16‐(4‐Cyano­benzyl­idene)‐17‐oxo­androst‐5‐en‐3β‐ol

In the title compound, 4‐(3β‐hydroxy‐17‐oxoandrost‐5‐en‐16‐ylidenemethyl)benzonitrile, C₂₇H₃₁NO₂, rings A and C of the steroid nucleus are in chair conformations. The central six‐membered ring B is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation, while the five‐membered ring D adopts a 13β,14α‐half‐chair conformation. The cyano­benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group at position C17. The dihedral angle between the planes of the steroid nucleus and the cyano­benzyl­idene moiety is 22.61 (15)°. Intermolecular O—H⃛N hydrogen bonds formed between the hydroxyl group of the steroid and the N atom of the cyano­benzyl­idene moiety of symmetry‐related mol­ecules link the steroid mol­ecules into chains which run parallel to the b axis.     

1‐(2‐{4‐[6‐Hydro­xy‐2‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­benzo­[b]­thiol‐3‐yl­carbonyl]­phenoxy}ethyl)­piperidinium chloride

The title compound, raloxifene hydro­chloride, C₂₈H₂₈NO₄S⁺·Cl^?, belongs to the benzo­thio­phene class of antiosteoporotic drugs. In the molecular cation, the 2‐phenol ring sustains a dihedral angle of 45.3 (1)° relative to the benzo­[b]­thio­phene system. The benzo­[b]­thio­phene and phenyl ring planes are twisted with respect to the carbonyl plane, with the smallest twist component occurring between the phenyl and carbonyl planes. The N atom bears the positive charge in the molecular cation and the piperidine ring adopts an almost perfect chair conformation. The Cl^? anion is involved in the formation of N—H?Cl and O—H?Cl intermolecular hydrogen bonds, which lead to the formation of a layer of molecular cations.     

N,N′‐Bis­[1‐(pyrazin‐2‐yl)­ethyl­idene]­hydrazine

Molecules of the title compound, C₁₂H₁₂N₆, contain both a di­imine linkage and an N—N bond, and assume a planar structure. The compound lies about an inversion centre and there are three intramolecular C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds.     

16α,17α‐Epoxy‐20‐oxopregn‐5‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

The title compound, C₂₃H₃₂O₄, has a 3β configuration, with the epoxy O atom at 16α,17α. Rings A and C have slightly distorted chair conformations. Because of the presence of the C5=C6 double bond, ring B assumes an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation slightly distorted towards an 8β‐sofa. Ring D has a conformation close to a 14α‐envelope. The acetoxy and acetyl substituents are twisted with respect to the average molecular plane of the steroid. The conformation of the mol­ecule is compared with that given by a quantum chemistry calculation using the RHF–AM1 (RHF = Roothaan Hartree–Fock) Hamiltonian model. Cohesion of the crystal can be attributed to van der Waals interactions and weak intermolecular C—H?O interactions, which link the mol­ecules head‐to‐tail along [101].     

16‐(4‐Cyanobenzylidene)‐3β‐pyrrolidinoandrost‐5‐en‐17β‐ol monohydrate

In the title compound, C₃₁H₄₀N₂O·H₂O, the outer two six‐membered rings are in chair conformations, while the central ring is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation. The five‐membered ring adopts a 13β‐envelope conformation and the cyano­benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the hydroxyl group at position 17. The steroid nuclei are linked by intermolecular O—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds to form a molecular network. The molecular packing has an interesting feature, with the steroids aligned parallel to the b axis, forming a closed loop through hydrogen bonds linked via water mol­ecules.     

17‐Oxo‐16‐(2‐pyridyl­methyl­ene)­androst‐5‐en‐3β‐ol monohydrate

The title compound, C₂₅H₃₁NO₂·H₂O, has the outer two six‐membered rings in chair conformations, while the central ring is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation. The five‐membered ring adopts a 13,14‐half‐chair conformation. The pyridyl­methyl­ene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group at position 17. The structure is stabilized by intermolecular O—H?N and O—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

17‐Oxo‐5α‐androst‐6‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

In the title compound, C₂₁H₃₀O₃, a potential inhibitor of aromatase, all rings are fused trans. Rings A and C have chair conformations which are slightly flattened, whereas the conformation of ring B is close to a half‐chair. Ring D has a 14α‐envelope conformation. The steroid nucleus has a small twist, as shown by the C19—C10⋯C13—C18 (steroid numbering) torsion angle of −6.9 (3)°. Ab initio calculations of the equilibrium geometry of the mol­ecule reproduce this small twist, which appears to be due to the conformation of ring B rather than to packing effects.     

