Automated headspace solid-phase dynamic extraction to analyse the volatile fraction of food matrices

High concentration capacity headspace techniques (headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE)) are a bridge between static and dynamic headspace, since they give high concentration factors as does dynamic headspace (D-HS), and are as easy to apply and as reproducible as static headspace (S-HS). In 2000, Chromtech (Idstein, Germany) introduced an inside-needle technique for vapour and liquid sampling, solid-phase dynamic extraction (SPDE), also known as "the magic needle". In SPDE, analytes are concentrated on a 50 microm film of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and activated carbon (10%) coated onto the inside wall of the stainless steel needle (5 cm) of a 2.5 ml gas tight syringe. When SPDE is used for headspace sampling (HS-SPDE), a fixed volume of the headspace of the sample under investigation is sucked up an appropriate number of times with the gas tight syringe and an analyte amount suitable for a reliable GC or GC-MS analysis accumulates in the polymer coating the needle wall. This article describes the preliminary results of both a study on the optimisation of sampling parameters conditioning HS-SPDE recovery, through the analysis of a standard mixture of highly volatile compounds (beta-pinene, isoamyl acetate and linalool) and of the HS-SPDE-GC-MS analyses of aromatic plants and food matrices. This study shows that HS-SPDE is a successful technique for HS-sampling with high concentration capability, good repeatability and intermediate precision, also when it is compared to HS-SPME.     

Headspace sampling of the volatile fraction of vegetable matrices

The evolution of vapour phase sampling of the volatile fraction of vegetable matrices, or of products directly related to them, over the period 1996-2007 is reviewed. High concentration capacity headspace (HCC-HS) and dynamic headspace (D-HS) techniques, that is headspace sampling approaches where the analytes in the vapour phase are concentrated into a sorbent, an adsorbent or a solvent, are considered. Advantages, disadvantages and applications to the vegetable field of several successful techniques based on these approaches are critically presented, including in-tube sorptive extraction (INCAT, HS-SPDE), headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE), solid-phase aroma concentrate extraction (SPACE), large surface area HCC-HS sampling (MESI, MME, HS-STE), headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) and dynamic headspace samplings (D-HS). The developments necessary to overcome some of the limits of the above approaches and techniques are also discussed in view of their application to new fields.     

Impact of phase ratio, polydimethylsiloxane volume and size, and sampling temperature and time on headspace sorptive extraction recovery of some volatile compounds in the essential oil field

This study evaluates concentration capability of headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE) and the influence of sampling conditions on HSSE recovery of an analyte. A standard mixture in water of six high-to-medium volatility analytes (isobutyl methyl ketone, 3-hexanol, isoamyl acetate, 1,8-cineole, linalool and carvone) was used to sample the headspace by HSSE with stir bars coated with different polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) volumes (20, 40, 55 and 110 microL, respectively), headspace vial volumes (8, 21.2, 40, 250 and 1000 mL), sampling temperatures (25, 50 and 75 degrees C) and sampling times (30, 60 and 120 min, and 4, 8 and 16 h). The concentration factors (CFs) of HSSE versus static headspace (S-HS) were also determined. Analytes sampled by the PDMS stir bars were recovered by thermal desorption (TDS) and analysed by capillary GC-MS. This study demonstrates how analyte recovery depends on its physico-chemical characteristics and affinity for PDMS (octanol-water partition coefficients), sampling temperatures (50 degrees C) and times (60 min), the volumes of headspace (40 mL) and of PDMS (in particular, for high volatility analytes). HSSE is also shown to be very effective for trace analysis. The HSSE CFs calculated versus S-HS with a 1000 mL headspace volumes at 25 degrees C during 4 h sampling ranged between 10(3) and 10(4) times for all analytes investigated while the limits of quantitation determined under the same conditions were in the nmol/L range.     

