Total restrained bondage in graphs

A subset S of vertices of a graph G with no isolated vertex is a total restrained dominating set if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S and every vertex in V (G) S is also adjacent to a vertex in V (G) S. The total restrained domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a total restrained dominating set of G. In this paper we initiate the study of total restrained bondage in graphs. The total restrained bondage number in a graph G with no isolated vertex, is the minimum cardinality of a subset of edges E such that G E has no isolated vertex and the total restrained domination number of G E is greater than the total restrained domination number of G. We obtain several properties, exact values and bounds for the total restrained bondage number of a graph.     

Maker–Breaker domination game

We introduce the Maker–Breaker domination game, a two player game on a graph. At his turn, the first player, Dominator, selects a vertex in order to dominate the graph while the other player, Staller, forbids a vertex to Dominator in order to prevent him to reach his goal. Both players play alternately without missing their turn. This game is a particular instance of the so-called Maker–Breaker games, that is studied here in a combinatorial context. In this paper, we first prove that deciding the winner of the Maker–Breaker domination game is pspace-complete, even for bipartite graphs and split graphs. It is then showed that the problem is polynomial for cographs and trees. In particular, we define a strategy for Dominator that is derived from a variation of the dominating set problem, called the pairing dominating set problem.     

Limited packings in graphs

We define a k-limited packing in a graph, which generalizes a 2-packing in a graph, and give several bounds on the size of a k-limited packing. One such bound involves the domination number of the graph, and here we show all trees attaining the bound can be built via a simple sequence of operations. We consider graphs where every maximal 2-limited packing is a maximum 2-limited packing, and characterize their structure in a number of cases.     

On domination and reinforcement numbers in trees

The reinforcement number of a graph is the smallest number of edges that have to be added to a graph to reduce the domination number. We introduce the k-reinforcement number of a graph as the smallest number of edges that have to be added to a graph to reduce the domination number by k. We present an O(k²n) dynamic programming algorithm for computing the maximum number of vertices that can be dominated using γ(G)-k dominators for trees. A corollary of this is a linear-time algorithm for computing the k-reinforcement number of a tree. We also discuss extensions and related problems.     

Total domination dot-stable graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. Two vertices of G are said to be dotted (identified) if they are combined to form one vertex whose open neighborhood is the union of their neighborhoods minus themselves. We note that dotting any pair of vertices cannot increase the total domination number. Further we show it can decrease the total domination number by at most 2. A graph is total domination dot-stable if dotting any pair of adjacent vertices leaves the total domination number unchanged. We characterize the total domination dot-stable graphs and give a sharp upper bound on their total domination number. We also characterize the graphs attaining this bound.     

Domination dot-critical graphs

A graph G is dot-critical if contracting any edge decreases the domination number. It is totally dot-critical if identifying any two vertices decreases the domination number. We show that the totally dot-critical graphs essentially include the much-studied domination vertex-critical and edge-critical graphs as special cases. We investigate these properties, and provide a characterization of dot-critical and totally dot-critical graphs with domination number 2. We also consider the question of when a dot-critical graph contains a critical vertex.     

Domination dot-critical graphs with no critical vertices

A graph G is dot-critical if contracting any edge decreases the domination number. It is totally dot-critical if identifying any two vertices decreases the domination number. Burton and Sumner [Discrete Math. 306 (2006) 11-18] posed the problem: Is it true that for k?4, there exists a totally k-dot-critical graph with no critical vertices? In this paper, we show that this problem has a positive answer.     

On the diameter of a domination dot-critical graph

A graph G is domination dot-critical, or just dot-critical, if contracting any edge decreases the domination number. It is totally dot-critical if identifying any two vertices decreases the domination number. In this paper, we study an open question concerning of the diameter of a domination dot-critical graph G.     

A note on the independent domination number in graphs

We obtain an upper bound for the independent domination number of a graph in terms of the domination number and maximum degree.     

Domination in bipartite graphs

We prove that the domination number of a graph of order n and minimum degree at least 2 that does not contain cycles of length 4, 5, 7, 10 or 13 is at most . Furthermore, we derive upper bounds on the domination number of bipartite graphs of given minimum degree.     

Two Bounds for the Domination Number of a Graph

Upper and lower bounds are obtained for the domination numberof a graph, by means of a lemma involving the concept of a minimumdominating set of vertices. Although these results are obtainedexplicitly for graphs, there are analogous results in the theoryof directed graphs.     

关于图的强符号全控制数

图的强符号全控制数有着许多重要的应用背景,因而确定其下界有重要的意义.本文提出了图的强符号全控制数的概念,在构造适当点集的基础上对其进行了研究,给出了：（1）一般图的强符号全控制数的5个独立可达的下界及达到其界值的图;（2）确定了圈、轮图、完全图、完全二部图的强符号全控制数的值.     

A generalization of Gale's lemma

In this work, we present a generalization of Gale's lemma. Using this generalization, we introduce two sharp combinatorial lower bounds for and , the two classic topological lower bounds for the chromatic number of a graph G.     

A note on dominating sets and average distance

We show that the total domination number of a simple connected graph is greater than the average distance of the graph minus one-half, and that this inequality is best possible. In addition, we show that the domination number of the graph is greater than two-thirds of the average distance minus one-third, and that this inequality is best possible. Although the latter inequality is a corollary to a result of P. Dankelmann, we present a short and direct proof.     

Domination Defect in Graphs: Guarding With Fewer Guards

In this paper, we introduce a new graph parameter called the domination defect of a graph. The domination number γ of a graph G is the minimum number of vertices required to dominate the vertices of G. Due to the minimality of γ, if a set of vertices of G has cardinality less than γ then there are vertices of G that are not dominated by that set. The k-domination defect of G is the minimum number of vertices which are left un-dominated by a subset of γ - k vertices of G. We study different bounds on the k-domination defect of a graph G with respect to the domination number, order, degree sequence, graph homomorphisms and the existence of efficient dominating sets. We also characterize the graphs whose domination defect is 1 and find exact values of the domination defect for some particular classes of graphs.     

The exact domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if every vertex u∈V−S is dominated by some vertex v∈S. The domination number, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. For the generalized Petersen graph G(n), Behzad et al. [A. Behzad, M. Behzad, C.E. Praeger, On the domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs, Discrete Mathematics 308 (2008) 603-610] proved that and conjectured that the upper bound is the exact domination number. In this paper we prove this conjecture.     

Characterizations of trees with equal paired and double domination numbers

A paired-dominating set of a graph G is a dominating set of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching, and a double dominating set is a dominating set that dominates every vertex of G at least twice. We show that for trees, the paired-domination number is less than or equal to the double domination number, solving a conjecture of Chellali and Haynes. Then we characterize the trees having equal paired and double domination numbers.     

Every 3-connected claw-free graph with domination number at most 3 is hamiltonian-connected

We prove that every 3-connected claw-free graph with domination number at most 3 is hamiltonian-connected. The result is sharp and it is inspired by a conjecture posed by Zheng, Broersma, Wang and Zhang in 2020.     

On the domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs

Graph domination numbers and algorithms for finding them have been investigated for numerous classes of graphs, usually for graphs that have some kind of tree-like structure. By contrast, we study an infinite family of regular graphs, the generalized Petersen graphs G(n). We give two procedures that between them produce both upper and lower bounds for the (ordinary) domination number of G(n), and we conjecture that our upper bound ⌈3n/5⌉ is the exact domination number. To our knowledge this is one of the first classes of regular graphs for which such a procedure has been used to estimate the domination number.