Electronic structure of nitric oxide adducts of bis(diaryl-1,2-dithiolene)iron compounds: four-membered electron-transfer series [Fe(NO)(L)2]z (z = 1+, 0, 1-, 2-)

Four members of the electron-transfer series [Fe(NO)(S(2)C(2)R(2))2]z (z = 1+, 0, 1-, 2-) have been isolated as solid materials (R = p-tolyl): [1a](BF4), [1a]0, [Co(Cp)2][1a], and [Co(Cp)2]2[1a]. In addition, complexes [2a]0 (R = 4,4-diphenyl), [3a]0 (R = p-methoxyphenyl), [Et(4)N][4a] (R = phenyl), and [PPh(4)][5a] (R = -CN) have been synthesized and the members of each of their electron-transfer series electrochemically generated in CH(2)Cl(2) solution. All species have been characterized electro- and magnetochemically. Their electronic, M?ssbauer, and electron paramagnetic resonance spectra as well as their infrared spectra have been recorded in order to elucidate the electronic structure of each member of the electron-transfer series. It is shown that the monocationic, neutral, and monoanionic species possess an {FeNO}6 (S = 0) moiety where the redox chemistry is sulfur ligand-based, (L)2-(L*)1-: [Fe(NO)(L*)2]+ (S = 0), [Fe(NO)(L*)(L)]0 <--> [Fe(NO)(L)(L*)]0 (S = 1/2), [Fe(NO)(L)2]- (S = 0). Further one-electron reduction generates a dianion with an {FeNO}7 (S = 1/2) unit and two fully reduced, diamagnetic dianions L2-: [Fe(NO)(L)2]2- (S = 1/2).     

Nitrosyliron(III) porphyrinates: porphyrin core conformation and FeNO geometry. Any correlation?

The synthesis, structural, and spectroscopic characterization of (nitrosyl)iron(III) porphyrinate complexes designed to have strongly nonplanar porphyrin core conformations is reported. The species have a nitrogen-donor axial ligand trans to the nitrosyl ligand and display planar as well as highly nonplanar porphyrin core conformations. The systems were designed to test the idea, expressly discussed for the heme protein nitrophorin (Roberts, et al. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 11327), that porphyrin core distortions could lead to an unexpected, bent geometry for the FeNO group. For [Fe(OETPP)(1-MeIm)(NO)]ClO(4).C(6)H(5)Cl (H(2)OETPP = octaethyltetraphenylporphyrin), the porphyrin core is found to be severely saddled. However, this distortion has little or no effect on the geometric parameters of the coordination group: Fe-N(p) = 1.990(9) A, Fe-N(NO) = 1.650(2) A, Fe-N(L) = 1.983(2) A, and Fe-N-O = 177.0(3) degrees. For the complex [Fe(OEP)(2-MeHIm)(NO)]ClO(4).0.5CH(2)Cl(2) (H(2)OEP = octaethylporphyrin), there are two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. The cation denoted [Fe(OEP)(2-MeHIm)(NO)](+)(pla) has a close-to-planar porphyrin core. For this cation, Fe-N(p) = 2.014(8) A, Fe-N(NO) = 1.649(2) A, Fe-N(L) = 2.053(2) A, and Fe-N-O = 175.6(2) degrees. The second cation, [Fe(OEP)(2-MeHIm)(NO)](+)(ruf), has a ruffled core: Fe-N(p) = 2.003(7) A, Fe-N(NO) = 1.648(2) A, Fe-N(L) = 2.032(2) A, and Fe-N-O = 177.4(2) degrees. Thus, there is no effect on the coordination group geometry caused by either type of nonplanar core deformation; it is unlikely that a protein engendered core deformation would cause FeNO bending either. The solid-state nitrosyl stretching frequencies of 1917 cm(-)(1) for [Fe(OEP)(2-MeHIm)(NO)]ClO(4) and 1871 cm(-)(1) for [Fe(OETPP)(1-MeIm)(NO)]ClO(4) are well within the range seen for linear Fe-N-O groups. M?ssbauer data for [Fe(OEP)(2-MeHIm)(NO)]ClO(4) confirm that the ground state is diamagnetic. In addition, the quadrupole splitting value of 1.88 mm/s and isomer shift (0.05 mm/s) at 4.2 K are similar to other (nitrosyl)iron(III) porphyrin complexes with linear Fe-N-O groups. Crystal data: [Fe(OETPP)(1-MeIm)(NO)]ClO(4).C(6)H(5)Cl, monoclinic, space group P2(1)/c, Z = 4, with a = 12.9829(6) A, b = 36.305(2) A, c = 14.0126(6) A, beta = 108.087(1) degrees; [Fe(OEP)(2-MeHIm)(NO)]ClO(4).0.5CH(2)Cl(2), triclinic, space group Ponemacr;, Z = 4, with a = 14.062(2) A, b = 16.175(3) A, c = 19.948(3) A, alpha = 69.427(3) degrees, beta = 71.504(3) degrees, gamma = 89.054(3) degrees.     

