Solubility Measurements of Crystalline NiO in Aqueous Solution as a Function of Temperature and pH

Results of solubility experiments involving crystalline nickel oxide (bunsenite) in aqueous solutions are reported as functions of temperature (0 to 350 °C) and pH at pressures slightly exceeding (with one exception) saturation vapor pressure. These experiments were carried out in either flow-through reactors or a hydrogen-electrode concentration cell for mildly acidic to near neutral pH solutions. The results were treated successfully with a thermodynamic model incorporating only the unhydrolyzed aqueous nickel species (viz., Ni²⁺) and the neutrally charged hydrolyzed species (viz., Ni(OH)₂⁰)\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_{2}^{0}). The thermodynamic quantities obtained at 25 °C and infinite dilution are, with 2σ uncertainties: log₁₀K_s0^o = (12.40 ±0.29),\varDelta_rG_m^o = -(70. 8 ±1.7)\log_{10}K_{\mathrm{s0}}^{\mathrm{o}} = (12.40 \pm 0.29),\varDelta_{\mathrm{r}}G_{m}^{\mathrm{o}} = -(70. 8 \pm 1.7) kJ⋅mol⁻¹; \varDelta_rH_m^o = -(105.6 ±1.3)\varDelta_{\mathrm{r}}H_{m}^{\mathrm{o}} = -(105.6 \pm 1.3) kJ⋅mol⁻¹; \varDelta_rS_m^o = -(116.6 ±3.2)\varDelta_{\mathrm{r}}S_{m}^{\mathrm{o}} =-(116.6 \pm 3.2) J⋅K⁻¹⋅mol⁻¹; \varDelta_rC_p,m^o = (0 ±13)\varDelta_{\mathrm{r}}C_{p,m}^{\mathrm{o}} = (0 \pm 13) J⋅K⁻¹⋅mol⁻¹; and log₁₀K_s2^o = -(8.76 ±0.15)\log_{10}K_{\mathrm{s2}}^{\mathrm{o}} = -(8.76 \pm 0.15); \varDelta_rG_m^o = (50.0 ±1.7)\varDelta_{\mathrm{r}}G_{m}^{\mathrm{o}} = (50.0 \pm 1.7) kJ⋅mol⁻¹; \varDelta_rH_m^o = (17.7 ±1.7)\varDelta_{\mathrm{r}}H_{m}^{\mathrm{o}} = (17.7 \pm 1.7) kJ⋅mol⁻¹; \varDelta_rS_m^o = -(108±7)\varDelta_{\mathrm{r}}S_{m}^{\mathrm{o}} = -(108\pm 7) J⋅K⁻¹⋅mol⁻¹; \varDelta_rC_p,m^o = -(108 ±3)\varDelta_{\mathrm{r}}C_{p,m}^{\mathrm{o}} = -(108 \pm 3) J⋅K⁻¹⋅mol⁻¹. These results are internally consistent, but the latter set differs from those gleaned from previous studies recorded in the literature. The corresponding thermodynamic quantities for the formation of Ni²⁺ and Ni(OH)₂⁰\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_{2}^{0} are also estimated. Moreover, the Ni(OH)₃ ^-\mathrm{Ni(OH)}_{3}^{ -} anion was never observed, even in relatively strong basic solutions (m_{OH ^-} = 0.1m_{\mathrm{OH}^{ -}} = 0.1 mol⋅kg⁻¹), contrary to the conclusions drawn from all but one previous study.     

