Etude des Signes des Constantes de Couplage 3J(P?X?C?H) et 4J(F?P?X?C?H) dans les Diaza-, Dioxa- et Dithiaphospholanes Fluores

The NMR spectra of the trivalent fluorophospholanes ( 1, 2, 3 ) have been analysed at length. The absolute signs of the ³J(P? H) and ⁴J(F? H) coupling constants have been referred to the known negative sign of the ¹J(P? F) coupling constant from selective heteronuclear double resonance experiments. The ³J(P? O? C? H) and ³J(P? N? C? H) coupling are positive. The weak values observed for ³J(P? S? C? H) have opposite signs, the larger being positive. All the ⁴J(F? P? X? C? H) coupling constants are positive showing a lack of stereospecificity.     

Etude par Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire de dérivés phosphores. Etude de dithiaphospholanes-1,3,2

The proton NMR spectral analysis of eight different 1,3,2-dithiaphospholanes with various groups attached to the phosphorus atom has been performed. The AA′BB′X (X phosphorus atom) system shows that the two ³J(P? S? C? H) coupling constants have a small magnitude and opposite signs. Using the ³J(HH) values, the torsion about the C₄—C₅ bond has been evaluated. The conformational requirements in the two isomers of the 2 phenyl-4-methyl-1,3,2-dithiaphospholane are also discussed.     

Dérivés Alléniques du Phosphore. Influence de l'État de Coordination du Phosphore et de la Nature des Radicaux Liés au Phosphore sur les Signes de J(P?H)

The signs of the phosphorus-proton coupling constants in various allenic organophosphorus compounds have been determined by either analysis of the AB₂X spectra or double resonance. Probable absolute signs have been obtained by taking ³J(P? H) as positive. In allenic phosphine oxides, the following signs are obtained: ²J(P? H) +ve, ³J(P? H) +ve, ⁴J(P? H) ?ve, ⁵J(P? H) +ve and the ⁴J(P? H) coupling constant varies mostly with the inductive effect of the substituents bound to the phosphorus atom. In allenic phosphines, these sings are: ²J(P? H) +ve, ³J(P? H) +ve, ⁴J(P? H) ?ve and +ve and the ⁴J(P? H) coupling constant varies with both the inductive and resonance effects to the substituents. This coupling constant is negative except when the phosphorus atom is bound to groups which are electron-donating by resonance effects. These results are discussed in relation to the pπ? dπ bonding in phosphine.     

Dérivés Alléniques de l'Étain,du Plomb et du Mercure. Signes Relatifs des Constantes de Couplage Métal-Proton á Travers Deux et Quatre Liaisons

Satellites corresponding to metal-proton coupling constants through two and four bonds are observed in PMR spectra of Pb, Sn and Hg allenic derivatives. The relative signs of these coupling constants are deduced from analysis of the satellite spectra: ²J(X? H) and ⁴J(X? H) are of opposite signs for X = ²⁰⁷Pb, ¹¹⁹Sn, ¹¹⁷Sn and of same sign for X = ¹⁹⁹Hg. Probable absolute signs of reduced coupling constants are discussed in relation to published data: ²K(X? C? H) is probably positive for X = ²⁰⁷Pb, ¹¹⁹Sn, ¹¹⁷Sn and ¹⁹⁹Hg. ⁴K(X? C?C?C? H) is probably negative for X = ²⁰⁷Pb, ¹¹⁹Sn, ¹¹⁷Sn and positive for X = ¹⁹⁹Hg.     

