Retention mechanism of a cholesterol-coated C18 stationary phase: van't Hoff and Linear Solvation Energy Relationships (LSER) approaches

This study examines the effect of temperature on the dynamic cholesterol coating of a C18 stationary phase and the effect of this coating on the retention mechanism. In general, an increase in temperature results in a decrease in the mass of cholesterol coated on the stationary phase. Typically, an increase in temperature from 25°C to 55°C results in a nearly 60% reduction in the mass of cholesterol loaded. The inclusion of temperature, along with loading solvent composition and cholesterol concentration in the loading solvent, allows for loading a targeted amount of cholesterol on the stationary phase over an order-of-magnitude range. In addition to loading studies, the retention mechanism of small non-ionizable solutes was examined on cholesterol-coated stationary phases. A van't Hoff analysis was performed to assess retention thermodynamics, while a LSER approach was used to examine retention mechanism. With 50/50 water/organic mobile phases, the addition of cholesterol results in an increase in the entropic contribution to retention, with a decrease in the enthalpic contribution. The opposite trend is seen with 40/60 water/organic mobile phases. LSER system constants are also affected by a cholesterol coating on the stationary phase, with some changing to favor elution and others changing to favor retention.     

Linear Solvation Energy Relationships in the Determination of Specificity and Selectivity of Stationary Phases

The retention of fifty structurally different compounds has been studied using linear solvation energy relationships. Investigations were performed with the use of six various stationary phases with two mobile phases (50/50?% v/v methanol/water and 50/50?% v/v acetonitrile/water). Packing materials were home-made and functionalized with octadecyl, alkylamide, cholesterol, alkyl-phosphate and phenyl molecules. This is the first attempt to compare all of these stationary phases synthesized on the same silica gel batch. Therefore, all of them may be compared in more complex and believable way, than it was performed earlier in former investigations. The phase properties (based on Abraham model) were used to the classification of stationary phases according to their interaction properties. The hydrophilic system properties s, a, b indicate stronger interactions between solute and mobile phase for most of the columns. Both e and v cause greater retention as a consequence of preferable interactions with stationary phase by electron pairs and cavity formation as well as hydrophobic bonds. However, alkyl-phosphate phase has different retention properties, as it was expressed by positive sign of s coefficient. It may be concluded that most important parameters influencing the retention of compounds are volume and hydrogen bond acceptor basicity. The LSER coefficients showed also the dependency on the type of organic modifier used as a mobile phase component.     

Mobile phase effects on retention on a new butylimidazolium-based high-performance liquid chromatographic stationary phase

A new HPLC stationary phase based on n-butylimidazolium bromide has been characterized by a linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) approach in the binary acetonitrile/water mobile phases. The retention properties of the stationary phase were systematically evaluated in terms of intermolecular interactions between 28 test solutes and the stationary phase. The results and further comparisons with conventional reversed phase system confirm that retention properties are similar to phenyl phases in acetonitrile/water mixtures. The results obtained with acetonitrile/water mixtures are also compared with results obtained using methanol/water mixtures.     

Linear Solvation Energy Relationships in the Determination of Specificity and Selectivity of Stationary Phases

The retention of fifty structurally different compounds has been studied using linear solvation energy relationships. Investigations were performed with the use of six various stationary phases with two mobile phases (50/50 % v/v methanol/water and 50/50 % v/v acetonitrile/water). Packing materials were home-made and functionalized with octadecyl, alkylamide, cholesterol, alkyl-phosphate and phenyl molecules. This is the first attempt to compare all of these stationary phases synthesized on the same silica gel batch. Therefore, all of them may be compared in more complex and believable way, than it was performed earlier in former investigations. The phase properties (based on Abraham model) were used to the classification of stationary phases according to their interaction properties. The hydrophilic system properties s, a, b indicate stronger interactions between solute and mobile phase for most of the columns. Both e and v cause greater retention as a consequence of preferable interactions with stationary phase by electron pairs and cavity formation as well as hydrophobic bonds. However, alkyl-phosphate phase has different retention properties, as it was expressed by positive sign of s coefficient. It may be concluded that most important parameters influencing the retention of compounds are volume and hydrogen bond acceptor basicity. The LSER coefficients showed also the dependency on the type of organic modifier used as a mobile phase component.

