Reactions of dipropargyl manolate,terephthalate with Co2(CO)8, Mo2Cp2(CO)4 and RuCo2(CO)11 give the di or tetranuclear clusters. The crystal structure of [CH2(CO2CH2C2H-μ)2][Co2(CO)6]2 and [p-(HC2CH2OCO)C6H4(CO2CH2C2H-μ)][Co2(CO)6]

The reactions of dipropargyl manolate and terephthalate, respectively, with Co₂(CO)₈ in THF at room temperature gave four new compounds [R(CO₂CH₂C₂H-μ)₂][Co₂(CO)₆]₂ (R=CH₂, 1a; R=C₆H₄, 1b) and [(HC₂CH₂OCO)R(CO₂CH₂C₂H-μ)][Co₂(CO)₆] (R=CH₂, 2a; R=C₆H₄-1,4-, 2b), and compounds 2a and b reacted with RuCo₂(CO)₁₁ to form two new linked clusters [R(CO₂CH₂C₂H-μ)₂][Co₂(CO)₆][RuCo₂(CO)₉] (R=CH₂, 3a; R=C₆H₄-1,4-, 3b). The treatment of two dipropargyl esters, respectively, with RuCo₂(CO)₁₁ afforded another two new clusters [R(CO₂CH₂C₂H-μ)₂][RuCo₂(CO)₉]₂ (R=CH₂, 4a; R=C₆H₄-1,4-, 4b). The reactions of dipropargyl manolate, terephalate with Mo₂Cp₂(CO)₄ gave rise to the formation of dinuclear complexes [(HC₂CH₂OCO)R(CO₂CH₂C₂H-μ)][Mo₂Cp₂(CO)₄] (R=CH₂, 5a; R=C₆H₄-1,4-, 5b), compound 5a reacted with Co₂(CO)₈ to produce the cluster [CH₂(CO₂CH₂C₂H-μ)₂][Co₂(CO)₆][Mo₂Cp₂(CO)₄] 6a. All the new clusters have been characterized by C/H elemental analysis, IR and ¹H NMR spectroscopies. The structure of [CH₂(CO₂CH₂C₂H-μ)₂][Co₂(CO)₆]₂ 1a and [p-(HC₂CH₂OCO)C₆H₄(CO₂CH₂C₂H-μ)][Co₂(CO)₆] 2b have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction methods.     

Direct synthesis of acetals by rhodium catalysed hydroformylation of alkenes in the presence of orthoformate

The two catalyst precursors [Rh₂(μ-penicillamine)₂(CO)₄][OTf]₂ and [Rh₂(μ-cysteine)₂(CO)₄][OTf]₂ in the presence of 4 equivalents of P(OPh)₃ in triethyl orthoformate as solvent and reactant, permit the low pressure hydroformylation of various alkenes into the corresponding acetals. Apart from a few low-yield by-products resulting from isomerization of the substrates, the carbonylated products obtained directly and exclusively are acetals.     

Studies on the reactivity of the clusters [Ru3(CO)8(μ-H)2(μ-PR2)2] (R=But,Cy) towards phosphine ligands

The reaction behavior of the 48e-clusters [Ru₃(CO)₈(μ-H)₂(μ-PR₂)₂] (R=Bu^t, 1a; R=Cy, 1b) towards phosphine ligands has been studied. Whereas 1a reacts spontaneously with many phosphines at room temperature, a lack of reactivity for 1b under similar conditions is observed. Thus 1a reacts with dppm (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) to the known 46e-cluster [Ru₃(μ-CO)(CO)₄(μ₃-H)(μ-H)(μ-PBu^t₂)₂(μ-dppm)] (2a), and the reaction of 1a with dppe (Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh₂) yields analogously [Ru₃(μ-CO)(CO)₄(μ₃-H)(μ-H)(μ-PBu^t₂)₂(μ-dppe)] (3). Reactions of 1a with dmpm (Me₂PCH₂PMe₂), dmpe (Me₂PC₂H₄PMe₂) and PBuⁿ₃, respectively, gave in each case a mixture of products which could not be characterized. Contrary to the reaction behavior at room temperature, 1b reacts with phosphines in THF under reflux yielding the novel complexes [Ru₃(CO)₆(μ-H)₂(μ-PCy₂)₂L₂] (L=Cy₂PH, 4a; L=Bu^t₂PH, 4b; L=Ph₂PH, 4c; L=P(OEt)₃, 4d). 4a is also obtained directly by the reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with an excess of Cy₂PH. The molecular structure of 4a has been determined by a single-crystal X-ray analysis. Moreover, the thermolysis of 1a in octane affords [Ru₃(CO)₈(μ-H)₂(μ₃-PBu^t)(Bu^t₂PH)] (6) as the main product, and the thermolysis of [Ru₃(CO)₉(Bu^t₂PH)(μ-dppm)] (7) yields 2a to a considerable extent. Treatment of 1a with carbon tetrachloride leads to [Ru₃(CO)₇(μ-H)(μ-PBu^t₂)₂(μ-Cl)] (8) as the main product.     

