Supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded hexamers in two 5‐aryl‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyrazolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepines

In both title compounds, i.e. 3‐methyl‐1,5‐di­phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyrazolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepine, C₁₉H₁₈N₄, (I), and 5‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyra­zolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepine, C₁₉H₁₇ClN₄, (II), an N—H?N hydrogen bond links six mol­ecules to form an R(30) ring. Compound (I) crystallizes in the R space group and (II) crystallizes in P with three mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The mol­ecule of (I) contains a disordered seven‐membered ring.     

A highly functionalized ferrocenyl­pyrazolo­[2,3‐a]­pyridine

The crystal structure of [2‐(4‐bromo­phenyl)‐4‐cyano‐5‐ferrocenyl­pyrazolo­[2,3‐a]­pyridin‐7‐yl]­aceto­nitrile, C₂₆H₁₇N₄FeBr or [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₁H₁₂BrN₄)], shows that the pyrazolo­pyridine ring system (PP), the bromo­phenyl ring (BP) and the cyclo­penta­diene ring (Cp) are nearly planar. The PP ring system is twisted out of the plane of the BP and Cp rings by about 20°.     

(1S,2R,2′S)‐ and (1S,2S,2′S)‐1‐phenyl‐2‐phenyl­thio‐2‐(tetra­hydro­pyran‐2′‐yl­thio)­ethanol diastereoisomers at 193 K

In the synthesis of 1‐phenyl‐2‐phenyl­thio‐2‐(tetra­hydro­pyran‐2‐yl­thio)­ethanol, C₁₉H₂₂O₂S₂, four diastereoisomers are formed. Two non‐centrosymmetric enantiomeric forms which crystallize in space groups P2₁2₁2₁ and Pna2₁ are presented. The former has an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group and the O atom of the tetra­hydro­pyran ring. In the latter isomer, the hydroxyl group forms an intermolecular hydrogen bond to the O atom of the tetra­hydro­pyran­yl group of a neighbouring mol­ecule, joining the mol­ecules into chains in the c‐axis direction; the O?O distances are 2.962 (4) and 2.764 (3) Å, respectively. The tetra­hydro­pyran rings are in chair conformations in both isomers and the S side chain has an equatorial orientation in the former, but an axial orientation in the latter mol­ecule.     

10‐(4‐Fluorophenyl)‐3,3,6,6,9‐pentamethyl‐3,4,6,7,9,10‐hexahydroacridine‐1,8(2H,5H)‐dione and 10‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐3,3,6,6‐tetramethyl‐9‐­propyl‐3,4,6,7,9,10‐hexahydroacridine‐1,8(2H,5H)‐dione

10‐(4‐Fluoro­phenyl)‐3,3,6,6,9‐penta­methyl‐3,4,6,7,9,10‐hexa­hydro­acridine‐1,8(2H,5H)‐dione, C₂₄H₂₈FNO₂, (I), crystallizes with two crystallographically independent mol­ecules (which differ slightly in conformation), while 10‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)‐9‐propyl‐3,3,6,6‐tetra­methyl‐3,4,6,7,9,10‐hexa­hydro­acridine‐1,8(2H,5H)‐dione, C₂₆H₃₂FNO₂, (II), crystallizes with one mol­ecule per asymmetric unit. In both structures, the central ring in the acridine moiety is in a sofa conformation, while the outer rings adopt intermediate half‐chair/sofa conformations. The central pyridine ring is orthogonal to the substituted phenyl ring. In both structures, the packing of the crystal is stabilized by C—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

Di‐μ‐hydro­xo‐bis­(diiso­propyl­gallium)–1,4,8,11‐tetra­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane (1/1)

The hydro­lysis product [Ga₂(C₃H₇)₄(OH)₂]·C₁₄H₃₂N₄, derived from the tetrakis­(triiso­propyl­gallium)–1,4,8,11‐tetra­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane (1/1) adduct, consists of a centrosymmetric [ⁱPr₂Ga(μ‐OH)]₂ unit hydrogen bonded through the hydroxyl group to a nitro­gen on an adjacent centrosymmetric 1,4,8,11‐tetra­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane molecule, resulting in the generation of a molecular chain through the crystal.     