A Carboxylate-Bridged Non-Heme Diiron Dinitrosyl Complex

The reaction of nitric oxide with the carboxylate-bridged diiron(II) complex [Fe(2)(Et-HPTB)(O(2)CPh)](BF(4))(2) (1a) afforded the dinitrosyl adduct, [Fe(2)(NO)(2)(Et-HPTB)(O(2)CPh)](BF(4))(2) (1b), where Et-HPTB = N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(N-ethyl-2-benzimidazolylmethyl)-2-hydroxy-1,3-diaminopropane, in 69% yield. Compound 1b further reacts with dioxygen to form the bis(nitrato) complex, [Fe(2)(Et-HPTB)(NO(3))(2)(OH)](BF(4))(2) (1c). The structure of 1b was determined by X-ray crystallography (triclinic, P&onemacr;, a = 13.5765(8) ?, b = 15.4088(10) ?, c = 16.2145(10) ?, alpha = 73.656(1) degrees, beta = 73.546(1) degrees, gamma = 73.499(1) degrees, V = 3043.8(7) ?(3), T = -80 degrees C, Z = 2, and R = 0.085 and R(w) = 0.095 for 5644 independent reflections with I > 3sigma(I)). The two nitrosyl units are equivalent with an average Fe-N-O angle of 167.4 +/- 0.8 degrees. Spectroscopic characterization of solid 1b revealed an NO stretch at 1785 cm(-)(1) in the infrared and M?ssbauer parameters of delta = 0.67 mm s(-)(1) and DeltaE(Q) = 1.44 mm s(-)(1) at 4.2 K. These data are comparable to those for other {FeNO}(7) systems. An S = (3)/(2) spin state was assigned from magnetic susceptibility studies to the two individual {FeNO} centers, each of which has a nitrosyl ligand antiferromagnetically coupled to iron. A least-squares fit of the chi vs temperature plots to a theoretical model yielded an exchange coupling constant J of -23 cm(-)(1), where H = -2JS(1).S(2), indicating that the two S = (3)/(2) centers are antiferromagnetically coupled to one another. An extended Hückel calculation on a model complex, [Fe(2)(NO)(2)(NH(3))(6)(O(2)CH)(OH)](2+), revealed that the magnitudes of Fe-N-O angles are dictated by pi-bonding interactions between the Fe d(xz)() and NO pi orbitals.     

Influence of thiolate ligands on reductive N-O bond activation. Probing the O2(-) binding site of a biomimetic superoxide reductase analogue and examining the proton-dependent reduction of nitrite

Nitric oxide (NO) is frequently used to probe the substrate-binding site of "spectroscopically silent" non-heme Fe(2+) sites of metalloenzymes, such as superoxide reductase (SOR). Herein we use NO to probe the superoxide binding site of our thiolate-ligated biomimetic SOR model [Fe(II)(S(Me(2))N(4)(tren))](+) (1). Like NO-bound trans-cysteinate-ligated SOR (SOR-NO), the rhombic S = 3/2 EPR signal of NO-bound cis-thiolate-ligated [Fe(S(Me(2))N(4)(tren)(NO)](+) (2; g = 4.44, 3.54, 1.97), the isotopically sensitive ν(NO)(ν((15)NO)) stretching frequency (1685(1640) cm(-1)), and the 0.05 ? decrease in Fe-S bond length are shown to be consistent with the oxidative addition of NO to Fe(II) to afford an Fe(III)-NO(-) {FeNO}(7) species containing high-spin (S = 5/2) Fe(III) antiferromagnetically coupled to NO(-) (S = 1). The cis versus trans positioning of the thiolate does not appear to influence these properties. Although it has yet to be crystallographically characterized, SOR-NO is presumed to possess a bent Fe-NO similar to that of 2 (Fe-N-O = 151.7(4)°). The N-O bond is shown to be more activated in 2 relative to N- and O-ligated {FeNO}(7) complexes, and this is attributed to the electron-donating properties of the thiolate ligand. Hydrogen-bonding to the cysteinate sulfur attenuates N-O bond activation in SOR, as shown by its higher ν(NO) frequency (1721 cm(-1)). In contrast, the ν(O-O) frequency of the SOR peroxo intermediate and its analogues is not affected by H-bonds to the cysteinate sulfur or other factors influencing the Fe-SR bond strength; these only influence the ν(Fe-O) frequency. Reactions between 1 and NO(2)(-) are shown to result in the proton-dependent heterolytic cleavage of an N-O bond. The mechanism of this reaction is proposed to involve both Fe(II)-NO(2)(-) and {FeNO}(6) intermediates similar to those implicated in the mechanism of NiR-promoted NO(2)(-) reduction.     

Dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNICs) [L(2)Fe(NO)2]- (L = thiolate): interconversion among {Fe(NO)2}9 DNICs, {Fe(NO)2}10 DNICs, and [2Fe-2S] clusters, and the critical role of the thiolate ligands in regulating NO release of DNICs

Dinitrosyl iron complex [(-SC(7)H(4)SN)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-) (1) was prepared by reaction of [S(5)Fe(NO)(2)](-) and bis(2-benzothiozolyl) disulfide. In synthesis of the analogous dinitrosyl iron compounds (DNICs), the stronger electron-donating thiolates [RS](-) (R = C(6)H(4)-o-NHCOCH(3), C(4)H(3)S, C(6)H(4)NH(2), Ph), compared to [-SC(7)H(4)SN](-) of complex 1, trigger thiolate-ligand substitution to yield [(-SC(6)H(4)-o-NHCOCH(3))(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-) (2), [(-SC(4)H(3)S)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-) (3), and [(SPh)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-) (4), respectively. At 298 K, complexes 2 and 3 exhibit a well-resolved five-line EPR signal at g = 2.038 and 2.027, respectively, the characteristic g value of DNICs. The magnetic susceptibility fit indicates that the resonance hybrid of {Fe(+)((*)NO)(2)}(9) and {Fe(-)((+)NO)(2)}(9) in 2 is dynamic by temperature. The IR nu(NO) stretching frequencies (ranging from (1766, 1716) to (1737, 1693) cm(-)(1) (THF)) of complexes 1-4 signal the entire window of possible electronic configurations for such stable and isolable {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) [(RS)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-). The NO-releasing ability of {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) [(RS)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-) is finely tuned by the coordinated thiolate ligands. The less electron-donating thiolate ligands coordinated to {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) motif act as better NO-donor DNICs in the presence of NO-trapping agent [Fe(S,S-C(6)H(4))(2)](2)(2-). Interconversion between {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) [(RS)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-) and {Fe(NO)(2)}(10) [(Ph(3)P)(2)Fe(NO)(2)] was verified in the reaction of (a) [(RS)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-), 10 equiv of PPh(3) and sodium-biphenyl, and (b) 2 equiv of thiol, [RS](-), and [(Ph(3)P)(2)Fe(NO)(2)], respectively. The biomimetic reaction cycle, transformation between {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) [(RS)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-) and {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) [(R'S)(2)Fe(NO)(2)](-), reversible interconversion of {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) and {Fe(NO)(2)}(10) DNICs, and degradation/reassembly of [2Fe-2S] clusters may decipher and predict the biological cycle of interconversion of {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) DNICs, {Fe(NO)(2)}(10) DNICs, and the [Fe-S] clusters in proteins.     

1,2,4-Triazole functionalized adamantanes: a new library of polydentate tectons for designing structures of coordination polymers

A series of functionalized adamantanes: 1,3-bis(1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)(tr(2)ad); 1,3,5-tris(1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)-(tr(3)ad); 1,3,5,7-tetrakis(1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)adamantanes (tr(4)ad) and 3,5,7-tris(1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)-1-azaadamantane (tr(3)ada) were developed as a new family of geometrically rigid polydentate tectons for supramolecular synthesis of framework solids. The coordination compounds were prepared under hydrothermal conditions; their structures reveal a special potential of the triazolyl adamantanes for the generation of highly-connected and open frameworks as well as structures based upon polynuclear metal clusters assembled with short-distance N(1),N(2)-triazole bridges. Complexes [Cd{L}(2)]A·nH(2)O [L = tr(3)ad, A = 2NO(3)(-) (4), CdCl(4)(2-) (5); L = tr(3)ada, A = CdI(4)(2-) (7)] are isomorphous and adopt a layered 3,6-connected structure of CdI(2) type. [{Cu(3)(OH)}(2)(SO(4))(5)(H(2)O)(2){tr(3)ad}(3)]·26H(2)O (6) is a layered polymer based upon Cu(3)(μ(3)-OH) nodes and trigonal tr(3)ad links. In [Cu(3)(OH)(2){tr(3)ada}(2)(H(2)O)(4)](ClO(4))(4) (8), [Cu(2){tr(3)ada}(2)(H(2)O)(3)](SO(4))(2)·7H(2)O (9) and [Cd(2){tr(3)ada}(3)]Cl(4)·28H(2)O (10) (UCl(3)-type net) the organic tripodal ligands bridge polynuclear metal clusters. Complexes [Ag{tr(4)ad}]NO(3)·3.5H(2)O (11) and [Cu{tr(4)ad}(H(2)O)](ClO(4))(2)·3H(2)O (12) have 3D SrAl(2)-type frameworks with the metal ions and adamantane tectons as topologically equivalent tetrahedral nodes, while in [Cd(3)Cl(6){tr(4)ad}(2)]·9H(2)O (13) the ligands bridge trinuclear six-connected Cd(3)Cl(6)(μ-tr)(4)(tr)(2) clusters. In the compounds [Cd(2){tr(2)ad}(4)(H(2)O)(4)](CdBr(4))(2)·2H(2)O (2) and [Cd{tr(2)ad}(4){CdI(3)}(2)]·4H(2)O (3) the bitopic ligands provide simple links between the metal ions, while in [Ag(2){tr(2)ad}(2)](NO(3))(2)·2H(2)O (1) the ligand is tetradentate and generates a 3D framework.     

