有机-无机杂化L-Rh/SiO2氢甲酰化催化剂的研究Ⅱ.L-Rh/SiO2的催化性能及表征

 以具有不同电子结构的有机膦直接修饰Rh/SiO2制备了有机-无机杂化L-Rh/SiO2催化剂,并考察了催化剂对1-己烯氢甲酰化反应的催化性能. 结果表明, P(OPh)3-Rh/SiO2催化剂上1-己烯氢甲酰化反应的TOF可高达4111 h-1,而PCy3-Rh/SiO2催化剂上生成醛的选择性为100%. 不同催化剂活性的顺序为P(OPh)3-Rh/SiO2＞PPh3-Rh/SiO2＞PCy3-Rh/SiO2,其选择性的顺序则与之相反. TG表征结果表明,有机膦与Rh之间相互作用强度的顺序为PCy3-Rh/SiO2＞PPh3-Rh/SiO2＞P(OPh)3-Rh/SiO2. 因此,有机膦给电子的能力越强,则与Rh之间相互作用的能力越强,催化剂体系越稳定,1-己烯氢甲酰化反应的活性越低,而庚醛的选择性越高.     

经PPh3修饰的Rh/SiO2催化剂的吸附-脱附性能

 应用程序升温技术研究了氢甲酰化反应物CO,H2和C2H4在经PPh3修饰的Rh/SiO2(PPh3-Rh/SiO2)催化剂上的吸附-脱附行为. CO-TPD结果显示, Rh/SiO2催化剂在348, 398和525 K处有3个脱附峰, PPh3-Rh/SiO2催化剂仅在368 K处出现脱附峰,表明催化剂的吸附性能发生了明显变化. 采用原位红外光谱研究了PPh3-Rh/SiO2催化剂上CO的吸附态. 结果表明, 2040 cm-1处吸收峰归属于PPh3修饰的Rh粒子上线式吸附的CO. 这种吸附态既不同于Rh/SiO2多相催化剂表面Rh粒子上的CO吸附态,也不同于相应均相催化剂中的羰基配位态. TPD和FT-IR结果表明,在低压下PPh3-Rh/SiO2催化剂对氢甲酰化反应已具有相当的催化性能.     

有机-无机杂化L-Rh/SiO2氢甲酰化催化剂的研究Ⅰ.PPh3-Rh/SiO2的催化性能及表征

 利用有机-无机杂化的概念,以三苯基膦直接修饰Rh/SiO2制备了PPh3-Rh/SiO2多相催化剂. 在浆态床烯烃氢甲酰化反应中,该催化剂在10 MPa,373 K温和条件下的活性和选择性远高于Rh/SiO2的活性和选择性,与相应的均相催化剂HRhCO(PPh3)3的性能相当,且具有易分离的优点. 31P MAS NMR和XPS技术表征结果表明,催化剂中的配体PPh3与高度分散的Rh之间存在配位作用,形成了兼具多相和均相催化性能的有机-无机杂化催化剂. 该催化剂对不同碳数烯烃的氢甲酰化反应都具有较好的催化性能.     

有机-无机杂化L-Rh／SiO2氢甲酰化催化剂的研究I．PPh3-Rh／SiO2的催化性能及表征

利用有机-无机杂化的概念，以三苯基膦直接修饰Rh／SiO2制备了PPh3-Rh／SiO2多相催化剂．在浆态床烯烃氢甲酰化反应中，该催化剂在1．0MPa，373K温和条件下的活性和选择性远高于Rh／SiO2的活性和选择性，与相应的均相催化剂HRhCO(PPh3)3的性能相当，且具有易分离的优点．^31P MAS NMR和XPS技术表征结果表明，催化剂中的配体PPh3与高度分散的Rh之间存在配位作用，形成了兼具多相和均相催化性能的有机一无机杂化催化剂．该催化剂对不同碳数烯烃的氢甲酰化反应都具有较好的催化性能．     

PPh3修饰介孔泡沫材料负载的Rh催化剂用于固定床氢甲酰化反应

 介孔泡沫材料（MCF）是一种孔径有序,孔结构无序,稳定性高的新型纯硅基分子筛。MCF的开放式孔结构和可调变孔径使其适合于做催化剂的载体. 我们采用MCF为载体制备了PPh3-Rh/MCF催化剂,并应用于固定床中的丙烯氢甲酰化反应中（丙烯转化率21.6%,丁醛的时空收率160.6 mol醛/mol Rh·小时,正异比10.4）.PPh3-Rh/MCF催化剂的稳定性远远高于HRh(CO)(PPh3)3/MCF催化剂.     