     

Retention mechanisms in subcritical water reversed-phase chromatography

Differences in the properties of subcritical water and conventional water/acetonitrile and water/methanol mobile phases for reversed phase separations are explored. Using van’t Hoff plots enthalpies and entropies of transfer are compared among the mobile phases while linear solvation energy relationships are used to quantify contributions to retention based on a solute's polarizability, dipolarity, hydrogen bond donating ability, hydrogen bond accepting ability, and molecular size. Results suggest the presence of acetonitrile or methanol in the mobile phase may decrease dispersive interactions of the solute with the stationary phase compared to subcritical water, thereby lowering enthalpic contributions to retention. Enthalpic contributions are found to drive the retention of a methylene group in all systems studied.     

Retention characteristics of a new butylimidazolium-based stationary phase. Part II: anion exchange and partitioning

A surface-confined ionic liquid (SCIL) and a commercial quaternary amine silica-based stationary phase were characterized employing the linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) method in binary methanol/water mobile phases. The retention properties of the stationary phases were evaluated in terms of intermolecular interactions between 28 test solutes and the stationary phases. The comparison reveals a difference in the hydrophobic and hydrogen bond acceptance interaction properties between the two phases. The anion exchange retention mechanism of the SCIL phase was demonstrated using nucleotides. The utility of the SCIL phase in predicting logk _IL/water values by chromatographic methods is also discussed.     

Comparison of the Separation Characteristics of the Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Stationary Phases XBridge C8 and Phenyl and XTerra Phenyl in RP-LC

Differences in the system constants of the solvation parameter model and retention factor correlation plots for varied solutes are used to study the retention mechanism on XBridge C₈, XBridge Phenyl and XTerra Phenyl stationary phases with acetonitrile–water and methanol–water mobile phases containing from 10 to 70% (v/v) organic solvent. These stationary phases are compared with XBridge C₁₈ and XBridge Shield RP₁₈ characterized in an earlier report using the same protocol. The XBridge stationary phases are all quite similar in their retention properties with larger difference in absolute retention explained by differences in cohesion and the phase ratio, mainly, and smaller changes in relative retention (selectivity) by the differences in individual system constants and their variation with mobile phase type and composition. None of the XBridge stationary phases are selectivity equivalent but XBridge C₁₈ and XBridge Shield RP₁₈ have similar separation properties, likewise so do XBridge C₈ and XBridge Phenyl, while the differences between the two groups of two stationary phases is greater than the difference within either group. The limited range of changes in selectivity is demonstrated by the high coefficient of determination (>0.98) for plots of the retention factors for varied compounds on the different XBridge phases with the same mobile phase composition.     

Influence of solvent effects on retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography and solid-phase extraction using a cyanopropylsiloxane-bonded,silica-based sorbent