The challenge of being straight: explaining the linearity of a low-spin [FeNO]7 unit in a tropocoronand complex

We have carried out a density functional theory study of the S = 1/2 [FeNO]7 tropocoronand complex, Fe(5,5-TC)NO, as well as of some simplified models of this compound. The calculations accurately reproduce the experimentally observed trigonal-bipyramidal geometry of this complex, featuring a linear NO in an equatorial position and a very short Fe-N(NO) distance. Despite these unique structural features, the qualitative features of the bonding turn out to be rather similar for Fe(5,5-TC)NO and [FeNO]7 porphyrins. Thus, there is a close correspondence between the molecular orbitals (MOs) in the two cases. However, there is a critical, if somewhat subtle, difference in the nature of the singly occupied MOs (SOMOs) between the two. For square-pyramidal heme-NO complexes, the SOMO is primarily Fe d(z)2-based, which favors sigma-bonding interactions with an NO pi orbital, and hence a bent FeNO unit. However, for trigonal-bipyramidal Fe(5,5-TC)(NO), the SOMO is best described as primarily Fe d(x2-z2) in character, with the Fe-N(NO) vector being identified as the z direction. Apparently, such a d orbital is less adept at sigma bonding with NO and, as such, pi bonding dominates the Fe-NO interaction, leading to an essentially linear FeNO unit and a short Fe-N(NO) distance.     

Structural and electronic characterization of nitrosyl(octaethylporphinato)iron(III) perchlorate derivatives

The synthesis and crystallographic characterization of the five-coordinate iron(III) porphyrinate complex [Fe(OEP)(NO)]ClO4 are reported. This [FeNO]6 complex has a nearly linear Fe-N-O group (angle = 173.19(13) degrees) with a small off-axis tilt of the Fe-N(NO) vector from the heme normal (angle = 4.6 degrees); the Fe-N(NO) distance is 1.6528(13) A and the iron is displaced 0.32 A out-of-plane. The complex forms a tight cofacial pi-pi dimer in the solid state. M?ssbauer spectra for this derivative as well as for a related crystalline form are measured both in zero applied magnetic field and in a 7 T applied field. Fits to the measurements made in applied magnetic field demonstrate that both crystalline forms of [Fe(OEP)(NO)]ClO4 have a diamagnetic ground state at 4.2 K. The observed isomer shifts (delta = 0.22-0.24 mm/s) are smaller than those typically observed for low-spin iron(III) porphyrinates. Analogous M?ssbauer measurements are also obtained for a six-coordinate derivative, [Fe(OEP)(Iz)(NO)]ClO4 (Iz = indazole). The observed isomer shift for this species is smaller still (delta = 0.02 mm/s). All derivatives show a strong temperature dependence of the isomer shift. The data emphasize the strongly covalent nature of the FeNO group. The M?ssbauer isomer shifts suggest formal oxidation states greater than +3 for iron, but the NO stretching frequencies are not consistent with such a large charge transfer to NO. Differences in the observed nitrosyl stretching frequencies of the two crystalline forms of [Fe(OEP)(NO)]ClO4 are discussed.     

Regioselective nucleophilic addition of triphenylphosphine to the nitrosylruthenium alkynyl complexes having a hydrotris(pyrazol-1-yl)borate: formation of phosphonio-alkenyl, alkynyl, and allenyl species

A nitrosylruthenium alkynyl complex of TpRuCl(C[triple bond]CPh)(NO)(1a) was reacted with PPh3 in the presence of HBF4.Et2O at room temperature to give a beta-phosphonio-alkenyl complex (E)-[TpRuCl{CH=C(PPh3)Ph}(NO)]BF4(2.BF4). On the other hand, for gamma-hydroxyalkynyl complexes TpRuCl{C[triple bond]CC(R)2OH}(NO)(R = Me (1b), Ph (1c), H (1d)), similar treatments with PPh3 were found to give gamma-phosphonio-alkynyl [TpRuCl{C[triple bond]CC(Me)2PPh3}(NO)]BF4(3.BF4),alpha-phosphonio-allenyl [TpRuCl{C(PPh3)=C=CPh2}(NO)]BF4(4.BF4), and a novel product of gamma-hydroxy-beta-phosphonio-alkenyl (E)-[TpRuCl{CH=C(PPh3)CH2OH}(NO)]BF4(5.BF4), respectively. Dominant factors for the selectivity in affording 3-5 were associated with the steric congestion and electronic properties at the gamma-carbons, along with those around the metal fragment. From the bis(alkynyl) complex TpRu(C[triple bond]CPh)2(NO)6, a bis(beta-phosphonio-alkenyl)(E,E)-[TpRu{CH=C(PPh3)Ph}2(NO)](BF4)2{7.(BF4)2} was produced at room temperature. However, similar reactions at 0 degrees C gave an alkynyl beta-phosphonio-alkenyl complex (E)-[TpRu(C[triple bondCPh){CH=C(PPh3)Ph}(NO)]BF4(8.BF4) as a sole product, of which additional hydration in the presence of HBF4.Et2O afforded a [small beta]-phosphonio-alkenyl ketonyl (E)-[TpRu{CH2C(O)Ph}{CH=C(PPh3)Ph}(NO)]BF(.9BF4). Five complexes, 2-5 and 7 were crystallographically characterized.     