新型水溶性配体-负载金属氢甲酰化催化剂:TPPTS-Rh/SiO2

考察了几种硅胶负载贵金属催化剂和HRhCO(TPP)3催化剂的1-己烯氢甲酰化反应,对Rh/SiO2、 HRhCO(TPPTS)3/SiO2 和TPPTS-Rh/SiO2上的1-己烯氢甲酰化结果进行了比较.结果表明, TPPTS-Rh/SiO2催化剂的醛的选择性和醛的正异比n/b接近HRhCO(TPPTS)3/SiO2 的相应的催化性能,而远高于Rh/SiO2的相应的催化性能, 7.0 MPa高压下TPPTS-Rh/SiO2催化剂的活性大幅度增加,达到0.0692 S-1.实验排除了其他可能,认为是含有孤对电子的TPPTS 和Rh/SiO2中高度分散的Rh粒子产生了化学键的作用,形成了具有匀相性能的支撑水膜多相催化剂: TPPTS-Rh/SiO2.     

铑-膦配位催化烯烃氢甲酰化反应研究

本文研究了由Rh2(CO)4CI2分别与两种膦配体4－下丁苯基二苯基膦（1）和4－正辛苯基二苯基磷（2）形成的原位催化剂体系对烯烃氢甲酰化反应的催化性能。对影响反应的各种因素,如P／Rh物质的量比、反应温度、反应压力,不同烯烃等的影响作了探讨。结果表明,配体1、2与Rh2(CO4)CI2形成的原位催化剂体系的催化活性与选择性均高于结构相似的PPh3,在相同的条件下,不同烯烃的氢甲酰化反应活性依直链烯烃＞苯乙烯＞直链内烯＞环己烯的顺序递增。     

铑配合物催化丁烯氢甲酰化性能的研究

制备了一系列铑配合物,并对其催化丁烯氢甲酰化的催化性能进行了研究.在1-丁烯的反应中,RhCl(PPh3)3和trans-RhCl(CO)(PPh3)2的反应速度很慢,而RhH(CO)(PPh3)3、Rh(CO)2(acac)和 Rh(CO)(acac)(PPh3)三者反应速度都很快.而不同丁烯原料氢甲酰化的反应速度也各不相同,反应速度依次为1-丁烯》2-丁烯》异丁烯.     

超细SiO2负载型水溶性铑膦配合物催化剂研究

用超细SiO2负载水溶性铑膦配合物,并研究其对1-已烯氢甲酰化的催化性能。结果表明,粒径为10-20nm的超细SiO2负载水溶性铑膦配合物所表现的催化活性比颗粒SiO2负载型催化剂高3倍多,且可在较宽的含水量范围内保持高反应活性。当膦铑摩尔比为50,超细SiO2负载型催化剂含水量为25%-55%（质量分数）、烯铑摩尔比为2500、反应温度373K和CO/H2（1/1,体积比）压力4.0MPa的反应条件下,其1-已烯氢甲酰化的反应转化数为450h^-1,产物醛的选择性为100%,醛的n/i比值达3.2。     

双膦配体的合成及铑-双膦配体催化剂对混合辛烯氢甲酰化反应的催化行为

合成了具有不同电子效应的 3种双膦配体 .其给电子性为 Ph2 P(CH2 ) 4 PPh2 >Ph2 P(O) (CH2 ) 4 PPh2 >Ph2 P(O) (CH2 ) 4 P(O) Ph2 .这 3种配体与醋酸铑二聚体配合物构成的催化剂 ,在混合辛烯的均相氢甲酰化反应中表现出的活性和选择性与配体给电子性强弱的次序完全相反 .我们认为 ,具有弱配位性的 [Rh(CH3COO) 2 ]2 Ph2 P-(O) (CH2 ) 4 P(O) Ph2 催化体系 ,因其形成的活性物种的活泼性高 ,有利于惰性的长碳链混合辛烯的活化转化 .对该体系循环使用的结果表明 ,经历 3次循环后 ,催化剂活性逐渐降低 .     