Thermodynamic studies on Pr2TeO6

The standard Gibbs energy of formation of Pr₂TeO₆ $ (\Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{^\circ } \left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} ,\;{\text{s}}} \right)) $ was derived from its vapour pressure in the temperature range of 1,400–1,480 K. The vapour pressure of TeO₂ (g) was measured by employing a thermogravimetry-based transpiration method. The temperature dependence of the vapour pressure of TeO₂ over the mixture Pr₂TeO₆ (s) + Pr₂O₃ (s) generated by the incongruent vapourization reaction, Pr₂TeO₆ (s) = Pr₂O₃ (s) + TeO₂ (g) + ½ O₂ (g) could be represented as: $ { \log }\left\{ {{{p\left( {{\text{TeO}}_{ 2} ,\;{\text{g}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{p\left( {{\text{TeO}}_{ 2} ,\;{\text{g}}} \right)} {{\text{Pa}} \pm 0.0 4}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{\text{Pa}} \pm 0.0 4}}} \right\} = 19. 12- 27132\; \left({\rm{{{\text{K}}}}/T} \right) $ . The $ \Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{^\circ } \;\left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} } \right) $ could be represented by the relation $ \left\{ {{{\Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{^\circ } \left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} ,\;{\text{s}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{^\circ } \left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} ,\;{\text{s}}} \right)} {\left( {{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0em} {\left( {{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} } \right)}} \pm 5.0} \right\} = - 2 4 1 5. 1+ 0. 5 7 9 3\;\left(T/{\text{K}}\right) .$ Enthalpy increments of Pr₂TeO₆ were measured by drop calorimetry in the temperature range of 573–1,273 K and heat capacity, entropy and Gibbs energy functions were derived. The $ \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{{298\;{\text{K}}}}^{^\circ } \;\left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} } \right) $ was found to be $ {{ - 2, 40 7. 8 \pm 2.0} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 2, 40 7. 8 \pm 2.0} {\left( {{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0em} {\left( {{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} } \right)}} $ .     

Thermochemistry of 2-Aminopyridine (C<Subscript>5</Subscript>H<Subscript>6</Subscript>N<Subscript>2</Subscript>)(s)

The molar enthalpies of solution of 2-aminopyridine at various molalities were measured at T=298.15 K in double-distilled water by means of an isoperibol solution-reaction calorimeter. According to Pitzer’s theory, the molar enthalpy of solution of the title compound at infinite dilution was calculated to be D_solH_m^￥ = 14.34 kJ·mol^-1\Delta_{\mathrm{sol}}H_{\mathrm{m}}^{\infty} = 14.34~\mbox{kJ}\cdot\mbox{mol}^{-1}, and Pitzer’s ion interaction parameters b_MX^(0)L, b_MX^(1)L\beta_{\mathrm{MX}}^{(0)L}, \beta_{\mathrm{MX}}^{(1)L}, and C_MX^fLC_{\mathrm{MX}}^{\phi L} were obtained. Values of the relative apparent molar enthalpies ( ^φ L) and relative partial molar enthalpies of the compound ([`(L)]₂)\bar{L}_{2}) were derived from the experimental enthalpies of solution of the compound. The standard molar enthalpy of formation of the cation C₅H₇N₂ ⁺\mathrm{C}_{5}\mathrm{H}_{7}\mathrm{N}_{2}^{ +} in aqueous solution was calculated to be D_fH_m^o(C₅H₇N₂⁺,aq)=-(2.096±0.801) kJ·mol^-1\Delta_{\mathrm{f}}H_{\mathrm{m}}^{\mathrm{o}}(\mathrm{C}_{5}\mathrm{H}_{7}\mathrm{N}_{2}^{+},\mbox{aq})=-(2.096\pm 0.801)~\mbox{kJ}\cdot\mbox{mol}^{-1}.     

