Probing the Rotational Dynamics of meso‐(2‐Substituted)aryl Substituents in A2B‐Type Subporphyrins

A₂B‐type B‐methoxy subporphyrins 3 a – g and B‐phenyl subporphyrins 7 a – c , e , g bearing meso‐(2‐substituted)aryl substituents are synthesized, and their rotational dynamics are examined through variable‐temperature (VT) ¹H NMR spectroscopy. In these subporphyrins, the rotation of meso‐aryl substituents is hindered by a rationally installed 2‐substituent. The rotational barriers determined are considerably smaller than those reported previously for porphyrins. Comparison of the rotation activation parameters reveals a variable contribution of ΔH^≠ and ΔS^≠ in ΔG^≠. 2‐Methyl and 2‐ethyl groups of the meso‐aryl substituents in subporphyrins 3 e , 3 f , and 7 e induce larger rotational barriers than 2‐alkoxyl substituents. The rotational barriers of 3 g and 7 g are reduced by the presence of the 4‐dibenzylamino group owing to its ability to stabilize the coplanar rotation transition state electronically. The smaller rotational barriers found for B‐phenyl subporphyrins than for B‐methoxy subporphyrins indicate a negligible contribution of S_N1‐type heterolysis in the rotation of meso‐aryl substituents.     

Periphery-Fused Chiral A2B-Type Subporphyrin

Despite significant interest, the chiroptical properties of subporphyrins have rarely been investigated because chiral subporphyrins are elusive. Here, inherently chiral subporphyrins are elaborated by forming a fused pyran ring at the periphery of an A₂B-type meso-aryl-substituted subporphyrin. Their circular dichroism (CD) properties are largely affected by the peripheral substituents and the dihedral angles between the meso-aryl substituents and the subporphyrin core: the β-perbromo subporphyrin with an orthogonal arrangement of the meso-phenyl substituents to the subporphyrin core exhibits weak CD signals corresponding to the Q bands, whereas the unsubstituted species with smaller dihedral angles shows relatively intense CD signals. A detailed structure–property relationship of these chiral subporphyrins was elucidated by time-dependent (TD) DFT calculations. This study reveals that the CD properties of chiral subporphyrins can be controlled by peripheral substitution and meso-aryl substituents.     

meso‐Free BIII Subporphyrins with Electron‐donating Groups

meso‐Free B^III 5,10‐bis(p‐dimethylaminophenyl)subporphyrins were synthesized. They display red‐shifted absorption and fluorescence spectra, bathochromic behaviors in polar solvents, a high fluorescence quantum yield (Φ_F=0.57), and a small HOMO–LUMO gap mainly due to destabilized HOMO as compared with meso‐free B^III 5,10‐diphenylsubporphyrin. This subporphyrin serves as a nice precursor of various meso‐substituted B^III subporphyrins such as B^III meso‐nitrosubporphyrin, B^III meso‐aminosubporphyrin, and meso‐meso’ linked B^III azosubporphyrin dimer. Reactions of meso‐free B^III subporphyrins with NBS or bis(2,4,6‐trimethylpyridine)bromonium hexafluorophosphate gave meso‐meso′ linked subporphyrin dimers, often as a major product along with meso‐bromosubporphyrins.     

Acetylene and trans‐Ethylene Bridged BIII‐Subporphyrin Dimers

Acetylene and trans‐ethylene bridged B^III‐subporphyrin dimers were synthesized by cross‐coupling reactions of meso‐bromo B^III subporphyrin. These dimers display perturbed and red‐shifted absorption spectra reaching around 750 nm and fluorescence reaching at around 850 nm with high quantum yields of 0.39 and 0.47, respectively. DFT calculations have revealed that the HOMOs and the LUMOs of both dimers are spread over the two subporphyrin units as an indication of effective conjugation between the two subporphyrin units. The large Stokes shifts and characteristic pico‐second time‐resolved transient absorption spectra indicated that the S₁‐states of the dimers relax with structural changes, which are larger for the trans‐ethylene bridged dimer.     

