Around splitting and reaping for partitions of ω

We investigate splitting number and reaping number for the structure (ω) ^ω of infinite partitions of ω. We prove that \mathfrakr_d ￡ non(M),non(N),\mathfrakd{\mathfrak{r}_{d}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N}),\mathfrak{d}} and \mathfraks_d 3 \mathfrakb{\mathfrak{s}_{d}\geq\mathfrak{b}} . We also show the consistency results ${\mathfrak{r}_{d} > \mathfrak{b}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{d}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{r}, \mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})}${\mathfrak{r}_{d} > \mathfrak{b}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{d}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{r}, \mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})} and ${\mathfrak{s}_{d} > \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})}${\mathfrak{s}_{d} > \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})} . To prove the consistency \mathfrakr_d < add(M){\mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})} and \mathfraks_d < cof(M){\mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})} we introduce new cardinal invariants \mathfrakr_pair{\mathfrak{r}_{pair}} and \mathfraks_pair{\mathfrak{s}_{pair}} . We also study the relation between \mathfrakr_pair, \mathfraks_pair{\mathfrak{r}_{pair}, \mathfrak{s}_{pair}} and other cardinal invariants. We show that cov(M),cov(N) ￡ \mathfrakr_pair ￡ \mathfraks_d,\mathfrakr{\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{N})\leq\mathfrak{r}_{pair}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{d},\mathfrak{r}} and \mathfraks ￡ \mathfraks_pair ￡ non(M),non(N){\mathfrak{s}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{pair}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N})} .     

On algebraic integrability of Gelfand-Zeitlin fields

We generalize a result of Kostant and Wallach concerning the algebraic integrability of the Gelfand-Zeitlin vector fields to the full set of strongly regular elements in \mathfrakg\mathfrakl \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l} (n, ℂ). We use decomposition classes to stratify the strongly regular set by subvarieties X_D {X_\mathcal{D}} . We construct an étale cover [^(\mathfrakg)]_D {\hat{\mathfrak{g}}}_\mathcal{D} of X_D {X_\mathcal{D}} and show that X_D {X_\mathcal{D}} and [^(\mathfrakg)]_D {\hat{\mathfrak{g}}}_\mathcal{D} are smooth and irreducible. We then use Poisson geometry to lift the Gelfand-Zeitlin vector fields on X_D {X_\mathcal{D}} to Hamiltonian vector fields on [^(\mathfrakg)]_D {\hat{\mathfrak{g}}}_\mathcal{D} and integrate these vector fields to an action of a connected, commutative algebraic group.     

Compact and Loeb Hausdorff spaces in \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$\mathsf {ZF}$\end{document} and the axiom of choice for families of finite sets

Given a set X, $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}(X)}$ denotes the statement: “$[X]^{<\omega }\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$ has a choice set” and $\mathcal {C}_\mathrm{R}\big (\mathbf {2}^{X}\big )$ denotes the family of all closed subsets of the topological space $\mathbf {2}^{X}$ whose definition depends on a finite subset of X. We study the interrelations between the statements $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}(X)},$ $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}([X]^{<\omega })},$ $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin} (F_{n}(X,2))},$ $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}(\mathcal {\wp }(X))}$ and “$\mathcal {C}_\mathrm{R}\big (\mathbf {2}^{X}\big )\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$has a choice set”. We show:

• (i) $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}(X)}$ iff $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}([X]^{<\omega } )}$ iff $\mathcal {C}_\mathrm{R}\big (\mathbf {2}^{X}\big )\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$ has a choice set iff $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}(F_{n}(X,2))}$.
• (ii) $\mathsf {AC}_{\mathrm{fin}}$ ($\mathsf {AC}$ restricted to families of finite sets) iff for every set X, $\mathcal {C}_\mathrm{R}\big (\mathbf {2}^{X}\big )\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$ has a choice set.
• (iii) $\mathsf {AC}_{\mathrm{fin}}$ does not imply “$\mathcal {K}\big (\mathbf {2}^{X}\big )\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$ has a choice set($\mathcal {K}(\mathbf {X})$ is the family of all closed subsets of the space $\mathbf {X}$)
• (iv) $\mathcal {K}(\mathbf {2}^{X})\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$ implies $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}(\mathcal {\wp }(X))}$ but $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}(X)}$ does not imply $\mathsf {AC}^{\mathrm{fin}(\mathcal {\wp }(X))}$.