1H and 13C NMR study of α-acetylenic PIII and PIV derivatives. Signs and magnitudes of J(P?C) and J(P?H)

All J(P? H) and J(P? C) values, including signs, have been obtained in acetylenic and propynylic phosphorus derivatives, R₂P(X)? C?C? H and R₂P(X)? C?C? CH₃ (X ? oxygen, lone pair and R ? C₆H₅, N(CH₃)₂, OC₂H₅, N(C₆H₅)₂, Cl) from ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra. In P^IV derivatives the following signs are obtained: ¹J(P? C)+, ²J(P? C)+, ³J(P? C)+, ³J(P? H)+, ⁴J(P? H)? . Linear relations are observed between ¹J(P? C), ²J(P? C) and ³J(P? C) versus ³J(P? H), indicating that these coupling constants are mainly dependent on the Fermi contact term, though the other terms of the Ramsey theory do not seem to be negligible for ¹J(P? C) and ²J(P? C). In P^III derivatives these signs are: ¹J(P? C)- and +, ²J(P? C)+, ³J(P? C)-, ³J(P? H)-, ⁴J(P? H)+. Only ³J(P? C) and ³J(P? H) reflect a small contribution of the Fermi contact term while in ¹J(P? C) and ²J(P? C) this contribution seems to be negligible relative to the orbital and/or spin dipolar coupling mechanisms.     

Using (FH)2 and (FH)3 to Bridge the σ‐Hole and the Lone Pair at P in Complexes with H2XP,for X=CH3, OH,H, CCH,F, Cl,NC, and CN

Ab initio MP2/aug′‐cc‐pVTZ calculations are used to investigate the binary complexes H₂XP:HF, the ternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₂, and the quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃, for X=CH₃, OH, H, CCH, F, Cl, NC, and CN. Hydrogen‐bonded (HB) binary complexes are formed between all H₂XP molecules and FH, but only H₂FP, H₂ClP, and H₂(NC)P form pnicogen‐bonded (ZB) complexes with FH. Ternary complexes with (FH)₂ are stabilized by F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and F???P pnicogen bonds, except for H₂(CH₃)P:(FH)₂ and H₃P:(FH)₂, which do not have pnicogen bonds. All quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃ are stabilized by both F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and P???F pnicogen bonds. Thus, (FH)₂ with two exceptions, and (FH)₃ can bridge the σ‐hole and the lone pair at P in these complexes. The binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₃ complexes are significantly greater than the binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₂ complexes, and nonadditivities are synergistic in both series. Charge transfer occurs across all intermolecular bonds from the lone‐pair donor atom to an antibonding σ* orbital of the acceptor molecule, and stabilizes these complexes. Charge‐transfer energies across the pnicogen bond correlate with the intermolecular P?F distance, while charge‐transfer energies across F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds correlate with the distance between the lone‐pair donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded H atom. In binary and quaternary complexes, charge transfer energies also correlate with the distance between the electron‐donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded F atom. EOM‐CCSD spin‐spin coupling constants ^2hJ(F–P) across F?H???P hydrogen bonds, and ^1pJ(P–F) across pnicogen bonds in binary, ternary, and quaternary complexes exhibit strong correlations with the corresponding intermolecular distances. Hydrogen bonds are better transmitters of F–P coupling data than pnicogen bonds, despite the longer F???P distances in F?H???P hydrogen bonds compared to P???F pnicogen bonds. There is a correlation between the two bond coupling constants ^2hJ(F–F) in the quaternary complexes and the corresponding intermolecular distances, but not in the ternary complexes, a reflection of the distorted geometries of the bridging dimers in ternary complexes.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Reactivity of Cationic Gold Diarylallenylidene Complexes

Methoxide abstraction from gold acetylide complexes of the form (L)Au[η¹‐C≡CC(OMe)ArAr′] (L=IPr, P(^tBu)₂(ortho‐biphenyl); Ar/Ar′=C₆H₄X where X=H, Cl, Me, OMe) with trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (TMSOTf) at ?78 °C resulted in the formation of the corresponding cationic gold diarylallenylidene complexes [(L)Au=C=C=CArAr′]⁺ OTf^? in ≥85±5 % yield according to ¹H NMR analysis. ¹³C NMR and IR spectroscopic analysis of these complexes established the arene‐dependent delocalization of positive charge on both the C1 and C3 allenylidene carbon atoms. The diphenylallenylidene complex [(IPr)Au=C=C=CPh₂]⁺ OTf^? reacted with heteroatom nucleophiles at the allenylidene C1 and/or C3 carbon atom.     

