(Azido‐κN)bis­(di‐2‐pyridylamine)­copper(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate and (azido‐κN)bis­(di‐2‐pyridylamine)­copper(II) chloride tetra­hydrate

The two new title complexes, [Cu(N₃)(dpyam)₂]PF₆ (dpyam is di‐2‐pyridylamine, C₁₀H₁₁N₃), (I), and [Cu(N₃)(dpyam)₂]Cl·4H₂O, (II), respectively, have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Both complexes display a distorted square‐pyramidal geometry. Each Cu atom is coordinated in the basal plane by three dpyam N atoms and one azide N atom in equatorial positions, and by another N atom from the dpyam group in the apical position. In complex (I), the one‐dimensional supra­molecular architecture is assembled via hydrogen‐bonding inter­actions between the amine N atom and terminal azide N atoms and the F atoms of the PF₆⁻ anion. For complex (II), hydrogen‐bonding inter­actions between the amine N atom, the Cl⁻ anion and water O atoms result in a two‐dimensional lattice.     

The trans influence of the pyridine ligand on ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complexes

In the two ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complexes ­(di­benzoyl­carbenyl‐κC)(pyridine‐κN)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)­ruthenium(II), [Ru(C₁₅H₁₀O₂)(C₅H₅N)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)], (I), and (pyridine‐κN)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)[bis(3‐tri­fluoro­methyl­phenyl)­carbenyl‐κC]­ruthenium(II), [Ru(C₁₅H₈F₆)(C₅H₅N)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)], (II), the pyridine ligand coordinates to the octahedral Ru atom trans with respect to the carbene ligand. The C(carbene)—Ru—N(pyridine) bonds in (I) coincide with a crystallographic twofold axis. The Ru—C bond lengths of 1.877 (8) and 1.868 (3) Å in (I) and (II), respectively, are slightly longer than those of other ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complexes, owing to the trans influence of the pyridine ligands.     

Mercury(II) thiolate complexes of two flexible benzimidazole‐based ligands

The structure of catena‐poly[[{bis[4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate‐κS]mercury(II)}‐μ‐1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis(1H‐benzimidazole)‐κ²N³:N^3′] bis(hexafluoridophosphate) 0.25‐hydrate], {[Hg(C₁₆H₁₄N₄)(C₉H₁₃NS)₂](PF₆)₂·0.25H₂O}_n, contains a one‐dimensional zigzag chain. The Hg^II cation is coordinated by two S atoms of two 4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate (Tab) ligands and by two N atoms from two different 1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis(1H‐benzimidazole) ligands, forming a distorted seesaw‐shaped coordination geometry. The F atoms of the hexafluoridophosphate anion interact with the H atoms of the Tab ligand, generating a two‐dimensional network. Furthermore, this layer is connected to neighbouring layers via H...π interactions, thereby forming a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structure. In catena‐poly[[{[4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate‐κS]mercury(II)}bis[μ‐4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate‐κ²S:S]{[4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate‐κS]mercury(II)}‐μ‐1,1′‐(hexane‐1,6‐diyl)bis(1H‐benzimidazole)‐κ²N³:N^3′] tetrakis(hexafluoridophosphate)], {[Hg₂(C₂₀H₂₂N₄)(C₉H₁₃NS)₄](PF₆)₄}_n, each Hg^II cation is coordinated by two S atoms of two Tab ligands and one N atom of the 1,1′‐(hexane‐1,6‐diyl)bis(1H‐benzimidazole) (hbbm) ligand, forming a distorted T‐shaped coordination geometry, while longer secondary Hg...S bonds join two such units across a centre of inversion to give the tetravalent cation. Adjacent {[Hg(Tab)₂]₂(μ‐hbbm)}⁴⁺ cations are linked through the centrosymmetric hbbm ligands to afford a one‐dimensional chain extending along the b axis. Several F atoms interact with the H atoms of the Tab and hbbm ligands, while the S atom interacts with an aromatic H atom of a different Tab ligand, to afford a complex intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding arrangement in a three‐dimensional structure.     