Analysis of volatile secondary metabolites from Colombian Xylopia aromatica (Lamarck) by different extraction and headspace methods and gas chromatography

Hydrodistillation (HD), simultaneous distillation-solvent extraction (SDE), microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (MWHD), and supercritical fluid (CO2) extraction (SFE), were employed to isolate volatile secondary metabolites from Colombian Xylopia aromatica (Lamarck) fruits. Static headspace (S-HS), simultaneous purge and trap (P&T) in solvent (CH2Cl2), and headspace (HS) solid-phase microextraction (SPME) were utilised to obtain volatile fractions from fruits of X. aromatica trees, which grow wild in Central and South America, and are abundant in Colombia. Kováts indices, mass spectra or standard compounds, were used to identify more than 50 individual components in the various volatile fractions. beta-Phellandrene was the main component found in the HD and MWHD essential oils, SDE and SFE extracts (61, 65, 57, and ca. 40%, respectively), followed by beta-myrcene (9.1, 9.3, 8.2 and 5.1%), and alpha-pinene (8.1, 7.3, 8.1 and 5.9%). The main components present in the volatile fractions of the X. aromatica fruits, isolated by S-HS, P&T and HS-SPME were beta-phellandrene (53.8, 35.7 and 39%), beta-myrcene (13.3, 12.3 and 10.1%), p-mentha-1(7),8-diene (7.1, 10.6 and 10.4%), alpha-phellandrene (2.2, 5.0 and 6.4%), and p-cymene (2.2,4.7 and 4.4%), respectively.     

Quantitative analysis of perfumes in talcum powder by using headspace sorptive extraction

Quantitative analysis of perfume dosage in talcum powder has been a challenge due to interference of the matrix and has so far not been widely reported. In this study, headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE) was validated as a solventless sample preparation method for the extraction and enrichment of perfume raw materials from talcum powder. Sample enrichment is performed on a thick film of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) coated onto a magnetic stir bar incorporated in a glass jacket. Sampling is done by placing the PDMS stir bar in the headspace vial by using a holder. The stir bar is then thermally desorbed online with capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The HSSE method is based on the same principles as headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). Nevertheless, a relatively larger amount of extracting phase is coated on the stir bar as compared to SPME. Sample amount and extraction time were optimized in this study. The method has shown good repeatability (with relative standard deviation no higher than 12.5%) and excellent linearity with correlation coefficients above 0.99 for all analytes. The method was also successfully applied in the quantitative analysis of talcum powder spiked with perfume at different dosages.     

样品预处理与实时直接分析质谱的联用技术及应用

近年来,与实时直接分析质谱(DART-MS)相结合的样品预处理技术发展迅速,使得对复杂生物、环境、法医学、食品、个体小生物以及单细胞样品中的分析物进行直接分析成为可能。然而固体基质内部分析物检测困难、痕量分析物检测性能不佳已成为限制DART-MS进一步发展的关键问题。针对这些问题,多年来,研究人员在不同领域对样品预处理与质谱联用进行了多种尝试。该文以固相萃取(SPE)、分散固相萃取(DSPE)、搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE)、固相微萃取(SPME)、机械化学提取(MCE)和微波提取(MAE)等样品预处理技术为例,对不同研究领域中样品预处理技术与DART-MS联用的研究成果进行了综述,并对未来的发展趋势进行了展望。希望该综述能为开发与DART-MS联用的新型样品处理技术提供参考和帮助。     

Comparative studies of the leachate of an industrial landfill by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-nuclear magnetic resonance and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

Nowadays, the need to have a realistic characterization of industrial effluents in the environment has become more and more recognized. A palette of different analytical methods both for sample extraction and instrumental analysis are available today, some older, others introduced more recently. The aim of this research is to compare a number of these techniques. To do this we studied a real leachate from an industrial landfill and carried out chemical analyses for organic pollutants, using different extraction methods based on solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction and different instrumental techniques such as GC-MS, LC-MS, NMR and LC-NMR. Results show the performances of the different techniques, which are complementary.     

微液相色谱分离的在线样品预处理技术--固相微萃取和膜萃取

针对近5年内在分析化学领域出现的微量样品预处理新技术(包括纤维管内固相微萃取、中空膜萃取、动态三相微萃取等)，根据分离机理分成两大类，从原理、仪器装置和应用等方面作一综述。     

Headspace Sorptive Extraction (HSSE) in the Headspace Analysis of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants

A new sampling technique, Headspace Sorptive Extraction (HSSE), is here applied for the first time to the headspace sampling of medicinal and aromatic plants. The analyte partition coefficient between HSSE‐PDMS stir bar and sample headspace (K₁), the concentration factor (CF), the reproducibility, and the minimum recoverable amount were determined by analyzing standard solution of high volatility C₅–C₇ compounds with different polarities and structures (cyclohexane, propyl acetate, hexanal, 1‐hexen‐3‐ol, isoamyl acetate, and 2‐heptanol). Four aromatic and medicinal plants, viz. rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.), sage (Salvia officinalis L.), thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), and valerian (Valeriana officinalis L.) were analyzed by HSSE‐GC with PDMS stir bars, and their concentration capacity was compared with those of S‐HS and HS‐SPME with different fibers. HSSE showed very high concentration capability with both standard and real sample components.     