Characteristics of methyl cellulose-NH4NO3-PEG electrolyte and application in fuel cells

We report the viability of methyl cellulose (MC) as a membrane in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). Methyl cellulose serves as the polymer host, ammonium nitrate (NH₄NO₃) as the doping salt and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as plasticizer. Conductivity measurement was carried out using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The room temperature conductivity of pure MC film is ( 3.08±0.63 ) ×10 ^{- 11}S cm ^{- 1} \left( {{3}.0{8}\pm 0.{63}} \right) \times {1}{0^{ - {11}}}{\hbox{S}}\,{\hbox{c}}{{\hbox{m}}^{ - {1}}} . The conductivity increased to ( 2.10±0.37 ) ×10 ^{- 6}S cm ^{- 1} \left( {{2}.{1}0\pm 0.{37}} \right) \times {1}{0^{ - {6}}}{\hbox{S}}\,{\hbox{c}}{{\hbox{m}}^{ - {1}}} on addition of 25 wt.% NH₄NO₃. By adding 15 wt.% of PEG 200 to the highest conducting sample in the MC-NH₄NO₃ system, the conductivity was further raised by two orders of magnitude to ( 1.14±0.37 ) ×10 ^{- 4}S cm ^{- 1} \left( {{1}.{14}\pm 0.{37}} \right) \times {1}{0^{ - {4}}}{\hbox{S}}\,{\hbox{c}}{{\hbox{m}}^{ - {1}}} . The highest conducting sample containing 15 wt.% PEG was used as membrane in PEMFC and was operated at room and elevated temperatures. From voltage-current density characteristics, the short circuit current density was 31.52 mA cm⁻² at room temperature (25 °C).     

Ion-Solvation Behavior of Pyridinium Dichromate in Water–N,N-Dimethyl Formamide Solvent Mixtures

The electrical conductances of pyridinium dichromate have been measured in N,N-dimethyl formamide–water mixtures of different compositions in the temperature range 283–313 K. The limiting molar conductance, Λ₀, association constant of the ion pair, K _A, and dissociation constant K _C have been calculated using the Shedlovsky and Kraus–Bray equations. The effective ionic radii (r _i ) of C₅H₅NH⁺ and Cr₂O₇ ^-\mathrm{Cr}_{2}\mathrm{O}_{7}^{ -} have been determined from the L_i⁰\Lambda_{i}^{0} values using Gill’s modification of Stokes’ law. The influence of the mixed solvent composition on the solvation of ions is discussed with the help of the ‘R’-factor ( R = \frachL _±⁰(solvent)hL _±⁰(water)R = \frac{\eta \Lambda_{ \pm}^{0}(\mathrm{solvent})}{\eta\Lambda_{ \pm}^{0}(\mathrm{water})}). Thermodynamic parameters are evaluated and reported. The results of this study are interpreted in terms of ion–solvent interactions and solvent properties.     

The Estimation of Standard Molar Enthalpies of Solution for VOSO<Subscript>4</Subscript>⋅<Emphasis Type="Italic">n</Emphasis>H<Subscript>2</Subscript>O(s) in Water and in Aqueous H<Subscript>2</Subscript>SO<Subscript>4</Subscript>

The molar enthalpies of solution of VOSO₄⋅3.52H₂O(s) at various molalities in water and in aqueous sulfuric acid (0.1 mol⋅kg⁻¹), Δ_sol H _m, were measured by a solution-reaction isoperibol calorimeter at 298.15±0.01 K. An improved Archer’s method to estimate the standard molar enthalpy of solution, D_solH⁰_m\Delta_{\mathrm{sol}}H^{0}_{\mathrm{m}}, was put forward. In terms of the improved method, the values of D_solH⁰_m=-24.12±0.03 kJ·mol^-1\Delta_{\mathrm{sol}}H^{0}_{\mathrm{m}}=-24.12\pm 0.03~\mbox{kJ}{\cdot}\mbox{mol}^{-1} of VOSO₄⋅3.52H₂O(s) in water and D_solH⁰_m=-15.38±0.06 kJ·mol^-1\Delta_{\mathrm{sol}}H^{0}_{\mathrm{m}}=-15.38\pm 0.06~\mbox{kJ}{\cdot}\mbox{mol}^{-1} in aqueous sulfuric acid were obtained, respectively. The data indicates that the energy state of VOSO₄ in aqueous H₂SO₄ is higher than that in pure water.     

