The insertion of cycloheptatriene and cyclohepta-1,3-diene into the RuH bond of RuHCl(PPh3)3 to give Ru(η5-C7H9)Cl(PPh3)2 and Ru(η3-C7H11)Cl(PPh3)2

RuHCl(PPh₃)₃ reacts quantitatively with cycloheptatriene in CH₂Cl₂ at 35°C in 15 min to give Ru(η⁵-C₇H₉)Cl(PPh₃)₂ and PPh₃. The major isomer adopts a conformation with inequivalent phosphorus ligands and no plane of symmetry through the C₇H₉ ligand, but rapid intramolecular scrambling with δG³ = 10.6 kcal mol⁻¹ results in an averaged ¹H, ¹³C, and ³¹P NMR spectrum at room temperature. RuHCl(PPh₃)₃ reacts with cyclohepta-1,3-diene to give initially Ru(η³-C₇H₁₁)Cl(PPh₃)₂, but in a subsequent reaction this is dehydrogenated to give Ru(η⁵-C₇H₉)Cl(PPh₃)₂.     

Reactions of 1,4-difeffocenylbuta-1,3-diyne and 1,4-diphenylbut-l-en-3-yne with Ru3(CO)12. Crystal structure of Ru3(CO)8(μ3-η-1-η1-η4-η2-C4Ph2(CH=CHPh)2)

Diyne FcCmCC.CFc (Fc is ferrocenyl) reacts with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in boiling hexane to yield binuclear complexes Ru₂ and Ru₂(CO)₆(C₄Fc₂(C=CFc)₂C=O) containing ruthenacyclopentadiene and diruthenacycloheptadienone rings, respectively. The isomerism of the complexes is due to the different ways of coupling of the alkyne fragments of the diyne, namely, head-to-head, head-to-tail or tail-to-tail. The reaction of enyne PhC=CCH=CHPh with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ under similar conditions gives isomeric binuclear complexes Ru₂(CO)₆(C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂) and trinuclear clusters Ru₃(CO)₆(w-CO)₂(C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂) and Ru₃(CO)₈(₃-,¹-¹-⁴-² C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂). The structure of the latter was determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. The Ru₃ triangle coordinates eight terminal CO groups and the organic ligand resulting from the head-to-head dimerization of enyne molecules; the ruthenacyclopentadiene moiety is ⁴-coordinated to the Ru(CO)₂ group, and the third ruthenium atom is 2-bound to one of the PhCH=CH groups.Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 5, pp. 1261–1267, May, 1996.     

Isolation of Bis- and Mono-Cyclometallated Ru−IMes Complexes upon Reaction of [Ru(PPh3)3HCl], IMes and ZnMe2

Addition of an excess of ZnMe₂ to a mixture of [Ru(PPh₃)₃HCl] and IMes (IMes=1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazolin-2-ylidene) yields the bis-cyclometallated complex, [Ru(IMes)“(PPh₃)₂] 2 , together with the mono-cyclometallated, Ru−Zn heterobimetallic complex [Ru(IMes)′(PPh₃)₂(ZnMe)] 3 . Treatment of 2 with H₂, PhSiH₃ or pinacolborane yields the previously reported complex, [Ru(IMes)′(PPh₃)₂H] 1 , the synthesis of which has been reinvestigated. Further studies of small molecule reactivity show that 1 adds H₂ to give [Ru(IMes)(PPh₃)₂H₄] 4 , whilst 2 reacts with catecholborane to give [Ru(IMes-Bcat)′(PPh₃)₂H] 5 , in which (IMes-Bcat)′ signifies a borylated NHC ligand that is singly-metallated onto Ru. Treatment of 2 with CO gives the 18-electron dicarbonyl product [Ru(IMes)”(PPh₃)(CO)₂] 6 . Compounds 1 – 3 , 5 and 6 have been structurally characterised.     

