On relations between DEA-risk models and stochastic dominance efficiency tests

In this paper, several concepts of portfolio efficiency testing are compared, based either on data envelopment analysis (DEA) or the second-order stochastic dominance (SSD) relation: constant return to scale DEA models, variable return to scale (VRS) DEA models, diversification-consistent DEA models, pairwise SSD efficiency tests, convex SSD efficiency tests and full SSD portfolio efficiency tests. Especially, the equivalence between VRS DEA model with binary weights and the SSD pairwise efficiency test is proved. DEA models equivalent to convex SSD efficiency tests and full SSD portfolio efficiency tests are also formulated. In the empirical application, the efficiency testing of 48 US representative industry portfolios using all considered DEA models and SSD tests is presented. The obtained efficiency sets are compared. A special attention is paid to the case of small number of the inputs and outputs. It is empirically shown that DEA models equivalent either to the convex SSD test or to the SSD portfolio efficiency test work well even with quite small number of inputs and outputs. However, the reduced VRS DEA model with binary weights is not able to identify all the pairwise SSD efficient portfolios.     

DEA cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale

Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been developed under the assumption of constant returns to scale (CRS), and no valid attempts have been made to apply the cross-efficiency concept to the variable returns to scale (VRS) condition. This is due to the fact that negative VRS cross-efficiency arises for some decision-making units (DMUs). Since there exist many instances that require the use of the VRS DEA model, it is imperative to develop cross-efficiency measures under VRS. We show that negative VRS cross-efficiency is related to free production of outputs. We offer a geometric interpretation of the relationship between the CRS and VRS DEA models. We show that each DMU, via solving the VRS model, seeks an optimal bundle of weights with which its CRS-efficiency score, measured under a translated Cartesian coordinate system, is maximized. We propose that VRS cross-efficiency evaluation should be done via a series of CRS models under translated Cartesian coordinate systems. The current study offers a valid cross-efficiency approach under the assumption of VRS—one of the most common assumptions in performance evaluation done by DEA.     

DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units

The purpose of this study is to develop a new method which provides for given inputs and outputs the best common weights for all the units that discriminate optimally between the efficient and inefficient units as pregiven by the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), in order to rank all the units on the same scale. This new method, Discriminant Data Envelopment Analysis of Ratios (DR/DEA), presents a further post-optimality analysis of DEA for organizational units when their multiple inputs and outputs are given. We construct the ratio between the composite output and the composite input, where their common weights are computed by a new non-linear optimization of goodness of separation between the two pregiven groups. A practical use of DR/DEA is that the common weights may be utilized for ranking the units on a unified scale. DR/DEA is a new use of a two-group discriminant criterion that has been presented here for ratios, rather than the traditional discriminant analysis which applies to a linear function. Moreover, non-parametric statistical tests are employed to verify the consistency between the classification from DEA (efficient and inefficient units) and the post-classification as generated by DR/DEA.     

Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models

In the data envelopment analysis (DEA) efficiency literature, qualitative characterizations of returns to scale (increasing, constant, or decreasing) are most common. In economics it is standard to use the scale elasticity as a quantification of scale properties for a production function representing efficient operations. Our contributions are to review DEA practices, apply the concept of scale elasticity from economic multi-output production theory to DEA piecewise linear frontier production functions, and develop formulas for scale elasticity for radial projections of inefficient observations in the relative interior of fully dimensional facets. The formulas are applied to both constructed and real data and show the differences between scale elasticities for the two valid projections (input and output orientations). Instead of getting qualitative measures of returns to scale only as was done earlier in the DEA literature, we now get a quantitative range of scale elasticity values providing more information to policy-makers.     

Technical efficiency and economies of scale: A non-parametric analysis of REIT operating efficiency

This study measures technical efficiency and economies of scale for real estate investment trusts (REITs) by employing data envelopment analysis (DEA), a linear-programming technique. Using data from the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREITs) for the years 1992–1996, we find that REITs are technically inefficient, and the inefficiencies are a result of both poor input utilization and failure to operate at constant returns to scale. With respect to scale inefficiency, most REITs are operating at increasing returns to scale, suggesting that REITs could improve performance through expansion. Moreover, we employ regression analysis to determine what characteristics influence the efficiency measures obtained. The results show that internal REIT management is positively related to all measures of efficiency. Increasing leverage is negatively related to REIT input utilization. Finally, increasing REIT diversification across property types enhances scale efficiency (SE) but reduces input usage efficiency.     