Paramagnetic carbonyl cobalt(II) complexes. Molecular structure of bromocarbonyl-1,1,1-tris(diphenylphosphinomethyl)ethanecobalt(II) tetraphenylborate

Carbon monoxide or cyclohexyl isonitrile (L) react with the dinuclear five-coordinated derivatives of 1,1,1-tris(diphenylphosphinomethyl)ethane, (triphos), [(triphos)Co(μ-X)₂Co(triphos)](BPh₄)₂ (X = halide) to give complexes of formula [(triphos)Co(L)X]BPh₄. The latter are rare examples of paramagnetic cobalt(II) carbonyl complexes. The molecular structure of [(triphos)Co(CO)Br]BPh₄ has been determined from counter diffraction data. The crystals are monoclinic, space group P2₁/a with cell dimensions a 20.225(8), b 20.664(9), c 13.301(5); β 97.24(5)°, D_c = 1.338 g cm^?3 for Z = 4. Full-matrix least squares refinement led to the conventional R factor of 0.057 for 3648 observed reflections. The molecular structure consists of five-coordinate [(triphos)Co(CO)Br]⁺ cations of intermediate geometry and BPh^?₄ anions.     

Synthesis,Reactivity, and Fluxional Behaviour of [Ir2Rh2(CO)12], and Crystal Structure of [Ir2Rh2(CO)8(norbornadiene)2]

The synthesis of [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₁₂] ( 1 ) by the literature method gives a mixture 1 /[IrRh₃(CO)₁₂] which cannot be separated using chromatography. The reaction of [Ir(CO)₄]^? with 1 mol-equiv. of [Rh(CO)₂(THF)₂]⁺ in THF gives pure 1 in 61% yield. Crystals of 1 are highly disordered, unlike those of its derivative [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₅(μ₂-CO)₃(norbornadiene)₂] which were analysed using X-ray diffraction. The ground-state geometry of 1 in solution has three edge-bridging CO's on the basal IrRh₂ face of the metal tetrahedron. Time averaging of CO's takes place above 230 K. The CO site exchange of lowest activation energy is due to one synchronous change of basal face, as shown by 2D- and VT-¹³C-NMR. Substitution of CO by X^? in 1 takes place at a Rh-atom giving [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₈(μ₂-CO)₃X]^? (X = Br, I). Substitution by bidentate ligands gives [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₇(μ₂-CO)₃(η⁴-L)] (L = norbornadiene, cycloocta-1,5-diene) where the ligand L is chelating a Rh-atom of the basal IrRh₂ face. Carbonyl substitution by tridentate ligands gives [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₆(μ₂-CO)₃(μ₃-L)] (L = 1,3,5-trithiane, tripod) with L capping the triangular basal face of the metal tetrahedron. Carbonyl scrambling is also observed in these substituted derivatives of 1 and is mainly due to the rotation of three terminal CO's about a local C₃ axis on the apical Ir-atom.     

