Contribution to the certification of B,Cd, Cu,Mg and Pb in a synthetic water sample,by use of isotope-dilution ICP-MS,for Comparison 12 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme

The contribution of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements to the certification of the B, Cd, Cu, Mg, and Pb content of a synthetic water sample used in Comparison 12 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) is described. The aim of the IMEP programme is to demonstrate objectively the degree of equivalence and quality of chemical measurements of individual laboratories on the international scene by comparing them with reference ranges traceable to the SI (Système International d'Unités). IMEP is organized in support of European Union policies and helps to improve the traceability of values produced by field chemical measurement laboratories. The analytical procedure used to establish the reference values for the B, Cd, Cu, Mg, and Pb content of the IMEP-12 sample is based on inductively coupled plasma-isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (ICP-IDMS) applied as a primary method of measurement. The measurements performed for the IMEP-12 study are described in detail. Focus is on the element boron, which is particularly difficult to analyze by ICP-MS because of potential problems of low sensitivity, high mass discrimination, memory effects, and abundance sensitivity. For each of the certified amount contents presented here a total uncertainty budget was calculated using the method of propagation of uncertainties according to ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and Eurachem guidelines. For all investigated elements with concentrations in the low micro g kg(-1) and mg kg(-1) range (corresponding to pmol kg(-1) to the high micro mol kg(-1) level), SI-traceable reference values with relative expanded uncertainties ( k=2) of less than 2 % were obtained.     

International Measurement Evaluation Programme: IMEP-9, trace elements in water

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme, founded, owned and coordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-9 is the third round of trace elements in water evaluation following IMEP-3 and IMEP-6. Reference values for 15 elements stating total concentrations and combined uncertainties (according to GUM) were established. The reference values were established mainly by isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) as a primary method of measurement, and values traceable to the SI were obtained. The four elements that could not be certified by IDMS were assigned values by means of other measurement techniques. Results from 201 laboratories from 35 countries and four continents were evaluated against the reference values and the comparability between the laboratories is presented graphically.     

SI-traceable certification of the IMEP-12 water sample combining contributions from different reference laboratories

In the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) comparison, a synthetically prepared water sample was offered to the analytical laboratories to perform measurements of As, B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni and Pb. The choice of elements to be measured was based on EU legislation, which the comparison was aiming to support. As to the IMEP policy, the laboratories’ results were presented according to the certified/assigned reference values established by several reference laboratories all around the world. The performed certification campaign is described in detail in this paper. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) was applied as a primary method of measurement (PMM), whenever possible, to achieve SI-traceable results. Apart from IDMS for reference measurements of some elements, k _o-neutron activation analysis (k _o-NAA) and external calibration (Ext-Calib) using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were applied. The reference values were characterised as “certified” (for B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ni and Pb) or “assigned” (for As and Mn) according to the IMEP policy. Measurement uncertainty of the certified/assigned reference values was calculated according to the ISO/BIPM guide using the specialised software GUM Workbench.     

SI-traceable certification of the IMEP-12 water sample combining contributions from different reference laboratories

In the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) comparison, a synthetically prepared water sample was offered to the analytical laboratories to perform measurements of As, B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni and Pb. The choice of elements to be measured was based on EU legislation, which the comparison was aiming to support. As to the IMEP policy, the laboratories’ results were presented according to the certified/assigned reference values established by several reference laboratories all around the world. The performed certification campaign is described in detail in this paper. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) was applied as a primary method of measurement (PMM), whenever possible, to achieve SI-traceable results. Apart from IDMS for reference measurements of some elements, k _o-neutron activation analysis (k _o-NAA) and external calibration (Ext-Calib) using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were applied. The reference values were characterised as “certified” (for B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ni and Pb) or “assigned” (for As and Mn) according to the IMEP policy. Measurement uncertainty of the certified/assigned reference values was calculated according to the ISO/BIPM guide using the specialised software GUM Workbench.