水产品中有害物质分析样品前处理技术研究进展

水产品含有丰富的蛋白、维生素和多种微量元素,是人们摄取动物性蛋白质的重要来源之一,我国是世界上最大的水产品消费国,其质量安全问题一直备受关注。但水产样品基质复杂,有害物质的含量低,须对其进行分离富集后才能进行检测,传统的液-液萃取、固相萃取和快速固相分散萃取等样品前处理技术在水产品分析中得到广泛应用,同时针对一些挥发性和超痕量有害物质检测时,固相微萃取同样体现出巨大优势。这些样品前处理技术可以有效去除基体对分析对象的干扰,提高检测方法的灵敏度和准确度。根据目标分析物性质的不同,选择合适的样品前处理技术,是水产品中有害物质分析的关键步骤。该文以水产品中有害物的来源不同,将其分为3类:(1)水产品中环境污染物的分析;(2)养殖运输和加工过程中有害物的分析;(3)水产品中生物毒素的分析。以这3类有害物质的分析为主线,综述了近10年水产品中有害物质分析的样品前处理技术,包括液-液萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取、快速固相分散萃取和磁性固相萃取等。此外,还对各种技术的优缺点进行了探讨,并对其未来发展方向进行了展望。     

Chemically modified polymeric sorbents for sample preconcentration

Solid-phase extraction is an attractive alternative in sample preparation because it overcomes many drawbacks of liquid-liquid extraction and makes on-line determination possible by hyphenation with chromatographic techniques. Driven by the need for more effective and more selective sorbents, advances in solid-phase extraction include the development of new materials. This paper describes different types of chemically modified sorbents for the solid-phase extraction of compounds from aqueous samples. Chemical introduction of different functional groups into a polymeric resin improves the efficiency of solid-phase extraction by providing better surface contact with the aqueous samples; also, these sorbents have a greater capacity than the typical solid-phase materials for polar compounds have. The most important new sorbents are the chemically modified resins based on styrene-divinylbenzene copolymers. Preparation of these new sorbents is described, and advantages and drawbacks of off-line procedures and on-line procedures are also discussed. Applications for off-line and on-line chromatographic determinations of polar compounds are presented.     

Recent advances in sample preparation techniques for effective bioanalytical methods

This paper reviews the recent developments in bioanalysis sample preparation techniques and gives an update on basic principles, theory, applications and possibilities for automation, and a comparative discussion on the advantages and limitation of each technique. Conventional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), protein precipitation (PP) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) techniques are now been considered as methods of the past. The last decade has witnessed a rapid development of novel sample preparation techniques in bioanalysis. Developments in SPE techniques such as selective sorbents and in the overall approach to SPE, such as hybrid SPE and molecularly imprinted polymer SPE, have been addressed. Considerable literature has been published in the area of solid-phase micro-extraction and its different versions, e.g. stir bar sorptive extraction, and their application in the development of selective and sensitive bioanalytical methods. Techniques such as dispersive solid-phase extraction, disposable pipette extraction and micro-extraction by packed sorbent offer a variety of extraction phases and provide unique advantages to bioanalytical methods. On-line SPE utilizing column-switching techniques is rapidly gaining acceptance in bioanalytical applications. PP sample preparation techniques such as PP filter plates/tubes offer many advantages like removal of phospholipids and proteins in plasma/serum. Newer approaches to conventional LLE techniques (salting-out LLE) are also covered in this review article.     

Sample treatment in chromatography-based speciation of organometallic pollutants.

