9‐(2‐Chloro­ethyl­amino)­acridine monohydrate and its precursor 9‐phenoxy­acridine

The title compounds, C₁₅H₁₃ClN₂·H₂O, (I), and C₁₉H₁₃NO, (II), form monoclinic crystals. Arranged in a `head‐to‐tail' manner, the mol­ecules of the amine form (I) lie along the b axis in layers that are linked by a network of hydrogen bonds involving the endocyclic N atom, the H atom at the exocyclic N atom and all the atoms of the solvent water mol­ecule. Molecules of (II), with the phenoxy group nearly perpendicular to the acridine moiety, are arranged in pairs related by a center of symmetry and stabilized via two C—H⋯N contacts; the latter are linked via a network of further C—H⋯N contacts and non‐specific dispersive interactions.     

1,3,5‐Tris­(chloro­methyl)­benzene

The title compound, C₉H₉Cl₃, is being used as a platform for new tripodal receptors. Two mol­ecules make up the asymmetric unit; weak intermolecular hydrogen bonding is observed between methyl­ene H atoms and the chlorine of an adjacent mol­ecule. There are also C—H?π interactions.     

Tri­carbonyl(η6‐chloro­benzene)­chromium

The title compound, [Cr(C₆H₅Cl)(CO)₃], is the first group 6 tri­carbonyl ­η⁶‐monohaloarene compound to be structurally characterized. It adopts a classic piano‐stool structure, with the Cr(CO)₃ tripod assuming a syn‐eclipsed conformation relative to the arene ring (ϕ = 2.0°). The extended structure is dominated by intermolecular π⃛H interactions (H⃛ring centroid = 2.94 Å) and non‐classical hydrogen bonds between carbonyl and arene moieties (O⃛H = 2.50–2.58 Å).     

[4‐(Tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]­aceto­nitrile

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₉H₆F₃N, at 123 K contains mol­ecules linked together via several C—H?F and C—H?N contacts, the strongest of which are 2.58 and 2.65 Å, respectively. Apparently, an F atom in the CF₃ group is able to compete with a cyano N atom for aromatic H atoms but is less prone to interact with the more acidic methyl­ene H atoms. The Ph–CH₂CN torsion angle is ?6.4 (2)° and the planar phenyl ring exhibits a typical deformation of the endo angles at the ipso‐C atoms, due to the difference in the electron‐withdrawing power of the CF₃ and CH₂CN substituents.     

2‐[Benzoyl­(hydroxy­imino)­methyl­amino]­benzoic acid

The structure of the title compound, C₁₅H₁₂N₂O₄, consists of a polymeric arrangement, around inversion centres, of mol­ecules linked through O—H⋯N and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds; there are also intramolecular hydrogen bonds. All these hydrogen‐bond interactions result in the formation of infinite chains parallel to the [010] direction. The oxime group has an E conformation.     

mer‐Tri­chloro­tris(1,3‐thia­zole‐N)­ruthenium(III)

The potentially cytostatic title compound, mer‐[RuCl₃(C₃H₃NS)₃], is the first Ru^III–thz (thz is 1,3‐thia­zole) complex characterized via X‐ray diffraction and consists of discrete complex mol­ecules with an octahedral coordination sphere in which the metal centre is linked to three chloride ions and to three thz ligands through the N atoms. The Ru—Cl and Ru—N bond distances average 2.3462 (6) and 2.0851 (19) Å, respectively.     

1,1‐Di(9‐fluorenyl)­ethanol,a ­by‐­product from the acetyl­ation of 9‐fluorenyl­lithium

Treatment of 9‐fluorenyl­lithium with acetyl chloride produces 9‐acetyl­fluorene, (I), and several by‐products. Among them is a compound unequivocally identified for the first time as the addition product of (I) with 9‐fluorenyl­lithium, 1,1‐di(9‐fluorenyl)­ethanol, C₂₈H₂₂O, (II). The two fluorene‐ring planes of (II) are essentially perpendicular [89.90 (9)°]. A number of intermolecular non‐bonding distances are well within or close to the sum of their respective van der Waals radii and may be responsible for the rarely observed large bowing of one of the fluorene rings. This bowing apparently arises from two mol­ecules impinging on the convex face of the bowed ring, augmented by hydrogen bonding between the peripheral π electrons of the concave face and the hydroxyl H atom of another mol­ecule adjacent to that face.     

N‐(Tri­phenyl­methyl­sulfanyl)­phthal­imide

The title compound, C₂₇H₁₉NO₂S, contains chains of fused (19) rings formed by intermolecular C—H·O=C hydrogen bonds and running along the [011] and [01] directions. These chains are linked through short intermol­ecular C—H·π contacts, giving rise to sheets. The conformation of the title compound is dominated primarily by the nearly orthogonal lone‐pair orbitals on the N and S atoms.     

