Epitaxial and graphoepitaxial growth of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) from the melt on highly oriented high density polyethylene (HDPE) substrates

Although under normal conditions only the crystallization behavior of PE on oriented iPP substrates can be studied due to the higher melting point of iPP, the faster crystallization rate of a molten, oriented HDPE film compared to a nonoriented iPP layer was used to study the crystallization of iPP on the oriented HDPE film by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and electron diffraction (ED). Besides the known epitaxial relationship of HDPE/iPP with their chains 50° apart, two new orientation relationships with (a) chains of both polymers parallel and (hk0)_iPP in contact with the HDPE substrate, and (b) the a‐axis of iPP crystals parallel to the chain direction of HDPE but (001)_iPP in contact with the HDPE substrate were observed. Both orientations are assumed as graphoepitaxy. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 1893–1898, 1999     

间同立构聚丙烯在聚乙烯(100)晶面上的附生行为研究

利用电子显微镜的欠焦成像和电子衍射技术对间同立构聚丙烯(sPP)在高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)的(100)晶面上的结晶行为进行了研究,明场结果表明,sPP能在HDPE的(100)晶面上附生生长,形成相互交叉的草席状片晶结构,电子衍射结果证明,附生生长的sPP与HDPE的接触面为(100)晶面,sPP与HDPE的分子链方向成固定的±37.交角,说明sPP在纤维取向的HDPE基质上附生结晶不仅仅是HDPE的(110)晶面对sPP有取向成核作用,(100)HDPE晶面也可作为sPP晶体的取向成核点.     

Polymorphism and Thermal Behaviour of Syndiotactic Poly(propylene)/Carbon Nanotube Composites

Summary: Nanocomposite materials were obtained by blending multi‐wall carbon nanotubes (CN), obtained by acetylene catalytic chemical vapour deposition (CVD) on Co/Fe‐modified NaY zeolite, with syndiotactic poly(propylene) (sPP). The nanotubes, well dispersed in the polymer matrix, favour the crystallization of the sPP helical chains and significantly improve the sPP thermal stability either in nitrogen or in air. The morphology of the sPP affects the behaviour of the sPP degradation in air.

Thermogravimetric analysis in air of pure sPP and the nanocomposite material.     

Crystallization and phase morphology of injection‐molded isotactic polypropylene (iPP)/syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP) blends

The crystallization and phase morphology of the injection‐molded isotactic polypropylene (iPP)/syndiotactic polypylenen (sPP) blends were studied, focusing on the difference between the skin layer and core layer. The distribution of crystallinity of PPs in the blends calculated based upon the DSC results shows an adverse situation when compared with that in the neat polymer samples. For 50/50 wt % iPP/sPP blend, the SEM results indicated that a dispersed structure in the skin layer and a cocontinuous structure in the core layer were observed. A migration phenomenon that the sPP component with lower crystallization temperature and viscosity move to the core layer, whereas the iPP component with higher crystallization temperature and viscosity move to the skin layer, occurred in the iPP/sPP blend during injection molding process. The phenomenon of low viscosity content migrate to the low shear zone may be due to the crystallization‐induced demixing based upon the significant difference of crystallization temperature in the sPP and iPP. This migration caused the composition inhomogeneity in the blend and influenced the accuracy of crystallinity calculated based upon the initial composition. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 2948–2955, 2007     

原位聚合聚乙烯/蒙脱土纳米复合材料的结晶行为

用DSC研究了HDPE与MMT负载的催化剂熔融共混和原位聚合得到的两种纳米复合材料的熔融、 结晶行为和等温结晶动力学.  结果表明, HDPE与熔融共混样品的结晶度、 平衡熔点、 球晶生长速率和结晶能力大体相同; 原位聚合得到的HDPE/MMT纳米复合材料的结晶度和平衡熔点高于纯HDPE; 在相同过冷度条件下熔融结晶速率和结晶能力低于纯HDPE, 而在相同结晶温度Tc下, 熔融结晶速率和结晶能力则高于纯HDPE.  纯HDPE的晶体生长侧向单位面积表面自由能最小, 其次是熔融共混样品, 原位聚合样品最大, 且随ＭＭＴ含量的增加逐渐升高.     

HDPE solution crystallization induced by electrospun PA66 nanofiber

Nanohybrid shish?Ckebab (NHSK), induced by polyamide 66 (PA66) nanofiber, was successfully fabricated in high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/xylene solution via isothermal crystallization. The crystalline morphological features of NHSK were observed by scanning electron microscopy. In the structure of NHSK, PA66 nanofiber serves as shish and HDPE lamellae act as kebabs periodically surrounding the nanofiber. Additionally, it reveals that both HDPE solution concentration and crystallization time have significant effects on the size of HDPE kebab. That is, as the concentration and crystallization time increase, the diameter of the kebab increases. Moreover, when crystallization time further increases, the crystals decorated on PA66 nanofiber exhibit a three-dimensional growth (i.e., aggregate of crystallites) rather than a two-dimensional one (i.e., disk-like lamellae normal to the axis of nanofiber).     

