2‐Amino­thia­zole and 2‐amino­thiazolinone derivatives

The reaction of different substituted α‐cyano­oxiranes with thio­urea resulted in the formation of the 2‐amino­thia­zolinone derivative 2‐amino‐5‐(2,5‐di­methoxy­phenyl)‐1,3‐thia­zol‐4(5H)‐one, C₁₁H₁₂N₂O₃S, (I), and the 2‐amino­thia­zole derivative ethyl 2‐amino‐5‐(2,5‐di­methoxy­phenyl)‐1,3‐thia­zole‐4‐carboxyl­ate, C₁₄H₁₆N₂O₄S, (II). The geometries of the two crystallographically independent mol­ecules in (II) are nearly identical but mirror related. The crystal structures of both compounds contain two types of intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

Three methoxy‐substituted diethyl 4‐­phenyl‐2,6‐di­methyl‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate compounds

Diethyl 4‐(2,5‐di­methoxy­phenyl)‐2,6‐di­methyl‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate, C₂₁H₂₇NO₆, (I), diethyl 4‐(3,4‐di­methoxy­phenyl)‐2,6‐di­methyl‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate, C₂₁H₂₇NO₆, (II), and diethyl 2,6‐di­methyl‐4‐(3,4,5‐tri­methoxy­phenyl)‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate, C₂₂H₂₉NO₇, (III), crystallize with hydrogen‐bonding networks involving the H atom bonded to the N atom of the 1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine ring and carbonyl O atoms in (I) and (II). Unusually, (III) shows O atoms of methoxy groups serving as hydrogen‐bond acceptors.     

Dichloro(2,2′‐diamino‐4,4′‐bi‐1,3‐thiazole‐N3,N3′)copper(II)

The title complex, [CuCl₂(C₆H₆N₄S₂)], has a flattened tetrahedral coordination. The Cu^II atom is located on a twofold rotation axis and is coordinated by two N atoms from a chelating 2,2′‐di­amino‐4,4′‐bi‐1,3‐thia­zole ligand and by two Cl atoms. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding exists between the amino groups of the 2,2′‐di­amino‐4,4′‐bi‐1,3‐thia­zole ligand and the Cl atoms. The intermolecular separation of 3.425 (1) Å between parallel bi­thia­zole rings suggests there is a π–π interaction between them.     

Derivatives of 4‐(2‐hydro­xy­lphenyl)‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1,5‐benzothiazepine

In the structures of 2‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1,5‐benzo­thia­zepine, C₂₁H₁₆ClNOS, 4‐(2‐hy­droxy­phenyl)‐2‐(4‐tolyl)‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1,5‐ben­zo­thia­zepine, C₂₂H₁₉NOS, and 4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐(3‐methoxy­phenyl)‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1,5‐benzo­thia­zepine, C₂₂H₁₉NO₂S, the central seven‐membered heterocyclic rings adopt twist‐boat conformations in which the N atoms are involved in strong intramolecular hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl H atoms, resulting in six‐membered rings.     

4‐Methyl‐2‐[N‐(3,4‐methyl­ene­dioxy­benzyl­idene)hydrazino]­thia­zole and its reduction product, 4‐methyl‐2‐[N‐(3,4‐methyl­ene­dioxybenzyl­idene)hydrazono]‐4,5‐di­hydro­thia­zole

The crystal structures of 4‐methyl‐2‐[N‐(3,4‐methyl­ene­dioxybenzyl­idene)hydrazino]­thia­zole, C₁₂H₁₁N₃O₂S, and its reduction product 4‐methyl‐2‐[N‐(3,4‐methyl­ene­dioxybenzyl­idene)hydrazono]‐4,5‐di­hydro­thia­zole, C₁₂H₁₃N₃O₂S, have been determined and compared. In the reduction product, the tautomer observed bears an H atom on the exocyclic N atom. Both compounds form hydrogen‐bonded dimers over centers of inversion.     

A neutral complex of an azino–DTDAF compound with TCNQ

In the crystal structure of the title 1:1 complex, ethyl 2‐{[5‐(ethoxy­carbonyl)‐2,3‐dihydro‐3,4‐di­methyl‐1,3‐thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene]­hydrazono}‐2,3‐di­hydro‐3,4‐di­methyl‐1,3‐thia­zole‐5‐carboxyl­ate–7,7,8,8‐tetra­cyano‐p‐quinodi­methane (1/1), C₁₆H₂₂N₄O₄S₂·C₁₂H₄N₄, the planar donor and tetra­cyano‐p‐quinodi­methane (TCNQ) mol­ecules are each located on inversion centres and are stacked alternately. The bond lengths indicate that, in this complex, the donor and acceptor are neutral, as confirmed by IR investigation.     