2′‐(4‐Fluoro­phenyl)‐[1,2,3]­triazolo[4′,5′:16,17]­androst‐5‐en‐3β‐ol methanol hemisolvate

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₂₅H₃₀FN₃O·0.5CH₃OH, contains four symmetry‐independent steroid and two methanol mol­ecules. The conformations of the independent steroid mol­ecules are very similar. Intermolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds create two independent chains, each of which links two of the independent steroid mol­ecules plus one methanol mol­ecule via a co‐operative O—H⋯O—H⋯O—H pattern. Intermolecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯F interactions are also observed.     

4‐[Bis(1,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl­meth­yl)­amino]phenol monohydrate

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₈H₂₃N₅O·H₂O, shows mol­ecules containing a phenol group linked perpendicularly to a roughly planar fragment comprising two pyrazole rings. Mol­ecules are stacked perpendicular to the [101] direction, with their phenol groups disposed alternately. The mol­ecular packing in the crystal is stabilized by hydrogen bonding involving water mol­ecules.     

N‐(4‐Methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐N′‐(2‐pyridyl)­hydrazine

Molecules of the title compound (alternative name p‐methoxybenzaldehyde 2‐pyridyl­hydrazone), C₁₃H₁₃N₃O, adopt an E configuration about the azomethine C=N double bond. Molecules are almost planar, the dihedral angle between the pyridine and methoxy­phenyl rings being only 6.19 (12)°. Pairwise N—H⃛N hydrogen bonds [R(8) in graph‐set notation] link centrosymmetrically related mol­ecules into discrete pairs.     

Tri­benzyl{η5‐[2‐(p‐tolyl)­prop‐2‐yl]­cyclo­penta­dienyl}­zirconium

The title compound, [Zr(C₇H₇)₃(C₁₅H₁₇)], (I), crystallizes from light petroleum with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. Whereas in the parent mol­ecule, Zr(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CH₂Ph)₃, all three Zr—CH₂Ph angles are equal, in (I), they differ significantly. In spite of their different environments, both independent mol­ecules in (I) exhibit a small, an expected, and a large Zr—CH₂Ph angle. The angles are similar to those of the closely related tri­benzyl­[η⁵‐(benzyl­di­methyl­silyl)­cyclo­penta­dienyl]­zirconium complex. The smallest Zr—CH₂Ph angle and the consequently relatively short Zr?C_ipso distance are indicative of η²‐bonding of the benzyl group.     

16‐(4‐Iso­propyl­benzyl­idene)­androst‐4‐ene‐3,17‐dione

In the title compound, C₂₉H₃₆O₂, the outer cyclohexene ring of the steroid nucleus has a conformation that lies about half‐way between a half‐chair and an envelope, while the central and outer cyclo­hexane rings of the steroid nucleus have slightly distorted chair conformations. The steroidal cyclo­pentane ring adopts a 13β,14α‐half‐chair conformation. The benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group on the cyclo­pentane ring. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the steroid nucleus and the benzyl­idene moiety is 35.54 (9)°. The packing of the mol­ecules is assumed to be dictated mainly by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O interactions.     

tert‐Butyl 2‐[2‐(ethoxy­carbo­thio­yl­amino)‐3‐pyridyl­oxy]acetate and tert‐butyl 2‐(3‐thio­xopyrido­[2,1‐c][1,2,4]thia­diazol‐8‐yl­oxy)­acetate

Compounds (I), C₁₄H₂₀N₂O₄S, and (II), C₁₂H₁₄N₂O₃S₂, are two minor products of the same reaction. Both structures contain identical ester functionalities in similar orientations. Both independent mol­ecules of (I) contain an ethoxy­carbo­thio­yl­amine moiety, whilst (II) possesses a novel exocyclic thione system fused with a pyridine ring.     

3,6‐Di­chloro‐4‐[2‐(4‐thia­morpholino)­ethanesulfanyl]­pyridazine and 3,6‐bis­(pyrazol‐1‐yl)‐4‐[2‐(4‐thia­mor­pho­lino)­ethanesulfanyl]­pyridazine

The trans–trans conformations adopted by the derivatized bis­(bidentate) chelating N₄‐donor ligand 3,6‐bis­(pyrazol‐1‐yl)‐4‐[2‐(4‐thia­morpholino)­ethanesulfanyl]­pyridazine, C₁₆H₁₉N₇S₂, and an intermediate in its formation, 3,6‐di­chloro‐4‐[2‐(4‐thia­morpholino)­ethanesulfanyl]­pyridazine, C₁₀H₁₃Cl₂N₃S₂, con­trast with the cis–cis conformation found previously for 3,6‐bis­(thio­phen‐2‐yl)­pyridazine [Ackers, Blake, Hill & Hubberstey (2002). Acta Cryst. C 58 , o640–o641], which places all four heteroatoms on the same side of the mol­ecule.     

