First Dinuclear Copper/Gallium Complexes: Supporting Cu0 and CuI Centres by Low‐Valent Organogallium Ligands

The synthesis and structural characterisation of low‐valent dinuclear copper(I) and copper(0) complexes supported by organogallium ligands has been accomplished for the first time by the reductive coordination reaction of [GaCp*] (Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) and [Ga(ddp)] (ddp=HC(CMeNC₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂)₂ 2‐diisopropylphenylamino‐4‐diisopropylphenylimino‐2‐pentene) with readily available copper(II) and copper(I) precursors. The treatment of CuBr₂ and Cu(OTf)₂ (OTf=CF₃SO₃) with [Ga(ddp)] under mild conditions resulted in elimination of [Ga(L)₂(ddp)] (L=Br, OTf) and afforded the novel gallium(I)/copper(I) compounds [{(ddp)GaCu(L)}₂] (L=Br ( 1 ), OTf ( 2 )). The single‐crystal X‐ray structure determinations of 1 and 2 reveal that these molecules are composed of {(ddp)GaCu(L)} dimeric units, with planar Cu^I? Ga^I four‐membered rings and short Cu^I???Cu^I distances, with 2 exhibiting the shortest Cu^I???Cu^I contact reported to date of 2.277(3) Å. The all‐gallium coordinated dinuclear [Cu₂(GaCp*)(μ‐GaCp*)₃Ga(OTf)₃] ( 3 ) is formed when Cu(OTf)₂ is combined with [GaCp*] instead of [Ga(ddp)]. Notably, in the course of this redox reaction Lewis acidic Ga(OTf)₃ is formed, which coordinates to one of the electron‐rich copper(0) centres. Compound 3 is suggested as the first case of a structurally characterised complex of copper(0). By changing the copper(II) to a copper(I) source, that is, [Cu(cod)₂][OTf] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene), the salt [Cu₂(GaCp*)₃(μ‐GaCp*)₂][OTf]₂ ( 4 ) is formed, the cationic part of which is related to previously described isoelectronic dinuclear d¹⁰ complexes of the type [M₂(GaCp*)₅] (M=Pd, Pt).     

Revealing the Bonding Pattern from the Molecular Electron Density Using Single Exponential Decay Detector: An Orbital‐Free Alternative to the Electron Localization Function

We introduce a new tool (single exponential decay detector: SEDD) to extract information about bonding and localization in atoms, molecules, or molecular assemblies. The practical evaluation of SEDD does not require any explicit information about the orbitals. The only quantity needed is the electron density (calculated or experimental) and its derivatives up to the second order.     

f‐Element–Metal Bonding and the Use of the Bond Polarity To Build Molecular Intermetalloids

Metal–metal bonding in heterobimetallic complexes is of fundamental interest due to its implications to both bonding theory and new reactivities. In this Concept, structurally authenticated molecular compounds with direct bonds between rare‐earth metals or actinoids and transition or main group metals are summarized. Special attention is given to the use of bond polarity as a tool for designing molecular intermetalloids incorporating rare‐earth atoms and transition metals.     

Catalytic Electron‐Transfer Oxygenation of Substrates with Water as an Oxygen Source Using Manganese Porphyrins

Manganese(V)–oxo–porphyrins are produced by the electron‐transfer oxidation of manganese–porphyrins with tris(2,2′‐bipyridine)ruthenium(III) ([Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺; 2 equiv) in acetonitrile (CH₃CN) containing water. The rate constants of the electron‐transfer oxidation of manganese–porphyrins have been determined and evaluated in light of the Marcus theory of electron transfer. Addition of [Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺ to a solution of olefins (styrene and cyclohexene) in CH₃CN containing water in the presence of a catalytic amount of manganese–porphyrins afforded epoxides, diols, and aldehydes efficiently. Epoxides were converted to the corresponding diols by hydrolysis, and were further oxidized to the corresponding aldehydes. The turnover numbers vary significantly depending on the type of manganese–porphyrin used owing to the difference in their oxidation potentials and the steric bulkiness of the ligand. Ethylbenzene was also oxidized to 1‐phenylethanol using manganese–porphyrins as electron‐transfer catalysts. The oxygen source in the substrate oxygenation was confirmed to be water by using ¹⁸O‐labeled water. The rate constant of the reaction of the manganese(V)–oxo species with cyclohexene was determined directly under single‐turnover conditions by monitoring the increase in absorbance attributable to the manganese(III) species produced in the reaction with cyclohexene. It has been shown that the rate‐determining step in the catalytic electron‐transfer oxygenation of cyclohexene is electron transfer from [Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺ to the manganese–porphyrins.     

