Parallel algorithms for continuous multifacility competitive location problems

We consider a continuous location problem in which a firm wants to set up two or more new facilities in a competitive environment. Both the locations and the qualities of the new facilities are to be found so as to maximize the profit obtained by the firm. This hard-to-solve global optimization problem has been addressed in Redondo et al. (Evol. Comput.17(1), 21–53, 2009) using several heuristic approaches. Through a comprehensive computational study, it was shown that the evolutionary algorithm uego is the heuristic which provides the best solutions. In this work, uego is parallelized in order to reduce the computational time of the sequential version, while preserving its capability at finding the optimal solutions. The parallelization follows a coarse-grain model, where each processing element executes the uego algorithm independently of the others during most of the time. Nevertheless, some genetic information can migrate from a processor to another occasionally, according to a migratory policy. Two migration processes, named Ring-Opt and Ring-Fusion2, have been adapted to cope the multiple facilities location problem, and a superlinear speedup has been obtained.     

The multifacility maximin planar location problem with facility interaction

^** Email: s.salhi{at}kent.ac.uk Two branch-and-bound algorithms are proposed to optimally solvethe maximin formulation for locating p facilities in the plane.Tight upper and lower bounds are constructed and suitable methodsof guiding the search developed. To enhance the method, efficientmeasures for identifying specific squares for subdivision aresuggested. The proposed algorithms are evaluated on a set ofrandomly generated problems of up to five facilities and 120nodes.     

Optimal location and design of a competitive facility

A single facility has to be located in competition with fixed existing facilities of similar type. Demand is supposed to be concentrated at a finite number of points, and consumers patronise the facility to which they are attracted most. Attraction is expressed by some function of the quality of the facility and its distance to demand. For existing facilities quality is fixed, while quality of the new facility may be freely chosen at known costs. The total demand captured by the new facility generates income. The question is to find that location and quality for the new facility which maximises the resulting profits.It is shown that this problem is well posed as soon as consumers are novelty oriented, i.e. attraction ties are resolved in favour of the new facility. Solution of the problem then may be reduced to a bicriterion maxcovering-minquantile problem for which solution methods are known. In the planar case with Euclidean distances and a variety of attraction functions this leads to a finite algorithm polynomial in the number of consumers, whereas, for more general instances, the search of a maximal profit solution is reduced to solving a series of small-scale nonlinear optimisation problems. Alternative tie-resolution rules are finally shown to result in problems in which optimal solutions might not exist.Mathematics Subject Classification (2000):90B85, 90C30, 90C29, 91B42Partially supported by Grant PB96-1416-C02-02 of the D.G.E.S. and Grant BFM2002-04525-C02-02 of Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, Spain     

A competitive hub location and pricing problem

We formulate and solve a new hub location and pricing problem, describing a situation in which an existing transportation company operates a hub and spoke network, and a new company wants to enter into the same market, using an incomplete hub and spoke network. The entrant maximizes its profit by choosing the best hub locations and network topology and applying optimal pricing, considering that the existing company applies mill pricing. Customers’ behavior is modeled using a logit discrete choice model. We solve instances derived from the CAB dataset using a genetic algorithm and a closed expression for the optimal pricing. Our model confirms that, in competitive settings, seeking the largest market share is dominated by profit maximization. We also describe some conditions under which it is not convenient for the entrant to enter the market.     

A capacitated competitive facility location problem

We consider a mathematical model similar in a sense to competitive location problems. There are two competing parties that sequentially open their facilities aiming to “capture” customers and maximize profit. In our model, we assume that facilities’ capacities are bounded. The model is formulated as a bilevel integer mathematical program, and we study the problem of obtaining its optimal (cooperative) solution. It is shown that the problem can be reformulated as that of maximization of a pseudo-Boolean function with the number of arguments equal to the number of places available for facility opening. We propose an algorithm for calculating an upper bound for values that the function takes on subsets which are specified by partial (0, 1)-vectors.     

The design of multiactivity multifacility systems

We consider a service/distribution system in which each of N activities is to be carried out at one or several facility locations. Each activity is to be assigned to one out of a specified set of configurations; each configuration is a specific subset of the set of L facilities being considered, along with a specific strategy for their use. We call such a system a multiactivity multifacility system and present a mathematical formulation for its optimal design that includes capacity restrictions at the facilities and the treatment of multiple criteria. The design problem is simply to choose an appropriate configuration for each of the N activities. We discuss various criteria, and we show that the multiactivity multifacility design problem includes many familiar discrete location problems as special cases. We introduce a 0–1 linear optimization model called the Team Generalized Assignment Problem (T-GAP) and show that parametric solution of a T-GAP will yield all efficient solutions of the multiactivity multifacility design problem with multiple criteria. Rather than attempting to find all efficient solutions, however, we advocate an interactive approach and describe an interactive branch-and-bound algorithm that solves the design problem as a finite sequence of T-GAP's.     

Approximate algorithms for the competitive facility location problem

We consider the competitive facility location problem in which two competing sides (the Leader and the Follower) open in succession their facilities, and each consumer chooses one of the open facilities basing on its own preferences. The problem amounts to choosing the Leader’s facility locations so that to obtain maximal profit taking into account the subsequent facility location by the Follower who also aims to obtain maximal profit. We state the problem as a two-level integer programming problem. A method is proposed for calculating an upper bound for the maximal profit of the Leader. The corresponding algorithm amounts to constructing the classical maximum facility location problem and finding an optimal solution to it. Simultaneously with calculating an upper bound we construct an initial approximate solution to the competitive facility location problem. We propose some local search algorithms for improving the initial approximate solutions. We include the results of some simulations with the proposed algorithms, which enable us to estimate the precision of the resulting approximate solutions and give a comparative estimate for the quality of the algorithms under consideration for constructing the approximate solutions to the problem.     

