The multiplicative meaning conveyed by visual representations

Research and practitioner articles advocate the use of visual representations in scaffolding elementary students’ learning of multiplication and division. Prior research suggests students use different strategies when provided with different visualized representations of multiplication and division. However, there is relatively little study examining how children’s multiplicative reasoning corresponds with different representations. The present study collected data from 182 elementary students responding to set, area, and length representations of multiplication/division. Rasch modeling was used to estimate item difficulty statistics to measure differences between visual representations. Results suggest that visual representations differed primarily in how unit was represented and quantified, and not regarding the form of representation (set, area, length).     

Analyzing students’ communication and representation of mathematical fluency during group tasks

Findings discussed in this paper are from a larger research project exploring mathematical fluency characteristics, and teacher noticing and interpreting of mathematical fluency. The current study involved students from seven primary classes (Kindergarten – Grade 6, N = 63 students) and investigated students’ written work samples and oral discussions as they collaborated in small groups to solve mathematical tasks. Students displayed mathematical fluency both orally and in written/drawn form. Certain aspects of mathematical fluency were easier to identify orally (adaptive reasoning) particularly for younger students and when students did not provide any written reasoning. Analyzing the oral responses was often needed to identify mathematical fluency beyond knowledge of a correct procedure (strategic competence). Findings suggested that the various representations students used were valuable for observing mathematical fluency. These results suggest that oral assessments as a means to understand and interpret students’ mathematical fluency are necessary.     

Investigating the transformation of a secondary teacher’s knowledge of trigonometric functions

Shulman (1987) defined pedagogical content knowledge as the knowledge required to transform subject-matter knowledge into curricular material and pedagogical representations. This paper presents the results of an exploratory case study that examined a secondary teacher’s knowledge of sine and cosine values in both clinical and professional settings to discern the characteristics of mathematical schemes that facilitate their transformation into learning artifacts and experiences for students. My analysis revealed that the teacher’s knowledge of sine and cosine values consisted of uncoordinated quantitative and arithmetic schemes and that he was cognizant only of the behavioral proficiencies these schemes enable, not the mental actions and conceptual operations they entail. Based on these findings, I hypothesize that the extent to which a teacher is consciously aware of the mental activity that comprises their mathematical conceptions influences their capacity to transform their mathematical knowledge into curricular material and pedagogical representations to effectively support students’ conceptual learning.     

How Students “Unpack” the Structure of a Word Problem: Graphic Representations and Problem Solving

This research investigated how fourth and fifth grade students spontaneously ‘unpacked’ a word problem when generating a graphic representation to aid in problem solution. Relationships among the type of graphic representation produced, spatial visualization, drawing ability, gender, and problem solving also were examined and described. Instrumentation developed for the study included several math challenge tasks, a spatial visualization task, and a drawing task. For one of the math challenge tasks, students were instructed to draw a picture to assist them with problem solution. These graphic representations generated by students were rated as pictorial or as displaying some level of schematic representation. Schematic representations included germane information from the problem supportive of problem solution. Pictorial representations included expressive and extraneous elements not necessary for problem solution, with no schematic elements. Findings indicated that the majority of students rendered schematic representations, with girls more likely than boys to use schematic representations at a statistically significant level. Students who used schematic visual representations were more successful problem solvers than those pictorially representing problem elements. The more “schematic‐like” the visual representation, the more successful students were at problem solution. Drawing a pictorial representation in the math challenge task also was negatively correlated to drawing skill.     

High school students' use of representations in physics problem solving

Findings from physics education research strongly point to the critical need for teachers’ use of multiple representations in their instructional practices such as pictures, diagrams, written explanations, and mathematical expressions to enhance students' problem‐solving ability. In this study, we explored use of problem‐solving tasks for generating multiple representations as a scaffolding strategy in a high school modeling physics class. Through problem‐solving cognitive interviews with students, we investigated how a group of students responded to the tasks and how their use of such strategies affected their problem‐solving performance and use of representations as compared to students who did not receive explicit, scaffolded guidance to generate representations in solving similar problems. Aggregated data on students' problem‐solving performance and use of representations were collected from a set of 14 mechanics problems and triangulated with cognitive interviews. A higher percentage of students from the scaffolding group constructed visual representations in their problem‐solving solutions, while their use of other representations and problem‐solving performance did not differ with that of the comparison group. In addition, interviews revealed that students did not think that writing down physics concepts was necessary despite being encouraged to do so as a support strategy.     