Unusual role of solvents in the syntheses of {Fe-NO}6,7 nitrosyls derived from a ligand with carboxamido nitrogen and thiolato sulfur donors

Reaction of excess NO with the S = 3/2 Fe(III) complex (Et4N)2[Fe(PhPepS)(Cl)] (1) in protic solvents such as MeOH affords the {Fe-NO}(7) nitrosyl (Et(4)N)(2)[Fe(PhPepS)(NO)] (2). This distorted square-pyramidal S = 1/2 complex, a product of reductive nitrosylation, is the first example of an {Fe-NO}7 nitrosyl with carboxamido-N and thiolato-S coordination. When the same reaction is performed in aprotic solvents such as MeCN and DMF, the product is a dimeric diamagnetic {Fe-NO}6 complex, (Et4N)2-[{Fe(PhPepS)(NO)}2] (3). Both electrochemical and chemical oxidation of 2 leads to the formation of 3 via a transient five-coordinate {Fe-NO}6 intermediate. The oxidation is NO-centered. The ligand frame is not attacked by excess NO in these reactions.     

Insight into the dinuclear {Fe(NO)2}10{Fe(NO)2}10 and mononuclear {Fe(NO)2}10 dinitrosyliron complexes

The reversible redox transformations [(NO)(2)Fe(S(t)Bu)(2)](-) ? [Fe(μ-S(t)Bu)(NO)(2)](2)(2-) ? [Fe(μ-S(t)Bu)(NO)(2)](2)(-) ? [Fe(μ-S(t)Bu)(NO)(2)](2) and [cation][(NO)(2)Fe(SEt)(2)] ? [cation](2)[(NO)(2)Fe(SEt)(2)] (cation = K(+)-18-crown-6 ether) are demonstrated. The countercation of the {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) dinitrosyliron complexes (DNICs) functions to control the formation of the {Fe(NO)(2)}(10){Fe(NO)(2)}(10) dianionic reduced Roussin's red ester (RRE) [PPN](2)[Fe(μ-SR)(NO)(2)](2) or the {Fe(NO)(2)}(10) dianionic reduced monomeric DNIC [K(+)-18-crown-6 ether](2)[(NO)(2)Fe(SR)(2)] upon reduction of the {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) DNICs [cation][(NO)(2)Fe(SR)(2)] (cation = PPN(+), K(+)-18-crown-6 ether; R = alkyl). The binding preference of ligands [OPh](-)/[SR](-) toward the {Fe(NO)(2)}(10){Fe(NO)(2)}(10) motif of dianionic reduced RRE follows the ligand-displacement series [SR](-) > [OPh](-). Compared to the Fe K-edge preedge energy falling within the range of 7113.6-7113.8 eV for the dinuclear {Fe(NO)(2)}(9){Fe(NO)(2)}(9) DNICs and 7113.4-7113.8 eV for the mononuclear {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) DNICs, the {Fe(NO)(2)}(10) dianionic reduced monomeric DNICs and the {Fe(NO)(2)}(10){Fe(NO)(2)}(10) dianionic reduced RREs containing S/O/N-ligation modes display the characteristic preedge energy 7113.1-7113.3 eV, which may be adopted to probe the formation of the EPR-silent {Fe(NO)(2)}(10)-{Fe(NO)(2)}(10) dianionic reduced RREs and {Fe(NO)(2)}(10) dianionic reduced monomeric DNICs in biology. In addition to the characteristic Fe/S K-edge preedge energy, the IR ν(NO) spectra may also be adopted to characterize and discriminate [(NO)(2)Fe(μ-S(t)Bu)](2) [IR ν(NO) 1809 vw, 1778 s, 1753 s cm(-1) (KBr)], [Fe(μ-S(t)Bu)(NO)(2)](2)(-) [IR ν(NO) 1674 s, 1651 s cm(-1) (KBr)], [Fe(μ-S(t)Bu)(NO)(2)](2)(2-) [IR ν(NO) 1637 m, 1613 s, 1578 s, 1567 s cm(-1) (KBr)], and [K-18-crown-6 ether](2)[(NO)(2)Fe(SEt)(2)] [IR ν(NO) 1604 s, 1560 s cm(-1) (KBr)].     

