A 116-Nuclear Metallosupramolecular Cage-of-Cage Showing Multistep Single-Crystal-to-Single-Crystal Transformation

Here a unique single-crystal-to-single-crystal (SCSC) transformation of a 116-nuclear Au^I₇₂Cd^II₄₀Na^I₄ cage-of-cage ( 2 _CdNa) is reported, which was created from a trigold(I) metalloligand with d -penicillamine by way of a 9-nuclear Au^I₆Cd^II₃ cage ( 1 ). Cage-of-cage 2 _CdNa is composed of 12 cages of 1 that are linked by 4 Cd²⁺ and 4 Na⁺ ions, with its surface being covered by 12 NO₃⁻ ions to form a discrete, spherical molecule with a diameter ca. 4.7 nm. In crystal 2 _CdNa, the cage-of-cage molecules are packed in a cubic lattice with a huge cell volume of ca. 4.5×10⁵ ų_, so as to have large interstices with diameters of more than 3 nm. Upon soaking crystals 2 _CdNa in aqueous Cu(NO₃)₂, all Cd²⁺ and Na⁺ were quickly exchanged by Cu²⁺ to produce an analogous Au^I₇₂Cu^II₄₄ cage-of-cage ( 2 _Cu) in a SCSC manner. Prolonged soaking led to the SCSC transformation to another supramolecular structure ( 2′ _Cu) consisting of 152-nuclear Au^I₇₂Cu^II₈₀ cage-of-cages that are alternately H-bonded with the Au^I₇₂Cu^II₄₄ cage-of-cages. 2′ _Cu showed the accommodation of MoO₄²⁻ and the conversion of MoO₄²⁻ to β-Mo₈O₂₆⁴⁻ in the crystal, with retention of single-crystallinity.     

金属组学在急性心肌梗死早期诊断的应用

为探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者血清中K⁺、Na⁺、Ca²⁺、Fe²⁺、Mg²⁺含量变化,并研究其与心肌梗死患者之间的关系。选取2022年5月至2023年2月收治的AMI患者37例,同时选取健康体检者35例作为对照组。依据入院时或体检时收集的抽血样本进行临床生化分析,比较两组间血清K⁺、Na⁺、Ca²⁺、Fe²⁺、Mg²⁺含量,采用判别方程、主成分分析法(PCA),判断分析哪种金属离子对于心肌梗死的诊断价值大。结果表明,AMI患者的血清中Ca²⁺和Fe²⁺含量低于健康对照组,差异具有统计学意义。基于血钙、铁水平两组具有显著性差异,以它们为基础进行判别分析,获得判别函数式。将血清中K⁺、Na⁺、Ca²⁺、Fe²⁺、Mg²⁺     

Functionalization of a cyclo‐P5 Ligand by Main‐Group Element Nucleophiles

Unprecedented functionalized products with an η⁴‐P₅ ring are obtained by the reaction of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] ( 1 ; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with different nucleophiles. With LiCH₂SiMe₃ and LiNMe₂, the monoanionic products [Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅CH₂SiMe₃)]^? and [Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅NMe₂)]^?, respectively, are formed. The reaction of 1 with NaNH₂ leads to the formation of the trianionic compound [{Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅)}₂N]^3?, whereas the reaction with LiPH₂ yields [Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅PH₂)]^? as the main product, with {[Cp*Fe(η⁴‐P₅)]₂PH}^2? as a byproduct. The calculated energy profile of the reactions provides a rationale for the formation of the different products.     

Reactions of Bromine Fluoride Dioxide,BrO2F,for the Generation of the Mixed‐Valent Bromine Oxygen Cations Br3O4+ and Br3O6+

A reliable synthesis of unstable and highly reactive BrO₂F is reported. This compound can be converted into BrO₂⁺SbF₆^?, BrO₂⁺AsF₆^?_, and BrO₂⁺AsF₆^??2 BrO₂F. The latter decomposes into mixed‐valent Br₃O₄?Br₂⁺AsF₆^? with five‐, three‐, one‐, and zero‐valent bromine. BrO₂⁺ H(SO₃CF₃)₂^? is formed with HSO₃CF₃. Excess BrO₂F yields mixed‐valent Br₃O₆⁺OSO₃CF₃^? with five‐ and three‐valent bromine. Reactions of BrO₂F and MoF₅ in SO₂ClF or CH₂ClF result in Cl₂BrO₆⁺Mo₃O₃F₁₃^?. The reaction of BrO₂F with (CF₃CO)₂O and NO₂ produces O₂Br‐O‐CO‐CF₃ and the known NO₂⁺Br(ONO₂)₂^?. All of these compounds are thermodynamically unstable.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von Bis(dialkylamino)diphosphanen

Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity of Bis(dialkylamino)diphosphines Starting with the aminochlorophosphines ⁱPr₂N? PCl₂ 1 and (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? Cl 2 , the synthesis of some new functionalized aminophosphines (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? SiMe₃ 3a , (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? SnMe₃ 3b , (ⁱPr₂N)(DMP)P? Cl 4 , ⁱPr₂N? P(SiMe₃)₂ 5 and ⁱPr₂N? P(SiMe₃)Cl 6 is reported. Reactions of 2 with different phosphides yield the aminodiphosphines (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? P(SiMe₃)₂ 7a , (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? P(SiMe₂^tBu)₂ 7b , (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? PPh₂ 8 and (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? PH₂ 9 . The phosphines 3a/b react with halogenophosphines to the aminohalogenodiphosphines (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? PCl₂ 10 , (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? P^tBuCl 11 and (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? P(NⁱPr₂)Cl 12 . The ambivalente aminophosphine 6 gives the aminotrichlorodiphosphine Cl(ⁱPr₂N)P? PCl₂ 13 after condensation with PCl₃, while the reactions with the corresponding lithiumphosphides yield the aminosilyldiphosphines (ⁱPr₂N)(SiMe₃)P? P(SiMe₃)₂ 14a and (ⁱPr₂N)(SiMe₃)P? P(SiMe₂^tBu)₂ 14b . The aminochlorophosphines 2/4 are reductively coupled with magnesium leading to the symmetrically substituted tetraaminodiphosphines (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? P(ⁱPr₂N)₂ 15a and DMP(ⁱPr₂N)P? P(ⁱPr₂N)DMP 15b . The functionalized aminosilyldiphosphine 7a is treated with methanol to yield the diphosphine (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? PH(SiMe₃) 16 and gives the lithium phosphinophosphide (ⁱPr₂N)₂P? PLi(SiMe₃) 17 after metallation with n-BuLi. The compounds are characterized by their NMR and mass spectra and the ³¹P-NMR values of the diphosphines are discussed according to their substituents. The crystal structures of 7b, 8 and 15b showing significantly differing conformations are presented.     

Reactions of small negative ions with O2(a Δg) and O2(X Σg)

The rate constants and product ion branching ratios were measured for the reactions of various small negative ions with O₂(X ³Σ_g⁻) and O₂(a ¹Δ_g) in a selected ion flow tube (SIFT). Only NH₂⁻ and CH₃O⁻ were found to react with O₂(X) and both reactions were slow. CH₃O⁻ reacted by hydride transfer, both with and without electron detachment. NH₂⁻ formed both OH⁻, as observed previously, and O₂⁻, the latter via endothermic charge transfer. A temperature study revealed a negative temperature dependence for the former channel and Arrhenius behavior for the endothermic channel, resulting in an overall rate constant with a minimum at 500 K. SF₆⁻, SF₄⁻, SO₃⁻ and CO₃⁻ were found to react with O₂(a ¹Δ_g) with rate constants less than 10⁻¹¹ cm³ s⁻¹. NH₂⁻ reacted rapidly with O₂(a ¹Δ_g) by charge transfer. The reactions of HO₂⁻ and SO₂⁻ proceeded moderately with competition between Penning detachment and charge transfer. SO₂⁻ produced a SO₄⁻ cluster product in 2% of reactions and HO₂⁻ produced O₃⁻ in 13% of the reactions. CH₃O⁻ proceeded essentially at the collision rate by hydride transfer, again both with and without electron detachment. These results show that charge transfer to O₂(a ¹Δ_g) occurs readily if the there are no restrictions on the ion beyond the reaction thermodynamics. The SO₂⁻ and HO₂⁻ reactions with O₂(a) are the only known reactions involving Penning detachment besides the reaction with O₂⁻ studied previously [R.S. Berry, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 7 (2005) 289–290].     

