Counting acyclic hypergraphs

Acyclic hypergraphs are analogues of forests in graphs. They are very useful in the design of databases. The number of distinct acyclic uniform hypergraphs withn labeled vertices is studied. With the aid of the principle of inclusion-exclusion, two formulas are presented. One is the explicitformula for strict (d)-connected acyclic hypergraphs, the other is the recurrence formula for linear acyclic hypergraphs.     

Vertex coloring acyclic digraphs and their corresponding hypergraphs

We consider vertex coloring of an acyclic digraph in such a way that two vertices which have a common ancestor in receive distinct colors. Such colorings arise in a natural way when bounding space for various genetic data for efficient analysis. We discuss the corresponding down-chromatic number and derive an upper bound as a function of , the maximum number of descendants of a given vertex, and the degeneracy of the corresponding hypergraph. Finally, we determine an asymptotically tight upper bound of the down-chromatic number in terms of the number of vertices of and .     

Counting dense connected hypergraphs via the probabilistic method

In 1990 Bender, Canfield, and McKay gave an asymptotic formula for the number of connected graphs on with m edges, whenever and . We give an asymptotic formula for the number of connected r‐uniform hypergraphs on with m edges, whenever is fixed and with , that is, the average degree tends to infinity. This complements recent results of Behrisch, Coja‐Oghlan, and Kang (the case ) and the present authors (the case , ie, “nullity” or “excess” o(n)). The proof is based on probabilistic methods, and in particular on a bivariate local limit theorem for the number of vertices and edges in the largest component of a certain random hypergraph. The arguments are much simpler than in the sparse case; in particular, we can use “smoothing” techniques to directly prove the local limit theorem, without needing to first prove a central limit theorem.     

Counting acyclic digraphs by sources and sinks

We count labeled acyclic digraphs according to the number sources, sinks, and edges.     

Interval hypergraphs and D-interval hypergraphs

A hypergraph $\text{H = (V,}\text{E}\text{)}$ is called an interval hypergraph if there exists a one-to-one function ? mapping the elements of V to points on the real line such that for each edge E, there is an interval I, containing the images of all elements of E, but not the images of any elements not in E₁. The difference hypergraph D(H) determined by H is formed by adding to $\text{E}$ all nonempty sets of the form E₁ ? E₁, where E₁ and E₁ are edges of HH is said to be a D-interval hypergraph if D(H) is an interval hypergraph. A forbidden subhypergraph characterization of D-interval hypergraphs is given. By relating D-interval hypergraphs to dimension theory for posets, we determine all 3-irreducible posets of length one.     

Threshold hypergraphs

This paper deals with three generalizations of threshold graphs to hypergraphs proposed by M. Ch. Golumbic. Answering a question of M. Ch. Golumbic we show that these three definitions are not equivalent. The main results of the paper are Theorems 2.5 and 2.6 which characterize hypergraphs satisfying the most general of above definitions.     

Partitive hypergraphs

We define a new class of hypergraphs (partitive hypergraphs) which generalizes both, the set of all externally related subsets of a graph and the set of all committees of an hypergraph.We give a characterization of the partitive hypergraphs and moreover of those which are associated with hypergraphs or graphs.     

Quasi-random hypergraphs

We introduce an equivalence class of varied properties for hypergraphs. Any hypergraph possessing any one of these properties must of necessity possess them all. Since almost all random hypergraphs share these properties, we term these properties quasi-random. With these results, it becomes quite easy to show that many natural explicit constructions result in hypergraphs which imitate random hypergraphs in a variety of ways.     

Color-bounded hypergraphs, II: Interval hypergraphs and hypertrees

A color-bounded hypergraph is a hypergraph (set system) with vertex set X and edge set E={E₁,…,E_m}, together with integers s_i and t_i (1≤s_i≤t_i≤|E_i|) for i=1,…,m. A vertex coloring φ is feasible if the number of colors occurring in edge E_i satisfies s_i≤|φ(E_i)|≤t_i, for every i≤m.In this paper we point out that hypertrees-hypergraphs admitting a representation over a (graph) tree where each hyperedge E_i induces a subtree of the underlying tree-play a central role concerning the set of possible numbers of colors that can occur in feasible colorings. We also consider interval hypergraphs and circular hypergraphs, where the underlying graph is a path or a cycle, respectively. Sufficient conditions are given for a ‘gap-free’ chromatic spectrum; i.e., when each number of colors is feasible between minimum and maximum. The algorithmic complexity of colorability is studied, too.Compared with the ‘mixed hypergraphs’-where ‘D-edge’ means (s_i,t_i)=(2,|E_i|), while ‘C-edge’ assumes (s_i,t_i)=(1,|E_i|−1)-the differences are rather significant.     

Series-parallel chromatic hypergraphs

In this paper two-terminal series-parallel chromatic hypergraphs are introduced and for this class of hypergraphs it is shown that the chromatic polynomial can be computed with polynomial complexity. It is also proved that h-uniform multibridge hypergraphs θ(h;a₁,a₂,…,a_k) are chromatically unique for h≥3 if and only if h=3 and a₁=a₂=?=a_k=1, i.e., when they are sunflower hypergraphs having a core of cardinality 2 and all petals being singletons.     

Covers in hypergraphs

Let α(H) denote the stability number of a hypergraphH. The covering number ?(H) is defined as the minimal number of edges fromH to cover its vertex setV(H). The main result is the following extension of König’s wellknown theorem: If α(H′)≧|V(H′)|/2 holds for every section hypergraphH′ ofH then ?(H)≦α(H). This theorem is applied to obtain upper bounds on certain covering numbers of graphs and hypergraphs. In par ticular, we prove a conjecture of B. Bollobás involving the hypergraph Turán numbers.     

Independence in hypergraphs

Suppose an integral function (|A|)q₁ defined on the subsets of edges of a hypergraph (X,u,) satisfies the following two conditions: 1) any set W u such that |A|(|A|) for any AW is matroidally independent; 2) if W is an independent set, then there exists a unique partitionW=T₁+ T₂+...+T_v such that |T ⁱ |=(|T ⁱ |),i1:v, and for any AW, |A|(|A|) there exists a T_i such that AT_i. The form of such a function is found, in terms of parameters of generalized connected components, hypercycles, and hypertrees.Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov Leningradskogo Otdeleniya Matematicheskogo Instituta im. V. A. Steklova AN SSSR, Vol. 114, pp. 196–204, 1982.     

Sparse color-critical hypergraphs

In this paper we obtain estimates for the least number of edges ann-uniformr-color-critical hypergraph of orderm may have.