[Hg2(μ‐bpe)(μ‐OAc)2(μ‐SCN)2]n,a New Two‐Dimensional Coordination Polymer Involving Three Simultaneously Bridging Ligands: 1,2‐Bis(4‐pyridyle)ethene,Acetate, and Thiocyanate

A new mercury(II) complex of 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyle)ethene (bpe) with anionic acetate and thiocyanate ligands has been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The single crystal X‐ray analysis shows that the complex is a two‐dimensional polymer with simultaneously bridging 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyle)ethane, acetate and thiocyanate ligands and basic repeating dimeric [Hg₂(μ‐bpe)(μ‐OAc)₂(μ‐SCN)₂] units. The two‐dimensional system forms a three‐dimensional network by packing via π‐π stacking interactions.     

(4,4′‐Bipyridine)mercury(II) Coordination Polymers,Syntheses, and Structures

Mercury(II) complexes with 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) ligand were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, and IR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy. The structures of the complexes [Hg₃(4,4′‐bipy)₂(CH₃COO)₂(SCN)₄]_n ( 1 ), [Hg₅(4,4′‐bipy)₅(SCN)₁₀]_n ( 2 ), [Hg₂(4,4′‐bipy)₂(CH₃COO)₂]_n(ClO₄)_2n ( 3 ), and [Hg(4,4′‐bipy)I₂]_n ( 4 ) were determined by X‐ray crystallography. The single‐crystal X‐ray data show that 2 and 4 are one‐dimensional zigzag polymers with four‐coordinate Hg‐atoms, whereas 1 is a one‐dimensional helical chain with two four‐coordinate and one six‐coordinate Hg‐atom. Complex 3 is a two‐dimensional polymer with a five‐coordinate Hg‐atom. These results show the capacity of the Hg‐ion to act as a soft acid that is capable to form compounds with coordination numbers four, five, and six and consequently to produce different forms of coordination polymers, containing one‐ and two‐dimensional networks.     

Syntheses,Characterization and X‐ray Structure of the First Silver(I) Complexes with 4‐Amino‐3‐thioxo‐3,4‐dihydro‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(2H)‐one

Reaction of thiocarbohydrazide with glyoxolic acid monohydrate led to 4‐amino‐3‐thioxo‐3,4‐dihydro‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(2H)‐one (AHTTO, 1 ). Treatment of 1 with AgNO₃ and PPh₃ gave thecomplexes [(PPh₃)₂Ag₂(μ‐N,S‐AHTTO)₂](NO₃)₂ ( 2 ) and [(PPh₃)₂Ag(AHTTO)]NO₃ · MeOH ( 3 ) was obtained under different conditions. All the compounds have been characterized by elemental analyses, IR spectroscopy and X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Direct Synthesis of PbO Nanoparticles From a Lead(II) Nano Coordination Polymer Precursor: Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and DFT Calculations of [Pb2(dmp)2(μ‐N3)2(μ‐ClO4)2]n with the First Pb2‐(μ‐ClO4)2 Unit

Nanostructures of a new coordination polymer of divalent lead with the ligand 2, 9‐dimethyl‐1, 10‐phenanthroline (dmp) containing the first Pb₂‐(μ‐ClO₄)₂ motif, [Pb₂(dmp)₂(μ‐N₃)₂(μ‐ClO₄)₂]_n ( 1 ), was synthesized by a sonochemical method that produces the coordination polymers at nano size. The new nanostructure was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray powder diffraction, IR, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. Compound 1 was structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and the single‐crystal X‐ray data shows that the coordination number of Pb^II ions is six, (PbN₄O₂), with two N‐donor atoms from aza‐aromatic base ligands and four O‐donors from two perchlorate anions and two N‐donors from two azide anions. It has a “stereo‐chemically active” electron lone pair, and the coordination sphere is hemidirected. The supramolecular features in these complexes are guided and controlled by weak directional intermolecular interactions. The chains interact with each other through π–π stacking interactions creating a 3D framework. The structure of the title complex was optimized by density functional theory calculations. Calculated structural parameters and IR spectra for the title complex are in agreement with the crystal structure. The PbO nanoparticles were obtained by thermolysis of 1 at 180 °C with oleic acid as a surfactant. The average diameter of the nanoparticles was estimated by the Scherrer equation to be 23 nm. The morphology and size of the prepared PbO samples were further observed using SEM.     