Structural and Photophysical Study on Heterobimetallic Complexes with d8–d10 Interactions Supported by Carborane Ligands: Theoretical Analysis of the Emissive Behaviour

Heterobimetallic complexes of formula [M{(PPh₂)₂C₂B₉H₁₀}(S₂C₂B₁₀H₁₀)M′(PPh₃)] (M=Pd, Pt; M′=Au, Ag, Cu) and [Ni{(PPh₂)₂C₂B₉H₁₀}(S₂C₂B₁₀H₁₀)Au(PPh₃)] were obtained from the reaction of [M{(PPh₂)₂C₂B₁₀H₁₀}(S₂C₂B₁₀H₁₀)] (M=Pd, Pt) with [M′(PPh₃)]⁺ (M′=Au, Ag, Cu) or by one‐pot synthesis from [(SH)₂C₂B₁₀H₁₀], (PPh₂)₂C₂B₁₀H₁₀, NiCl₂ ? 6 H₂O, and [Au(PPh₃)]⁺. They display d⁸–d¹⁰ intermetallic interactions and emit red light in the solid state at 77 K. Theoretical studies on [M{(PPh₂)₂C₂B₉H₁₀}(S₂C₂B₁₀H₁₀)Au(PPh₃)] (M=Pd, Pt, Ni) attribute the luminescence to ligand (thiolate, L)‐to‐“P₂‐M‐S₂” (ML′) charge‐transfer (LML′CT) transitions for M=Pt and to metal (M)‐to‐“P₂‐M‐S₂” (ML′) charge‐transfer (MML′CT) transitions for M=Ni, Pd.     

Detailed Investigation of the Structural,Thermal, and Electronic Properties of Gold Isocyanide Complexes with Mechano‐Triggered Single‐Crystal‐to‐Single‐Crystal Phase Transitions

Mechano‐induced phase transitions in organic crystalline materials, which can alter their properties, have received much attention. However, most mechano‐responsive molecular crystals exhibit crystal‐to‐amorphous phase transitions, and the intermolecular interaction patterns in the daughter phase are difficult to characterize. We have investigated phenyl(phenylisocyanide)gold(I) ( 1 ) and phenyl(3,5‐dimethylphenylisocyanide)gold(I) ( 2 ) complexes, which exhibit a mechano‐triggered single‐crystal‐to‐single‐crystal phase transition. Previous reports of complexes 1 and 2 have focused on the relationships between the crystalline structures and photoluminescence properties; in this work we have focused on other aspects. The face index measurements of complexes 1 and 2 before and after the mechano‐induced phase transitions have indicated that they undergo non‐epitaxial phase transitions without a rigorous orientational relationship between the mother and daughter phases. Differential scanning calorimetry analyses revealed the phase transition of complex 1 to be enthalpically driven by the formation of new aurophilic interactions. In contrast, the phase transition of complex 2 was found to be entropically driven, with the closure of an empty void in the mother phase. Scanning electron microscopy observation showed that the degree of the charging effect of both complexes 1 and 2 was changed by the phase transitions, which suggests that the formation of the aurophilic interactions affords more effective conductive pathways. Moreover, flash‐photolysis time‐resolved microwave conductivity measurements revealed that complex 1 increased in conductivity after the phase change, whereas the conductivity of complex 2 decreased. These contrasting results were explained by the different patterns in the aurophilic interactions. Finally, an intriguing disappearing polymorphism of complex 2 has been reported, in which a polymorph form could not be obtained again after some period of time, even with repeated trials. The present studies provide us with a variety of hitherto unknown insights into mechano‐responsive molecular crystals, which help us to understand the phase transition behaviors upon mechanical stimulation and establish rational design principles.     