1,3‐Dibenzoylimidazolidine‐2‐thione and 1,3‐dibenzo­yl‐3,4,5,6‐tetra­hydro­pyrimidine‐2(1H)‐thione

The title compounds, 1,3‐dibenzo­ylimidazolidine‐2‐thione, C₁₇H₁₄N₂O₂S, (I), and 1,3‐dibenzo­yl‐3,4,5,6‐tetra­hydro­pyrimidine‐2(1H)‐thione, C₁₈H₁₆N₂O₂S, (II), were obtained from the reactions of imidazolidine‐2‐thione and 1,4,5,6‐tetra­hydro­pyrimidine‐2‐thiol, respectively, with benzoyl chloride. Compounds (I) and (II) contain, respectively, imidazolidinethione [C=S = 1.6509 (14) Å] and ­pyrimidinethione [C=S = 1.6918 (19) Å] moieties bonded to two benzoyl rings. The mol­ecules of (I) exhibit C₂ symmetry, the C=S bond lying along the twofold rotation axis, while the mol­ecules of (II) have mirror symmetry (C_s). The imida­zolidine ring in (I) is essentially planar, while the pyrimidine ring in (II) adopts a boat conformation. Mol­ecules of (I) are linked by weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions, while mol­ecules of (II) are held together by van der Waals inter­actions.     

2‐Nitroso‐1,3‐diphenyl‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydrobenzo[b][1,6]naphthyridine

The title compound, C₂₄H₁₉N₃O, crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/a with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. The tetra­hydro­pyridine ring has a boat conformation. The dihedral angle between the fused pyridine rings is 16.2 (1)°. The equatorial and axial orientations of the two phenyl groups with respect to the tetra­hydro­pyridine ring are confirmed. The nitroso group is coplanar with the attached C—N—C group. The interplanar angle formed between the fused tetra­hydro­pyridine and benzene planes is 13.4 (1)°. The crystal packing is stabilized by an intermolecular C—H⃛O hydrogen bond, which forms a C(9) graph‐set chain running along the [001] direction.     

An analysis of C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions in three substituted 4‐ketotetra­hydro­indoles

The crystal and molecular structures of the three 4‐ketotetrahydro­indoles 2‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐1‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)‐6,6‐dimethyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro‐1H‐indol‐4‐one (C₂₂H₁₉ClFNO), (I), 1‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)‐2‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐6,6‐di­methyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro‐1H‐indol‐4‐one (C₂₃H₂₂FNO₂), (II), and 6,6‐dimethyl‐1,2‐di­phenyl‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro‐1H‐indol‐4‐one (C₂₂H₂₁NO), (III), have been determined via single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction in order to study the intermolecular interactions therein. All three structures are stabilized via intermolecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions, generating different molecular motifs.     

9‐Phenyl‐3,4,4a,9a‐tetrahydrotri­ptycene and 9‐phenyl‐1,2,3,4,4a,9a‐hexa­hydro­triptycene

The structure of 9‐phenyl‐3,4,4a,9a‐tetra­hydro­triptycene, C₂₆H₂₂, (I), exhibits regiochemistry consistent with a stepwise mechanism for its formation from photo­cyclo­addition of 1,3‐cyclo­hexa­diene and 9‐phenyl­anthracene. Bond distances involving the bridgehead C atoms are similar in (I) and the hydrogenated derivative, 9‐phenyl‐1,2,3,4,4a,9a‐hexa­hydro­triptycene, C₂₆H₂₄, (II), with bonds to the quaternary‐C atoms exhibiting significant elongation [1.581 (2) Å in (I) and 1.585 (2) Å in (II)]. The molecular geometry precludes significant σ–π overlap between the phenyl groups and the interannular bonds in both compounds, indicating that the origin of the bond lengthening is steric in nature.     

N‐Benzyl­tetra­hydro­pyrido‐anellated thio­phene derivatives: new anti­cholinesterases

The title compounds, tert‐butyl 6‐benzyl‐2‐(3,3‐diethyl­ureido)‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro­thieno[2,3‐c]pyridine‐3‐carboxyl­ate, C₂₄H₃₃N₃O₃S, (I), 7‐benzyl‐2‐diethyl­amino‐5,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro‐3‐oxa‐9‐thia‐1,7‐diaza­fluoren‐4‐one, C₂₀H₂₃N₃O₂S, (II), and N‐(7‐benzyl‐4‐oxo‐5,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro‐4H‐3,9‐dithia‐1,7‐diaza­fluoren‐2‐yl)benzamide, C₂₃H₁₉N₃O₂S₂, (III), form monoclinic crystal systems. In (I) and (II), the mol­ecules are linked into a three‐dimensional framework by weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O=C hydrogen bonds, whereas in (III) stronger inter­molecular N—H⋯O=C inter­actions are observed. The conformation of (I) is further stabilized by an intra­molecular N—H⋯O=C hydrogen bond, which effects the planarity of the ureido­thio­phene­carboxyl­ate moiety.     

