The host–guest complex between cone‐25,26:27,28‐bis­(methyl­ene­dioxy)­calix­[4]­arene and di­chloro­methane

The title compound, 25,26:27,28‐bis­(methyl­ene­dioxy)­penta­cyclo­[19.3.1.1^3,7.1^9,13.1^15,19]­octacosa‐1(25)3,5,7(28),9,11,13(27),15,17,19(26),21,23‐dodecaene di­chloro­methane solvate, C₃₀H₂₄O₄·CH₂Cl₂, possesses crystallographic twofold sym­metry in both components. The calixarene shows a pinched cone conformation with an elliptical cavity, in which the guest di­chloro­methane solvent mol­ecule is accommodated. The contact distance between guest and host (H⋯ring centroid = 2.44 Å) is extremely short.     

Benzo­[i]­naphtho­[c,d]­bi­cyclo­[5.4.1]dodecan‐12‐one

In the title compound, penta­cyclo­[11.8.1.1^3,11.0^7,23.0^15,20]­tricosa‐3,5,7,9,11(23),15,17,19‐octaen‐22‐one, C₂₃H₂₀O, the bi­cyclo­[5.4.1]­dodecan‐12‐one moiety takes a rigid conformation in which the seven‐ and eight‐membered rings take chair and boat–boat forms, respectively. The mol­ecule has a non‐crystallographic mirror symmetry perpendicular to the benzene and naphthalene planes.     

A ferrocenyl‐substituted pseudo­titanocene complex

The title compound, (η⁵‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)[(1,2,3,4,5‐η)‐4‐ferro­cenyl‐1,2,5,6‐tetrakis­(tri­methyl­silyl)­cyclo­hexa‐2,4‐dien‐1‐yl]­titanium(II), [TiFe(C₅H₅)₂(C₂₃H₄₂Si₄)] or [Ti{η⁵‐C₆H₂{Fe­(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁵‐C₅H₅)}{Si(CH₃)₃}₄}(η⁵‐C₅H₅)], possesses two directly linked metallocene units that subtend an angle of 52.9 (1)° (defined by the least‐squares planes of the directly connected π‐ligands) associated with the steric requirements of the bulky tri­methyl­silyl substituents. The cyclo­hexa­dienyl ligand adopts an envelope conformation; the perpendicular distance of its η⁵‐plane to the Ti atom is 1.512 (1) Å.     

A novel binucleating macrocyclic ligand with two alcohol pendants

A novel binucleating 24‐membered macrocyclic ligand, 6,20‐bis(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)‐3,6,9,17,20,23‐hex­aza­tri­cyclo­[23.3.1.1^11,15]triaconta‐1(29),11(30),12,14,25,27‐hexaene (L), was synthesized and crystallized as the tetra­hydro­bromide salt, i.e. 6,20‐bis(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)‐6,20‐di­aza‐3,9,17,23‐hexa­azoniatri­cyclo­[23.3.1.1^11,15]­triaconta‐1(29),11(30),­12,14,25,27‐hexaene tetrabromide tetrahydrate, C₂₈H₅₀N₆O₂⁴⁺·­4Br^?·4H₂O. A crystallographic inversion center is located in the macrocyclic cavity and the two hydroxy­ethyl pendants are on opposite sides of the macrocyclic plane. The benzene rings of the macrocycle are parallel to each other and a π–π‐stacking interaction exists between the benzene rings of adjacent macrocycles, which are separated by 3.791 (9) Å. An infinite intermolecular hydrogen‐bond network stabilizes the crystal.     

Inclusion of diprotonated [2.2.2]cryptand in the cavity of uranyl‐complexed p‐phenyl­tetra­homodioxacalix[4]arene