Competitive facility location and design problem

We develop a spatial interaction model that seeks to simultaneously optimize location and design decisions for a set of new facilities. The facilities compete for customer demand with pre-existing competitive facilities and with each other. The customer demand is assumed to be elastic, expanding as the utility of the service offered by the facilities increases. Increases in the utility can be achieved by increasing the number of facilities, design improvements, or locating facilities closer to the customer.     

Recent insights in Huff-like competitive facility location and design

Recently, several articles appeared on the location–design problem that firms face when entering a competing market. All use a Huff-like attraction model. We discuss the formulation of the base model, the different settings studied in the papers and summarise their findings.     

Coincidence conditions in multifacility location problems with positive and negative weights

In minisum multifacility location problems one has to find locations for some new facilities, such that the weighted sum of distances between the new and a certain number of old facilities with known locations is minimized. In this kind of problem, the optimal locations of clusters of facilities frequently tend to coincide. By testing conditions for coincidence, one has the opportunity to collapse some or even all facilities coinciding at an optimal point into one. In this way, the dimension of the problem and the degree of nondifferentiability is reduced. Several conditions for coincidence have been published recently. In this paper, these conditions are extended and improved with respect to new sufficient coincidence conditions for location problems with attracting and repelling facilities. An example shows that these new conditions detect more coincidences than the conditions which are known so far, even if all facilities involved are attracting ones.     

Geometric interpretation of the optimality conditions in multifacility location and applications

Geometrical optimality conditions are developed for the minisum multifacility location problem involving any norm. These conditions are then used to derive sufficient conditions for coincidence of facilities at optimality; an example is given to show that these coincidence conditions seem difficult to generalize.     

Geometric interpretation of the optimality conditions in multifacility location and applications

Several corrections to Ref. 1 are pointed out.     

Sensitivity analysis for a Lagrange dual problem to a vector optimization problem

In this paper, sensitivity analysis for a Lagrange dual problem to a vector optimization problem is firstly studied. Then sensitivity analysis of the vector optimization problem is also discussed. Finally, the dual relationships between the obtained results are established.     

Solving a Huff-like competitive location and design model for profit maximization in the plane

A chain wants to set up a single new facility in a planar market where similar facilities of competitors, and possibly of its own chain, are already present. Fixed demand points split their demand probabilistically over all facilities in the market proportionally with their attraction to each facility, determined by the different perceived qualities of the facilities and the distances to them, through a gravitational or logit type model. Both the location and the quality (design) of the new facility are to be found so as to maximise the profit obtained for the chain. Several types of constraints and costs are considered.     

Duality for constrained multifacility location problems with mixed norms and applications

A dual problem is developed for the constrained multifacility minisum location problems involving mixed norms. General optimality conditions are also obtained providing new algorithms based on the concept of partial inverse of a multifunction. These algorithms which are decomposition methods, generate sequences globally converging to a primal and a dual solution respectively. Numerical results are reported.     

Multi-objective competitive location problem with distance-based attractiveness and its best non-dominated solution

The multi-objective competitive location problem (MOCLP) with distance-based attractiveness is introduced. There are m potential competitive facilities and n demand points on the same plane. All potential facilities can provide attractiveness to the demand point which the facility attractiveness is represented as distance-based coverage of a facility, which is “full coverage” within the maximum full coverage radius, “no coverage” outside the maximum partial coverage radius, and “partial coverage” between those two radii. Each demand point covered by one of m potential facilities is determined by the greatest accumulated attractiveness provided the selected facilities and least accumulated distances between each demand point and selected facility, simultaneously. The tradeoff of maximum accumulated attractiveness and minimum accumulated distances is represented as a multi-objective optimization model. A proposed solution procedure to find the best non-dominated solution set for MOCLP is introduced. Several numerical examples and instances comparing with introduced and exhaustive method demonstrates the good performance and efficiency for the proposed solution procedure.     

The minimum equitable radius location problem with continuous demand

We analyze the location of p facilities satisfying continuous area demand. Three objectives are considered: (i) the p-center objective (to minimize the maximum distance between all points in the area and their closest facility), (ii) equalizing the load service by the facilities, and (iii) the minimum equitable radius – minimizing the maximum radius from each point to its closest facility subject to the constraint that each facility services the same load. The paper offers three contributions: (i) a new problem – the minimum equitable radius is presented and solved by an efficient algorithm, (ii) an improved and efficient algorithm is developed for the solution of the p-center problem, and (iii) an improved algorithm for the equitable load problem is developed. Extensive computational experiments demonstrated the superiority of the new solution algorithms.     

The branch-and-bound algorithm for a competitive facility location problem with the prescribed choice of suppliers

In the mathematical model under study, the two competing sides consecutively place their facilities aiming to capture consumers and maximize profits. The model amounts to a bilevel integer programming problem. We take the optimal noncooperative solutions as optimal to this problem. To find approximate and optimal solutions, we propose a branch-and-bound algorithm. Simulations show that the algorithm can be applied to solve the individual problems of low and medium dimension.     

Perception and information in a competitive location model

This paper considers a situation in which two competitors locate one facility each at the vertices of a tree. Their decisions are based on the capture of demands at the vertices of the tree. As opposed to the usual models, it is assumed that the true demands are unknown and that each competitor has its own perception of them. The paper investigates a facility planner's advantage that results from knowledge concerning his competitor's perception. Stackelberg solutions are analyzed as well as possible advantages to the competitor who locates first.