meso‐Nitro‐ and meso‐Aminosubporphyrinatoboron(III)s and meso‐to‐meso Azosubporphyrinatoboron(III)s

meso‐Nitrosubporphyrinatoboron(III) was synthesized by nitration of meso‐free subporphyrin with AgNO₂/I₂. The subsequent reduction with a combination of NaBH₄ and Pd/C gave meso‐aminosubporphyrinatoboron(III). meso‐Nitro‐ and meso‐amino‐groups significantly influenced the electronic properties of subporphyrin, which has been confirmed by NMR and UV/Vis spectra, electrochemical analysis, and DFT calculations. Oxidation of meso‐aminosubporphyrinatoboron(III)s with PbO₂ cleanly gave meso‐to‐meso azosubporphyrinatoboron(III)s that exhibited almost coplanar conformations and large electronic interaction through the azo‐bridge.     

Synthesis of Peripherally Nitrated,Aminated, and Arylaminated Subporphyrins

2‐Nitro‐5,10,15‐tri(4‐tert‐butylphenyl)subporphyrin 2 was prepared by the nitration of 5,10,15‐tri(4‐tert‐ butylphenyl)subporphyrin 1a with five equivalents of Cu(NO₃)₂ ? 5 H₂O in a mixed EtOAc/Ac₂O solution and was reduced into 2‐amino‐5,10,15‐tri(4‐tert‐butylphenyl)subporphyrin 3 . Bromination of 5,10,15‐triphenylsubporphyrin 1b with 1.5 equivalents of N‐bromosuccinimide (NBS) gave 2‐bromo‐5,10,15‐triphenylsubporphyrin, which was converted into various 2‐arylamino‐5,10,15‐triphenylsubporphyrins ( 4a , 4b , 4c , 4d ) and 2‐benzamido‐5,10,15‐triphenylsubporphyrin 5 through Pd‐catalyzed cross‐coupling reactions. These molecules constitute the first examples of mono‐β‐substituted subporphyrins. These subporphyrins exhibit significantly perturbed optical and electrochemical properties, which reflect a large influence of the peripherally attached substituents on the electronic networks of subporphyrins.     

Three New Alkaloids from the Leaves of Uncaria rhynchophylla

Three new alkaloids, 2′‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐11‐hydroxyvincoside lactam ( 1 ), 22‐O‐demethyl‐22‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosylisocorynoxeine ( 2 ), and (4S)‐corynoxeine N‐oxide ( 3 ) were isolated from the leaves of Uncaria rhynchophylla, together with four known tetracyclic oxindole or indole alkaloids, isocorynoxeine N‐oxide ( 4 ), rhynchophylline N‐oxide ( 5 ), isorhynchophylline N‐oxide ( 6 ), and dihydrocorynantheine ( 7 ), and an indole alkaloid glycoside, strictosidine ( 8 ). The structures of 1 – 3 were elucidated by spectroscopic methods including UV, IR, ESI‐TOF‐MS, 1D‐ and 2D‐NMR, as well as CD experiments. The activity assay showed that 8 (IC₅₀=8.3 μM ) exhibited potent inhibitory activity on lipopolysaccharide(LPS)‐induced nitrogen monoxide (NO) release in N9 microglia cells. However, only weak inhibitory activities were observed for 1 – 7 (IC₅₀>100 μM for 1 – 6 or >30 μM for 7 ).     

Capped Subporphyrins

Capped subporphyrins 12 – 16 with C₃ molecular symmetry were synthesized from 5,10,15‐tri(3‐aminophenyl)‐substituted subporphyrin 8 and tripodal trialdehydes 2 – 6 by Lindsey’s entropically favored macrocyclization. X‐ray diffraction analysis has revealed that the concave surface of the subporphyrin core is selectively capped with a 1,3,5‐substituted benzene moiety. Capped subporphyrins 15 and 16 , with a five‐atom arm and thus large inner cavities, exhibit solvent incorporation behavior in their crystal structures. On the other hand, subporphyrins 12 and 13 exhibit tight structures, in which the cap and subporphyrin core are found much closer with average interplanar separations of 3.56 and 3.15 Å, respectively. Variable‐temperature ¹H NMR measurements revealed that subporphyrins 12 , 13 , and 16 undergo spiral interconversions between P and M forms depending on the arm length and the electronic nature of the cap. Of these, subporphyrin 13 , with a 1,3,5‐tri(alkoxycarbonyl)benzene cap strapped by three‐atom arms, exhibits a considerably slow spiral interconversion with a large enthalpy change of ΔH^≠=76.4 kJ mol^?1 and a characteristic redshift of the Soret‐like band and enhancement of the Q(0,0) band. These properties are ascribed to considerable through‐space charge‐transfer interactions between the electron‐deficient cap and the subporphyrin core and the multiple CH? π interactions.     