Coordination properties of N2S (1,5-bis(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)-3-thiapentane) or N2S2 (1,8-bis(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)-3,6-dithiaoctane or 1,2-bis[3-(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)-2-thiapropyl]benzene) donor ligands toward Rh(I)

The 1,5-bis(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)-3-thiapentane ligand (bdtp) reacts with [Rh(COD)(THF)₂][BF₄] to give [Rh(COD)(bdtp)][BF₄] ([1][BF₄]), which is fluxional in solution on the NMR time scale. Its further treatment with carbon monoxide leads to a displacement of the 1,5-cyclooctadiene ligand, generating a mixture of two complexes, namely, [Rh(CO)₂(bdtp)][BF₄] ([2][BF₄]) and [Rh(CO)(bdtp-κ³N,N,S)][BF₄] ([3][BF₄]). In solution, [2][BF₄] exists as a mixture of two isomers, [Rh(CO)₂(bdtp-κ²N,N)]⁺ ([2a]⁺) and [Rh(CO)₂(bdtp-κ³N,N,S)]⁺ ([2b]⁺; major isomer) rapidly interconverting on the NMR time scale. At room temperature, [2][BF₄] easily loses one molecule of carbon monoxide to give [3][BF₄]. The latter is prone to react with carbon monoxide to partially regenerate [2][BF₄]. The ligands 1,2-bis[3-(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)-2-thiapropyl]benzene (bddf) and 1,8-bis(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)-3,6-dithiaoctane (bddo) are seen to react with two equivalents of [Rh(COD)(THF)₂][BF₄] to give the dinuclear complexes [Rh₂(bddf)(COD)₂][BF₄]₂ ([4][BF₄]₂) and [Rh₂(bddo)(COD)₂][BF₄]₂ ([5][BF₄]₂), respectively. In such complexes, the ligand acts as a double pincer holding two rhodium atoms through a chelation involving S and N donor atoms. Bubbling carbon monoxide into a solution of [4][BF₄]₂ results in loss of the COD ligand and carbonylation to give [Rh₂(bddf)(CO)₄][BF₄]₂ ([6][BF₄]₂). The single-crystal X-ray structures of [3][CF₃SO₃], [5][BF₄]₂ and [6][BF₄]₂ are reported.     

Ligating properties of thionitrosoamines: III. Carbonyl complexes of rhodium(I) and rhodium(III) containing N-thionitrosodimethylamine

Me₂NNS reacts with [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂ to produce the complex cis-Rh(SNNMe₂)(CO)₂Cl (1). The latter undergoes reversible CO substitution by Me₂NNS to give the complex trans-Rh(SNNMe₂)₂(CO)Cl (2a). Complexes 1 and 2a, in solution lose CO and Me₂NSS, respectively, to give the complex trans-(μ-Cl)₂[Rh(SNNMe₂)(CO)]₂ (3). Complex 1 can also be prepared by bubbling CO through a CH₂Cl₂ solution of Rh(SNNMe₂)(diene)Cl (diene = 1,5-cyclooctadiene (4a), norbornadiene (4b)) obtained by a bridge-splitting reaction of Me₂NNS with [Rh(diene)Cl]₂. 1 and 2a react with EPh₃ (E = P, As, Sb) to give the complexes trans-Rh(EPh₃)₂(CO)Cl. The complexes trans-Rh(E′Ph₃)₂(CO)X (X = Cl, E′ = As, Sb; X = Br, NCS, E′ = As) undergo reversible E′Ph₃ displacement upon treatment with Me₂NNS to give the complexes trans-Rh(SNNMe₂)₂(CO)X (X = Cl (2a), Br (2b), NCS (2c)). Oxidative additions of Br₂, I₂, or HgCl₂ to 2a produce stable adducts, while the reaction of 2a with CH₃I gives an inseparable mixture of the adduct Rh(SNNMe₂)₂(CO)(CH₃)ClI and the acetyl derivative Rh(SNNMe₂)₂(CH₃CO)ClI. A mixture of the acetyl derivative (μ-Cl)₂[Rh(SNNMe₂)(CH₃CO)I]₂ and the adduct (μ-Cl)₂[Rh(SNNMe₂)(CO)(CH₃)I]₂ is obtained by treating 1 with CH₃I. The IR spectra of all the compounds are consistent with S-coordination of Me₂NNS. Because of the restricted rotation around the NN bond, the ¹H NMR spectra of the new compounds exhibit two quadruplets in the range 3.5–4.3δ when ⁴J(HH) = 0.7–0.5 Hz. When ⁴J(HH) < 0.5 Hz, the perturbing effect of the quadrupolar relaxation of the ¹⁴N nucleus obscures the spin-spin coupling and two broad signals are observed in the range 3.6–4δ.     