Synthesis and Structures of d10–d10 M2(μ‐dppm)2 Complexes with Sensitive Metal–Metal Distances in Response to the Binding of Sigma Donors

Diphosphine‐bridged dicopper(I) acetate complexes [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)]X ( 2 X; X^? = , ) and [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)(MeCN)]X ( 4 X) were prepared and the structures of 2 (PF₆ ) and 4 (PF₆ ) determined by X‐ray crystallography. The ground‐state geometries of [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)]⁺ and [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)(L)]⁺ (L = py, MeCN, THF, acetone, MeOH) were also obtained using density functional theory (DFT). The increased Cu – Cu distances found experimentally and theoretically by comparing the structures of cation [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)]⁺ and its derivatives [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)(L)]⁺ reflect the binding of various sigma donors (L). When using [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)]⁺ as a structure sensor, the electron‐donating strength of a sigma donor can be quantitatively expressed as a DFT‐calculated Cu – Cu distance with the relative strength in the order py > MeCN > THF > acetone > MeOH, as determined.     

Polynuclear Chlorido Metal(II) Complexes with 1,2‐Di(1H‐­tetrazol‐1‐yl)ethane as Ligand Forming One‐ and Two‐dimensional Structures

The preparation and characterization of three metal(II) chlorido complexes with 1,2‐di(1H‐tetrazol‐1‐yl)ethane (dte) ( 1 ) as ligand is presented. The complexes have the following formula: [CoCl₂(μ‐dte)(dte)₂]_n ( 2 ), [CuCl₂(μ‐dte)₂]_n ( 3 ), and [Cd(μ‐Cl)₂(μ‐dte)]_n ( 4 ). Single crystal X‐ray diffraction of all three metal complexes was performed and the structures are discussed. All three central metal atoms are connected to polynuclear structures by the μ‐bridging ligand. Cobalt and copper are connected to one‐dimensional chains. The central cadmium(II) atoms are additionally connected by the chloride anions to a two‐dimensional network. Further, the cobalt(II) complex represents a special case with two terminal dte ligands.     

[Fe2(μsb‐CO)(CO)3(NO)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und Koordinationsisomerie

[Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)]: Synthesis, X‐ray Crystal Structure and Isomerization Na[Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts with [NO][BF₄] at —60 °C in THF to the nitrosyl complex [Fe₂(CO)₆(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 2 ). The subsequent reaction of 2 with phosphanes (L) under mild conditions affords the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₅(NO)L(μ‐P^tBu₂)], L = PPh₃, ( 3a ); η‐dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), ( 3b ). In this case the phosphane substitutes one carbonyl ligand at the iron tetracarbonyl fragment in 2 , which was confirmed by the X‐ray crystal structure analysis of 3a . In solution 3b loses one CO ligand very easily to give dppm as bridging ligand on the Fe‐Fe bond. The thus formed compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ) occurs in solution in different solvents and over a wide temperature range as a mixture of the two isomers [Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4a ) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4b ). 4a was unambiguously characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis while 4b was confirmed both by NMR investigations in solution as well as by means of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the spontaneous reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) with NO at —60 °C in toluene yields a complicated mixture of products containing [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 6 ) as main product beside the isomers 4a and 4b occuring in very low yields.     

Nanoscale MnII‐Coordination Polymers for Cell Imaging and Heterogeneous Catalysis