Etude par resonance magnetique nucleaire des interactions noyau-substituant dans les acetanilides para-substitues

The NMR spectra of fifteen para-substituted acetanilides, XC₆H₄·NH·CO·CH₃ (X = NH·CO·Me; NH₂; CO·OEt; COOH; Cl; OEt; F; H; OMe; CH₃; NO₂; C₆H₅; ? N?N? C₆H₅; Me₃Si), have been recorded. δ and δ_NH are linearly related to Hammett's σ_p constant. The coupling J (o-H? H) between aromatic protons is mainly dependent on σ_R⁰. J(¹³C? H), in methyl group is approximatively constant in the series.     

The NMR spectra of some fluorinated pyridine derivatives

The ¹H and ¹⁹F spectra of a variety of mono- and di- fluorinated pyridines are examined, and compared with the corresponding spectra of the pyridinium ions. The magnitudes and signs of the ¹H? ¹⁹F coupling constants are in general in accord with those observed for the corresponding ¹H? ¹H couplings, with an exaggerated range. Large changes in the NMR parameters are observed on protonation of the nitrogen, ³J(H? F) changing sign in some of the α-fluoropyridine derivatives.     

A New Family of Trinuclear Nickel(II) Complexes as Single‐Molecule Magnets

Three new trinuclear nickel (II) complexes with the general composition [Ni₃L₃(OH)(X)](ClO₄) have been prepared in which X=Cl^? ( 1 ), OCN^? ( 2 ), or N₃^? ( 3 ) and HL is the tridentate N,N,O donor Schiff base ligand 2‐[(3‐dimethylaminopropylimino)methyl]phenol. Single‐crystal structural analyses revealed that all three complexes have a similar Ni₃ core motif with three different types of bridging, namely phenoxido (μ₂ and μ₃), hydroxido (μ₃), and μ₂‐Cl ( 1 ), μ_1,1‐NCO ( 2 ), or μ_1,1‐N₃ ( 3 ). The nickel(II) ions adopt a compressed octahedron geometry. Single‐crystal magnetization measurements on complex 1 revealed that the pseudo‐three‐fold axis of Ni₃ corresponds to a magnetic easy axis, being consistent with the magnetic anisotropy expected from the coordination structure of each nickel ion. Temperature‐dependent magnetic measurements indicated ferromagnetic coupling leading to an S=3 ground state with 2J/k=17, 17, and 28 K for 1 , 2 , and 3 , respectively, with the nickel atoms in an approximate equilateral triangle. The high‐frequency EPR spectra in combination with spin Hamiltonian simulations that include zero‐field splitting parameters D_Ni/k=?5, ?4, and ?4 K for 1 , 2 , and 3 , respectively, reproduced the EPR spectra well after a anisotropic exchange term was introduced. Anisotropic exchange was identified as D_i,j/k=?0.9, ?0.8, and ?0.8 K for 1 , 2 , and 3 , respectively, whereas no evidence of single‐ion rhombic anisotropy was observed spectroscopically. Slow relaxation of the magnetization at low temperatures is evident from the frequency‐dependence of the out‐of‐phase ac susceptibilities. Pulsed‐field magnetization recorded at 0.5 K shows clear steps in the hysteresis loop at 0.5–1 T, which has been assigned to quantum tunneling, and is characteristic of single‐molecule magnets.     