Electrochemical oxidative addition of chloride to Rh2(μ-dppm)2(CO)2Cl2

The electrochemical oxidation of trans-Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(CO)₂Cl₂ (dppm = bis (diphenylphosphino)methane) in the presence of chloride has afforded the new dirhodium(II) unsymmetrical complex Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)(CO)Cl₃ which is readily converted to the complex [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Co)(μ-Cl)Cl₂]PF₆. This species has been shown to undergo addition reactions with chloride to regenerate [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)Cl₃(CO)], and with carbon monoxide and t-butylisocyanide to give the additional new dirhodium(II) complexes [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)Cl₂(CO)₂]PF₆ and [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)(CNC(CH₃)₃)₂Cl₂]PF₆, respectively. During prolonged exposure to carbon monoxide [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Co)(μ-Cl)Cl₂]PF₆ undergoes reduction with the loss of chloride to give [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)(CO)₂]PF₆.     

Olefin-aminocarbyne coupling in diiron complexes: Synthesis of new bridging aminoallylidene complexes

The bridging aminocarbyne complexes [Fe₂{μ-CN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)₂(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R = Me, 1a; Xyl, 1b; 4-C₆H₄OMe, 1c; Xyl = 2,6-Me₂C₆ H₃) react with acrylonitrile or methyl acrylate, in the presence of Me₃NO and NaH, to give the corresponding μ-allylidene complexes [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³- C_α(N(Me)(R))C_β(H)C_γ(H)(R′)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂] (R = Me, R′ = CN, 3a; R = Xyl, R′ = CN, 3b; R = 4-C₆H₄OMe, R′ = CN, 3c; R = Me, R′ = CO₂Me, 3d; R = 4-C₆H₄OMe, R′ = CO₂Me, 3e). Likewise, 1a reacts with styrene or diethyl maleate, under the same reaction conditions, affording the complexes [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(NMe₂)C_β(R′)C_γ(H)(R″)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂] (R′ = H, R″ = C₆H₅, 3f; R′ = R″ = CO₂Et, 3g). The corresponding reactions of [Ru₂{μ-CN(Me)(CH₂Ph)}(μ-CO)(CO)₂(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (1d) with acrylonitrile or methyl acrylate afford the complexes [Ru₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(N(Me)(CH₂Ph))C_β(H)C_γ(H)(R′)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂] (R′ = CN, 3h; CO₂Me, 3i), respectively.The coupling reaction of olefin with the carbyne carbon is regio- and stereospecific, leading to the formation of only one isomer. C-C bond formation occurs selectively between the less substituted alkene carbon and the aminocarbyne, and the C_β-H, C_γ-H hydrogen atoms are mutually trans.The reactions with acrylonitrile, leading to 3a-c and 3h involve, as intermediate species, the nitrile complexes [M₂{μ-CN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(NC-CHCH₂)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (M = Fe, R = Me, 4a; M = Fe, R = Xyl, 4b; M = Fe, R = 4-C₆H₄OMe, 4c; M = Ru, R = CH₂C₆H₅, 4d).Compounds 3a, 3d and 3f undergo methylation (by CH₃SO₃CF₃) and protonation (by HSO₃CF₃) at the nitrogen atom, leading to the formation of the cationic complexes [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(N(Me)₃)C_β(H)C_γ(H)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R = CN, 5a; R = CO₂Me, 5b; R = C₆H₅, 5c) and [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(N(H)(Me)₂)C_β(H)C_γ(H)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R = CN, 6a; R = CO₂Me, 6b; R = C₆H₅, 6c), respectively.Complex 3a, adds the fragment [Fe(CO)₂(THF)(Cp)]⁺, through the nitrile functionality of the bridging ligand, leading to the formation of the complex [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(NMe₂)C_β(H)C_γ(H)(CNFe(CO)₂Cp)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (9).In an analogous reaction, 3a and [Fe₂{μ-CN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)₂(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃], in the presence of Me₃NO, are assembled to give the tetrameric species [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(NMe₂)C_β(H)C_γ(H)(CN[Fe₂{μ- CN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂])}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R = Me, 10a; R = Xyl, 10b; R = 4-C₆H₄OMe, 10c).The molecular structures of 3a and 3b have been determined by X-ray diffraction studies.     