A mixed ligand approach was exploited to synthesize a new series of Mn^II‐based coordination polymers (CPs), namely, CP1 {[Mn(μ‐dpa)(μ‐4,4′‐bp)]?MeOH}_∞, CP2 {[Mn₃(μ‐dpa)₃(2,2′‐bp)₂]}_∞, CP3 {[Mn₃(μ‐dpa)₃(1,10‐phen)₂]?2 H₂O}_∞, CP4 {[Mn(μ‐dpa)(μ‐4,4′‐bpe)_1.5]?H₂O}_∞, CP5 {[Mn₂(μ‐dpa)₂(μ‐4,4′‐bpe)₂]? DEF}_∞, and CP6 {[Mn(μ‐dpa)(μ‐4,4′‐bpe)_1.5]? DMA}_∞ (dpa=3,5‐dicarboxyphenyl azide, 2,2′‐bp=2,2′‐bipyridine, 1,10‐phen=1,10‐phenanthroline, 4,4′‐bpe=1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene, 4,4′‐bp=4,4′‐bipyridine, DEF=N,N‐diethylformamide, DMA=N,N‐dimethylacetamide), to develop multifunctional CPs. Various techniques, such as single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SXRD), FTIR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis, were employed to fully characterize these CPs. The majority of the CPs displayed a four‐connected sql topology, whereas CP4 and CP6 exhibited a two‐dimensional SnS network architecture, which was further entangled in a polycatenation mode. Compound CP1 displayed an open framework structure. The CPs were scaled down to the nanoregime in a ball mill for cell imaging studies. Whereas CP2 and CP4 were employed for cell imaging with RAW264.7 cells, CP1 was exploited for both cell imaging and heterogeneous catalysis in a cyanosilylation reaction.     

Heterodinukleare Komplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)4(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)3(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [CoRh(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)]

Heterobinuclear Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], and [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] [Ru₃Rh(CO)₇(μ₃‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂(^tBu₂PH)(μ‐Cl)₂] ( 2 ) yields by cluster degradation under CO pressure as main product the heterobinuclear complex [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 4 ). The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pcab with a = 15.6802(15), b = 28.953(3), c = 11.8419(19) Å and V = 5376.2(11) ų. The reaction of 4 with dppm (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) in THF at room temperature affords in good yields [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 7 ). 7 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 9.7503(19), b = 13.399(3), c = 15.823(3) Å and V = 1854.6 ų. Moreover single crystals of [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 9 ) could be obtained and the single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis revealed that 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/a with a = 11.611(2), b = 13.333(2), c = 18.186(3) Å and V = 2693.0(8) ų.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Two Succinato‐Bridged Macrocyclic Nickel(II) Complexes

Two dinuclear succinato‐bridged nickel(II) complexes [Ni(RR‐L)]₂(μ‐SA)(ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ) and [Ni(SS‐L)]₂(μ‐SA)(ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ) (L = 5, 5, 7, 12, 12, 14‐hexamethyl‐1, 4, 8, 11‐tetraazacyclotetradecane, SA = succinic acid) were synthesized and characterized by EA, Circular dichroism (CD), as well as IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses revealed that the Ni^II atoms display a distorted octahedral coordination arrangement, and the succinato ligand bridges two central Ni^II atoms in a bis bidentate fashion to form dimers in 1 and 2 . The monomers of {[Ni(RR‐L)]₂(μ‐SA)}²⁺ and {[Ni(SS‐L)]₂(μ‐SA)}²⁺ are connected by O–H ··· O and N–H ··· O hydrogen bonds into a 1D right‐handed and left‐handed helical chain along the b axis, respectively. The homochiral natures of 1 and 2 are confirmed by the results of CD spectroscopy.     

Synthese gemischt chalkogenido‐verbrückter Dirheniumkomplexe vom Typ Re2(μ‐ER)(μ‐E′R′)(CO)8 (E,E′ = S,Se, Te; R,R′ = org. Rest)

