Cycle‐minors and subdivisions of wheels

In this paper we prove two results. The first is an extension of a result of Dirac which says that any set of n vertices of an n‐connected graph lies in a cycle. We prove that if V′ is a set of at most 2n vertices in an n‐connected graph G, then G has, as a minor, a cycle using all of the vertices of V′. The second result says that if G is an n+1‐connected graph with maximum vertex degree Δ then G contains a subgraph that is a subdivision of W_2n if and only if Δ≥2n. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 62: 100–108, 2009     

Equitable coloring of random graphs

An equitable coloring of a graph is a proper vertex coloring such that the sizes of any two color classes differ by at most one. The least positive integer k for which there exists an equitable coloring of a graph G with k colors is said to be the equitable chromatic number of G and is denoted by χ₌(G). The least positive integer k such that for any k′ ≥ k there exists an equitable coloring of a graph G with k′ colors is said to be the equitable chromatic threshold of G and is denoted by χ₌*(G). In this paper, we investigate the asymptotic behavior of these coloring parameters in the probability space G(n,p) of random graphs. We prove that if n^?1/5+? < p < 0.99 for some 0 < ?, then almost surely χ(G(n,p)) ≤ χ₌(G(n,p)) = (1 + o(1))χ(G(n,p)) holds (where χ(G(n,p)) is the ordinary chromatic number of G(n,p)). We also show that there exists a constant C such that if C/n < p < 0.99, then almost surely χ(G(n,p)) ≤ χ₌(G(n,p)) ≤ (2 + o(1))χ(G(n,p)). Concerning the equitable chromatic threshold, we prove that if n^?(1??) < p < 0.99 for some 0 < ?, then almost surely χ(G(n,p)) ≤ χ₌* (G(n,p)) ≤ (2 + o(1))χ(G(n,p)) holds, and if < p < 0.99 for some 0 < ?, then almost surely we have χ(G(n,p)) ≤ χ₌*(G(n,p)) = O_?(χ(G(n,p))). © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2009     

The game chromatic number of random graphs

Given a graph G and an integer k, two players take turns coloring the vertices of G one by one using k colors so that neighboring vertices get different colors. The first player wins iff at the end of the game all the vertices of G are colored. The game chromatic number χ_g(G) is the minimum k for which the first player has a winning strategy. In this study, we analyze the asymptotic behavior of this parameter for a random graph G_n,p. We show that with high probability, the game chromatic number of G_n,p is at least twice its chromatic number but, up to a multiplicative constant, has the same order of magnitude. We also study the game chromatic number of random bipartite graphs. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2008     

List Coloring of Random and Pseudo-Random Graphs

choice number of a graph G is the minimum integer k such that for every assignment of a set S(v) of k colors to every vertex v of G, there is a proper coloring of G that assigns to each vertex v a color from S(v). It is shown that the choice number of the random graph G(n, p(n)) is almost surely whenever . A related result for pseudo-random graphs is proved as well. By a special case of this result, the choice number (as well as the chromatic number) of any graph on n vertices with minimum degree at least in which no two distinct vertices have more than common neighbors is at most . Received: October 13, 1997     

Extension of Turán's Theorem to the 2-Stability Number

 Given a graph G with n vertices and stability number α(G), Turán's Theorem gives a lower bound on the number of edges in G. Furthermore, Turán has proved that the lower bound is only attained if G is the union of α(G) disjoint balanced cliques. We prove a similar result for the 2-stability number α₂(G) of G, which is defined as the largest number of vertices in a 2-colorable subgraph of G. Given a graph G with n vertices and 2-stability number α₂(G), we give a lower bound on the number of edges in G and characterize the graphs for which this bound is attained. These graphs are the union of isolated vertices and disjoint balanced cliques. We then derive lower bounds on the 2-stability number, and finally discuss the extension of Turán's Theorem to the q-stability number, for q>2. Received: July 21, 1999 Final version received: August 22, 2000 Present address: GERAD, 3000 ch. de la Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec H3T 2A7, Canada. e-mail: Alain.Hertz@gerad.ca     

On the size of graphs labeled with a condition at distance two

A labeling of graph G with a condition at distance two is an integer labeling of V(G) such that adjacent vertices have labels that differ by at least two, and vertices distance two apart have labels that differ by at least one. The lambda-number of G, λ(G), is the minimum span over all labelings of G with a condition at distance two. Let G(n, k) denote the set of all graphs with order n and lambda-number k. In this paper, we examine the sizes of graphs in G(n, k). We modify Chvàtal's result on non-hamiltonian graphs to obtain a formula for the minimum size of a graph in G(n, k), and we use an algorithmic approach to obtain a formula for the maximum size. Finally, we show that for any integer j between the maximum and minimum sizes there exists a graph with size j in G(n, k). © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

A constructive approach for the lower bounds on the Ramsey numbers R (s,t)

