Comparison cones for multiparameter eigenvalue problems

We consider the multiparameter eigenvalue problem (T_r + ∑_{s = 1}^kλ_sV_rs) x_r = 0, x_r ≠ 0, 1 ? r ? k, where T_r and V_rs are self-adjoint linear operators on Hilbert spaces H_r, the V_rs being bounded. The problem may be posed in either ⊕_{r = 1}^kH_r or ⊕_{r = 1}^kH_r and we develop variational approaches for both settings. We explore the rôles played in both settings by $\text{C ={λ ∈ R}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{|}\text{∑}\text{k}\text{s=1}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(V}{}^{\mathrm{rs}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{,x}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{? 0}$ for some nonozero and related cones in $\text{R}$^k. We also compare certain geometrical conditions on C with analytical definiteness conditions already in the literature.     

A completeness theorem for a nonlinear multiparameter eigenvalue problem

In this paper we study the linked nonlinear multiparameter system

$\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{r}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{) + M}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{+}\text{∑}\text{s=1}\text{k}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{rs}}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{) + P}{}_{\mathrm{rs}}\text{) Y}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{) = 0, r = l,…, k}$

, where x_r? [a_r, b_r], y_r is subject to Sturm-Liouville boundary conditions, and the continuous functions a_rs satisfy ¦ $\text{A ¦ (x) =}\text{det}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{rs}}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{) > 0}$. Conditions on the polynomial operators M_r, P_rs are produced which guarantee a sequence of eigenfunctions for this problem yⁿ(x) = Π_r=1^ky_rⁿ(x_r), n ? 1, which form a basis in $\text{L}{}^2\text{([a, b], ¦ A ¦)}$. Here [a, b] = [a₁, b₁ × … × [a_k, b_k].     

On the absolute continuity of Schrödinger operators with spherically symmetric,long-range potentials,II

Let H = ?Δ + V, where the potential V is spherically symmetric and can be decomposed as a sum of a short-range and a long-range term, V(r) = V_S(r) + V_L. Let λ = lim sup_r→∞V_L(r) < ∞ (we allow λ = ? ∞) and set λ⁺ = max(λ, 0). Assume that for some r₀, V_L(r) ?C^2k(r₀, ∞) and that there exists δ > 0 such that $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dr}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) · (λ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{? V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= O(r}{}^{\mathrm{?j\delta }}\text{), j = 1,…, 2k,}\text{as}\text{r → ∞}$. Assume further that $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{dr}\text{¦ V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r)¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{) = ∞}$ and that 2kδ > 1. It is shown that: (a) The restriction of H to C^∞(Rⁿ) is essentially self-adjoint, (b) The essential spectrum of H contains the closure of (λ, ∞). (c) The part of H over (λ, ∞) is absolutely continuous.     

A determinant of symmetric forms

Let Δ(α + β) = |H_λ2?r+1| where H_r is the complete symmetric function in (α₁ + β₁), (α₂ + β₂), …, (α_n + β_n). It is proved that Δ(α + β) ? Δ(α) + Δ(β). This inequality is generalised for certain symmetric functions defined by Littlewood. Let . Then we prove that Ω(α + β) ? Ω(α) + Ω(β). Here λ₁, λ₂, λ₃, …, λ_n is a partition such that λ_n > λ_n?1 > ··· > λ₂ > λ₁.     

On exponential bases for the Sobolev spaces over an interval

We suppose that K is a countable index set and that $\text{Λ = {λ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{¦ k ? K}}$ is a sequence of distinct complex numbers such that forms a Riesz (strong) basis for L²[a, b], a < b. Let Σ = {σ₁, σ₂,…, σ_m} consist of m complex numbers not in Λ. Then, with p(λ) = Π_{k = 1}^m (λ ? σ_k), forms a Riesz (strong) bas Sobolev space H^m[a, b]. If we take σ₁, σ₂,…, σ_m to be complex numbers already in Λ, then, defining p(λ) as before, forms a Riesz (strong) basis for the space H^?m[a, b]. We also discuss the extension of these results to “generalized exponentials” tⁿe^λ_kt.     

Construction of a recurrence relation for modified moments

In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{r}\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(k)m}{}_{\mathrm{k+i}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f] = ω(k)}$

for integrals (called modified moments)

$\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f]df=}\text{∫}\text{?1}\text{1}\text{f(x)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(\lambda )}}\text{(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)}$

in which C_k^(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order $\text{λ(λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$, and f is a function satisfying the differential equation

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)f}{}^{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)}$

of order n, where p₀, p₁, …, p_n ? 0 are polynomials, and m_k^〈λ〉[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.     

A decomposition theorem for an analytic function

Let f(z), an analytic function with radius of convergence R (0 < R < ∞) be represented by the gap series ∑_{k = 0}^∞c_kz^λ_k. Set and define the growth constants ?, λ, T, t by

$\text{?}\text{λ}\text{=}\text{lim sup}\text{r→R}\text{inf}\text{{}\text{log}\text{[Rr /(R?r)]}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{M(r)}}$

, and if 0 < ? < ∞,

$\text{T}\text{t}\text{=}\text{lim sup}\text{r→R}\text{inf}\text{{[Rr /(R?r)]}{}^{\mathrm{??}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{M(r)}}$

. Then, assuming 0 < t < T < ∞, we obtain a decomposition theorem for f(z).     

On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

The probability that k positive integers are relatively r-prime

If r, k are positive integers, then $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples of positive integers (x₁, x₂, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r = 1. An explicit formula for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ is derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{ζ(rk)}$.If S = {p₁, p₂, …, p_a} is a finite set of primes, then 〈S〉 = {p₁^a₁p₂^a₂…p_s^a_s; p_i ∈ S and a_i ≥ 0 for all i} and $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples (x₁, x₃, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r ∈ 〈S〉. Asymptotic formulas for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ are derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(p}{}_1\text{… p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{ζ(rk)(p}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1) … (p}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1)}$.     

