Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x)

If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions K_n over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pⁿ using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β₁, β₂,…, β_n] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K₀, then the Witt equation $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?}\text{y}\text{= β}$ generates a tower of extensions through $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= K}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ where $\text{y}\text{= [}\text{y}{}_1\text{,}\text{y}{}_2\text{,…,}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in K_n. This alternate generation has the form K_i = K_i?1(y_i); y_i^p ? y_i = B_i, where, as a divisor in K_i?1, B_i has the form . In this form q is prime to Πp_j^λ_j and each λ_j is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field K_n over an algebraically closed field of constants.     

Monotonicity of permanents of certain doubly stochastic circulant matrices

Let p_k(A), k=2,…,n, denote the sum of the permanents of all k×k submatrices of the n×n matrix A. A conjecture of Ðokovi?, which is stronger than the famed van der Waerden permanent conjecture, asserts that the functions p_k((1?θ)J_n+;θA), k=2,…, n, are strictly increasing in the interval 0?θ?1 for every doubly stochastic matrix A. Here J_n is the n×n matrix all whose entries are equal $\text{1}\text{n}$. In the present paper it is proved that the conjecture holds true for the circulant matrices A=αI_n+ βP_n, α, β?0, α+;β=1, and $\text{A=}\text{(nJ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?I}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(n?2)}$, where I_n and P_n are respectively the n×n identify matrix and the n×n permutation matrix with 1's in positions (1,2), (2,3),…, (n?1, n), (n, 1).     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

Spaces of matrices of equal rank

Let M_m,n(F) denote the space of all mXn matrices over the algebraically closed field F. A subspace of M_m,n(F), all of whose nonzero elements have rank k, is said to be essentially decomposable if there exist nonsingular mXn matrices U and V respectively such that for any element A, UAV has the form

$\text{UAV=}\text{A}{}_1\text{A}{}_2\text{A}{}_3\text{0}$

where A₁ is iX(k–i) for some i?k. Theorem: If $\text{K}$ is a space of rank k matrices, then either $\text{K}$ is essentially decomposable or dim $\text{K}$?k+1. An example shows that the above bound on non-essentially-decomposable spaces of rank k matrices is sharp whenever n?2k–1.     

Numerical approximation of product integrals

A technique for the numerical approximation of matrix-valued Riemann product integrals is developed. For a ? x < y ? b, I_m(x, y) denotes

$\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{y}\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{v}{}_2\text{?}\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{v}{}_2\text{∏}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{F(ν}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)dν}{}_1\text{dν}{}_2\text{?dν}{}_{\mathrm{m}}$

, and A_m(x, y) denotes an approximation of I_m(x, y) of the form

$\text{(y?x)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{∏}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{F(χ}{}_{\mathrm{ik}}\text{)}$

, where a_k and y_ik are fixed numbers for i = 1, 2,…, m and k = 1, 2,…, N and x_ik = x + (y ? x)y_ik. The following result is established. If p is a positive integer, F is a function from the real numbers to the set of w × w matrices with real elements and F⁽¹⁾ exists and is continuous on [a, b], then there exists a bounded interval function H such that, if n, r, and s are positive integers, $\text{(b ? a)}\text{n}\text{= h < 1, x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= a + hi}\text{for}\text{i = 0, 1,…, n}\text{and}\text{0 < r ? s ? n}$, then

$\text{∏}\text{χ}{}_{\mathrm{r?}}\text{χ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(I+F dχ)?}\text{∏}\text{i=r}\text{s}\text{I+}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{p}\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(χ}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{,χ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$

$\text{=h}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{H(χ}{}_{\mathrm{r?1}}\text{,χ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{)+O(h}{}^{\mathrm{p+1}}\text{)}$

Further, if F^(j) exists and is continuous on [a, b] for j = 1, 2,…, p + 1 and A is exact for polynomials of degree less than p + 1 ? j for j = 1, 2,…, p, then the preceding result remains valid when A_j is substituted for I_j.     

A partition identity

Let n₁+n₂+?+n_m=n where the n_i's are integers (possibly negative or greater than n). Let p=(k₁,…,k_m), where k₁+k₂+?+k_m=k, be a partition of the nonnegative integer k into m nonnegative integers and let P denote the set of all such partitions. For m?2, we prove the combinatorial identity

$\text{∑}\text{p∈P}\text{∏}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{n}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+1?k}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{k}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i?0}\text{j+m?2}\text{m?2}\text{n+1?k?2}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{k?2}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$

which implies the surprising result that the left side of the above equation depends on n but not on the n_i's.     