1,3‐Thia­zolidine derivatives from regioselective [2+3]‐cyclo­additions of azomethine yl­ides with thio­ketones

The title compounds, namely di­methyl (2RS)‐2,3‐di­phenyl‐1,3‐thia­zolidine‐5‐spiro‐2′‐adam­antane‐4,4‐di­carboxyl­ate methanol sol­vate, C₂₈H₃₁NO₄S·0.275CH₄O, and di­methyl (4RS)‐3,4‐di­phenyl‐1,3‐thia­zolidine‐5‐spiro‐9′‐(9′H‐fluorene)‐2,2‐di­car­box­ylate, C₃₁H₂₅NO₄S, were obtained from dipolar [2+3]‐cyclo­additions of an azo­methine yl­ide with adamantane­thione and thio­fluorenone, respectively. The structures show that the choice of thio­ketone affects the regioselectivity of the cyclo­addition. The asymmetric unit of the former structure contains two mol­ecules of the thia­zolidine derivative plus a site for a partial occupancy (55%) methanol mol­ecule. O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O interactions link two of each of these entities into closed centrosymmetric hexamers. The five‐membered ring in each structure has an envelope conformation.     

Two orthopalladated chromophores

The title compounds, {5‐(di­methyl­amino)‐2‐[N‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­imino­methyl]­phenyl}[N‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐4‐nitro­salicyl­aldiminato]­palladium(II), [Pd(C₁₄H₁₁N₂O₄)(C₁₆H₁₇N₂O)], (I), and [4‐(diethyl­amino)‐N‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­sali­cyl­aldiminato]{2‐[N‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­imino­methyl]‐5‐nitrophenyl}palladium(II) di­chloro­methane hemisolvate, [Pd(C₁₄H₁₁N₂O₃)(C₁₈H₂₁N₂O₂)]·0.5CH₂Cl₂, (II), both contain push–pull chromophores coordinated to Pd in a square‐planar arrangement. In both compounds, the five‐membered orthopalladated ring is essentially planar, while the coordinated six‐membered ring is not. Deviations from a coplanar arrangement of the phenyl­ene rings of the coordinated Schiff bases are observed in both (I) and (II) as a result of intramolecular steric interactions.     

N‐(3H‐Thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene)­nitr­amine and N‐methyl‐N‐(thia­zol‐2‐yl)­nitr­amine

The geometries of the thia­zole ring and the nitr­amino groups in N‐(3H‐thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene)­nitr­amine, C₃H₃N₃O₂S, (I), and N‐­methyl‐N‐(thia­zol‐2‐yl)­nitr­amine, C₄H₅N₃O₂S, (II), are very similar. The nitr­amine group in (II) is planar and twisted along the C—N bond with respect to the thia­zole ring. In both structures, the asymmetric unit includes two practically equal mol­ecules. In (I), the mol­ecules are arranged in layers connected to each other by N—H⋯N and much weaker C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In the crystal structure of (II), the mol­ecules are arranged in layers bound to each other by both weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and S⋯O dipolar interactions.     

6‐(3,4‐Di­fluoro­benzoyl)‐3‐[2‐(4‐pyridyl)­ethyl]‐1,3‐benzo­thia­zol‐2(3H)‐one

A new type of benzo­thia­zolinone derivative with potential pharmacological activity, viz. 6‐(3,4‐di­fluoro­benzoyl)‐3‐[2‐(4‐pyridyl)­ethyl]‐1,3‐benzo­thia­zol‐2(3H)‐one, C₂₁H₁₄F₂N₂O₂S, has been prepared and studied by NMR, IR and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The mol­ecule is not planar, the pyridine and di­fluoro­benzene moieties being located above and below the benzo­thia­zole ring system. The carbonyl O atoms are involved in an intramolecular hydrogen‐bond‐type interaction.     

