A probabilistic extension of intuitionistic logic

We introduce a probabilistic extension of propositional intuitionistic logic. The logic allows making statements such as P_≥sα, with the intended meaning “the probability of truthfulness of α is at least s”. We describe the corresponding class of models, which are Kripke models with a naturally arising notion of probability, and give a sound and complete infinitary axiomatic system. We prove that the logic is decidable.     

A Basis in Semi‐Reduced Form for the Admissible Rules of the Intuitionistic Logic IPC

We study the problem of finding a basis for all rules admissible in the intuitionistic propositional logic IPC. The main result is Theorem 3.1 which gives a basis consisting of all rules in semi‐reduced form satisfying certain specific additional requirements. Using developed technique we also find a basis for rules admissible in the logic of excluded middle law KC.     

An infinitary probability logic for type spaces

Type spaces in the sense of Harsanyi (1967/68) play an important role in the theory of games of incomplete information. They can be considered as the probabilistic analog of Kripke structures. By an infinitary propositional language with additional operators “individual i assigns probability at least α to” and infinitary inference rules, we axiomatize the class of (Harsanyi) type spaces. We prove that our axiom system is strongly sound and strongly complete. To the best of our knowledge, this is the very first strong completeness theorem for a probability logic with σ-additive probabilities. We show this by constructing a canonical type space whose states consist of all maximal consistent sets of formulas. Furthermore, we show that this canonical space is universal (i.e., a terminal object in the category of type spaces) and beliefs complete.     

A relative interpolation theorem for infinitary universal Horn logic and its applications

In this paper we deal with infinitary universal Horn logic both with and without equality. First, we obtain a relative Lyndon-style interpolation theorem. Using this result, we prove a non-standard preservation theorem which contains, as a particular case, a Lyndon-style theorem on surjective homomorphisms in its Makkai-style formulation. Another consequence of the preservation theorem is a theorem on bimorphisms, which, in particular, provides a tool for immediate obtaining characterizations of infinitary universal Horn classes without equality from those with equality. From the theorem on surjective homomorphisms we also derive a non-standard Beth-style preservation theorem that yields a non-standard Beth-style definability theorem, according to which implicit definability of a relation symbol in an infinitary universal Horn theory implies its explicit definability by a conjunction of atomic formulas. We also apply our theorem on surjective homomorphisms, theorem on bimorphisms and definability theorem to algebraic logic for general propositional logic.     

The Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski embedding for infinitary intuitionistic logic and its extensions

The Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski embedding allows to view intuitionistic logic through the lenses of modal logic. In this work, an extension of the modal embedding to infinitary intuitionistic logic is introduced. First, a neighborhood semantics for a family of axiomatically presented infinitary modal logics is given and soundness and completeness are proved via the method of canonical models. The semantics is then exploited to obtain a labelled sequent calculus with good structural properties. Next, soundness and faithfulness of the embedding are established by transfinite induction on the height of derivations: the proof is obtained directly without resorting to non-constructive principles. Finally, the modal embedding is employed in order to relate classical, intuitionistic and modal derivability in infinitary logic extended with axioms.     

Hypersequent calculi for intuitionistic logic with classical atoms

We discuss a propositional logic which combines classical reasoning with constructive reasoning, i.e., intuitionistic logic augmented with a class of propositional variables for which we postulate the decidability property. We call it intuitionistic logic with classical atoms. We introduce two hypersequent calculi for this logic. Our main results presented here are cut-elimination with the subformula property for the calculi. As corollaries, we show decidability, an extended form of the disjunction property, the existence of embedding into an intuitionistic modal logic and a partial form of interpolation.     

Algebraic Characterizations for Universal Fragments of Logic

In this paper we address our efforts to extend the well-known connection in equational logic between equational theories and fully invariant congruences to other–possibly infinitary–logics. In the special case of algebras, this problem has been formerly treated by H. J. Hoehnke [10] and R. W. Quackenbush [14]. Here we show that the connection extends at least up to the universal fragment of logic. Namely, we establish that the concept of (infinitary) universal theory matches the abstract notion of fully invariant system. We also prove that, inside this wide group of theories, the ones which are strict universal Horn correspond to fully invariant closure systems, whereas those which are universal atomic can be characterized as principal fully invariant systems.     

A semantic hierarchy for intuitionistic logic

Brouwer’s views on the foundations of mathematics have inspired the study of intuitionistic logic, including the study of the intuitionistic propositional calculus and its extensions. The theory of these systems has become an independent branch of logic with connections to lattice theory, topology, modal logic, and other areas. This paper aims to present a modern account of semantics for intuitionistic propositional systems. The guiding idea is that of a hierarchy of semantics, organized by increasing generality: from the least general Kripke semantics on through Beth semantics, topological semantics, Dragalin semantics, and finally to the most general algebraic semantics. While the Kripke, topological, and algebraic semantics have been extensively studied, the Beth and Dragalin semantics have received less attention. We bring Beth and Dragalin semantics to the fore, relating them to the concept of a nucleus from pointfree topology, which provides a unifying perspective on the semantic hierarchy.     