Cationic ruthenium and osmium systems: V. Cationic osmium(II) hydrazine and hydrazone complexes derived from the polymer [OsCl2(COD)]x (COD = cyclo-octa-1,5-diene; x > 2). The crystal structure of [Os(COD(CNBut)2(NH2H:CMe2)2][BPh4]2·(acetone)2

The polymer [OsCl₂(COD)]_x (1; COD = cycloocta-1,5-diene; x > 2) and the appropriate hydrazine have been used to prepare the salts [OsCl(COD)(N₂H₄)₃]BPh₄ (2), [Os(COD)(N₂H₄)₄][BPh₄]₂ (3) and [OsCl(COD)(NH₂NMe₂)₃]PF₆ (4). Treatment of 3 with t-butyl isocyanide produced mer-[Os(CNBu^t)₃(N₂H₄)₃][BPh₄]₂ (5) and trans-[Os(CNBu^t)₄(N₂H₄)₂][BPh₄]₂ (6) from refluxing ethanol and the hydrazone complex [Os(COD)(CNBu^t)₂(NH₂N:CMe₂)₂][BPh₄]₂ (7) from refluxing acetone. Reactions of 3 and L {L = CNxylyl, P(OMe)₃, and P(OMe)₃Ph; xylyl = 2,6-dimethylphenyl} in acetone gave trans-[Os(NH₂N:CMe₂)₂L₄][BPh₄]₂ (8). The crystal structure of [Os(COD)(CNBu^t)₂(NH₂N:CMe₂)₂][BPh₄]₂·(Acetone)₂ (7) has been determined from three-dimensional X-ray counter data and refined to a final R (on F) of 0.090 based on 3014 reflections. The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with four formula units in a cell of dimensions a 24.60(2), b 13.31(1), c 24.12(2) Å and β 111.51(2)°. The cation has a crystallographically imposed C₂ symmetry, with octahedral coordination of the osmium atom, assuming that the COD ligand occupies two adjacent coordination sites. Coordination of the mutually trans hydrazone ligands to the osmium atom is through the amino-N atoms rather than through the less basic, more sterically hindered, imino-N atoms. relevant bond distances are: Os-N 2.19(2) (mean), Os-C(COD) 2.19(2) and 2.29(2), and Os-C(isocyanide) 1.93(2) (mean) Å.     

Reaction of [M(CO)4] (M = Ir, Rh) with cyclopropenyl tetrafluoroborate - Ring opening and coupling of cyclopropenyl ligands to form dinuclear metal complexes

Reaction of the iridium tetracarbonylate [PPN][Ir(CO)₄] (1a) with triphenylcyclopropenyl tetrafluoroborate [C₃Ph₃][BF₄] afforded two dinuclear species Ir₂(CO)₄(μ,η¹:η²-C₃Ph₃)(μ,η²:η³-C₃Ph₃) (2) and Ir₂(CO)₄(μ,η⁴:η⁴-C₆Ph₆) (3a) resulting from the ring opening and in the latter case, coupling of the resulting acyclic, propenyl ligands. The analogous reaction with [PPN][Rh(CO)₄] (1b) afforded only the rhodium analogue for 3a.     

μ-Amido complexes of ruthenium carbonyl. Asymmetric versus symmetric bridging preference of the monodeprotonated derivatives of 1,2-arenediamines. Crystal structure of [Ru3(μ-H)(μ-H3N2-4,5-Me2-1,2-phenylene)]

[Ru₃(CO)₁₂] reacts with 1,2-arenediamines (H₄N₂arene), under CO, to give the very asymmetric clusters [Ru₃(μ-H)(μ-H₃N₂arene)(CO)₉] (arene = 1,2-phenylene (1a) or 4,5-Me₂-1,2-phenylene (1b)) in which the three Ru atoms bear two, three, and four CO ligands, respectively. Under similar conditions, reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with 1,8-diaminonaphthalene (H₄N₂naph) leads to break up of the cluster framework to give the binuclear ruthenium(I) compound [Ru₂(μ-H₂N₂naph)(CO)₆] (3). The crystal structure of compound 1b has been determined by an X-ray diffraction study.     