In situ formation of HRh(CO)2(PPh3)2 active species on the surface of a SBA-15 supported heterogeneous catalyst and the effect of support pore size on the hydroformylation of propene

A method of in situ formation of HRh(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ active species on the surface of heterogeneous Rh/SBA-15 catalyst has been developed and confirmed in this work. The amount of active species formed inside the pores can be controlled by the support pore size. This class of PPh₃-Rh/SBA-15 catalyst has been employed in propene hydroformylation to be highly active, selective, stable, easily workable and recyclable. Using TEM, solid-state ³¹P MAS NMR, and in situ FT-IR, HRh(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ active species can be characterized.     

Catalytic olefin hydrogenation with the application of a new water soluble rhodium catalyst

The catalyst precursor preparedin situ from rhodium dimer [Rh(cod)Cl]₂ and a new water-soluble phosphine Ph₂PCH₂CH₂CONHC(CH₃)₂CH₂SO₃H (in Li⁺ salt form) has been found to act as an effective olefin hydrogenation catalyst. Catalytic hydrogenation reactions have been tested in either two phase: aqueous catalyst/insoluble olefin or methanolic catalyst/olefin systems. The observed reaction rates were higher for terminal than for internal olefins. 1-Hexene in methanolic solution has been hydrogenated with a turnover frequency of about 8000 h^–1. This system has also been applied in the form of a supported aqueous phase catalyst.     

Markovnikov hydroformylation catalyzed by ROPAC in the presence of phosphine and phosphine oxide ligands

Rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation of 1-octene in the presence of different phosphine and phosphine oxide ligands has been investigated. The molecular structure of new phosphine ligand, fluorenylidine methyl phenyl diphenylphosphine, was determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography. Parameters such as different ligands, molar ratio of ligand to rhodium complex, ratio of olefin to rhodium complex, pressure of CO : H₂ mixture, and time of the reaction were studied. The linear aldehyde was the main product when the phosphine ligands were used as auxiliary ligands while the selectivity was changed to the branched products when the related phosphine oxide ligands were used. Under optimized reaction conditions, in the presence of [Rh(acac)(CO)(Ph₃P)]-di(1-naphthyl)phenyl phosphine oxide, conversion of 1-octene reached 97% with 87% selectivity of branched aldehyde.     

Oxidative addition of different electrophiles with rhodium(I) carbonyl complexes of unsymmetrical phosphine–phosphine monoselenide ligands

Dimeric chlorobridge complex [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂ reacts with two equivalents of a series of unsymmetrical phosphine–phosphine monoselenide ligands, Ph₂P(CH₂)_nP(Se)Ph₂ {n = 1( a ), 2( b ), 3( c ), 4( d )}to form chelate complex [Rh(CO)Cl(P∩Se)] ( 1a ) {P∩Se = η²‐(P,Se) coordinated} and non‐chelate complexes [Rh(CO)₂Cl(P～Se)] ( 1b–d ) {P～Se = η¹‐(P) coordinated}. The complexes 1 undergo oxidative addition reactions with different electrophiles such as CH₃I, C₂H₅I, C₆H₅CH₂Cl and I₂ to produce Rh(III) complexes of the type [Rh(COR)ClX(P∩Se)] {where R = ? C₂H₅ ( 2a ), X = I; R = ? CH₂C₆H₅ ( 3a ), X = Cl}, [Rh(CO)ClI₂(P∩Se)] ( 4a ), [Rh(CO)(COCH₃)ClI(P～Se)] ( 5b–d ), [Rh(CO)(COH₅)ClI‐(P～Se)] ( 6b–d ), [Rh(CO)(COCH₂C₆H₅)Cl₂(P～Se)] ( 7b–d ) and [Rh(CO)ClI₂(P～Se)] ( 8b–d ). The kinetic study of the oxidative addition (OA) reactions of the complexes 1 with CH₃I and C₂H₅I reveals a single stage kinetics. The rate of OA of the complexes varies with the length of the ligand backbone and follows the order 1a > 1b > 1c > 1d . The CH₃I reacts with the different complexes at a rate 10–100 times faster than the C₂H₅I. The catalytic activity of complexes 1b–d for carbonylation of methanol is evaluated and a higher turnover number (TON) is obtained compared with that of the well‐known commercial species [Rh(CO)₂I₂]^?. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Rhodium(I) carbonyl complexes of ether‐phosphine ligands and their reactivity