Alkaline-Earth Metal Mediated Benzene-to-Biphenyl Coupling

Complex [(^DIPePBDI)Ca]₂(C₆H₆), with a C₆H₆²⁻ dianion bridging two Ca²⁺ ions, reacts with benzene to yield [(^DIPePBDI)Ca]₂(biphenyl) with a bridging biphenyl²⁻ dianion (^DIPePBDI=HC[C(Me)N-DIPeP]₂; DIPeP=2,6-CH(Et)₂-phenyl). The biphenyl complex was also prepared by reacting [(^DIPePBDI)Ca]₂(C₆H₆) with biphenyl or by reduction of [(^DIPePBDI)CaI]₂ with KC₈ in presence of biphenyl. Benzene-benzene coupling was also observed when the deep purple product of ball-milling [(^DIPPBDI)CaI(THF)]₂ with K/KI was extracted with benzene (DIPP=2,6-CH(Me)₂-phenyl) giving crystalline [(^DIPPBDI)Ca(THF)]₂(biphenyl) (52 % yield). Reduction of [(^DIPePBDI)SrI]₂ with KC₈ gave highly labile [(^DIPePBDI)Sr]₂(C₆H₆) as a black powder (61 % yield) which reacts rapidly and selectively with benzene to [(^DIPePBDI)Sr]₂(biphenyl). DFT calculations show that the most likely route for biphenyl formation is a pathway in which the C₆H₆²⁻ dianion attacks neutral benzene. This is facilitated by metal-benzene coordination.     

Structural and Spectroscopic Studies of Halocuprate(I) and Haloargentate(I) Complexes [M2XnX′4−n]2−

The complexes [Cu₂Br₄]^2?, [Cu₂I₄]^2?, [Cu₂I₂Br₂]^2?, [Cu₂I₃Cl]^2?, [Ag₂Cl₄]^2? have been characterized as their isomorphous bis(triphenylphosphoranylidene)ammonium ([Ph₃PNPPh₃]⁺ = PNP⁺) salts by single crystal structural determinations. All anions show the centrosymmetric doubly halogen‐bridged forms [XM(μ‐X)₂MX]^2? with three‐coordinate metal atoms that have been observed in [M₂X₄]^2? complexes with other large organic cations. In [Cu₂I₂Br₂]^2? the iodide ligands occupy the bridging positions and the bromide the terminal positions, while in [Cu₂I₃Cl]^2?, obtained in an attempt to prepare [Cu₂I₂Cl₂]^2?, two of the iodide ligands occupy the bridging positions with the third iodide and the chloride ligand occupying two statistically disordered terminal positions. In [Ag₂Cl₄]^2? the distortion from ideal trigonal coordination of the metal atom is greater than in the copper complexes, but less than in other previously reported [Ag₂Cl₄]^2? complexes with organic cations. The ν(MX) bands have been assigned in the far‐IR spectra, and confirm previous observations regarding the unexpectedly simple IR spectra of [Cu₂X₄]^2? complexes.     

Zum Einfluß der PR3‐Liganden auf Bildung und Eigenschaften der Phosphinophosphiniden‐Komplexe [{η2‐tBu2P–P}Pt(PR3)2] und [{η2‐tBu2P1–P2}Pt(P3R3)(P4R′3)]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes XXI The Influence of the PR₃ Ligands on Formation and Properties of the Phosphinophosphinidene Complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PR₃)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³R₃)(P⁴R′₃)] (R₃P)₂PtCl₂ and C₂H₄ yield the compounds [{η²‐C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (PR₃ = PMe₃, PEt₃, PPhEt₂, PPh₂Et, PPh₂Me, PPh₂ⁱPr, PPh₂^tBu and P(p‐Tol)₃); which react with ^tBu₂P–P=PMe^tBu₂ to give the phosphinophosphinidene complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PMe₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PEt₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPhEt₂)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Et)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Me)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂ⁱPr], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂^tBu)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂]. [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] reacts with PMe₃ and PEt₃ as well as with ^tBu₂PMe, PⁱPr₃ and P(c‐Hex)₃ by substituting one PPh₃ ligand to give [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Ph₃)(P⁴Me₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Et₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³ⁱPr₃)(P⁴Ph₃)] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³(c‐Hex)₃)(P⁴Ph₃)]. With ^tBu₂PMe, [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂] forms [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴(p‐Tol)₃)]. The NMR data of the compounds are given and discussed with respect to the influence of the PR₃ ligands.     