具有包容关系的结构异质DEA效率评价方法

指标结构同质是数据包络分析（DEA）方法的基本假设之一;然而,现实问题的复杂性使得该假设常常难以完全被满足.针对具有包容关系的产出结构异质问题,通过解析决策单元（DMU）之间生产结构的内在关系来构建一种分阶段的DEA效率评价方法.该方法充分考虑了不同结构DMU的主观偏好,较好地规避了传统DEA方法在结构异质DMU效率评价过程中的不公平性.随后,该方法分别被拓展至投入结构异质和多重结构异质的情境中.最后,通过两个算例来说明本文方法的有效性与实用性.     

Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach

A characteristic of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is to allow individual decision-making units (DMUs) to select the factor weights that are the most advantageous for them in calculating their efficiency scores. This flexibility in selecting the weights, on the other hand, deters the comparison among DMUs on a common base. In order to rank all the DMUs on the same scale, this paper proposes a compromise solution approach for generating common weights under the DEA framework. The efficiency scores calculated from the standard DEA model are regarded as the ideal solution for the DMUs to achieve. A common set of weights which produces the vector of efficiency scores for the DMUs closest to the ideal solution is sought. Based on the generalized measure of distance, a family of efficiency scores called ‘compromise solutions’ can be derived. The compromise solutions have the properties of unique solution and Pareto optimality not enjoyed by the solutions derived from the existing methods of common weights. An example of forest management illustrates that the compromise solution approach is able to generate a common set of weights, which not only differentiates efficient DMUs but also detects abnormal efficiency scores on a common base.     

The relationship between the efficiency of orthopedic wards and the socio-economic status of their patients

The purpose of this paper is to study the effect of the socio-economic status of patients on the efficiency of orthopedic wards in acute hospitals in Israel (20 hospitals), from the viewpoint of the regulator—Israel Ministry of Health. At the first stage, data envelopment analysis is used with two inputs, and three outputs, where one output is undesirable—“number of deaths”—which also reflects the quality of the health services. At the second stage, various nonparametric tests are utilized to test the relationship between the socio-economic status of patients and the efficiency. As by-product DEA provides benchmark analysis, which indicates the peers of each inefficient ward, and the I/O improvements are needed for achieving efficiency. Two versions of DEA were used: the output oriented version (variable returns to scale), and the non-oriented version (Additive). Further analysis provides comparison of the results with other simple efficiency measures. We also compare between the efficiency from the regulator viewpoint and the hospitals’ viewpoint.     

Experimental evidence on robustness of data envelopment analysis

There is an on-going debate about variable selection in data envelopment analysis (DEA) as there are no diagnostic checks for model misspecification. This paper contributes to this debate by investigating the sensitivity of DEA efficiency estimates to including inappropriate and/or omitting several important variables in a large-sample DEA model. Data are simulated from constant, increasing and decreasing returns-to-scale (RS) Cobb–Douglas production processes. For constant and decreasing RS processes with irrelevant inputs, DEA tends to overestimate efficiency in almost all production units. When relevant variables are omitted, variable RS appears to be a safer option. The correct RS specification is vital when the DEA model includes irrelevant variables. The effect of omission of relevant inputs on individual production unit efficiency is more adverse compared to the inclusion of irrelevant ones.     

Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs

This paper develops a DEA (data envelopment analysis) model to accommodate competition over outputs. In the proposed model, the total output of all decision making units (DMUs) is fixed, and DMUs compete with each other to maximize their self-rated DEA efficiency score. In the presence of competition over outputs, the best-practice frontier deviates from the classical DEA frontier. We also compute the efficiency scores using the proposed fixed sum output DEA (FSODEA) models, and discuss the competition strategy selection rule. The model is illustrated using a hypothetical data set under the constant returns to scale assumption and medal data from the 2000 Sydney Olympics under the variable returns to scale assumption.     

Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA

The paper proposes methodology for resource allocation and target setting based on DEA (data envelopment analysis). It deals with organization can be modeled as consisting of several production units, each of which has parallel production lines. The previous studies in the DEA literature only deal with reallocating/allocating organizational resources to production units and set targets for them. In their researches, the production unit is treated as a black box. In such circumstances, how to arrange the production at production unit level is not clear. This paper serves to generate resource allocation and target setting plan for each production unit by opening the black box. The proposed model exploits production information of production lines in generating production plans. The resulting plan has following characteristics: (1) the performance of each production lines are evaluated under common weights; (2) the weights chose for evaluation keep the efficiency of the entire unit not worse off; (3) the worst behaved production line in the production unit under evaluation are improved as much as possible. Finally, the real data of a production system extracted from extant literature are used to demonstrate the proposed method.     

Two-dimensional efficiency decomposition to measure the demand effect in productivity analysis

This paper proposes a two-dimensional efficiency decomposition (2DED) of profitability for a production system to account for the demand effect observed in productivity analysis. The first dimension identifies four components of efficiency: capacity design, demand generation, operations, and demand consumption, using Network Data Envelopment Analysis (Network DEA). The second dimension decomposes the efficiency measures and integrates them into a profitability efficiency framework. Thus, each component’s profitability change can be analyzed based on technical efficiency change, scale efficiency change and allocative efficiency change. An empirical study based on data from 2006 to 2008 for the US airline industry finds that the regress of productivity is mainly caused by a demand fluctuation in 2007-2008 rather than technical regression in production capabilities.     

Linear programming solutions and distance functions under a constant returns to scale technology

In this paper, we investigate the various relationships among the linear programming solutions of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models under a constant returns to scale technology. We derive the analytical relationships among the efficiency measures and the activity variables for four separate models: the input-based, the output-based, the hyperbolic, and the proportional distance functions. We apply our results in order to derive a test of consistency that can be used in assessing the returns to scale among differing DEA models.     

链式网络DEA模型

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价决策单元(DMU)相对有效性的一种工具,现已得到广泛的应用.传统的DEA不考虑系统内部结构,而是将系统作为一个"黑箱"来度量效率.针对多阶段网络结构提出一个新的网络DEA模型—链式网络DEA模型.研究网络决策单元的网络DEA有效性及各个阶段的弱DEA有效性之间的关系,给出了网络DEA有效的充分必要条件.若网络决策单元不是网络DEA有效的,根据模型可以指出系统在哪些阶段是无效的.     

Dominance stochastic models in data envelopment analysis

In this paper stochastic models in data envelopment analysis (DEA) are developed by taking into account the possibility of random variations in input-output data, and dominance structures on the DEA envelopment side are used to incorporate the modelbuilder's preferences and to discriminate efficiencies among decision making units (DMUs). The efficiency measure for a DMU is defined via joint dominantly probabilistic comparisons of inputs and outputs with other DMUs and can be characterized by solving a chance constrained programming problem. Deterministic equivalents are obtained for multivariate symmetric random errors and for a single random factor in the production relationships. The goal programming technique is utilized in deriving linear deterministic equivalents and their dual forms. The relationship between the general stochastic DEA models and the conventional DEA models is also discussed.     

DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has proved to be an excellent approach for measuring performance of decision making units (DMUs) that use multiple inputs to generate multiple outputs. In many real world scenarios, DMUs have a two-stage network process with shared input resources used in both stages of operations. For example, in hospital operations, some of the input resources such as equipment, personnel, and information technology are used in the first stage to generate medical record to track treatments, tests, drug dosages, and costs. The same set of resources used by first stage activities are used to generate the second-stage patient services. Patient services also use the services generated by the first stage operations of housekeeping, medical records, and laundry. These DMUs have not only inputs and outputs, but also intermediate measures that exist in-between the two-stage operations. The distinguishing characteristic is that some of the inputs to the first stage are shared by both the first and second stage, but some of the shared inputs cannot be conveniently split up and allocated to the operations of the two stages. Recognizing this distinction is critical for these types of DEA applications because measuring the efficiency of the production for first-stage outputs can be misleading and can understate the efficiency if DEA fails to consider that some of the inputs generate other second-stage outputs. The current paper develops a set of DEA models for measuring the performance of two-stage network processes with non splittable shared inputs. An additive efficiency decomposition for the two-stage network process is presented. The models are developed under the assumption of variable returns to scale (VRS), but can be readily applied under the assumption of constant returns to scale (CRS). An application is provided.     

外源投入型两阶段制造系统网络DEA效率分析研究

制造过程评价是改善制造系统效率的重要一环,传统的评价方法将每个制造系统决策单元视为黑箱来研究整体效率,忽略了中间产品转化信息及投入要素在各子过程中的配置信息。针对两阶段(第二阶段有外源性新投入)制造系统的效率评估问题,分别在固定规模报酬和可变规模报酬假设下,充分利用制造系统中间产品的转化及外源投入要素的配置信息,建立了制造系统网络DEA效率测度及分解模型,建模方法遵循客观评价原则,无需事先主观确定子效率和系统效率之间的组合关系。并将其应用于钢铁制造系统效率测度与分解,研究结果表明该方法能够挖掘决策单元内部子单元的效率情况,帮助决策者发现复杂制造过程非有效的根源,为复杂制造过程的整体效率测度及分解提供了有效的分析方法。     

In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) measures the production performance of decision-making units (DMUs) which consume multiple inputs and produce multiple outputs. Although DEA has become a very popular method of performance measure, it still suffers from some shortcomings. For instance, one of its drawbacks is that multiple solutions exist in the linear programming solutions of efficient DMUs. The obtained weight set is just one of the many optimal weight sets that are available. Then why use this weight set instead of the others especially when this weight set is used for cross-evaluation? Another weakness of DEA is that extremely diverse or unusual values of some input or output weights might be obtained for DMUs under assessment. Zero input and output weights are not uncommon in DEA. The main objective of this paper is to develop a new methodology which applies discriminant analysis, super-efficiency DEA model and mixed-integer linear programming to choose suitable weight sets to be used in computing cross-evaluation. An advantage of this new method is that each obtained weight set can reflect the relative strengths of the efficient DMU under consideration. Moreover, the method also attempts to preserve the original classificatory result of DEA, and in addition this method produces much less zero weights than DEA in our computational results.     

Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information

This work exploits links between Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), with decision making units (DMUs) playing the role of decision alternatives. A novel perspective is suggested on the use of the additive DEA model in order to overcome some of its shortcomings, using concepts from multiattribute utility models with imprecise information. The underlying idea is to convert input and output factors into utility functions that are aggregated using a weighted sum (additive model of multiattribute utility theory), and then let each DMU choose the weights associated with these functions that minimize the difference of utility to the best DMU. The resulting additive DEA model with oriented projections has a clear rationale for its efficiency measures, and allows meaningful introduction of constraints on factor weights.     

Incorporating performance measures with target levels in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a technique for evaluating relative efficiencies of peer decision making units (DMUs) which have multiple performance measures. These performance measures have to be classified as either inputs or outputs in DEA. DEA assumes that higher output levels and/or lower input levels indicate better performance. This study is motivated by the fact that there are performance measures (or factors) that cannot be classified as an input or output, because they have target levels with which all DMUs strive to achieve in order to attain the best practice, and any deviations from the target levels are not desirable and may indicate inefficiency. We show how such performance measures with target levels can be incorporated in DEA. We formulate a new production possibility set by extending the standard DEA production possibility set under variable returns-to-scale assumption based on a set of axiomatic properties postulated to suit the case of targeted factors. We develop three efficiency measures by extending the standard radial, slacks-based, and Nerlove–Luenberger measures. We illustrate the proposed model and efficiency measures by applying them to the efficiency evaluation of 36 US universities.