Methacrylic acid and methyl methacrylate oligomers adsorbed to porous isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) ultrathin films and mechanistic studies of living template polymerization

Methacrylic acid (MAA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), methacrylamide, and oligomers of MAA and MMA were selected as a model of active radical species in living template polymerization using stereocomplex formation. The adsorption behaviors of the aforementioned model compounds were examined toward porous isotactic‐(it‐) poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) ultrathin films on a quartz crystal microbalance, which was prepared by the extracting of syndiotactic‐(st‐) poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) from it‐PMMA/st‐PMAA stereocomplexes. The apparent predominant adsorption of oligomers to monomers was observed in both PMAA and PMMA oligomers, suggesting that the mechanism of template polymerization follows the pick up mechanism. Although vinyl monomers were not incorporated into the porous it‐PMMA ultrathin film, both PMMA and PMAA oligomers were adsorbed at the initial stages. However, adsorbed amounts were limited to about 5 and 15% at 0.1 mol L^?1, respectively, which are much smaller values than corresponding st‐polymers. The results imply that radical coupling reaction is prevented during template polymerization to support the resulting living polymerization. ATR‐IR spectral patterns of oligomer complexes and it‐PMMA slightly changed in both cases, suggesting complex formation. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 5879–5886, 2008     

Specific recognition of syndiotactic poly(methacrylic acid) in porous isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) thin films based on the effects of stereoregularity,temperature, and solvent

The effects of stereoregularity, temperature, and solvent on the specific recognition of syndiotactic (st)‐poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) in macromolecularly porous isotactic (it)‐poly(methyl methacrylate) films were investigated to give important insights into the regularity and stability of nanospaces in the it‐PMMA films as well as template polymerization. The porous it‐PMMA films were fabricated on quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) substrates via the layer‐by‐layer (LbL) assembly of it‐PMMA/st‐PMAA, plus the st‐PMAA extraction from the assembly. QCM analysis and infrared spectroscopy revealed the first case of stereocomplex formation using st‐PMAA with lower stereoregularity (rr = 73%) in the LbL films, while st‐PMAA obtained with conventional free radical polymerization (rr = 62%) was barely incorporated into the porous it‐PMMA films. The maximum st‐PMAA incorporation increased from 25 to 40 °C, but there were almost no difference between 40 and 55 °C, indicating that the it‐PMMA crystallization would also be accelerated with increasing temperature. The studies on st‐PMAA incorporation with various complexing solvents revealed that the host it‐PMMA in the porous films could only form the original stereocomplex with 2/1 unit‐molar stoichiometry (st‐PMAA/it‐PMMA) in acetonitrile/water or ethanol/water. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 3651–3657, 2010     

Thermal stability of porous it‐PMMA thin film obtained by the extraction of st‐PMAA from it‐PMMA/st‐PMAA stereocomplex with layer‐by‐layer assembly on a substrate

The functionality of porous isotactic (it) poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin films, which were previously developed by the selective extraction of syndiotactic (st) poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) from the it‐PMMA/st‐PMAA stereocomplex thin film on a substrate using the layer‐by‐layer assembly method was investigated after thermal treatment (70, 80, and 90 °C) in water for 4 h. Quartz crystal microbalance analysis and infrared spectra measurements revealed that the st‐PMAA incorporation ability of the porous it‐PMMA thin film decreased in order at 80 and 90 °C, while there was no decrease observed at 70 °C. X‐ray diffraction analysis also supported the thermal stability of the porosity at 70 °C, whereas two it‐PMMA crystalline peaks (2θ = 9° and 14°) were generated during heating at 90 °C. The loss of the functionality of the it‐PMMA thin film was thus shown to be due to crystallization, which was caused by the increase in polymer‐chain mobility during the heating process. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 3265–3270, 2010     

Nanospace preparation by crosslinking helical syndiotactic‐poly(methacrylic acid) in acetonitrile/water after stereocomplexation