Ternäre Thallium-Indium-Sulfide: Eine Zusammenfassung

Ternary Thallium Indium Sulfides: A Summary Combined thermal and X-Ray analyses in the ternary system Thallium—Indium—Sulfur show, that the two binary sections Tl₂S? In₂S₃ and TlS? InS contain ternary compounds with unique crystal structures. The chemical formulas of these ternary solids are TlIn₅S₈, TlIn₃S₅, TlInS₂ and Tl₃InS₃ for the section Tl₂S? In₂S₃ and TlIn₅S₆ as well as Tl₃In₅S₈ (metastable high temperature phase) for the section TlS? InS respectively. With TlIn₅S₇ an additional ternary solid could be detected, which is located outside the two sections. It is derived from the binary mixed valence compound In₆S₇ by complete substitution of In⁺ by Tl⁺. The following ionic formulations make the mixed valence character of the ternary Thallium—Indium-Sulfides reasonable: TlIn₅S₈ = Tl⁺(In³⁺)₅(S^2?)₈, TlIn₃S₅ = Tl⁺ (In³⁺)₃(S^2?)₅, TlInS₂ = Tl⁺In³⁺(S^2?)₂, Tl₃InS₃ = (Tl⁺)₃In³⁺ · (S^2?)₃, TlIn₅S₆ = Tl⁺([In₂]⁴⁺)₂In³⁺ (S^2?)₆, Tl₃In₅S₈ = 4 × [(Tl⁺)_0,75 · (In⁺)_0,25In³⁺(S^2?)₂], TlIn₅S₇ = Tl⁺[In₂]⁴⁺ (In³⁺)₃(S^2?)₇. All compounds contain Tl⁺-ions in a characteristic “lone pair coordination” of S^2? ions. Indium atoms however occur with the oxidation numbers +2 (formal, In₂ dumb bells with covalent In? In bonding) and +3 (with In³⁺ in tetrahedral and octahedral coordination of S^2?). Chemical preparation, crystal chemistry and general properties of the ternary solids are discussed, summarized and compared to each other.     

Synthesis and structures of the η5-C5H5Cl(CO)2W-η1,η5-(PPh2)C5H4(CO)2Fe-η1,η5-C5H4Mn(CO)3 and MeSi[C5H4(CO)2Fe-η1,η5-C5H4Mn(CO)2PPh3]3 complexes

The metallation of the η⁵-C₅H₅(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ complex with BuⁿLi (THF, ?78 °C) followed by the treatment of the lithium derivative with Ph₂PCl afforded the η⁵-Ph₂PC₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ complex. The reaction of the latter with η⁵-C₅H₅(CO)₃WCl in the presence of Me₃NO produced the trinuclear complex η⁵-C₅H₅Cl(CO)₂W-η¹,η⁵-(Ph₂P)C₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃. The structure of the latter complex was established by IR, UV, and 1H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The reaction of MeSiCl₃ with three equivalents of LiC₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₂PPh₃ gave the hexanuclear complex MeSi[C₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₂PPh₃]₃.     

Luminescence Tuning of Upconversion Nanocrystals

Upconversion luminescence tuning of β‐NaYF₄ nanorods under 980 nm excitation has successfully been achieved by tridoping with Ln³⁺ ions with different electronic structures. The effects of Ce³⁺ ions on NaYF₄:Yb³⁺/Ho³⁺ as well as Gd³⁺ ions on NaYF₄:Yb³⁺/Tm³⁺(Er³⁺) have been studied in detail. By tridoping with Ce³⁺ ions, not only were unusual ⁵G₅→⁵I₇ and ⁵F₂/³K₈→⁵I₈ transitions from Ho³⁺ ions and 5d→4f transitions from Ce³⁺ ions observed in NaYF₄:Yb³⁺/Ho³⁺ nanorods, but also an increase in the intensity of ⁵F₅→⁵I₈ relative to ⁵S₂/⁵F₄→⁵I₈ with increasing Ce³⁺ concentration, which can be attributed to efficient energy transfers of ⁵I₆ (Ho)+²F_5/2 (Ce)→⁵I₇ (Ho)+²F_7/2 (Ce) and ⁵S₂/⁵F₄ (Ho)+²F_5/2 (Ce)→⁵F₅ (Ho)+²F_7/2 (Ce). Interestingly, with increasing pump power density, the luminescence of NaYF₄:Yb³⁺/Ho³⁺ nanorods is always dominated by the ⁵S₂/⁵F₄→⁵I₈ transition, whereas the luminescence of Ce³⁺‐tridoped NaYF₄:Yb³⁺/Ho³⁺ nanorods is dominated by the ⁵S₂/⁵F₄→⁵I₈ and ⁵G₅→⁵I₇ transitions in turn. These observations are discussed on the basis of a rate equation model. Furthermore, Gd³⁺‐tridoped NaYF₄:Yb³⁺/Tm³⁺(Er³⁺) nanorods can emit multicolor upconversion emissions spanning from the UV to the near‐infrared under 980 nm excitation. ⁶P_5/2→⁸S_7/2 (≈306 nm) and ⁶P_7/2→⁸S_7/2 (≈311 nm) transitions from Gd³⁺ ions were observed. In addition to the aforementioned luminescence properties, these Gd³⁺‐tridoped nanorods also exhibit paramagnetic behavior at room temperature and superparamagnetic behavior at 2 or 5 K.     