One‐dimensional copper(II) coordination polymers based on 1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane and diimine ligands

Two one‐dimensional (1D) coordination polymers (CPs), namely catena‐poly[[[aqua(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ²N,N′)(nitrato‐κO)copper(II)]‐μ‐1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane‐κ²N:N′] nitrate], {[Cu(NO₃)(C₁₀H₈N₂)(C₁₃H₁₄N₂)(H₂O)]·NO₃}_n ( 1 ), and catena‐poly[[[aqua(nitrato‐κO)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)copper(II)]‐μ‐1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane‐κ²N:N′] nitrate], {[Cu(NO₃)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(C₁₃H₁₄N₂)(H₂O)]·NO₃}_n ( 2 ), have been synthesized using [Cu(NO₃)(NN)(H₂O)₂]NO₃, where NN = 2,2′‐bipyridine (bpy) or 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen), as a linker in a 1:1 molar ratio. The CPs were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray structure determination. The 1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane (dpp) ligand acts as a bridging ligand, leading to the formation of a 1D polymer. The octahedral coordination sphere around copper consists of two N atoms from bpy for 1 or phen for 2 , two N atoms from dpp, one O atom from water and one O atom from a coordinated nitrate anion. Each structure contains two crystallographically independent chains in the asymmetric unit and the chains are linked via hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network.     

A supramolecular zigzag chain of organometallic dipoles mediated by PF6− anions

The title compound, (η⁵‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)(4‐nitro­benzo­nitrile‐κN)(trimethyl­phosphine‐κP)(triphenyl­phosphite‐κP)iron(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₇H₄N₂O₂)(C₁₈H₁₅O₃P)(C₃H₉P)]PF₆, has been characterized by spectroscopic and X‐ray diffraction in order to evaluate the tuning of the electron density at the metal centre and the extension of the π delocalization on the mol­ecule due to the presence of phosphite and phosphine co‐ligands. The compound crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c, which destroys the possibility of exhibiting any quadratic non‐linear optical properties. The packing shows a supramolecular zigzag chain of antiparallel cations connected via the PF₆⁻ anions through C—H⋯F^δ− inter­actions, with H⋯F distances ranging from 2.39 to 2.67 Å. Each zigzag chain is composed of isomeric organometallic fragments containing either R or S mol­ecules. These chains are connected through weak inter­molecular C—H⋯C inter­actions, forming a two‐dimensional plane parallel to (101).     

A new heteroleptic cuprous complex with strong yellow photoluminescence

In the title heteroleptic cuprous complex, (acetonitrile‐κN)({2‐[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)phenoxy]phenyl}diphenylphosphane‐κ²P,P′)[2‐(pyridin‐4‐yl‐κN)‐1,3‐benzoxazole]copper(I) hexafluoridophosphate, [Cu(C₃₆H₂₈OP₂)(CH₃CN)(C₁₂H₈N₂O)]PF₆, conventionally abbreviated [Cu(POP)(CH₃CN)(4‐PBO)]PF₆, where POP is the diphosphane ligand {2‐[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)phenoxy]phenyl}diphenylphosphane and 4‐PBO is the N‐containing ligand 2‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3‐benzoxazole, the asymmetric unit consists of a hexafluoridophosphate anion and a whole mononuclear cation, where the Cu^I centre is coordinated by two P atoms from the POP ligand, by one N atom from the 4‐PBO ligand and by the N atom of the coordinated acetonitrile molecule, giving rise to a CuP₂N₂ distorted tetrahedral coordination geometry. The electronic absorption, photoluminescence and thermal stability properties of this complex have been studied on as‐synthesized samples, which had previously been examined by powder X‐ray diffraction. A yellow emission signal is attributed to an excited state arising from metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MLCT).     

Acetate and acetamide complexes of [Ni(Me4[12]aneN4)]PF6: a tale of two ligands

Although there are many examples of acetate complexes, acetamide complexes are virtually unknown. A side‐by‐side comparison in (acetato‐κ²O,O′)(1,4,7,10‐tetramethyl‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐κ⁴N)nickel(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Ni(C₂H₃O₂)(C₁₂H₂₈N₄)]PF₆, (1), and (acetamidato‐κ²O,O′)(1,4,7,10‐tetramethyl‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐κ⁴N)nickel(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Ni(C₂H₄NO)(C₁₂H₂₈N₄)]PF₆, (2), shows the steric equivalence between these two ligands, suggesting that acetamide could be considered as a viable acetate replacement for electronic tuning.     