Fragmentation reactions ofN-sulfinylaniline PhNSO by the dinuclear complex [Fe2(CO)7{μ-C(R)C(NEt2)}]: Nitrene and sulfur insertions into iron carbene bonds. Synthesis and x-ray structures of [Fe2(CO)6{μ-N(Ph)C(NEt2)C(Me)S}] [Fe2(CO)6{μ-N(Ph)C(NEt2)C(Ph)S}] · 0.5C6H14 and [Fe2(CO)6{μ-C(C3H5)C(NEt2)N(Ph)SO}] · 0.5CH2Cl2

The diiron ynamine complexes [Fe₂(CO)₇{μ-C(R)C(NEt₂)}] (1) (R=Me, Ph, C₃H₅, SiMe₃) react with theN-sulfinylaniline, PhNSO, in refluxing hexane to yield the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₆{μ-N(Ph)C(Me)S}] (2), [Fe₂(CO)₆{μ-N(Ph)C(NEt₂)C(Ph)S}] · 0.5C₆H₁₂ (3), [Fe₂(CO)₆{μ-C(C₃H₅)C(NEt₂)N(Ph)SO}] · 0.5CH₂Cl₂ (4), and [Fe₂(CO)₆{μ-C(SiMe₃)C(NEt₂)S)}] (5). Compound 5 was found to be identical to the previously reported product obtained from the reaction of 1 with sulfur. Compounds 2, 3, and 4 were characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. Crystal data: for 2: space group = P2₁/n,a=9.533(1) Å,b=18.830(4) Å,c=12.705(4) Å, β=107.01(2)°,Z=4, 2687 reflections,R=0.027; for 3: space group=P2₁/n,a=13.660(2) Å,b=19.096(8) Å,c=10.972(2) Å, β=90.62(1)°,Z=4, 2821 reflections,R=0.036; for 4: space group=P2₁/a,a=18.098(5) Å,b=16.564(4) Å,c=18.548(2) Å, β=115.44(2)°,Z=4, 3569 reflections,R=0.041. Complexes 2 and 3 result from fragmentation of theN-sulfinylaniline ligand and insertion of the nitrene grouping into the Fe=C(aminocarbene) bond, whereas the sulfur atom inserts into one Fe-C bond of the bridging carbene. Compound 4 is formed by insertion of the entireN-sulfinyl aniline ligand into the Fe=C(aminocarbene) bond. All three complexes have basket-like arachno structure isolobal to the benzvalene one.     

Rhodium- and iridium-manganese carbonyl complexes containing bridging Ph2PCH2PPh2 ligands

Treatment of mer,cis-[MnCl(CO)₂(dppm-PP′)(dppm-P)] with [Rh₂Cl₂(CO)₄] in the presence of CO and PF₆⁻ gives [Cl(OC)₂Mn(μ-dppm)₂Rh(CO)₂]PF₆ which might have a bridging chloride ligand. Similar treatment of mer,cis-[MnBr(CO)₂(dppm-PP')(dppm-P)] gave [Br(OC)₂Mn(μ-dppm)₂Rh(CO)₂]PF₆ which ³¹P-{¹H} NMR spectroscopy showed to be a mixture of two closely related species. Treatment of mer,cis-[MnCl(CO)₂(dppm-PP') (dppm-P)] with [Rh₂Cl₂(CO)₄] at −30°C probably gave [Cl(OC)₂Mn(μ-dppm)₂ Rh(CO)₂]Cl but this decomposes above 0°C: the corresponding dibromide was made similarly and is somewhat more stable than the dichloride. Treatment of mer,cis-[MnX(CO)₂(dppm-PP')(dppm-P)] (X = Cl or Br) with [IrCl(CO)₂(p-toluidine)] and CO-PF₆⁻ gave [X(OC)₂Mn(μ-dppm)₂Ir(CO)₂]PF₆. Neutral complexes of type [X(OC)₂Mn (μ-dppm)₂Ir(CO)X'] (X and X' = Cl or Br) are very labile and rapidly decompose to give [Ir(CO)(dppm-PP')₂]⁺ and other (unidentified) products. Treatment of mer,cis-[MnX-(CO)₂(dppm-PP')(dppm-P)] with [RhH(CO)(PPh₃)₃] gave [X(OC)Mn(μ-dppm)₂(μ-H)(μ-CO)Rh(CO)] (X = Cl or Br). These heterobimetallic compounds generally showed broad ¹³P-{¹H} resonances for the P nuclei bonded to Mn at ca 20°C due to some coupling with the ⁵⁵Mn nucleus (I = 100% abundant), but at −30°C these resonances sharpened up due to more rapid quadrupolar relaxation at the lower temperature. NMR and IR data are given.     

