Representation theorems for probability functions satisfying spectrum exchangeability in inductive logic

We prove de Finetti style representation theorems covering the class of all probability functions satisfying spectrum exchangeability in polyadic inductive logic and give an application by characterizing those probability functions satisfying spectrum exchangeability which can be extended to a language with equality whilst still satisfying that property.     

Inconsistency lemmas in algebraic logic

In this paper, the inconsistency lemmas of intuitionistic and classical propositional logic are formulated abstractly. We prove that, when a (finitary) deductive system is algebraized by a variety , then has an inconsistency lemma—in the abstract sense—iff every algebra in has a dually pseudo‐complemented join semilattice of compact congruences. In this case, the following are shown to be equivalent: (1)  has a classical inconsistency lemma; (2)  has a greatest compact theory and is filtral, i.e., semisimple with EDPC; (3) the compact congruences of any algebra in form a Boolean lattice; (4) the compact congruences of any constitute a Boolean sublattice of the full congruence lattice of . These results extend to quasivarieties and relative congruences. Except for (2), they extend even to protoalgebraic logics, with deductive filters in the role of congruences. A protoalgebraic system with a classical inconsistency lemma always has a deduction‐detachment theorem (DDT), while a system with a DDT and a greatest compact theory has an inconsistency lemma. The converses are false.     

Possibilistic nested logic programs and strong equivalence

In this paper, the class of possibilistic nested logic programs is introduced. These possibilistic logic programs allow us to use nested expressions in the bodies and heads of their rules. By considering a possibilistic nested logic program as a possibilistic theory, a construction of a possibilistic logic programing semantics based on answer sets for nested logic programs and the proof theory of possibilistic logic is defined. In order to define a general method for computing the possibilistic answer sets of a possibilistic nested program, the idea of equivalence between possibilistic nested programs is explored. By considering properties of equivalence between possibilistic programs, a process of transforming a possibilistic nested logic program into a possibilistic disjunctive logic program is defined. Given that our approach is an extension of answer set programming, we also explore the concept of strong equivalence between possibilistic nested logic programs. To this end, we introduce the concept of poss SE-models. Therefore, we show that two possibilistic nested logic programs are strong equivalents whenever they have the same poss SE-models.The expressiveness of the possibilistic nested logic programs is illustrated by a scenario from the medical domain. In particular, we exemplify how possibilistic nested logic programs are expressive enough for capturing medical guidelines which are pervaded by vagueness and qualitative information.     

Tableau method for residuated logic

Residuated logic is a generalization of intuitionistic logic, which does not assume the idempotence of the conjunction operator. Such generalized conjunction operators have proved important in expert systems (in the area of Approximate Reasoning) and in some areas of Theoretical Computer Science. Here we generalize the intuitionistic tableau procedure and prove that this generalized tableau method is sound for the semantics (the class of residuated algebras) of residuated propositional calculus (RPC). Since the axioms of RPC are complete for the semantics we may conclude that whenever a formula 0 is tableau provable, it is deducible in RPC. We present two different approaches for constructing residuated algebras which give us countermodels for some formulas φ which are not tableau provable. The first uses the fact that the theory of residuated algebras is equational, to construct quotients of free algebras. The second uses finite algebras. We end by discussing a number of open questions.     

On the infinite-valued Łukasiewicz logic that preserves degrees of truth

Łukasiewicz’s infinite-valued logic is commonly defined as the set of formulas that take the value 1 under all evaluations in the Łukasiewicz algebra on the unit real interval. In the literature a deductive system axiomatized in a Hilbert style was associated to it, and was later shown to be semantically defined from Łukasiewicz algebra by using a “truth-preserving” scheme. This deductive system is algebraizable, non-selfextensional and does not satisfy the deduction theorem. In addition, there exists no Gentzen calculus fully adequate for it. Another presentation of the same deductive system can be obtained from a substructural Gentzen calculus. In this paper we use the framework of abstract algebraic logic to study a different deductive system which uses the aforementioned algebra under a scheme of “preservation of degrees of truth”. We characterize the resulting deductive system in a natural way by using the lattice filters of Wajsberg algebras, and also by using a structural Gentzen calculus, which is shown to be fully adequate for it. This logic is an interesting example for the general theory: it is selfextensional, non-protoalgebraic, and satisfies a “graded” deduction theorem. Moreover, the Gentzen system is algebraizable. The first deductive system mentioned turns out to be the extension of the second by the rule of Modus Ponens.While writing this paper, the authors were partially supported by grants MTM2004-03101 and TIN2004-07933-C03-02 of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, including FEDER funds of the European Union.     

The case for an interval-based representation of linguistic truth

This paper develops an interval-based approach to the concept of linguistic truth. A special-purpose interval logic is defined, and it is argued that, for many applications, this logic provides a potentially useful alternative to the conventional fuzzy logic.The key idea is to interpret the numerical truth value v(p) of a proposition p as a degree of belief in the logical certainty of p, in which case p is regarded as true, for example, if v(p) falls within a certain range, say, the interval [0.7, 1]. This leads to a logic which, although being only a special case of fuzzy logic, appears to be no less linguistically correct and at the same time offers definite advantages in terms of mathematical simplicity and computational speed.It is also shown that this same interval logic can be generalized to a lattice-based logic having the capacity to accommodate propositions p which employ fuzzy predicates of type 2.     