Comparison of the Bonding of Benzene and C60 to a Metal Cluster: Ru3(CO)9(μ3-η2,η 2,η2-C6H6) and Ru3(CO)9(μ3-η2,η2,η2-C60)

The electron distributions and bonding in Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆H₆) and Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) are examined via electronic structure calculations in order to compare the nature of ligation of benzene and buckminsterfullerene to the common Ru₃(CO)₉ inorganic cluster. A fragment orbital approach, which is aided by the relatively high symmetry that these molecules possess, reveals important features of the electronic structures of these two systems. Reported crystal structures show that both benzene and C₆₀ are geometrically distorted when bound to the metal cluster fragment, and our ab initio calculations indicate that the energies of these distortions are similar. The experimental Ru–C_fullerene bond lengths are shorter than the corresponding Ru–C_benzene distances and the Ru–Ru bond lengths are longer in the fullerene-bound cluster than for the benzene-ligated cluster. Also, the carbonyl stretching frequencies are slightly higher for Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) than for Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆H₆). As a whole, these observations suggest that electron density is being pulled away from the metal centers and CO ligands to form stronger Ru–C_fullerene than Ru–C_benzene bonds. Fenske-Hall molecular orbital calculations show that an important interaction is donation of electron density in the metal–metal bonds to empty orbitals of C₆₀ and C₆H₆. Bonds to the metal cluster that result from this interaction are the second highest occupied orbitals of both systems. A larger amount of density is donated to C₆₀ than to C₆H₆, thus accounting for the longer metal–metal bonds in the fullerene-bound cluster. The principal metal–arene bonding modes are the same in both systems, but the more band-like electronic structure of the fullerene (i.e., the greater number density of donor and acceptor orbitals in a given energy region) as compared to C₆H₆ permits a greater degree of electron flow and stronger bonding between the Ru₃(CO)₉ and C₆₀ fragments. Of significance to the reduction chemistry of M₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) molecules, the HOMO is largely localized on the metal–carbonyl fragment and the LUMO is largely localized on the C₆₀ portion of the molecule. The localized C₆₀ character of the LUMO is consistent with the similarity of the first two reductions of this class of molecules to the first two reductions of free C₆₀. The set of orbitals above the LUMO shows partial delocalization (in an antibonding sense) to the metal fragment, thus accounting for the relative ease of the third reduction of this class of molecules compared to the third reduction of free C₆₀.     

Ligand-centred coupling of the alkynyl radical cations [Mo(CCR)(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)(η-C7H7)]+ (R = Ph or Bun: crystal structure of the dimeric product [Mo2(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)2(η-C7H7)2(μ-C4R2)][PF6]2 (R = Ph)

The radical cations [Mo(CCR)(dppe)(η-C₇H₇)]⁺ (R = Ph or Buⁿ); dppe = Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) undergo coupling at C_β of the alkynyl ligand to afford the divinylidene-bridged, dimeric products [Mo₂(dppe)₂(η-C₇H₇)₂(μ-C₄R₂)]²⁺, characterised crystallographically for R = Ph.     

ESR study of reactivity of the complex (η2-C60)Os(CO)(PPh3)2(CNBut) toward free radicals

Addition of the ^·P(O)(OPrⁱ)₂, Me^·, Et^·, ^·Bu^t, and Cl₃C^· radicals to the (ν²-C₆₀)Os(CO)-(PPh₃)₂(CNBu^t) complex (1) was studied by ESR spectroscopy. The spectral parameters of the spin-adducts of these radicals with complex 1 were determined. The predominant direction of the attack by the ^·P(O)(OPrⁱ)₂, ^·Bu^t, and Cl₃C^· radicals are the cis-1 and cis-2 bonds of the fullerene molecule. The stability of the spin-adducts depends substantially on the nature of the added radical. The addition rate constants of the ^·P(O)(OPrⁱ)₂, ^·But, and Cl₃C^· radicals to complex 1 and the dimerization rate constants for these spin-adducts were determined. Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 2, pp. 301–307, February, 2008.     

