Hamiltonian connectedness in 3-connected line graphs

We investigate graphs G such that the line graph L(G) is hamiltonian connected if and only if L(G) is 3-connected, and prove that if each 3-edge-cut contains an edge lying in a short cycle of G, then L(G) has the above mentioned property. Our result extends Kriesell’s recent result in [M. Kriesell, All 4-connected line graphs of claw free graphs are hamiltonian-connected, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 82 (2001) 306-315] that every 4-connected line graph of a claw free graph is hamiltonian connected. Another application of our main result shows that if L(G) does not have an hourglass (a graph isomorphic to K₅−E(C₄), where C₄ is an cycle of length 4 in K₅) as an induced subgraph, and if every 3-cut of L(G) is not independent, then L(G) is hamiltonian connected if and only if κ(L(G))≥3, which extends a recent result by Kriesell [M. Kriesell, All 4-connected line graphs of claw free graphs are hamiltonian-connected, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 82 (2001) 306-315] that every 4-connected hourglass free line graph is hamiltonian connected.     

The 2-hamiltonian cubes of graphs

This paper deals with the problem of characterizing the pairs of vertices x,y in a connected graph G such that G³ - {x,y} is hamiltonian, where G³ is the cube of G. It is known that the cube G³ is 2-hamiltonian if G is 2-connected. In this paper, we first prove the stronger result that G³ - {x,y} is hamiltonian if either x or y is not a cut-vertex of G, and then proceed to characterize those cut-vertices x and y of G such that G³ -{x,y} is hamiltonian. As a simple consequence of these, we obtain Schaar's characterization of a connected graph G such that G³ is 2-hamiltonian.     

Closure, stability and iterated line graphs with a 2-factor

We consider 2-factors with a bounded number of components in the n-times iterated line graph Lⁿ(G). We first give a characterization of graph G such that Lⁿ(G) has a 2-factor containing at most k components, based on the existence of a certain type of subgraph in G. This generalizes the main result of [L. Xiong, Z. Liu, Hamiltonian iterated line graphs, Discrete Math. 256 (2002) 407-422]. We use this result to show that the minimum number of components of 2-factors in the iterated line graphs Lⁿ(G) is stable under the closure operation on a claw-free graph G. This extends results in [Z. Ryjá?ek, On a closure concept in claw-free graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 70 (1997) 217-224; Z. Ryjá?ek, A. Saito, R.H. Schelp, Closure, 2-factors and cycle coverings in claw-free graphs, J. Graph Theory 32 (1999) 109-117; L. Xiong, Z. Ryjá?ek, H.J. Broersma, On stability of the hamiltonian index under contractions and closures, J. Graph Theory 49 (2005) 104-115].     

Supereulerian graphs and the Petersen graph

A graphG is supereulerian if G has a spanning eulerian subgraph.Boesch et al.[J.Graph Theory,1,79–84(1977)]proposed the problem of characterizing supereulerian graphs.In this paper,we prove that any 3-edge-connected graph with at most 11 edge-cuts of size 3 is supereulerian if and only if it cannot be contractible to the Petersen graph.This extends a former result of Catlin and Lai[J.Combin.Theory,Ser.B,66,123–139(1996)].     

The graph of perfect matching polytope and an extreme problem

For graph G, its perfect matching polytope Poly(G) is the convex hull of incidence vectors of perfect matchings of G. The graph corresponding to the skeleton of Poly(G) is called the perfect matching graph of G, and denoted by PM(G). It is known that PM(G) is either a hypercube or hamilton connected [D.J. Naddef, W.R. Pulleyblank, Hamiltonicity and combinatorial polyhedra, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 31 (1981) 297-312; D.J. Naddef, W.R. Pulleyblank, Hamiltonicity in (0-1)-polytope, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 37 (1984) 41-52]. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound of the number of lines for the graphs G whose PM(G) is bipartite in terms of sizes of elementary components of G and the order of G, respectively. Moreover, the corresponding extremal graphs are constructed.     