Array approach to fuzzy logic

Promising results from applying an array-based approach to two-valued logic suggests its application to fuzzy logic. The idea is to limit the domain of truth-values to a discrete, finite domain, such that a logical relationship can be evaluated by an exhaustive test of all possible combinations of truth-values. The paper presents a study of the topic from an engineer's viewpoint. As an example 31 logical sentences valid in two-valued logic were tested in three-valued logic using the nested interactive array language, Nial. Out of these, 24 turned out to be valid in a three-valued extension based on the well-known S^* implication operator, also called “Gödel's implication operator”. Applications to automated approximate reasoning and fuzzy control are also illustrated.     

Distributions in fuzzy logic

Probability distributions associated with several ‘ply’-operators are discussed. These exact distributions are compared with relevant Gaussian approximations.     

Inquisitive logic as an epistemic logic of knowing how

In this paper, we present an alternative interpretation of propositional inquisitive logic as an epistemic logic of knowing how. In our setting, an inquisitive logic formula α being supported by a state is formalized as knowing how to resolve α (more colloquially, knowing how α is true) holds on the S5 epistemic model corresponding to the state. Based on this epistemic interpretation, we use a dynamic epistemic logic with both know-how and know-that operators to capture the epistemic information behind the innocent-looking connectives in inquisitive logic. We show that the set of valid know-how formulas corresponds precisely to the inquisitive logic. The main result is a complete axiomatization with intuitive axioms using the full dynamic epistemic language. Moreover, we show that the know-how operator and the dynamic operator can both be eliminated without changing the expressivity over models, which is consistent with the modal translation of inquisitive logic existing in the literature. We hope our framework can give an intuitive alternative interpretation to various concepts and technical results in inquisitive logic, and also provide a powerful and flexible tool to handle both the inquisitive reasoning and declarative reasoning in an epistemic context.     

Preservativity logic: An analogue of interpretability logic for constructive theories

In this paper we study the modal behavior of Σ‐preservativity, an extension of provability which is equivalent to interpretability for classical superarithmetical theories. We explain the connection between the principles of this logic and some well‐known properties of HA, like the disjunction property and its admissible rules. We show that the intuitionistic modal logic given by the preservativity principles of HA known so far, is complete with respect to a certain class of frames.     

Bilattices for deductions in multi-valued logic

In this exploratory paper we propose a framework for the deduction apparatus of multi-valued logics based on the idea that a deduction apparatus has to be a tool to manage information on truth values and not directly truth values of the formulas. This is obtained by embedding the algebraic structure V defined by the set of truth values into a bilattice B. The intended interpretation is that the elements of B are pieces of information on the elements of V. The resulting formalisms are particularized in the framework of fuzzy logic programming. Since we see fuzzy control as a chapter of multi-valued logic programming, this suggests a new and powerful approach to fuzzy control based on positive and negative conditions.     

Feasible algorithms for approximate reasoning using fuzzy logic

Deductive reasoning with classical logic is hampered when imprecision is present in the variables, although human reasoning can cope quite adequately with vague concepts. A new approach to reasoning which allows imprecise conclusions to be drawn consistently from imprecise premises was introduced by Baldwin [2]. This method is economical in calculation as it avoids the high dimensionality that fuzzy set representations often involve.This paper briefly reviews the method from an operational viewpoint, isolating the individual processes that are used in the method. A feasible algorithm for computing each process is then presented.It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the concept of, and operations on, fuzzy sets introduced by Zadeh [14].     

Conceptual variation and coordination in probability reasoning

This study investigates students’ conceptual variation and coordination among theoretical and experimental interpretations of probability. In the analysis we follow how Swedish students (12-13 years old) interact with a dice game, specifically designed to offer the students opportunities to elaborate on the logic of sample space, physical/geometrical considerations and experimental evidence when trying to develop their understanding of compound random phenomena.The analytical construct of contextualization was used as a means to provide structure to the qualitative analysis performed. Within the frame of the students’ problem encounters during the game and how they contextualized the solutions of the problems in personal contexts for interpretations, the analysis finds four main forms of appearance, or of limitations in appearance, of conceptual variation and coordination among theoretical and experimental interpretations of probability.     

A probabilistic extension of intuitionistic logic

We introduce a probabilistic extension of propositional intuitionistic logic. The logic allows making statements such as P_≥sα, with the intended meaning “the probability of truthfulness of α is at least s”. We describe the corresponding class of models, which are Kripke models with a naturally arising notion of probability, and give a sound and complete infinitary axiomatic system. We prove that the logic is decidable.     

Biprobability logic with conditional expectation

This paper is devoted to fill the gap in studying logics for biprobability structures. We introduce the logic $L_{\mathbb AE_1E_2}^a$ with two conditional expectation operators and prove the completeness theorem. © 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim     

A parametric representation of linguistic hedges in Zadeh’s fuzzy logic

This paper proposes a model for the parametric representation of linguistic hedges in Zadeh’s fuzzy logic. In this model each linguistic truth-value, which is generated from a primary term of the linguistic truth variable, is identified by a real number r depending on the primary term. It is shown that the model yields a method of efficiently computing linguistic truth expressions accompanied with a rich algebraic structure of the linguistic truth domain, namely De Morgan algebra. Also, a fuzzy logic based on the parametric representation of linguistic truth-values is introduced.     

A spatial modal logic with a location interpretation

A spatial modal logic (SML) is introduced as an extension of the modal logic S4 with the addition of certain spatial operators. A sound and complete Kripke semantics with a natural space (or location) interpretation is obtained for SML. The finite model property with respect to the semantics for SML and the cut‐elimination theorem for a modified subsystem of SML are also presented. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

A modal provability logic of explicit and implicit proofs

We establish the bi-modal forgetful projection of the Logic of Proofs and Formal Provability GLA. That is to say, we present a normal bi-modal provability logic with modalities □ and whose theorems are precisely those formulas for which the implicit provability assertions represented by the modality can be realized by explicit proof terms.