Triphospha-Ferrocenes as Ligands. Crystal Structures of [Fe(η5-C5Me5)(η5-C2 TBu2P3)M(CO)5)], (M= Cr,MO, W) and the Novel ruthenium and Nickel Complexes [Fe(η5-C5Me5) (η5-C2 TBu2P3)Ru3(CO)9] and [Fe(η5-C5Me5)(η5-C2 tBu2P3)Ni(Co)2]2

Abstract

Syntheses and structures of penta- and hexaphosphorus analogues of ferrocene have been described recently¹. Unlike their simple ferrocene analogues, these complexes have further ligating potential towards other transition metal centres by virtue of the availability of the ring phosphorus lone-pair electrons that are not involved in the η⁵-coordination. We now describe the first examples of coordination compounds of the triphospha-ferrocene [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅) (η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃]. In the ruthenium complex [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃) Ru₃(CO)₉] ² two adjacent phosphorus atoms of the η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃ ring are interlinked by a ruthenium carbonyl cluster in which all three ruthenium atoms interact with the phosphorus atoms. The tetrametallic nickel complex [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃)Ni(CO)₂]₂ ³ represents the first example of intermolecular interlinkage of two phospha-ferrocene systems by two metal centres.     

Crystal structure of twinned (η5-C5(CH3)4CF3) (η5-C5(CH3)5)Ru

The substituted sandwich complex crystallizes in monoclinic space groupP2₁/m withZ=2. Twinning to the (001) direction with the special conditionc ^*/4a ^* = cos ^* causes systematic superposition of the reciprocal lattices of both domains and results in an apparent unit cell with double volume and the reflection condition (2h)kl, l=2n. The structure solution was obtained with the subset of intensity data for the predominant individuum and converged atR = 0.040,R _w =0.046 for 832 independent observations and 122 variables. The molecules show disorder with respect to the crystallographic mirror plane. The structure is closely related to that of decamethylruthenocene.     

Homogeneous and Solid-Gas Hydrogenation of Alkynes in the Presence of the Clusters Fe3(CO)9(ε-RC2 R 1) {R=R 1=Ph, Et; R=Me, R 1=Ph}: Characterization of New Metallacyclic Derivatives

The clusters Fe₃(CO)₉(RC₂ R ¹) (R=R ¹=Ph, Et; R=Me, R ¹=Ph), complexes 1a, 1b, 1c, containing an alkyne bound in perpendicular fashion with respect to a cluster edge, catalyze the hydrogenation of some acetylenes either under homogeneous and solid–gas conditions. We hypothesize that cluster catalysis occurs and that the catalytic activity is related to the coordinating ability of the alkynic substrates. Competition between hydrogenation and formation of metallacyclic byproducts occurs. The new metallacyclic derivatives Fe₃(CO)₆(-CO)₂{(RC₂ R ¹)(R ²C₂ R ³)}, Fe₂(CO)₆{(RC₂ R ¹)(R ²C₂ R ³)} {R=R ¹=Et, R ²=R ³=H, Ph; R ²=Me, R ³=Et, Ph; R ²=H, R ³=Bu ^t . R=R ¹=Ph, R ²=Me, R ³=Et, Ph} (complexes 2, 3) were found both in the homogeneous reaction mixtures and after the solid–gas reactions. The formation of these products lowers the catalytic activity.     

Synthesis and structures of the η5-C5H5Cl(CO)2W-η1,η5-(PPh2)C5H4(CO)2Fe-η1,η5-C5H4Mn(CO)3 and MeSi[C5H4(CO)2Fe-η1,η5-C5H4Mn(CO)2PPh3]3 complexes

The metallation of the η⁵-C₅H₅(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ complex with BuⁿLi (THF, ?78 °C) followed by the treatment of the lithium derivative with Ph₂PCl afforded the η⁵-Ph₂PC₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ complex. The reaction of the latter with η⁵-C₅H₅(CO)₃WCl in the presence of Me₃NO produced the trinuclear complex η⁵-C₅H₅Cl(CO)₂W-η¹,η⁵-(Ph₂P)C₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃. The structure of the latter complex was established by IR, UV, and 1H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The reaction of MeSiCl₃ with three equivalents of LiC₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₂PPh₃ gave the hexanuclear complex MeSi[C₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₂PPh₃]₃.     

Synthesis of Co3(CO)7(μ-η3-Allyl)(μ3-X) Complexes (X=S, Se) and Structure of the Selenium Derivative

The complexes Co₃(CO)₉( ₃-X) (X=S, Se) can be reduced to the corresponding anionic species [Co₃(CO)₉( ₃-X)]^–, which react with allyl bromide to give Co₃(CO)₇(- ³-C₃H₅)( ₃-X) (X=S, Se). These are the first two cobalt complexes containing the bridging - ³-allyl ligand. The structure of the selenium complex was determined by X-ray crystallography. Crystal data for Co₃(CO)₇(- ³-C₃H₅)( ₃-Se) are as follows: space group P2₁/c, a=9.051(2) Å, b=8.102(2) Å, c=21.27(4) Å, =93.82(3)°, Z=4, and R=0.0565 for 2491 observed reflections.     