Structure and magnetic properties of a copper(II) coordination polymer based on azide,pyridine and homophthalic acid

The azide anion is a short bridging ligand that has been used extensively to construct magnetic coordination polymers, and fundamental magneto‐structural correlations have been substantiated by theoretical calculations. The copper(II) coordination polymer poly[bis(μ‐azido‐κ²N¹:N¹)(μ₄‐homophthalato‐κ⁴O:O′:O′′:O′′′)bis(pyridine‐κN)dicopper(II)], [Cu₂(C₉H₆O₄)(N₃)₂(C₅H₅N)₂]_n, was synthesized from homophthalic acid (2‐carboxyphenylacetic acid), pyridine and azide (N₃⁻) by a hydrothermal reaction. Single‐crystal structure analysis indicated that it features a one‐dimensional chain structure which is comprised of (μ_1,1‐N₃⁻)(μ‐syn–syn‐COO⁻)₂‐ and (μ_1,1‐N₃⁻)₂‐bridged tetranuclear Cu^II units. Magnetic measurements revealed that the compound exhibits dominant antiferromagnetic behaviour.     

The crystal and molecular structures of three copper‐containing complexes and their activities in mimicking galactose oxidase

The structures of three copper‐containing complexes, namely (benzoato‐κ²O,O′)[(E)‐2‐({[2‐(diethylamino)ethyl]imino}methyl)phenolato‐κ³N,N′,O]copper(II) dihydrate, [Cu(C₇H₅O₂)(C₁₃H₁₉N₂O)]·2H₂O, 1 , [(E)‐2‐({[2‐(diethylamino)ethyl]imino}methyl)phenolato‐κ³N,N′,O](2‐phenylacetato‐κ²O,O′)copper(II), [Cu(C₈H₇O₂)(C₁₃H₁₉N₂O)], 2 , and bis[μ‐(E)‐2‐({[3‐(diethylamino)propyl]imino}methyl)phenolato]‐κ⁴N,N′,O:O;κ⁴O:N,N′,O‐(μ‐2‐methylbenzoato‐κ²O:O′)copper(II) perchlorate, [Cu₂(C₈H₇O₂)(C₁₂H₁₇N₂O)₂]ClO₄, 3 , have been reported and all have been tested for their activity in the oxidation of d ‐galactose. The results suggest that, unlike the enzyme galactose oxidase, due to the precipitation of Cu₂O, this reaction is not catalytic as would have been expected. The structures of 1 and 2 are monomeric, while 3 consists of a dimeric cation and a perchlorate anion [which is disordered over two orientations, with occupancies of 0.64 (4) and 0.36 (4)]. In all three structures, the central Cu atom is five‐coordinated in a distorted square‐pyramidal arrangment (τ parameter of 0.0932 for 1 , 0.0888 for 2 , and 0.142 and 0.248 for the two Cu centers in 3 ). In each species, the environment about the Cu atom is such that the vacant sixth position is open, with very little steric crowding.     

Homo‐ and Heterodinuclear Ir and Rh Imine‐functionalized Protic NHC Complexes: Synthetic,Structural Studies,and Tautomerization/Metallotropism Insights

The influence of the potentially chelating imino group of imine‐functionalized Ir and Rh imidazole complexes on the formation of functionalized protic N‐heterocyclic carbene (pNHC) complexes by tautomerization/metallotropism sequences was investigated. Chloride abstraction in [Ir(cod)Cl{C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}] ( 1 a ) (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene, Dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) with TlPF₆ gave [Ir(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^?). Plausible mechanisms for the tautomerization of complex 1 a to 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^? involving C2?H bond activation either in 1 a or in [Ir(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}₂]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 6 a ⁺[PF₆]^?) were postulated. Addition of PR₃ to complex 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^? afforded the eighteen‐valence‐electron complexes [Ir(cod)(PR₃){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 7 a ⁺[PF₆]^? (R=Ph) and 7 b ⁺[PF₆]^? (R=Me)). In contrast to Ir, chloride abstraction from [Rh(cod)Cl{C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}] ( 1 b ) at room temperature afforded [Rh(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}₂]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 6 b ⁺[PF₆]^?) and [Rh(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 3 b ⁺[PF₆]^?) (minor); the reaction yielded exclusively the latter product in toluene at 110 °C. Double metallation of the azole ring (at both the C2 and the N3 atom) was also achieved: [Ir₂(cod)₂Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 10 ) and the heterodinuclear complex [IrRh(cod)₂Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 12 ) were fully characterized. The structures of complexes 1 b , 3 b ⁺[PF₆]^?, 6 a ⁺[PF₆]^?, 7 a ⁺[PF₆]^?, [Ir(cod){C₃HN₂(DippN=CMe)(DippN=CH)(Me)‐κ²(N3,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 9 ⁺[PF₆]^?), 10? Et₂O ? toluene, [Ir₂(CO)₄Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 11 ), and 12? 2 THF were determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