β,β‐Diborylated Subporphyrinato Boron(III) Complexes as Useful Synthetic Precursors

Iridium‐catalyzed borylation of B‐aryl meso‐free subporphyrinato boron(III) complexes (hereinafter referred to simply as subporphyrins) with bis(pinacolato)diboron gave 2,13‐diborylated subporphyrins regioselectively, which served as promising synthetic precursors for 2,13‐diarylated subporphyrins and doubly β‐to‐β 1,3‐butadiyne‐bridged subporphyrin dimers. 2,13‐Diarylated subporphyrins display perturbed absorption spectra, depending upon the β‐aryl substituents. Doubly 1,3‐butadiyne‐bridged syn and anti subporphyrin dimers thus prepared exhibit differently altered absorption spectra with split Soret‐like bands, which have been accounted for in terms of exciton coupling.     

Singly and Doubly Quinoxaline-Fused BIII Subporphyrins

B-Phenyl B^III subporphyrin-α-diones prepared in a three-step reaction sequence from the parent subporphyrin were condensed with 1,2-diaminobenzenes to give the corresponding quinoxaline-fused subporphyrins in variable yields. Quinoxaline-fused B-phenyl-5,10,15-triphenyl B^III subporphyrin was transformed to the corresponding subporphyrin-α-dione in the same three-step reaction sequence, which was then condensed with 1,2-diaminobenzene to give doubly quinoxaline-fused subporphyrin. These quinoxaline-fused subporphyrins exhibit redshifted absorption and fluorescence spectra compared with the parent one. A singly quinoxaline-fused subporphyrin bearing three meso-bis(4-dimethylaminophenyl)aminophenyl substituents shows blueshifted fluorescence in less polar solvent, which has been ascribed to emission associated with charge recombination of intramolecular charge transfer (CT) state.     

Stable Subporphyrin meso-Aminyl Radicals without Resonance Stabilization by a Neighboring Heteroatom

Most aminyl radicals studied so far are resonance-stabilized by neighboring heteroatoms, and those without such stabilization are usually short-lived. We report herein that subporphyrin meso-2,4,6-trichlorophenylaminyl radicals and a bis(5-subporphyrinyl)aminyl radical are fairly stable under ambient conditions without such stabilization. The subporphyrin meso-2,4,6-trichlorophenylaminyl radical crystal structure displays a characteristically short C_meso−N bond and a perpendicular arrangement of the meso-arylamino group. The stabilities of these radicals have been ascribed to extensive spin delocalization over the subporphyrin π-electronic network as well as steric protection around the aminyl radical center.     

Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution Reactions of meso‐Bromosubporphyrin: Synthesis of a Thiopyrane‐Fused Subporphyrin

meso‐Bromosubporphyrin undergoes nucleophilic aromatic substitution (S_NAr) reactions with arylamines, diarylamines, phenols, ethanol, thiophenols, and n‐butanethiol in the presence of suitable bases to provide the corresponding substitution products. The S_NAr reactions also proceed well with pyrrole, indole, and carbazole to provide substitution products in moderate to good yields. Finally, the S_NAr reaction with 2‐bromothiophenol and subsequent intramolecular peripheral arylation reaction affords a thiopyrane‐fused subporphyrin.     

Direct Amination of meso‐Tetraarylporphyrin Derivatives – Easy Route to A3B‐, A2BC‐, and A2B2‐Type Porphyrins Bearing Two Nitrogen‐Containing Substituents at the meso‐Positioned Phenyl Groups

meso‐Tetraarylporphyrinato complexes 1a – g (Zn^II, Cu^II, and Ni^II) bearing one or two nitro‐substituted aryl moieties react with 1,1,1‐trimethylhydrazinium iodide in the presence of ^tBuOK in THF at 0–5° or in the presence of KOH in DMSO at 60–70° according to a nucleophilic substitution of an H‐atom, thus affording porphyrins 2a – g and 3f , g with amino‐functionalized meso‐positioned aryl substituents in yields up to 73% (Scheme 1 and Table). The products obtained are attractive intermediates for further derivatization of porphyrins and may be of potential use as sensitizers in photodynamic cancer therapy.     