Phase transitions and thermodynamic properties of anhydrous caffeine

Caffeine has been found to display a low-temperatureβ- and a high-temperatureα-modification. By quantitative DTA the following data were determined: transformation temperature 141±2°; enthalpy of transition 4.03±0.1 kJ·mole^?1; enthalpy of fusion 21.6±0.5 kJ·mole^?1; molar heat capacity $$\begin{array}{*{20}c} {{\vartheta \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\vartheta {^\circ C}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {^\circ C}}} & {100(\beta )} & {100(\alpha )} & {150(\alpha )} & {100(\alpha )} \\ {{{C^\circ _\mathfrak{p} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{C^\circ _\mathfrak{p} } {J \cdot K^{ - 1} \cdot mole^{ - 1} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {J \cdot K^{ - 1} \cdot mole^{ - 1} }}} & {271 \pm 9} & {287 \pm 10} & {309 \pm 11} & {338 \pm 10} \\ \end{array} $$ in good accord with drop-calorimetric data. For the constants of the equation log (p/Pa)=?A/T+B, static vapour pressure measurements on liquid and solidα-caffeine, and effusion measurements on solidβ-caffeine yielded: $$\begin{array}{*{20}c} {A = 3918 \pm 37; 5223 \pm 28; 5781 \pm 35K^{ - 1} } \\ {B = 11.143 \pm 0.072; 13.697 \pm 0.057; 15.031 \pm 0.113} \\ \end{array} $$ . The evaporation coefficient ofβ-caffeine is 0.17±0.03.     

Kinetics and Equilibria for Complex Formation between Palladium(II) and Chloroacetate

Kinetics and equilibria for the formation of a 1:1 complex between palladium(II) and chloroacetate were studied by spectrophotometric measurements in 1.00 mol HClO₄ at 298.2 K. The equilibrium constant, K, of the reaction

Evidence of Different Stoichiometries for the Limiting Carbonate Complexes across the Lanthanide(III) Series

The stoichiometries of limiting carbonate complexes of lanthanide(III) ions were investigated by solubility measurements of hydrated NaLn(CO3)2 solid compounds (Ln = La, Nd, Eu and Dy) at room temperature in aqueous solutions of high ionic strength (3.5 mol⋅kg−1 NaClO4) and high CO32-\mathrm{CO_{3}^{2-}} concentrations (0.1 to 1.5 mol⋅kg−1). The results were interpreted by considering the stability of carbonate complexes, with limiting species found to be La(CO3)45-\mathrm{La(CO_{3})_{4}^{5-}}, Nd(CO3)45-\mathrm{Nd(CO_{3})_{4}^{5-}}, Eu(CO3)33-\mathrm{Eu(CO_{3})_{3}^{3-}} and Dy(CO3)33-\mathrm{Dy(CO_{3})_{3}^{3-}}. TRLFS measurements on the Eu and Dy solutions confirmed the predominance of a single aqueous complex in all the samples. Equilibrium constants were determined for the reaction Ln(CO3)33-+CO32-\mathrm{Ln(CO_{3})_{3}^{3-}}+\mathrm{CO_{3}^{2-}} ⇌ Ln(CO3)45-\mathrm{Ln(CO_{3})_{4}^{5-}}: log10K3.5m NaClO44,La=0.7±0.3\log_{10}K\mathrm{^{3.5m\:NaClO_{4}}_{4,La}=0.7\pm0.3}, log10K3.5m NaClO44,Nd=1.3±0.3\log_{10}K\mathrm{^{3.5m\:NaClO_{4}}_{4,Nd}=1.3\pm0.3}, and for Ln = Eu and Dy, log10K3.5m NaClO44,Ln ￡ -0.4\log_{10}K\mathrm{^{3.5m\:NaClO_{4}}_{4,Ln}\leq-0.4}. These results suggest that tetracarbonato complexes are stable only for the light lanthanide ions in up to 1.5 molal CO32-\mathrm{CO_{3}^{2-}} aqueous solutions, in agreement with our recent capillary electrophoresis study. Comparison with literature results indicates that analogies between actinide(III) and lanthanide(III) ions of similar ionic radii do not hold in concentrated carbonate solutions. Am(CO3)33-\mathrm{Am(CO_{3})_{3}^{3-}} was previously evidenced by solubility measurements, whereas we have observed that Nd(CO3)45-\mathrm{Nd(CO_{3})_{4}^{5-}} predominates in similar conditions. We may speculate that small chemical differences between Ln(III) and An(III) could result in macroscopic differences when their coordination sphere is complete.     