[(1R,2R)‐1,2‐Di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ2N,N′](α‐di­imine‐κ2N,N′)­platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), where α‐di­imine is 2,2′‐bi­pyridine and 1,10‐phen­anthroline

The title Pt^II complexes, viz. (2,2′‐bi­pyridine‐κ²N,N′)[(1R,2R)‐1,2‐di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ²N,N′]­platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), [Pt(C₆H₁₄N₂)(C₁₀H₈N₂)](PF₆)₂, and [(1R,2R)‐1,2‐di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ²N,N′](1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), [Pt(C₆H₁₄N₂)(C₁₂H₈N₂)](PF₆)₂, containing an aromatic α‐di­imine and a non‐planar di­amino­cyclo­hexane, both form a ladder‐type structure, which is constructed via loose π–π stacking on the α‐di­imine ligands and hydrogen bonding between the cyclic amines and the counter‐anions. In the former compound, there are two independent complex cations, both of which have a twofold axis through the Pt atom.     

A new heteroleptic phosphorescent cuprous complex supported by a BINAP ligand: synthesis,structure, luminescence properties and theoretical analyses

Luminescent cuprous complexes are an important class of coordination compounds due to their relative abundance, low cost and ability to display excellent luminescence. The heteroleptic cuprous complex solvate rac‐(acetonitrile‐κN)(3‐aminopyridine‐κN)[2,2′‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)‐1,1′‐binaphthyl‐κ²P,P′]copper(I) hexafluoridophosphate dichloromethane monosolvate, [Cu(C₅H₆N₂)(C₂H₃N)(C₄₄H₃₂P₂)]PF₆·CH₂Cl₂, conventionally abbreviated as [Cu(3‐PyNH₂)(CH₃CN)(BINAP)]PF₆·CH₂Cl₂, ( I ), where BINAP and 3‐PyNH₂ represent 2,2′‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)‐1,1′‐binaphthyl and 3‐aminopyridine, respectively, is described. In this complex solvate, the asymmetric unit consists of a cocrystallized dichloromethane molecule, a hexafluoridophosphate anion and a complete racemic heteroleptic cuprous complex cation in which the cuprous centre, in a tetrahedral CuP₂N₂ coordination, is coordinated by two P atoms from the BINAP ligand, one N atom from the 3‐PyNH₂ ligand and another N atom from a coordinated acetonitrile molecule. The UV–Vis absorption and photoluminescence properties of this heteroleptic cuprous complex have been studied on polycrystalline powder samples, which had been verified by powder X‐ray diffraction before recording the spectra. Time‐dependent density functional theory (TD‐DFT) calculations and a wavefunction analysis reveal that the orange–yellow phosphorescence emission should originate from intra‐ligand (BINAP) charge transfer mixed with a little of the metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer ³(IL+ML)CT excited state.     

A one‐dimensional copper coordination polymer containing both dicyan­amide and 1,10‐phenanthroline ligands

The crystal structure of catena‐poly­[[[acetato(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)copper(II)]‐μ‐dicyan­amido‐κ²N¹:N⁵] trihydrate], {[Cu(C₂H₃O₂)(C₂N₃)(C₁₂H₈N₂)]·3H₂O}_n, consists of a zigzag chain formed by the polymer [Cu(CH₃COO)(dca)(phen)]_n (phen is 1,10‐phenanthroline and dca is dicyan­amide), with three water mol­ecules per repeat unit of the polymer. The Cu^II atom has a slightly distorted square‐pyramidal coordination environment consisting of two N atoms of the phen ligand, two nitrile N atoms of different dca ligands, one of them axial, and one O atom of the acetate anion. The compound forms a one‐dimensional chain using dca as an end‐to‐end bridging ligand. Non‐covalent interactions, π–π stacking and hydrogen bonding mediate the bundling of the polymer chains into a three‐dimensional structure, with the water mol­ecules playing an important role in the hydrogen bonding.     