Synthesis of Mixed Chalcogenido‐Bridged Dirhenium Complexes of the Type Re₂(μ‐ER)(μ‐E′R′)(CO)₈ (E, E′ = S, Se, Te; R, R′ = org. Residue) Hydrido sulfido bridged complexes Re₂(μ‐H)(μ‐SR)(CO)₈ (R = Ph, naph, Cy) react with the base DBU to give the salts [DBUH][Re₂(μ‐SR)(CO)₈]. Upon addition of electrophiles R′E′Br (E′R = SPh, SePh, TePh) to the in situ prepared salts mixed chalcogenido bridged complexes Re₂(μ‐SR)(μ‐E′R′)(CO)₈ were formed. The structures of the new compounds Re₂(μ‐SCy)(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈ and Re₂(μ‐Snaph)(μ‐TePh)(CO)₈ were determined by single crystal X‐ray analyses. For the preparation of analogous selenido tellurido bridged complexes Re₂(μ‐SePh)(μ‐TeR)(CO)₈ the novel hydrido selenido bridged complex Re₂(μ‐H)(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈ was prepared from Re₂(CO)₈(NCMe)₂ and PhSeH. Its structure was determined by single crystal X‐ray analysis. Subsequent deprotonation with DBU gave in situ [DBUH][Re₂(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈] which upon addition of RTeBr (R = Ph, Buⁿ, Bu^t) formed the desired complexes Re₂(μ‐SePh)(μ‐TeR)(CO)₈. The reaction with Bu^tTeBr also yielded the novel spirocyclic complex (μ₄‐Te){Re₂(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈}₂ in low amounts. It was identified by single crystal X‐ray analysis. Re₂(μ‐SePh)(μ‐TeBu^t)(CO)₈ is oxidised in chloroform in the presence of air to give the novel complex (μ‐Te–Te‐μ){Re₂(μ‐SePh)(CO)₈}₂. All mixed chalcogenido bridged dirhenium complexes were proved to be dynamic in solution by ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The dynamic behaviour is based on the fast and permanent inversion of the sulfido and selenido bridges. The tellurido bridges are rigid on the time scale of ¹³C NMR spectroscopy.     

Tuning of crystallization method and ligand conformation to give a mononuclear compound or two‐dimensional SCO coordination polymer based on a new semi‐rigid V‐shaped bis‐pyridyl bis‐amide ligand

With the new semi‐rigid V‐shaped bidentate pyridyl amide compound 5‐methyl‐N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxamide (L) as an auxiliary ligand and the Fe^II ion as the metal centre, one mononuclear complex, bis(methanol‐κO)bis[5‐methyl‐N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxamide‐κN]bis(thiocyanato‐κN)iron(II), [Fe(SCN)₂(C₁₉H₁₆N₄O₂)₂(CH₃OH)₂] ( 1 ), and one two‐dimensional coordination polymer, catena‐poly[[[bis(thiocyanato‐κN)iron(II)]‐bis[μ‐5‐methyl‐N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxamide‐κ²N:N′]] methanol disolvate dihydrate], {[Fe(SCN)₂(C₁₉H₁₆N₄O₂)₂]·2CH₃OH·2H₂O}_n ( 2 ), were prepared by slow evaporation and H‐tube diffusion methods, respectively, indicating the effect of the method of crystallization on the structure type of the target product. Both complexes have been structurally characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. The single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that L functions as a monodentate ligand in mononuclear 1 , while it coordinates in a bidentate manner to two independent Fe(SCN)₂ units in complex 2 , with a different conformation from that in 1 and the ligands point in two almost orthogonal directions, therefore leading to a two‐dimensional grid‐like network. Investigation of the magnetic properties reveals the always high‐spin state of the Fe^II centre over the whole temperature range in 1 and a gradual thermally‐induced incomplete spin crossover (SCO) behaviour below 150 K in 2 , demonstrating the influence of the different coordination fields on the spin properties of the metal ions. The current results provide useful information for the rational design of functional complexes with different structure dimensionalities by employing different conformations of the ligand and different crystallization methods.     

First‐Row Transition‐Metal–Diborane and –Borylene Complexes

A combined experimental and quantum chemical study of Group 7 borane, trimetallic triply bridged borylene and boride complexes has been undertaken. Treatment of [{Cp*CoCl}₂] (Cp*=1,2,3,4,5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) with LiBH₄ ? thf at ?78 °C, followed by room‐temperature reaction with three equivalents of [Mn₂(CO)₁₀] yielded a manganese hexahydridodiborate compound [{(OC)₄Mn}(η⁶‐B₂H₆){Mn(CO)₃}₂(μ‐H)] ( 1 ) and a triply bridged borylene complex [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)(μ‐H)₂MnH(CO)₃] ( 2 ). In a similar fashion, [Re₂(CO)₁₀] generated [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)(μ‐H)₂ReH(CO)₃] ( 3 ) and [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)₂(μ‐H)Co(CO)₃] ( 4 ) in modest yields. In contrast, [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] under similar reaction conditions yielded a heterometallic semi‐interstitial boride cluster [(Cp*Co)(μ‐H)₃Ru₃(CO)₉B] ( 5 ). The solid‐state X‐ray structure of compound 1 shows a significantly shorter boron–boron bond length. The detailed spectroscopic data of 1 and the unusual structural and bonding features have been described. All the complexes have been characterized by using ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and X‐ray diffraction analysis. The DFT computations were used to shed light on the bonding and electronic structures of these new compounds. The study reveals a dominant B?H?Mn, a weak B?B?Mn interaction, and an enhanced B?B bonding in 1 .     