Distinguishing Cartesian powers of graphs

The distinguishing number D(G) of a graph is the least integer d such that there is a d‐labeling of the vertices of G that is not preserved by any nontrivial automorphism of G. We show that the distinguishing number of the square and higher powers of a connected graph G ≠ K₂, K₃ with respect to the Cartesian product is 2. This result strengthens results of Albertson [Electron J Combin, 12 ( 1 ), #N17] on powers of prime graphs, and results of Klav?ar and Zhu [Eu J Combin, to appear]. More generally, we also prove that d(G □ H) = 2 if G and H are relatively prime and |H| ≤ |G| < 2^|H| ? |H|. Under additional conditions similar results hold for powers of graphs with respect to the strong and the direct product. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 53: 250–260, 2006     

Hamiltonicity of 3-Arc Graphs

An arc of a graph is an oriented edge and a 3-arc is a 4-tuple (v, u, x, y) of vertices such that both (v, u, x) and (u, x, y) are paths of length two. The 3-arc graph of a graph G is defined to have vertices the arcs of G such that two arcs uv, xy are adjacent if and only if (v, u, x, y) is a 3-arc of G. We prove that any connected 3-arc graph is hamiltonian, and all iterative 3-arc graphs of any connected graph of minimum degree at least three are hamiltonian. As a corollary we obtain that any vertex-transitive graph which is isomorphic to the 3-arc graph of a connected arc-transitive graph of degree at least three must be hamiltonian. This confirms the conjecture, for this family of vertex-transitive graphs, that all vertex-transitive graphs with finitely many exceptions are hamiltonian. We also prove that if a graph with at least four vertices is Hamilton-connected, then so are its iterative 3-arc graphs.     

Hamilton cycles in strong products of graphs

We prove that the strong product of any n connected graphs of maximum degree at most n contains a Hamilton cycle. In particular, G^Δ(G) is hamiltonian for each connected graph G, which answers in affirmative a conjecture of Bermond, Germa, and Heydemann. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 48: 299–321, 2005     

Prism‐hamiltonicity of triangulations

The prism over a graph G is the Cartesian product G □ K₂ of G with the complete graph K₂. If the prism over G is hamiltonian, we say that G is prism‐hamiltonian. We prove that triangulations of the plane, projective plane, torus, and Klein bottle are prism‐hamiltonian. We additionally show that every 4‐connected triangulation of a surface with sufficiently large representativity is prism‐hamiltonian, and that every 3‐connected planar bipartite graph is prism‐hamiltonian. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 57: 181–197, 2008     

Hamiltonian connected hourglass free line graphs

Thomassen [Reflections on graph theory, J. Graph Theory 10 (1986) 309-324] conjectured that every 4-connected line graph is hamiltonian. An hourglass is a graph isomorphic to K₅-E(C₄), where C₄ is a cycle of length 4 in K₅. In Broersma et al. [On factors of 4-connected claw-free graphs, J. Graph Theory 37 (2001) 125-136], it is shown that every 4-connected line graph without an induced subgraph isomorphic to the hourglass is hamiltonian connected. In this note, we prove that every 3-connected, essentially 4-connected hourglass free line graph, is hamiltonian connected.     

On s‐Hamiltonian Line Graphs

For an integer s ≥ 0, a graph G is s‐hamiltonian if for any vertex subset with |S^′| ≤ s, G ‐ S^′ is hamiltonian. It is well known that if a graph G is s‐hamiltonian, then G must be (s+2)‐connected. The converse is not true, as there exist arbitrarily highly connected nonhamiltonian graphs. But for line graphs, we prove that when s ≥ 5, a line graph is s‐hamiltonian if and only if it is (s+2)‐connected.     

Strengthening Erdös–Pósa property for minor‐closed graph classes

Let ?? and ?? be graph classes. We say that ?? has the Erd?s–Pósa property for ?? if for any graph G ∈??, the minimum vertex covering of all ??‐subgraphs of G is bounded by a function f of the maximum packing of ??‐subgraphs in G (by ??‐subgraph of G we mean any subgraph of G that belongs to ??). Robertson and Seymour [J Combin Theory Ser B 41 (1986), 92–114] proved that if ?? is the class of all graphs that can be contracted to a fixed planar graph H, then ?? has the Erd?s–Pósa property for the class of all graphs with an exponential bounding function. In this note, we prove that this function becomes linear when ?? is any non‐trivial minor‐closed graph class. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 66:235‐240, 2011     

一类具有最大末块数和割点数的4-正则图

图G的一个顶点称为割点是指删去该顶点,图的分支数增加,而图G的一个末块是指仅包含G的一个割点的块.对无爪且不含4-团的4-正则图,给出了它的末块数与割点数的上界且刻划了达到这些上界的极值图.     

