Isomerisierung bei der Komplexbildung von 3-Acetyl-tetramsäure: Struktur und magnetische Eigenschaften des CuII- und NiII-Komplexes von 2,7-Bis(1′, 5′, 5′-trimethylpyrrolidin-2′, 4′-dion-3′ -yl)-3, 6-diazaocta-2, 6-dien

Isomerization at the Complexation of 3-Acetyltetramic Acid: Structure and Magnetic Properties of the Cu^II- and Ni^II-Complex of 2,7-Bis (1′, 5′, 5′ -trimethylpyrrolidin-2′,4′ -dion-3′ -yl)-3,6-diazaocta-2,6-dien 2,7-Bis(1′, 5′, 5′ -trimethylpyrrolidin-2′, 4′ -dion-3′ -yl)-3,6-diazaoctadien formes Cu^II and Ni^II complexes with different constitutions (because of the Z/E isomerization). Results of X-ray analysis of N,N′ -ethylenbis(1′, 5′, 5′ -trimethylpyrrolidin-2′, 4′ -dion-3′ -acetiminato)nickel(II) 1 respectively -copper(II) 2 shows, that the complexing agent in 1 occurs in the E-form, whereas the ligand of the Cu^II complex forms the Z-form. Magnetic susceptibility and shift effects of the ¹³C-NMR signals point to a weak paramagnetism of the Ni^II complex. ESR-spectra are obtained from 2 only. Furthermore, the Cu^II complex reduces the relaxation times T₁ and T₂ of ¹H and ¹⁷O nuclei spins from water. From the temperature dependence of the shortening of the relaxation times an activation energy is calculated which describes the reorientation of the copper complex in the “water matrix”.     

Über die Anwendung von Lanthaniden-Verschiebungs-Reagenzien (LSR) bei der Strukturbestimmung flexibler Moleküle,am Beispiel des 2-Methyltetrahydropyrans und des cis-4-Methyl-2-(2′-methyl-1′-propenyl)- tetrahydropyrans

The model of Davis and Willcott can be successfully applied to ¹H NMR lanthanide induced shifts (LIS) of 2-methyltetrahydropyran in the presence of Eu(dpm)₃. By contrast, the model does not work in the case of cis-4-methyl-2-(2′-methyl-1′-propenyl)tetrahydropyran (cis-Rosenoxide), probably due to the presence of more than one LSR-substrate complex in the solution.