Summary The solvation parameter model is used to characterize the retention properties of a cyanopropylsiloxanebonded, silica-based sorbent with methanol, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and isopropanol in water as mobile phases. The system constants over the composition range 1 to 50 % (v/v) organic solvent indicate that retention occurs because of the relative ease of cavity formation in the solvated stationary phase compared to the same process in the predominantly aqueous mobile phase as well as from more favorable stationary phase interactions with solutes containing π- and n-electrons. The capacity of the solute for dipole-type interactions is not important whereas all hydrogen-bond-type interactions result in reduced retention. Graphing the system constants as a function of mobile phase composition provides a simple mechanism for interpreting the change in capacity of the chromatographic system for retention in terms of changes in the relative weighting of fundamental intermolecular interactions. A comparison is also made with the retention properties of an octadecylsiloxane-bonded, silica-based sorbent with 30 % (v/v) methanol in water as the mobile phase and the extraction characteristics of a porous polymer sorbent with 1 % (v/v) methanol, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and isopropanol in water as the sample processing solvent. Changes in sorbent selectivity due to selective uptake of the processing solvent are much smaller for the cyanopropylsiloxane-bonded sorbent than the results found for a porous polymer sorbent.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism of Small Neutral Compounds on Octylsiloxane-Bonded and Diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phases in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on an octylsiloxane-bonded (Kinetex C8) and diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded (Kinetex XB-C18) superficially porous silica stationary phases for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation-exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases with acetonitrile–water but not for methanol–water mobile phases. Compared with an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C18) retention is reduced due to a less favorable phase ratio for both the octylsiloxane-bonded and diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases while selectivity differences are small and solvent dependent. Selectivity differences for neutral compounds are larger for methanol–water but significantly suppressed for acetonitrile–water mobile phases. The selectivity differences arise from small changes in all system constants with solute size and hydrogen-bond basicity being the most important due to their dominant contribution to the retention mechanism. Exchanging the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica column for either the octylsiloxane-bonded or diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded silica column affords little scope for extending the selectivity space and is restricted to fine tuning of separations, and in some cases, to obtain faster separations due to a more favorable phase ratio. For weak bases larger differences in relative retention are expected with acetonitrile–water mobile phases on account of the additional cation exchange interactions possible that are absent for the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase.     

Influence of solvent effects on retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography and solid-phase extraction using a cyanopropylsiloxane-bonded,silica-based sorbent

Summary The solvation parameter model is used to characterize the retention properties of a cyanopropylsiloxane-bonded, silica-based sorbent with methanol, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and isopropanol in water as mobile phases. The system constants over the composition range 1 to 50% (v/v) organic solvent indicate that retention occurs because of the relative ease of cavity formation in the solvated stationary phase compared to the same process in the predominantly aqueous mobile phase as well as from more favorable stationary phase interactions with solutes containing - and n-electrons. The capacity of the solute for dipole-type interactions is not important whereas all hydrogen-bond-type interactions result in reduced retention. Graphing the system constants as a function of mobile phase composition provides a simple mechanism for interpreting the change in capacity of the chromatographic system for retention in terms of changes in the relative weighting of fundamental intermolecular interactions. A comparison is also made with the retention properties of an octadecylsiloxane-bonded, silica-based sorbent with 30% (v/v) methanol in water as the mobile phase and the extraction characteristics of a porous polymer sorbent with 1% (v/v) methanol, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and isopropanol in water as the sample processing solvent. Changes in sorbent selectivity due to selective uptake of the processing solvent are much smaller for the cyanopropylsiloxane-bonded sorbent than the results found for a porous polymer sorbent.     

Combined effects of mobile phase composition and temperature on the retention of homologous and polar test compounds on polydentate C8 column

Combined effects of temperature and mobile phase on the reversed phase chromatographic behavior of alkylbenzenes and simple substituted benzenes were investigated on a Blaze C₈ polydentate silica-based column, showing improved resistance against hydrolytic breakdown at temperatures higher than 60 °C, in comparison to silica-based stationary phases with single attachment sites. For better insight into the retention mechanism on polydentate columns, we determined the enthalpy and entropy of the transfer of the test compounds from the mobile to the stationary phase. The enthalpic contribution dominated the retention at 80% or lower concentrations of methanol in the mobile phase. Entropic effects are more significant in 90% methanol and in acetonitrile–water mobile phases. Anomalies in the effects of mobile phase on the enthalpy of retention of benzene, methylbenzene and polar benzene derivatives were observed, in comparison to regular change in enthalpy and entropy of adsorption with changing concentration of organic solvent and the alkyl length for higher alkylbenzenes. The temperature and the mobile phase effects on the retention are practically independent of each other and – to first approximation – can be described by a simple model equation, which can be used for optimization of separation conditions.     