Evaluation of Anisole‐Substituted Boron Difluoride Formazanate Complexes for Fluorescence Cell Imaging

Evaluation of three subclasses of boron difluoride formazanate complexes bearing o‐, m‐, and p‐anisole N‐aryl substituents (Ar) as readily accessible alternatives to boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY) dyes for cell imaging applications is described. While the wavelengths of maximum absorption (λ_max) and emission (λ_em) observed for each subclass of complexes, which differed by their carbon‐bound substituents (R), were similar, the emission quantum yields for 7 a – c (R=cyano) were enhanced relative to 8 a – c (R=nitro) and 9 a – c (R=phenyl). Complexes 7 a – c and 8 a – c were also significantly easier to reduce electrochemically to their radical anion and dianion forms compared to 9 a – c . Within each subclass, the o‐substituted derivatives were more difficult to reduce, had shorter λ_max and λ_em, and lower emission quantum yields than the p‐substituted analogues as a result of sterically driven twisting of the N‐aryl substituents and a decrease in the degree of π‐conjugation. The m‐substituted complexes were the least difficult to reduce and possessed intermediate λ_max, λ_em, and quantum yields. The complexes studied also exhibited large Stokes shifts (82–152 nm, 2143–5483 cm^?1). Finally, the utility of complex 7 c (Ar=p‐anisole, R=cyano), which can be prepared for just a few dollars per gram, for fluorescence cell imaging was demonstrated. The use of 7 c and 4′,6‐diamino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) allowed for simultaneous imaging of the cytoplasm and nucleus of mouse fibroblast cells.     

Oligoporphyrin Arrays Conjugated to [60]Fullerene: Preparation,NMR Analysis,and Photophysical and Electrochemical Properties

We report the synthesis and physical properties of novel fullerene–oligoporphyrin dyads. In these systems, the C‐spheres are singly linked to the terminal tetrapyrrolic macrocycles of rod‐like meso,meso‐linked or triply‐linked oligoporphyrin arrays. Monofullerene–mono(Zn^II porphyrin) conjugate 3 was synthesized to establish a general protocol for the preparation of the target molecules (Scheme 1). The synthesis of the meso,meso‐linked oligopophyrin–bisfullerene conjugates 4 – 6 , extending in size up to 4.1 nm ( 6 ), was accomplished by functionalization (iodination followed by Suzuki cross‐coupling) of the two free meso‐positions in oligomers 21 – 23 (Schemes 2 and 3). The attractive interactions between a fullerene and a Zn^II porphyrin chromophore in these dyads was quantified as ΔG=−3.3 kcal mol⁻¹ by variable‐temperature (VT) ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy (Table 1). As a result of this interaction, the C‐spheres adopt a close tangential orientation relative to the plane of the adjacent porphyrin nucleus, as was unambiguously established by ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR (Figs. 9 and 10), and UV/VIS spectroscopy (Figs. 13–15). The synthesis of triply‐linked diporphyrin–bis[60]fullerene conjugate 8 was accomplished by Bingel cyclopropanation of bis‐malonate 45 with two C₆₀ molecules (Scheme 5). Contrary to the meso,meso‐linked systems 4 – 6 , only a weak chromophoric interaction was observed for 8 by UV/VIS spectroscopy (Fig. 16 and Table 2), and the ¹H‐NMR spectra did not provide any evidence for distinct orientational preferences of the C‐spheres. Comprehensive steady‐state and time‐resolved UV/VIS absorption and emission studies demonstrated that the photophysical properties of 8 differ completely from those of 4 – 6 and the many other known porphyrin–fullerene dyads: photoexcitation of the methano[60]fullerene moieties results in quantitative sensitization of the lowest singlet level of the porphyrin tape, which is low‐lying and very short lived. The meso,meso‐linked oligoporphyrins exhibit ¹O₂ sensitization capability, whereas the triply‐fused systems are unable to sensitize the formation of ¹O₂ because of the low energy content of their lowest excited states (Fig. 18). Electrochemical investigations (Table 3, and Figs. 19 and 20) revealed that all oligoporphyrin arrays, with or without appended methano[60]fullerene moieties, have an exceptional multicharge storage capacity due to the large number of electrons that can be reversibly exchanged. Some of the Zn^II porphyrins prepared in this study form infinite, one‐dimensional supramolecular networks in the solid state, in which the macrocycles interact with each other either through H‐bonding or metal ion coordination (Figs. 6 and 7).     