Columnar Mesophases Controlled by Counterions in Potassium Complexes of Dibenzo[18]crown‐6 Derivatives

Dibenzo[18]crown‐6 derivatives 1 with two lateral tetraalkyloxy o‐terphenyl units were prepared and converted to the corresponding complexes KX ?1 (X=halide, BF₄, PF₆, SCN) and NH₄PF₆ ?1 . Complexation was probed by MALDI‐TOF spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy. Downfield shifts of ¹H NMR signals for complexes with soft anions Br, I, SCN, and PF₆ indicated the presence of tight ion pairs, whereas complexes with hard anions F, Cl, or BF₄ showed no or little shifts. In ¹³C NMR spectra, upfield shifts were detected for soft anions. The character of the anion also influenced the mesomorphic properties of complexes MX ?1 (M=K, NH₄), which were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarizing optical microscopy (POM), and XRD in comparison to neat 1 . Hard anions slightly stabilize or even destabilize the mesophase. Soft anions, however, improve the mesomorphic properties yielding mesophases with up to 70 °C phase widths in the case of KI ?1 , KPF₆ ?1 , and NH₄PF₆ ?1 . For complexes KSCN ?1 with a soft and bridging anion, the balance between mesophase stabilization and high order is shifted in favor of the plastic crystal phase.     

The Importance of Ligand-Induced Backdonation in the Stabilization of Square Planar d10 Nickel π-Complexes

The electronic nature of Ni π-complexes is underexplored even though these complexes have been widely postulated as intermediates in organometallic chemistry. Herein, the geometric and electronic structure of a series of nickel π-complexes, Ni(dtbpe)(X) (dtbpe=1,2-bis(di-tert-butyl)phosphinoethane; X=alkene or carbonyl containing π-ligands), is probed using a combination of ³¹P NMR, Ni K-edge XAS, Ni K_β XES, and DFT calculations. These complexes are best described as square planar d¹⁰ complexes with π-backbonding acting as the dominant contributor to M−L bonding to the π-ligand. The degree of backbonding correlates with ²J_PP from NMR and the energy of the Ni 1s→4p_z pre-edge in the Ni K-edge XAS data, and is determined by the energy of the π*_ip ligand acceptor orbital. Thus, unactivated olefinic ligands tend to be poor π-acids whereas ketones, aldehydes, and esters allow for greater backbonding. However, backbonding is still significant even in cases in which metal contributions are minor. In such cases, backbonding is dominated by charge donation from the diphosphine, which allows for strong backdonation, although the metal centre retains a formal d¹⁰ electronic configuration. This ligand-induced backbonding can be formally described as a 3-centre-4-electron (3c-4e) interaction, in which the nickel centre mediates charge transfer from the phosphine σ-donors to the π*_ip ligand acceptor orbital. The implications of this bonding motif are described with respect to both structure and reactivity.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Reactivity of Cationic Gold Diarylallenylidene Complexes

Methoxide abstraction from gold acetylide complexes of the form (L)Au[η¹‐C≡CC(OMe)ArAr′] (L=IPr, P(^tBu)₂(ortho‐biphenyl); Ar/Ar′=C₆H₄X where X=H, Cl, Me, OMe) with trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (TMSOTf) at −78 °C resulted in the formation of the corresponding cationic gold diarylallenylidene complexes [(L)Au=C=C=CArAr′]⁺ OTf⁻ in ≥85±5 % yield according to ¹H NMR analysis. ¹³C NMR and IR spectroscopic analysis of these complexes established the arene‐dependent delocalization of positive charge on both the C1 and C3 allenylidene carbon atoms. The diphenylallenylidene complex [(IPr)Au=C=C=CPh₂]⁺ OTf⁻ reacted with heteroatom nucleophiles at the allenylidene C1 and/or C3 carbon atom.     

Interactions Intramolécularies—XVII Calcul des constantes de couplage en RMN du cyclohexane et de cyclohexanes substitués. Comparaison des méthodes de Pople et Santry et des perturbations finies

Proton–proton ³J, ⁴J and ⁵J NMR coupling constants have been calculated for cyclohexane and monosubstituted cyclohexane conformers (substitiuents: Li, CH₃, OH, F) by the two methods mentioned. Comparing the two methods on the basis of group theory, we show the necessity to use the second. The results from this method are compared with those of the literature.     