Packing considerations of bis‐dimedone derivatives

We have determined the crystal structures of 2,2′‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₇FO₄, (I), 2,2′‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hy­droxy‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₇ClO₄, (II), 2,2′‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₈O₅, (III), 2,2′‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₄H₃₀O₄, (IV), 2,2′‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hy­droxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₄H₃₀O₅, (V), and 2,2′‐(4‐N,N′‐di­methyl­amino­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₅H₃₃NO₄, (VI). Structures (III) to (VI) of these bis‐dimedone derivatives show nearly the same packing pattern irrespective of the different substituent in the para position of the aromatic ring. However, (II) does not fit into this scheme, although the Cl atom is a substituent not too different from the others. The different packing of the fluoro compound, (I), can be explained by the fact that it crystallizes with two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, which show a different conformation of the dimedone ring. On the other hand, (I) shows a similar packing pattern to bis(2‐hydroxy‐4,4‐di­methyl‐6‐oxo‐1‐cyclo­hexenyl)­phenyl­methane, a compound containing an aromatic ring without any substituent and with Z′ = 2.     

An analysis of C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions in three substituted 4‐ketotetra­hydro­indoles

The crystal and molecular structures of the three 4‐ketotetrahydro­indoles 2‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐1‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)‐6,6‐dimethyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro‐1H‐indol‐4‐one (C₂₂H₁₉ClFNO), (I), 1‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)‐2‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐6,6‐di­methyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro‐1H‐indol‐4‐one (C₂₃H₂₂FNO₂), (II), and 6,6‐dimethyl‐1,2‐di­phenyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro‐1H‐indol‐4‐one (C₂₂H₂₁NO), (III), have been determined via single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction in order to study the intermolecular interactions therein. All three structures are stabilized via intermolecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions, generating different molecular motifs.     

Three (E)‐2‐[(bromo­phen­yl)imino­meth­yl]‐4‐methoxy­phenols

The title compounds, (E)‐2‐[(2‐bromo­phenyl)imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (I), (E)‐2‐[(3‐bromo­phenyl)­imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (II), and (E)‐2‐[(4‐bromo­phenyl)imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (III), adopt the phenol–imine tautomeric form. In all three structures, there are strong intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Compound (I) has strong inter­molecular hydrogen bonds, while compound (III) has weak inter­molecular hydrogen bonds. In addition to these inter­molecular inter­actions, C—H⋯π inter­actions in (I) and (III), and π–π inter­actions in (I), play roles in the crystal packing. The dihedral angles between the aromatic rings are 15.34 (12), 6.1 (3) and 39.2 (14)° for (I), (II) and (III), respectively.     

Isochroman derivatives and their tendency to crystallize in chiral space groups

In methyl [5‐methoxy‐4‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­isochroman‐3‐yl]­acetate, C₂₀H₂₂O₅, (I), and methyl [4‐(2,5‐di­methoxy­phenyl)‐8‐methoxy­isochroman‐3‐yl]­acetate, C₂₁H₂₄O₆, (II), the heterocyclic rings adopt half‐chair conformations. The substituents at the 3‐ and 4‐positions are in a trans configuration in both (I) and (II), being in an axial conformation in (I) and in an equatorial conformation in (II). The crystal structure of (I) is stabilized by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonding, leading to the formation of an infinite three‐dimensional network. Compound (II) crystallizes in a chiral space group. This feature, which was also found in previously investigated isochroman derivatives, is related to the arrangement of substituents attached to the isochroman moiety.     

Two 5‐oxa‐2,6‐diazaspiro[3.4]octan‐1‐one derivatives from the [3+2] cyclo­addition of methylenelactams with nitrones

The two title 5‐oxa‐2,6‐di­aza­spiro­[3.4]­octan‐1‐one adducts, 7‐benzoyl‐2‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐6‐phenyl‐5‐oxa‐2,6‐di­aza­spiro­[3.4]­octan‐1‐one, C₂₅H₂₂N₂O₄, (III), and 6‐tert‐butyl‐2‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐7‐phenyl‐5‐oxa‐2,6‐di­aza­spiro­[3.4]­octan‐1‐one, C₂₂H₂₆N₂O₂, (IV), were obtained from a stereospecific [3+2] 1,3‐cyclo­addition of 3‐methyl­ene azetidin‐2‐ones as dipolaro­philes with nitro­nes. The lactam ring is conjugated with the p‐­methoxy­phenyl or p‐methyl­phenyl moiety. The envelope conformations of the isoxazolidine rings in (III) and (IV) are different, leading the substituents to be pseudo‐axial in (III) and pseudo‐equatorial in (IV).     