We also show that “For every setX, “$\mathcal {K}\big (\mathbf {2}^{X}\big )\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$has a choice set” iff “for every setX, $\mathcal {K}\big (\mathbf {[0,1]}^{X}\big )\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$has a choice set” iff “for every product$\mathbf {X}$of finite discrete spaces,$\mathcal {K}(\mathbf {X})\backslash \lbrace \varnothing \rbrace$ has a choice set”.     

A modified BLM approach to quantum affine {\mathfrak{gl}_n}

We introduce a spanning set of Beilinson–Lusztig–MacPherson type, {A(j, r)} _A,j , for affine quantum Schur algebras S_\vartriangle(n, r){{{\boldsymbol{\mathcal S}}_\vartriangle}(n, r)} and construct a linearly independent set {A(j)} _A,j for an associated algebra [^(K)]_\vartriangle(n){{{\boldsymbol{\widehat{\mathcal K}}}_\vartriangle}(n)} . We then establish explicitly some multiplication formulas of simple generators E^\vartriangle_h,h+1(0){E^\vartriangle_{h,h+1}}(\mathbf{0}) by an arbitrary element A(j) in [^(K)]_\vartriangle(n){{\boldsymbol{\widehat{{{\mathcal K}}}}_\vartriangle(n)}} via the corresponding formulas in S_\vartriangle(n, r){{{\boldsymbol{\mathcal S}}_\vartriangle(n, r)}} , and compare these formulas with the multiplication formulas between a simple module and an arbitrary module in the Ringel–Hall algebras \mathfrak H_\vartriangle(n){{{\boldsymbol{\mathfrak H}_\vartriangle(n)}}} associated with cyclic quivers. This allows us to use the triangular relation between monomial and PBW type bases for \mathfrak H_\vartriangle(n){{\boldsymbol{\mathfrak H}}_\vartriangle}(n) established in Deng and Du (Adv Math 191:276–304, 2005) to derive similar triangular relations for S_\vartriangle(n, r){{{\boldsymbol{\mathcal S}}_\vartriangle}(n, r)} and [^(K)]_\vartriangle(n){{\boldsymbol{\widehat{\mathcal K}}}_\vartriangle}(n) . Using these relations, we then show that the subspace \mathfrak A_\vartriangle(n){{{\boldsymbol{\mathfrak A}}_\vartriangle}(n)} of [^(K)]_\vartriangle(n){{\boldsymbol{\widehat{{{\mathcal K}}}}_\vartriangle}(n)} spanned by {A(j)} _A,j contains the quantum enveloping algebra U_\vartriangle(n){{{\mathbf U}_\vartriangle}(n)} of affine type A as a subalgebra. As an application, we prove that, when this construction is applied to quantum Schur algebras S(n,r){\boldsymbol{\mathcal S}(n,r)} , the resulting subspace \mathfrak A_\vartriangle(n){{{{\boldsymbol{\mathfrak A}}_\vartriangle}(n)}} is in fact a subalgebra which is isomorphic to the quantum enveloping algebra of \mathfrakgl_n{\mathfrak{gl}_n} . We conjecture that \mathfrak A_\vartriangle(n){{{{{\boldsymbol{\mathfrak A}}_\vartriangle}(n)}}} is a subalgebra of [^(K)]_\vartriangle(n){{\boldsymbol{\widehat{{{\mathcal K}}}}_\vartriangle}(n)} .     