     

IMEP in support of the comparability of measurement results across the Romanian chemical metrology infrastructure

On the basis of quantitative chemical measurements many important decisions are made in support of legislation or in industrial processes or social aspects. For this reason it is important to improve the quality of chemical measurement results and thus make them comparable and acceptable everywhere. The measurement quality is important to enable an equivalent implementation of the European Union regulations and directives across an enlarged EU. In this context, the European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Reference Materials and Measurement (EC-JRC-IRMM) set up a programme to improve the scientific basis for metrology in chemistry (MiC) in EU candidate countries in the framework of EU enlargement. Several activities were initiated, such as training, fellowships, sponsoring of seminars, conferences and participation in interlaboratory comparisons. To disseminate measurement traceability, IRMM provides through its International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) an interlaboratory tool to enable the benchmarking of laboratory performance. IMEP emphasizes the metrological aspects of measurement results, such as traceability and measurement uncertainty. In this way it has become a publicly available European tool for MiC. The Romanian Bureau of Legal Metrology – National Institute of Metrology (BRML-INM) actively supports the participation of Romanian authorized and field laboratories in IMEP interlaboratory comparisons. This paper describes the interest of Romanian laboratories participating in this programme, the analytical and metrological problems that became relevant during these exercises and some actions for improvement. The results from Romanian laboratories participating in IMEP-12 (water), IMEP-16 (wine), IMEP-17 (human serum) and IMEP-20 (tuna fish) are presented. To conclude, the educational and training activities at national level organized jointly by the Romanian National Institute of Metrology (INM) and IRMM are also mentioned.     

The interlaboratory comparison "IMEP-19 trace elements in rice"—a new approach for measurement performance evaluation

The aim of IMEP is to present objectively the quality of chemical measurements. Participants in IMEP compare their reported measurement results with independent external certified reference values with demonstrated traceability and uncertainty, as evaluated according to international guidelines. IMEP-19 focused on measurements of trace elements in rice aiming to support the Commission Regulation (EC) No. 466/2001 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuff. Measurement results for the elements Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn were reported by 267 field laboratories involved in food analysis from 43 countries. Performance criteria for the evaluation of the reported measurement results in IMEP-19 are suggested. The chosen performance indicators not only take into account the deviation of the reported measurement value from the certified reference value, but also set criteria for maximum and minimum acceptable uncertainty. The IMEP-19 participants' performance is reviewed by means of using new simple graphical tools, called "Naji plots".     

Establishment of SI-traceable reference values for the content of various elements in the IMEP-14 sediment sample

For the first time in the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP)-14, a sediment sample was offered to analytical laboratories to perform measurements of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Hg, Ni, U and Zn. In line with IMEP policy, the results were presented according to the certified / assigned reference values established by several reference laboratories around the world. The certification campaign is described in detail. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry was applied as a primary method of measurement, whenever possible, to achieve SI-traceable results. For reference measurements of As, Fe, Hg and Zn, k₀-neutron activation analysis and Zeeman atomic absorption spectrometry were applied. The reference values (ranges) were characterised as ”certified” (for Cd, Cr, Pb, Ni and U) or ”assigned” (for As, Cu, Fe, Hg and Zn) according to IMEP policy. The measurement uncertainty of the certified / assured reference values was calculated according to the ISO/BIPM Guide. Received: 7 June 2001-10-27 Accepted: 19 August 2001     

IMEP-12: trace elements in water; objective evaluation of the performance of the laboratories when measuring quality parameters prescribed in the European Directive 98/83/EC

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme, founded, owned and co-ordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-12, for the fourth time in the series, focused on trace elements in water and it was designed specifically to support European Commission directive 98/83/EC. Reference values for the concentration of ten elements were established with expanded uncertainties according to GUM. In total, 348 laboratories from 46 countries in five continents participated in the comparison and the degree of equivalence between the results of the laboratories and the reference values is presented graphically. Samples from the same batch were distributed to ten laboratories from European Countries, which represented their country in the framework of the EUROMET project 528. Participation in this comparison was offered to the European Co-operation for Accreditation (EA) for participation of accredited laboratories from all over Europe in the framework of the collaboration between IRMM and EA and to laboratories from the EU new member states and acceding countries in the frame of IRMM’s ‘Metrology in Chemistry support program for EU new member states and acceding countries.’     