Factors Affecting the Interpretation of Selectivity on Synergi Reversed-Phase Columns

The solvation parameter model is used to establish the contribution of cohesion, dipole-type, and hydrogen-bonding interactions to the retention mechanism on Synergi Hydro-RP, Fusion-RP, and Polar-RP reversed-phase columns with methanol–water mobile phases containing from 10–70% (v/v) methanol. Large changes in relative retention on the compared columns can result from steric resistance, differences in the phase ratios, and from dewetting at low methanol compositions while changes in intermolecular interactions are responsible for smaller changes at a fixed mobile phase composition. For Synergi Hydro-RP and Polar-RP changing methanol for acetonirile is more powerful for affecting changes in retention order than changing the stationary phase. The three Synergi columns show useful selectivity differences for method development when compared with 13 other modern reversed-phase columns representing a selection of different stationary phase chemistries. The results from this study indicate the limitations of classifying reversed-phase columns by the retention of prototypical compounds to define specific retention mechanisms.     

System Maps for Retention of Small Neutral Compounds on a Superficially Porous Ethyl-Bridged,Octadecylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phase in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on an ethyl-bridged, ocatadecylsiloxane-bonded superficially porous silica stationary phase (Kinetex EVO C18) for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation-exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases with acetonitrile–water but not methanol–water mobile phase compositions. Compared with a superficially porous octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C18) with a similar morphology but different topology statistically significant differences in selectivity at the 95% confidence level are observed for neutral compounds that vary by size and hydrogen-bond basicity with other intermolecular interactions roughly similar. These selectivity differences are dampened with acetonitrile–water mobile phases, but are significant for methanol–water mobile phase compositions containing <30% (v/v) methanol. A comparison of a totally porous ethyl-bridged, octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (XBridge C18) with Kinetex EVO C18 indicated that they are effectively selectivity equivalent.     

An assessment of the retention behaviour of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on reversed phase stationary phases--thermodynamic behaviour on C18 and phenyl-type surfaces

The thermodynamic retention behaviour of a linear series of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was investigated on C18 and selected phenyl-type reversed-phase stationary phases, namely C18, C18 Aqua, Propyl-phenyl and Synergi polar-RP stationary phases, using methanol mobile phases. The Propyl-phenyl stationary phase, despite having the lowest surface coverage, was found to exhibit significantly larger enthalpic interactions to the other Phenyl-type phase (Synergi polar-RP) even though this had a much higher surface coverage. This indicated that stronger interactions between the PAHs and the stationary phase ligands were occurring on the Propyl-phenyl phase. Evaluation of the elution band profile of the PAHs in the aqueous methanol mobile phase revealed fairly symmetrical bands for the C18, C18 Aqua and Synergi polar-RP, but severe peak tailing on the Propyl-phenyl phase. A change in mobile phase from methanol to acetonitrile improved the peak shape of the PAHs on the Propyl-phenyl phase, leading to the assumption that unfavourable pi-pi interactions were occurring between the electron-rich PAHs and the electron-rich phenyl rings of the Propyl-phenyl phase.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism on a Pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phase (Discovery HS F5) in RP-LC