Complex cycles on algebraic models of smooth manifolds

Every compact smooth manifold M is diffeomorphic to the set X(\mathbbR){X(\mathbb{R})} of real points of a nonsingular projective real algebraic variety X, which is called an algebraic model of M. Each algebraic cycle of codimension k on the complex variety X_\mathbbC=X×_\mathbbR\mathbbC{X_{\mathbb{C}}=X\times_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbb{C}} determines a cohomology class in H^2k(X(\mathbbR);\mathbbD){H^{2k}(X(\mathbb{R});\mathbb{D})} , where \mathbbD{\mathbb{D}} denotes \mathbbZ{\mathbb{Z}} or \mathbbQ{\mathbb{Q}} . We investigate the behavior of such cohomology classes as X runs through the class of algebraic models of M.     

Modular Lie algebras and the Gelfand–Kirillov conjecture

Let ${\mathfrak{g}}Let \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} be a finite dimensional simple Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field \mathbbK\mathbb{K} of characteristic 0. Let \mathfrakg_\mathbbZ{\mathfrak{g}}_{{\mathbb{Z}}} be a Chevalley ℤ-form of \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} and \mathfrakg_\Bbbk=\mathfrakg_\mathbbZ?_\mathbbZ\Bbbk{\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk}={\mathfrak{g}}_{{\mathbb{Z}}}\otimes _{{\mathbb{Z}}}\Bbbk, where \Bbbk\Bbbk is the algebraic closure of  \mathbbF_p{\mathbb{F}}_{p}. Let G_\BbbkG_{\Bbbk} be a simple, simply connected algebraic \Bbbk\Bbbk-group with \operatornameLie(G_\Bbbk)=\mathfrakg_\Bbbk\operatorname{Lie}(G_{\Bbbk})={\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk}. In this paper, we apply recent results of Rudolf Tange on the fraction field of the centre of the universal enveloping algebra U(\mathfrakg_\Bbbk)U({\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk}) to show that if the Gelfand–Kirillov conjecture (from 1966) holds for \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}}, then for all p≫0 the field of rational functions \Bbbk (\mathfrakg_\Bbbk)\Bbbk ({\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk}) is purely transcendental over its subfield \Bbbk(\mathfrakg_\Bbbk)^G_\Bbbk\Bbbk({\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk})^{G_{\Bbbk}}. Very recently, it was proved by Colliot-Thélène, Kunyavskiĭ, Popov, and Reichstein that the field of rational functions \mathbbK(\mathfrakg){\mathbb{K}}({\mathfrak{g}}) is not purely transcendental over its subfield \mathbbK(\mathfrakg)^\mathfrakg{\mathbb{K}}({\mathfrak{g}})^{\mathfrak{g}} if \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} is of type B _n , n≥3, D _n , n≥4, E₆, E₇, E₈ or F₄. We prove a modular version of this result (valid for p≫0) and use it to show that, in characteristic 0, the Gelfand–Kirillov conjecture fails for the simple Lie algebras of the above types. In other words, if \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} is of type B _n , n≥3, D _n , n≥4, E₆, E₇, E₈ or F₄, then the Lie field of \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} is more complicated than expected.     

On effective σ‐boundedness and σ‐compactness

We prove several dichotomy theorems which extend some known results on σ‐bounded and σ‐compact pointsets. In particular we show that, given a finite number of $\Delta ^{1}_{1}$ equivalence relations $\mathrel {\mathsf {F}}_1,\dots ,\mathrel {\mathsf {F}}_n$, any $\Sigma ^{1}_{1}$ set A of the Baire space either is covered by compact $\Delta ^{1}_{1}$ sets and lightface $\Delta ^{1}_{1}$ equivalence classes of the relations $\mathrel {\mathsf {F}}_i$, or A contains a superperfect subset which is pairwise $\mathrel {\mathsf {F}}_i$‐inequivalent for all i = 1, …, n. Further generalizations to $\Sigma ^{1}_{2}$ sets A are obtained.     

