Chloro­bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine)­nickel(I) tetra­hydro­furan solvate and an unsolvated trigonal phase of chloro­tris­(tri­phenyl­phosphine)­nickel(I)

In [NiCl(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂]·C₄H₈O, the Ni atom is coordinated by three ligands in a distorted trigonal–planar configuration, with a P—Ni—P angle of 111.52 (2)°. In [NiCl(C₁₈H₁₅P)₃], there are three independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, with each Ni—Cl bond on a crystallographic threefold rotation axis. Each Ni centre is tetrahedrally bound. The Ni atoms in both compounds have a d⁹ configuration and a formal oxidation state of Ni^I. A comparison is made between the form of [NiCl(PPh₃)₃] presented here and that of a known toluene solvate.     

trans‐Chloro­(methyl)­bis­(tri­cyclo­hexyl­phosphine)­platinum(II)

The crystal structure of the title compound, [PtCl(CH₃)(C₁₈H₃₃P)₂], is isostructural with various platinum(II) and palladium(II) complexes containing two bulky tri­cyclo­hexyl­phosphine ligands in a trans orientation. The Pt atom resides on an inversion centre, resulting in a 50% statistical disorder in the chloro and methyl positions. The most significant geometrical parameters are Pt—P 2.3431 (8), Pt—­Cl 2.440 (4) and Pt—C1 2.179 (13) Å, and P—Pt—P 180, P—Pt—Cl 89.15 (12) and 90.85 (12), and C—Pt—Cl 172.7 (5)°. The effective and Tolman cone angles for the tricyclohexylphosphine ligands were calculated as 160 and 162°, respectively.     

Trigonal–planar silver coordination in (3,5‐di­nitro­benzoato)­bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine)­silver(I)

The three‐coordinate Ag atom in the title compound, [Ag(C₇H₃N₂O₆)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], shows trigonal–planar coordination [P—Ag—P = 147.1 (1)° and Σ_Ag = 359.0 (3)°]. Adjacent mol­ecules are linked through the O atoms of adjacent nitro groups [Ag?O = 3.205 (3) and 3.302 (4) Å] into a zigzag chain running parallel to the c axis.     

Tetrakis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine)silver(I) tetra­phenyl­borate aceto­nitrile solvate

In the title compound, [Ag{P(C₆H₅)}₄][B{P(C₆H₅)}₄]·CH₃CN, the Ag ion resides on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis and is tetrahedrally coordinated. There is a disparity between the two independent Ag—P distances. This is due, in part, to the temperature differences (all previous determinations are at room temperature) but also to the packing effects of various anions.     

Bis­[bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino­methyl)­phenyl­phosphine]­di­chloro­tetra­gold(I) bis­[chloro­tris­(penta­fluoro­phenyl)­aurate(III)]

The cation of the title compound, [Au₄(PPh₂CH₂PPhCH₂PPh₂)₂Cl₂][Au(C₆F₅)₃Cl]₂ or [Au₄Cl₂(C₃₂H₂₉P₃)₂][AuCl(C₆F₅)₃]₂, displays a rhomboidal geometry for the Au atoms, with short Au?Au distances of 3.104 (2) and 3.185 (1) Å; the linear coordination at the Au^I atoms is distorted: P—Au—P 164.7 (2)° and P—Au—Cl 170.67 (11)°. The anion shows the expected square‐planar geometry at Au^III, with the Au atom 0.022 (5) Å out of the plane of the four donor atoms.     

[N,N‐Bis(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)­di­thio­car­bamato‐S]­bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐P)­copper(I) tri­phenyl­phosphine solvate

In the title compound, [Cu(C₅H₁₀NO₂S₂)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂]·C₁₈H₁₅P, the Cu atom is in a distorted tetrahedral coordination, with two tri­phenyl­phosphine P atoms and two S atoms from an N,N‐bis(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)­di­thio­carbamate ligand occupying the vertices. The crystal structure is characterized by alternate layers of complex and tri­phenyl­phosphine mol­ecules.     