The Thermolysis of [Ru3(CO)12] in Cyclohexene: Synthesis and Charaterisation of the New Clusters [Ru3H2(CO)9(μ3-η1:η2:η1-C6H8)] and [Ru5(CO)12(μ4-η2-C6H8)(η4-C6H8)]

Thermolysis of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] in cyclohexene for 24 h affords the complexes [Ru(CO)₃(η⁴-C₆H₈)] (1), [Ru₃H₂(CO)₉(μ₂-η¹:η²:η¹-C₆H₈)] (2), [Ru₄(CO)₁₂(μ₄-C₆H₈)] (3) [Ru₄(CO)₉(μ₄-C₆H₈)(η⁶-C₆H₆)] (4a and 4b, two isomers) and [Ru₅(CO)₁₂(μ₄-η²-C₆H₈)(η⁴-C₆H₈)] (5), where 1, 3, 4a and 4b have been previously characterised as products of the thermolysis of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with cyclohexa-1,3-diene. The molecular structures of the new clusters 2 and 5 were determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, showing that two conformational polymorphs of 5 exist in the solid state, differing in the orientation of the cyclohexa-1,3-diene ligand on a ruthenium vertex.     

Reactions of transition metal acetylides: VI. Some addition reactions of substituted styrenes with Ru(C2R)(L)2(η-C5H5) (R = Me OR Ph; L2 = (CO,PPh3), (PPh3)2 OR (dppe)). X-ray crystal structure of Ru{C[C(CN)2]CPhCH(C6H4NO2-4)}(dppe)(η-C5H5) · 0.5CH2Cl2

Further studies of the reactions between ruthenium σ-acetylide complexes and electrophilic olefins CHArC(CN)(X) (Ar = C₆H₄NO₂-4, Ph; X = CN; Ar = C₆H₄NO₂-4, X = CO₂Et) have shown the formation of allylic, butadienyl, and in one case, cyclobutenyl complexes. The direction of addition is such that the =C(CN)(X) group becomes attached to the α-carbon of the acetylide. This is confirmed by the X-ray structure of Ru{C[C(CN)₂]CPhCH(C₆H₄NO₂-4)}(dppe)(η-C₅H₅) · 0.5CH₂Cl₂, cr with cell dimensions a 28.81(1), b 9.661(2), c 30.782(8) Å, β 95.02 (3)°, and Z = 8. The structure was refined by a least-squares procedure with the use of 4291 statistically significant reflections [I > 2.5σ(I)] to R 0.075 and R_w 0.076.     

富勒烯配合物η2-C60[Ru(NO)(PPh3)]2的合成与表征

从1985年Kroto等[1]发现富勒烯至今, 其在化学、材料和物理等领域已有较多的研究[2～8]. 目前有关C60取代的金属小分子配合物(如羰基、亚硝酰基等)的研究方兴未艾. 而以NO为配体的亚硝酰基金属富勒烯配合物仅有数例[2,3], Green等[3]在研究以CO和NO为配体的金属富勒烯系列化合物的合成中, 认为C60不能与Ru(NO)2(PPh3)2发生反应. 本文利用Ru(NO)2(PPh3)2与C60反应首次合成出η2-C60[Ru(NO)(PPh3)]2配合物, 并对其进行了表征.     

Protonation of Os3(μ-H)(CO)9(μ3-σ,η2-C≡C-R) clusters (R=CMe2OH,C(Me)=CH2)

Protonation of triosmium clusters Os₃(-H)(CO)₉(₃-,²-CC-R) (R=CMe₂OH, C(Me)=CH₂) affords a cationic complex containing a six-electron propargyl ligand which has been detected for the first time.Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 6, pp. 1144–1145, June, 1993.     