Counter‐Intuitive Gas‐Phase Reactivities of [V2]+ and [V2O]+ towards CO2 Reduction: Insight from Electronic Structure Calculations

[V₂O]⁺ remains “invisible” in the thermal gas‐phase reaction of bare [V₂]⁺ with CO₂ giving rise to [V₂O₂]⁺; this is because the [V₂O]⁺ intermediate is being consumed more than 230 times faster than it is generated. However, the fleeting existence of [V₂O]⁺ and its involvement in the [V₂]⁺ → [V₂O₂]⁺ chemistry are demonstrated by a cross‐over labeling experiment with a 1:1 mixture of C¹⁶O₂/C¹⁸O₂, generating the product ions [V₂¹⁶O₂]⁺, [V₂¹⁶O¹⁸O]⁺, and [V₂¹⁸O₂]⁺ in a 1:2:1 ratio. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations help to understand the remarkable and unexpected reactivity differences of [V₂]⁺ versus [V₂O]⁺ towards CO₂.     

Counter‐Anion‐Regulated Mixed‐Valency of Cobalt(II/III) Centers in a Metallosupramolecular Framework

A diamagnetic Au^I₄Co^III₂ hexanuclear complex, [Au₄Co₂(dppe)₂(l ‐nmc)₄]²⁺ ([ 1_{L ‐ nmc} ]²⁺; dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, l ‐H₂nmc=N‐methyl‐l ‐cysteine), was newly synthesized by the reaction of [Co(l ‐nmc)₂]^? with [Au₂Cl₂(dppe)] and crystallized with different inorganic anions (X=ClO₄^?, NO₃^?, Cl^?, SO₄^2?) to produce ionic solids ([ 1_{L ‐ nmc} ]X_n). Single‐crystal X‐ray analysis revealed that all the solids crystallize in the chiral space group F432 with a face‐centered‐cubic lattice structure consisting of supramolecular octahedra of complex cations. The paramagnetic nature of all the solids was evidenced by magnetic susceptibility measurements, showing the variation of the oxidation states of two cobalt centers in [ 1_{L ‐ nmc} ]ⁿ⁺ from Co^II_1.00Co^III_1.00 for X=ClO₄^? or NO₃^? to Co^II_0.67Co^III_1.33 for X=Cl^?, via Co^II_0.83Co^III_1.17 for X=SO₄^2?. The difference in the Co^II/III mixed‐valences was explained by the difference in sizes and charges of counter anions accommodated in lattice interstices with a fixed volume.     

Darstellung von CF3SClF+MF6− (M = As,Sb) und Kristallstruktur von CF3SCl2+SbF6−

Preparation of CF₃SClF⁺MF₆^? (M = As, Sb) and Crystal Structure of CF₃SCl₂⁺SbF₆^? CF₃SClF⁺MF₆^? (M = As, Sb) is prepared by oxidative fluorination of CF₃SCl with XeF⁺MF₆^?. The new salt is characterized by IR, Raman and NMR spectra in comparison with CF₃SF₂⁺MF₆^? and CF₃SCl₂⁺MF₆^?. In SO₂ solution CF₃SClF⁺SbF₆^? symmetrizises into CF₃SF₂⁺SbF₆^? and crystalline CF₃SCl₂⁺SbF₆^? with the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 773.5(14) pm, b = 954.8(15) pm, c = 1242.0(18) pm, β = 100.24(8)°, Z = 4.     

