Proof internalization in generalized Frege systems for classical logic

We present a general method for inserting proofs in Frege systems for classical logic that produces systems that can internalize their own proofs.     

Kripke semantics for provability logic GLP

A well-known polymodal provability logic due to Japaridze is complete w.r.t. the arithmetical semantics where modalities correspond to reflection principles of restricted logical complexity in arithmetic. This system plays an important role in some recent applications of provability algebras in proof theory. However, an obstacle in the study of is that it is incomplete w.r.t. any class of Kripke frames. In this paper we provide a complete Kripke semantics for . First, we isolate a certain subsystem of that is sound and complete w.r.t. a nice class of finite frames. Second, appropriate models for are defined as the limits of chains of finite expansions of models for . The techniques involves unions of n-elementary chains and inverse limits of Kripke models. All the results are obtained by purely modal-logical methods formalizable in elementary arithmetic.     

Possible world semantics for first-order logic of proofs

In the tech report Artemov and Yavorskaya (Sidon) (2011) [4] an elegant formulation of the first-order logic of proofs was given, FOLP. This logic plays a fundamental role in providing an arithmetic semantics for first-order intuitionistic logic, as was shown. In particular, the tech report proved an arithmetic completeness theorem, and a realization theorem for FOLP. In this paper we provide a possible-world semantics for FOLP, based on the propositional semantics of Fitting (2005) [5]. We also give an Mkrtychev semantics. Motivation and intuition for FOLP can be found in Artemov and Yavorskaya (Sidon) (2011) [4], and are not fully discussed here.     

The complexity of temporal logic over the reals

It is shown that the decision problem for the temporal logic with until and since connectives over real-numbers time is PSPACE-complete. This is the most practically useful dense time temporal logic.     

Unification in linear temporal logic LTL

We prove that a propositional Linear Temporal Logic with Until and Next (LTL) has unitary unification. Moreover, for every unifiable in LTL formula A there is a most general projective unifier, corresponding to some projective formula B, such that A is derivable from B in LTL. On the other hand, it can be shown that not every open and unifiable in LTL formula is projective. We also present an algorithm for constructing a most general unifier.     

Positive provability logic for uniform reflection principles

We deal with the fragment of modal logic consisting of implications of formulas built up from the variables and the constant ‘true’ by conjunction and diamonds only. The weaker language allows one to interpret the diamonds as the uniform reflection schemata in arithmetic, possibly of unrestricted logical complexity. We formulate an arithmetically complete calculus with modalities labeled by natural numbers and ω, where ω   corresponds to the full uniform reflection schema, whereas n<ω$n<\omega$ corresponds to its restriction to arithmetical _Πn+1${\Pi }_{n+1}$-formulas. This calculus is shown to be complete w.r.t. a suitable class of finite Kripke models and to be decidable in polynomial time.     

The omega-rule interpretation of transfinite provability logic

Given a computable ordinal Λ, the transfinite provability logic ${\mathsf{GLP}}_{\mathrm{\Lambda }}$ has for each $\xi <\mathrm{\Lambda }$ a modality $[\xi ]$ intended to represent a provability predicate within a chain of increasing strength. One possibility is to read $[\xi ]?$ as ? is provable in T using ω-rules of depth at most ξ, where T is a second-order theory extending ${\mathrm{ACA}}_0$.In this paper we will formalize such iterations of ω-rules in second-order arithmetic and show how it is a special case of what we call uniform provability predicates. Uniform provability predicates are similar to Ignatiev's strong provability predicates except that they can be iterated transfinitely. Finally, we show that ${\mathsf{GLP}}_{\mathrm{\Lambda }}$ is sound and complete for any uniform provability predicate.     

Normal deduction in the intuitionistic linear logic

We describe a natural deduction system NDIL for the second order intuitionistic linear logic which admits normalization and has a subformula property. NDIL is an extension of the system for !-free multiplicative linear logic constructed by the author and elaborated by A. Babaev. Main new feature here is the treatment of the modality !. It uses a device inspired by D. Prawitz' treatment of S4 combined with a construction introduced by the author to avoid cut-like constructions used in -elimination and global restrictions employed by Prawitz. Normal form for natural deduction is obtained by Prawitz translation of cut-free sequent derivations. Received: March 29, 1996     

Kripke models for classical logic

We introduce a notion of the Kripke model for classical logic for which we constructively prove the soundness and cut-free completeness. We discuss the novelty of the notion and its potential applications.     

Around provability logic

We present some results on algebraic and modal analysis of polynomial (intrinsically definable) distortions of the standard provability predicate in Peano Arithmetic PA, and investigate three provability-like modal systems related to the Gödel-Löb modal system GL. We also present a short review of relational and topological semantics for these systems, and describe the dual category of algebraic models of our main modal system.     