Stable (BIII-Subporphyrin-5-yl)dicyanomethyl Radicals

Stable B^III-subporphyrin-substituted dicyanomethyl radicals were synthesized by S_NAr reaction of meso-bromo- or meso-chlorosubporphyrins with malononitrile followed by oxidation with PbO₂. Different from previously reported dicyanomethyl radicals that underwent σ- or π-dimer formation both in the solid state and in solutions, subporphyrin-stabilized dicyanomethyl radicals exist as monomers in solutions even at low temperature. DFT calculations revealed efficient spin delocalization over the entire subporphyrin. In the solid state, these radicals form weak π-dimers with antiferromagnetic interactions depending on the crystal packing structures.     

Compounds of nickel(II) with 5SR,7RS,12SR,14SR-5,12-dimethyl-7,14-diphenyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane, rmL: The structures of [Ni(rmL)](ClO4)2 · 0.5H2O and cis-[Ni(rmL)(acac)]ClO4

The imine functions of [Ni(mL¹)](ClO₄)₂ (mL¹ = meso-7RS,14SR-5,12-dimethyl-7,14-diphenyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradeca-4,11-diene) are reduced by using NaBH₄ in acetonitrile/methanol to form the meso–meso and rac–meso isomeric cyclic tetramine complex cations [Ni(mmL²)]²⁺ and [Ni(rmL²)]²⁺ (mml² = 5RS,7RS,12SR,14SR- and rmL² = 5SR,7RS,12SR,14SR-5,12-dimethyl-7,14-diphenyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) in ca. 8:1 proportions. [Ni(rmL²)]²⁺ is also prepared from rmL², formed in <1% yield by the reduction of mL¹ by NaBH₄ in ethanol. Square planar singlet ground state (S = 1) salts [Ni(rmL²)](ClO₄)₂ and [Ni(rmL²)][ZnCl₄] and triplet ground state (S = 3) trans-di-ligand octahedral compounds trans-[Ni(rmL²)X₂] ,μ-Y-trans-[Ni(rmL²)Y] and folded macrocycle compounds cis-[Ni(rmL²)(acac)]CIO₄ (acac⁻ = pentane-2,4-dionato), cis-[{Ni(rmL²)}₂(C₂O₄)](ClO₄)₂, cis-[Ni(rmL²)(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ and cis-[Ni(rmL²)X₂], X⁻ = Cl⁻, Br⁻, are described. The S = 1 salt 1SR,4SR,5SR,7RS,8RS,11RS,12SR,14SR-[Ni(rmL²)](ClO₄)₂ · 0.5H₂O has a disordered structure with Ni(II) in square planar coordination by the nitrogen atoms of the macrocycle, in N-configuration III, with Ni–N_mean = 1.96(2) Å. The six-membered chelate rings both have chair conformations, with the phenyl substituents equatorially oriented and with the methyl substituents disordered over axial and equatorial orientations. The S = 3 compound cis-1SR,4SR,5SR,7RS,8SR,11SR,12SR,14SR-[Ni(rmL²)(acac)]ClO₄ has N-configuration V. The macrocycle is folded along N¹–Ni–N⁸, adjacent to the phenyl substituents {N1–Ni–N8 = 176.45(6), N4–Ni–N11 = 98.16(6)°}, with mean Ni–N = 2.09(2) Å and mean Ni–O = 2.121(5) Å. Both six-membered chelate rings have chair conformations with the methyl substituents equatorially oriented, while one has the phenyl substituent equatorially and the other has it axially oriented. The structures of the isomeric [M(rmL²)(acac)]ClO₄, [M(rrL²)(acac)]CIO₄ and [M(mmL²)(acac)]ClO₄ compounds are compared.     