Tris­[2‐(2‐oxazolin‐2‐yl)­phenolato]­iron(III)

The title compound, tris­[2‐(4,5‐dihydrooxazol‐2‐yl‐κN)phenolato‐κO]­iron(III), [Fe(C₉H₈NO₂)₃], is disordered over a non‐crystallographic twofold rotation axis perpendicular to the crystallographic threefold rotation axis. The disorder can be a pure rotational disorder of an iron complex in the facial configuration, or the consequence of a mixture of facial and meridional configurations. In the latter case, at least 25% of the iron complexes must adopt the facial configuration in order to obtain the disorder ratio observed in the crystal.     

3‐[4‐(4‐Fluoro­phenyl)­piperazin‐1‐yl­methyl]‐5‐methyl‐1,3‐benzoxazol‐2(3H)‐one and 3‐[4‐(2‐fluoro­phenyl)­piperazin‐1‐yl­methyl]‐5‐methyl‐1,3‐benzoxazol‐2(3H)‐one

The title compounds, both C₁₉H₂₀FN₃O₂, contain essentially planar benzoxazolinone ring systems, within which the C—N bond distances and angles do not differ significantly between the two compounds. In both cases, the piperazine ring adopts an almost perfect chair conformation and the benzoxazo­l­inone ring system lies nearly perpendicular to it. The structures contain intermolecular C—H⋯O contacts, and the interactions between the benzoxazolinone and fluoro­phenyl­piperazine portions of the mol­ecules are segregated.     

16‐Cyano‐13α‐(5‐methyl‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazol‐2‐yl)‐13,16‐seco‐17‐nor­androst‐5‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

In the title compound, C₂₃H₃₁N₃O₃, the outer cyclo­hexane rings have chair conformations, while the central cyclohexene ring adopts a half‐chair conformation. In the solid state, intra‐ and intermolecular C—H⋯N interactions are observed.     

3,5‐Bis­[4‐(diethyl­amino)­benzyl­idene]‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone and 3,5‐bis[4‐(diethyl­amino)­cinnamyl­idene]‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone: prospective biophotonic materials

The structures of 3,5‐bis­[4‐(diethyl­amino)­benzyl­idene]‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone, C₂₈H₃₇N₃O, (I), and 3,5‐bis­[4‐(diethyl­amino)­cinnamyl­idene]‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone, C₃₂H₄₁N₃O, (II), have been characterized. Because of conjugation between donor and acceptor parts, the central heterocycles (including the carbonyl group) in (I) and (II) are flattened and exhibit a `sofa' conformation, with a deviation of the N atom from the planar fragment. The dihedral angles between the planar part of the heterocycle and the two almost flat fragments that include a phenyl ring and bridging atoms are 23.2 (1) and 11.2 (1)° in (I), and 11.8 (1) and 8.7 (2)° in (II). One‐ and two‐photon absorption of light and the fluorescence of (I) and (II) have also been characterized.     

{(E)‐ and {(Z)‐2‐[α,β‐bis­(methoxy­carbonyl)­vinyl]­cyclo­pentadien‐1‐yl­idene}tri­phenyl­phospho­rane

The Ramirez yl­ide undergoes electrophilic substitution with di­alkyl acetyl­ene­di­carboxyl­ates, yielding a mixture of the Z and E adducts. The crystal structure analyses of the two adducts formed using di­methyl­acetyl­ene, viz. di­methyl (E)‐ and (Z)‐1‐[2‐(tri­phenyl­phospho­ranyl­idene)­cyclo­pentadien‐1‐yl]­ethyl­ene­di­carboxyl­ate, both C₂₉H₂₅O₄P, explain an unusual chemical shift observed for the vinyl H atom of the Z adduct, which had previously precluded a definitive assignment of the isomers. In addition, the structures explain why only one of the isomers reacts further with acetyl­ene esters to produce azulenes with a rare substitution pattern.     

Bis­[S‐methyl 3‐(2‐bromo­benzyl­idene)­di­thio­cab­aza­to‐N3,S]­platinum(II)

The Schiff base ligand in the title complex, [Pt(C₉H₈BrN₂S₂)₂], is deprotonated from its tautomeric thiol form and coordinated to Pt^IIvia the mercapto S and β–N atoms. The configuration about Pt^II is a perfect square‐planar, with two equivalent Pt—N [2.023 (3) Å] and Pt—S [2.293 (1) Å] bonds. The phenyl ring is twisted against the coordination moiety Pt1/N1/N1′/S2′/S2 by 31.8 (2)°, due to the steric hindrance induced by ortho‐substituted bulky Br atom.