Effect of some nitrogen-heterocyclic compounds on corrosion of tin, indium, and their alloys in HClO4

Abstract  

The effect of adenine, adenosine, and 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine (TPTZ) on the electrochemical and corrosion behavior of tin, indium, and tin-indium alloys in 0.5 M HClO₄ solution at different temperatures was studied. The inhibition efficiency increases with an increase in the concentration of adenine and adenosine in the case of tin and indium. However, the effect of two mentioned compounds on the corrosion rate of the studied alloys gives an opposite effect. In the presence of TPTZ, the inhibition efficiency increases as the concentration of the inhibitor is increased in the case of tin. In the case of both indium and its investigated alloys, the maximum inhibition efficiency is obtained at the lowest concentration of TPTZ (10⁻⁶ M). The adsorption of the studied compounds is found to obey the Frumkin adsorption isotherm. The standard enthalpy \Updelta H_ads^° , \Updelta H_{\rm ads}^{^\circ } , entropy \Updelta S_ads^° , \Updelta S_{\rm ads}^{^\circ } , and free energy changes of adsorption \Updelta G_ads^° \Updelta G_{\rm ads}^{^\circ } are calculated and discussed.     

Crystal structure and thermodynamic properties of dipotassium diiron(III) hexatitanium oxide

In the present work, the temperature dependence of heat capacity of dipotassium diiron(III) hexatitanium oxide has been measured for the first time in the range from 10 to 300 K by means of precision adiabatic vacuum calorimetry. The experimental data were used to calculate standard thermodynamic functions, namely the heat capacity $ C_{p}^{ \circ } (T) $ , enthalpy $ H^{ \circ } (T) - H^{ \circ } (0) $ , entropy $ S^{ \circ } (T) - S^{ \circ } (0), $ and Gibbs function $ G^{ \circ } (T) - H^{ \circ } (0) $ for the range from T → 0 to 300 K. The structure of K₂Fe₂Ti₆O₁₆ is refined by the Rietveld method: space group I4/m, Z = 1, a = 10.1344(2) Å, c = 2.97567(4) Å, V = 305.618(7) Å³. The high-temperature X-ray diffraction was used for the determination of coefficients of thermal expansion.     

Etude par Spectrophotometrie d'absorption de l'Equilibre Pu4++Cl−⇋Pu3++1/2 Cl2 dans le melange LiCl−KCl (70–30% mol) fondu

The quantitative study of the equilibrium Pu⁴⁺+Cl⁻⇋Pu³⁺+1/2 Cl₂ in LiCl−KCl (70–30% mol) at 455, 500, 550 and 600°C by visible and near I.R. absorption spectrophotometry allows the calculation of the reaction's equilibrium constant, the mean thermodynamic data ΔH=27±14 kJ·mol⁻¹ and ΔS=37±17 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ and the standard potential of the couple .      

