Field‐Induced Slow Magnetic Relaxation in a Mononuclear Manganese(III)–Porphyrin Complex

We report on a novel manganese(III)–porphyrin complex with the formula [Mn^III(TPP)(3,5‐Me₂pyNO)₂]ClO₄?CH₃CN ( 2 ; 3,5‐Me₂pyNO=3,5‐dimethylpyridine N‐oxide, H₂TPP=5,10,15,20‐tetraphenylporphyrin), in which the Mn^III ion is six‐coordinate with two monodentate 3,5‐Me₂pyNO molecules and a tetradentate TPP ligand to build a tetragonally elongated octahedral geometry. The environment in 2 is responsible for the large and negative axial zero‐field splitting (D=?3.8 cm^?1), low rhombicity (E/|D|=0.04) of the high‐spin Mn^III ion, and, ultimately, for the observation of slow magnetic‐relaxation effects (E_a=15.5 cm^?1 at H=1000 G) in this rare example of a manganese‐based single‐ion magnet (SIM). Structural, magnetic, and electronic characterizations were carried out by means of single‐crystal diffraction studies, variable‐temperature direct‐ and alternating‐current measurements and high‐frequency and ‐field EPR spectroscopic analysis followed by quantum‐chemical calculations. Slow magnetic‐relaxation effects were also observed in the already known analogous compound [Mn^III(TPP)Cl] ( 1 ; E_a=10.5 cm^?1 at H=1000 G). The results obtained for 1 and 2 are compared and discussed herein.     

Field‐Induced Single‐Ion Magnetic Behavior in Two Mononuclear Cobalt(II) Complexes

The employment of a new rigid N‐tridentate ligand, bis(1‐chloroimidazo[1,5‐a]pyridin‐3‐yl)pyridine (bcpp), in the construction of cobalt(II) single‐ion magnets is reported. Two cobalt(II) complexes, [Co(bcpp)Cl₂] ( 1 ) and [Co(bcpp)Br₂] ( 2 ), have been prepared and characterized. Single‐crystal XRD analyses reveal that complexes 1 and 2 are isostructural. They are pentacoordinated mononuclear cobalt(II) compounds with expected trigonal bipyramidal geometry. Both analysis of the magnetic data and ab initio calculations reveal easy‐plane magnetic anisotropy (D>0) for 1 and 2 . Detailed alternating current magnetic susceptibility measurements reveal the occurrence of slow magnetic relaxation behavior for the cobalt(II) centers of 1 and 2 ; thus indicating that both complexes are field‐induced single‐ion magnets.     

Magnetostructural Correlations in Tetrairon(III) Single‐Molecule Magnets

Tunable single‐molecule magnets : The spin‐level landscape in a series of Fe^III₄ single‐molecule magnets with propeller‐like structure was analyzed by means of high‐frequency EPR spectroscopy. The zero‐field splitting parameter D of the ground S=5 spin state correlates strongly with the pitch of the propeller γ (see picture), and thus provides a simple link between molecular structure and magnetic behavior.

     

A cis‐Divacant Octahedral and Mononuclear Iron(IV) Imide

A rare, low‐spin Fe^IV imide complex [(pyrr₂py)Fe?NAd] (pyrr₂py^2?=bis(pyrrolyl)pyridine; Ad=1‐adamantyl) confined to a cis‐divacant octahedral geometry, was prepared by reduction of N₃Ad by the Fe^II precursor [(pyrr₂py)Fe(OEt₂)]. The imide complex is low‐spin with temperature‐independent paramagnetism. In comparison to an authentic Fe^III complex, such as [(pyrr₂py)FeCl], the pyrr₂py^2? ligand is virtually redox innocent.     

Polarized Neutron Diffraction to Probe Local Magnetic Anisotropy of a Low‐Spin Fe(III) Complex

We have determined by polarized neutron diffraction (PND) the low‐temperature molecular magnetic susceptibility tensor of the anisotropic low‐spin complex PPh₄[Fe^III(Tp)(CN)₃]?H₂O. We found the existence of a pronounced molecular easy magnetization axis, almost parallel to the C₃ pseudo‐axis of the molecule, which also corresponds to a trigonal elongation direction of the octahedral coordination sphere of the Fe^III ion. The PND results are coherent with electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, magnetometry, and ab initio investigations. Through this particular example, we demonstrate the capabilities of PND to provide a unique, direct, and straightforward picture of the magnetic anisotropy and susceptibility tensors, offering a clear‐cut way to establish magneto‐structural correlations in paramagnetic molecular complexes.     