Various molecular weights of isotactic (it‐)‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and syndiotactic (st‐)‐poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) were used to form an it‐PMMA/st‐PMAA (1/2) stereocomplex in acetonitrile/water as a suspension. The stereocomplex was tentatively crosslinked with 1,11‐diamino‐3‐6‐9‐trioxaundecane and water soluble carbodiimide at 10, 20, and 40 mol % concentrations versus MAA unit. The it‐PMMA was extracted from the crosslinked stereocomplex under alkaline conditions, and the successive re‐incorporation of the it‐PMMA was carried out. During the extraction and re‐incorporation processes, the FTIR/ATR spectra showed the absence and generation of a peak at 860 cm^?1, respectively, which was characteristic of this stereocomplex. The result of the XRD analysis also corresponded with the extraction and re‐incorporation behavior of it‐PMMA; peaks were observed at 2θ = 12 and 15°, d = 0.74 and 0.59 nm, respectively. This study showed that the nanospaces of helical st‐PMAA were available in acetonitrile/water in a suspended state using a crosslinking approach. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

Synthesis and characteristics of poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid)/poly(methacrylic acid‐co‐N‐isopropylacrylamide) thermosensitive semi‐hollow latex particles and their application to drug carriers

In this work, the poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid)/poly(methacrylic acid‐co‐N‐isopropylacrylamide) thermosensitive composite semi‐hollow latex particles was synthesized by three processes. The first process was to synthesize the poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid) (poly (MMA‐MAA)) copolymer latex particles by the method of soapless emulsion polymerization. The second process was to polymerize methacrylic acid (MAA), N‐isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm), and crosslinking agent, N,N′‐methylenebisacrylamide, in the presence of poly(MMA‐MAA) latex particles to form the linear poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid)/crosslinking poly(methacrylic acid‐co‐N‐isopropylacrylamide) (poly(MMA‐MAA)/poly(MAA‐NIPAAm)) core–shell latex particles with solid structure. In the third process, part of the linear poly(MMA‐MAA) core of core–shell latex particles was dissolved by ammonia to form the poly(MMA‐MAA)/poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) thermosensitive semi‐hollow latex particles. The morphologies of the semi‐hollow latex particles show that there is a hollow zone between the linear poly(MMA‐MAA) core and the crosslinked poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) shell. The crosslinking agent and shell composition significantly influenced the lower critical solution temperature of poly(MMA‐MAA)/poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) semi‐hollow latex particles. Besides, the poly(MMA‐MAA)/poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) thermosensitive semi‐hollow latex particles were used as carriers to load with the model drug, caffeine. The processes of caffeine loaded into the semi‐hollow latex particles appeared four situations, which was different from that of solid latex particles. In addition, the phenomenon of caffeine released from the semi‐hollow latex particles was obviously different from that of solid latex particles. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 3441–3451     

Synthesis of methacrylate derivatives oligomers by dithiobenzoate‐RAFT‐mediated polymerization

Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) was used to synthesize methacrylic acid oligomers and oligo(methacrylic acid)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMAA‐b‐PMMA) with targeted degree of polymerization ≈ 10. Characterization is by size‐exclusion chromatography (SEC) and electrospray mass‐spectrometry. SEC data are presented as hydrodynamic volume distributions (HVDs), the only proper means to present comparative and meaningful SEC data when there is no unique relationship between size and molecular weight. The RAFT agent, (4‐cyanopentanoic acid)‐4‐dithiobenzoate (CPADB), produced dithiobenzoic acid as a side product during the polymerization of methacrylate derivatives. Precipitation in diethyl ether proved to be an easy way to remove this impurity from the PMAA‐RAFT oligomers. Both unpurified and purified macro‐RAFT agent were used to prepare amphiphilic PMAA‐b‐PMMA copolymers. Diblock copolymer prepared from the purified PMAA homopolymer had a narrower HVD in comparison to those obtained from the equivalent unpurified macro‐RAFT agent. This work shows that while cyanoisopropyl‐dithiobenzoate or CPADB are good RAFT agents for methacrylate derivatives, they exhibit some instability under typical polymerization conditions, and thus when oligomers are targeted, optimal control requires checking for the degradation product and appropriate purification steps when necessary (the same effect is present for larger polymers but is unimportant). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 2277–2289, 2008     