The IRMM – International Measurement Evaluation Programme,IMEP

 The aim of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to give an objective picture of the state-of-the-practice (SoP) of chemical measurements in field laboratories by comparing them to a reference range that contains a value that is as traceable to the SI system of measurements (in this case to the Avogadro Constant, one of the best realizations of the mole so far), as can presently be achieved, but which in any case is independent of human or political decision. Thus, a large-scale field test has been made to realize (international) comparability of these measurements by providing them with an independent scientific common basis. In the third measurement round, IMEP-3, ten trace elements, B, Ca, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Pb, Rb and Zn were measured in a synthetic and in a natural water by about 155 participating laboratories using their routine methods. The (coded) results are graphically reported and compared to certified reference values, established by IRMM and NIST, using isotope specific methods (isotope dilution mass spectrometry and neutron activation analysis), wherever possible. One of these methods (IDMS) has recently been defined as a primary method of measurement by the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance (Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière: CCQM) in its founding meeting in April 1995 at BIPM, Paris. Results indicate a spread of more than ±50%, asymmetrically distributed around the reference range, although the declared accuracy was 5–10%. Self-assessment by participants of their analytical capabilities does not show a high correlation between a self-rating ("more experienced" or "less experienced") and actual performance. In the way they have been applied, all methods seem to produce results of approximately the same quality. There is little reduction in the spread of the measurements if the results obtained for one element in the natural water B are divided by the results obtained for the same element in the synthetic water A (which was unknowingly, a reference material). Index entries International measurement evaluation programme (IMEP).     

International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP); IMEP-14: Picturing the performance of analytical laboratories measuring trace elements in sediment

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme founded, owned and co-ordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-14, for the first time in the series, is focusing on trace elements in sediment. Reference values for ten elements stating total concentrations and expanded uncertainties according to GUM were established. In total, 239 laboratories from 43 countries in five continents participated in the comparison, and the degree of equivalence between the results from the laboratories and the reference values is presented graphically. Identical samples were distributed to nine National Measurement Institutes within the frame of the CCQM-P15 pilot study. Participation in the IMEP-14 interlaboratory comparison was offered to laboratories in the EU new member states and acceding countries according to the IRMMs Metrology in Chemistry support programme for EU new member states and acceding countries.This revised version was published online in August 2004 with corrections to text especially to the Discussion section.     

One way of disseminating reference values with demonstrated traceability and demonstrated uncertainty to field laboratories: IMEP

An operational interlaboratory comparison programme is described which disseminates SI-traceable reference values to laboratories worldwide. These reference values have an uncertainty and traceability that is demonstrated at the highest metrological level. Participating laboratories can use these values to establish the degree of equivalence of their measurement results and can use this to support their measurement capability claims, e.g. towards third parties. The programme has been run by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988, in the first phase as an awareness programme. Currently, IRMM is focusing its efforts on educational aspects of metrology via a collaboration with the European Co-operation for Accreditation, national metrological institutes (NMIs) and interested academic networks. The viewgraphs used are presented in the “Electronic Supplementary Material” of this ACQUAL issue.     

Evaluation of laboratory performance in IMEP water interlaboratory comparisons

The aim of International Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to present objectively the quality of chemical measurements. Participants in IMEP compare their reported measurement results with independent external certified reference values with demonstrated traceability and uncertainty, as evaluated according to international guidelines. Three major interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs), IMEP-6, IMEP-9 and IMEP-12, on trace elements in water were carried out from 1994 to 2000. Participants' results for Cd, Fe and Pb concentrations from these three different IMEP water ILCs were compared by means of suitable performance indicators. The performance evaluation criteria were set according to the requirements stated in the Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Two different performance indicators were selected for evaluation of the individual participants' results: the commonly used z-score and the not so well-known E _n number. The group performance indicator is based on the variation of z-scores. To assess the individual measurement performance, not only the deviation of the reported measurement values from the certified reference value, but also criteria for maximum and minimum acceptable uncertainties were taken into account. The participants' performance is also reviewed by means of using a simple graphical tool, called “Naji-plots”.     

What is new in certified reference materials and measurements at IRMM?