Solid-state relaxations in linear low-density (1-octene comonomer), low-density,and high-density polyethylene blends

Extensive thermal and relaxational behavior in the blends of linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) (1-octene comonomer) with low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) have been investigated to elucidate miscibility and molecular relaxations in the crystalline and amorphous phases by using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and a dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer (DMTA). In the LLDPE/LDPE blends, two distinct endotherms during melting and crystallization by DSC were observed supporting the belief that LLDPE and LDPE exclude one another during crystallization. However, the dynamic mechanical β and γ relaxations of the blends indicate that the two constituents are miscible in the amorphous phase, while LLDPE dominates α relaxation. In the LLDPE/HDPE system, there was a single composition-dependent peak during melting and crystallization, and the heat of fusion varied linearly with composition supporting the incorporation of HDPE into the LLDPE crystals. The dynamic mechanical α, β, and γ relaxations of the blends display an intermediate behavior that indicates miscibility in both the crystalline and amorphous phases. In the LDPE/HDPE blend, the melting or crystallization peaks of LDPE were strongly influenced by HDPE. The behavior of the α relaxation was dominated by HDPE, while those of β and γ relaxations were intermediate of the constituents, which were similar to those of the LLDPE/HDPE blends. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 35 : 1633–1642, 1997     

Analysis of polyolefin blends by CRYSTAF

Crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) has been introduced for the analysis of the composition of polyolefin blends and the chemical composition distribution of polyolefins. Blends of syndiotactic and isotactic polypropylene (sPP and iPP) and of sPP/High density polyethylene (HDPE) have been fractionated by CRYSTAF and the results been compared to those from DSC. While the blends of sPP and HDPE cannot be separated by DSC a quantitative determination of both components is possible by CRYSTAF over the whole range with the detection limit being 1% on both ends. Furthermore it is demonstrated that the separation of ternary blends of sPP, iPP and HDPE is possible by CRYSTAF.     

Effect of compounding procedure on morphology and crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene/high‐density polyethylene/carbon black ternary composites

The effect of compounding procedure on morphology and crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene/high‐density polyethylene/carbon black (iPP/HDPE/CB) composite was investigated. iPP/HDPE/CB composites were prepared by four compounding procedures (A: iPP + HDPE + CB; B: iPP/HDPE + CB; C: HDPE/CB + iPP; D: iPP/CB + HDPE). Scanning electron microscopy observation showed that CB particles are mainly distributed in HDPE in all composites, and the phase morphology of composites was obviously affected by a compounding procedure. The size of the HDPE/CB domains in the composites prepared by procedures A and D decreased with the increase in CB content, whereas that of HDPE/CB in the composites prepared by procedures B and C rarely changed with the increase in CB content. The crystallization behaviors of the composites were significantly affected by their phase morphology, which resulted from the variation of compounding procedure. The isothermal crystallization rate of iPP in the composites prepared by procedures A and D was obviously increased, which may originate from the small HDPE/CB droplets dispersed in the iPP phase. The non‐isothermal crystallization curves of composites prepared by procedure D represented two peaks because the iPP component in these composites had the fastest crystallization rate, whereas the curves of composites prepared by other compounding sequences only exhibited one peak. Moreover, the crystallinity of HDPE almost increased by one time with the incorporation of only 1 phr CB because the CB particles selectively located in the HDPE phase, and the crystallinity of HDPE decreased with the further increase of CB content because of the strong restriction of CB on the HDPE chains. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

不同初始结构间规聚丙烯纤维熔融过程中的结晶转变行为

通过熔融纺丝及随后的热处理制备了具有不同初始结构的间规聚丙烯纤维(sPP).采用差示扫描量热仪(DSC)和变温广角X-射线衍射仪详细研究了sPP纤维在升温过程中的结构转变和熔融行为.结果表明,不同初始结构sPP纤维的晶型不同,卷绕纤维和退火处理纤维以Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型晶型为主,牵伸纤维介晶相占优;升高温度导致Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型两种晶型直接熔融,没有出现Ⅱ型向Ⅰ型的晶型转变;初始结构为介晶相的纤维在升温过程中部分介晶相直接转变为Ⅱ型晶型,还有一部分介晶相直接熔融,并在随后的升温过程中,形成Ⅰ型晶型.sPP纤维的多重熔融行为与其初始结构和纤维制备条件密切相关.     

