Proof-theoretic conservations of weak weak intuitionistic constructive set theories

The paper aims to provide precise proof theoretic characterizations of Myhill–Friedman-style “weak” constructive extensional set theories and Aczel–Rathjen analogous constructive set theories both enriched by Mostowski-style collapsing axioms and/or related anti-foundation axioms. The main results include full intuitionistic conservations over the corresponding purely arithmetical formalisms that are well known in the reverse mathematics – which strengthens analogous results obtained by the author in the 80s. The present research was inspired by the more recent Sato-style “weak weak” classical extensional set theories whose proof theoretic strengths are shown to strongly exceed the ones of the intuitionistic counterparts in the presence of the collapsing axioms.     

A focused approach to combining logics

We present a compact sequent calculus LKU for classical logic organized around the concept of polarization. Focused sequent calculi for classical, intuitionistic, and multiplicative-additive linear logics are derived as fragments of the host system by varying the sensitivity of specialized structural rules to polarity information. We identify a general set of criteria under which cut-elimination holds in such fragments. From cut-elimination we derive a unified proof of the completeness of focusing. Furthermore, each sublogic can interact with other fragments through cut. We examine certain circumstances, for example, in which a classical lemma can be used in an intuitionistic proof while preserving intuitionistic provability. We also examine the possibility of defining classical-linear hybrid logics.     

Bounded linear-time temporal logic: A proof-theoretic investigation

Propositional and first-order bounded linear-time temporal logics (BLTL and FBLTL, respectively) are introduced by restricting Gentzen type sequent calculi for linear-time temporal logics. The corresponding Robinson type resolution calculi, RC and FRC for BLTL and FBLTL respectively are obtained. To prove the equivalence between FRC and FBLTL, a temporal version of Herbrand theorem is used. The completeness theorems for BLTL and FBLTL are proved for simple semantics with both a bounded time domain and some bounded valuation conditions on temporal operators. The cut-elimination theorems for BLTL and FBLTL are also proved using some theorems for embedding BLTL and FBLTL into propositional (first-order, respectively) classical logic. Although FBLTL is undecidable, its monadic fragment is shown to be decidable.     

On the constructive Dedekind reals

In order to build the collection of Cauchy reals as a set in constructive set theory, the only power set-like principle needed is exponentiation. In contrast, the proof that the Dedekind reals form a set has seemed to require more than that. The main purpose here is to show that exponentiation alone does not suffice for the latter, by furnishing a Kripke model of constructive set theory, Constructive Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with subset collection replaced by exponentiation, in which the Cauchy reals form a set while the Dedekind reals constitute a proper class.     

On the rules of intermediate logics

If the Visser rules are admissible for an intermediate logic, they form a basis for the admissible rules of the logic. How to characterize the admissible rules of intermediate logics for which not all of the Visser rules are admissible is not known. In this paper we give a brief overview of results on admissible rules in the context of intermediate logics. We apply these results to some well-known intermediate logics. We provide natural examples of logics for which the Visser rule are derivable, admissible but nonderivable, or not admissible. Supported by the Austrian Science Fund FWF under projects P16264 and P16539.     

Some remarks on lengths of propositional proofs

We survey the best known lower bounds on symbols and lines in Frege and extended Frege proofs. We prove that in minimum length sequent calculus proofs, no formula is generated twice or used twice on any single branch of the proof. We prove that the number of distinct subformulas in a minimum length Frege proof is linearly bounded by the number of lines. Depthd Frege proofs ofm lines can be transformed into depthd proofs ofO(m ^d+1) symbols. We show that renaming Frege proof systems are p-equivalent to extended Frege systems. Some open problems in propositional proof length and in logical flow graphs are discussed. Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-9205181     

Herbrand's theorem and term induction

We study the formal first order system TIND in the standard language of Gentzen's LK . TIND extends LK by the purely logical rule of term-induction, that is a restricted induction principle, deriving numerals instead of arbitrary terms. This rule may be conceived as the logical image of full induction.     