In the title compound, 4,7,13,16,21,24‐hexa­oxa‐1,10‐diazo­nia­bicyclo­[8.8.8]hexa­cosane dioxo[7,13,21,27‐tetra­phenyl‐3,17‐di­oxa­penta­cyclo­[23.3.1.1^5,9.1^11,15.1^19,23]ditriaconta‐1(29),5,7,9(30),11(31),12,14,19(32),20,22,25,27‐dodeca­ene‐29,30,31,32‐tetra­olato]uranium dimethyl sulfoxide tri­solvate, (C₁₈H₃₈N₂O₆)[U(C₅₄H₄₀O₆)O₂]·3C₂H₆OS, the uranyl ion is bound to the four phenoxide groups of the deprotonated p‐phenyl­tetra­homodioxacalix[4]arene ligand in a cone conformation, resulting in a dianionic complex. The diprotonated [2.2.2]cryptand counter‐ion is located in the cavity defined by the eight aromatic rings of the homooxacalixarene, where it is held by cation–anion, cation–π and possibly C—H⋯π inter­actions. Dimerization in the packing leads to the formation of sandwich assemblages in which two diprotonated [2.2.2]cryptands are encompassed by two uranyl complexes.     

A highly functionalized ferrocenyl­pyrazolo­[2,3‐a]­pyridine

The crystal structure of [2‐(4‐bromo­phenyl)‐4‐cyano‐5‐ferrocenyl­pyrazolo­[2,3‐a]­pyridin‐7‐yl]­aceto­nitrile, C₂₆H₁₇N₄FeBr or [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₁H₁₂BrN₄)], shows that the pyrazolo­pyridine ring system (PP), the bromo­phenyl ring (BP) and the cyclo­penta­diene ring (Cp) are nearly planar. The PP ring system is twisted out of the plane of the BP and Cp rings by about 20°.     

A donor–acceptor compound composed of a di­nuclear zinc(II) complex of a Robson macro­cycle with 8‐methyl­quino­line

A donor–acceptor compound, di­aqua‐1κO,2κO‐[μ‐11,23‐dimethyl‐3,7,15,19‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo­[19.3.1.1^9,13]hexacosa‐1(25),2,7,9,11,13(26),14,19,21,23‐decaene‐25,­26‐diolato‐1κ⁴N³,N⁷,O²⁵,O²⁶:­2κ⁴N¹⁵,N¹⁹,O²⁵,O²⁶]­dizinc(II) diperchlorate bis(8‐methyl­quinoline) ethanol disolvate, [Zn₂(C₂₄H₂₆N₄O₂)(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂·2C₁₀H₉N·2C₂H₆O, obtained by the reaction of a dinuclear zinc(II) complex of a Robson macrocycle (acceptor) and 8‐methyl­quinoline (donor), lies about an inversion centre and the coordination about the unique Zn atom is a distorted square pyramid. The fifth coordination site is occupied by the water mol­ecule, Zn—O = 2.016 (2) Å, and the average macrocyclic Zn—O and Zn—N distances are 2.059 (6) and 2.059 (3) Å, respectively.     

Azido­[1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene](penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate

In the title compound, azido‐2κN‐bis­[μ‐(1η⁵:2κP)‐di­phenyl­phosphino­cyclo­penta­dienyl][2(η⁵)‐penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­di­enyl]­iron(III)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [{Rh(C₁₀H₁₅)(N₃)}{Fe(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂}]PF₆ or [FeRh(C₁₀H₁₅)(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂(N₃)]PF₆, the coordination sphere of Rh^III can be described as pseudo‐tetrahedral, composed of two P atoms from a 1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene (dppf) ligand, an azido N atom and the centroid of the ring of a C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ligand. The two cyclo­penta­dienyl rings in the dppf moiety adopt an eclipsed conformation. The Rh⋯Fe distance is 4.340 (2) Å.     

Methoxy‐ether and crown‐ether ­derivatives of tetrahomodioxa‐ and octahomotetraoxacalix­[4]­arenes