Thermochemical Properties of Dissolution of Nicotinic Acid C<Subscript>6</Subscript>H<Subscript>5</Subscript>NO<Subscript>2</Subscript>(s) in Aqueous Solution

Nicotinic acid (also known as niacin) was recrystallized from anhydrous ethanol. X-ray crystallography was applied to characterize its crystal structure. The crystal belongs to the monoclinic system, space group P2₍₁₎/c. The crystal cell parameters are a = 0.71401(4) nm, b = 1.16195(7) nm, c = 0.71974(6) nm, α = 90°, β = 113.514(3)°, γ = 90° and Z = 4. Molar enthalpies of dissolution of the compound, at different molalities m/(mol·kg^?1) were measured with an isoperibol solution–reaction calorimeter at T = 298.15 K. The molar enthalpy of solution at infinite dilution was calculated, according to Pitzer’s electrolyte solution model and found to be \( \Delta_{\text{sol}} H_{m}^{\infty } = ( 2 7. 3 \pm 0. 2) \) kJ·mol^?1 and Pitzer’s parameters (\( \beta_{{\text{MX}}}^{{\text{(0)}L}} \), \( \beta_{{\text{MX}}}^{{\text{(1)}L}} \) and \( C_{{\text{MX}}}^{\phi L} \)) were obtained. The values of apparent relative molar enthalpies (\( {}^{\phi }L \)) and relative partial molar enthalpies (\( \overline{{L_{2} }} \) and \( \overline{{L_{1} }} \)) of the solute and the solvent at different molalities were derived from the experimental enthalpy of dissolution values of the compound. Also, the standard molar enthalpy of formation of the anion \( {\text{C}}_{ 6} {\text{H}}_{ 4} \text{NO}_{2}^{-} \) in aqueous solution was calculated to be \( {\Delta_{\text{f}}^{} H}_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} ({\text{C}}_{ 6} {\text{H}}_{ 4} {\text{NO}}_{2}^{-} \text{,aq}) = - \left( {603.2 \pm 1.2} \right)\;{\text{kJ}}{\cdot}{\text{mol}}^{-1} \).     

Calibration of conductance cells at various temperatures

Precise conductance measurements on aqueous potassium chloride solutions at 0, 10, 18, and 25°C have been made under various conditions over a concentration range 10^?4?2 mole-dm^?3, yielding the conductance equations $$\begin{gathered} 25^\circ C:\Lambda = 149.873 - 95.01\sqrt c + 38.48c log c + 183.1c - 176.4c^{3/2} \hfill \\ 18^\circ C:\Lambda = 129.497 - 80.38\sqrt c + 32.87c log c + 154.3c - 143.0c^{3/2} \hfill \\ 10^\circ C:\Lambda = 107.359 - 64.98\sqrt c + 27.07c log c + 125.4c - 110.3c^{3/2} \hfill \\ 0^\circ C:\Lambda = 81.700 - 47.80\sqrt c + 20.60c log c + 93.8c - 79.3c^{3/2} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ which are proposed for calibration of conductance cells.     

Thermodynamic Model for ThO<Subscript>2</Subscript>(am) Solubility in Isosaccharinate Solutions

Extensive studies on ThO₂(am) solubility were carried out as functions of a wide range of isosaccharinate concentrations (0.0002 to 0.2 mol⋅kg⁻¹) at fixed pH values of about 6 and 12, and varying pH (ranging from 4.5 to 12) at fixed aqueous isosaccharinate concentrations of 0.008 mol⋅kg⁻¹ or 0.08 mol⋅kg⁻¹, to determine the aqueous complexes of isosaccharinate with Th(IV). The samples were equilibrated over periods ranging up to 69 days, and the data showed that, in most cases, steady-state concentrations were reached in <15 days. The data were interpreted using the SIT model, and required the inclusion of mixed hydroxy-ISA complexes of Th(IV) [Th(OH)ISA²⁺, Th(OH)₃(ISA)₂^-_{2}^{-}, and Th(OH)₄(ISA)₂^2-]_{2}^{2-}] with log ₁₀ K ⁰=12.5±0.5,4.4±0.5 and −3.2±0.5 for the reactions:

Studies on electron transfer reactions: reduction of heteropoly 10-tungstodivanadophosphate by <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">l</Emphasis>-cysteine in aqueous acid medium

l-cysteine undergoes facile electron transfer with heteropoly 10-tungstodivanadophosphate, [ \textPV^\textV \textV^\textV \textW _{1 0} \textO _{4 0} ]^{5 -} , \left[ {{\text{PV}}^{\text{V}} {\text{V}}^{\text{V}} {\text{W}}_{ 1 0} {\text{O}}_{ 4 0} } \right]^{5 - } , at ambient temperature in aqueous acid medium. The stoichiometric ratio of [cysteine]/[oxidant] is 2.0. The products of the reaction are cystine and two electron-reduced heteropoly blue, [PV^IVV^IVW₁₀O₄₀]⁷⁻. The rates of the electron transfer reaction were measured spectrophotometrically in acetate–acetic acid buffers at 25 °C. The orders of the reaction with respect to both [cysteine] and [oxidant] are unity, and the reaction exhibits simple second-order kinetics at constant pH. The pH-rate profile indicates the participation of deprotonated cysteine in the reaction. The reaction proceeds through an outer-sphere mechanism. For the dianion ⁻SCH₂CH(NH₃ ⁺)COO⁻, the rate constant for the cross electron transfer reaction is 96 M⁻¹s⁻¹ at 25 °C. The self-exchange rate constant for the ^- \textSCH₂ \textCH( \textNH₃ ⁺ )\textCOO ^- \mathord

Thermochemistry of paracetamol

Combustion calorimetry, Calvet-drop sublimation calorimetry, and the Knudsen effusion method were used to determine the standard (p ^o = 0.1 MPa) molar enthalpies of formation of monoclinic (form I) and gaseous paracetamol, at T = 298.15 K: \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text cr I ) = - ( 4 10.4 ±1. 3)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ cr I}}} \right) = - ( 4 10.4 \pm 1. 3){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} and \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text g ) = - ( 2 80.5 ±1. 9)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} . \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ g}}} \right) = - ( 2 80.5 \pm 1. 9){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} . From the obtained \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text cr I ) \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ cr I}}} \right) value and published data, it was also possible to derive the standard molar enthalpies of formation of the two other known polymorphs of paracetamol (forms II and III), at 298.15 K: \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text crII ) = - ( 40 8.4 ±1. 3)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ crII}}} \right) = - ( 40 8.4 \pm 1. 3){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} and \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text crIII ) = - ( 40 7.4 ±1. 3)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} . \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ crIII}}} \right) = - ( 40 7.4 \pm 1. 3){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} . The proposed \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text g ) \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ g}}} \right) value, together with the experimental enthalpies of formation of acetophenone and 4′-hydroxyacetophenone, taken from the literature, and a re-evaluated enthalpy of formation of acetanilide, \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textON,\text g ) = - ( 10 9. 2 ± 2. 2)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} , \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{ON}},{\text{ g}}} \right) = - ( 10 9. 2\,\pm\,2. 2){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} , were used to assess the predictions of the B3LYP/cc-pVTZ and CBS-QB3 methods for the enthalpy of a isodesmic and isogyric reaction involving those species. This test supported the reliability of the theoretical methods, and indicated a good thermodynamic consistency between the \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} (C₈H₉O₂N, g) value obtained in this study and the remaining experimental data used in the \Updelta_\textr H_\textm^\texto \Updelta_{\text{r}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} calculation. It also led to the conclusion that the presently recommended enthalpy of formation of gaseous acetanilide in Cox and Pilcher and Pedley’s compilations should be corrected by ~20 kJ mol⁻¹.     