Speciation analysis is nowadays performed routinely in many laboratories to control the quality of the environment, food and health. Chemical speciation analyses generally include the study of different oxidation state of elements or individual organometallic compounds. The determination of the different chemical forms of elements is still an analytical challenge, since they are often unstable and concentrations in different matrices of interest are in the microg l(-1) or even in the ng l(-1) range (e.g., estuarine waters) or ng g(-1) in sediments and biological tissues. For this reason, sensitive and selective analytical atomic techniques are being used as available detectors for speciation, generally coupled with chromatography for the time-resolved introduction of analytes into the atomic spectrometer. The complexity of these instrumental couplings has a straightforward consequence on the duration of the analysis, but sample preparation to separate and transfer the chemical species present in the sample into a solution to be accepted readily by a chromatographic column is the more critical step of total analysis, and demands considerable operator skills and time cost. Traditionally, liquid-liquid extraction has been employed for sample treatment with serious disadvantages, such as consumption, disposal and long-term exposure to organic solvent. In addition, they are usually cumbersome and time-consuming. Therefore, the introduction of new reagents such as sodium tetraethylborate for the simultaneous derivatization of several elements has been proposed. Other possibilities are based in the implementation of techniques for efficient and accelerated isolation of species from the sample matrix. This is the case for microwave-assisted extraction, solid-phase extraction and microextraction, supercritical fluid extraction or pressurized liquid extraction, which offer new possibilities in species treatment, and the advantages of a drastic reduction of the extraction time and the embodiment into on-line flow analysis systems. This new generation of treatment techniques constitutes a good choice as fast extraction methods for feasible species-selective analysis of organometallic compounds under the picogram level, that can be used for national regulatory agencies, governmental and industrial quality control laboratories, and consequently, for manufacturers of analytical instrumentation.     

Accelerated solid-phase dynamic extraction of toluene from air

Solid-phase dynamic extraction (SPDE) belongs to the most innovative sample preparation and enrichment techniques. However, there is still a lack of knowledge on the fundamentals of SPDE and its applicability in the field of environmental monitoring. A homemade sampling device is constructed to make a detailed study of SPDE kinetics for toluene extraction. It proved that at least 50 aspirating and dispensing cycles were necessary to obtain toluene equilibration between gas and coating phase. A mechanistic model is proposed to explain that in every dispensing step during SPDE, significant losses of retained analytes (up to 48%) occur due to desorption processes. A new accelerated solid-phase dynamic extraction procedure (ASPDE) has been developed that avoids dispensing stages during extraction. The resulting extraction time proves to be 1.7 min, being a reduction by a factor of 37 compared with the SPDE extraction time. ASPDE proved to have high potential in ambient/indoor air monitoring. The limit of detection for toluene was determined to be 56 ppb(v), i.e. a factor of respectively, 6 and 35 lower than obtained with SPME and conventional headspace sampling with gas syringe.     

石墨烯应用于样品前处理的研究进展

样品前处理技术在样品分析中发挥着越来越重要的作用,而对分析物的富集能力和对样品基体的净化程度主要取决于高效的样品前处理材料,所以发展高性能的样品前处理材料一直是该领域的前沿研究方向。近年来,各类先进材料已经被引入样品前处理领域,发展了多种高性能的萃取材料。由于独特的物理化学性质,石墨烯已在各个研究领域获得广泛关注,在样品前处理领域也发挥着重要作用。基于高的比表面积、大的π电子结构、优异的吸附性能、丰富的官能团和易于化学改性等优点,石墨烯和氧化石墨烯基萃取材料被成功应用于各种样品的前处理,对不同领域中多种类型分析物表现出优异的萃取性能。该论文总结和讨论了近3年来石墨烯材料(石墨烯、氧化石墨烯及其功能化材料)在柱固相萃取、分散固相萃取、磁性固相萃取、搅拌棒萃取、纤维固相微萃取和管内固相微萃取等方面的研究进展。基于多种萃取机理如π-π、静电、疏水、亲水、氢键等相互作用,石墨烯萃取材料能够高效萃取和选择性富集不同类别的目标分析物,如重金属离子、多环芳烃、塑化剂、雌激素、药物分子、农药残留、兽药残留等。基于新型石墨烯萃取材料的各种样品前处理技术与多种检测技术如色谱、质谱、原子吸收光谱等联用,广泛应用于环境监测、食品安全和生化分析等领域。最后,总结了石墨烯在样品前处理领域中存在的问题,并展望了未来的发展趋势。     

Comparison of extraction methods for sampling of low molecular compounds in polymers degraded during recycling