How visual representations participate in algebra classes’ mathematical activity

Our aim is to discuss how a visual display introduced in a classroom activity to represent a specific algebraic procedure is transformed, taking a central role and modifying the ongoing activity. To discuss how visualization comes about in this activity, we describe an illustrative example selected from observations carried out in a 9th grade classroom and analyze the class interaction from a cultural-historical perspective. Our analysis illuminates the tensions that emerge from a difference between the teacher’s way of signifying the algebraic procedure and the students’ overuse of a visual display they associate with it, and how these tensions impel changes in the activity. We further discuss some pros and cons of using visual displays in algebra classes, and we argue that it is very important for the teacher to be aware of them in order to realize the benefits of using such displays.     

Students’ geometric thinking with cube representations: Assessment framework and empirical evidence

While representations of 3D shapes are used in the teaching of geometry in lower secondary school, it is known that such representations can provide difficulties for students. In order to assess students’ thinking about 3D shapes, we constructed an assessment framework based on existing research studies and data from G7-9 students (aged 12–15). We then applied our framework to assess students’ geometric thinking in lessons. We report two cases of qualitative findings from a classroom experiment in which Grade 7 students (aged 12–13) tackled a problem in 3D geometry that was, for them, quite challenging. We found that students who failed to answer given problems did not mentally manipulate representations effectively, while others could mentally manipulate representations and reason about them in order to reach correct solutions. We conclude with the proposition that this finding shows the framework can be used by teachers in instruction to assess their students’ 3D geometric thinking.     

Teachers’ views on dynamically linked multiple representations, pedagogical practices and students’ understanding of mathematics using TI-Nspire in Scottish secondary schools

Do teachers find that the use of dynamically linked multiple representations enhances their students’ relational understanding of the mathematics involved in their lessons and what evidence do they provide to support their findings? Throughout session 2008–2009, this empirical research project involved six Scottish secondary schools, two mathematics teachers from each school and students from different ages and stages. Teachers used TI-Nspire PC software and students the TI-Nspire handheld technology. This technology is specifically designed to allow dynamically linked multiple representations of mathematical concepts such that pupils can observe links between cause and effect in different representations such as dynamic geometry, graphs, lists and spreadsheets. The teachers were convinced that the use of multiple representations of mathematical concepts enhanced their students’ relational understanding of these concepts, provided evidence to support their argument and described changes in their classroom pedagogy.     

Young students’ subjective interpretations of mathematical diagrams: elements of the theoretical construct “frame-based interpreting competence”

During the last few decades several studies have showed that mathematical visual aids are not at all self-explanatory. Nevertheless, students do make sense of those representations spontaneously and—as a matter of course—cannot avoid their own sense-making. Further, the function of visual aids as “re-presentation” of a given structure is complemented through an epistemological function to explore mathematical structures and generate new meaning. But in which way do socially learned interpreting schemes (frames) influence children’s subjective interpretations of mathematical diagrams? The CORA project investigates which frames can be reconstructed in young pupils’ interpretations of visual diagrams. This paper presents central ideas, theoretical background and—by means of short sequences from pre- and post-interviews—first aspects of “frame-based interpreting competence”. We describe children’s subjective frames in a range between “object-oriented” (focus on the diagram’s visible elements) and “system-oriented” (focus on relation between those elements).     

Exploiting the potential of primary historical sources in primary school: a focus on teacher’s actions

Integrating history of mathematics in classes could be a hard task with young pupils. Indeed, original historical sources have a language that is far from the modern one. Such texts represent cultural artefacts that can give access to mathematical knowledge. The teacher can exploit such potential acting as a mediator between the mathematical signs of the source and those signs that are accessible to students. Through a case study, we investigate the role of the teacher in the process of semiotic mediation during a collective discussion. The analysed intervention is made of two phases: firstly, students work collaboratively and secondly, the teacher mediates a discussion aimed at institutionalizing the knowledge. During the discussion, working on a text from Tartaglia’s translation of Euclid’s Elements, a group of fifth graders constructs a definition of prime numbers. Referring to the Theory of Semiotic Mediation, we analyse the role of the teacher in building up semiotic chains linking students’ productions to an institutionalized knowledge emerging from the collective discussion. We highlight how teacher’s focalization on students’ words allows the progress of the discussion: the potential of the historical text is exploited fostering a definition that is close to culturally shared mathematics.     