On arithmetical completeness of the logic of proofs

In this paper, we establish a stronger version of Artemov's arithmetical completeness theorem of the Logic of Proofs ${\mathsf{LP}}_0$. Moreover, we prove a version of the uniform arithmetical completeness theorem of ${\mathsf{LP}}_0$.     

Topological completeness of the provability logic GLP

Provability logic GLP is well-known to be incomplete w.r.t. Kripke semantics. A natural topological semantics of GLP interprets modalities as derivative operators of a polytopological space. Such spaces are called GLP-spaces whenever they satisfy all the axioms of GLP. We develop some constructions to build nontrivial GLP-spaces and show that GLP is complete w.r.t. the class of all GLP-spaces.     

Cutting planes,connectivity, and threshold logic

Originating from work in operations research the cutting plane refutation systemCP is an extension of resolution, where unsatisfiable propositional logic formulas in conjunctive normal form are recognized by showing the non-existence of boolean solutions to associated families of linear inequalities. Polynomial sizeCP proofs are given for the undirecteds-t connectivity principle. The subsystemsCP _q ofCP, forq2, are shown to be polynomially equivalent toCP, thus answering problem 19 from the list of open problems of [8]. We present a normal form theorem forCP ₂-proofs and thereby for arbitraryCP-proofs. As a corollary, we show that the coefficients and constant terms in arbitrary cutting plane proofs may be exponentially bounded by the number of steps in the proof, at the cost of an at most polynomial increase in the number of steps in the proof. The extensionCPLE ⁺, introduced in [9] and there shown top-simulate Frege systems, is proved to be polynomially equivalent to Frege systems. Lastly, since linear inequalities are related to threshold gates, we introduce a new threshold logic and prove a completeness theorem.Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-9205181 and by US-Czech Science and Technology Grant 93-205Partially supported by NSF grant CCR-9102896 and by US-Czech Science and Technology Grant 93-205     

A constructive investigation of satisfiability

We present a constructive analysis of the logical notions of satisfiability and consistency for first-order intuitionistic formulae. In particular, we use formal topology theory to provide a positive semantics for satisfiability. Then we propose a “co-inductive” logical calculus, which captures the positive content of consistency.     

Provability logic and the completeness principle

The logic $\mathsf{iGLC}$ is the intuitionistic version of Löb's Logic plus the completeness principle $A\to \square A$. In this paper, we prove an arithmetical completeness theorems for $\mathsf{iGLC}$ for theories equipped with two provability predicates □ and △ that prove the schemes $A\to △A$ and $\square △S\to \square S$ for $S\in {\mathrm{\Sigma }}_1$. We provide two salient instances of the theorem. In the first, □ is fast provability and △ is ordinary provability and, in the second, □ is ordinary provability and △ is slow provability.Using the second instance, we reprove a theorem previously obtained by Mohammad Ardeshir and Mojtaba Mojtahedi [1] determining the ${\mathrm{\Sigma }}_1$-provability logic of Heyting Arithmetic.     

The bounded proof property via step algebras and step frames

The paper introduces semantic and algorithmic methods for establishing a variant of the analytic subformula property (called ‘the bounded proof property’, bpp) for modal propositional logics. The bpp is much weaker property than full cut-elimination, but it is nevertheless sufficient for establishing decidability results. Our methodology originated from tools and techniques developed on one side within the algebraic/coalgebraic literature dealing with free algebra constructions and on the other side from classical correspondence theory in modal logic. As such, our approach is orthogonal to recent literature based on proof-theoretic methods and, in a way, complements it.     

Prefixed tableaus and nested sequents

Nested sequent systems for modal logics are a relatively recent development, within the general area known as deep reasoning. The idea of deep reasoning is to create systems within which one operates at lower levels in formulas than just those involving the main connective or operator. Prefixed tableaus go back to 1972, and are modal tableau systems with extra machinery to represent accessibility in a purely syntactic way. We show that modal nested sequents and prefixed modal tableaus are notational variants of each other, roughly in the same way that Gentzen sequent calculi and tableaus are notational variants. This immediately gives rise to new modal nested sequent systems which may be of independent interest. We discuss some of these, including those for some justification logics that include standard modal operators.     

No Escape from Vardanyan's theorem

Vardanyan's theorem states that the set of PA-valid principles of Quantified Modal Logic, QML, is complete Π⁰₂. We generalize this result to a wide class of theories. The crucial step in the generalization is avoiding the use of Tennenbaum's Theorem.