Thermal investigations of SmFeTeO6 and SmCrTeO6 compounds

SmFeTeO₆ and SmCrTeO₆ were synthesized by heating the respective oxides in molar quantities and characterized by X-ray technique. Thermogravimetric studies suggested that SmFeTeO₆ and SmCrTeO₆ vapourize incongruently according to the reactions: $$ \begin{aligned} {\text{SmFeTeO}}_{ 6}{({\text{s}})} & \to {\text{SmFeO}}_{ 3} {( {\text{s}})} + {\text{TeO}}_{ 2} {( {\text{g}})} + \left( { 1/ 2} \right){\text{O}}_{ 2}{( {\text{g}})} \\ {\text{SmCrTeO}}_{ 6} {( {\text{s}})} & \to {\text{SmCrO}}_{ 3} {( {\text{s}})} + {\text{TeO}}_{ 2}{( {\text{g}})} + \left( { 1/ 2} \right){\text{O}}_{ 2}{( {\text{g}})}. \\ \end{aligned} $$ X-ray diffraction data of both the compounds have been indexed on the hexagonal system. Partial pressures of TeO₂(g) were measured over SmFeO₃(s) and SmCrO₃(s) by employing the Knudsen effusion mass loss technique. The standard Gibbs free energy of formation of (Δ_f G°) SmFeTeO₆(s) and SmCrTeO₆(s) were obtained from partial pressures and represented by the following relations: $$\Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{\circ} \left( {{\text{SmFeTeO}}_{6}{( {{\text{s}},\,T})}} \right) \pm 2 5\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} = - 1 5 1. 6 5+ 0. 1 5\left(T \right)\quad \left( 1 ,0 90{-} 1,1 80\,{\text{K}} \right) \\ \Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{\circ } \left( {{\text{SmCrTeO}}_{ 6} {( {{\text{s}},\,T})}} \right) \pm 2 5\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mole}}^{ - 1} = - 2 5 2. 8 6+ 0. 1 2(T)\quad \left( { 1,100 {-} 1 , 1 7 5\,{\text{K}}} \right).$$      

Protonierungskonstanten der 8-Hydroxychinolinat-Ionen bei 25°C und in 1m-NaClO4

The protonation of the 8-hydroxyquinolinate ion (Ox ^?) has been studied at 25°C in 1m-NaClO₄ by the potentiometric method and the distribution between CHCl₃ and H₂O. The experimental data are explained by the following equilibria: $$\begin{array}{*{20}c} {H^ + + Ox^ - \rightleftharpoons HOx} \\ {H^ + + Ox \rightleftharpoons H_2 Ox^ + } \\ {HOx_w \rightleftharpoons HOx_{org} } \\ \end{array} \begin{array}{*{20}c} {\log k_1 = 9.42 \pm 0.08} \\ {\log k_2 = 5.46 \pm 0.10} \\ {\log \lambda = 2.40 \pm 0.10} \\ \end{array} $$      

Mathematical modeling of solvent extraction of uranium from sulphate media employing 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid-mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (PC88A) and its mixture with trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) as extractants

The extraction of U(VI) from sulphate medium with 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid-mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (PC88A, H₂A₂ in dimeric form) in n-dodecane has been investigated under varying concentrations of sulphuric acid and uranium. Slope analysis of uranium (VI) distribution data as a function of PC88A concentration suggests the formation of monomeric species, viz. UO₂(HA₂)₂. This observation was further supported by the mathematical expression obtained during non-linear least square regression analysis of U(VI) distribution data correlating the percentage extraction (%E) and the acidity (H _i). A mathematical model correlating the experimental distribution ratio values of U(VI) (D _U) with initial acidity (H _i) and initial uranium concentrations (C _i) was developed: D_\textU = 12.98( ±0.90)/{ C_\texti ^{- 0.75( ±0.05)} ×[ H_\texti ]² } D_{\text{U}} = 12.98( \pm 0.90)/\left\{ {C_{\text{i}}^{ - 0.75( \pm 0.05)} \times \left[ {H_{\text{i}} } \right]^{2} } \right\} . This expression can be used to predict the concentration of uranium in organic as well as in aqueous phase at any C _i and H _i. The extraction data were used to calculate the conditional extraction constant (K _ex) values at different acidities (2–7 M H⁺), uranium (0.02–0.1 M) and PC88A (0.2–0.6 M) concentrations. These studies were also extended for the extraction of U(VI) using synergistic mixtures of PC88A and TOPO from sulphate medium.