Computational adequacy for recursive types in models of intuitionistic set theory

This paper provides a unifying axiomatic account of the interpretation of recursive types that incorporates both domain-theoretic and realizability models as concrete instances. Our approach is to view such models as full subcategories of categorical models of intuitionistic set theory. It is shown that the existence of solutions to recursive domain equations depends upon the strength of the set theory. We observe that the internal set theory of an elementary topos is not strong enough to guarantee their existence. In contrast, as our first main result, we establish that solutions to recursive domain equations do exist when the category of sets is a model of full intuitionistic Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. We then apply this result to obtain a denotational interpretation of FPC, a recursively typed lambda-calculus with call-by-value operational semantics. By exploiting the intuitionistic logic of the ambient model of intuitionistic set theory, we analyse the relationship between operational and denotational semantics. We first prove an “internal” computational adequacy theorem: the model always believes that the operational and denotational notions of termination agree. This allows us to identify, as our second main result, a necessary and sufficient condition for genuine “external” computational adequacy to hold, i.e. for the operational and denotational notions of termination to coincide in the real world. The condition is formulated as a simple property of the internal logic, related to the logical notion of 1-consistency. We provide useful sufficient conditions for establishing that the logical property holds in practice. Finally, we outline how the methods of the paper may be applied to concrete models of FPC. In doing so, we obtain computational adequacy results for an extensive range of realizability and domain-theoretic models.     

Interpreting Intuitionistic Propositional Logic in Terms of Intuitionistic Protothetics

An algebra of sentences of the quite intuitionistic protothetics, that is, an intuitionistic propositional logic with quantifiers augmented by the negation of the excluded middle, is a faithful model of intuitionistic propositional logic.     

Answer set programming in intuitionistic logic

As a demonstration of the flexibility of constructive mathematics, we propose an interpretation of propositional answer set programming (ASP) in terms of intuitionistic proof theory, in particular in terms of simply typed lambda calculus. While connections between ASP and intuitionistic logic are well-known, they usually take the form of characterizations of stable models with the help of some intuitionistic theories represented by specific classes of Kripke models. As such the known results are model-theoretic rather than proof-theoretic. In contrast, we offer an explanation of ASP using constructive proofs.     

Bilattice logic of epistemic actions and knowledge

Baltag, Moss, and Solecki proposed an expansion of classical modal logic, called logic of epistemic actions and knowledge (EAK), in which one can reason about knowledge and change of knowledge. Kurz and Palmigiano showed how duality theory provides a flexible framework for modeling such epistemic changes, allowing one to develop dynamic epistemic logics on a weaker propositional basis than classical logic (for example an intuitionistic basis). In this paper we show how the techniques of Kurz and Palmigiano can be further extended to define and axiomatize a bilattice logic of epistemic actions and knowledge (BEAK). Our propositional basis is a modal expansion of the well-known four-valued logic of Belnap and Dunn, which is a system designed for handling inconsistent as well as potentially conflicting information. These features, we believe, make our framework particularly promising from a computer science perspective.     

Fibered universal algebra for first-order logics

We extend Lawvere-Pitts prop-categories (aka. hyperdoctrines) to develop a general framework for providing fibered algebraic semantics for general first-order logics. This framework includes a natural notion of substitution, which allows first-order logics to be considered as structural closure operators just as propositional logics are in abstract algebraic logic. We then establish an extension of the homomorphism theorem from universal algebra for generalized prop-categories and characterize two natural closure operators on the prop-categorical semantics. The first closes a class of structures (which are interpreted as morphisms of prop-categories) under the satisfaction of their common first-order theory and the second closes a class of prop-categories under their associated first-order consequence. It turns out that these closure operators have characterizations that closely mirror Birkhoff's characterization of the closure of a class of algebras under the satisfaction of their common equational theory and Blok and Jónsson's characterization of closure under equational consequence, respectively. These algebraic characterizations of the first-order closure operators are unique to the prop-categorical semantics. They do not have analogues, for example, in the Tarskian semantics for classical first-order logic. The prop-categories we consider are much more general than traditional intuitionistic prop-categories or triposes (i.e., topos representing indexed partially ordered sets). Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, our results are new, even when restricted to these special classes of prop-categories.     

Interpolation property for bicartesian closed categories

Summary We show that proofs in the intuitionistic propositional logic factor through interpolants-in this way we prove a stronger interpolation property than the usual one which gives only the existence of interpolants.Translating that to categorical terms, we show that Pushouts (bipushouts) of bicartesian closed categories have the interpolation property (Theorem 3.2).     

A note on unbounded metric temporal logic over dense time domains

We investigate the consequences of removing the infinitary axiom and rules from a previously defined proof system for a fragment of propositional metric temporal logic over dense time (see [1]). (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

A proof-search procedure for intuitionistic propositional logic

A sequent root-first proof-search procedure for intuitionistic propositional logic is presented. The procedure is obtained from modified intuitionistic multi-succedent and classical sequent calculi, making use of Glivenko’s Theorem. We prove that a sequent is derivable in a standard intuitionistic multi-succedent calculus if and only if the corresponding prefixed-sequent is derivable in the procedure.     

Natural factors of the Medvedev lattice capturing IPC

Skvortsova showed that there is a factor of the Medvedev lattice which captures intuitionistic propositional logic (IPC). However, her factor is unnatural in the sense that it is constructed in an ad hoc manner. We present a more natural example of such a factor. We also show that the theory of every non-trivial factor of the Medvedev lattice is contained in Jankov’s logic, the deductive closure of IPC plus the weak law of the excluded middle \({\neg p \vee \neg \neg p}\) . This answers a question by Sorbi and Terwijn.     

Tableau method for residuated logic

Residuated logic is a generalization of intuitionistic logic, which does not assume the idempotence of the conjunction operator. Such generalized conjunction operators have proved important in expert systems (in the area of Approximate Reasoning) and in some areas of Theoretical Computer Science. Here we generalize the intuitionistic tableau procedure and prove that this generalized tableau method is sound for the semantics (the class of residuated algebras) of residuated propositional calculus (RPC). Since the axioms of RPC are complete for the semantics we may conclude that whenever a formula 0 is tableau provable, it is deducible in RPC. We present two different approaches for constructing residuated algebras which give us countermodels for some formulas φ which are not tableau provable. The first uses the fact that the theory of residuated algebras is equational, to construct quotients of free algebras. The second uses finite algebras. We end by discussing a number of open questions.