The first structurally characterized nitrosyl heme thiolate model complex

The NO ligand in the formally {FeNO}6 compound [Fe(oep)(NO)(thiolate)] is bent, and does not impart a significant structural trans effect to the Fe-S bond.     

Synthesis and reactivity of Ir(I) and Ir(III) complexes with MeNH2, Me2C=NR (R = H, Me), C,N-C6H4{C(Me)=N(Me)}-2, and N,N'-RN=C(Me)CH2C(Me2)NHR (R = H, Me) ligands

Complexes [Ir(Cp*)Cl(n)(NH2Me)(3-n)]X(m) (n = 2, m = 0 (1), n = 1, m = 1, X = Cl (2a), n = 0, m = 2, X = OTf (3)) are obtained by reacting [Ir(Cp*)Cl(mu-Cl)]2 with MeNH2 (1:2 or 1:8) or with [Ag(NH2Me)2]OTf (1:4), respectively. Complex 2b (n = 1, m = 1, X = ClO 4) is obtained from 2a and NaClO4 x H2O. The reaction of 3 with MeC(O)Ph at 80 degrees C gives [Ir(Cp*){C,N-C6H4{C(Me)=N(Me)}-2}(NH2Me)]OTf (4), which in turn reacts with RNC to give [Ir(Cp*){C,N-C6H4{C(Me)=N(Me)}-2}(CNR)]OTf (R = (t)Bu (5), Xy (6)). [Ir(mu-Cl)(COD)]2 reacts with [Ag{N(R)=CMe2}2]X (1:2) to give [Ir{N(R)=CMe2}2(COD)]X (R = H, X = ClO4 (7); R = Me, X = OTf (8)). Complexes [Ir(CO)2(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 (9) and [IrCl{N(R)=CMe2}(COD)] (R = H (10), Me (11)) are obtained from the appropriate [Ir{N(R)=CMe2}2(COD)]X and CO or Me4NCl, respectively. [Ir(Cp*)Cl(mu-Cl)]2 reacts with [Au(NH=CMe2)(PPh3)]ClO4 (1:2) to give [Ir(Cp*)(mu-Cl)(NH=CMe2)]2(ClO4)2 (12) which in turn reacts with PPh 3 or Me4NCl (1:2) to give [Ir(Cp*)Cl(NH=CMe2)(PPh3)]ClO4 (13) or [Ir(Cp*)Cl2(NH=CMe2)] (14), respectively. Complex 14 hydrolyzes in a CH2Cl2/Et2O solution to give [Ir(Cp*)Cl2(NH3)] (15). The reaction of [Ir(Cp*)Cl(mu-Cl)]2 with [Ag(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 (1:4) gives [Ir(Cp*)(NH=CMe2)3](ClO4)2 (16a), which reacts with PPNCl (PPN = Ph3=P=N=PPh3) under different reaction conditions to give [Ir(Cp*)(NH=CMe2)3]XY (X = Cl, Y = ClO4 (16b); X = Y = Cl (16c)). Equimolar amounts of 14 and 16a react to give [Ir(Cp*)Cl(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 (17), which in turn reacts with PPNCl to give [Ir(Cp*)Cl(H-imam)]Cl (R-imam = N,N'-N(R)=C(Me)CH2C(Me)2NHR (18a)]. Complexes [Ir(Cp*)Cl(R-imam)]ClO4 (R = H (18b), Me (19)) are obtained from 18a and AgClO4 or by refluxing 2b in acetone for 7 h, respectively. They react with AgClO4 and the appropriate neutral ligand or with [Ag(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 to give [Ir(Cp*)(R-imam)L](ClO4)2 (R = H, L = (t)BuNC (20), XyNC (21); R = Me, L = MeCN (22)) or [Ir(Cp*)(H-imam)(NH=CMe2)](ClO4)2 (23a), respectively. The later reacts with PPNCl to give [Ir(Cp*)(H-imam)(NH=CMe2)]Cl(ClO4) (23b). The reaction of 22 with XyNC gives [Ir(Cp*)(Me-imam)(CNXy)](ClO4)2 (24). The structures of complexes 15, 16c and 18b have been solved by X-ray diffraction methods.     