Third‐grade teachers’ self‐reported use of multiplication and division models

Visual representations and manipulatives are a highly advocated mathematical tool for the teaching and learning of multiplication and division. Although there is some prior research on elementary teachers’ general use of manipulatives and visual representations, there is little to no specific focus on use of such representations on a specific mathematical concept. The present study examined third grade teachers’ reported use of visual representations for teaching multiplication and division. Findings indicate prevalent use of discrete models and infrequent use of continuous models. Length models and number lines are rarely used across all Common Core standards focusing on multiplication/division, with numeric‐only representations being reported frequently across all standards. Groups‐of and array models were the most prevalent visual model reported by third grade teachers. Although teachers report higher degrees of access to certain materials than previous reports on manipulative use, interview data suggests this may have more to do with purchase agreements between school districts and textbook companies than pedagogical preferences of classroom teachers. Supporting findings in prior decades, teachers in the present study report prevalent use of flashcards, charts and grid paper, and variations of counters.     

Use of words and visuals in modelling context of annual plant

This study looks at the various verbal and non-verbal representations used in a process of modelling the number of annual plants over time. Analysis focuses on how various representations such as words, diagrams, letters and mathematical equations evolve in the mathematization process of the modelling context. Our results show that (1) visual representations such as flowcharts are used not only in the process to symbolization, but also used in the justification of symbols, (2) some of the visual representations serve as a bridge between the words in the problem context and the symbols that represent the mathematical equations of the number of annual plants and (3) words and context help to introduce visual representations and symbols. Also, once students come up with the visual representations and symbols, they show better understanding about words used in the problem context. These observations imply that the modelling and mathematization process is not just one-directional and linear from words describing real-life situations to the symbols in mathematical equations and expressions. Rather, the mathematization can be promoted through using other visuals that help make this transition smooth by organizing the given information in a way that can be used towards mathematization.     

Empirical reconstruction of learning progressions based on teachers’ tagging of didactic metadata

In their enactment of the curriculum, teachers have a substantial role as instructional designers. Accordingly, any evaluation of the progression of students’ learning should first be concerned with the pedagogical intentions of the teacher. In this article we present a method for reconstructing teachers’ implicit and tacit considerations in their selection, sequencing and enactment of tasks. Two 11^th grade teachers tagged all of the tasks that comprised a 5-week learning progression. Tagging consisted of assigning values to prescribed categories of metadata. Visual representations of the metadata revealed patterns in the tagged progressions, and allowed the teachers to reflect upon these patterns. Both teachers, though guided by very different didactical considerations, validated that many of their explicit and implicit intentions were revealed in the representations of the progressions. Furthermore, both teachers had the opportunity to reflect on tacit aspects of their instructional design that they were not previously aware of.     

Observing mathematical fluency through students’ oral responses

‘Procedural’ fluency in mathematics is often judged solely on numerical representations. ‘Mathematical’ fluency incorporates explaining and justifying as well as producing correct numerical solutions. To observe mathematical fluency, representations additional to a student’s numerical work should be considered. This paper presents analysis of students’ oral responses. Findings suggested oral responses are important vantage points from which to view fluency – particularly characteristics harder to notice through numerical work such as reasoning. Students’ oral responses were particularly important when students’ written (language) responses were absent/inconsistent. Findings also revealed the importance of everyday language alongside technical terms for observing reasoning as a fluency characteristic. Students used high modality verbs and language features, such as connectives, to explain concepts and justify their thinking. The results of this study purport that to gain a fuller picture of students’ fluency, specifically their explanations or reasoning, students’ oral responses should be analyzed, not simply numerical work.     