Synthesis and characteristics of poly(methacrylic acid‐co‐N‐isopropylacrylamide) thermosensitive composite hollow latex particles and their application as drug carriers

In this work, the poly(methacrylic acid‐co‐N‐isopropylacrylamide) thermosensitive composite hollow latex particles was synthesized by a three‐step reaction. The first step was to synthesize the poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid) (poly(MMA‐MAA)) copolymer latex particles by the method of soapless emulsion polymerization. The second step was to polymerize methacrylic acid (MAA), N‐isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm), and N,N′‐methylenebisacrylamide in the presence of poly(MMA‐MAA) latex particles to form the linear poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid)/crosslinking poly(methacrylic acid‐co‐N‐isopropylacrylamide) (poly(MMA‐MAA)/poly(MAA‐NIPAAm)) core–shell latex particles. In the third step, the core–shell latex particles were heated in the presence of ammonia solution to form the crosslinking poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) thermosensitive hollow latex particles. The morphologies of poly(MMA‐MAA)/poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) core–shell latex particles and poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) hollow latex particles were observed. The influences of crosslinking agent and shell composition on the lower critical solution temperature of poly(MMA‐MAA)/poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) core–shell latex particles and poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) hollow latex particles were, respectively, studied. Besides, the poly(MAA‐NIPAAm) thermosensitive hollow latex particles were used as carriers to load with the model drug, caffeine. The effect of various variables on the amount of caffeine loading and the efficiency of caffeine release was investigated. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2013 , 51, 5203–5214     

Self‐assembly of a triblock terpolymer mediated by hydrogen‐bonded complexes

A poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(4‐vinylpyridine)‐block‐polystyrene (PMMA‐b‐P4VP‐b‐PS) triblock terpolymer is synthesized by ATRP to study its self‐assembly with PAA in organic solvents. The self‐assembly behavior of this system is compared with the one of a mixture of two diblocks, namely polystyrene‐block‐poly(4‐vinylpyridine) (PS‐b‐P4VP) and poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(methacrylic acid) (PMMA‐b‐PMAA). For both systems, formation of hydrogen‐bonded complexes between the P4VP and PMAA or PAA blocks occurs. These complexes become insoluble in the solvent used and micelles with a P4VP/P(M)AA complexes core surrounded by PS and PMMA coronal chains are obtained in both cases. These micelles are analyzed by DLS and TEM. Spherical micelles are formed for both systems but the hydrodynamic radii obtained for the two types of micelles are different. Indeed, the micelles formed by the PMMA‐b‐P4VP‐b‐PS + PAA system are smaller than those observed for the PS‐b‐P4VP + PMMA‐b‐PMAA system. Finally, the effect of the molar ratio of the P4VP/PMAA complexing blocks is investigated. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2015 , 53, 459–467     

Mechanism of preparing monodisperse poly(acrylamide/methacrylic acid) microspheres in ethanol. I