Light-induced NO release from iron-nitrosyl-thiolato complex: The role of noncovalent thiol/thioether

Four low-spin {FeNO}⁶ complexes, [Fe(NO)(PS2)(PS2H)] ( 1 , PS2H₂ = bis(2-dimercaptophenyl)phenylphosphine) with a pendant thiol, [Fe(NO)(PS2)(PS2CH₃)] ( 2 ) bearing a pendant thioether, and [Fe(NO)(PS2)(^RPS)] (RH, 4a ; RTMS, 4b ) without the noncovalent thiol/thioether group are spectroscopically and structurally characterized. In comparisons of the ν_NO, absorption energy in UV/vis spectra and structural parameters from single X-ray diffraction studies, the four iron-nitrosyl-thiolato compounds share similarity in electronic structure. Complex 1 with a pendant thiol leads to NO and HNO production upon exposure to the light. Photolysis of 2 bearing a pendant thioether only affords NO. Effective detection of HNO or NO from 1 or 2 is achieved by the employment of [Mn^III(^TMSPS3)(DABCO)]. In contrast, 4a and 4b show inertness toward visible-light stimulus. Photolysis and having pendant thiol/thioether group play key roles in NO production from these iron-nitrosyl-thiolato complexes, that is, the Fe-NO bond is weakened by exposure to light and the noncovalent SH of 1 or SCH₃ of 2 can serve as an incoming ligand to interact with Fe atom, resulting in a transient with intramolecular [RS⋅⋅⋅Fe⋅⋅⋅NO] interaction (RH and CH₃) which could facilitate NO dissociation.     

Multiple pathways for dinitrogen activation during the reduction of an Fe Bis(iminepyridine) complex

Reduction of the bis(iminopyridine) FeCl(2) complex {2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}FeCl(2) using NaH has led to the formation of a surprising variety of structures depending on the amount of reductant. Some of the species reported in this work were isolated from the same reaction mixture, and their structures suggest the presence of multiple pathways for dinitrogen activation. The reaction with 3 equiv of NaH afforded {2-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))]-6-[2,6-(iPr)(20PhN-C=CH(2)](C(5)H(3)N)}Fe(micro,eta(2)-N(2))Na (THF) (1) containing one N(2) unit terminally bound to Fe and side-on attached to the Na atom. In the process, one of the two imine methyl groups has been deprotonated, transforming the neutral ligand into the corresponding monoanionic version. When 4 equiv were employed, two other dinitrogen complexes {2-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))]-6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN-C=CH(2)](C(5)H(3)N)}Fe(micro-N2)Na(Et(2)O)(3) (2) and {2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}Fe(micro-N(2))Na[Na(THF)(2)] (3) were obtained from the same reaction mixture. Complex 2 is chemically equivalent to 1, the different degree of solvation of the alkali cation being the factor apparently responsible for the sigma-bonding mode of ligation of the N(2) unit to Na, versus the pi-bonding mode featured in 1. In complex 3, the ligand remains neutral but a larger extent of reduction has been obtained, as indicated by the presence of two Na atoms in the structure. A further increase in the amount of reductant (12 equiv) afforded a mixture of {2-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))]-6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN-C=CH(2)](C(5)H(3)N)}Fe-N(2) (4) and [{2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}Fe-N(2)](2)(micro-Na) [Na(THF)(2)](2) (5) which were isolated by fractional crystallization. Complex 4, also containing a terminally bonded N(2) unit and a deprotonated anionic ligand bearing no Na cations, appears to be the precursor of 1. The apparent contradiction that excess NaH is required for its successful isolation (4 is the least reduced complex of this series) is most likely explained by the formation of the partner product 5, which may tentatively be regarded as the result of aggregation between 1 and 3 (with the ligand system in its neutral form). Finally, reduction carried out in the presence of additional free ligand afforded {2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}Fe(eta(1)-N(2)){2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](20(NC(5)H(2))}[Na(THF)(2)] (6) and {2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(C(5)H(3)N)}Fe{2,6-[2,6-(iPr)(2)PhN=C(CH(3))](2)(NC(5)H(2))}Na(THF)(2)) (7). In both species, the Fe metal is bonded to the pyridine ring para position of an additional (L)Na unit. Complex 6 chemically differs from 7 (the major component) only for the presence of an end-on coordinated N(2).     

Discrimination of mononuclear and dinuclear dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNICs) by S K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy: insight into the electronic structure and reactivity of DNICs

In addition to probing the formation of dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNICs) by the characteristic Fe K-edge pre-edge absorption energy ranging from 7113.4 to 7113.8 eV, the distinct S K-edge pre-edge absorption energy and pattern can serve as an efficient tool to unambiguously characterize and discriminate mononuclear DNICs and dinuclear DNICs containing bridged-thiolate and bridged-sulfide ligands. The higher Fe-S bond covalency modulated by the stronger electron-donating thiolates promotes the Fe → NO π-electron back-donation to strengthen the Fe-NO bond and weaken the NO-release ability of the mononuclear DNICs, which is supported by the Raman ν(Fe-NO) stretching frequency. The Fe-S bond covalency of DNICs further rationalizes the binding preference of the {Fe(NO)(2)} motif toward thiolates following the trend of [SEt](-) > [SPh](-) > [SC(7)H(4)SN](-). The relative d-manifold energy derived from S K-edge XAS as well as the Fe K-edge pre-edge energy reveals that the electronic structure of the {Fe(NO)(2)}(9) core of the mononuclear DNICs [(NO)(2)Fe(SR)(2)](-) is best described as {Fe(III)(NO(-))(2)}(9) compared to [{Fe(III)(NO(-))(2)}(9)-{Fe(III)(NO(-))(2)}(9)] for the dinuclear DNICs [Fe(2)(μ-SEt)(μ-S)(NO)(4)](-) and [Fe(2)(μ-S)(2)(NO)(4)](2-).     