A teacher’s learning process in dual design research: learning to scaffold language in a multilingual mathematics classroom

In this paper, we argue that dual design research (DDR) is a fruitful way to promote and trace the development of a mathematics teacher’s expertise. We address the question of how a teacher participating in dual design research can learn to scaffold students’ development of the language required for mathematical learning in multilingual classrooms. Empirical data were collected from two teaching experiments (each with 8 lessons, and 21 and 22 students, aged 11–12 years), for which lesson series about line graphs were co-designed by the researchers and the teacher. The teacher’s learning process was promoted (e.g. by conducting stimulated recall interviews and providing feedback) and traced (e.g. by carrying out 5 pre- and post-interviews before and after the teaching experiments). An analytic framework for teachers’ reported and derived learning outcomes was used to analyse pre- and post-interviews. The teacher’s learning process was analysed in terms of changes in knowledge and beliefs, changes in practice and intentions for practice. Further analysis showed that this learning process could be attributed to the characteristics of dual design research, for instance the cyclic and interventionist character, the continuous process of prediction and reflection that lies at its heart, and the process of co-designing complemented with stimulated recall interviews.     

Mathematics and science teacher educators' use of representations of practice: A mixed methods study

This study sought to explore math and science teacher educators' use of various media to represent practice within methods courses. There is little understanding of why certain media is used over other representations and the rationale for these choices. Specifically, the study focused on the prevalence and familiarity of teacher educators with comics and animations, standard videos, and 360 videos. This mixed methods study utilized a survey and interviews to ascertain math and science teacher educators' level of familiarity and perceived usefulness of representations of practice. Results indicate that standard video is by far the most used representation of practice in methods classes with three themes explaining this finding: access to representations of practice, dimensions of representation, and pertinacity of using representations. Familiarity with representations of practice relates to teacher educators' perceptions of access thereby indicating a need for teacher educators to have better access to representations. Implications of this study include supporting current literature about the relationship between the level of familiarity and perceived usefulness in media along with the potential need for a central platform that houses these representations of practice resources for teacher educators.     

The initial treatment of the concept of function in the selected secondary school mathematics textbooks in the US and China

In order to provide insight into cross-national differences in students’ achievement, this study compares the initial treatment of the concept of function sections of Chinese and US textbooks. The number of lessons, contents, and mathematical problems were analyzed. The results show that the US curricula introduce the concept of function one year earlier than the Chinese curriculum and provide strikingly more problems for students to work on. However, the Chinese curriculum emphasizes developing both concepts and procedures and includes more problems that require explanations, visual representations, and problem solving in worked-out examples that may help students formulate multiple solution methods. This result could indicate that instead of the number of problems and early introduction of the concept, the cognitive demands of textbook problems required for student thinking could be one reason for differences in American and Chinese students’ performances in international comparative studies. Implications of these findings for curriculum developers, teachers, and researchers are discussed.     

Learning to See: Making Sense of the Mathematics of Change in Middle School

In this article, we will describe the results of a study of 6th grade students learning about the mathematics of change. The students in this study worked with software environments for the computer and the graphing calculator that included a simulation of a moving elevator, linked to a graph of its velocity vs. time. We will describe how the students and their teacher negotiated the mathematical meanings of these representations, in interaction with the software and other representational tools available in the classroom. The class developed ways of selectively attending to specific features of stacks of centimeter cubes, hand-drawn graphs, and graphs (labeled velocity vs. time) on the computer screen. In addition, the class became adept at imagining the motions that corresponded to various velocity vs. time graphs. In this article, we describe this development as a process of learning to see mathematical representations of motion. The main question this article addresses is: How do students learn to see mathematical representations in ways that are consistent with the discipline of mathematics? This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Capitalizing on Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Classroom Blogging

The challenge many teachers face is how to incorporate new technology into their classrooms that strengthens classroom learning by capitalizing on students’ media literacies. Blogs, a new and innovative technological tool, can be used in math and science classrooms to support student learning by capitalizing on students’ interests and familiarity with on‐line communication. This study explores the emerging blogging practices of one high school mathematics teacher and his class to explore issues of intent, use, and perceived value. Data sources for this case included one year's worth of blog content, an interview with the facilitating teacher, and students ‘perceptions of classroom blogging practices. Findings indicate that (1) teachers’ intentions focused on creating additional forms of participation as well as increasing student exposure time with content; (2) blogs were used in a wide variety of ways that likely afforded particular benefits; and (3) both teacher and students perceived the greater investment to be worthwhile. The findings are used to critically consider claims made in the literature about the potential of blogging to effectively support classroom learning.