Hourglasses and Hamilton cycles in 4‐connected claw‐free graphs

We show that if G is a 4‐connected claw‐free graph in which every induced hourglass subgraph S contains two non‐adjacent vertices with a common neighbor outside S, then G is hamiltonian. This extends the fact that 4‐connected claw‐free, hourglass‐free graphs are hamiltonian, thus proving a broader special case of a conjecture by Matthews and Sumner. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 48: 267–276, 2005     

On stability of the hamiltonian index under contractions and closures

The hamiltonian index of a graph G is the smallest integer k such that the k‐th iterated line graph of G is hamiltonian. We first show that, with one exceptional case, adding an edge to a graph cannot increase its hamiltonian index. We use this result to prove that neither the contraction of an A_G(F)‐contractible subgraph F of a graph G nor the closure operation performed on G (if G is claw‐free) affects the value of the hamiltonian index of a graph G. AMS Subject Classification (2000): 05C45, 05C35. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Thomassen's conjecture implies polynomiality of 1‐Hamilton‐connectedness in line graphs

A graph G is 1‐Hamilton‐connected if G?x is Hamilton‐connected for every x∈V(G), and G is 2‐edge‐Hamilton‐connected if the graph G+ X has a hamiltonian cycle containing all edges of X for any X?E⁺(G) = {xy| x, y∈V(G)} with 1≤|X|≤2. We prove that Thomassen's conjecture (every 4‐connected line graph is hamiltonian, or, equivalently, every snark has a dominating cycle) is equivalent to the statements that every 4‐connected line graph is 1‐Hamilton‐connected and/or 2‐edge‐Hamilton‐connected. As a corollary, we obtain that Thomassen's conjecture implies polynomiality of both 1‐Hamilton‐connectedness and 2‐edge‐Hamilton‐connectedness in line graphs. Consequently, proving that 1‐Hamilton‐connectedness is NP‐complete in line graphs would disprove Thomassen's conjecture, unless P = NP. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 69: 241–250, 2012     

Hamiltonian Connectedness in Claw-Free Graphs

If every vertex cut of a graph G contains a locally 2-connected vertex, then G is quasilocally 2-connected. In this paper, we prove that every connected quasilocally 2-connected claw-free graph is Hamilton-connected.     

An application of the combinatorial Nullstellensatz to a graph labelling problem

An antimagic labelling of a graph G with m edges and n vertices is a bijection from the set of edges of G to the set of integers {1,…,m}, such that all n vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with that vertex. A graph is called antimagic if it admits an antimagic labelling. In N. Hartsfield and G. Ringle, Pearls in Graph Theory, Academic Press, Inc., Boston, 1990, Ringel has conjectured that every simple connected graph, other than K₂, is antimagic. In this article, we prove a special case of this conjecture. Namely, we prove that if G is a graph on n=p^k vertices, where p is an odd prime and k is a positive integer that admits a C_p‐factor, then it is antimagic. The case p=3 was proved in D. Hefetz, J Graph Theory 50 (2005), 263–272. Our main tool is the combinatorial Nullstellensatz [N. Alon, Combin Probab Comput 8(1–2) (1999), 7–29]. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65: 70–82, 2010.     

Closure, 2-factors,and cycle coverings in claw-free graphs

In this article, we study cycle coverings and 2-factors of a claw-free graph and those of its closure, which has been defined by the first author (On a closure concept in claw-free graphs, J Combin Theory Ser B 70 (1997), 217–224). For a claw-free graph G and its closure cl(G), we prove: (1) V(G) is covered by k cycles in G if and only if V(cl(G)) is covered by k cycles of cl(G); and (2) G has a 2-factor with at most k components if and only if cl(G) has a 2-factor with at most k components. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 32: 109–117, 1999     

Clique-critical graphs: Maximum size and recognition

The clique graph of G, K(G), is the intersection graph of the family of cliques (maximal complete sets) of G. Clique-critical graphs were defined as those whose clique graph changes whenever a vertex is removed. We prove that if G has m edges then any clique-critical graph in K^-1(G) has at most 2m vertices, which solves a question posed by Escalante and Toft [On clique-critical graphs, J. Combin. Theory B 17 (1974) 170-182]. The proof is based on a restatement of their characterization of clique-critical graphs. Moreover, the bound is sharp. We also show that the problem of recognizing clique-critical graphs is NP-complete.