Synthesis, spectroscopic analysis and photolabilization of water-soluble ruthenium(III)-nitrosyl complexes

In this paper, the synthesis, structural and spectroscopic characterization of a series of new Ru(III)-nitrosyls of {RuNO}(6) type with the coligand TPA (tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine) are presented. The complex [Ru(TPA)Cl(2)(NO)]ClO(4) (2) was prepared from the Ru(III) precursor [Ru(TPA)Cl(2)]ClO(4) (1) by simple reaction with NO gas. This led to the surprising displacement of one of the pyridine (py) arms of TPA by NO (instead of the substitution of a chloride anion by NO), as confirmed by X-ray crystallography. NO complexes where TPA serves as a tetradentate ligand were obtained by reacting the new Ru(II) precursor [Ru(TPA)(NO(2))(2)] (3) with a strong acid. This leads to the dehydration of nitrite to NO(+), and the formation of the {RuNO}(6) complex [Ru(TPA)(ONO)(NO)](PF(6))(2) (4), which was also structurally characterized. Derivatives of 4 where nitrite is replaced by urea (5) or water (6) were also obtained. The nitrosyl complexes obtained this way were then further investigated using IR and FT-Raman spectroscopy. Complex 2 with the two anionic chloride coligands shows the lowest N-O and highest Ru-NO stretching frequencies of 1903 and 619 cm(-1) of all the complexes investigated here. Complexes 5 and 6 where TPA serves as a tetradentate ligand show ν(N-O) at higher energy, 1930 and 1917 cm(-1), respectively, and ν(Ru-NO) at lower energy, 577 and 579 cm(-1), respectively, compared to 2. These vibrational energies, as well as the inverse correlation of ν(N-O) and ν(Ru-NO) observed along this series of complexes, again support the Ru(II)-NO(+) type electronic structure previously proposed for {RuNO}(6) complexes. Finally, we investigated the photolability of the Ru-NO bond upon irradiation with UV light to determine the quantum yields (φ) for NO photorelease in complexes 2, 4, 5, and additional water-soluble complexes [Ru(H(2)edta)(Cl)(NO)] (7) and [Ru(Hedta)(NO)] (8). Although {RuNO}(6) complexes are frequently proposed as NO delivery agents in vivo, studies that investigate how φ is affected by the solvent water are lacking. Our results indicate that neutral water is not a solvent that promotes the photodissociation of NO, which would present a major obstacle to the goal of designing {RuNO}(6) complexes as photolabile NO delivery agents in vivo.     

Comparison between the geometric and electronic structures and reactivities of [FeNO]7 and [FeO2]8 complexes: a density functional theory study

In a previous study, we analyzed the electronic structure of S = 3/2 [FeNO](7) model complexes [Brown et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 715-732]. The combined spectroscopic data and SCF-X alpha-SW electronic structure calculations are best described in terms of Fe(III) (S = 5/2) antiferromagnetically coupled to NO(-) (S = 1). Many nitrosyl derivatives of non-heme iron enzymes have spectroscopic properties similar to those of these model complexes. These NO derivatives can serve as stable analogues of highly labile oxygen intermediates. It is thus essential to establish a reliable density functional theory (DFT) methodology for the geometry and energetics of [FeNO](7) complexes, based on detailed experimental data. This methodology can then be extended to the study of [FeO(2)](8) complexes, followed by investigations into the reaction mechanisms of non-heme iron enzymes. Here, we have used the model complex Fe(Me(3)TACN)(NO)(N(3))(2) as an experimental marker and determined that a pure density functional BP86 with 10% hybrid character and a mixed triple-zeta/double-zeta basis set lead to agreement between experimental and computational data. This methodology is then applied to optimize the hypothetical Fe(Me(3)TACN)(O(2))(N(3))(2) complex, where the NO moiety is replaced by O(2). The main geometric differences are an elongated Fe[bond]O(2) and a steeper Fe[bond]O[bond]O angle in the [FeO(2)](8) complex. The electronic structure of [FeO(2)](8) corresponds to Fe(III) (S = 5/2) antiferromagnetically coupled to O(2)(-) (S = 1/2), and, consistent with the extended bond length, the [FeO(2)](8) unit has only one Fe(III)-O(2)(-) bonding interaction, while the [FeNO](7) unit has both sigma and pi type Fe(III)-NO(-) bonds. This is in agreement with experiment as NO forms a more stable Fe(III)-NO(-) adduct relative to O(2)(-). Although NO is, in fact, harder to reduce, the resultant NO(-) species forms a more stable bond to Fe(III) relative to O(2)(-) due to the different bonding interactions.