Generalizations of two inequalities involving hermitian forms

Let λ₁ and λ_N be, respectively, the greatest and smallest eigenvalues of an N×N hermitian matrix H=(h_ij), and x=(x₁,x₂,…,x_N) with (x,x)=1. Then, it is known that (1) λ₁?(x,Hx)?λ_N and (2) if, in addition, H is positive definite, $\text{(λ}{}_1\text{+λ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{)}{}^2\text{4λ}{}_1\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{?(x,Hx)(x,H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{x)?1}$. Assuming that y=(y₁,y₂,…, y_N) and |y_i|?1, i=1,2,…,N, it is shown in this paper that these inequalities remain true if H and H^?1 are, respectively, replaced by the Hadamard products $\text{M(y)1H}$ and $\text{M(y)1H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, where M(y) is a matrix defined by $\text{M(y)=(δ}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{+(1?δ}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{)}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$. Subsequently, these results are extended to improve the spectral bounds of $\text{M(y)1H}$.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

Series inversion of some convolution transforms

We study degeneration for ? → + 0 of the two-point boundary value problems

$\text{τ?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{u := ?((au′)′ + bu′ + cu) ± xu′ ? κu = h, u(±1) = A ± B}$

, and convergence of the operators T_?⁺ and T_?^? on $\text{L}$²(?1, 1) connected with them, T_?^±u := τ_?^±u for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{, D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ u″ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}, T}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{u: = xu′}$

for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{), D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ xu′ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}}$

. Here ? is a small positive parameter, λ a complex “spectral” parameter; a, b and c are real $\text{b}$^∞-functions, a(x) ? γ > 0 for all x? [?1, 1] and h is a sufficiently smooth complex function. We prove that the limits of the eigenvalues of T_?⁺ and of T_?^? are the negative and nonpositive integers respectively by comparison of the general case to the special case in which a  1 and b  c  0 and in which we can compute the limits exactly. We show that (T_?⁺ ? λ)^?1 converges for ? → +0 strongly to (T₀⁺ ? λ)^?1 if $\text{R e λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. In an analogous way, we define the operator T_?⁺, n (n ? $\text{N}$ in the Sobolev space H₀^?n(? 1, 1) as a restriction of τ_?⁺ and prove strong convergence of (T⁺_?,n ? λ)^?1 for ? → +0 in this space of distributions if $\text{R e λ > ?n ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. With aid of the maximum principle we infer from this that, if h?$\text{C}$¹, the solution of τ_?⁺u ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B converges for ? → +0 uniformly on [?1, ? ?] ∪ [?, 1] to the solution of xu′ ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B for each p > 0 and for each λ ? $\text{C}$ if ? ?$\text{N}$.Finally we prove by duality that the solution of τ_?^?u ? λu = h converges to a definite solution of the reduced equation uniformly on each compact subset of (?1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) if h is sufficiently smooth and if 1 ? ?$\text{N}$.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

The virial theorem in relativistic quantum mechanics

For a class of potentials including the Coulomb potential q = μr^?1 with ¦ μ ¦ < 1 (1) (i.e., atomic numbers Z ? 137), the virial theorem $\text{(u, α ·}\text{p}\text{u) = (u, r(}\text{?q}\text{?r}\text{)u)}$ is shown to hold, u being an eigenfunction of the operator

$\text{Hu = TU : = (α ·}\text{p}\text{+ β + q)u}$

,

$\text{D(H) = {u ¦ u ∈ [H}{}_{\mathrm{loc}}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}\text{+}{}^3\text{)]}{}^4\text{, r}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{u, TU ∈ [L}{}^2\text{(R)}{}^3\text{]}{}^4\text{}}$

($\text{R}$₊³ := $\text{R}$?{0}). The result implies in particular that H with (1) does not have any eigenvalues embedded in the continuum. The proof uses a scale transformation.     

Inverse Hölder inequalities in one and several dimensions

We study certain functionals and obtain an inverse Hölder inequality for n functions f₁^a1,…,f_n^an (f_k concave, 1 dimension).We also prove a multidimensional inverse Hölder inequality for n functions f₁,…,f_n, where $\text{?}{}^2\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{? 0, i = 1,…, d, k = 1,…, n}$.Finally we give an inverse Minkowski inequality for concave functions.     

Capacitance and the conformal module of quadrilaterals

Let ? be defined on T^r and have an absolutely convergent Fourier series

. Set $\text{∥?∥ = ∑ ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{¦}$. In this paper the problem of determining the limit of $\text{∥?}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}$, as n → ∞, is studied.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

A periodicity lemma in linear diophantine analysis

Let g = (g₁,…,g_r) ≥ 0 and h = (h₁,…,h_r) ≥ 0, g_?, h_? ∈ $\text{J}$, be two vectors of nonnegative integers and let λ ? $\text{J}$, λ ≥ 0, λ ≡ 0 mod d, where d denotes g.c.d. (g₁,…,g_r). Define

$\text{Δ(λ)=Δ(λg,h):=}\text{min}\text{∑}\text{?=1}\text{r}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{:x}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{?0,x}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{∈J,}\text{∑}\text{?=1}\text{?}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{=λ}$

It is shown in this paper that Λ(λ) is periodic in λ with constant jump. If i? {1,…,r} is such that

$\text{det}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{? (?1,…r)}$

then

$\text{Δ(λ)+g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{Δ(λ)+h}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$

holds true for all sufficiently large λ, λ ≡ 0 mod d.