Duality between some linear preserver problems. II. Isometries with respect to c-special norms and matrices with fixed singular values

Let $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{m\times n}}$ (m?n) denote the linear space of all m × n complex or real matrices according as $\text{F}$=$\text{C}$ or $\text{R}$. Let c=(c₁,…,c_m)≠0 be such that c₁???c_m?0. The c-spectral norm of a matrix A?$\text{F}$_m×n is the quantity

$\text{6A6}{}_{\mathrm{c}}\text{∑}\text{i=I}\text{m}\text{c}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{σ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(A)}$

. where σ₁(A)???σ_m(A) are the singular values of A. Let d=(d₁,…,d_m)≠0, where d₁???d_m?0. We consider the linear isometries between the normed spaces $\text{(}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{m\times }}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{,∥·∥}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>c</mtext>}}\text{)}$ and $\text{(}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{m\times }}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{,∥·∥}{}_{\mathrm{d}}\text{)}$, and prove that they are dual transformations of the linear operators which map $\text{L}$(d) onto $\text{L}$(c), where

$\text{L}\text{(c)= {X?}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{m\times n}}\text{:X}\text{has singular values}\text{c}{}_1\text{,…,c}{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{}}$

.     

Some limit results for longest common subsequences

The length l_n of a longest common subsequence before time n sequences (B₁₁, B₁₂, …) (B₂₁, B₂₂, …) is the cardinality of the largest increasing set of pairs of integers {(j_1α, j_2α)}

$\text{l?}\text{j}{}_{11}\text{<}\text{j}{}_{12}\text{<·<}\text{j}{}_{11}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}\text{n}\text{l?}\text{j}{}_{21}\text{<}\text{j}{}_{22}\text{<·<}\text{j}{}_{21}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}\text{n}$

such that ?1?α?l_n, (B_1j1α=B_2j2α). If B₁ and B₂ are independent random sequences with co-ordinates i.i.d. uniform on {1, 2, …, k}, it follows from Kingman's subadditive ergodic theorem that the ratio l_n/n converges to a constant c_k a.s. A method of deriving lower bounds for the constants c_k is given, the bounds obtained improving known lower bounds, for k>2. The rate of decrease of c_k with k is shown to be no faster than 1/√k, contrasting with P{B_1i?B_2i}=1/k. Finally, an alternative method of deriving lower bounds is given and used to improve the lower bound for c₂.     

Hermite series estimates of a probability density and its derivatives

The following estimate of the pth derivative of a probability density function is examined: $\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{k\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(x)}$, where h_k is the kth Hermite function and $\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{= (}\text{(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{n}\text{)}$Σ_{i = 1}ⁿh_k^(p)(X_i) is calculated from a sequence X₁,…, X_n of independent random variables having the common unknown density. If the density has r derivatives the integrated square error converges to zero in the mean and almost completely as rapidly as O(n^?α) and O(n^?α log n), respectively, where $\text{α =}\text{2(r ? p)}\text{(2r + 1)}$. Rates for the uniform convergence both in the mean square and almost complete are also given. For any finite interval they are O(n^?β) and $\text{O(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?\beta </mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{log}\text{n)}$, respectively, where $\text{β =}\text{(2(r ? p) ? 1)}\text{(2r + 1)}$.     

Strong law for the bootstrap

Let X₁, X₂, X₃, … be i.i.d. r.v. with E|X₁| < ∞, E X₁ = μ. Given a realization X = (X₁,X₂,…) and integers n and m, construct Y_n,i, i = 1, 2, …, m as i.i.d. r.v. with conditional distribution $\text{P}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}\text{= X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{) =}\text{1}\text{n}$ for 1 ? j ? n. ($\text{P}{}^1$ denotes conditional distribution given X). Conditions relating the growth rate of m with n and the moments of X₁ are given to ensure the almost sure convergence of $\text{(}\text{1}\text{m}\text{)Σ}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}$ toμ. This equation is of some relevance in the theory of Bootstrap as developed by Efron (1979) and Bickel and Freedman (1981).     

Duality in hypercomplex function theory

Let $\text{A}$ be the Clifford algebra constructed over a quadratic n-dimensional real vector space with orthogonal basis {e₁,…, e_n}, and e₀ be the identity of $\text{A}$. Furthermore, let M_k(Ω;$\text{A}$) be the set of $\text{A}$-valued functions defined in an open subset Ω of R^m+1 (1 ? m ? n) which satisfy D^kf = 0 in Ω, where D is the generalized Cauchy-Riemann operator $\text{D = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ and k? N. The aim of this paper is to characterize the dual and bidual of M_k(Ω;$\text{A}$). It is proved that, if M_k(Ω;$\text{A}$) is provided with the topology of uniform compact convergence, then its strong dual is topologically isomorphic to an inductive limit space of Fréchet modules, which in its turn admits M_k(Ω;$\text{A}$) as its dual. In this way, classical results about the spaces of holomorphic functions and analytic functionals are generalized.     