A New Chair‐shaped Conformation Containing HgHgOHgHgO: Synthesis and Structure of Hg4(L2)2(NO3)4 (L2 = morpholin‐4‐ylpyridin‐2‐ylmethyleneamine)

. The complex Hg₄(L²)₂(NO₃)₄ ( 1 ) (L² = morpholin‐4‐ylpyridin‐2‐ylmethyleneamine) has been synthesized and characterized by CHN analysis, IR, and UV/Vis spectroscopy. The crystal structure of 1 was determined using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structure of 1 contains four mercury atoms, four nitrate anions (two terminal and two bridge ones) and two L² ligand molecules. A chair shape, six‐membered ring is formed with the sequence OHgHgOHgHg built from Hg–Hg dumbbells and oxygen atoms from the nitrate co‐ligands. In the crystal structure, the asymmetric unit of the compound is built up by one‐half of the molecule. It contains the Hg₂²⁺ moiety with a mercury–mercury bonded core, in which one diimine ligand is coordinated to one of the mercury atoms. The nitrate anions act as anisobidentate and bidentate ligands.     

A Novel 4, 4'‐Azopyridine‐Bridged Manganese Polymer: Quasi Two‐dimensional Structure and Magnetic Properties

A novel coordination polymer {[Mn(azpy)(NCS)₂(MeOH)₂] · azpy}_n( 1 ) (azpy = 4, 4'‐azopyridine), has been synthesized and characterized by X‐ray diffraction. It consists of a quasi two‐dimensional network structure constructed from 1‐D chains of [Mn(azpy)(NCS)₂(MeOH)₂]_n connected by hydrogen bonds, which creates about 13.6 Å × 17.1 Å of channels. The coordination sphere of the manganese(II) ion is a distorted octahedron. The determination of the variable temperature magnetic susceptibilities (5—300 K) shows the existence of a very weak antiferromagnetic interaction with a J value of —0.03 cm^—1.     

A new two‐dimensional ZnII coordination polymer based on 1,3‐bis(2‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)benzene and 5‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylic acid: synthesis,crystal structure and physical properties

A novel two‐dimensional (2D) Zn^II coordination framework, poly[[μ‐1,3‐bis(2‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)benzene](μ‐5‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato)zinc(II)], [Zn(C₈H₃NO₆)(C₁₄H₁₄N₄)]_n or [Zn(NO₂‐BDC)(1,3‐BMIB)]_n [1,3‐BMIB is 1,3‐bis(2‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)benzene and NO₂‐H₂BDC is 5‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylic acid], has been prepared and characterized by IR, elemental analysis, thermal analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed that the compound is a new 2D polymer with a 6³ topology parallel to the (10) crystal planes based on left‐handed helices, right‐handed helical NO₂‐BDC–Zn chains and [Zn₂(1,3‐BMIB)₂]_n clusters. In the crystal, adjacent layers are further connected by C—H…O hydrogen bonds, C—H…π interactions, C—O…π interactions and N—O…π interactions to form a three‐dimensional structure in the solid state. In addition, the compound exhibits strong fluorescence emissions in the solid state at room temperature.     

N‐Triazolylpropanamide – an Acrylamide‐Derived Multifunctional Ligand for the Construction of Supramolecular Hydrogen‐Bonded Networks

The synthesis and single crystal X‐ray structure of the multifunctional acrylamide‐derived ligand N‐triazolylpropanamide ( 1 , = NTPA) are reported. The title compound was prepared in 72 % yield by Michael addition of 1, 2, 4‐triazole and acrylamide in the presence of Triton B (= trimethylbenzylammonium hydroxide) as catalyst. Treatment of 1 with FeCl₃(H₂O)₆ in MeOH/MeCN led to reduction and formation of the iron(II) complex (NTPA)₂FeCl₂(MeOH)₂ ( 2 , yellow prisms, 52 % yield). Both 1 and 2 were structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction. Surprisingly, the NTPA ligands in 2 are coordinated to iron in a monodentate fashion through a triazole ring nitrogen atom. In the crystal, both compounds form supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded networks.     