IRMM is developing more and more isotopic spike reference materials since these are increasingly needed in trace analysis. In addition, they appear to play an increasingly important role in ensuring traceability to the SI system of isotope-specific measurements made by e.g. isotope dilution mass spectometry (IDMS). Their present availability and future development is summarised. IDMS is also applied in a definitive way to establish reference measurements for IRMM's international measurement evaluation programme (IMEP), which aims at the realisation of traceability for field laboratories. IRMM uses its advanced technology for the preparation and contamination-free handling of large quantities of biological and environmental reference materials. These facilities are used for the preparation of both BCR CRM's (orange juice, sheep milk curd, sediments, etc.) and reference materials for private customers (catalytic converter materials, apple powder, flour, animal innards, tomato powder, etc.).     

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme,IMEP-8: carbon and oxygen isotope ratios in CO<Subscript>2</Subscript>

In IMEP-8, two samples of high purity CO(2)(g), with different carbon and oxygen isotope ratios were distributed to 27 participants, originating from 14 countries and from various isotopic measurement domains (geochemistry, atmospheric and food chemistry), but particularly set up for food laboratories. In total 19 laboratories reported results. The outcome of this comparison exercise shows that the laboratories reported carbon and oxygen isotope results in good agreement with the reference values across the domains. The reported results for delta(13)C(VPDB) (carbon) for both materials are within 1 per thousand. However, for the reported results of delta(18)O(VPDB) (oxygen) for both materials the overall spread of the reported results is about 11 per thousand. Within this spread two distinct groups of participants can be identified, where the results within each group vary about 2 per thousand. The latter seems to be caused by calculation errors by participants of the reporting delta(18)O(VPDB) values. As requested, participants also reported the isotope amount ratio for carbon and oxygen in the CO(2) samples. For carbon, all reported results for both materials agree with the isotope ratio value, which can be traced back to the value reported by Craig. For oxygen, all results are in good agreement and deviate by a maximum of 0.5% from the reference values measured at IRMM. Work carried out indicates the carbon isotope ratio, for both samples IMEP-8A and IMEP-8B, differ from those reported by Craig by as much as 1.2%. In the case of oxygen, this deviation is far smaller. Both data sets, i.e. the one realised by Craig and the one realised at IRMM, demonstrate traceability to SI. It is clear that both values significantly disagree.     

The IRMM International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) IMEP-4: Trace elements (Li, Cu, Zn) in serum

The aim of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to give an objective picture of state-of-the-practice analytical measurements by comparing them to a reference value obtained by a primary method of measurement. The referencevalue is therefore as traceable to the SI system of measurements as can presently be achieved and is independent of human or political decisions. Thus a large scale field test is made to achieve (international) comparability of measurements by comparing them with an independent metrologically established value. In the fourth measurement round, IMEP-4, three trace elements, Li, Cu and Zn, at three different levels in (bovine) serum were measured by about 12 participating laboratories using their routine methods. The (coded) results are graphically reported and compared to certified reference values established by an isotope-specific method, isotope dilution mass spectrometry, defined as a primary method of measurement by the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance. Results indicate a spread of more than ±50%, asymmetrically distributed around the reference value with its own uncertainty range, although the self-declared accuracy of the laboratories was 5–10%. Self-assessment by participants of their analytical capabilities does not show a high correlation between self-rating ("more experienced" or "less experienced") and actual performance. In the way they have been applied, all methods seem to produce results of approximately the same quality.     