Controlling Metal–Ligand–Metal Oxidation State Combinations by Ancillary Ligand (L) Variation in the Redox Systems [L2Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL2]n,boptz=3,6‐bis(2‐oxidophenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine,and L=acetylacetonate, 2,2′‐bipyridine,or 2‐phenylazopyridine

The new compounds [(acac)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(acac)₂] ( 1 ), [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ‐(ClO₄)₂), and [(pap)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(pap)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 3 ‐(ClO₄)₂) were obtained from 3,6‐bis(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine (H₂boptz), the crystal structure analysis of which is reported. Compound 1 contains two antiferromagnetically coupled (J=?36.7 cm^?1) Ru^III centers. We have investigated the role of both the donor and acceptor functions containing the boptz^2? bridging ligand in combination with the electronically different ancillary ligands (donating acac^?, moderately π‐accepting bpy, and strongly π‐accepting pap; acac=acetylacetonate, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine pap=2‐phenylazopyridine) by using cyclic voltammetry, spectroelectrochemistry and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for several in situ accessible redox states. We found that metal–ligand–metal oxidation state combinations remain invariant to ancillary ligand change in some instances; however, three isoelectronic paramagnetic cores Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru showed remarkable differences. The excellent tolerance of the bpy co ‐ ligand for both Ru^III and Ru^II is demonstrated by the adoption of the mixed ‐ valent form in [L₂Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL₂]³⁺, L=bpy, whereas the corresponding system with pap stabilizes the Ru^II states to yield a phenoxyl radical ligand and the compound with L=acac^? contains two Ru^III centers connected by a tetrazine radical‐anion bridge.     

Stabilization of a Two‐Coordinate Mononuclear Cobalt(0) Compound

Compound (Me₂‐cAAC:)₂Co⁰ ( 2 ; Me₂‐cAAC:=cyclic (alkyl) amino carbene; :C(CH₂)(CMe₂)₂N‐2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) was synthesized by the reduction of the precursor (Me₂‐cAAC:)₂Co^ICl ( 1 ) with KC₈ in THF. The cyclic voltammogram of 1 exhibited one‐electron reduction, which suggests that synthesis of a bent 2‐metallaallene ( 2 ) from 1 should be possible. Compound 2 contains one cobalt atom in the formal oxidation state zero, which is stabilized by two Me₂‐cAAC: ligands. Bond lengths from X‐ray diffraction are 1.871(2) and 1.877(2) Å with a C‐Co‐C bond angle of 170.12(8)°. The EPR spectrum of 2 exhibited a broad resonance attributed to the unique quasi‐linear structure, which favors near degeneracy and gives rise to very rapid relaxation conditions. The cAAC?Co bond in 2 can be considered as a typical Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson type of bonding, which in turn retains 2.5 electron pairs on the Co atom as nonbonding electrons.     

Homoleptic Organoderivatives of High‐Valent Nickel(III)

Homoleptic perhalophenyl derivatives of divalent nickel complexes with the general formula [NBu₄]₂[Ni^II (C₆X₅)₄] [X=F ( 1 ), Cl ( 2 )] have been prepared by low‐temperature treatment of the halo‐complex precursor [NBu₄]₂[NiBr₄] with the corresponding organolithium reagent LiC₆X₅. Compounds 1 and 2 are electrochemically related by reversible one‐electron exchange processes with the corresponding organometallate(III) compounds [NBu₄][Ni^III (C₆X₅)₄] [X=F ( 3 ), Cl ( 4 )]. The potentials of the [Ni^III (C₆X₅)₄]^?/[Ni^II (C₆X₅)₄]^2? couples are +0.07 and ?0.11 V for X=F or Cl, respectively. Compounds 3 and 4 have also been prepared and isolated in good yield by chemical oxidation of 1 or 2 with bromine or the amminium salt [N(C₆H₄Br‐4)₃][SbCl₆]. The [Ni^III (C₆X₅)₄]^? species have SP‐4 structures in the salts 3 and 4 , as established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction methods. The [Ni^II (C₆F₅)₄]^2? ion in the parent compound 1 has also been found to exhibit a rather similar SP‐4 structure. According to their SP‐4 geometry, the Ni^III compounds (d⁷) behave as S=1/2 systems both at microscopic (EPR) and macroscopic levels (ac and dc magnetization measurements). The spin Hamiltonian parameters obtained from the analysis of the magnetic behavior of 3 and 4 within the framework of ligand field theory show that the unpaired electron is centered mainly on the metal atom, with >97 % estimated d contribution. Thermal decomposition of 3 and 4 proceeds with formation of the corresponding C₆X₅? C₆X₅ coupling compounds.     

Pulsed‐EPR Evidence of a Manganese(II) Hydroxycarbonyl Intermediate in the Electrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide by a Manganese Bipyridyl Derivative

A key intermediate in the electroconversion of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide, catalyzed by a manganese tris(carbonyl) complex, is characterized. Different catalytic pathways and their potential reaction mechanisms are investigated using a large range of experimental and computational techniques. Sophisticated spectroscopic methods including UV/Vis absorption and pulsed‐EPR techniques (2P‐ESEEM and HYSCORE) were combined together with DFT calculations to successfully identify a key intermediate in the catalytic cycle of CO₂ reduction. The results directly show the formation of a metal–carboxylic acid–CO₂ adduct after oxidative addition of CO₂ and H⁺ to a Mn⁰ carbonyl dimer, an unexpected intermediate.     