31P-NMR and X-Ray Studies of the Complexes [HgX2 (1)]. (1=2, 11-bis (diphenylphosphinomethyl)benzo [c]phenanthrene,X=Cl,I)

The ³¹P{¹H}-NMR characteristics of the complexes [HgX₂( 1 )] and [HgX₂-(PPh₂Bz)₂] (X = NO₃, Cl, Br, I, SCN, CN) and the solid state structures of the complexes [HgCl₂( 1 )] and [HgI₂( 1 )] ( 1 = 2,11-bis (diphenylphosphinomethyl)benzo-[c]phenanthrene) have been determined. The ¹J(¹⁹⁹Hg, ³¹P) values increase in the order CN < I < SCN < Br < Cl < NO₃. The two molecular structures show a distorted tetrahedral geometry about mercury. Pertinent bond lengths and bond angles from the X-ray analysis are as follows: Hg? P = 2.485(7) Å and 2.509 (8) Å, Hg? Cl = 2.525 (8) Å and 2.505 (10) Å, P? Hg? P = 125.6(3)°, Cl? Hg? Cl = 97.0(3)° for [HgCl₂( 1 )] and Hg? P = 2.491 (10) Å and 2.500(11) Å, Hg? I = 2.858(5) Å and 2.832(3) Å, P? Hg? P = 146.0(4)°, I? Hg? I = 116.9(1)° for [HgI₂( 1 )]. The equation, derived previously, relating ¹J(¹⁹⁹Hg, ³¹P) and the angles P? Hg? P and X? Hg? X is shown to be valid for 1 .     

Tin(II) Halide Insertion or Halogen Exchange in the Reactions of Dihaloplatinum(II) Complexes with Tin(II) Halide

Reactions of SnCl₂ with the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf (1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene), dppp (1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane=1,1′‐(propane‐1,3‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppb (1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane=1,1′‐(butane‐1,4‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), and dpppe (1,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)pentane=1,1′‐(pentane‐1,5‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine])) resulted in the insertion of SnCl₂ into the Pt? Cl bond to afford the cis‐[PtCl(SnCl₃)(P₂)] complexes. However, the reaction of the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf, dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane=1,1′‐methylenebis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppe (1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane=1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppp, dppb, and dpppe; P=Ph₃P and (MeO)₃P) with SnX₂ (X=Br or I) resulted in the halogen exchange to yield the complexes [PtX₂(P₂)]. In contrast, treatment of cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)] with SnBr₂ resulted in the insertion of SnBr₂ into the Pt? Br bond to form cis‐[Pt(SnBr₃)₂(dppm)], and this product was in equilibrium with the starting complex cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)]. Moreover, the reaction of cis‐[PtCl₂(dppb)] with a mixture SnCl₂/SnI₂ in a 2 : 1 mol ratio resulted in the formation of cis‐[PtI₂(dppb)] as a consequence of the selective halogen‐exchange reaction. ³¹P‐NMR Data for all complexes are reported, and a correlation between the chemical shifts and the coupling constants was established for mono‐ and bis(trichlorostannyl)platinum complexes. The effect of the alkane chain length of the ligand and Sn^II halide is described.     

Neutral Hexacoordinate Tin(IV) Halide Complexes with 4,4'-Dimethy-2,2'-bipyridine

A series of three neutral, hexacoordinate tin(IV) complexes were synthesized by the reaction of 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine (DMB) with SnX₄, X = Cl, Br, and I, as starting materials. The complexes (DMB)SnX₄ were characterized in solution by ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy, and in the solid-state by ¹¹⁹Sn MAS NMR spectroscopy. In addition, single-crystal X-ray diffraction and elemental analysis were used to confirm the molecular structures. In these complexes, the tin atom adopts a distorted octahedral arrangement and the DMB acts as a bidentate N,N'-chelate ligand. Computational DFT methods were also employed to gain more insight into the nature of the bonding in these complexes, including the hypothetical complexes (DMB)SnX₄ (X = F, At). Additionally, the validity and reliability of the ¹¹⁹Sn NMR chemical shifts were examined. The calculated values were compared with the experimental signals and the effects of structure and solvent are discussed. Finally, all of the complexes (DMB)SnX₄ were successfully tested for the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of bulk ε-caprolactone under non-dried and aerobic conditions as precatalyst.     