IMEP-24 analysis of eight trace elements in toys

The International Measurement Evaluation Program (IMEP) organised the IMEP-24 interlaboratory comparison after reports in the media about high levels of lead in toys. The aim of this comparison was to verify the laboratories’ capacity to evaluate trace-element levels in a possible toy-like material according to the European Standard EN 71-3:1994. As test material, it used a former certified reference material containing levels of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead and selenium around the limits set in the standard.Four expert laboratories confirmed the reference values (Xref) for all elements but Hg, and established a reference value for Hg. The scatter of the results reported by the participants was large, as expected, but showed a close to normal distribution around the reference values for five of the eight trace elements. The spread of results was mainly attributed to sampling and sample preparation.One major issue observed in this exercise was the lack of legislative rules about how to report the result, or, more specifically, the use of the analytical correction, which was introduced in EN 71-3:1994 to achieve consistent interpretation of results and which is to be applied when values are equal to or above the maximum limits set in the standard. Its application by the participants was very inconsistent and led to problems in their evaluation. There is clearly a need for clarification and for more formal regulations with regard to result reporting in order to minimise the risk of confusion.Participants were also asked to give their opinion with regard to the acceptability of the test material for the market. The majority correctly considered the material as non-compliant. However, almost one-third incorrectly assessed the material as compliant.     

IMEP-24 analysis of eight trace elements in toys

The International Measurement Evaluation Program (IMEP) organized the IMEP-24 interlaboratory comparison after reports in the media about high levels of lead in toys. The aim of this comparison was to verify the laboratories’ capacity to evaluate trace-element levels in a possible toy-like material according to the European Standard EN 71-3:1994. As test material, it used a former certified reference material containing levels of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead and selenium around the limits set in the standard.Four expert laboratories confirmed the reference values (Xref) for all elements but Hg, and established a reference value for Hg. The scatter of the results reported by the participants was large, as expected, but showed a close to normal distribution around the reference values for five of the eight trace elements. The spread of results was mainly attributed to sampling and sample preparation.One major issue observed in this exercise was the lack of legislative rules about how to report the result, or, more specifically, the use of the analytical correction, which was introduced in EN 71-3:1994 to achieve consistent interpretation of results and which is to be applied when values are equal to or above the maximum limits set in the standard. Its application by the participants was very inconsistent and led to problems in their evaluation. There is clearly a need for clarification and for more formal regulations with regard to result reporting in order to minimize the risk of confusion.Participants were also asked to give their opinion with regard to the acceptability of the test material for the market. The majority correctly considered the material as non-compliant. However, almost one-third incorrectly assessed the material as compliant.     

“Demonstration” vs. “designation” of measurement competence: the need to link accreditation to metrology

Formal acceptance of the results of chemical laboratories is increasingly organized through a) accreditation of measuring laboratories nationally and b) mutual recognition of accreditation internationally (through formal Multilateral Recognition Agreements, MRAs). However, real comparability of results of measurements is realized by using common (internationally agreed) measurement scales which make these results traceable to this scale, i.e. “traceable” to the same (internationally agreed) value of the unit of that scale. In addition, the criterion against which the evaluation is done, should be “external” to the measurement laboratories which are being evaluated. This is realized in IRMM’s International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) where evaluation is performed against values which are anchored using “metrology”, the science of measurement with its own rules, which offers a sound foundation for measurement in all scientific disciplines. It is argued in this paper that the demonstration of measurement capability against values on such scales provides a result-oriented rather than a procedure-oriented evaluation. Thus, competence can be “demonstrated” rather than just “designated” and this can be shown to both customers and regulators. It inspires more confidence.     

Contribution to the certification of B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U in a natural water sample for the International Measurement Evaluation Programme Round 9 (IMEP-9) using ID-ICP-MS

 The present paper describes the contribution of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements to the certification of B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U amount contents in a natural water sample, in round 9 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-9). The analytical procedure to establish the reference values for B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U amount contents was based on isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry used as a primary method of measurement. Applying this procedure reference values, traceable to the SI, were obtained for the natural water sample of IMEP-9. For each of the certified amount contents presented here a total uncertainty budget was calculated using the method of propagation of uncertainties according to ISO and EURACHEM guidelines. The measurement procedures, as well as the uncertainty calculations are described for all seven elements mentioned above. In order to keep the whole certification process transparent and so traceable, the preparations of various reagents and materials as well as the sample treatment and blending, the measurements themselves, and finally the data treatment are described in detail. Explanations focus on Pb as a representative example. The total uncertainties (relative) obtained were less than 2% for all investigated elements at amount contents in the pmol/kg up to the high μmol/kg range, corresponding to low μg/kg and mg/kg levels. Received: 21 October 1999 / Accepted: 29 January 2000