Graph G is a (k, p)‐graph if G does not contain a complete graph on k vertices K_k, nor an independent set of order p. Given a (k, p)‐graph G and a (k, q)‐graph H, such that G and H contain an induced subgraph isomorphic to some K_k?1‐free graph M, we construct a (k, p + q ? 1)‐graph on n(G) + n(H) + n(M) vertices. This implies that R (k, p + q ? 1) ≥ R (k, p) + R (k, q) + n(M) ? 1, where R (s, t) is the classical two‐color Ramsey number. By applying this construction, and some its generalizations, we improve on 22 lower bounds for R (s, t), for various specific values of s and t. In particular, we obtain the following new lower bounds: R (4, 15) ≥ 153, R (6, 7) ≥ 111, R (6, 11) ≥ 253, R (7, 12) ≥ 416, and R (8, 13) ≥ 635. Most of the results did not require any use of computer algorithms. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 47: 231–239, 2004     

Can visibility graphs Be represented compactly?

We consider the problem of representing the visibility graph of line segments as a union of cliques and bipartite cliques. Given a graphG, a familyG={G ₁,G ₂,...,G _k } is called aclique cover ofG if (i) eachG _i is a clique or a bipartite clique, and (ii) the union ofG _i isG. The size of the clique coverG is defined as ∑ _i=1 ^k n _i , wheren _i is the number of vertices inG _i . Our main result is that there are visibility graphs ofn nonintersecting line segments in the plane whose smallest clique cover has size Ω(n ²/log² n). An upper bound ofO(n ²/logn) on the clique cover follows from a well-known result in extremal graph theory. On the other hand, we show that the visibility graph of a simple polygon always admits a clique cover of sizeO(nlog³ n), and that there are simple polygons whose visibility graphs require a clique cover of size Ω(n logn). The work by the first author was supported by National Science Foundation Grant CCR-91-06514. The work by the second author was supported by a USA-Israeli BSF grant. The work by the third author was supported by National Science Foundation Grant CCR-92-11541.     

The graphs G(n, k) of the Johnson Schemes are unique for n ≥ 20

Let G(n, k) denote the graph of the Johnson Scheme J(n, k), i.e., the graph whose vertices are all k-subsets of a fixed n-set, with two vertices adjacent if and only if their intersection is of size k ? 1. It is known that G(n, k) is a distance regular graph with diameter k. Much work has been devoted to the question of whether a distance regular graph with the parameters of G(n, k) must isomorphic to G(n, k). In this paper, this question is settled affirmatively for n ≥ 20. In fact the result is proved with weaker conditions.     

On relative length of longest paths and cycles

For a graph G, p(G) and c(G) denote the order of a longest path and a longest cycle of G, respectively. In this paper, we prove that if G is a 3 ‐connected graph of order n such that the minimum degree sum of four independent vertices is at least n+ 6, then p(G)?c(G)?2. By considering our result and the results in [J Graph Theory 20 (1995), 213–225; Amer Math Monthly 67 (1950), 55], we propose a conjecture which is a generalization of Bondy's conjecture. Furthermore, using our result, for a graph satisfying the above conditions, we obtain a new lower bound of the circumference and establish Thomassen's conjecture. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 62, 279–291, 2009     

On the tree representation of chordal graphs

We introduce the notion of the boundary clique and the k-overlap clique graph and prove the following: Every incomplete chordal graph has two nonadjacent simplicial vertices lying in boundary cliques. An incomplete chordal graph G is k-connected if and only if the k-overlap clique graph g_k(G) is connected. We give an algorithm to construct a clique tree of a connected chordal graph and characterize clique trees of connected chordal graphs using the algorithm.     

Rainbows in the Hypercube

Let Q_n be a hypercube of dimension n, that is, a graph whose vertices are binary n-tuples and two vertices are adjacent iff the corresponding n-tuples differ in exactly one position. An edge coloring of a graph H is called rainbow if no two edges of H have the same color. Let f(G,H) be the largest number of colors such that there exists an edge coloring of G with f(G,H) colors such that no subgraph isomorphic to H is rainbow. In this paper we start the investigation of this anti-Ramsey problem by providing bounds on f(Q_n,Q_k) which are asymptotically tight for k = 2 and by giving some exact results.     

Packing in regular graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a packing if the vertices in S are pairwise at distance at least 3 apart in G. The packing number of G, denoted by ρ(G), is the maximum cardinality of a packing in G. Favaron [Discrete Math. 158 (1996), 287–293] showed that if G is a connected cubic graph of order n different from the Petersen graph, then ρ(G) ≥ n/8. In this paper, we generalize Favaron’s result. We show that for k ≥ 3, if G is a connected k-regular graph of order n that is not a diameter-2 Moore graph, then ρ(G) ≥ n/(k² ? 1).     