1,1‐Di(9‐fluorenyl)­ethyl acetate,a by‐­product from the acetyl­ation of 9‐fluorenyl­lithium

The preparation of sp‐9‐acetyl­fluorene from the reaction of 9‐­fluorenyl­lithium with acetyl chloride also provided 9‐(1‐acetoxy­ethyl­idene)­fluorene (`di­acetyl­fluorene') and 1,1‐di(9‐fluorenyl)­ethanol, (II), as by‐products recently characterized by X‐ray analysis. A third by‐product, 1,1‐di(9‐fluorenyl)­ethyl acetate, (III), C₃₀H₂₄O₂, has now been unequivocally identified for the first time, and emanates from the acetyl­ation of the oxy­anion of (II). In the asymmetric unit, compound (III) exists as two almost identical structures which differ slightly, but significantly, in conformation. Neither possesses the significant fluorene‐ring bowing or the perpendicularity of the two ring planes exhibited by (II). The angle between the least‐squares planes of the two fluorene rings of (III) is 58.45 (9) and 60.95 (10)°, respectively, for the two conformations, and their corresponding bonding parameters also differ slightly in a number of instances.     

(E,E,E)‐1,3,5‐Tris[4‐(acetyl­sulfan­yl)­styr­yl]­benzene toluene hemisolvate

The first crystal structure of a three‐terminal sulfur end‐capped oligo­phenyl­ene­vinyl­ene, C₃₆H₃₀O₃S₃·0.5C₇H₈, has been determined at 122 (1) K. The mol­ecular threefold symmetry is not utilized in the crystal structure. It is confirmed that the double bonds have been fully transformed into a trans configuration by iodine treatment.     

1‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene

Two chemical isomers of 3‐nitro­benzotrifluoride, namely 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene, C₁₃H₇ClF₃NO₂S, (I), and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene, C₁₃H₇ClF₃NO₂S, (II), have been prepared and their crystal structures determined with the specific purpose of forming a cocrystal of the two. The two compounds display a similar conformation, with dihedral angles between the benzene rings of 83.1 (1) and 76.2 (1)°, respectively, but (I) packs in P while (II) packs in P2₁/c, with C—H⋯O interactions. No cocrystal could be formed, and it is suggested that the C—H⋯O associations in (II) prevent intermolecular mixing and promote phase separation.     

Tri­benzyl{η5‐[2‐(p‐tolyl)­prop‐2‐yl]­cyclo­penta­dienyl}­zirconium

The title compound, [Zr(C₇H₇)₃(C₁₅H₁₇)], (I), crystallizes from light petroleum with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. Whereas in the parent mol­ecule, Zr(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CH₂Ph)₃, all three Zr—CH₂Ph angles are equal, in (I), they differ significantly. In spite of their different environments, both independent mol­ecules in (I) exhibit a small, an expected, and a large Zr—CH₂Ph angle. The angles are similar to those of the closely related tri­benzyl­[η⁵‐(benzyl­di­methyl­silyl)­cyclo­penta­dienyl]­zirconium complex. The smallest Zr—CH₂Ph angle and the consequently relatively short Zr?C_ipso distance are indicative of η²‐bonding of the benzyl group.     

sp‐9‐(o‐Methyl­phenyl)­fluorene

While the barriers of rotation of the sp and ap rotamers of 9‐(o‐methyl­phenyl)­fluorene, C₂₀H₁₆, are sufficiently similar to permit them to equilibrate, both being observed (NMR) in solution, crystallization provides the sp rotamer, (I), exclusively. Although in the sp conformation the intramolecular distance between adjacent C atoms of the phenyl and fluorene rings is small [3.382 (4) Å, within 0.02 Å of the sum of the van der Waals radii], in the ap conformation the distance between the adjacent o‐CH₃ group on the phenyl ring and C atom of the fluorene ring would be much closer, based on that exhibited in the crystalline ap progenitor 9‐(o‐methyl­phenyl)‐9‐fluorenol. The angle between the fluorene and 9‐aryl planes of (I) is 75.82 (10)°.     

1,1′‐(Ethenyl­idene)bis­(4‐chloro­benzene)

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₀Cl₂, crystallizes as colourless prisms with two symmetry‐independent mol­ecules in the unit cell. Numerous inter­molecular C—H⋯π inter­actions dominate in the crystal structure, where C—H⋯Cl and long Cl⋯Cl contacts are also observed.     