The demand for mechanical recycling of plastic waste results in an increasing amount of recycled polymeric materials available for development of new products. In order for recycled materials to find their way into the material market, high quality is demanded. Thereby, a complete and closed loop of polymeric materials can be achieved successfully. The concept of high quality for recycled plastics imply that besides a pure fraction of e.g. polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP), containing only minor trace amount of foreign plastics, knowledge is required about the type and amount of low molecular weight (LMW) compounds. During long-term use (service-life), products made of polymeric materials will undergo an often very slow degradation where a series of degradation products are formed, in parallel, additives incorporated in the matrix may also degrade. These compounds migrate at various rates to the surrounding environment. The release rate of LMW products from plastics depends on the initiation time of degradation and the degradation mechanisms. For polymers the formation of degradation products may be initiated already during processing, and subsequent use will add products coming from the surrounding environment, e.g. fragrance and aroma compounds from packaging. During recycling of plastics, emissions which contain a series of different LMW compounds may reach the environment leading to unwanted exposure to additives and their degradation residues as well as degradation products of polymers.Several extraction techniques are available for sampling of LMW compounds in polymers before chromatographic analysis. This paper reviews and compares polymer dissolution, accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), super critical fluid extraction (SFE), soxhlet extraction, head-space extraction (HS), head-space solid phase micro extraction (HS-SPME), and head-space stir bar sorptive extraction (HSSE) as appropriate sampling methods for LMW compounds in recycled polymers. Appropriate internal standards useful for these kinds of matrices were selected, which improved the possibility for later quantification. Based on the review of extraction methods, the most promising techniques were tested with industrially recycled samples of HDPE and PP and virgin HDPE and PP for method comparison.     

Determination of pesticide transformation products: A review of extraction and detection methods

Pesticides are widely applied and they can produce a variety of transformation products (TPs), through different pathways and mechanisms. Nowadays there is a growing interest related to the determination of pesticide TPs in several matrices (environmental, food and biological samples), due to these compounds can be more toxic and persistent than parent compounds, and some of them can be used as markers of exposure to different pesticides. Although solid-phase extraction (SPE) is mainly used for the extraction of TPs, alternative techniques such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and liquid-phase extraction (LPE) can be used. These TPs are mainly determined by liquid chromatography (LC) due to the recent developments in this technique, especially when it is coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) detectors, allowing the determination of known and/or unknown TPs. Furthermore, MS is a very valuable tool for the structural elucidation of unknown TPs. This review discusses all phases of analytical procedure, including sample treatment and analysis, indicating the main problems related to the extraction of TPs from several matrices due to their high polarity, as well as the different alternatives found for the simultaneous determination of parent compounds and TPs, using chromatographic techniques coupled to MS detection.     

Optimization of Modern Analytical SPME and SPDE Methods for Determination of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Trans</Emphasis>-2-nonenal in Barley,Malt and Beer

Trans-2-nonenal is an aldehyde contributing to an unpleasant off-flavor and odor of rancid butter in stored beer. The automated solid-phase microextraction technique (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography (GC) and solid-phase dynamic extraction (SPDE) coupled with gas chromatography were optimized and introduced to determine trans-2-nonenal in barley, malt and beer. Five types of SPME fibers coated with different stationary phases (100 μm PDMS, 65 μm PDMS/DVB, 85 μm CAR/PDMS, 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS, 85 μm PA) and two needles (PDMS, PDMS/AC) were compared and tested for their efficiencies in the headspace (HS) SPME and SPDE determination of trans-2-nonenal in barley, malt and beer. The highest extraction efficiency of HS-SPME was achieved with the PDMS/DVB fiber, and addition of 1.5 g of NaCl, extraction time was 20 min at 60 °C. The highest extraction efficiency of HS-SPDE was obtained with the PDMS needle, 15 extraction strokes at 60 °C and addition of 1.5 g of NaCl. Trans-2-nonenal was identified with the method of HS-SPME coupled gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS); the samples were analyzed using the HS-SPME-GC-coupled gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) technique.     

氟固相萃取辅助的生物分子质谱分析新方法

氟固相萃取(Fluorous solid-phase extraction,FSPE)是一种基于全氟化合物之间氟-氟相互作用的固相萃取技术,通过在目标分子上进行氟标签衍生,利用高氟化固相吸附剂实现特异性的分离纯化.这一技术在有机合成、催化,以及化学和生物分离分析等诸多领域应用广泛.近年来,由于氟固相萃取和生物质谱技术之间良好的兼容性,两者联用结合的分析方法受到了研究者的广泛关注.本文在简要介绍氟固相萃取技术原理的基础之上,重点综述了其在生物质谱分析领域中的应用,并对其发展前景进行了展望.