Aqua­bis­(benzo­nitrile)(o‐benzo­quin­one di­imine)(tri­phenyl­phosphine)­ruthenium(II) bis­(tetra­fluoro­borate) hydrate

The Ru atom in the title compound, [Ru(C₆H₅CN)₂{P(C₆H₅)₃}{C₆H₄(NH)₂}(H₂O)](BF₄)₂·H₂O, has six‐coordinate octahedral geometry, with a trans arrangement of the tri­phenyl­phosphine ligand and the water mol­ecule. The asymmetric unit contains one complex cation, two tetra­fluoro­borate anions and one solvent water mol­ecule, which is disordered over two sites (ratio of occupancies 0.70:0.30).     

trans‐Di­chloro­bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐P)­platinum(II)

Two different crystals (A and B) were used to structurally characterize trans‐[PtCl₂(PPh₃)₂] and to study random and systematic errors in derived parameters. The compound is isomorphous with trans‐[PdCl₂(PPh₃)₂] and with one of the polymorphs of trans‐[PtMeCl(PPh₃)₂] reported previously. Half‐normal probability plot analyses based on A and B show realistic s.u.'s and negligible systematic errors. R.m.s. calculations give very good agreement between A and B, 0.0088 Å. Important geometrical parameters are Pt—P = 2.3163 (11) Å, Pt—Cl = 2.2997 (11) Å, P—Pt—Cl = 87.88 (4) and 92.12 (4)°. Half‐normal probability plots and r.m.s. calculations were also used to compare the title compound with the palladium analogue, showing small systematic differences between the compounds. The torsion angles around the Pt—P bond were found to be very similar to those reported for isomorphous complexes, as well as to the torsion angles around the Pt—As bond in trans‐[PtCl₂(AsPh₃)₂]. The NMR coupling constants for the title compound are similar to Pt—P coupling constants reported for analogous trans complexes.     

Triclinic polymorphs of tri­phenyl­phosphine and tri­phenyl­phosphine sulfide

New triclinic polymorphs of tri­phenyl­phosphine, (I), and tri­phenyl­phosphine sulfide, (II), were crystallized. For the structure of (I), it is obvious that the highest peaks in the final difference electron‐density map are located at the `lone‐pair regions' of P atoms. We have observed this effect in two further phosphorous‐containing structures.     

Aqua­bis­(crotonato)­bis­(pyridine)­copper(II)

The title compound, [Cu(O₂CCH=CHCH₃)₂(C₅H₅N)₂(H₂O)], crystallizes as a monomer, with the copper ion in a pentacoordinated square‐pyramidal environment, bisected by a twofold axis passing through the metal atom and the apex. The mol­ecules organise in chains connected by hydrogen bonds running along the unique b axis.     

cis‐Di­chloro­(di­methyl­aminomethyl­ene)­(tri­phenyl­phosphine)palladium(II) acetone solvate

The synthesis and X‐ray structural analysis of the title compound, [PdCl₂(C₃H₇N)(C₁₈H₁₅P)]·C₃H₆O, are described. The crystal structure contains discrete monomeric mol­ecules of the carbene complex and solvent mol­ecules separated by normal van der Waals distances. The Pd atom is four‐coordinate in an essentially square‐planar environment, with the chlorine ligands mutually cis; Pd—P = 2.2495 (7), Pd—Cl = 2.3508 (7) and 2.3600 (7), Pd—C 1.948 (2) and N—C(carbene) 1.274 (3) Å.     

The trans influence in mer‐tri­chloro­nitridobis­(tri­phenyl­arsine)­ruthenium(VI)

The title compound, mer‐[RuCl₃N(C₁₈H₁₅As)₂], is the first structurally characterized example of a nitride complex in which ruthenium is six‐coordinated to monodentate ligands only. The Ru[triple‐bond]N bond length [1.6161 (15) Å] is relatively long, and the trans influence of the nitride ligand is reflected by the difference between the Ru—Cl_trans and Ru—Cl_cis bond lengths [0.1234 (4) Å]. The N—Ru—Cl_trans axis is sited on a twofold axis.     

Rubidium bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonyl)­imidate dioxane disolvate

The bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonyl)­imidate anion crystallizes with Rb as the title dioxane 1:2 solvate, Rb⁺·CF₃SO₂NSO₂CF₃⁻·2C₄H₈O₂, with the anion in a transoid conformation, as opposed to the cisoid form typically seen when there are significant cation–anion interactions. The Rb^I cation is eight‐coordinate, interacting with one anion in a chelating fashion and with two other anions through the remaining sulfonyl O atoms. The latter interactions link ion pairs through the formation of Rb₂O₂ dimers about inversion centers at (0, , 0) and (, , 0), forming extended columns which run parallel to the a axis of the unit cell. Rb–dioxane bridges crosslink these salt columns in the (010), (001) and (011) directions, resulting in a three‐dimensional network solid. One dioxane solvent mol­ecule is disordered over two half‐occupancy sites.     

