Acyclic 5-choosability of planar graphs without 4-cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k-choosable. In this paper we prove that every planar graph without 4-cycles and without two 3-cycles at distance less than 3 is acyclically 5-choosable. This improves a result in [M. Montassier, P. Ochem, A. Raspaud, On the acyclic choosability of graphs, J. Graph Theory 51 (2006) 281-300], which says that planar graphs of girth at least 5 are acyclically 5-choosable.     

Acyclic 4-choosability of planar graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. Given a list assignment L={L(v)∣v∈V} of G, we say G is acyclically L-list colorable if there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k-choosable. In this paper we prove that planar graphs without 4, 7, and 8-cycles are acyclically 4-choosable.     

A note on the acyclic 3-choosability of some planar graphs

An acyclic coloring of a graph G is a coloring of its vertices such that: (i) no two adjacent vertices in G receive the same color and (ii) no bicolored cycles exist in G. A list assignment of G is a function L that assigns to each vertex v∈V(G) a list L(v) of available colors. Let G be a graph and L be a list assignment of G. The graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if there exists an acyclic coloring ? of G such that ?(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V(G). If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment L with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V(G), then G is said to be acyclically k-choosable. Borodin et al. proved that every planar graph with girth at least 7 is acyclically 3-choosable (Borodin et al., submitted for publication [4]). More recently, Borodin and Ivanova showed that every planar graph without cycles of length 4 to 11 is acyclically 3-choosable (Borodin and Ivanova, submitted for publication [7]). In this note, we connect these two results by a sequence of intermediate sufficient conditions that involve the minimum distance between 3-cycles: we prove that every planar graph with neither cycles of lengths 4 to 7 (resp. to 8, to 9, to 10) nor triangles at distance less than 7 (resp. 5, 3, 2) is acyclically 3-choosable.     

Every toroidal graph is acyclically 8-choosable

A proper coloring of a graphG is acyclic if G contains no 2-colored cycle.A graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V(G)},there exists a proper acyclic coloringφof G such thatφ(v)∈L(v)for all v∈V(G).If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment L with|L(v)|≥k for all v∈V(G),then G is acyclically k-choosable.In this article,we prove that every toroidal graph is acyclically 8-choosable.     

Linear choosability of graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a non-oriented graph G is linear if the graph induced by the vertices of any two color classes is a forest of paths. A graph G is linearly L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V(G)}, there exists a linear coloring c of G such that c(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V(G). If G is linearly L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|?k for all v∈V(G), then G is said to be linearly k-choosable. In this paper, we investigate the linear choosability for some families of graphs: graphs with small maximum degree, with given maximum average degree, outerplanar and planar graphs. Moreover, we prove that deciding whether a bipartite subcubic planar graph is linearly 3-colorable is an NP-complete problem.     

Bordeaux 3-color conjecture and 3-choosability

A graph G=(V,E) is list L-colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V}, there exists a proper coloring c of G such that c(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is list L-colorable for every list assignment with |L(v)|?k for all v∈V, then G is said to be k-choosable.In this paper, we prove that (1) every planar graph either without 4- and 5-cycles, and without triangles at distance less than 4, or without 4-, 5- and 6-cycles, and without triangles at distance less than 3 is 3-choosable; (2) there exists a non-3-choosable planar graph without 4-cycles, 5-cycles, and intersecting triangles. These results have some consequences on the Bordeaux 3-color conjecture by Borodin and Raspaud [A sufficient condition for planar graphs to be 3-colorable. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 88 (2003) 17-27].     

Acyclic 5-choosability of planar graphs without 4-cycles

The conjecture on the acyclic 5-choosability of planar graphs (Borodin et al., 2002) as yet has been verified only for several restricted classes of graphs: those of girth at least 5 (Montassier, Ochem, and Raspaud, 2006), without 4- and 5-cycles or without 4- and 6-cycles (Montassier, Raspaud, and Wang, 2007), with neither 4-cycles nor chordal 6-cycles (Zhang and Xu, 2009), with neither 4- cycles nor two 3-cycles at distance less than 3 (Chen and Wang, 2008), and with neither 4-cycles nor intersecting 3-cycles (Chen and Raspaud, 2010). Wang and Chen (2009) proved that the planar graphs without 4-cycles are acyclically 6-choosable. We prove that a planar graph without 4-cycles is acyclically 5-choosable, which is a common strengthening of all above-mentioned results.     