CRYSTALLIZATION KINETICS OF SYNDIOTACTIC POLYPROPYLENE STUDIED BY TIME-DEPENDENT LIGHT ATTENUATION

Crystallization kinetics of syndiotactic polypropylene(sPP)was observed by light attenuation measurements. The initial stages of temperature dependent sPP crystallization fall in the range of Rayleigh scattering and Rayleigh-Debye- Gans scattering.Initial time and growth time of crystallization were obtained,and the trend of crystallization temperature dependent linear attenuation coefficient on the radius and the index of the refraction of the spherulite were evaluated.     

Thermal decomposition kinetics of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polypropylene nanocomposites

In this study, non-isothermal crystallization of neat high density polyethylene (HDPE) and HDPE/titanium dioxide (TiO₂) composite was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. Non-isothermal kinetic parameters were determined by Jeziorny approach and Mo’s method. Polarized optical microscopy and wide angle X-ray diffraction were applied to observe the crystal morphology and investigate the crystal structure, respectively. It was found TiO₂ particles could act as nucleating agent during the crystallization process and accelerate the crystallization rate. The Avrami index indicated nucleating type and growth of spherulite of HDPE was relatively simple. The result of activation energy indicated it was more and more difficult for the polymer chains to crystallize into the crystal lattice as the crystallization progressed. HDPE/TiO₂ composites exhibited lower ΔE values, suggesting TiO₂ particle could make the crystallization of HDPE easier. HDPE/TiO₂ composites had much smaller spherulite size than that of neat HDPE. HDPE formed more perfect crystal when TiO₂ particles were added into its matrix without changing the original crystal structure of HDPE.     

Crystallization of Polystyrene‐block‐[Syndiotactic Poly(propylene)] Block Copolymers from Confinement to Breakout

Summary: Various crystalline textures have been identified in a crystallizable block copolymer system, polystyrene‐block‐[syndiotactic poly(propylene)] (PS‐sPP), having a glass‐transition temperature of PS (T_g,PS) located in the midst of the sPP crystallization window. A confined morphology for the crystallization of sPP was observed while the crystallization temperature of sPP (T_c,sPP) was less than T_g,PS. A further increase in T_c,sPP could lead to a breakout in nanostructure. This study revealed the T_g effect on crystallization‐induced morphological changes of block copolymers from confinement to breakout.

TEM images and one‐dimensional SAXS profiles of PS‐sPP isothermally crystallized at T_ODT > T_g,PS > T_c,sPP (top) and T_ODT > T_c,sPP > T_g,PS (bottom).     

Influence of molecular characteristics on non-isothermal melt-crystallization kinetics of syndiotactic polypropylene

Non-isothermal melt-crystallization and subsequent melting behavior for six syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP) resins having different molecular characteristics were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). For a given sPP resin, the crystallization exotherm became wider and shifted towards a lower temperature with increasing cooling rate. Among all of the sPP resins investigated, the crystallization exotherm of sPP#11 was found to locate at the highest temperature range, followed by that of sPP#14, sPP#10, sPP#13, sPP#12, and sPP#9, respectively. Based on the absolute temperature scale, sPP#11 showed the highest tendency to start crystallizing during a cooling scan. The ability of these resins to start crystallizing was found to be very similar when the difference in the equilibrium melting temperature of the resins was taken into account. The non-isothermal melt-crystallization kinetics of these sPP resins was well described by the Avrami, Urbanovici–Segal, Ozawa, and Ziabicki models. The subsequent melting behavior of these sPP resins exhibited either a single melting endotherm or double melting endotherms.     

PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION ON THE MISCIBILITY OF ISOTACTIC POLYPROPYLENE （iPP） AND SYNDIOTACTIC POLYPROPYLENE （sPP） BLENDS

Experimental miscibility studies were performed on different compositions of iPP/sPP blends, where sPP has a low syndiotacticity （[rrrr] = 81%）. Combining optical microscopy, rheology, and solid state NMR spectroscopy, the miscibility of the blends was investigated at different scales in the traditionally thought to be ＂immiscible＂ iPP/sPP blends. For the composition of iPP/sPP （90/10） blend, it shows to be miscible in the melt, and furthermore, the existence of intermolecular chain interactions between sPP and iPP components was detected in the solid state.     