3‐(Pyridin‐4‐yl)acetylacetone: CdII and HgII compete for nitrogen coordination

3‐(Pyridin‐4‐yl)acetylacetone (HacacPy) acts as a pyridine‐type ligand towards Cd^II and Hg^II halides. With CdBr₂, the one‐dimensional polymer [Cd(μ‐Br)₂(HacacPy)Cd(μ‐Br)₂(HacacPy)₂]_∞ is obtained in which five‐ and six‐coordinated Cd^II cations alternate in the chain direction. Reaction of HacacPy with HgBr₂ results in [Hg(μ‐Br)Br(HacacPy)]_∞, a polymer in which each Hg^II centre is tetracoordinated. In both compounds, each metal(II) cation is N‐coordinated by at least one HacacPy ligand. Equimolar reaction between these Cd^II and Hg^II derivatives, either conducted in ethanol as solvent or via grinding in the solid state, leads to ligand redistribution and the formation of the well‐ordered bimetallic polymer catena‐poly[[bromidomercury(II)]‐μ‐bromido‐[aquabis[4‐hydroxy‐3‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one]cadmium(II)]‐di‐μ‐bromido], [CdHgBr₄(C₁₀H₁₁NO₂)₂(H₂O)]_n or [{HgBr}(μ‐Br){(HacacPy)₂Cd(H₂O)}(μ‐Br)₂]_∞. Hg^II and Cd^II cations alternate in the [100] direction. The HacacPy ligands do not bind to the Hg^II cations, which are tetracoordinated by three bridging and one terminal bromide ligand. The Cd^II centres adopt an only slightly distorted octahedral coordination. Three bromide ligands link them in a (2 + 1) pattern to neighbouring Hg^II atoms; two HacacPy ligands in a cis configuration, acting as N‐atom donors, and a terminal aqua ligand complete the coordination sphere. Classical O—H…Br hydrogen bonds stabilize the polymeric chain. O—H…O hydrogen bonds between aqua H atoms and the uncoordinated carbonyl group of an HacacPy ligand in a neighbouring strand in the c direction link the chains into layers in the (010) plane.     

A Novel Inorganic Clathrate Generated through Arene‐Arene Interactions

The direct mixing of CoCl₂, sodium 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylate (Na₂(2,6‐pda)), KSCN, and 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane (bpye) in water at the ambient temperature afforded purple crystals readily. The crystal structure, as determined by X‐ray diffraction crystallography, consists of discrete inorganic [Co₂(η³‐2,6‐pda)₂(μ‐SCN)₂(H₂O)₂] and organic bpye molecules. Adjacent dicobalt molecules are connected via intermolecular hydrogen bonds, to form one‐dimensional hydrophobic channels in the solid state, which serve as a host framework to incarcerate bpye guests inside. Every organic molecule attaches to four adjacent inorganic species via arene‐arene interactions. The facile approach in assembling the dicobalt and bpye molecules together into an inorganic clathrate is demonstrated.     

A Dynamic Crystal‐to‐Amorphous Transformation Microporous ZnII Mixed Neutral‐ligand Metal‐organic Polymer {[Zn(bpp)2(μ‐4,4′‐bipy)(H2O)2](ClO4)2·H2O}n

A new rarely reported Zn^II mixed‐polypyridine coordination polymer with both rigid and flexible spacers, {[Zn(bpp)₂(μ‐4,4′‐bipy)(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ · H₂O}_n ( 1 ), has been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR‐, ¹H NMR‐, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The thermal stability of compound 1 was studied by thermal gravimetric (TG) and differential thermal analyses (DTA). The single‐crystal X‐ray structure of 1 shows that the complex has been formed from a 1D polymer as a result of bridging by the 4,4′‐bipy ligands. Solution and solid‐state luminescent spectra of the compound 1 indicate intense fluorescent emissions at ca. 353.6 and 468.8 nm, respectively. Removal of the interstitial water guest molecules results in a loss of crystallinity, but exposure to water vapor reestablishes the original structure, thus constituting 1 as a third‐generation porous framework.