The precipitation polymerization of acrylamide/methacrylic acid (AAm/MAA) in ethanol (EtOH) was thoroughly investigated from detecting the homogeneity of the initial solution prior to polymerizations to the final products of the polymerizations. Dynamic light scattering and scanning electron microscopy were employed for the investigations. The solutions of AAm and AAm/acrylic acid (AAm/AA) were homogeneous. However, the solutions of AAm/MAA, AAm/poly(MAA) (PMAA), and AAm/poly(AA) (PAA) were not homogeneous as they are usually considered to be: entities with size distributions of around 150, 40, and 17 nm, respectively, were detected at the polymerization temperature of 60 °C. Accordingly, analogous to the entities that are similar to the structure of micelles formed in the solutions of AAm/PMAA and AAm/PAA because of polymer–AAm interactions, it was suggested that the complexes of AAm/MAA stemming from the molecular interactions, particularly the (lypo‐) hydrophobic interaction, aggregated to form minimonomer droplets at 60 °C. The monodisperse microspheres were prepared only in the AAm/MAA‐EtOH systems, whereas the microspheres were not prepared in the homogeneous AAm‐EtOH systems despite the precipitation of PAAm. The results obtained from various polymerizations showed that the microspheres originated from the polymerization within the minimonomer droplets. A new mechanism was established that describes the processes for the formation of all products possibly generated in the AAm‐MAA‐EtOH polymerization system. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 2823–2832, 2004     

Fast fabrication of superabsorbent polyampholytic nanocomposite hydrogels via plasma‐ignited frontal polymerization

We report the facile synthesis of poly(VI‐co‐MAA) superabsorbent polyampholytic hydrogels (VI = N‐vinylimidazole, MAA = methacrylic acid) via plasma‐ignited frontal polymerization (PIFP). On igniting the top surface of the reactants with air plasma, frontal polymerization occurred and poly(VI‐co‐MAA) hydrogels were obtained within minutes. The preparation parameters were investigated, along with swelling capacity, morphology, and chemical structures of poly(VI‐co‐MAA) hydrogels. Interestingly, the hydrogels are superabsorbent in water and show ampholytic characteristic toward pH. Moreover, the hydrogels are able to capture cationic dyes through electrostatic interaction, offering the potential for further development as dye adsorbents for water purification. In addition, nanocomposite hydrogels were obtained by embedding quantum dots (carbon dots or CdS nanocrystals) into the polymer matrix, which endows the nanocomposite hydrogels with favorable fluorescence and potential applications in bioimaging and biosensing. The results indicate that FP can be applied as an alternative means for facile synthesis of multifunctional hydrogels with additional efficiency and energy‐saving. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 912–920     

Stereocomplex formation of isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) with a wide variety of syndiotactic polymethacrylates

Syndiotactic (st–) polymers of methacrylates with primary and secondary ester groups, prepared by the syndiotactic-specific living polymerization with t-C₄H₉Li/R₃Al, were found to form stereocomplexes with isotactic (it–) poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) by annealing in the solid state or by mixing in certain solvents such as acetone and toluene. Melting points of the complexes depend on the structure of the ester group and can be changed in a wide range of temperature. st–Polymers of tertiary esters did not form the complex. Effects of anneal conditions, molecular weight, and tacticity on the melting point of the complex were studied in some detail for the combination of st–poly(benzyl methacrylate) and it–PMMA. st–Random copolymers of MMA with several alkyl methacrylates also formed stereocomplexes with it–PMMA, whose melting point could be changed continuously by changing the composition in a certain range of temperature. st–Block copolymers of PMMA and poly(benzyl methacrylate) formed stereocomplexes with it–PMMA which showed two melting points, provided the block lengths are long enough for the two types of the com plexes to form independently. Stereoblock PMMA, it–PMMA–block–st–PMMA, and stereoblock copolymer, it–PMMA–block–st–poly(butyl methacrylate), were found to form stereocomplexes more easily than the corresponding mixtures. The stereoregular uniform PMMAs were used for elucidating the process of stereocomplex formation and its stoichiometry by means of gelpermeation chromatography (GPC). The preliminary results clearly indicated that the complexation occurs mainly in 1:1 stoichiometry in the beginning, while a small fraction of 1:2 (it–: st–) complex was also formed concomitantly. By similar GPC experiments using a series of uniform PMMAs, the minimum length of PMMA chains for the complex formation was found to be in the range of degrees of polymerization from 42 to 46.     