Intramolecularly Stabilised Group 10 Metal Stannyl and Stannylene Complexes: Multi‐pathway Synthesis and Observation of Platinum‐to‐Tin Alkyl Transfer

Reaction of [PdClMe(P^N)₂] with SnCl₂ followed by Cl‐abstraction leads to apparent Pd?C bond activation, resulting in methylstannylene species trans‐[PdCl{(P^N)₂SnClMe}][BF₄] (P^N=diaryl phosphino‐N‐heterocycle). In contrast, reaction of Pt analogues with SnCl₂ leads to Pt?Cl bond activation, resulting in methylplatinum species trans‐[PtMe{(P^N)₂SnCl₂}][BF₄]. Over time, they isomerise to methylstannylene species, indicating that both kinetic and thermodynamic products can be isolated for Pt, whereas for Pd only methylstannylene complexes are isolated. Oxidative addition of RSnCl₃ (R=Me, Bu, Ph) to M⁰ precursors (M=Pd or Pt) in the presence of P^N ligands results in diphosphinostannylene pincer complexes trans‐[MCl{(P^N)₂SnCl(R)}][SnCl₄R], which are structurally similar to the products from SnCl₂ insertion. This showed that addition of RSnCl₃ to M⁰ results in formal Sn?Cl bond oxidative addition. A probable pathway of activation of the tin reagents and formation of different products is proposed and the relevancy of the findings for Pd and Pt catalysed processes that use SnCl₂ as a co‐catalyst is discussed.     

Nature of Noncovalent Carbon‐Bonding Interactions Derived from Experimental Charge‐Density Analysis

In an effort to better understand the nature of noncovalent carbon‐bonding interactions, we undertook accurate high‐resolution X‐ray diffraction analysis of single crystals of 1,1,2,2‐tetracyanocyclopropane. We selected this compound to study the fundamental characteristics of carbon‐bonding interactions, because it provides accessible σ holes. The study required extremely accurate experimental diffraction data, because the interaction of interest is weak. The electron‐density distribution around the carbon nuclei, as shown by the experimental maps of the electrophilic bowl defined by a (CN)₂C?C(CN)₂ unit, was assigned as the origin of the interaction. This fact was also evidenced by plotting the Δ²ρ(r) distribution. Taken together, the obtained results clearly indicate that noncovalent carbon bonding can be explained as an interaction between confronted oppositely polarized regions. The interaction is, thus electrophilic–nucleophilic (electrostatic) in nature and unambiguously considered as attractive.     

The Quest for PdII–PdII Interactions: Structural and Spectroscopic Studies and Ab Initio Calculations on Dinuclear [Pd2(CN)4(μ‐diphosphane)2] Complexes

Structural and spectroscopic properties of and theoretical investigations on dinuclear [Pd₂(CN)₄(P–P)₂] (P–P=bis(dicyclohexylphosphanyl)methane ( 1 ), bis(dimethylphosphanyl)methane ( 2 )) and mononuclear trans‐[Pd(CN)₂(PCy₃)₂] ( 3 ) complexes are described. Xray structural analyses reveal Pd???Pd distances of 3.0432(7) and 3.307(4) Å in 1 and 2 , respectively. The absorption bands at λ>270 nm in 1 and 2 have 4d →5p_σ electronic‐transition character. Calculations at the CIS level indicate that the two low‐lying dipole‐allowed electronic transition bands in model complex [Pd₂(CN)₄(μ‐H₂PCH₂PH₂)₂] at 303 and 289 nm are due to combinations of many orbital transitions. The calculated interaction‐energy curve for the skewed dimer [{trans‐[Pd(CN)₂(PH₃)₂]}₂] is attractive at the MP2 level and implies the existence of a weak Pd^II–Pd^II interaction.     

The First One‐Pot Synthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks Functionalised with Two Transition‐Metal Complexes

The synthesis of a metal–organic framework (UiO‐67) functionalised simultaneously with two different transition metal complexes (Ir and Pd or Rh) through a one‐pot procedure is reported for the first time. This has been achieved by an iterative modification of the synthesis parameters combined with characterisation of the resulting materials using different techniques, including X‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The method also allows the first synthesis of UiO‐67 with a very wide range of loadings (from 4 to 43 mol %) of an iridium complex ([IrCp*(bpydc)(Cl)Cl]^2?; bpydc=2,2′‐bipyridine‐5,5′‐dicarboxylate, Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) through a pre‐functionalisation methodology.     