The influence of sulfur substituents on the molecular geometry and packing of thio derivatives of N‐methylphenobarbital

The room‐temperature crystal structures of four new thio derivatives of N‐methylphenobarbital [systematic name: 5‐ethyl‐1‐methyl‐5‐phenylpyrimidine‐2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)‐trione], C₁₃H₁₄N₂O₃, are compared with the structure of the parent compound. The sulfur substituents in N‐methyl‐2‐thiophenobarbital [5‐ethyl‐1‐methyl‐5‐phenyl‐2‐thioxo‐1,2‐dihydropyrimidine‐4,6(3H,5H)‐dione], C₁₃H₁₄N₂O₂S, N‐methyl‐4‐thiophenobarbital [5‐ethyl‐1‐methyl‐5‐phenyl‐4‐thioxo‐3,4‐dihydropyrimidine‐2,6(1H,5H)‐dione], C₁₃H₁₄N₂O₂S, and N‐methyl‐2,4,6‐trithiophenobarbital [5‐ethyl‐1‐methyl‐5‐phenylpyrimidine‐2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)‐trithione], C₁₃H₁₄N₂S₃, preserve the heterocyclic ring puckering observed for N‐methylphenobarbital (a half‐chair conformation), whereas in N‐methyl‐2,4‐dithiophenobarbital [5‐ethyl‐1‐methyl‐5‐phenyl‐2,4‐dithioxo‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐6(5H)‐one], C₁₃H₁₄N₂OS₂, significant flattening of the ring was detected. The number and positions of the sulfur substituents influence the packing and hydrogen‐bonding patterns of the derivatives. In the cases of the 2‐thio, 4‐thio and 2,4,6‐trithio derivatives, there is a preference for the formation of a ring motif of the R₂²(8) type, which is also a characteristic of N‐methylphenobarbital, whereas a C(6) chain forms in the 2,4‐dithio derivative. The preferences for hydrogen‐bond formation, which follow the sequence of acceptor position 4 > 2 > 6, confirm the differences in the nucleophilic properties of the C atoms of the heterocyclic ring and are consistent with the course of N‐methylphenobarbital thionation reactions.     

Synthesis,Structure, Spectroscopic,and Electrochemical Properties of Highly Fluorescent Phosphorus(V)–meso‐Triarylcorroles

The synthesis, spectroscopic, and electrochemical properties of seven new P^V–meso‐triarylcorroles ( 1 – 7 ) are reported. Compounds 1 – 7 were prepared by heating the corresponding free‐base corroles with POCl₃ at reflux in pyridine. Hexacoordinate P^V complexes of meso‐triarylcorroles were isolated that contained two axial hydroxy groups, unlike the P^V complex of 8,12‐diethyl‐2,3,7,13,17,18‐hexamethylcorrole, which was pentacoordinate, or the P^V complex of meso‐tetraphenylporphyrin, which was hexacoordinate with two axial chloro groups. ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy in CDCl₃ indicated that the hexacoordinated P^V–meso‐triarylcorroles were prone to axial‐ligand dissociation to form pentacoordinated P^V–meso‐triarylcorroles. However, in the presence of strongly coordinating solvents, such as CH₃OH, THF, and DMSO, the P^V–meso‐triarylcorroles preferred to exist in a hexacoordinated geometry in which the corresponding solvent molecules acted as axial ligands. X‐ray diffraction of two complexes confirmed the hexacoordination environment for P^V–meso‐triarylcorroles. Their absorption spectra in two coordinating solvents revealed that P^V–meso‐triarylcorroles showed a strong band at about 600 nm together with other bands, in contrast to P^V–porphyrins, which showed weak bands in the visible region. These compounds were easier to oxidize and more difficult to reduce compared to P^V–porphyrins. These compounds were brightly fluorescent, unlike the weakly fluorescent P^V–porphyrins, and the quantum yields for selected P^V–corroles were as high as Al^III and Ga^III corroles, which are the best known fluorescent compounds among oligopyrrolic macrocycles.