The reactions of dimeric complex [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂ with hemilabile ether‐phosphine ligands Ph₂P(CH₂) _nOR [n = 1, R = CH₃ (a); n = 2, R = C₂H₅ (b)] yield cis‐[Rh(CO)₂Cl(P ～ O)] (1) [P ～ O = η ¹‐(P) coordinated]. Halide abstraction reactions of 1 with AgClO₄ produce cis‐[Rh(CO)₂(P ∩ O)]ClO₄ (2) [P ∩ O = η ²‐(P,O)chelated]. Oxidative addition reactions of 1 with CH₃I and I₂ give rhodium(III) complexes [Rh(CO)(COCH₃)ClI(P ∩ O)] (3) and [Rh(CO)ClI₂(P ∩ O)] (4) respectively. The complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses, IR, ¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. The catalytic activity of 1 for carbonylation of methanol is higher than that of the well‐known [Rh(CO)₂I₂]^? species. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Rhodium Complexes in P−H Bond Activation Reactions

The feasibility of oxidative addition of the P−H bond of PHPh₂ to a series of rhodium complexes to give mononuclear hydrido-phosphanido complexes has been analyzed. Three main scenarios have been found depending on the nature of the L ligand added to [Rh(Tp)(C₂H₄)(PHPh₂)] (Tp= hydridotris(pyrazolyl)borate): i) clean and quantitative reactions to terminal hydrido-phosphanido complexes [RhTp(H)(PPh₂)(L)] (L=PMe₃, PMe₂Ph and PHPh₂), ii) equilibria between Rh^I and Rh^III species: [RhTp(H)(PPh₂)(L)]⇄[RhTp(PHPh₂)(L)] (L=PMePh₂, PPh₃) and iii) a simple ethylene replacement to give the rhodium(I) complexes [Rh(κ²-Tp)(L)(PHPh₂)] (L=NHCs-type ligands). The position of the P−H oxidative addition–reductive elimination equilibrium is mainly determined by sterics influencing the entropy contribution of the reaction. When ethylene was used as a ligand, the unique rhodaphosphacyclobutane complex [Rh(Tp)(η¹-Et)(κ^C,P-CH₂CH₂PPh₂)] was obtained. DFT calculations revealed that the reaction proceeds through the rate limiting oxidative addition of the P−H bond, followed by a low-barrier sequence of reaction steps involving ethylene insertion into the Rh−H and Rh−P bonds. In addition, oxidative addition of the P−H bond in OPHPh₂ to [Rh(Tp)(C₂H₄)(PHPh₂)] gave the related hydride complex [RhTp(H)(PHPh₂)(POPh₂)], but ethyl complexes resulted from hydride insertion into the Rh−ethylene bond in the reaction with [Rh(Tp)(C₂H₄)₂].     

{μ‐PbSe}: A Heavy CO Homologue as an Unexpected Ligand

Reactions of [K(18‐crown‐6)]₂[Pb₂Se₃] and [K([2.2.2]crypt)]₂[Pb₂Se₃] with [Rh(PPh₃)₃Cl] in en (ethane‐1,2‐diamine) afforded ionic compounds with [Rh₃(PPh₃)₆(μ₃‐Se)₂]^? and [Rh₃(CN)₂(PPh₃)₄(μ₃‐Se)₂(μ‐PbSe)]^3? anions, respectively. The latter contains a PbSe ligand, a rather uncommon homologue of CO that acts as a μ‐bridge between two Rh atoms. Quantum chemical calculations yield a significantly higher bond energy for PbSe than for CO, since the size of the ligand orbitals better matches the comparably rigid Rh‐Se‐Rh angles and the resulting Rh???Rh distance. To rationalize the bent coordination of the ligand, orbitals with significant ligand contributions and their dependence on the bonding angle were investigated in detail.