Unraveling σ and π Effects on Magnetic Anisotropy in cis‐NiA4B2 Complexes: Magnetization,HF‐HFEPR Studies,First‐Principles Calculations,and Orbital Modeling

By using complementary experimental techniques and first‐principles theoretical calculations, magnetic anisotropy in a series of five hexacoordinated nickel(II) complexes possessing a symmetry close to C_2v, has been investigated. Four complexes have the general formula [Ni(bpy)X₂]ⁿ⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine; X₂=bpy ( 1 ), (NCS^?)₂ ( 2 ), C₂O₄^2? ( 3 ), NO₃^? ( 4 )). In the fifth complex, [Ni(HIM₂‐py)₂(NO₃)]⁺ ( 5 ; HIM₂‐py=2‐(2‐pyridyl)‐4,4,5,5‐tetramethyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazolyl‐1‐hydroxy), which was reported previously, the two bpy bidentate ligands were replaced by HIM₂‐py. Analysis of the high‐field, high‐frequency electronic paramagnetic resonance (HF‐HFEPR) spectra and magnetization data leads to the determination of the spin Hamiltonian parameters. The D parameter, corresponding to the axial magnetic anisotropy, was negative (Ising type) for the five compounds and ranged from ?1 to ?10 cm^?1. First‐principles SO‐CASPT2 calculations have been performed to estimate these parameters and rationalize the experimental values. From calculations, the easy axis of magnetization is in two different directions for complexes 2 and 3 , on one hand, and 4 and 5 , on the other hand. A new method is proposed to calculate the g tensor for systems with S=1. The spin Hamiltonian parameters (D (axial), E (rhombic), and g_i) are rationalized in terms of ordering of the 3 d orbitals. According to this orbital model, it can be shown that 1) the large magnetic anisotropy of 4 and 5 arises from splitting of the e_g‐like orbitals and is due to the difference in the σ‐donor strength of NO₃^? and bpy or HIM₂‐py, whereas the difference in anisotropy between the two compounds is due to splitting of the t_2g‐like orbitals; and 2) the anisotropy of complexes 1 – 3 arises from the small splitting of the t_2g‐like orbitals. The direction of the anisotropy axis can be rationalized by the proposed orbital model.     

A New Quantum Chemical Approach to the Magnetic Properties of Oligonuclear Transition‐Metal Complexes: Application to a Model for the Tetranuclear Manganese Cluster of Photosystem II

Broken‐symmetry DFT calculations on transition‐metal clusters with more than two centers allow the hyperfine coupling constants to be extracted. Application of the proposed theoretical scheme to a tetranuclear manganese complex that models the S₂ state of the oxygen‐evolving complex of photosystem II yields hyperfine parameters that can be directly compared with experimental data. The picture shows the metal–oxo core of the model and the following parameters; exchange coupling constant J_ij, the expectation value of the site‐spin operator , and the isotropic hyperfine coupling parameters.

     

On Ammonia Binding to the Oxygen‐Evolving Complex of Photosystem II: A Quantum Chemical Study

A recent EPR study (M. Perrez Navarro et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.­ 2013 , 110, 15561) provided evidence that ammonia binding to the oxygen‐evolving complex (OEC) of photosystem II in its S₂ state takes place at a terminal‐water binding position (W1) on the “dangler” manganese center Mn_A. This contradicted earlier interpretations of ¹⁴N electron‐spin‐echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) and extended X‐ray absorption fine‐structure (EXAFS) data, which were taken to indicate replacement of a bridging oxo ligand by an NH₂ unit. Here we have used systematic broken‐symmetry density functional theory calculations on large (ca. 200 atom) model clusters of an extensive variety of substitution patterns and core geometries to examine these contradictory pieces of evidence. Computed relative energies clearly favor the terminal substitution pattern over bridging‐ligand arrangements (by about 20–30 kcal mol^?1) and support W1 as the preferred binding site. Computed ¹⁴N EPR nuclear‐quadrupole coupling tensors confirm previous assumptions that the appreciable asymmetry may be accounted for by strong, asymmetric hydrogen bonding to the bound terminal NH₃ ligand (mainly by Asp61). Indeed, bridging NH₂ substitution would lead to exaggerated asymmetries. Although our computed structures confirm that the reported elongation of an Mn–Mn distance by about 0.15 Å inferred from EXAFS experiments may only be reproduced by bridging NH₂ substitution, it seems possible that the underlying EXAFS data were skewed by problems due to radiation damage. Overall, the present data clearly support the suggested terminal NH₃ coordination at the W1 site. The finding is significant for the proposed mechanistic scenarios of OEC catalysis, as this is not a water substrate site, and effects of this ammonia binding on catalysis thus must be due to more indirect influences on the likely substrate binding site at the O5 bridging‐oxygen position.