The diastereoisomers methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(R)/(S)‐methoxycarbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydropyrrol‐1‐ylcarbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydropyrazole‐3‐carboxylate

The title diastereoisomers, methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(S)‐methoxy­carbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetra­hydro­pyrrol‐1‐yl­carbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro­pyrazole‐3‐carboxyl­ate and methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(R)‐methoxycarbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydropyrrol‐1‐ylcarbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro­pyrazole‐3‐carboxylate, both C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅, have been studied in two crystalline forms. The first form, methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(S)‐methoxy­carbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydropyrrol‐1‐ylcarbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro­pyrazole‐3‐carboxyl­ate–methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(R)‐methoxy­carbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetra­hydro­pyrrol‐1‐yl­carbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydropyrazole‐3‐carboxylate (1/1), 2(S),5(S)‐C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅·2(R),5(S)‐C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅, contains both S,S and S,R isomers, while the second, methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(S)‐methoxycarbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro­pyrrol‐1‐ylcarbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro­pyrazole‐3‐carboxyl­ate, 2(S),5(S)‐C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅, is the pure S,S isomer. The S,S isomers in the two structures show very similar geometries, the maximum difference being about 15° on one torsion angle. The differences between the S,S and S,R isomers, apart from those due to the inversion of one chiral centre, are more remarkable, and are partially due to a possible rotational disorder of the 2‐­(methoxycarbonyl)tetrahydropyrrole group.     

4,5‐Propyl­enedi­thio‐1,3‐di­thiole‐2‐thione and 4,5‐propyl­enedi­thio‐1,3‐di­thiol‐2‐one

4,5‐Propyl­ene­di­thio‐1,3‐di­thiole‐2‐thione, C₆H₆S₅, (I), crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c. The molecular packing is characterized by pairs of S⋯S intermolecular contacts between neighbouring mol­ecules, which may account for the rather high thermal stablity of the crystal. 4,5‐Propyl­ene­di­thio‐1,3‐di­thiol‐2‐one, C₆H₆OS₄, (II), in which an O atom replaces the terminal S atom of (I), crystallizes in the non‐centrosymmetric polar space group Cc. The packing pattern of (II) indicates that the macropolarization direction is along [101]. Although the packing patterns are qualitatively significantly different, the molecular structures of (I) and (II) are similar, each exhibiting a chair conformation.     

Diphenyl(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐di­thiolato‐S,S′)plumbane at 295 K and diphenyl(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐di­thiolato‐S,S′)stannane at 150 K

Molecules of di­phenyl(2‐thio­xo‐1,3‐di­thiole‐4,5‐di­thiol­ato‐S,S′)­plumbane, [Pb(C₃S₅)(C₆H₅)₂], are linked into sheets via two intermolecular Pb?S_thione interactions of 3.322 (4) and 3.827 (4) Å; the Pb centre has a distorted octahedral geometry. In contrast, mol­ecules of ­di­phenyl(2‐thio­xo‐1,3‐di­thiole‐4,5‐di­thiol­ato‐S,S′)­stannane, [Sn(C₃S₅)(C₆H₅)₂], are linked into chains via a single intermolecular Sn—S_thione interaction of 2.8174 (9) Å; the Sn centre has a distorted trigonal‐bipy­ramidal geometry.     

2‐[2‐Methyl‐5‐nitro‐4‐(phenyl­sulfonyl­methyl)­imidazol‐1‐yl]­ethanol and 2‐methyl‐5‐nitro‐4‐phenyl­sulfonyl­methyl‐1,3‐thia­zole

The title compounds, C₁₃H₁₅N₃O₅S and C₁₁H₁₀N₂O₄S₂, respectively, both contain a phenyl­sulfonyl group connected, through a methyl­ene bridge, to either a substituted nitro­imidazole or nitro‐1,3‐thia­zole ring. In the imidazole‐containing mol­ecule, the nitro and sulfonyl groups are trans relative to the sulfonyl–methyl bond, while in the thia­zole‐containing mol­ecule, these substituents are cis. The stabilizing interactions within the crystals are also different between the two compounds.     

Charge‐transfer complexes of 4‐(di­methyl­amino)­pyridine with 2,4‐, 3,4‐ and 3,5‐di­nitro­benzoic acid

In the three title crystal structures 4‐(di­methyl­amino)­pyridinium 2,4‐di­nitro­benzoate, (I), 4‐(di­methyl­amino)­pyri­dinium 3,4‐di­nitro­benzo­ate, (II), and 4‐(di­methyl­amino)pyri­din­ium 3,5‐di­nitro­benzo­ate, (III), all C₇H₁₁N₂⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₆^?, the ions are connected by an N—H?O hydrogen bond. Dihedral angles between the pyridine and phenyl rings are 69.9 (1), 26.7 (1) and 56.2 (1)° in (I), (II) and (III), respectively. Donor–acceptor π–π stacking is observed in (II) and (III), but not in (I).