Optically active [(η-C5H5)Ru{(R)-Ph2PCH(CH3)CH2PPh2}(Olefin)]PF6 complexes: Influence of the stereogenic metal atom on the enantioface selection

The synthesis and characterization of optically active olefinic complexes of the type [(η-C₅H₅)Ru{Ph₂PCH(CH₃)CH₂PPh₂}(CH₂CHR″)]PF₆ (R″  H, CH₃, C₆H₅, COOCH₃), in which the metal is a stereogenic center, are reported. The enantioface discrimination of the prochiral olefin is influenced by the chiral ligand and by the stereogenic metal atom. The chiral center at the metal appears to be optically labile. The rates of the epimerization at the metal and of the olefin enantioface depend on the structure of the coordinated olefin.     

Ru3(CO)9(PPh3)3: a convenient starting material for the synthesis of binuclear ruthenium(I) complexes. Crystal structure of Ru2(μ-L2)(CO)4(PPh3)2 (H2L2 = 1,8-diaminonaphthalene)

The thermal reaction of Ru₃(CO)₉(PPh₃)₃ with precursors (HL) of binucleating anionic ligands affords the ruthenium(I) dimers Ru₂(μ-L)₂(CO)₄(PPh₃)₂ (3), t-butylmercaptane (4); H₂L₂ = 1,8-diaminonaphthalenene (5)]. The crystal structure of complex 5 shows that each nitrogen of the 1,8-diiminonaphthalene ligand bridges the two ruthenium atoms, leading to a vary distorted, octahedral arrangement of the ligands and a very short RuRu distance, 2.5788(3) Å.     

Stereo- and regio-specific CC bond formation via the coupling of electrophilic and nucleophilic organotransition-metal complexes: The x-ray crystal structure of [Ru(CO)2(PPh3)(η2,η3-C8H8R)][PF6]·0.5CH2Cl2 (R = CH2C(Me)CH2)

The coupling of [Ru(CO)₂L(η⁴-cot)] (L = CO or PPh₃, cot = cyclooctatetraene) with [Fe(CO)₃(η⁵-cyclohexadienyl)]⁺ or [Fe{P(OMe)₃}(NO)₂(η³-allyl)]⁺ yields respectively the dimetallic species [Ru(CO)₂L(η²,η³-C₈H₈{Fe(CO)₃(η⁴-C₆H₇)}] (3) and the allyl-substituted derivative [Ru(CO)₂L(η⁵-C₈H₈CH₂C(Me)CH₂)][PF₆] (5) whose X-ray structure is reported; paramagnetic [Co(η-C₅H₅)₂] and [Ru(CO)₃(η⁵-cyclohexadienyl)]⁺ give diamagnetic [Ru(CO)₃(η⁴-C₆H₇C₅H₆(o-C₅H₅)] (8) via CC bond formation and one-electron reduction.     

Cluster chemistry. 85. Addition of a gold acetylide to an Ru5 cluster. X-ray structure of AuRu5(μ5-C2PPh2)(μ-C2Ph)(μ-PPh2)(CO)13(PPh3)

The reaction between Ru₅(₅-C₂PPh₂)(-PPh₂)(CO)₁₃ and Au(C₂Ph)(PPh₃) afforded AuRu₅(₅-C₂PPh₂)(-C₂Ph)(-PPh₂)(CO)₁₃ (PPh₃), in which the Ru₅ cluster has a scorpion geometry; the Au(PPh₃) group bridges one of the Ru-Ru bonds of the Ru₃ triangle, while the C₂Ph group bridges one of the tail Ru-Ru vectors.For Part 84, see Ref. 1.     

Organometalloidal derivatives of the transition metals: XI. Synthesis and crystal structures of Ph3GeSiMe3 and Ph3GeSiMe2Fe(CO)2(η5-C5H5)

Ph₃GeSiMe₃ and Ph₃GeSiMe₂Fe(CO)₂(η⁵-C₅H₅) have been synthesized and their crystal structures determined. The GeSi bond in iron (2.405(2) Å) is longer by 0.021 Å than in the simple germylsilane (2.384(1) Å). The significant shortening of the SiFe bond (2.328(1) Å) in the iron complex compared to that in the analogous Ph₃SiSiMe₂Fe(CO)₂(η⁵-C₅H₅) (2.346(1) Å) and spectroscopic data indicate an enhanced SiFe interaction.