A Gallium‐Substituted Distibene and an Antimony‐Analogue Bicyclo[1.1.0]butane: Synthesis and Solid‐State Structures

RGa {R=HC[C(Me)N(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)]₂} reacts with Sb(NMe₂)₃ with insertion into the Sb? N bond and elimination of RGa(NMe₂)₂ ( 2 ), yielding the Ga‐substituted distibene R(Me₂N)GaSb?SbGa(NMe₂)R ( 1 ). Thermolysis of 1 proceeded with elimination of RGa and 2 and subsequent formation of the bicyclo[1.1.0]butane analogue [R(Me₂N)Ga]₂Sb₄ ( 3 ).     

Conjugated Polyelectrolyte‐Induced Self‐Assembly of Alkynylplatinum(II) 2,6‐Bis(benzimidazol‐2′‐yl)pyridine Complexes

Water‐soluble cationic alkynylplatinum(II) 2,6‐bis(benzimidazol‐2′‐yl)pyridine (bzimpy) complexes have been demonstrated to undergo supramolecular assembly with anionic polyelectrolytes in aqueous buffer solution. Metal–metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MMLCT) absorptions and triplet MMLCT (³MMLCT) emissions have been found in UV/Vis absorption and emission spectra of the electrostatic assembly of the complexes with non‐conjugated polyelectrolytes, driven by Pt???Pt and π–π interactions among the complex molecules. Interestingly, the two‐component ensemble formed by [Pt(bzimpy‐Et){C?CC₆H₄(CH₂NMe₃‐4)}]Cl₂ ( 1 ) with para‐linked conjugated polyelectrolyte (CPE), PPE‐SO₃^?, shows significantly different photophysical properties from that of the ensemble formed by 1 with meta‐linked CPE, mPPE‐Ala. The helical conformation of mPPE‐Ala allows the formation of strong mPPE‐Ala– 1 aggregates with Pt???Pt, electrostatic, and π–π interactions, as revealed by the large Stern–Volmer constant at low concentrations of 1 . Together with the reasonably large Förster radius, large HOMO–LUMO gap and high triplet state energy of mPPE‐Ala to minimize both photo‐induced charge transfer (PCT) and Dexter triplet energy back‐transfer (TEBT) quenching of the emission of 1 , efficient Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) from mPPE‐Ala to aggregated 1 molecules and strong ³MMLCT emission have been found, while the less strong PPE‐SO₃^?– 1 aggregates and probably more efficient PCT and Dexter TEBT quenching would account for the lack of ³MMLCT emission in the PPE‐SO₃^?– 1 ensemble.     

Three‐Way Cooperativity in d8 Metal Complexes with Ligands Displaying Chemical and Redox Non‐Innocence

Reversible proton‐ and electron‐transfer steps are crucial for various chemical transformations. The electron‐reservoir behavior of redox non‐innocent ligands and the proton‐reservoir behavior of chemically non‐innocent ligands can be cooperatively utilized for substrate bond activation. Although site‐decoupled proton‐ and electron‐transfer steps are often found in enzymatic systems, generating model metal complexes with these properties remains challenging. To tackle this issue, we present herein complexes [(cod_?H)M(μ‐L^2?) M (cod_?H)] (M=Pt^II, [ 1 ] or Pd^II, [ 2 ], cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene, H₂L=2,5‐di‐[2,6‐(diisopropyl)anilino]‐1,4‐benzoquinone), in which cod acts as a proton reservoir, and L^2? as an electron reservoir. Protonation of [ 2 ] leads to an unusual tetranuclear complex. However, [ 1 ] can be stepwise reversibly protonated with up to two protons on the cod_?H ligands, and the protonated forms can be stepwise reversibly reduced with up to two electrons on the L^2? ligand. The doubly protonated form of [ 1 ] is also shown to react with OMe^? leading to an activation of the cod ligands. The site‐decoupled proton and electron reservoir sources work in tandem in a three‐way cooperative process that results in the transfer of two electrons and two protons to a substrate leading to its double reduction and protonation. These results will possibly provide new insights into developing catalysts for multiple proton‐ and electron‐transfer reactions by using metal complexes of non‐innocent ligands.     

