetrakis(5‐hexylthiophen‐2‐yl)tetrathieno[2,3‐a:3′,2′‐c:2′′,3′′‐f:3′′′,2′′′‐h]naphthalene

The title compound, C₅₈H₆₄S₈, has been prepared by Pd‐catalysed direct C—H arylation of tetrathienonaphthalene (TTN) with 5‐hexyl‐2‐iodothiophene and recrystallized by slow evaporation from dichloromethane. The crystal structure shows a completely planar geometry of the TTN core, crystallizing in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. The structure consists of slipped π‐stacks and the interfacial distance between the mean planes of the TTN cores is 3.456 (5) Å, which is slightly larger than that of the comparable derivative of tetrathienoanthracene (TTA) with 2‐hexylthiophene groups. The packing in the two structures is greatly influenced by both the aromatic core of the structure and the alkyl side chains.     

3‐Butyl‐1‐(5‐nitro­benzo­[c][1,2]­thia­zol‐3‐yl)‐3‐phenyl­triazene

The mol­ecule of the title compound, C₁₇H₁₇N₅O₂S, consists of three π systems, viz. two aromatic rings and the triazene moiety, which are mutually deconjugated although coplanar. The n‐butyl chain is roughly perpendicular to the molecular plane, with the terminal methyl­ene and methyl groups disordered between two equally populated positions. The mol­ecules in the crystal associate in an antiparallel fashion, forming dimers across the centre of symmetry, the principal intradimer interaction being stacking of the π‐electron portions of the mol­ecules.     

Pyrene‐Bridged Boron Subphthalocyanine Dimers: Combination of Planar and Bowl‐Shaped π‐Conjugated Systems for Creating Uniquely Curved π‐Conjugated Systems

Pyrene‐bridged boron subphthalocyanine dimers were synthesized from a mixed‐condensation reaction of 2,7‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4,5,9,10‐tetracyanopyrene and tetrafluorophthalonitrile, and their syn and anti isomers arising from the result of connecting two bowl‐shaped boron subphthalocyanine molecules were successfully separated. Expansion of the conjugated system of boron subphthalocyanine through a pyrene bridge caused a redshift of the Q band absorption relative to the parent pyrene‐fused monomer, whereas combining the curved π‐conjugation of boron subphthalocyanine with the planar π‐conjugation of pyrene enabled facile embracement of C₆₀ molecules, owing to the enhanced concave–convex π–π stacking interactions.     

cis‐Dichloridobis(1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐diol‐κ2N,N′)manganese(II): a supramolecular chain formed via O—H...Cl bonds and aromatic stacking

The title compound, [MnCl₂(C₁₂H₈N₂O₂)₂], displays a novel supramolecular chain formed by intermolecular O—H...Cl hydrogen bonds and aromatic stacking. The molecule has crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry with the Mn^II atom on the twofold axis. In the 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐diol ligand, each H atom of the two hydroxy groups is oriented towards the other hydroxy O atom. Both hydroxy groups form intermolecular O—H...Cl hydrogen bonds with a single Cl atom of an adjacent molecule. These hydrogen bonds connect the molecules via operation of the molecular twofold axis and the centre of inversion of the crystal lattice, forming a doubly‐bridged one‐dimensional structure with Mn atoms as the nodes. Strong aromatic π‐stacking between two antiparallel neighbouring 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐diol ligands also helps to stabilize the chain.     

Tris[2‐(1,3‐thiazol‐2‐yl‐κN)‐1H‐benzimidazole‐κN3]zinc(II) dinitrate ethanol hemisolvate monohydrate at 100 K

The Zn^II center in the dicationic complex of the title compound, [Zn(C₁₀H₇N₃S)₃](NO₃)₂·0.5C₂H₅OH·H₂O, is in a distorted octahedral environment with imperfect noncrystallographic C₃ symmetry. Each 2‐(1,3‐thiazol‐2‐yl)‐1H‐benzimidazole ligand coordinates in a bidentate manner, with the Zn—N(imidazole) bond lengths approximately 0.14 Å shorter than the Zn—N(thiazole) bond lengths. Charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds connect cations, anions and water molecules. A lattice void is occupied by an ethanol solvent molecule disordered about a crystallographic inversion center and π‐stacking is observed between one type of symmetry‐related benzene rings.     