Acyclic 6-choosability of planar graphs without adjacent short cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycles.Given a list assignment L={L(v)|v∈V}of G,we say that G is acyclically L-colorable if there exists a proper acyclic coloringπof G such thatπ(v)∈L(v)for all v∈V.If G is acyclically L-colorable for any list assignment L with|L(v)|k for all v∈V(G),then G is acyclically k-choosable.In this paper,we prove that every planar graph G is acyclically 6-choosable if G does not contain 4-cycles adjacent to i-cycles for each i∈{3,4,5,6}.This improves the result by Wang and Chen(2009).     

Planar graphs without 4‐cycles are acyclically 6‐choosable

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V, E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L‐list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v)|v∈V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L‐list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k‐choosable. In this paper we prove that every planar graph G without 4‐cycles is acyclically 6‐choosable. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 61: 307–323, 2009     

Acyclic 5‐choosability of planar graphs without small cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G = (V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L‐list colorable if for a given list assignment L = {L(v): v: ∈ V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring ? of G such that ?(v) ∈ L(v) for all v ∈ V. If G is acyclically L‐list colorable for any list assignment with |L (v)|≥ k for all v ∈ V, then G is acyclically k‐choosable. In this article, we prove that every planar graph G without 4‐ and 5‐cycles, or without 4‐ and 6‐cycles is acyclically 5‐choosable. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 54: 245–260, 2007     

Acyclic 4-choosability of planar graphs with neither 4-cycles nor triangular 6-cycles

Every planar graph is known to be acyclically 7-choosable and is conjectured to be acyclically 5-choosable (Borodin et al. 2002) [7]. This conjecture if proved would imply both Borodin’s acyclic 5-color theorem (1979) and Thomassen’s 5-choosability theorem (1994). However, as yet it has been verified only for several restricted classes of graphs.Some sufficient conditions are also obtained for a planar graph to be acyclically 4-choosable and 3-choosable. In particular, acyclic 4-choosability was proved for the following planar graphs: without 3-cycles and 4-cycles (Montassier, 2006 [23]), without 4-cycles, 5-cycles and 6-cycles (Montassier et al. 2006 [24]), and either without 4-cycles, 6-cycles and 7-cycles, or without 4-cycles, 6-cycles and 8-cycles (Chen et al. 2009 [14]).In this paper it is proved that each planar graph with neither 4-cycles nor 6-cycles adjacent to a triangle is acyclically 4-choosable, which covers these four results.     

A sufficient condition for planar graphs to be acyclically 5‐choosable

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G = (V, E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. Given a list assignment L = {L(v)|v∈V} of G, we say G is acyclically L‐list colorable if there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L‐list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k‐choosable. In this article we prove that every planar graph without 4‐cycles and without intersecting triangles is acyclically 5‐choosable. This improves the result in [M. Chen and W. Wang, Discrete Math 308 (2008), 6216–6225], which says that every planar graph without 4‐cycles and without two triangles at distance less than 3 is acyclically 5‐choosable. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

On the acyclic choosability of graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G = (V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is L‐list colorable if for a given list assignment L = {L(v): v ∈ V}, there exists a proper coloring c of G such that c (v) ∈ L(v) for all v ∈ V. If G is L‐list colorable for every list assignment with |L (v)| ≥ k for all v ∈ V, then G is said k‐choosable. A graph is said to be acyclically k‐choosable if the obtained coloring is acyclic. In this paper, we study the links between acyclic k‐choosability of G and Mad(G) defined as the maximum average degree of the subgraphs of G and give some observations about the relationship between acyclic coloring, choosability, and acyclic choosability. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 51: 281–300, 2006     

A note on list improper coloring of plane graphs

A list-assignment L to the vertices of G is an assignment of a set L(v) of colors to vertex v for every v∈V(G). An (L,d)^∗-coloring is a mapping ? that assigns a color ?(v)∈L(v) to each vertex v∈V(G) such that at most d neighbors of v receive color ?(v). A graph is called (k,d)^∗-choosable, if G admits an (L,d)^∗-coloring for every list assignment L with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V(G). In this note, it is proved that every plane graph, which contains no 4-cycles and l-cycles for some l∈{8,9}, is (3,1)^∗-choosable.     