The solvation parameter model is used to elucidate the retention mechanism of neutral compounds on the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Discovery HS F5) with methanol-water and acetonitrile-water mobile phases containing from 10 to 70% (v/v) organic solvent. The dominant factors that increase retention are solute size and electron lone pair interactions while polar interactions reduce retention. A comparison of the retention mechanism with an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase based on the same silica substrate and with a similar bonding density (Discovery HS C18) provides additional insights into selectivity differences for the two types of stationary phase. The methanol-water solvated pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase is more cohesive and/or has weaker dispersion interactions and is more dipolar/polarizable than the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. Differences in hydrogen-bonding interactions contribute little to relative retention differences. For mobile phases containing more than 30% (v/v) acetonitrile selectivity differences for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded and octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases are no more than modest with differences in hydrogen-bond acidity of greater importance than observed for methanol-water. Below 30% (v/v) acetonitrile selectivity differences are more marked owing to incomplete wetting of the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase at low volume fractions of acetonitrile that are not apparent for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. Steric repulsion affects a wider range of compounds on the octadecylsiloxane-bonded than pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase with methanol mobile phases resulting in additional selectivity differences than predicted by the solvation parameter model. Electrostatic interactions with weak bases were unimportant for methanol-water mobile phase compositions in contrast to acetonitrile-water where ion-exchange behavior is enhanced, especially for the pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase. The above results are compatible with a phenomenological interpretation of stationary phase conformations using the haystack, surface accessibility, and hydro-linked proton conduit models.     

Mobile phase effects in reversed-phase liquid chromatography: a comparison of acetonitrile/water and methanol/water solvents as studied by molecular simulation

Molecular simulations of water/acetonitrile and water/methanol mobile phases in contact with a C(18) stationary phase were carried out to examine the molecular-level effects of mobile phase composition on structure and retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. The simulations indicate that increases in the fraction of organic modifier increase the amount of solvent penetration into the stationary phase and that this intercalated solvent increases chain alignment. This effect is slightly more apparent for acetonitrile containing solvents. The retention mechanism of alkane solutes showed contributions from both partitioning and adsorption. Despite changes in chain structure and solvation, the molecular mechanism of retention for alkane solutes was not affected by solvent composition. The mechanism of retention for alcohol solutes was primarily adsorption at the interface between the mobile and stationary phase, but there were also contributions from interactions with surface silanols. The interaction between the solute and surface silanols become very important at high concentrations of acetonitrile.     

Comparison of four cholesterol‐based stationary phases for the separation of steroid hormones

The chromatographic behavior of steroid hormones on four cholesterol‐bonded stationary phases with different structures in binary methanol/water mobile phases was studied. Of the stationary phases tested, the commercially available stationary phases Cogent UDC cholesterol? and COSMOSIL cholester? provided better separations of steroid hormones in comparison to homemade aminocholesterol and diaminocholesterol stationary phases. The results show that the temperature has a significant influence on the retention and selectivity for steroid hormones separation. The temperature increase may cause changes in the elution order. From the dependences of the retention (ln k) on temperature (1/T), the standard partial molar enthalpy and standard partial molar entropy were calculated and their enthalpic and entropic contributions to the retention were compared. The enthalpic effects principally control the retention mechanism.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism for Small Neutral Compounds on Silica-Based Phenyl Phases in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on phenylhexylsiloxane- and pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded superficially porous silica stationary phases (Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl and Kinetex F5) for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases for acetonitrile–water mobile phases, but virtually absent for the same compounds for methanol–water mobile phases. The selectivity of the Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl stationary phase for small neutral compounds is similar to an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase with similar morphology Kinetex C-18 for both methanol–water and acetonitrile–water mobile phase compositions. The Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl and XBridge Phenyl stationary phases with the same topology but different morphology are selectivity equivalent, confirming that solvation of the interphase region can be effective at dampening selectivity differences for modern stationary phases. Small selectivity differences observed for XTerra Phenyl (different morphology and topology) confirm previous reports that the length and type of space arm for phenylalkylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases can result in small changes in selectivity. The pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex F5) has similar separation properties to the phenylhexylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases, but is not selectivity equivalent. However, for method development purposes, the scope to vary separations from an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C-18) to “phenyl phase” of the types studied here is limited for small neutral compounds. In addition, selectivity differences for the above stationary phases are enhanced by methanol–water and largely suppressed by acetonitrile–water mobile phases. For bases, larger selectivity differences are possible for the above stationary phases if electrostatic interactions are exploited, especially for acetonitrile-containing mobile phases.