TiO2基态和激发态的几何结构、激发能和偶极矩

采用二阶微扰理论MP2、密度泛函B3LYP方法和含时密度泛函TD-B3LYP方法分别优化了TiO₂分子的基态¹A₁和六个激发态¹B₂、³B₂、¹B₁、³B₁、¹A₂和³A₂的几何结构. ¹A₁、¹B₂、³B₂、¹B₁和³B₁具有弯曲几何结构, ¹A₂和³A₂具有线性对称结构. 我们发现激发态¹B₂、³B₂、¹B₁和³B₁键偶极矩的数值大小顺序和相应的键角大小顺序完全一致. 另外, 采用完全活化空间自洽场(CASSCF)CASSCF(6,6)、CASSCF(8,8)、多参考组态相互作用(MRCI)和含时密度泛函TD-B3LYP 计算了TiO₂ 分子各激发态的垂直激发能和绝热激发能. 对¹B₂、³B₂和¹B₁三个态, MRCI/CASSCF(6,6) 计算的垂直激发能和绝热激发能与已有的实验值最接近. 对其他三个激发态³B₁、¹A₂和³A₂, 计算的激发能和文献报道的激发能计算值基本一致. 最后, 还计算了TiO₂分子的基态和激发态的偶极矩. 对¹A₁和¹B₂态, 偶极矩的计算值与已有的实验值相吻合. 采用原子偶极矩校正的Hirshfeld 布居方法计算了TiO₂分子在¹A₁、¹B₂、³B₂、¹B₁和³B₁态时各原子的电荷, 发现从基态到激发态偶极矩的变化与电荷从氧原子向钛原子的转移有关. 整个计算中还考察了基函数cc-pVDZ、cc-pVTZ和cc-pVQZ对计算结果的影响.     

The kinetics of free radicals generated by IR laser photolysis. II. Reactions of C2(X 1Σ+g), C2(a 3Πu), C3(X̄ 1Σ+g) and CN(X 2Σ+) with O2

The 300 K reactions of O₂ with C₂(X ¹Σ⁺_g), C₂(a ³ Π_u), C₃(X? ¹Σ⁺_g) and CN(X ²Σ⁺), which are generated via IR multiple photon dissociation (MPD), are reported. From the spectrally resolved chemiluminescence produced via the IR MPD of C₂H₃CN in the presence of O₂, CO molecules in the a ³Σ⁺, d ³Δ_i, and e ³Σ^? states were identified, as well as CH(A ²Δ) and CN(B ²Σ⁺) radicals. Observation of time resolved chemiluminescence reveals that the electronically excited CO molecules are formed via the single-step reactions C₂(X ¹Σ⁺_g, a ³Π_u) + O₂ → CO(X ¹Σ⁺ + CO(T), where T denotes are electronically excited triplet state of CO. The rate coefficients for the removal of C₂(X ¹Σ⁺_g) and C₂(a ³Π_u) by O₂ were determined both from laser induced fluorescence of C₂(X ¹Σ⁺_g) and C₂(a ³Π_u), and from the time resolved chemiluminescence from excited CO molecules, and are both (3.0 ± 0.2)10^?12 cm³ molec^?1 s^?1. The rate coefficient of the reaction of C₃ with O₂, which was determined using the IR MPD of allene as the source of C₃ molecules, is <2 × 10^?14 cm³ molec^?1 s^?1. In addition, we find that rate coefficients for C₃ reactions with N₂, NO, CH₄, and C₃H₆ are all < × 10^?14 cm³ molec^?1 s^?1. Excited CH molecules are produced in a reaction which proceeds with a rate coefficient of (2.6 ± 0.2)10^?11 cm³ molec^?1 s^?1. Possible reactions which may be the source of these radicals are discussed. The reaction of CN with O₂ produces NCO in vibrationally excited states. Radiative lifetime of the ā ²Σ state of NCo and the ā ¹Π_u(000) state of C₃ are reported.     

[Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g3‐tBu2PPCH–CH3)] aus [Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g2‐C2H4)2] und tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVII [1] [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] from [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g²‐C₂H₄)₂] and ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] 1 is formed in the reaction of [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η²‐C₂H₄)₂] 2 with ^tBu₂P–P 4 (generated from ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 ) by elimination of one C₂H₄ ligand and coupling of the phosphinophosphinidene with the second one. The structure of 1 is proven by ³¹P, ¹³C, ¹H NMR spectra and the X‐ray structure analysis. Within the ligand ^tBu₂P¹P²C¹H–CH₃ in 1 , the angle P1–P2–C1 amounts to 90°. The Co, P1, P2, C1 atoms in 1 look like a „butterfly”︁. The reaction of 2 with a mixture of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 and ^tBu–C?P 5 yields [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅){η⁴‐(^tBuCP)₂}] 6 and 1 . While 6 is spontaneously formed, 1 appears only after complete consumption of 5 .     