Hydro­gen bonding in bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐P)­iminium hydrogen­sulfate chloro­form solvate

The title compound, C₃₆H₃₀NP₂⁺·HSO₄^?·CHCl₃, consists of discrete ions and well separated chloroform solvate molecules. The central feature of the structure is O—H?O hydrogen bonding between two hydrogensulfate ions related by a crystallographic inversion centre. The chloroform solvate molecule takes part in a well defined C—H?O hydrogen bond.     

trans‐Bis­(diethano­lamine)­bis­(iso­thio­cyanato)­nickel(II)

In the neutral title complex, trans‐bis(2,2′‐imino­di­ethanol‐N,O)­bis­(iso­thio­cyanato)­nickel(II), [Ni(NCS)₂(C₄H₁₁NO₂)₂], the iso­thio­cyanate ions and the di­ethanol­amine mol­ecules act as mono­dentate and bi­dentate ligands, respectively. The Ni^II ion exhibits a distorted octahedral configuration with crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry and N_NCS—Ni—N_amine and N_NCS—Ni—O_amine bond angles of 88.78 (10) and 89.44 (10)°, respectively. The Ni—N bond distances are in the range 2.069 (3)–2.096 (2) Å. The mol­ecules are linked by hydrogen bonds to form a three‐dimensional infinite lattice.     

trans‐(Methanol)(methyl­di­phenyl­phosphine)­bis­(pentane‐2,4‐dionato)­cobalt(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate hydrate

The title compound [Co(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₁₃H₁₃P)(CH₄O)]PF₆·H₂O, (I), which was converted from trans‐[Co(acac)₂(PMePh₂)(H₂O)]PF₆ (acac is pentane‐2,4‐dionato) by recrystallization from aqueous methanol, has been confirmed as have a coordinated methanol ligand. The molecular structure of the complex cation, trans‐[Co(acac)₂(PMePh₂)(MeOH)]⁺, is similar to that of the above aqua complex found in the ClO₄ salt [Kashiwabara et al. (1995). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 68 , 883–888]. The Co—O bond length for the coordinated methanol is 2.059 (3) Å. There is an intermolecular hydrogen bond between the OH group of the coordinated methanol and one of the O atoms of the acac ligands in an adjacent complex cation [O5?O3′ = 2.914 (4) Å], giving a centrosymmetric dimeric dicationic complex.     

trans‐(2‐Methyl­thio­benzoato‐O)phenylbis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine)­palladium(II), two conformational isomers

The title compound, trans‐[Pd(C₆H₅)(C₈H₇O₂S)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], crystallizes in two modifications differing only in the orientation of the 2‐methyl­thio­benzoato ligand. In both cases, this ligand binds to the metal centre via one O atom in a monodentate fashion. The only significant difference is a rotation about the C(Ph)—COO bond, with O—C—C—C torsion angles having values of 6.3 (7) and 157.3 (3)° in the two isomeric forms.     

Polymeric bis­(glycolato)­cobalt(II)

In the title compound, poly­[cobalt(II)‐bis(μ‐hydroxy­acetato‐O¹,O²:O^1′)], [Co(C₂H₃O₃)₂]_n, units of [Co(C₂H₃O₃)₂] constitute a bidimensional sheet coordination polymer in which each Co^II atom lies on an inversion centre and is octahedrally coordinated to glycolate ligands in a trans configuration. Carbonyl O atoms from adjacent units complete the octahedral environment.     

(N,N‐Di­iso­propyl­di­thio­carbamato‐S,S′)­bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐P)­gold(I) butane solvate

In the crystal structure of the title complex, [Au(C₇H₁₄NS₂)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂]·C₄H₁₀, the Au atom is in a distorted tetra­hedral environment consisting of the two P atoms of the tri­phenyl­phosphine ligands and the two S atoms of the diiso­propyl­thio­carbamate ligand. The molecular structure and packing are stablized by van der Waals interactions.     

N‐(p‐Chloro­benzyl­idene)­phenyl­amine N‐oxide

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₃H₁₀ClNO, confirms that it exists as a nitro­ne. The geometry about C=N is Z. The relevant torsion angles indicate trans and cis conformations around the nitro­ne bond.