Aqua(2,2′‐bi‐1H‐imidazole)chloro­copper(II) chloro­(imino­diacetato)copper(II) monohydrate

In the title compound, [CuCl(C₆H₆N₄)(H₂O)][Cu(C₄H₅NO₄)Cl]·H₂O, the Cu^II atom in the cation is coordinated by one Cl⁻ ion, two N atoms of the 2,2′‐biimidazole ligand and one aqua ligand. Within the anion, the Cu^II atom is bonded to one Cl⁻ ion, and one N and two O atoms of the imino­diacetate ligand. Neighbouring cations and anions are connected to each other by Cu·Cl semi‐coordination bonds of 2.830 (12) and 3.071 (12) Å, forming a Cu₂Cl₂ rectangular unit. The dinuclear units further link into a polymeric chain along the a axis through Cu·O_aqua interactions of 2.725 (3) Å. Including the long coordination bonds, the geometries around the Cu atoms in the cation and anion are square‐pyramidal and distorted octahedral, respectively.     

9‐(1‐Acetoxy­ethyl­idene)­fluorene (`diacetyl­fluorene'), a by‐product from the acetyl­ation of 9‐fluorenyl­lithium

Treatment of 9‐fluorenyl­lithium with acetyl chloride produces 9‐acetyl­fluorene, (I), and several by‐products, among which is `di­acetyl­fluorene', now characterized definitively as 9‐(1‐acetoxy­ethyl­idene)­fluorene [IUPAC name: (1‐fluoren‐9‐yl­idene­)ethyl acetate], (II), C₁₇H₁₄O₂, derived from acetyl­ation of initially formed (I). Various parameters disclose substantial structural distortion within (II) emanating from A^(1,3) strain associated with the 9‐(acetoxy­ethyl­idenyl)­fluorene system.     

Amarisolide monohydrate,a 2‐(β‐glu­cosyl)­neoclerodane

The absolute configuration of the neoclerodane glycoside amarisolide, presented here as the monohydrate, C₂₆H₃₆O₉·H₂O, has been determined by association with the known configuration of the glucose moiety. Its structure was established as 2β‐(O‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­neocleroda‐3,13(16),14‐trien‐15,16‐epoxy‐18,19‐olide. Extensive hydrogen bonding among the hydroxyl groups of the sugar moiety forms layers which are interconnected by water mol­ecules.     

Secondary interactions in the iso­morphous compounds 2,6‐bis­(chloro­methyl)­pyridinium chloride and 2,6‐bis­(bromo­methyl)­pyridinium bromide

The title compounds, C₇H₈Cl₂N⁺·Cl⁻ and C₇H₈Br₂N⁺·Br⁻, are isomorphous. In the crystal packing, layers parallel to the ac plane are formed by a classical N⁺—H⋯X⁻ hydrogen bond (X = halogen) and two X⋯X contacts. A third X⋯X contact links the layers, and a fourth, which is however very long, completes a ladder‐like motif of halogen atoms. Hydro­gen bonds of the form C—H⋯X play at best a subordinate role in the packing.     

(1E)‐2‐(Di­acetyl­amino)‐1‐methyl­prop‐­1‐enyl acetate

The analysis of the title compound, C₁₀H₁₅NO₄, firmly establishes the configuration of the double bond as E, a stereochemistry that had been assigned tentatively by other methods. The di­acetyl­amine and acetate substituents are approximately coplanar to one another, but approximately perpendicular to the planar ethene core. H atoms of the ethene methyl substituents are found within the ethene plane, indicating that hyperconjugation does not play an important role in stabilizing the double bond.     

4‐Fluoro‐2‐(phospho­no­methyl)­benzene­sulfonic acid monohydrate

The title compound, C₇H₈FO₆PS·H₂O, contains both phospho­nic and sulfonic acid functionalities. An extensive network of O—H?O hydrogen bonds is present in the crystal structure. The three acidic protons are associated with the phospho­nate group. Two protons experience typical hydrogen‐bond contacts with the sulfonate‐O atoms, while the third has a longer covalent bond of 1.05 (3) Å to the phospho­nate‐O atom and a short hydrogen‐bond contact of 1.38 (3) Å to the water O atom (all O—H?O angles are in the range 162–175°). The sulfonate group is positioned so that one S—O bond is nearly coplanar with the phenyl ring [torsion angle O—S—C—C ?8.6 (2)°]. The phospho­nate group is oriented approximately perpendicular to the ring [torsion angle P—C—C—C 99.2 (2)°] with one P—O bond anti to the benzyl C—C bond. The mol­ecules pack in layers in the b–c plane with the water mol­ecules in between adjacent pairs of inverted layers.