Chiral η6‐Arene/N‐Tosylethylenediamine–Ruthenium(II) Complexes: Solution Behavior and Catalytic Activity for Asymmetric Hydrogenation

Aromatic ketones are enantioseletively hydrogenated in alcohols containing [RuX{(S,S)‐Tsdpen}(η⁶‐p‐cymene)] (Tsdpen=TsNCH(C₆H₅)CH(C₆H₅)NH₂; X=TfO, Cl) as precatalysts. The corresponding Ru hydride (X=H) acts as a reducing species. The solution structures and complete spectral assignment of these complexes have been determined using 2D NMR (¹H‐¹H DQF‐COSY, ¹H‐¹³C HMQC, ¹H‐¹⁵N HSQC, and ¹H‐¹⁹F HOESY). Depending on the nature of the solvents and conditions, the precatalysts exist as a covalently bound complex, tight ion pair of [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and X^?, solvent‐separated ion pair, or discrete free ions. Solvent effects on the NH₂ chemical shifts of the Ru complexes and the hydrodynamic radius and volume of the Ru⁺ and TfO^? ions elucidate the process of precatalyst activation for hydrogenation. Most notably, the Ru triflate possessing a high ionizability, substantiated by cyclic voltammetry, exists in alcoholic solvents largely as a solvent‐separated ion pair and/or free ions. Accordingly, its diffusion‐derived data in CD₃OD reflect the independent motion of [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and TfO^?. In CDCl₃, the complex largely retains the covalent structure showing similar diffusion data for the cation and anion. The Ru triflate and chloride show similar but distinct solution behavior in various solvents. Conductivity measurements and catalytic behavior demonstrate that both complexes ionize in CH₃OH to generate a common [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and X^?, although the extent is significantly greater for X=TfO^?. The activation of [RuX(Tsdpen)(cymene)] during catalytic hydrogenation in alcoholic solvent occurs by simple ionization to generate [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)]. The catalytic activity is thus significantly influenced by the reaction conditions.     

Protonenresonanz-Spektroskopie ungesättigter Ringsysteme—XVI 7,7-Difluor-benzo-cyclopropen

The NMR-spectrum of 7·7-difluoro-benzo-cyclopropene ( 2 ) has been analysed to obtain chemical shifts and spin, spin-coupling constants: δ_AA′ = 7·6026, δ_BB′ = 7·4834 ppm; J_AB = 6·86, J_AA′ = 7·45, J_AB′ = 0·34 and J_BB′ = 1·89 Hz. Heteronuclear double resonance experiments have been used to establish a positive sign for ⁴J(H? F) (3.64 Hz) and a negative sign for ⁵J(H? F) (?0·33 Hz) in this molecule. The results are discussed with reference to the structure of 2 and the NMR data found for benzo-cyclopropene.     

Strong Antiferromagnetic Exchange Interactions in Cobalt(II) Complexes with 2-Pyridyl Substituted Nitronyl Nitroxide Ligand

Three new complexes, [Co(hfac)₂(NIToPy)] (1), [CoCl₂(NIToPy)₂] (2), and [Co(NIToPy)₃](ClO₄)₂ (3), with NIToPy = 2-(2-Pyridyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazolyl-oxy-3-oxide, and hfac = hexafluoroacetylacetonate, have been synthesized. The compound 3 crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁, with two molecules in a unit cell of dimensions a = 10.565(4) Å, b = 14.714(9) Å, c = 14.596(7) Å, and β = 107.10(4)°. The temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements (4.2 K-300 K) for the complexes demonstrated strong antiferromagnetic exchange interaction between cobalt(II) ion and NIToPy radical spins with J = ?140.1 cm^?1 for 1, J = ?94.2 cm^?1 for 2, and J = ?161.8 cm^?1 for 3, respectively. The magneto-structural correlation in these complexes has been discussed.