Three methoxy­‐ether and one methoxy‐­ether/crown‐ether derivatives of p‐tert‐butyl­tetrahomodioxa‐ and p‐R‐octahomo­tetraoxacalix­[4]­arenes (R = methyl, tert‐butyl, H) have been investigated. The first three compounds, 7,15,21,27‐tetra‐tert‐butyl‐29,30,31,32‐tetra­methoxy‐3,11‐dioxapenta­cyclo­[23.3.­1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^19,23]­ditriaconta‐1(29),5,7,­9(30),­13,15,‐17(31),­19,21,23(32),25,27‐dodecaene, C₅₀H₆₈O₆, 33,34,35,36‐tetra­methoxy‐7,15,23,31‐tetra­methyl‐3,11,19,27‐tetra­oxa­penta­cyclo[27.3.1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^21,25]­hexa­tri­aconta‐1(33),5,7,9(34),13,15,­17(35),21,23,25(36),29,31‐dodecaene, C₄₀H₄₈O₈, and 7,23‐di‐tert‐butyl‐33,34,35,36‐tetra­methoxy‐3,11,19,27‐tetraoxapenta­cyclo­[27.3.1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^21,25]­hexatriaconta‐1(33),5,7,9(34),13,15,­17(35),‐ 21,23,25(36),29,31‐dodecaene, C₄₄H₅₆O₈, in the partial‐cone or 1,2‐alternate conformations, present the common feature of methoxy‐­ether self‐inclusion, while the fourth, 42,43‐di­methoxy‐7,15,23,31‐tetra­methyl‐3,11,19,27,34,37,40‐heptaoxahexa­cyclo[15.15.9.1^5,9.1^21,25.0^13,41.0^29,33]­tritetra­conta‐5(42),6,8,13(41),­14,16,21(43),22,24,29(33),30,32‐dodecaene, C₄₂H₅₀O₉, adopts the 1,3‐alternate conformation owing to the presence of a 1,3‐polyether chain.     

Supramolecular aggregation of two hydroxy­carboxylic acid derivatives

The crystal structures of 7,7‐dicyclo­but­yl‐5‐hydroxy­meth­yl‐6‐oxabicyclo­[3.2.1]octa­ne‐1‐carboxylic acid, C₁₇H₂₆O₄, (I), and 1‐(hydroxy­meth­yl)‐7‐oxaspiro­[bicyclo­[3.2.1]octa­ne‐6,1′‐cyclo­penta­ne]‐5‐carboxylic acid, C₁₃H₂₀O₄, (II), determined at 170 K, show that the conformation of the hydroxy­meth­yl group (anti or gauche) affects the dimensionality (one‐ or two‐dimensional) of the supramolecular structures via O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In (I), the carbox­yl and hydroxy­meth­yl groups inter­act with themselves, forming a one‐dimensional step‐ladder, while in (II), a two‐dimensional structure is made up of carboxylic acid centrosymmetric R₂²(8) dimers connected by hydrox­yl‐to‐ether contacts.     

Two bis­(ammonium) 1,5‐naphthalene­disulfonate salts

The title compounds, bis­(ammonium) naphthalene‐1,5‐di­sul­fon­ate, 2NH₄⁺·C₁₀H₆O₆S₂²⁻, and bis­[1‐(hydroxy­methyl)‐3,5,7‐tri­aza‐1‐azoniatri­cyclo­[3.3.1.1^3,7]­decane] 1,5‐naphthalene­di­sul­fon­ate, 2C₇H₁₅N₄O⁺·C₁₀H₆O₆S₂²⁻, were prepared from the acid‐promoted reaction of hexa­methyl­enetetr­amine. In both structures, the di­sulfonate anion is positioned on an inversion center, with each sulfonate group contributing to the supramolecular assemblies via hydrogen bonds. The ammonium cations are linked to sulfonate groups by four distinct N⁺—H⃛⁻O—S contacts [N⃛O = 2.846 (2)–2.898 (2) Å and N—H⃛O = 160 (2)–175 (2)°], whereas the 1‐(hydroxy­methyl)‐3,5,7‐tri­aza‐1‐azoniatri­cyclo­[3.3.1.1^3,7]­decane cations form one O—H⃛⁻O—S [O⃛O = 2.628 (2) Å and O—H⃛O = 176°] and three C—H⃛⁻O—S [C⃛O = 3.359 (2)–3.380 (2) Å and C—H⃛O = 148–155°] interactions to neighboring sulfonate groups.     