Organometallic Probe for the Electronics of Base‐Stabilized Group 11 Metal Cations

A number of trimetalloborides have been synthesized through the reactions of base‐stabilized coinage metal chlorides with a dimanganaborylene lithium salt in the hope of using this organometallic platform to compare and evaluate the electronics of these popular coinage metal fragments. The adducts of Cu^I, Ag^I, and Au^I ions, stabilized by tricyclohexylphosphine (PCy₃), N‐1,3‐bis(4‐methylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene (ITol), or 1‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)‐3,3,5,5‐tetramethylpyrrolidin‐2‐ylidene (CAAC), with [{Cp(CO)₂Mn}₂B]^? were studied spectroscopically, structurally, and computationally. The geometries of the adducts fall into two classes, one symmetric and one asymmetric, each relying on the combined characteristics of both the metal and ligand. The energetic factors proposed as the causes of the structural differences were investigated by ETS‐NOCV (extended transition state‐natural orbitals for chemical valence) analysis, which showed the final geometry to be controlled by the competition between the tendency of the coinage metal to adopt a higher or lower coordination number and the willingness of the cationic fragment to participate in back‐bonding interactions.     

Nickel(I) Monomers and Dimers with Cyclopentadienyl and Indenyl Ligands

The reaction of (μ‐Cl)₂Ni₂(NHC)₂ (NHC=1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)‐1,3‐dihydro‐2H‐imidazol‐2‐ylidene (IPr) or 1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazolidin‐2‐ylidene (SIPr)) with either one equivalent of sodium cyclopentadienyl (NaCp) or lithium indenyl (LiInd) results in the formation of diamagnetic NHC supported Ni^I dimers of the form (μ‐Cp)(μ‐Cl)Ni₂(NHC)₂ (NHC=IPr ( 1 a ) or SIPr ( 1 b ); Cp=C₅H₅) or (μ‐Ind)(μ‐Cl)Ni₂(NHC)₂ (NHC=IPr ( 2 a ) or SIPr ( 2 b ); Ind=C₇H₉), which contain bridging Cp and indenyl ligands. The corresponding reaction between two equivalents of NaCp or LiInd and (μ‐Cl)₂Ni₂(NHC)₂ (NHC=IPr or SIPr) generates unusual 17 valence electron Ni^I monomers of the form (η⁵‐Cp)Ni(NHC) (NHC=IPr ( 3 a ) or SIPr ( 3 b )) or (η⁵‐Ind)Ni(NHC) (NHC=IPr ( 4 a ) or SIPr ( 4 b )), which have nonlinear geometries. A combination of DFT calculations and NBO analysis suggests that the Ni^I monomers are more strongly stabilized by the Cp ligand than by the indenyl ligand, which is consistent with experimental results. These calculations also show that the monomers have a lone unpaired‐single‐electron in their valence shell, which is the reason for the nonlinear structures. At room temperature the Cp bridged dimer (μ‐Cp)(μ‐Cl)Ni₂(NHC)₂ undergoes homolytic cleavage of the Ni?Ni bond and is in equilibrium with (η⁵‐Cp)Ni(NHC) and (μ‐Cl)₂Ni₂(NHC)₂. There is no evidence that this equilibrium occurs for (μ‐Ind)(μ‐Cl)Ni₂(NHC)₂. DFT calculations suggest that a thermally accessible triplet state facilitates the homolytic dissociation of the Cp bridged dimers, whereas for bridging indenyl species this excited triplet state is significantly higher in energy. In stoichiometric reactions, the Ni^I monomers (η⁵‐Cp)Ni(NHC) or (η⁵‐Ind)Ni(NHC) undergo both oxidative and reductive processes with mild reagents. Furthermore, they are rare examples of active Ni^I precatalysts for the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction. Complexes 1 a , 2 b , 3 a , 4 a and 4 b have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography.     

Lewis Acid Binding and Transfer as a Versatile Experimental Gauge of the Lewis Basicity of Fe0, Ru0, and Pt0 Complexes

A number of zerovalent ruthenium tri‐ and tetracarbonyl complexes of the form [Ru(CO)_5?nL_n] (n=1, 2) with neutral phosphine or N‐heterocyclic carbene donor ligands have been treated with the Lewis acids GaCl₃ and Ag⁺ to form a range of metal‐only Lewis pairs (MOLPs). The spectroscopic and structural parameters of the adducts are compared to each other and to related iron carbonyl based MOLPs. The Lewis basicity of the original Ru⁰ complexes is gauged by transfer experiments, as well as through the degree of pyramidization of the bound GaCl₃ units and the Ru?M bond lengths. The work shows the benefits of the MOLP concept as one of the few direct experimental gauges of metal basicity, and one that can allow comparisons between metal complexes with different metal centers and ligand sets.     