Generalizing realizability and Heyting models for constructive set theory

This article presents a common generalization of the two main methods for obtaining class models of constructive set theory. Heyting models are a generalization of the Boolean models for classical set theory which are a variant of forcing, while realizability is a decidedly constructive method that has first been developed for number theory by Kleene and was later very fruitfully adapted to constructive set theory. In order to achieve the generalization, a new kind of structure (applicative topologies) is introduced, which contains both elements of formal topology and applicative structures. This approach not only deepens the understanding of class models and leads to more efficiency in proofs about these kinds of models, but also makes it possible to prove new results about the two special cases that were not known before and to construct new models.     

Generalized ordinal sums and the decidability of BL-chains

We present a general construction of a family of ordinal sums of a sequence of structures and prove an elimination theorem for the class of ordinal sums in an expanded language. From this we deduce the decidability of the class of -ordinal sums of models of a decidable theory T. As an application of this result we prove that the theory of BL-chains is decidable.In Celebration of the Sixtieth Birthday of Ralph N. McKenzieReceived June 9, 2002; accepted in final form June 19, 2003.     

A minimal classical sequent calculus free of structural rules

Gentzen’s classical sequent calculus has explicit structural rules for contraction and weakening. They can be absorbed (in a right-sided formulation) by replacing the axiom P,¬P by Γ,P,¬P for any context Γ, and replacing the original disjunction rule with Γ,A,B implies Γ,A∨B.This paper presents a classical sequent calculus which is also free of contraction and weakening, but more symmetrically: both contraction and weakening are absorbed into conjunction, leaving the axiom rule intact. It uses a blended conjunction rule, combining the standard context-sharing and context-splitting rules: Γ,Δ,A and Γ,Σ,B implies Γ,Δ,Σ,A∧B. We refer to this system as minimal sequent calculus.We prove a minimality theorem for the propositional fragment : any propositional sequent calculus S (within a standard class of right-sided calculi) is complete if and only ifS contains (that is, each rule of is derivable in S). Thus one can view as a minimal complete core of Gentzen’s .     

Cutting planes,connectivity, and threshold logic

Originating from work in operations research the cutting plane refutation systemCP is an extension of resolution, where unsatisfiable propositional logic formulas in conjunctive normal form are recognized by showing the non-existence of boolean solutions to associated families of linear inequalities. Polynomial sizeCP proofs are given for the undirecteds-t connectivity principle. The subsystemsCP _q ofCP, forq2, are shown to be polynomially equivalent toCP, thus answering problem 19 from the list of open problems of [8]. We present a normal form theorem forCP ₂-proofs and thereby for arbitraryCP-proofs. As a corollary, we show that the coefficients and constant terms in arbitrary cutting plane proofs may be exponentially bounded by the number of steps in the proof, at the cost of an at most polynomial increase in the number of steps in the proof. The extensionCPLE ⁺, introduced in [9] and there shown top-simulate Frege systems, is proved to be polynomially equivalent to Frege systems. Lastly, since linear inequalities are related to threshold gates, we introduce a new threshold logic and prove a completeness theorem.Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-9205181 and by US-Czech Science and Technology Grant 93-205Partially supported by NSF grant CCR-9102896 and by US-Czech Science and Technology Grant 93-205     

A constructive and functorial embedding of locally compact metric spaces into locales

The paper establishes, within constructive mathematics, a full and faithful functor M from the category of locally compact metric spaces and continuous functions into the category of formal topologies (or equivalently locales). The functor preserves finite products, and moreover satisfies f?g if, and only if, M(f)?M(g) for continuous . This makes it possible to transfer results between Bishop's constructive theory of metric spaces and constructive locale theory.     

The bounded proof property via step algebras and step frames

The paper introduces semantic and algorithmic methods for establishing a variant of the analytic subformula property (called ‘the bounded proof property’, bpp) for modal propositional logics. The bpp is much weaker property than full cut-elimination, but it is nevertheless sufficient for establishing decidability results. Our methodology originated from tools and techniques developed on one side within the algebraic/coalgebraic literature dealing with free algebra constructions and on the other side from classical correspondence theory in modal logic. As such, our approach is orthogonal to recent literature based on proof-theoretic methods and, in a way, complements it.     