Crystal‐to‐crystal transformation upon dehydration of a copper(II) 2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine complex

The reaction of 2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (terpy) with CuCl₂ in the presence of sodium sulfite led to the synthesis of the ionic complex aquachlorido(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridyl‐κ³N,N′,N′′)copper(II) chlorido(dithionato‐κO)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridyl‐κ³N,N′,N′′)cuprate(II) dihydrate, [CuCl(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)(H₂O)][CuCl(S₂O₆)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]·2H₂O, (I), and the in situ synthesis of the S₂O₆²⁻ dianion. Compound (I) is composed of a [CuCl(terpy)(H₂O)]⁺ cation, a [Cu(S₂O₆)(terpy)]⁻ anion and two solvent water molecules. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated the loss of two water molecules at ca 363 K, and at 433 K the weight loss indicated a total loss of 2.5 water molecules. The crystal structure analysis of the resulting pale‐green dried crystals, μ‐dithionato‐κ²O:O′‐bis[chlorido(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridyl‐κ³N,N′,N′′)copper(II)] monohydrate, [Cu₂Cl₂(S₂O₆)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)₂]·H₂O, (II), revealed a net loss of 1.5 water molecules and the formation of a binuclear complex with two [CuCl(terpy)]⁺ cations bridged by a dithionate dianion. The crystal‐to‐crystal transformation involved an effective reduction in the unit‐cell volume of ca 7.6%. In (I), the ions are linked by O—H...O hydrogen bonds involving the coordinated and solvent water molecules and O atoms of the dithionate unit, to form ribbon‐like polymer chains propagating in [100]. These chains are linked by Cu...Cl interactions [3.2626 (7) Å in the cation and 3.3492 (7) Å in the anion] centred about inversion centres, to form two‐dimensional networks lying in and parallel to (01). In (II), symmetry‐related molecules are linked by O—H...O hydrogen bonds involving the partially occupied disordered water molecule and an O atom of the bridging thiosulfite anion, to form ribbon‐like polymer chains propagating in [100]. These chains are also linked by Cu...Cl interactions [3.3765 (12) Å] centred about inversion centres to form similar two‐dimensional networks to (I) lying in and parallel to (02), crosslinked into three dimensions by C—H...O=S and C—H...O(water) interactions.     

In situ synthesis of mononuclear copper(II) complexes of the new tridentate ligand bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine

Two mononuclear copper complexes, {bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)methyl]amine‐κN}(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)(perchlorato‐κO)copper(II) perchlorate, [Cu(ClO₄)(C₅H₈N₂)(C₁₂H₁₉N₅)]ClO₄, (I), and {bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)methyl]amine‐κN}bis(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)copper(II) bis(hexafluoridophosphate), [Cu(C₅H₈N₂)₂(C₁₂H₁₉N₅)](PF₆)₂, (II), have been synthesized by the reactions of different copper salts with the tripodal ligand tris[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine (TDPA) in acetone–water solutions at room temperature. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed that they contain the new tridentate ligand bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine (BDPA), which cannot be obtained by normal organic reactions and has thus been captured in the solid state by in situ synthesis. The coordination of the Cu^II ion is distorted square pyramidal in (I) and distorted trigonal bipyramidal in (II). The new in situ generated tridentate BDPA ligand can act as a meridional or facial ligand during the process of coordination. The crystal structures of these two compounds are stabilized by classical hydrogen bonding as well as intricate nonclassical hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

A helical zinc(II) coordination polymer assembled from 1,3‐bis[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methoxy]benzene and benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid

In catena‐poly[[aqua[1,3‐bis(pyridine‐3‐ylmethoxy)benzene‐κN]zinc(II)]‐μ₂‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O⁴], [Zn(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₈H₁₆N₂O₂)(H₂O)]_n, each Zn^II centre is tetrahedrally coordinated by two O atoms of bridging carboxylate groups from two benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate anions (denoted L²⁻), one O atom from a water molecule and one N atom from a 1,3‐bis[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methoxy]benzene ligand (denoted bpmb). (Aqua)O—H...N hydrogen‐bonding interactions induce the formation of one‐dimensional helical [Zn(L)(bpmb)(H₂O)]_n chains which are interlinked through (aqua)O—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions, producing two‐dimensional corrugated sheets.     