4H‐cyclopenta[2,1‐b:3,4‐b′]dithiophen‐4‐one (CPDTO) homopolymer with side chains on every other CPDTO

A soluble 4H‐cyclopenta[2,1‐b ;3,4‐b ′]dithiophene‐4‐one (CPDTO)‐based polymer (C₆‐PCPDTO) has been synthesized from two monomers derived from nonalkylated CPDTO and didodecyl CPDTO (C₁₂‐CPDTO). Proton NMR, thermal analysis, UV–vis absorption, cyclic voltammetry, and XRD are used to characterize the polymer in solution and film. The new polymer has an optical bandgap of 1.28 eV in film, and has strong interchain interaction in chloroform solutions. The polymer contains a significant amount of homocoupled segments. The regular segments and homocoupled CPDTO segments render the polymer highly aggregating in solution. The non‐planar homocoupled C₁₂‐CPDTO segments prevent the polymer from forming regular π‐stacks, resulting in a low SCLC hole mobility (3.88 × 10^?7 cm²V^?1s^?1). CV experiments show that C₆‐PCPDTO is stable in its oxidized and reduced states. Solar cell devices were fabricated from C₆‐PCPDTO2 :PC₆₀BM blends of different weight ratios. High PC₆₀BM loading (80% or greater) was required for the devices to show measurable efficiency, indicating that the limited π‐stacking of the polymer is not sufficient to cause effective phase separation. Further development of synthetic method is still needed to eliminate structural defects so that long‐range ordered pi‐stacking can be realized in the polymer for these applications. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55 , 1077–1085     

Alternated π‐conjugated polymers based on a 1,2‐diiminocyclohexane chiral unit for nitroaromatics sensing

The detection of 2,4‐dinitrotoluene (DNT) by fluorescence quenching of a new class of polyimines consisting in π‐conjugated segments regularly alternated with chiral C₂ symmetry units has been studied for solutions and thin films. Their photophysical properties and their sensitivity towards DNT detection has been compared to those of a small model molecule incorporating the same π‐conjugated segment. In solution, all the compounds exhibit the same photo‐physical properties and sensitivity towards DNT detection. In contrast, for thin films, better performances are observed in static conditions for this new class of polyimines compared to the small model molecule. It seems that C₂ symmetry units prevent from the stacking of the π‐conjugated segments and provide in addition to high fluorescence signal an improved diffusion of the analyte inside the films. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 4141–4149, 2009     

Hydrogen bonding and fluorous weak interactions in the non‐isomorphous {4,4′‐bis[(2,2,3,3‐tetrafluoropropoxy)methyl]‐2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ2N,N′}dibromidopalladium and ‐platinum complexes

The polyfluorinated title compounds, [MBr₂(C₁₈H₁₆F₈N₂O₂)] or [4,4′‐(HCF₂CF₂CH₂OCH₂)₂‐2,2′‐bpy]MBr₂, ( 1 ) (M = Pd and bpy is bipyridine) and ( 2 ) (M = Pt), have –CH_(α)2OCH_(β)2CF₂CF₂H side chains with methylene H‐atom donors at the α and β sites, and methine H‐atom donors at the terminal sites, in addition to aromatic H‐atom donors. In contrast to the original expectation of isomorphous structures, ( 1 ) crystallizes in the space group C2/c and ( 2 ) in P2₁/n, with similar unit‐cell volumes and Z = 4. The asymmetric unit of ( 1 ) is one half of the molecule, which resides on a crystallographic twofold axis. Both ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) display stacking of the molecules, indicating a planar (bpy)MBr₂ skeleton in each case. The structure of ( 1 ) exhibits columns with C—H_(β)…Br hydrogen bonds between consecutive layers which conforms to a static (β,β) linkage between layers. In the molecular plane, ( 1 ) shows double C—H_(α)…Br hydrogen bonds self‐repeating along the b axis, the planar molecules being connected into infinite belts. Compound ( 2 ) has no crystallographic symmetry and forms π‐dimer pairs as supermolecules, which then stack parallel to the a axis. The π‐dimer‐pair supermolecules exhibit (Pt—)Br…Br(—Pt) contacts [3.6937 (7) Å] to neighbouring π‐dimer pairs crosslinking the columns. The structure of ( 2 ) reveals many C—H…F(—C) interactions between F atoms and aromatic C—H groups, in addition to those between F atoms and methylene C—H groups.