On fair coin-tossing games

Let Ω be a finite set with k elements and for each integer $\text{n ≧ 1}$ let $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= Ω × Ω × … × Ω}$ (n-tuple) and $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {(a}{}_1\text{, a}{}_2\text{,…, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) | (a}{}_1\text{, a}{}_2\text{,…, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) ∈ Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ and a_j ≠ a_j+1 for some 1 ≦ j ≦ n ? 1}. Let {Y_m} be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables such that P(Y₁ = a) = k^?1 for all a in Ω. In this paper, we obtain some very surprising and interesting results about the first occurrence of elements in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ and in Ω?_n with respect to the stochastic process {Y_m}. The results here provide us with a better and deeper understanding of the fair coin-tossing (k-sided) process.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

Some explicit formulae in simultaneous padé approximation

Using old results on the explicit calculation of determinants, formulae are given for the coefficients of P₀(z) and P₀(z)f_i(z) ? P_i(z), where P_i(z) are polynomials of degree σ ? ρ_i (i=0,1,…,n), P₀(z)f_i(z) ? P_i(z) are power series in which the terms with z^k, 0?k?σ, vanish (i=1,2,…,n), (ρ₀,ρ₁,…,ρ_n) is an (n+1)-tuple of nonnegative integers, σ=ρ₀+ρ₁+?+ρ_n, and {f_i}ⁿ_i=1 is the set of hypergeometric functions {₁F₁(1;c_i;z)}ⁿ_i=1$\text{(c}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{z.drule;}\text{N}\text{, c}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? c}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{)}$ or {₂F₀(a_i,1;z)}ⁿ_i=1$\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{?}\text{N}\text{, a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? a}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{)}$ under the condition ρ₀?ρ_i ? 1 (i=1,2,…,n).     

The behaviour of (k,…,kn,n−ik)ci/i! is asymptotically normal

Let N(n,i) = (k,…,kⁿ,n?ik)c^i/i, i = O.…,[n/k]. We prove that the random variable X_n such that $\text{P(X}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext>}}\text{= i) =}\text{N(n, i)}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>j</mtext>}}\text{N(n, j)}$ has asymptotically (n → ∞) a normal distribution and we give some combinatorial applications of this result.We also improve a result of Godsil [3] dealing with matchings in graph.     

A determinant of symmetric forms

Let Δ(α + β) = |H_λ2?r+1| where H_r is the complete symmetric function in (α₁ + β₁), (α₂ + β₂), …, (α_n + β_n). It is proved that Δ(α + β) ? Δ(α) + Δ(β). This inequality is generalised for certain symmetric functions defined by Littlewood. Let . Then we prove that Ω(α + β) ? Ω(α) + Ω(β). Here λ₁, λ₂, λ₃, …, λ_n is a partition such that λ_n > λ_n?1 > ··· > λ₂ > λ₁.     

Solution of a system of functional-differential equations arising from an optimization problem

In connection with an optimization problem, all functions ?: Iⁿ → $\text{R}$ with continuous nonzero partial derivatives and satisfying

$\text{??}\text{?x,}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{??}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$

for all x_i, x_j ≠ I, i, j = 1,2,…, n (n > 2) are determined (I is an interval of positive real numbers).     

A subdeterminant inequality for normal matrices

Let A be an n × n normal matrix over $\text{C}$, and Q_m, _n be the set of strictly increasing integer sequences of length m chosen from 1,…,n. For α, β ? Q_m, _n denote by A[α|β] the submatrix obtained from A by using rows numbered α and columns numbered β. For k ? {0, 1,…, m} we write |α∩β| = k if there exists a rearrangement of 1,…, m, say i₁,…, i_k, i_k+1,…, i_m, such that α(i_j) = β(i_j), i = 1,…, k, and {α(i_k+1),…, α(i_m) } ∩ {β(i_k+1),…, β(i_m) } = ?. A new bound for |detA[α|β ]| is obtained in terms of the eigenvalues of A when 2m = n and |α∩β| = 0.Let $\text{U}$_n be the group of n × n unitary matrices. Define the nonnegative number

where | α ∩ β| = k. It is proved that

Let A be semidefinite hermitian. We conjecture that ρ₀(A) ? ρ₁(A) ? ··· ? ρ_m(A). These inequalities have been tested by machine calculations.     

Singular perturbation problems for systems of partial differential equations of elliptic type

Elliptic boundary value problems for systems of nonlinear partial differential equations of the form $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x, u}{}_1\text{, u}{}_2\text{,…, u}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{, ?}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = ?}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x), x ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, i = 1(1)N, j, k = 1(1)n, p_i ? 0, ? being a small parameter, with Dirichlet boundary conditions are considered. It is supposed that a formal approximation Z is given which satisfies the boundary conditions and the differential equations upto the order χ(?) = o(1) in some norm. Then, using the theory of differential inequalities, it is shown that under certain conditions the difference between the exact solution u of the boundary value problem and the formal approximation Z, taken in the sense of a suitable norm, can be made small.