The reactions of [Fe2(η-C5H5)2(CO)4−n(CNMe)n] (n = 0–4) complexes with halogens and mercury(II) salts

Halogens, X₂, and HgY₂ (X = Cl, Br, I; Y = X, F, NO₃, BF₄) cleave the metalmetal bonds in [Fe₂(η-C₅H₅)₂(CO)_4−n(CNMe)_n] complexes (n = 0–4). Typically, e.g., when n = 2, X₂ electrophiles give [Fe(η-C₅H₅)(CO)(CNMe)X] (a) and [Fe(η-C₅H₅)(CO)(CNMe)₂]X (b) in relative yields which depend on X, the reaction solvent and n, but HgY₂ give equimolar amounts of [Fe(η-C₅H₅)(CNMe)₂Y] (c and [Fe(η-C₅H₅)(CO)₂HgY] only. Hg(CN)₂ reacts more slowly than other HgY₂, and [Hg(PPh₃)₂I₂] does not react at all. It is suggested that the reactions which give rise to products of type (a), (b) or (c) are all two-electron oxidation which proceed by way of adducts containing μ-CA → X₂ or μ-CA → HgX₂ groups (Ca = CO or CNMe). One of these adducts has been isolated, namely [Fe₂(η-C₅H₅)₂(CNMe)₂{μ-CN(Me)HgCl₂}₂] · CHCl₃.     

First Examples of Electrophilic Addition to a Fe2Q Face of [Fe3(μ3-Q)(CO)9]2− (Q=Se, Te)—Synthesis and Characterisation of [MFe3(μ4-Q)(CO)9Cp*] and [IrFe2(μ3-Q)(CO)7Cp*] (M=Rh, Ir; Cp*=η5-C5(CH3)5)

The reaction of [Et₄N]₂[Fe₃(μ ₃-Q)(CO)₉] (Q=Se ([Et₄N]₂[1b]), Te ([Et₄N]₂[1c])) with [Cp*M(CH₃CN)₃][CF₃SO₃]₂ (M=Rh, Ir) leads to the addition of a Cp*M²⁺ unit to a Fe₂Q face of the initial cluster. In this way four new heteronuclear clusters [MFe₃(μ ₄-Q)(CO)₉Cp*] (M=Rh (2b, c); M=Ir (3b, c)) were obtained possessing a butterfly-shaped cluster core bridged by a μ ₄-Q unit. Furthermore, reaction with the Ir starting complex leads to the metal-substituted derivatives [IrFe₂(μ ₃-Q)(CO)₇Cp*] (4b, c) in lower yields, whose structures consist of a triangular metal core capped by a μ ₃-Q ligand. The products were comprehensively characterised by spectroscopic methods and the molecular structures of 2b, 3c, and 4c were established by single crystal X-ray diffraction measurements.     

The preparation of a series of ring-linked derivatives of [Fe2(η-C5H5)2(CO)2(μ-CO)2] starting from [Fe2η5,η5-C5H4CH(NMe3)CH(NMe2)C5H4}(CO)2(μ-CO)2]+ salts

The salts [Fe₂η⁵,η⁵-C₅H₄CH{NMe₃)CH(NMe₂)C₅H₄}(CO)₂(μ-CO)₂][X] (X = I or SO₃CF₃) are the synthetic precursors to a wide range of [Fe₂(η-C₅H₅)₂(CO)₂(μ-CO)₂] derivatives in which the two cyclopentadienyl ligands are joined by a two-carbon bridge.     