Skew representations of twisted Yangians

Analogs of the classical Sylvester theorem have been known for matrices with entries in noncommutative algebras including the quantized algebra of functions on GL _N and the Yangian for $$ \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}_{{N}} $$ . We prove a version of this theorem for the twisted Yangians $$ {\text{Y(}}\mathfrak{g}_{N} {\text{)}} $$associated with the orthogonal and symplectic Lie algebras $$ \mathfrak{g}_{N} = \mathfrak{o}_{N} {\text{ or }}\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{p}_{N} $$. This gives rise to representations of the twisted Yangian $$ {\text{Y}}{\left( {\mathfrak{g}_{{N - M}} } \right)} $$ on the space of homomorphisms $$ {\text{Hom}}_{{\mathfrak{g}_{M} }} {\left( {W,V} \right)} $$, where W and V are finite-dimensional irreducible modules over $$ \mathfrak{g}_{{M}} {\text{ and }}\mathfrak{g}_{{N}} $$, respectively. In the symplectic case these representations turn out to be irreducible and we identify them by calculating the corresponding Drinfeld polynomials.We also apply the quantum Sylvester theorem to realize the twisted Yangian as a projective limit of certain centralizers in universal enveloping algebras.     

Localization and Locality for Resistance Forms

For a resistance form ${(X, \mathcal{D}(\varepsilon),\varepsilon)}For a resistance form (X, D(e),e){(X, \mathcal{D}(\varepsilon),\varepsilon)} and a point x₀ ? X{x_0 \in X} as boundary, on the space X₀:=X \{x₀}{X_0:=X {\setminus}\{x_0\}} we consider the Dirichlet space D_x0:={f ? D(e) | f(x₀)=0}{\mathcal{D}_{x_0}:=\{f\in\mathcal{D}(\varepsilon)\, |\, f(x_0)=0\}} and we develop a good potential theory. For any finely open subset D of X ₀ we consider a localized resistance form (D_{X0 \ D},e_D{\mathcal{D}_{X_0 {\setminus} D},\varepsilon_{D}}) where D_{X0 \ D}:={f ? D_x0 | f=0{\mathcal{D}_{X_0 {\setminus} D}:=\{f\in\mathcal{D}_{x_0}\, |\, f=0} on X₀ \ D}, e_D(f,g):=e(f,g){X_0 {\setminus} D\},\, \varepsilon_D(f,g):=\varepsilon(f,g)} for all f,g ? D_{X0 \ D}{f,g\in\mathcal{D}_{X_0 {\setminus} D}}. The main result is the equivalence between the local property of the resistance form and the sheaf property for the excessive elements on finely open sets.     

Pontrjagin–Thom maps and the homology of the moduli stack of stable curves

We study the singular homology (with field coefficients) of the moduli stack [`(\mathfrakM)]<sub>g, n</sub>{\overline{\mathfrak{M}}_{g, n}} of stable n-pointed complex curves of genus g. Each irreducible boundary component of [`(\mathfrakM)]_{g, n}{\overline{\mathfrak{M}}_{g, n}} determines via the Pontrjagin–Thom construction a map from [`(\mathfrakM)]<sub>g, n</sub>{\overline{\mathfrak{M}}_{g, n}} to a certain infinite loop space whose homology is well understood. We show that these maps are surjective on homology in a range of degrees proportional to the genus. This detects many new torsion classes in the homology of [`(\mathfrakM)]_{g, n}{\overline{\mathfrak{M}}_{g, n}}.     

Skew representations of twisted Yangians

Analogs of the classical Sylvester theorem have been known for matrices with entries in noncommutative algebras including the quantized algebra of functions on GL_N and the Yangian for $$ \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}_{{N}} $$ . We prove a version of this theorem for the twisted Yangians $$ {\text{Y(}}\mathfrak{g}_{N} {\text{)}} $$associated with the orthogonal and symplectic Lie algebras $$ \mathfrak{g}_{N} = \mathfrak{o}_{N} {\text{ or }}\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{p}_{N} $$. This gives rise to representations of the twisted Yangian $$ {\text{Y}}{\left( {\mathfrak{g}_{{N - M}} } \right)} $$ on the space of homomorphisms $$ {\text{Hom}}_{{\mathfrak{g}_{M} }} {\left( {W,V} \right)} $$, where W and V are finite-dimensional irreducible modules over $$ \mathfrak{g}_{{M}} {\text{ and }}\mathfrak{g}_{{N}} $$, respectively. In the symplectic case these representations turn out to be irreducible and we identify them by calculating the corresponding Drinfeld polynomials.We also apply the quantum Sylvester theorem to realize the twisted Yangian as a projective limit of certain centralizers in universal enveloping algebras.     