Two optically active iso­quinoline derivatives

In the two title optically active tetra­hydro­iso­quinoline derivatives, namely 3‐hydroxy­methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­hydro­isoquinolin‐2‐ium bromide methanol hemisolvate, C₁₆H₁₈NO⁺·Br^?·0.5CH₃OH, (IIb), and 2‐formyl‐3‐hydroxy­methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­hydro­iso­quinoline, C₁₇H₁₇NO₂, (III), the absolute configurations have been confirmed as 3R,4R by structure refinement using Bijvoet‐pair reflections. The hydroxy­methyl and phenyl groups in (IIb) are oriented in equatorial and pseudo‐equatorial positions, respectively, whereas in (III), the corresponding groups are in axial and pseudo‐axial positions, respectively; the hydroxy­methyl and phenyl groups are trans with respect to one another in both structures. The heterocyclic rings in (IIb) and (III) adopt envelope conformations inverted with respect to each other. In both structures, the mol­ecules are linked through hydrogen bonds.     

A 1,3,2‐ox­aza­borolidine dimer derived from (S)‐α,α‐di­phenyl­prolinol

The reaction of (S)‐α,α‐di­phenyl­prolinol with an excess of borane–tetra­hydro­furan complex yields a stable crystalline material with the composition C₃₄H₃₈B₂N₂O₂, which features a borane adduct of a spiro­cyclic structure with two ox­aza­borolidine rings joined by a central tetrahedral B atom. This dimeric ox­aza­borolidine complex, viz. 3,3,3′,3′‐tetra­phenyl‐1,1′‐spiro­bi(3a,4,5,6‐tetra­hydro‐3H‐pyrrolo­[1,2‐c][1,3,2]­ox­azaborole)–7‐borane, is the dominant product under various reaction conditions; its crystal structure is consistent with ¹¹B, ¹H and ¹³C NMR and IR analyses.     

Imino Diels–Alder adducts. I. Two furo­[3,2‐c]­quinoline diastereoisomers

The structures of two diastereoisomers of 9‐chloro‐8‐fluoro‐4‐phenyl‐2,3,3a,4,5,9b‐hexa­hydro­furo­[3,2‐c]­quinoline, C₁₇H₁₅ClFNO, are very similar. The orientation of the furan ring, as a result of its fusion to the quinoline nucleus, constitutes the significant difference between the two structures. The dihedral angles between the furan and phenyl rings are 73.4 (1) and 63.8 (1)°.     

Intermolecular stacking in pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine‐based pentamethylene‐linked flexible ­molecules

The crystal structures of 1‐{5‐[4,6‐bis­(methyl­sulfanyl)‐2H‐py­razolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidin‐2‐yl]­pentyl}‐6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐4‐(pyr­rolidin‐1‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine, C₂₂H₂₉N₉S₃, and 6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐1‐{5‐[6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐4‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐2H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidin‐2‐yl]­pentyl}‐4‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine, C₂₅H₃₄N₁₀S₂, which differ in having either a pyrrolidine substituent or a methylsulfanyl group, show intermolecular stacking due to aromatic π–π interactions between the pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine rings.     

()‐9‐(2‐Bromophenyl)‐7,7‐dimethyl‐1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9‐octahydrofuro[3,4‐b]quinoline‐1,8‐dione

The title compound, C₁₉H₁₈BrNO₃, has potential calcium modulatory properties. The 1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine ring has a very shallow boat conformation and is one of the most planar examples of this moiety. The 2‐bromo­phenyl substituent is in the axial synperiplanar orientation. The quinoline ring has a half‐chair conformation, with the unusual arrangement of the out‐of‐plane atom being on the opposite side of the ring plane to the bromo­phenyl substituent. The mol­ecules are linked into chains by intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

Three tetrahydroisoquinolinedione derivatives

N‐(2‐Chloro­benzyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­hydro­iso­quinoline‐1,3‐dione, C₁₆H₁₂ClNO₂, crystallizes in P2₁/n with three crystallographically independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, which differ slightly in conformation, N‐(2‐bromo‐4‐methyl­phenyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­hydro­iso­quinoline‐1,3‐dione, C₁₆H₁₂BrNO₂, crystallizes in P2₁/n with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit andN‐(2,3‐di­chloro­phenyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­hydro­iso­quinoline‐1,3‐dione, C₁₅H₉Cl₂NO₂, crystallizes in P2₁/c with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. In all three structures, the heterocyclic rings adopt approximately planar conformations. The pyridine rings are orthogonal to the substituted phenyl rings. In all three structures, the crystal packing is stabilized by intermolecular C—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Two carbamoyl‐substituted di­hydro­pyrimidines: potential mimics of di­hydro­pyridine calcium channel blockers