Sharp bounds for decompositions of graphs into complete r-partite subgraphs

If G is a graph on n vertices and r ≥ 2, we let m_r(G) denote the minimum number of complete multipartite subgraphs, with r or fewer parts, needed to partition the edge set, E(G). In determining m_r(G), we may assume that no two vertices of G have the same neighbor set. For such reducedgraphs G, we prove that m_r(G) ≥ log₂ (n + r − 1)/r. Furthermore, for each k ≥ 0 and r ≥ 2, there is a unique reduced graph G = G(r, k) with m_r(G) = k for which equality holds. We conclude with a short proof of the known eigenvalue bound m_r(G) ≥ max{n₊ (G, n₋(G)/(r − 1)}, and show that equality holds if G = G(r, k). © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Restricted greedy clique decompositions and greedy clique decompositions ofK 4-free graphs

A greedy clique decomposition of a graph is obtained by removing maximal cliques from a graph one by one until the graph is empty. It has recently been shown that any greedy clique decomposition of a graph of ordern has at mostn ²/4 cliques. In this paper, we extend this result by showing that for any positive integerp, 3≤p any clique decomposisitioof a graph of ordern obtained by removing maximal cliques of order at leastp one by one until none remain, in which case the remaining edges are removed one by one, has at mostt _p-1( ⁿ ) cliques. Heret _p-1( ⁿ ) is the number of edges in the Turán graph of ordern, which has no complete subgraphs of orderp. In connection with greedy clique decompositions, P. Winkler conjectured that for any greedy clique decompositionC of a graphG of ordern the sum over the number of vertices in each clique ofC is at mostn ²/2. We prove this conjecture forK ₄-free graphs and show that in the case of equality forC andG there are only two possibilities:

1. G?K _n/2,n/2
2. G is complete 3-partite, where each part hasn/3 vertices.

We show that in either caseC is completely determined.     

Non-traceability of large connected claw-free graphs

Let G be a connected claw-free graph on n vertices. Let ς₃(G) be the minimum degree sum among triples of independent vertices in G. It is proved that if ς₃(G) ≥ n − 3 then G is traceable or else G is one of graphs G_n each of which comprises three disjoint nontrivial complete graphs joined together by three additional edges which induce a triangle K₃. Moreover, it is shown that for any integer k ≥ 4 there exists a positive integer ν(k) such that if ς₃(G) ≥ n − k, n > ν(k) and G is non-traceable, then G is a factor of a graph G_n. Consequently, the problem HAMILTONIAN PATH restricted to claw-free graphs G = (V, E) (which is known to be NP-complete) has linear time complexity O(|E|) provided that ς₃(G) ≥ . This contrasts sharply with known results on NP-completeness among dense graphs. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 27: 75–86, 1998     

On n-Hamiltonian line graphs

With each nonempty graph G one can associate a graph L(G), called the line graph of G, with the property that there exists a one-to-one correspondence between E(G) and V(L(G)) such that two vertices of L(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G are adjacent. For integers m ≥ 2, the mth iterated line graph L^m(G) of G is defined to be L(L^m-1(G)). A graph G of order p ≥ 3 is n-Hamiltonian, 0 ≤ n ≤ p ? 3, if the removal of any k vertices, 0 ≤ k ≤ n, results in a Hamiltonian graph. It is shown that if G is a connected graph with δ(G) ≥ 3, where δ(G) denotes the minimum degree of G, then L²(G) is (δ(G) ? 3)-Hamiltonian. Furthermore, if G is 2-connected and δ(G) ≥ 4, then L²(G) is (2δ(G) ? 4)-Hamiltonian. For a connected graph G which is neither a path, a cycle, nor the graph K(1, 3) and for any positive integer n, the existence of an integer k such that L^m(G) is n-Hamiltonian for every m ≥ k is exhibited. Then, for the special case n = 1, bounds on (and, in some cases, the exact value of) the smallest such integer k are determined for various classes of graphs.     

Diameters of iterated clique graphs of chordal graphs

The clique graph K(G) of a graph is the intersection graph of maximal cliques of G. The iterated clique graph Kⁿ(G) is inductively defined as K(K^n?1(G)) and K¹(G) = K(G). Let the diameter diam(G) be the greatest distance between all pairs of vertices of G. We show that diam(Kⁿ(G)) = diam(G) — n if G is a connected chordal graph and n ≤ diam(G). This generalizes a similar result for time graphs by Bruce Hedman.     

The structure of digraphs associated with the congruence <Emphasis Type="Italic">x</Emphasis><Superscript><Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis></Superscript> ≡ <Emphasis Type="Italic">y</Emphasis> (mod <Emphasis Type="Italic">n</Emphasis>)

We assign to each pair of positive integers n and k ⩾ 2 a digraph G(n, k) whose set of vertices is H = {0, 1, ..., n − 1} and for which there is a directed edge from a ∈ H to b ∈ H if a ^k ≡ b (mod n). We investigate the structure of G(n, k). In particular, upper bounds are given for the longest cycle in G(n, k). We find subdigraphs of G(n, k), called fundamental constituents of G(n, k), for which all trees attached to cycle vertices are isomorphic.     

Convergence in homogeneous random graphs

For a sequence p? = (p(1), p(2), ‥ .), let G(n, p?) denote the random graph with vertex set {1, 2, ‥ ., n} in which two vertices i, j are adjacent with probability p(|i ? j|), independently for each pair. We study how the convergence of probabilities of first order properties of G(n, p?), can be affected by the behaviour of p? and the strength of the language we use.