A Multifunctional MnII Phosphonate for Rapid Separation of Methyl Orange and Electron‐Transfer Photochromism

A Mn^II phosphonate of the general formula [Mn(H₂L)₂(H₂O)₂(H₂bibp)] adopts a layered motif with protonated H₂bibp²⁺ cations embedded in the channels (H₄L=thiophene‐2‐phosphonic acid; bibp=4,4′‐bis(1‐imidazolyl)biphenyl). The title compound exhibits excellent adsorptive removal of methyl orange (MO) dye from aqueous solution. Its advantageous features include fast adsorption, high uptake capacity, selective removal, and reusability, which are of great significance for practical application in wastewater treatment. Meanwhile, the compound displays rapid photochromism upon irradiation with visible light at room temperature. Extensive research has demonstrated that such behavior is based on a ligand‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer (LLCT) mechanism. The irradiated sample possesses an ultra‐long‐lived charge‐separated state. Moreover, not only is the compound the first Mn‐based photochromic MOF, but it is also one of the very few examples showing LLCT with non‐photochromic components.     

Supramolecular Polymers Self‐Assembled from trans‐Bis(pyridine) Dichloropalladium(II) and Platinum(II) Complexes

Two structurally similar trans‐bis(pyridine) dichloropalladium(II)‐ and platinum(II)‐type complexes were synthesized and characterized. They both self‐assemble in n‐hexane to form viscous fluids at lower concentrations, but form metallogels at sufficient concentrations. The viscous solutions were studied by capillary viscosity measurements and UV/Vis absorption spectra monitored during the disassembly process indicated that a metallophilic interaction was involved in the supramolecular polymerization process. For the two supramolecular assemblies, uncommon continuous porous networks were observed by using SEM and TEM revealed that they were built from nanofibers that fused and crosslinked with the increase of concentration. The xerogels of the palladium and platinum complexes were carefully studied by using synchrotron radiation WAXD and EXAFS. The WAXD data show close stacking distances driven by π–π and metal–metal interactions and an evident dimer structure for the platinum complex was found. The coordination bond lengths were extracted from fitting of the EXAFS data. Moreover, close Pt^II–Pt^II (Pd^II–Pd^II) and Pt?Cl (Pd?Cl) interactions proposed from DFT calculations in the reported oligo(phenylene ethynylene) (OPE)‐based palladium(II) pyridyl supramolecular polymers were also confirmed by using EXAFS. The Pt^II–Pt^II interaction is more feasible for supramolecular interaction than the Pd^II–Pd^II interaction in our simple case.     

A Bis‐Manganese(II)–DOTA Complex for Pulsed Dipolar Spectroscopy

High‐spin gadolinium(III) and manganese(II) complexes have emerged as alternatives to standard nitroxide radical spin labels for measuring nanometric distances by using pulsed electron–electron double resonance (PELDOR or DEER) at high fields/frequencies. For certain complexes, particularly those with relatively small zero‐field splitting (ZFS) and short distances between the two metal centers, the pseudosecular term of the dipolar coupling Hamiltonian is non‐negligible. However, in general, the contribution from this term during conventional data analysis is masked by the flexibility of the molecule of interest and/or the long tethers connecting them to the spin labels. The efficient synthesis of a model system consisting of two [Mn(dota)]^2? (MnDOTA; DOTA^4?=1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetraacetate) directly connected to the ends of a central rodlike oligo(phenylene–ethynylene) (OPE) spacer is reported. The rigidity of the OPE is confirmed by Q‐band PELDOR measurements on a bis‐nitroxide analogue. The Mn^II?Mn^II distance distribution profile determined by W‐band PELDOR is in reasonable agreement with one simulated by using a simple rotamer analysis. The small degree of flexibility arising from the linking MnDOTA arm appears to outweigh the contribution from the pseudosecular term at this interspin distance. This study illustrates the potential of MnDOTA‐based spin labels for measuring fairly short nanometer distances, and also presents an interesting candidate for in‐depth studies of pulsed dipolar spectroscopy methods on Mn^II?Mn^II systems.