Acyclic 4-coloring of planar graphs without 4- and 5-cycles

Every planar graph is known to be acyclically 5-colorable (O.V.Borodin, 1976). Some sufficient conditions are also obtained for a planar graph to be acyclically 4- and 3-colorable. In particular, the acyclic 4-colorability was proved for the following planar graphs: without 3- and 4-cycles (O.V.Borodin, A.V. Kostochka, and D.R.Woodall, 1999), without 4-, 5-, and 6-cycles, or without 4-, 5-, and 7-cycles, or without 4-, 5-, and intersecting 3-cycles (M. Montassier, A.Raspaud andW.Wang, 2006), and without 4-, 5-, and 8-cycles (M. Chen and A.Raspaud, 2009). The purpose of this paper is to prove that each planar graph without 4- and 5-cycles is acyclically 4-colorable.     

Edge-choosability of planar graphs without adjacent triangles or without 7-cycles

A graph G is edge-L-colorable, if for a given edge assignment L={L(e):e∈E(G)}, there exists a proper edge-coloring ? of G such that ?(e)∈L(e) for all e∈E(G). If G is edge-L-colorable for every edge assignment L with |L(e)|≥k for e∈E(G), then G is said to be edge-k-choosable. In this paper, we prove that if G is a planar graph with maximum degree Δ(G)≠5 and without adjacent 3-cycles, or with maximum degree Δ(G)≠5,6 and without 7-cycles, then G is edge-(Δ(G)+1)-choosable.     

Acyclic edge coloring of subcubic graphs

An acyclic edge coloring of a graph is a proper edge coloring such that there are no bichromatic cycles. The acyclic chromatic index of a graph is the minimum number k such that there is an acyclic edge coloring using k colors and it is denoted by a^′(G). From a result of Burnstein it follows that all subcubic graphs are acyclically edge colorable using five colors. This result is tight since there are 3-regular graphs which require five colors. In this paper we prove that any non-regular connected graph of maximum degree 3 is acyclically edge colorable using at most four colors. This result is tight since all edge maximal non-regular connected graphs of maximum degree 3 require four colors.     

On 3-colorable non-4-choosable planar graphs

An L-list coloring of a graph G is a proper vertex coloring in which every vertex v gets a color from a list L(v) of allowed colors. G is called k-choosable if all lists L(v) have exactly k elements and if G is L-list colorable for all possible assignments of such lists. Verifying conjectures of Erdos, Rubin and Taylor it was shown during the last years that every planar graph is 5-choosable and that there are planar graphs which are not 4-choosable. The question whether there are 3-colorable planar graphs which are not 4-choosable remained unsolved. The smallest known example far a non-4-choosable planar graph has 75 vertices and is described by Gutner. In fact, this graph is also 3 colorable and answers the above question. In addition, we give a list assignment for this graph using 5 colors only in all of the lists together such that the graph is not List-colorable. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Acyclic 4-colorability of planar graphs without cycles of length 4 or 6

Every planar graph is known to be acyclically 5-colorable (O. V. Borodin, 1976), which bound is precise. Some sufficient conditions are also obtained for a planar graph to be acyclically 4-colorable. In particular, the acyclic 4-colorabilitywas proved for the following planar graphs: without 3- and 4-cycles (O. V. Borodin, A. V. Kostochka, and D. R. Woodall, 1999), without 4-, 5-, and 6-cycles (M. Montassier, A. Raspaud, and W. Wang, 2006), and either without 4-, 6-, and 7-cycles or without 4-, 6-, and 8-cycles (M. Chen, A. Raspaud, and W. Wang, 2009). In this paper it is proved that each planar graph with neither 4-cycles nor 6-cycles is acyclically 4-colorable.