On the strong laws of large numbers for double arrays of random variables in convex combination spaces

Let \mathfrak X{\mathfrak {X}} be a convex combination space as defined by Terán and Molchanov [13]. By using their definition of mathematical expectation of an \mathfrak X{\mathfrak {X}}-valued random variable, we state several new variants of strong laws of large numbers for double arrays of integrable \mathfrak X{\mathfrak {X}}-valued random variables under various assumptions. Some related results in the literature are extended.     

Revisiting the Farey AF Algebra

In a recent paper, F. Boca investigates the AF algebra \mathfrakA{{\mathfrak{A}}} associated with the Farey-Stern-Brocot sequence. We show that \mathfrakA{{\mathfrak{A}}} coincides with the AF algebra \mathfrakM₁{{\mathfrak{M_{1}}}} introduced by the present author in 1988. As proved in that paper (Adv. Math., vol.68.1), the K ₀-group of \mathfrakA{\mathfrak{A}} is the lattice-ordered abelian group M₁{\mathcal{M}_{1}} of piecewise linear functions on the unit interval, each piece having integer coefficients, with the constant 1 as the distinguished order unit. Using the elementary properties of M₁{\mathcal{M}_{1}} we can give short proofs of several results in Boca’s paper. We also prove many new results: among others, \mathfrakA{{\mathfrak{A}}} is a *-subalgebra of Glimm universal algebra, tracial states of \mathfrakA{{\mathfrak{A}}} are in one-one correspondence with Borel probability measures on the unit real interval, all primitive ideals of \mathfrakA{{\mathfrak{A}}} are essential. We describe the automorphism group of \mathfrakA{{\mathfrak{A}}} . For every primitive ideal I of \mathfrakA{{{\mathfrak{A}}}} we compute K ₀(I) and K₀(\mathfrakA/I){{K_{0}(\mathfrak{A}/I)}}.     

On the spectrum of lamplighter groups and percolation clusters

Let be a finitely generated group and X its Cayley graph with respect to a finite, symmetric generating set S. Furthermore, let be a finite group and the lamplighter group (wreath product) over with group of “lamps” . We show that the spectral measure (Plancherel measure) of any symmetric “switch–walk–switch” random walk on coincides with the expected spectral measure (integrated density of states) of the random walk with absorbing boundary on the cluster of the group identity for Bernoulli site percolation on X with parameter . The return probabilities of the lamplighter random walk coincide with the expected (annealed) return probabilities on the percolation cluster. In particular, if the clusters of percolation with parameter are almost surely finite then the spectrum of the lamplighter group is pure point. This generalizes results of Grigorchuk and Żuk, resp. Dicks and Schick regarding the case when is infinite cyclic. Analogous results relate bond percolation with another lamplighter random walk. In general, the integrated density of states of site (or bond) percolation with arbitrary parameter is always related with the Plancherel measure of a convolution operator by a signed measure on , where or another suitable group. M. Neuhauser’s research supported by the Marie-Curie Excellence Grant MEXT-CT-2004-517154. The research of W. Woess was partially supported by Austrian Science Fund (FWF) P18703-N18.     