The structures of two conformationally similar 1,4‐di­hydro­pyrimidines with a novel carbamoyl substitution, viz. 6‐methyl‐5‐(N‐methyl­carbamoyl)‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydro­py­rimidine‐2‐thione monohydrate, C₁₃H₁₅N₃OS·H₂O, (I), and 4‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐6‐methyl‐5‐(N‐methyl­carbamoyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­hydro­pyrimidine‐2‐thione monohydrate, C₁₃H₁₄ClN₃OS·H₂O, (II), exhibit the structural features of 1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine calcium channel blockers. In both structures, the pyrimidine ring adopts a flattened boat conformation and the carbamoyl side chain is in an extended conformation with an anticlinal orientation. The phenyl ring occupies a pseudo‐axial position with respect to the pyrimidine ring in these structures. Both compounds crystallize with one mol­ecule of water, which participates in a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network. The mol­ecules are linked into dimers by N—H·S hydrogen bonds in both structures.     

A three‐dimensional open‐framework germanate containing four‐, five‐ and six‐coordinated germanium

A new three‐dimensional open‐framework germanate, namely ethylenediamine bis(ethylenediammonium) tetra­hydro­xo­octadecaoxononagermanate, (C₂H₈N₂)(C₂H₁₀N₂)₂[Ge₉O₁₈(OH)₄], has been synthesized hydro­thermally and its structure determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The framework is built of [Ge₉O₂₂(OH)₄] units formed by four‐, five‐ and six‐oxy­gen‐coordinated germanium and templated by ethyl­enedi­amine. Three types of intersecting channels are formed in the framework, one by eight‐membered rings running along the b axis and the other two by ten‐membered rings running parallel to the a and c axes, respectively.     

The diastereoisomers methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(R)/(S)‐methoxycarbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydropyrrol‐1‐ylcarbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydropyrazole‐3‐carboxylate

The title diastereoisomers, methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(S)‐methoxy­carbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetra­hydro­pyrrol‐1‐yl­carbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro­pyrazole‐3‐carboxyl­ate and methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(R)‐methoxycarbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydropyrrol‐1‐ylcarbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro­pyrazole‐3‐carboxylate, both C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅, have been studied in two crystalline forms. The first form, methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(S)‐methoxy­carbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydropyrrol‐1‐ylcarbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro­pyrazole‐3‐carboxyl­ate–methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(R)‐methoxy­carbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetra­hydro­pyrrol‐1‐yl­carbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydropyrazole‐3‐carboxylate (1/1), 2(S),5(S)‐C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅·2(R),5(S)‐C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅, contains both S,S and S,R isomers, while the second, methyl 5‐(S)‐[2‐(S)‐methoxycarbonyl)‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro­pyrrol‐1‐ylcarbonyl]‐1‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro­pyrazole‐3‐carboxyl­ate, 2(S),5(S)‐C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅, is the pure S,S isomer. The S,S isomers in the two structures show very similar geometries, the maximum difference being about 15° on one torsion angle. The differences between the S,S and S,R isomers, apart from those due to the inversion of one chiral centre, are more remarkable, and are partially due to a possible rotational disorder of the 2‐­(methoxycarbonyl)tetrahydropyrrole group.     

Three (E)‐2‐[(bromo­phen­yl)imino­meth­yl]‐4‐methoxy­phenols

The title compounds, (E)‐2‐[(2‐bromo­phenyl)imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (I), (E)‐2‐[(3‐bromo­phenyl)­imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (II), and (E)‐2‐[(4‐bromo­phenyl)imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (III), adopt the phenol–imine tautomeric form. In all three structures, there are strong intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Compound (I) has strong inter­molecular hydrogen bonds, while compound (III) has weak inter­molecular hydrogen bonds. In addition to these inter­molecular inter­actions, C—H⋯π inter­actions in (I) and (III), and π–π inter­actions in (I), play roles in the crystal packing. The dihedral angles between the aromatic rings are 15.34 (12), 6.1 (3) and 39.2 (14)° for (I), (II) and (III), respectively.