An intermediate in a new synthesis approach to β‐substituted β‐hydroxy­aspartame

The crystal and molecular structure of 1‐tert‐butyl 4‐ethyl (2′R,3′R,5′R,2S,3S)‐3‐bromo­methyl‐3‐hydroxy‐2‐[(2′‐hydroxy‐2′,6′,6′‐tri­methyl­bi­cyclo­[3.1.1]­hept‐3′‐yl­idene)­amino]­succinate, C₂₁H₃₄BrNO₆, is presented. This compound is an intermediate in the new synthetic route to β‐substituted β‐hydroxy­aspartates, which are blockers of glutamate transport.     

An anthracene dimer with a fused 1,3‐dithiole ring at 193 K

The first butterfly‐shaped anthracene dimer including S atoms,8,9‐di­hydro‐3a,8[1′,2′]:9,13b[1′′,2′′]­di­benzeno­dibenzo­[3,4:7,8]cyclo­octa­[1,2‐d]‐1,3‐di­thiole, C₂₉H₂₀S₂, contains an exceptionally long Csp³—Csp³ bond of 1.672 (2) Å in the fused 1,3‐di­thiole ring. The length of the other bond bridging the anthracene moieties is 1.604 (3) Å.     

2‐{[Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]aminomethylene}cyclohexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one and its 6‐hydroxy and 6‐methoxy derivatives

The title compounds, 2‐{[tris­(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]­amino­methyl­ene}cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₁H₁₅NO₄, (I), 6‐hydroxy‐2‐{[tris­(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]­amino­methyl­ene}­cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₁H₁₅NO₅, (II), and 6‐methoxy‐2‐{[tris­(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]­amino­methyl­ene}­cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₂H₁₇NO₅, (III), adopt the keto–amine tautomeric form, with the formal hydroxy H atom located on the N atom, and the NH group and oxo O atom display a strong intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond. The N—H⋯O hydrogen‐bonded rings are almost planar and coupled with the cyclo­hexa­diene rings. The carbonyl O atoms accept two other H atoms from the alcohol groups of adjacent mol­ecules in (I), and one from the alcohol and one from the phenol group in (II), but from only one alcohol H atom in (III).     

A dinuclear uranium(IV) complex of the chelating ligand 1,2,3,4‐tetra­methyl‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)­cyclo­penta­diene

The ligand 1,2,3,4‐tetra­methyl‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)­cyclo­penta­diene (cp*py) forms a dinuclear complex with U^IV, i.e. di‐μ‐oxo‐bis­{chloro­(diethyl ether‐κO)[(η⁵,κN)‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­methyl‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)­cyclo­penta­dienyl]uranium(IV)}, [U₂Cl₂O₂(C₁₄H₁₆N)₂(C₄H₁₀O)₂], in which cp*py acts as a chelating ligand, being bound to the metal atom by the cyclo­penta­dienyl unit and also by the N atom of the pyridyl ring.     

Trifluoro­meth­yl derivatives of penta­cyclo­[5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undeca­ne

Three cage‐like polycyclic compounds, viz.exo‐8‐(trifluoro­meth­yl)­penta­cyclo­[5.4.0.0^2,6.0^3,10.0^5,9]undecan‐endo‐8‐ol, C₁₂H₁₃F₃O, 5‐(trifluoro­meth­yl)‐4‐oxahexa­cyclo­[5.4.1.0^2,6.0^3,10.0^5,9.0^8,11]­dodecan‐3‐ol, C₁₂H₁₁F₃O₂, and N‐[exo‐11‐(trifluoro­meth­yl)‐endo‐11‐(trimethyl­sil­yl­oxy)­penta­cyclo­[5.4.0.0^2,6.0^3,10.0^5,9]undecan‐8‐yl­idene]aniline meth­anol solvate, C₂₁H₂₄F₃NOSi·CH₄O, were obtained from the corresponding oxo derivatives by nucleophilic trifluoro­methyl­ation with (tri­fluorometh­yl)trimethyl­silane in 1,2‐dimethoxy­ethane solution in the presence of CsF. The crystal structures show that the addition of trifluoro­methanide occurs exclusively from the exo face of the polycyclic ketones. Further examination of the crystal structures, together with that of the starting penta­cyclo­[5.4.0.0^2,6.0^3,10.0^5,9]undecane‐8,11‐dione, C₁₁H₁₀O₂, showed that increasing substitution at the 8‐ and/or 11‐positions in the cage mol­ecules increases the non‐bonded intra­molecular C·C distances at the mouth of the cage and changes the puckering of the five‐membered rings involving the 8‐ and 11‐positions from an envelope towards a distorted half‐chair conformation. Inter­molecular co‐operative O—H·O hydrogen bonds in the endo‐8‐ol compound link the mol­ecules into tetra­mers.     