Preparation of poly(n‐butyl acrylate)‐b‐polystyrene particles by emulsifier‐free,organotellurium‐mediated living radical emulsion polymerization (emulsion TERP)

We have successfully demonstrated the preparation of poly(n‐butyl acrylate)‐b‐polystyrene particles without any coagulation by two‐step emulsifier‐free, organotellurium‐mediated living radical emulsion polymerization (emulsion TERP) using poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA)–methyltellanyl (TeMe) (PMAA₃₀‐TeMe) (degree of polymerization of PMAA, 30) and 4,4′‐azobis(4‐cyanovaleric acid) (V‐501). The final particle size was ～30 nm and second particle nucleation was not observed throughout the polymerization. M_n increased linearly in both steps with conversion and blocking efficiency was ～75%. PDI was improved by increasing radical entry frequency into each polymer particle due to an increase of the polymerization temperature. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

Synthesis and stability of BODIPY‐based fluorescent polymer brushes at different pHs

We report a simple strategy for the grafting of poly(methacrylic acid) [poly(MAA)] brushes from silicon substrate by surface‐initiated RAFT polymerization and the subsequent coupling of BODIPY to these brushes to render them fluorescent. The poly(MAA) brushes were first generated by functionalization of hydrogen‐terminated silicon substrate with methyl‐10‐undecenoate which both leads to the formation of an organic layer covalently linked to the surface via Si? C bonds without detectable reaction of the carboxylate groups and couples to the polymerization initiator, followed by surface‐initiated RAFT polymerization of tert‐butyl methacrylate from these substrate‐bound initiator centers, and finally conversion of tert‐butyl groups to carboxylic acid groups. The poly(MAA) brushes were then made fluorescent by grafting a BODIPY derivative via an ester linkage. The stability of the BODIPY‐based fluorescent polymer brushes in buffer solutions at pH 6.0 to 12.0 with added salt was investigated by ellipsometry, fluorescence microscopy, grazing angle‐Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The results of these measurements indicated that the organic molecule‐initiator bond (ester linkage) is unstable and can be hydrolyzed resulting in detaching of the immobilized polymer from the silicon substrate. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 3586–3596     

Slow ester side‐group flips in glassy poly(alkyl methacrylate)s characterized by centerband‐only detection of exchange nuclear magnetic resonance

Slow side‐group dynamics in a series of five poly(alkyl methacrylate)s with various side‐group sizes [poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA), poly(isobutyl methacrylate) (PiBMA), and poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate), with ? H, ? CH₃, ? CH₂CH₃, ? CH₂CH(CH₃)₂, and ? cyclohexyl alkyl substituents (CODEX), respectively] were studied quantitatively by centerband‐only detection of exchange nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Flips and small‐angle motions of the ester groups associated with the β relaxation were observed distinctly in the CODEX NMR data, and the fraction of slowly flipping groups was measured with a precision of 3%. In PMMA, 34% of the side groups flipped on a 1‐s timescale, whereas the fraction was 31% in PEMA at 25 °C. Even the large isobutylether and cyclohexylester side groups flipped in the glassy state, although the flipping fraction was reduced to 22 and about 10%, respectively. In PMAA, no slow side‐group flips were detected on the 1‐s timescale. A striking difference in the temperature dependence of the flipping fraction in PMMA versus PEMA and PiBMA was observed. In PMMA, the flipping fraction was temperature‐independent between 25 and 80 °C, whereas in PEMA, it increased continuously from 31 to 60% between 25 and 60 °C. A similar doubling was also observed in PiBMA. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 39: 2444–2453, 2001     

Copolymerization of 2‐isothiocyanatoethyl methacrylate and 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate or methacrylic acid based on a nucleophile‐tolerant property of the isothiocyanato group