The equivalence of bar recursion and open recursion

Several extensions of Gödel's system T$\mathsf{T}$ with new forms of recursion have been designed for the purpose of giving a computational interpretation to classical analysis. One can organise many of these extensions into two groups: those based on bar recursion, which include Spector's original bar recursion, modified bar recursion and the more recent products of selections functions, or those based on open recursion   which in particular include the symmetric Berardi–Bezem–Coquand (BBC) functional. We relate these two groups by showing that both open recursion and the BBC functional are primitive recursively equivalent to a variant of modified bar recursion. Our results, in combination with existing research, essentially complete the classification up to primitive recursive equivalence of those extensions of system T$\mathsf{T}$ used to give a direct computational interpretation to choice principles.     

Aristotle’s Non-Logical Works and the Square of Oppositions in Semiotics

This paper aims to highlight some peculiarities of the semiotic square, whose creation is due in particular to Greimas’ works. The starting point is the semiotic notion of complex term, which I regard as one of the main differences between Greimas’ square and Blanché’s hexagon. The remarks on the complex terms make room for a historical survey in Aristotle’s texts, where one can find the philosophical roots of the idea of middle term between two contraries and its relation to notions such as difference, position and motion. In the Stagirite’s non-logical works, the theory of the intermediate, or middle term, represents an important link between opposition issues and ethics: this becomes a privileged perspective from which to reconsider the semiotic use of the square, i.e., its inclusion in the semio-narrative structures articulating the sense of texts.      

The complexity of the Pigeonhole Principle

The Pigeonhole Principle forn is the statement that there is no one-to-one function between a set of sizen and a set of sizen–1. This statement can be formulated as an unlimited fan-in constant depth polynomial size Boolean formulaPHP _n inn(n–1) variables. We may think that the truth-value of the variablex _i,j will be true iff the function maps thei-th element of the first set to thej-th element of the second (see Cook and Rechkow [5]).PHP _n can be proved in the propositional calculus. That is, a sequence of Boolean formulae can be given so that each one is either an axiom of the propositional calculus or a consequence of some of the previous ones according to an inference rule of the propositional calculus, and the last one isPHP _n . Our main result is that the Pigeonhole Principle cannot be proved this way, if the size of the proof (the total number or symbols of the formulae in the sequence) is polynomial inn and each formula is constant depth (unlimited fan-in), polynomial size and contains only the variables ofPHP _n .     

A note on theΠ 2 0 -induction rule

It is well-known (due to C. Parsons) that the extension of primitive recursive arithmeticPRA by first-order predicate logic and the rule of ₂ ⁰ -induction ₂ ⁰ -IR is ₂ ⁰ -conservative overPRA. We show that this is no longer true in the presence of function quantifiers and quantifier-free choice for numbersAC ^0,0-qf. More precisely we show that :=PRA ² + ₂ ⁰ -IR+AC ^0,0-qf proves the totality of the Ackermann function, wherePRA ² is the extension ofPRA by number and function quantifiers and ₂ ⁰ -IR may contain function parameters.This is true even forPRA ² + ₁ ⁰ -IR+ ₂ ⁰ -IR ^–+AC ^0,0-qf, where ₂ ⁰ -IR ^– is the restriction of ₂ ⁰ -IR without function parameters.I am grateful to an anonymous referee whose suggestions led to an improved discussion of our results     

Admissible rules in the implication-negation fragment of intuitionistic logic

Uniform infinite bases are defined for the single-conclusion and multiple-conclusion admissible rules of the implication-negation fragments of intuitionistic logic and its consistent axiomatic extensions (intermediate logics). A Kripke semantics characterization is given for the (hereditarily) structurally complete implication-negation fragments of intermediate logics, and it is shown that the admissible rules of this fragment of form a PSPACE-complete set and have no finite basis.