A fluoro­phenylboron‐functionalized zirconium silsesquioxane complex

Bis(η⁵‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)[rel‐(1R,5S,7R,14S)‐(1,3,5,7,9,11,14‐hepta­cyclo­pentyl‐7,14‐dioxidotri­cyclo­[7.3.3^1,9.1^5,11]­hepta­siloxan‐3‐yloxy)­bis­(penta­fluoro­phenyl)­borane(2−)]­zirconium, [Zr(C₅H₅)₂(C₄₇H₆₃BF₁₀O₁₂Si₇)], consists of [ZrCp₂] (Cp is cyclopentadienyl) and [(C₆F₅)₂B] moieties bound to a silsesquioxane core. The silsesquioxane binds to the Zr atom through two of its O atoms to form a distorted tetrahedron. The [(C₆F₅)₂B] moiety is bound to the silsesquioxane through an O atom, forming an Si—O—B bond angle of 168.4 (4)°. The steric and electronic effects of the Zr atom and the borate moieties force the silsesquioxane core to distort. These distortions can be seen by examination of the Si—O—Si bond angles.     

[{Me4C2(C5H4)2}Zr(BH4)2], a bis(tetra­hydro­borate) complex of a bridged zirconocene

Bis(tetra­hydro­borato)­[1,1,2,2‐tetra­methyl‐1,2‐ethyl­enebis­(η⁵‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)]­zirconium, (I), was synthesized by the reaction of the zirconocene dichloride with lithium tetra­hydro­borate. Crystals suitable for X‐ray structure analysis were obtained by recrystallization from toluene. The mol­ecule adopts an appproximate C_2v symmetry. Both tetra­hydro­borate ligands are η²‐coordinated and tilted by 18–19° out of the equatorial plane; the angle B1—Zr1—B2 is 104.7°. The cyclo­penta­dienyl rings show a normal η⁵‐coordinaton, with a centroid–Zr–centroid angle of 124.3°.     

The dimeric mixed‐ligand titana­carborane sandwich [1‐(Cp)‐1‐Ti‐2‐(Me)‐3‐(SiMe3)‐2,3‐C2B4H4]2

The title dimer, bis­[1‐cyclo­penta­dienyl‐2‐methyl‐1‐titana‐3‐tri­methylsilyl‐2,3‐dicarba‐closo‐hexaborane(6)], [Ti(C₅H₅)(C₆­H₁₆­B₄Si)]₂, reveals that the centrosymmetric mol­ecule consists of two bent‐sandwich titanacarboranes bridged by the B—H—Ti bonds. The average bond distances are Ti—B 2.445 (3), Ti—C(cage) 2.334 (2) and Ti—C(Cp) 2.376 (3) Å, and the corresponding bond angles are Cp—Ti—Cp 163.2 (1) and Cp—Ti—Cb (Cb = C₂B₃ face) 139.9 (1)°; the Ti—H separations are 2.10 (2) and 2.19 (2) Å.     

Tri­benzyl{η5‐[2‐(p‐tolyl)­prop‐2‐yl]­cyclo­penta­dienyl}­zirconium

The title compound, [Zr(C₇H₇)₃(C₁₅H₁₇)], (I), crystallizes from light petroleum with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. Whereas in the parent mol­ecule, Zr(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CH₂Ph)₃, all three Zr—CH₂Ph angles are equal, in (I), they differ significantly. In spite of their different environments, both independent mol­ecules in (I) exhibit a small, an expected, and a large Zr—CH₂Ph angle. The angles are similar to those of the closely related tri­benzyl­[η⁵‐(benzyl­di­methyl­silyl)­cyclo­penta­dienyl]­zirconium complex. The smallest Zr—CH₂Ph angle and the consequently relatively short Zr?C_ipso distance are indicative of η²‐bonding of the benzyl group.