The Reaction of Ozone with the Hydroxide Ion: Mechanistic Considerations Based on Thermokinetic and Quantum Chemical Calculations and the Role of HO4− in Superoxide Dismutation

The reaction of OH^? with O₃ eventually leads to the formation of ^.OH radicals. In the original mechanistic concept (J. Staehelin, J. Hoigné, Environ. Sci. Technol. 1982 , 16, 676–681), it was suggested that the first step occurred by O transfer: OH^?+O₃→HO₂^?+O₂ and that ^.OH was generated in the subsequent reaction(s) of HO₂^? with O₃ (the peroxone process). This mechanistic concept has now been revised on the basis of thermokinetic and quantum chemical calculations. A one‐step O transfer such as that mentioned above would require the release of O₂ in its excited singlet state (¹O₂, O₂(¹Δ_g)); this state lies 95.5 kJ mol^?1 above the triplet ground state (³O₂, O₂(³Σ_g^?)). The low experimental rate constant of 70 M ^?1 s^?1 is not incompatible with such a reaction. However, according to our calculations, the reaction of OH^? with O₃ to form an adduct (OH^?+O₃→HO₄^?; ΔG=3.5 kJ mol^?1) is a much better candidate for the rate‐determining step as compared with the significantly more endergonic O transfer (ΔG=26.7 kJ mol^?1). Hence, we favor this reaction; all the more so as numerous precedents of similar ozone adduct formation are known in the literature. Three potential decay routes of the adduct HO₄^? have been probed: HO₄^?→HO₂^?+¹O₂ is spin allowed, but markedly endergonic (ΔG=23.2 kJ mol^?1). HO₄^?→HO₂^?+³O₂ is spin forbidden (ΔG=?73.3 kJ mol^?1). The decay into radicals, HO₄^?→HO₂^.+O₂^.?, is spin allowed and less endergonic (ΔG=14.8 kJ mol^?1) than HO₄^?→HO₂^?+¹O₂. It is thus HO₄^?→HO₂^.+O₂^.? by which HO₄^? decays. It is noted that a large contribution of the reverse of this reaction, HO₂^.+O₂^.?→HO₄^?, followed by HO₄^?→HO₂^?+³O₂, now explains why the measured rate of the bimolecular decay of HO₂^. and O₂^.? into HO₂^?+O₂ (k=1×10⁸ M ^?1 s^?1) is below diffusion controlled. Because k for the process HO₄^?→HO₂^.+O₂^.? is much larger than k for the reverse of OH^?+O₃→HO₄^?, the forward reaction OH^?+O₃→HO₄^? is practically irreversible.     

Formation,Expansion, and Interconversion of Metallarings in a Sulfur‐Bridged AuICoIII Coordination System

A novel Au^ICo^III coordination system that is derived from the newly prepared [Co(D ‐nmp)₂]⁻ ( 1 ⁻; D ‐nmp=N‐methyl‐D ‐penicillaminate) and a gold(I) precursor Au^I is reported. Complex 1 ⁻ acts as a sulfur‐donating metallaligand and reacts with the gold(I) precursor to give [Au₂Co₂(D ‐nmp)₄] ( 2 ), which has an eight‐membered Au^I₂Co^III₂ metallaring. Treatment of 2 with [Au₂(dppe)₂]²⁺ (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) leads to the formation of [Au₄Co₂(dppe)₂(D ‐nmp)₄]²⁺ ( 3 ²⁺), which consists of an 18‐membered Au^I₄Co^III₂ metallaring that accommodates a tetrahedral anion (BF₄⁻, ClO₄⁻, ReO₄⁻). In solution, the metallaring structure of 3 ²⁺ is readily interconvertible with the nine‐membered Au^I₂Co^III metallaring structure of [Au₂Co(dppe)(D ‐nmp)₂]⁺ ( 4 ⁺); this process depends on external factors, such as solvent, concentration, and nature of the counteranion. These results reveal the lability of the Au S and Au P bonds, which is essential for metallaring expansion and contraction.