Oxidative degradation of the organometallic iron(II) complex [Fe{bis[3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl]methane}(MeCN)(PMe3)](PF6)2: structure of the ligand decomposition product trapped via coordination to iron(II)

Iron is of interest as a catalyst because of its established use in the Haber–Bosch process and because of its high abundance and low toxicity. Nitrogen‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHC) are important ligands in homogeneous catalysis and iron–NHC complexes have attracted increasing attention in recent years but still face problems in terms of stability under oxidative conditions. The structure of the iron(II) complex [1,1′‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐2,2‐bi(1H‐imidazole)‐κN³][3,3′‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)‐1,1′‐methanediylbi(1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl‐κC²)](trimethylphosphane‐κP)iron(II) bis(hexafluoridophosphate), [Fe(C₁₇H₁₄N₆)(C₁₆H₁₂N₆)(C₃H₉P)](PF₆)₂, features coordination by an organic decomposition product of a tetradentate NHC ligand in an axial position. The decomposition product, a C—C‐coupled biimidazole, is trapped by coordination to still‐intact iron(II) complexes. Insights into the structural features of the organic decomposition products might help to improve the stability of oxidation catalysts under harsh conditions.     

catena‐Poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine)­silver(I)]‐μ‐nicotinato] and catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine)silver(I)]‐μ‐2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoato]

In catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine‐κ²N,N′)silver(I)]‐μ‐nico­tinato‐κ²N:O], [Ag(C₆H₄NO₂)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]_n, the Ag^I atom is tetracoordinated by two N atoms from the di‐2‐pyridyl­amine (BPA) ligand [Ag—N = 2.3785 (18) and 2.3298 (18) Å] and by one N atom and one carboxyl­ate O atom from nicotinate ligands [Ag—N = 2.2827 (15) Å and Ag—O = 2.3636 (14) Å]. Bridging by nicotinate N and O atoms generates a polymeric chain structure, which extends along [100]. The carboxyl O atom not bonded to the Ag atom takes part in an intrachain C—H⋯O hydrogen bond, further stabilizing the chain. Pairs of chains are linked by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to generate ribbons. There are no π–π interactions in this complex. In catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine‐κ²N,N′)silver(I)]‐μ‐2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoato‐κ²O¹:O²], [Ag(C₇H₅O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]_n, the Ag^I atom has a distorted tetrahedral coordination, with three strong bonds to two pyridine N atoms from the BPA ligand [Ag—N = 2.286 (5) and 2.320 (5) Å] and to one carboxyl­ate O atom from the 2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoate ligand [Ag—O = 2.222 (4) Å]; the fourth, weaker, Ag‐atom coordination is to one of the phenol O atoms [Ag⋯O = 2.703 (4) Å] of an adjacent moiety, and this interaction generates a polymeric chain along [100]. Pairs of chains are linked about inversion centers by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form ribbons, within which there are π–π interactions. The ribbons are linked about inversion centers by pairs of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and additional π–π interactions between inversion‐related pairs of 2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoate ligands to generate a three‐dimensional network.     

Bridging behaviour of the 2‐thiobarbiturate anion in its complexes with LiI and NaI

The structures of the Li^I and Na^I salts of 2‐thiobarbituric acid (2‐sulfanylidene‐1‐3‐diazinane‐4,6‐dione, H₂TBA) have been studied. μ‐Aqua‐octaaquabis(μ‐2‐thiobarbiturato‐κ²O:O′)bis(2‐thiobarbiturato‐κO)tetralithium(I) dihydrate, [Li₄(C₄H₃N₂O₂S)₄(H₂O)₉]·2H₂O, (I), crystallizes with four symmetry‐independent four‐coordinated Li^I cations and four independent HTBA⁻ anions. The structure contains two structurally non‐equivalent Li^I cations and two non‐equivalent HTBA⁻ anions (bridging and terminal). Eight of the coordinated water ligands are terminal and the ninth acts as a bridge between Li^I cations. Discrete [Li₄(HTBA)₄(H₂O)₉]·2H₂O complexes form two‐dimensional layers. Neighbouring layers are connected via hydrogen‐bonding interactions, resulting in a three‐dimensional network. Poly[μ₂‐aqua‐tetraaqua(μ₄‐2‐thiobarbiturato‐κ⁴O:O:S:S)(μ₂‐thiobarbiturato‐κ²O:S)disodium(I)], [Na₂(C₄H₃N₂O₂S)₂(H₂O)₅]_n, (II), crystallizes with six‐coordinated Na^I cations. The octahedra are pairwise connected through edge‐sharing by a water O atom and an O atom from the μ₄‐HTBA⁻ ligand, and these pairs are further top‐shared by the S atoms to form continuous chains along the a direction. Two independent HTBA⁻ ligands integrate the chains to give a three‐dimensional network.