Hausdorff dimension of the contours of symmetric additive Lévy processes

Let X ₁, ..., X _N denote N independent, symmetric Lévy processes on R ^d . The corresponding additive Lévy process is defined as the following N-parameter random field on R ^d : Khoshnevisan and Xiao (Ann Probab 30(1):62–100, 2002) have found a necessary and sufficient condition for the zero-set of to be non-trivial with positive probability. They also provide bounds for the Hausdorff dimension of which hold with positive probability in the case that can be non-void. Here we prove that the Hausdorff dimension of is a constant almost surely on the event . Moreover, we derive a formula for the said constant. This portion of our work extends the well known formulas of Horowitz (Israel J Math 6:176–182, 1968) and Hawkes (J Lond Math Soc 8:517–525, 1974) both of which hold for one-parameter Lévy processes. More generally, we prove that for every nonrandom Borel set F in (0,∞) ^N , the Hausdorff dimension of is a constant almost surely on the event . This constant is computed explicitly in many cases. The research of N.-R. S. was supported by a grant from the Taiwan NSC.     

Some results on the annihilators and attached primes of local cohomology modules

Let \((R, \mathfrak {m})\) be a local ring and M a finitely generated R-module. It is shown that if M is relative Cohen–Macaulay with respect to an ideal \(\mathfrak {a}\) of R, then \({\text {Ann}}_R(H_{\mathfrak {a}}^{{\text {cd}}(\mathfrak {a}, M)}(M))={\text {Ann}}_RM/L={\text {Ann}}_RM\) and \({\text {Ass}}_R (R/{\text {Ann}}_RM)\subseteq \{\mathfrak {p}\in {\text {Ass}}_R M|\,\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, R/\mathfrak {p})={\text {cd}}(\mathfrak {a}, M)\},\) where L is the largest submodule of M such that \(\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, L)< \mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, M)\). We also show that if \(H^{\dim M}_{\mathfrak {a}}(M)=0\), then \({\text {Att}}_R(H^{\dim M-1}_{\mathfrak {a}}(M))= \{\mathfrak {p}\in {\text {Supp}}(M)|\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, R/\mathfrak {p})=\dim M-1\},\) and so the attached primes of \(H^{\dim M-1}_{\mathfrak {a}}(M)\) depend only on \({\text {Supp}}(M)\). Finally, we prove that if M is an arbitrary module (not necessarily finitely generated) over a Noetherian ring R with \(\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, M)=\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, R/{\text {Ann}}_RM)\), then \({\text {Att}}_R(H^{\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, M)}_{\mathfrak {a}}(M))\subseteq \{\mathfrak {p}\in {\text {V}}({\text {Ann}}_RM)|\,\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, R/\mathfrak {p})=\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, M)\}.\) As a consequence of this, it is shown that if \(\dim M=\dim R\), then \({\text {Att}}_R(H^{\dim M}_{\mathfrak {a}}(M))\subseteq \{\mathfrak {p}\in {\text {Ass}}_R M|\mathrm{cd}(\mathfrak {a}, R/\mathfrak {p})=\dim M\}\).     

Extending the Torelli map to toroidal compactifications of Siegel space

It has been known since the 1970s that the Torelli map M  _g →A  _g , associating to a smooth curve its Jacobian, extends to a regular map from the Deligne–Mumford compactification [`(\operatorname M)]<sub>g</sub>\overline {\operatorname {M}}_{g} to the 2nd Voronoi compactification [`(\operatorname A)]_g^vor\overline {\operatorname {A}}_{g}^{\mathrm {vor}}. We prove that the extended Torelli map to the perfect cone (1st Voronoi) compactification [`(\operatorname A)]<sub>g</sub><sup>perf</sup>\overline {\operatorname {A}}_{g}^{\mathrm {perf}} is also regular, and moreover [`(\operatorname A)]_g^vor\overline {\operatorname {A}}_{g}^{\mathrm {vor}} and [`(\operatorname A)]<sub>g</sub><sup>perf</sup>\overline {\operatorname {A}}_{g}^{\mathrm {perf}} share a common Zariski open neighborhood of the image of [`(\operatorname M)]_g\overline {\operatorname {M}}_{g}. We also show that the map to the Igusa monoidal transform (central cone compactification) is not regular for g≥9; this disproves a 1973 conjecture of Namikawa.