Radical copolymerizations of 2‐isothiocyanatoethyl methacrylate (ITEMA) and 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) or methacrylic acid (MAA) were examined, and fundamental properties of the obtained copolymers were investigated. The copolymerizations of various ITEMA/HEMA or ITEMA/MAA compositions proceeded effectively in THF or DMF by using 2,2′‐azobisbutyronitrile (AIBN) as an initiator, keeping the isothiocyanato groups and hydroxyl or carboxyl groups unchanged. Glass transition temperatures (T_g)s of poly(ITEMA‐co‐HEMA)s ranged from 68 to 100 °C, and they were thermally stable up to 200 °C. Meanwhile, T_gs of poly(ITEMA‐co‐MAA)s (ITEMA/MAA = 91/9, 76/24) were determined to be 91 and 109 °C, respectively. However, poly(ITEMA‐co‐MAA)s were thermally unstable, and significant weight loss was observed around 180 °C, which may be due to an addition of carboxyl groups to isothiocyanato groups followed by an elimination of COS to form amide structure in the copolymers. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2013 , 51, 5221–5229     

Preparation and clinical application of immunomagnetic latex

Magnetic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid) [P(MMA–MAA)] composite polymer latices were synthesized by two‐stage soapless emulsion polymerization in the presence of magnetite (Fe₃O₄) ferrofluids. Different types and concentrations of fatty acids were reacted with the Fe₃O₄ particles, which were prepared by the coprecipitation of Fe(II) and Fe(III) salts to obtain stable Fe₃O₄ ferrofluids. The Fe₃O₄/polymer particles were monodisperse, and the composite polymer particle size was approximately 100 nm. The morphology of the magnetic composite polymer latex particles was a core–shell structure. The core was PMMA encapsulating Fe₃O₄ particles, and the shell was the P(MMA–MAA) copolymer. The carboxylic acid functional groups (COOH) of methacrylic acid (MAA) were mostly distributed on the surface of the composite polymer latex particles. Antibodies (anti‐human immunoglobulin G) were then chemically bound with COOH groups onto the surface of the magnetic core–shell composite latices through the medium of carbodiimide to form the antibody‐coated magnetic latices (magnetic immunolatices). The MAA shell composition of the composite latex could be adjusted to control the number of COOH groups and thus the number of antibody molecules on the magnetic composite latex particles. With a magnetic sorting device, the magnetic immunolatices derived from the magnetic PMMA/P(MMA–MAA) core–shell composite polymer latex performed well in cell‐separation experiments based on the antigen–antibody reaction. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 1342–1356, 2005     

Carpetlike dense‐layer formation in a polyelectrolyte brush at the air/water interface

A carpetlike dense‐layer formation between a hydrophobic layer and a polyelectrolyte brush layer has been found in the monolayers of an ionic amphiphilic diblock copolymer, poly(1,1‐diethylsilacyclobutane)_m‐block‐poly(methacrylic acid)_n, on a water surface by an X‐ray reflectivity technique. By detailed analysis, we have found that the hydrophilic layer under the water is not a simple layer but is divided into two layers, that is, a carpetlike dense methacrylic acid (MAA) layer near the hydrophobic layer and a polyelectrolyte brush layer. We have also confirmed that a well‐established polyelectrolyte brush is formed only for the m:n = 43:81 polymer monolayer: For m:n = 40:10 and m:n = 45:60 polymer monolayers, only a dense MAA layer is formed. This dense‐layer formation should be the origin of the interesting hydrophobic‐layer thickness variation previously reported; The hydrophobic‐layer thickness takes a minimum as a function of the hydrophilic chain length at any surface pressure studied. An overview of the data for three samples with different chain lengths (m:n = 40:10, 45:60, or 43:81) has shown that the thickness of this dense layer is 10–20 Å and is independent of the surface pressure and polymerization degree of poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) in the range studied. This dense‐layer formation is explained by the reasonable speculation that contact with PMAA is thermodynamically more stable than direct contact with water for the diethylsilacyclobutane (Et₂SB) layer on water. In this sense, the dense layer acts like a carpet for the hydrophobic Et₂SB layer, and a 10–20‐Å thickness could be a critical value for the carpet. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 1921–1928, 2003     

Reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer polymerization of a typical hydrophobic monomer of styrene within microreactor of shell‐corona hollow microspheres suspending in water

Reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization of a typical hydrophobic monomer of styrene within microreactor of shell‐corona hollow microspheres of poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) suspending in water is studied. The shell‐corona hollow microspheres contain a hydrophilic corona of poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) and a cross‐linked polystyrene shell, which can suspend in water because of the hydrophilic corona of PMAA. The size of the shell‐corona hollow microspheres is about 289 nm and the extent of the microcavity of the hollow microsphere is 154 nm. These shell‐corona hollow microspheres can act as microreactor, within which the typical hydrophobic monomer of styrene, the RAFT agent of S‐benzyl dithiobenzoate and the initiator of 2,2′‐azobisisobutyronitrile can be encapsulated and RAFT polymerization of styrene takes place in well controlled manner in water. It is found that the resultant polymer of polystyrene has a competitively low polydispersity index and its number‐average molecular weight linearly increases with monomer conversion. The method is believed to be a new strategy of RAFT polymerization of hydrophobic monomer in aqueous solution. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2010     

Amphiphilic star‐block copolymers based on a hyperbranched core: Synthesis and supramolecular self‐assembly

Novel amphiphilic star‐block copolymers, star poly(caprolactone)‐block‐poly[(2‐dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate] and poly(caprolactone)‐block‐poly(methacrylic acid), with hyperbranched poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA–OH) as a core moiety were synthesized and characterized. The star‐block copolymers were prepared by a combination of ring‐opening polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). First, hyperbranched PHEMA–OH with 18 hydroxyl end groups on average was used as an initiator for the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone to produce PHEMA–PCL star homopolymers [PHEMA = poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate); PCL = poly(caprolactone)]. Next, the hydroxyl end groups of PHEMA–PCL were converted to 2‐bromoesters, and this gave rise to macroinitiator PHEMA–PCL–Br for ATRP. Then, 2‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate or tert‐butyl methacrylate was polymerized from the macroinitiators, and this afforded the star‐block copolymers PHEMA–PCL–PDMA [PDMA = poly(2‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)] and PHEMA–PCL–PtBMA [PtBMA = poly(tert‐butyl methacrylate)]. Characterization by gel permeation chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance confirmed the expected molecular structure. The hydrolysis of tert‐butyl ester groups of the poly(tert‐butyl methacrylate) blocks gave the star‐block copolymer PHEMA–PCL–PMAA [PMAA = poly(methacrylic acid)]. These amphiphilic star‐block copolymers could self‐assemble into spherical micelles, as characterized by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 6534–6544, 2005     

Amphiphilic conetworks. IV. Poly(methacrylic acid)‐l‐polyisobutylene and poly(acrylic acid)‐l‐polyisobutylene based hydrogels prepared by two‐step polymer procedure. New pH responsive conetworks

This article describes the synthesis and characterization of new amphiphilic polymer conetworks containing hydrophilic poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) or poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and hydrophobic polyisobutylene (PIB) chains. These conetworks were prepared by a two‐step polymer synthesis. In the first step, a cationic copolymer of isobutylene (IB) and 3‐isopropenyl‐α,α‐dimethylbenzyl isocyanate (IDI) was prepared. The isocyanate groups of the IB–IDI random copolymer were subsequently transformed in situ to methacrylate (MA) groups in reaction with 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). In the second step, the resulting MA‐multifunctional PIB‐based crosslinker, PIB(MA)_n, with an average functionality of approximately four methacrylic groups per chain, was copolymerized with methacrylic acid (MAA) or acrylic acid (AA) by radical mechanism in tetrahydrofuran giving rise to amphiphilic conetworks containing 31–79 mol % of MAA or 26–36 mol % of AA. The synthesized conetworks were characterized with solid‐state ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. The amphiphilic nature of the conetworks was proven by swelling in both aqueous media with low and high pH and n‐heptane. The effect of varying pH on the swelling behavior of the synthesized conetworks is presented. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 1284–1291, 2009