Probing Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of a Polyethylene Blend with Thermal Analysis

Summary: A series of polyethylene (PE) blends consisting of a high density polyethylene (HDPE) and a linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) with a butene-chain branch density of 77/1000 carbon was prepared at different concentrations. The LLDPE only crystallized below 50 °C, therefore, above 80 °C and below the melting temperature of HDPE, only HDPE crystallized in the PE blends. A specifically designed multi-step experimental procedure based on thermal analysis technique was utilized to monitor the liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) of this set of PE blends. The main step was first to quench the system from the homogeneous temperatures and isothermally anneal them at a prescribed temperature higher than the equilibrium melting temperature of the HDPE for the purpose of allowing the phase morphology to develop from LLPS, and then cool the system at constant rate to record the non-isothermal crystallization. The crystallization peak temperature (T_p) was used to character the crystallization rate. Because LLPS results in HDPE-rich domains where the crystallization rates are increased, this technique provided an experimental measure to identify the binodal curve of the LLPS for the system indicated by increased T_p. The result showed that the LLPS boundary of the blend measured by this method was close to that obtained by phase contrast optical microscopy method. Therefore, we considered that the thermal analysis technique based on the non-isothermal crystallization could be effective to investigate the LLPS of PE blends.     

Epitaxial behavior of HDPE on the boundary of highly oriented iPP substrates

The epitaxial crystallization behavior of high-density polyethylene on the boundary of highly oriented isotactic polypropylene (iPP) substrates has been investigated by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results obtained from AFM and TEM indicate that the epitaxial nucleation of HDPE on the highly oriented iPP substrates occurs earlier than that in the pure HDPE phase, i.e., homogeneous nucleation. Therefore the epitaxially grown HDPE lamellae can grow across the boundary of the iPP substrate into the HDPE spherulitic phase with the epitaxial orientation relationship remaining.     

Effects of crystallization temperature and blend ratio on the crystal structure of poly(butylene adipate) in the poly(butylene adipate)/poly(butylene succinate) blends

The effects of crystallization temperature and blend ratio on the polymorphic crystal structures of poly(butylene adipate)(PBA) in poly(butylene succinate)(PBS)/poly(butylene adipate)(PBS/PBA) blends were studied by means of differential scanning calorimetry(DSC), wide-angle X-ray diffraction(XRD) and atomic force microscopy(AFM). It was revealed that the polymorphism of PBA can be regulated by the blend ratio even in a non-isothermal crystallization process. The results demonstrate that high temperature favors flat-on α crystals, while low temperature contributes to edge-on β crystals. It was also found that the effect of blend ratio on the crystallization mechanism of PBA is well coincident with that of the crystallization temperature. The increment of PBS content in the PBS/PBA blend gives rise to more β-form crystals of PBA. For those PBS/PBA blends with low PBA content, the interlamellar phase segregation of PBA makes its molecular chains so difficult to diffuse from one isolated microdomain to another that high crystallization temperature and sufficiently long crystallization time will be required if the PBA α-type crystals are targeted.     

Mechanical properties and characterization of slowly cooled isotactic polypropylene/high‐density polyethylene blends

In previous studies, we found that Young's moduli of quenched isotactic polypropylene/high‐density polyethylene (iPP/HDPE) exceeded the upper bound, calculated from the Voigt model, with the moduli of the quenched homopolymers as those of the two components. We suggested that this might be due to crystallization, as the components crystallized at higher temperatures in the blend than on their own. We repeated the same set of measurements, this time on iPP/HDPE blends that were cooled slowly. We also examined crystallization at various rates of cooling with differential scanning calorimetry. At slow cooling rates, the HDPE and iPP components in the blends crystallize at lower temperatures than in the pure homopolymers, suggesting that the presence of one component inhibits rather than promotes the crystallization of the other. Electron microscopy of slowly cooled blends revealed very different interfacial morphologies depending on whether the HDPE or the iPP crystallizes first. Young's moduli of most of the blends lie on the upper bound; however, some blends with co‐continuous morphologies fall well below the lower bound. The mechanical properties are discussed in terms of the interfacial morphology, the crystallization behavior, and the large‐scale phase separation. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 1384–1392, 2003     

Influence of Titanium Dioxide Content on the Crystallization Behavior and Solar Reflectance of Polyethylene/Titanium Dioxide Composites

Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) particles were introduced to improve the solar reflectance of high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The organic-inorganic hybrids were fabricated by melt blending. A series of characterizations were taken to study the crystallization behavior, morphology, solar reflectance, and real cooling property. TiO₂ particles acted as nucleation agents in the HDPE matrix and made the HDPE form thick lamellar crystals. TiO₂ particles could disperse well into the HDPE matrix under 2.5 wt.% loading but agglomerated with 3 wt.%. Solar reflectance was related to the reflective index of TiO₂ and the microstructure of HDPE. The real cooling property depended on the solar reflectance and the dispersion of the TiO₂ particles in the HDPE matrix.