A new route to iron(0) thiocarbonyl complex involving desulphurization of the Fe(η2-CS2R)+ cation with P-n-Bu3. Crystal structure of Fe(CS)(CO)2(PPh3)2

Reaction of [Fe(η²-CS₂R)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂][X] (R = CH₃, CH₂Ph; X⁻ = PF₆⁻, I⁻) with P-n-Bu₃ or PEt₃ gives Fe(CS)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ (3a); (ν(CS) 1235 cm⁻¹; δ(¹³C) 324.28 ppm). The structure of 3a has been determined by X-ray diffraction. Crystal data are: a 18.821(5), b 12.113(3), c 18.149(5) Å, β 117.76(6)°, monoclinic, space group P2₁, Z = 4. The structure is a trigonal-bypyramid with equatorial CS group, trans PPh₃ ligands, a FeC(S) bond distance of 1.768(8) and a CS bond distance of 1.563(8) Å.     

C-C bond formation through olefin-thiocarbyne coupling in diiron complexes

The bridging diiron thiocarbyne complex [Fe₂{μ-CS(Me)}(μ-CO)(CO)₂(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (1) reacts with activated olefins (methyl acrylate, acrylonitrile, styrene, diethyl maleate), in the presence of Me₃NO and NaH, to give the corresponding μ-allylidene complexes [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(SMe)C_β(R′)C_γ(H)(R″)} (μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂] (R″ = CO₂Me, R′ = H, 3a; R″ = CN, R′ = H, 3b; R″ = C₆H₅, R′ = H, 3c; R″ = R′ = CO₂Et, 3d). The coupling reaction of olefin with thiocarbyne is regio- and stereospecific, leading to the formation of only one isomer. C-C bond formation occurs between the less substituted alkene carbon and the thiocarbyne. Moreover, olefinic hydrogens of the bridging ligands are mutually trans.The reactions of 3a-b with MeSO₃CF₃ result, selectively, in the formation of the cationic μ-sulphonium allylidene complexes [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(SMe₂)C_β (H)C_γ(H)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R = CO₂Me, 4a; R = CN, 4b). Compound 4a undergoes displacement of the SMe₂ group by nucleophiles such as NaBH₄, NBu₄CN and NaOMe, affording the complexes [Fe₂{μ-η¹:η³-C_α(R)C_β (H)C_γ(H)(CO₂Me)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂] (R = H, 5a; R = CN, 5b; R = OMe, 5c), respectively. The molecular structures of 3a and 5a have been determined by X-ray diffraction studies.     

Activation of the carbon—nitrogen triple bond of benzonitrile in the presence of triosmium clusters and acetic acid. Crystal structure of (μ-H)Os3(CO)10(μ-O2CCH3), a product of the reaction

The activation of the CN triple bond of benzonitrile in the presence of acetic acid and of Os₃(CO)₁₂ or H₂Os₃(CO)₁₀ has been studied. When Os₃(CO)₁₂ reacts with PhCN and acetic acid in refluxing n-octane the three main products are (μ-H)Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ-O₂CCH₃) (I), (μ-H)Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ-NCHPh) (II) and (μ-H)Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ-NHCH₂Ph) (III); II and III are analogues of (μ-H)Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ-NCHPh) and (μ-H)Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ-NHCH₂Ph) obtained from PhCN, Ru₃(CO)₁₂ or H₄Ru₄(CO)]₁₂, and acetic acid. In contrast to the reaction with ruthenium clusters, Os₃(CO)₁₂ and H₂Os₃(CO)₁₀ also give the adduct Os₃(CO)₁₀(CH₃COOH) (I). The structure of I has been fully elucidated by X-ray diffraction. Crystals of I are monoclinic, space group P2₁/m, with unit cell parameters a 7.858(6), b 12.542(8), c 9.867(6) Å, β 109.92(2)°, Z = 2. In I an edge of the triangular cluster of osmium atoms is doubly bridged by a hydride and an acetate ligand. Ten terminal carbonyl groups are bonded to the metal atoms.